The function of photosystem I. Quantum chemical insight into the role of tryptophan-quinone interactions

Quantum chemical calculations have provided evidence for the role of tryptophan residues in the electron transfer process of photosystem I (PS-I). The interaction of Trp with quinone acceptors and their radical anions in the A(1) site of PS-I has been modeled by various indole-quinone and indole-semiquinone complexes. MP2 optimizations show that, while neutral quinones and an indole molecule prefer a pi-stacked arrangement, semiquinone radical anions prefer a T-stacked conformation with significant N-H...pi hydrogen bonding interactions. Comparison of density functional calculations of electronic g-tensors with electron paramagnetic resonance data strongly suggests that hydrogen-bonded T-shaped arrangements occur upon reduction of quinone acceptors without an extended side chain (e.g., duroquinone or naphthoquinone), when reconstituted into the phylloquinone-depleted A(1) site of PS-I. In contrast, for the native phylloquinone (vitamin K(1), Q(K)), reorientation of the semiquinone radical anion is prevented by side chain-protein interactions. For a fixed pi-stacked arrangement, the extent of the intermolecular interaction is reduced upon one-electron reduction. This corresponds to a lowering of the redox potential of the P(700)(+)*Q(K)(-)* radical pair, due to interactions of Q(K) with a tryptophan. Together with the comparably weak hydrogen bonding in PS-I, the proposed model explains the very negative redox potential of the A(1) site, needed for forward electron transfer. T-stacking hydrogen bonds to semiquinones may also have to be considered in many other electron transfer processes in living organisms.     

Modeling binding kinetics at the Q(A) site in bacterial reaction centers

Bacterial reaction centers (RCs) catalyze a series of electron-transfer reactions reducing a neutral quinone to a bound, anionic semiquinone. The dissociation constants and association rates of 13 tailless neutral and anionic benzo- and naphthoquinones for the Q(A) site were measured and compared. The K(d) values for these quinones range from 0.08 to 90 microM. For the eight neutral quinones, including duroquinone (DQ) and 2,3-dimethoxy-5-methyl-1,4-benzoquinone (UQ(0)), the quinone concentration and solvent viscosity dependence of the association rate indicate a second-order rate-determining step. The association rate constants (k(on)) range from 10(5) to 10(7) M(-)(1) s(-)(1). Association and dissociation rate constants were determined at pH values above the hydroxyl pK(a) for five hydroxyl naphthoquinones. These negatively charged compounds are competitive inhibitors for the Q(A) site. While the neutral quinones reach equilibrium in milliseconds, anionic hydroxyl quinones with similar K(d) values take minutes to bind or dissociate. These slow rates are independent of ionic strength, solvent viscosity, and quinone concentration, indicating a first-order rate-limiting step. The anionic semiquinone, formed by forward electron transfer at the Q(A) site, also dissociates slowly. It is not possible to measure the association rate of the unstable semiquinone. However, as the protein creates kinetic barriers for binding and releasing anionic hydroxyl quinones without greatly increasing the affinity relative to neutral quinones, it is suggested that the Q(A) site may do the same for anionic semiquinone. Thus, the slow semiquinone dissociation may not indicate significant thermodynamic stabilization of the reduced species in the Q(A) site.     

Protein control of the redox potential of the primary quinone acceptor in reactioncCenters from Rhodobacter sphaeroides

The role of the protein environment in determining the redox midpoint potential (E(m)) of Q(A), the primary quinone of bacterial reaction centers, was investigated by mutation of isoleucine at position 265 of the M subunit in Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Isoleucine was changed to threonine, serine, and valine, yielding mutants M265IT, M265IS, and M265IV, respectively. All three mutants, with smaller residues replacing isoleucine, exhibited decreased binding affinities of the Q(A) site for various quinone analogues, consistent with an enlargement or loosening of the headgroup binding domain and a decrease in the van der Waals contact for small quinones. In all other respects, M265IV was like the wild type, but the polar mutants, M265IT and M265IS, had unexpectedly dramatic decreases in the redox midpoint potential of Q(A), resulting in faster rates of P(+)Q(A)(-) charge recombination. For both anthraquinone and native ubiquinone, the in situ E(m) of Q(A) was estimated to be approximately 100 and 85 mV lower in M265IT and M265IS, respectively. The effect on E(m)(Q(A)) indicates destabilization of the semiquinone or stabilization of the quinone. This is suggested to arise from either (i) electrostatic interaction between the partial charges or dipole of the residue hydroxyl group and the charge distribution of quinone and semiquinone states with particular influence near the C4 carbonyl group or (ii) from hydrogen bonding interactions between the hydroxyl oxygen and the N(delta)H of histidine M219, causing a weakening of the hydrogen bond to the C4 carbonyl. The rate of the first electron transfer (k(AB)(()(1)())) in the polar mutants was the same as in the wild type at low pH but decelerated at higher pH with altered pH dependence. The rate of the second electron transfer (k(AB)(()(2)())) was 3-4-fold greater than in the wild type over the whole pH range from 4 to 11, consistent with a larger driving force for electron transfer derived from the lower E(m) of Q(A).     

The influence of hydrogen bonds on electron transfer rate in photosynthetic RCs

Hydrogen bonds formed between photosynthetic reaction centers (RCs) and their cofactors were shown to affect the efficacy of electron transfer. The mechanism of such influence is determined by sensitivity of hydrogen bonds to electron density rearrangements, which alter hydrogen bonds potential energy surface. Quantum chemistry calculations were carried out on a system consisting of a primary quinone Q(A), non-heme Fe(2+) ion and neighboring residues(.) The primary quinone forms two hydrogen bonds with its environment, one of which was shown to be highly sensitive to the Q(A) state. In the case of the reduced primary quinone two stable hydrogen bond proton positions were shown to exist on [Q(A)-His(M219)] hydrogen bond line, while there is only one stable proton position in the case of the oxidized primary quinone. Taking into account this fact and also the ability of proton to transfer between potential energy wells along a hydrogen bond, theoretical study of temperature dependence of hydrogen bond polarization was carried out. Current theory was successfully applied to interpret dark P(+)/Q(A)(-) recombination rate temperature dependence.     

Changes in the redox potential of primary and secondary electron-accepting quinones in photosystem II confer increased resistance to photoinhibition in low-temperature-acclimated Arabidopsis

Exposure of control (non-hardened) Arabidopsis leaves for 2 h at high irradiance at 5 degrees C resulted in a 55% decrease in photosystem II (PSII) photochemical efficiency as indicated by F(v)/F(m). In contrast, cold-acclimated leaves exposed to the same conditions showed only a 22% decrease in F(v)/F(m). Thermoluminescence was used to assess the possible role(s) of PSII recombination events in this differential resistance to photoinhibition. Thermoluminescence measurements of PSII revealed that S(2)Q(A)(-) recombination was shifted to higher temperatures, whereas the characteristic temperature of the S(2)Q(B)(-) recombination was shifted to lower temperatures in cold-acclimated plants. These shifts in recombination temperatures indicate higher activation energy for the S(2)Q(A)(-) redox pair and lower activation energy for the S(2)Q(B)(-) redox pair. This results in an increase in the free-energy gap between P680(+)Q(A)(-) and P680(+)Pheo(-) and a narrowing of the free energy gap between primary and secondary electron-accepting quinones in PSII electron acceptors. We propose that these effects result in an increased population of reduced primary electron-accepting quinone in PSII, facilitating non-radiative P680(+)Q(A)(-) radical pair recombination. Enhanced reaction center quenching was confirmed using in vivo chlorophyll fluorescence-quenching analysis. The enhanced dissipation of excess light energy within the reaction center of PSII, in part, accounts for the observed increase in resistance to high-light stress in cold-acclimated Arabidopsis plants.     

Primary quinone (QA) binding site of bacterial photosynthetic reaction centers: mutations at residue M265 probed by FTIR spectroscopy

In the primary quinone (Q(A)) binding site of Rb. sphaeroides reaction centers (RCs), isoleucine M265 is in extensive van der Waals contact with the ubiquinone headgroup. Substitution of threonine or serine for this residue (mutants M265IT and M265IS), but not valine (mutant M265IV), lowers the redox midpoint potential of Q(A) by about 100 mV (Takahashi et al. (2001) Biochemistry 40, 1020-1028). The unexpectedly large effect of the polar substitutions is not due to reorientation of the methoxy groups as similar redox potential changes are seen for these mutants with either ubiquinone or anthraquinone as Q(A). Using FTIR spectroscopy to compare Q(A)(-)/Q(A) IR difference spectra for wild type and the M265 mutant RCs, we found changes in the polar mutants (M265IT and M265IS) in the quinone C[double bond]O and C[double bond]C stretching region (1600-1660 cm(-1)) and in the semiquinone anion band (1440-1490 cm(-1)), as well as in protein modes. Modeling the mutations into the X-ray structure of the wild-type RC indicates that the hydroxyl group of the mutant polar residues, Thr and Ser, is hydrogen bonded to the peptide C[double bond]O of Thr(M261). It is suggested that the mutational effect is exerted through the extended backbone region that includes Ala(M260), the hydrogen bonding partner to the C1 carbonyl of the quinone headgroup. The resulting structural perturbations are likely to include lengthening of the hydrogen bond between the quinone C1[double bond]O and the peptide NH of Ala(M260). Possible origins of the IR spectroscopic and redox potential effects are discussed.     

Absorption changes induced by the binding of triazines to the QB pocket in reaction centers of Rhodobacter capsulatus

Inhibitors which block electron transfer from the primary (Q(A)) to the secondary (Q(B)) quinone of the bacterial reaction center are competing with the pool ubiquinones for binding at the Q(B) pocket. Due to the much greater stability of the semiquinone state Q(B)(-) compared with fully oxidized or reduced quinone, a displacement of the inhibitors takes place after one flash from state Q(A)(-)I to state Q(A)Q(B)(-). This process can be monitored from near-IR absorption changes which reflect local absorption shifts specific to Q(A)(-) and Q(B)(-). An anomalous behavior was observed when using triazines in chromatophores of R. capsulatus: the IR absorption change reflecting the formation of Q(B)(-) after one flash was absent. A normal transient decay of this signal was, however, triggered by a second flash, followed by a rapid return to the baseline. We show that this phenomenon is due to an absorption change induced by inhibitor binding (thus present in the dark baseline), with a spectrum close to that of Q(B)(-), so that the Q(B)(-) changes are canceled out during the inhibitor displacement process. On the second flash, one monitors the destruction of the semiquinone, leading transiently to the Q(A)Q(B) state, followed by inhibitor rebinding. This allows a direct measurement of the binding kinetics. This behavior was observed both in chromatophores and in isolated reaction centers from R. capsulatus, but not in R. sphaeroides.     

Redox potential of quinones in photosynthetic reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides: dependence on protonation of Glu-L212 and Asp-L213

The absolute values of the one-electron redox potentials of the two quinones (Q(A) and Q(B)) in bacterial photosynthetic reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides were calculated by evaluating the electrostatic energies from the solution of the linearized Poisson-Boltzmann equation at pH 7.0. The redox potential for Q(A) was calculated to be between -173 and -160 mV, which is close to the lowest measured values that are assumed to refer to nonequilibrated protonation patterns in the redox state Q(A)(-). The redox potential of quinone Q(B) is found to be about 160-220 mV larger for the light-exposed than for the dark-adapted structure. These values of the redox potentials are obtained if Asp-L213 is nearly protonated (probability 0.75-1.0) before and after electron transfer from Q(A) to Q(B), while Glu-L212 is partially protonated (probability 0.6) in the initial state Q(A)(-)Q(B)(0) and fully protonated in the final state Q(A)(0)Q(B)(-). Conversely, if the charge state of the quinones is varied from Q(A)(-)Q(B)(0) to Q(A)(0)Q(B)(-) corresponding to the electron transfer from Q(A) to Q(B), Asp-L213 remains protonated, while Glu-L212 changes its protonation state from 0.15 H(+) to fully protonated. In agreement with results from FTIR spectra, there is proton uptake at Glu-L212 going along with the electron transfer, whereas Asp-L213 does not change its protonation state. However, in our simulations Asp-L213 is considered to be protonated rather than ionized as deduced from FTIR spectra. The calculated redox potential of Q(A) shows little dependence on the charge state of Asp-L213, which is due to a strong coupling with the protonation state of Asp-M17 but increases by 50 mV if Glu-L212 changes from the ionized to the protonated charge state. Both are in agreement with fluorescence measurements observing the decay of SP(+)Q(A)(-) in a wide pH regime. The computed difference in redox potential of Q(B) in the light-exposed and dark-adapted structure was traced back to the hydrogen bond of Q(B) with His-L190 that is lost in the dark-adapted structure and the charge of the non-heme iron atom, which is closer to Q(B) in the light-exposed than in the dark-adapted structure.     

Electrogenic reactions and dielectric properties of photosystem II

This review is focused on the mechanism of photovoltage generation involving the photosystem II turnover. This large integral membrane enzyme catalyzes the light-driven oxidation of water and reduction of plastoquinone. The data discussed in this work show that there are four main electrogenic steps in native complexes: (i) light-induced charge separation between special pair chlorophylls P(680) and primary quinone acceptor Q(A); (ii) P(680)(+) reduction by the redox-active tyrosine Y(Z) of polypeptide D1; (iii) oxidation of Mn cluster by Y(Z)(ox) followed by proton release, and (iv) protonation of double reduced secondary quinone acceptor Q(B). The electrogenicity related to (i) proton-coupled electron transfer between Q(A)(-) and preoxidized non-heme iron (Fe(3+)) in native and (ii) electron transfer between protein-water boundary and Y(Z)(ox) in the presence of redox-dye(s) in Mn-depleted samples, respectively, were also considered. Evaluation of the dielectric properties using the electrometric data and the polarity profiles of reaction center from purple bacteria Blastochloris viridis and photosystem II are presented. The knowledge of the profile of dielectric permittivity along the photosynthetic reaction center is important for understanding of the mechanism of electron transfer between redox cofactors.     

Light-induced quinone reduction in photosystem II

The photosystem II core complex is the water:plastoquinone oxidoreductase of oxygenic photosynthesis situated in the thylakoid membrane of cyanobacteria, algae and plants. It catalyzes the light-induced transfer of electrons from water to plastoquinone accompanied by the net transport of protons from the cytoplasm (stroma) to the lumen, the production of molecular oxygen and the release of plastoquinol into the membrane phase. In this review, we outline our present knowledge about the "acceptor side" of the photosystem II core complex covering the reaction center with focus on the primary (Q(A)) and secondary (Q(B)) quinones situated around the non-heme iron with bound (bi)carbonate and a comparison with the reaction center of purple bacteria. Related topics addressed are quinone diffusion channels for plastoquinone/plastoquinol exchange, the newly discovered third quinone Q(C), the relevance of lipids, the interactions of quinones with the still enigmatic cytochrome b559 and the role of Q(A) in photoinhibition and photoprotection mechanisms. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Photosystem II.     

Full replacement of the function of the secondary electron acceptor phylloquinone(= vitamin K1) by non-quinone carbonyl compounds in green plant photosystem I photosynthetic reaction centers

One-carbonyl quinonoid compounds, fluorenone (fluoren-9-one), anthrone, and their derivatives are introduced into spinach photosystem (PS) I reaction centers in place of the intrinsic secondary electron acceptor phylloquinone (= vitamin K1). Anthrone and 2-nitrofluorenone fully mediated the electron-transfer reaction between the reduced primary electron acceptor chlorophyll A0- and the tertiary electron acceptor iron-sulfur centers. It is concluded that the PS I phylloquinone-binding site has a structure that enables various compounds with different molecular structures to function as the secondary acceptor and that the reactions of incorporated compounds are mainly determined by their redox properties rather than by their molecular structure. Carbonyl groups increase the binding affinity of the quinone/quinonoid compounds but do not seem to be essential to their function. The quinonoid compounds as well as quinones incorporated into the PS I phylloquinone-binding sites are estimated to function at redox potentials more negative than in organic solvents.     

The 2-methoxy group of ubiquinone is essential for function of the acceptor quinones in reaction centers from Rba. sphaeroides

The orientation of a methoxy substituent is known to substantially influence the electron affinity and vibrational spectroscopy of benzoquinones, and has been suggested to be important in determining the function of ubiquinone as a redox cofactor in bioenergetics. Ubiquinone functions as both the primary (Q(A)) and secondary (Q(B)) quinone in the reaction centers of many purple photosynthetic bacteria, and is almost unique in its ability to establish the necessary redox free energy gap for 1-electron transfer between them. The role of the methoxy substitution in this requirement was examined using monomethoxy analogues of ubiquinone-4 - 2-methoxy-3,5-dimethyl-6-isoprenyl-1,4-benzoquinone (2-MeO-Q) and 3-methoxy-2,5-dimethyl-6-isoprenyl-1,4-benzoquinone (3-MeO-Q). Only 2-MeO-Q was able to simultaneously act as Q(A) and Q(B) and the necessary redox potential tuning was shown to occur in the Q(B) site. In the absence of active Q(B), the IR spectrum of the monomethoxy quinones was examined in vitro and in the Q(A) site, and a novel distinction between the two methoxy groups was tentatively identified, consistent with the unique role of the 2-methoxy group in distinguishing Q(A) and Q(B) functionality.     

Redox potential of the non-heme iron complex in bacterial photosynthetic reaction center

In bacterial photosynthetic reaction centers (bRC), the electron is transferred from the special pair (P) via accessory bacteriochlorophyll (B(A)), bacteriopheopytin (H(A)), the primary quinone (Q(A)) to the secondary quinone (Q(B)). Although the non-heme iron complex (Fe complex) is located between Q(A) and Q(B), it was generally supposed not to be redox-active. Involvement of the Fe complex in electron transfer (ET) was proposed in recent FTIR studies [A. Remy and K. Gerwert, Coupling of light-induced electron transfer to proton uptake in photosynthesis, Nat. Struct. Biol. 10 (2003) 637-644]. However, other FTIR studies resulted in opposite results [J. Breton, Steady-state FTIR spectra of the photoreduction of Q(A) and Q(B) in Rhodobacter sphaeroides reaction centers provide evidence against the presence of a proposed transient electron acceptor X between the two quinones, Biochemistry 46 (2007) 4459-4465]. In this study, we calculated redox potentials of Q(A/B) (E(m)(Q(A/B))) and the Fe complex (E(m)(Fe)) based on crystal structure of the wild-type bRC (WT-bRC), and we investigated the energetics of the system where the Fe complex is assumed to be involved in the ET. E(m)(Fe) in WT-bRC is much less pH-dependent than that in PSII. In WT-bRC, we observed significant coupling of ET with Glu-L212 protonation upon oxidation of the Fe complex and a dramatic E(m)(Fe) downshift by 230 mV upon formation of Q(A)(-) (but not Q(B)(-)) due to the absence of proton uptake of Glu-L212. Changes in net charges of the His ligands of the Fe complex appear to be the nature of the redox event if we assume the involvement of the Fe complex in the ET.     

Triplet state of the primary donor in reaction centers of the phototrophic bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides R26 with active photoinduced electron transfer

EPR characteristics of transient paramagnetic states photoinduced in isolated reaction centers of Rhodobacter sphaeroides R26 with intact electron transfer have been studied. It was demonstrated that the detected weak triplet state EPR signal belongs to the primary donor molecule and is populated via the conventional mechanism of radical pair S-T0 mixing. The distortion of the spectral shape of this signal is explained by the triplet quantum yield anisotropy brought about by the short lifetime of precursor radical pairs. The angular dependence of the anisotropy was evaluated. It was shown that the spectral shape of the triplet state of photosystem II reaction center observed in the case of singly-reduced primary quinone acceptor can also be described by the anisotropic quantum yield of the triplet, with practically the same angular dependence. These properties confirm the conclusions on the mechanism of photoinduced electron transfer in photosystem II, made in previous publications. The peculiarities in the functioning of photosystem II reaction centers are probably determined by strict limitations on the triplet state generation.     

Electrostatic role of the non-heme iron complex in bacterial photosynthetic reaction center

To elucidate the role of the non-heme iron complex (Fe-complex) in the electron transfer (ET) events of bacterial photosynthetic reaction centers (bRC), we calculated redox potentials of primary/secondary quinones Q(A/B) (E(m)(Q(A/B))) in the Fe-depleted bRC. Removing the Fe-complex, the calculated E(m)(Q(A/B)) are downshifted by approximately 220 mV/ approximately 80 mV explaining both the 15-fold decrease in ET rate from bacteriopheophytin (H(A)(-)) to Q(A) and triplet state occurrence in Fe-depleted bRC. The larger downshift in E(m)(Q(A)) relative to E(m)(Q(B)) increases the driving-energy for ET from Q(A) to Q(B) by 140 meV, in agreement with approximately 100 meV increase derived from kinetic studies.     

On the mechanism of photoinduced electron transfer in photosystem II reaction centers

The EPR spectrum of the triplet state of photosystem II reaction centers has been studied in the case of the singly reduced primary acceptor complex QAFe2+. It was demonstrated that the shape of the spectrum does not change much when the relaxation of the primary acceptor is accelerated and when magnetic interaction between the reduced quinone molecule QA and the non-heme iron Fe2+ is disrupted. This observation confirms the earlier conclusion that the anomalous shape of the EPR spectrum is due mainly to the anisotropy of the quatum yield of the triplet state. A scheme of primary events in photosystem II is discussed, which is consistent with the observed properties of the EPR spectrum of the triplet state.     

Influence of the redox potential of the primary quinone electron acceptor on photoinhibition in photosystem II

We report the characterization of the effects of the A249S mutation located within the binding pocket of the primary quinone electron acceptor, Q(A), in the D2 subunit of photosystem II in Thermosynechococcus elongatus. This mutation shifts the redox potential of Q(A) by approximately -60 mV. This mutant provides an opportunity to test the hypothesis, proposed earlier from herbicide-induced redox effects, that photoinhibition (light-induced damage of the photosynthetic apparatus) is modulated by the potential of Q(A). Thus the influence of the redox potential of Q(A) on photoinhibition was investigated in vivo and in vitro. Compared with the wild-type, the A249S mutant showed an accelerated photoinhibition and an increase in singlet oxygen production. Measurements of thermoluminescence and of the fluorescence yield decay kinetics indicated that the charge-separated state involving Q(A) was destabilized in the A249S mutant. These findings support the hypothesis that a decrease in the redox potential of Q(A) causes an increase in singlet oxygen-mediated photoinhibition by favoring the back-reaction route that involves formation of the reaction center chlorophyll triplet. The kinetics of charge recombination are interpreted in terms of a dynamic structural heterogeneity in photosystem II that results in high and low potential forms of Q(A). The effect of the A249S mutation seems to reflect a shift in the structural equilibrium favoring the low potential form.     

Oxidation of the non-heme iron complex in photosystem II

In photosystem II (PSII), the redox properties of the non-heme iron complex (Fe complex) are sensitive to the redox state of quinones (Q(A/)(B)), which may relate to the electron/proton transfer. We calculated the redox potentials for one-electron oxidation of the Fe complex in PSII [E(m)(Fe)] based on the reference value E(m)(Fe) = +400 mV at pH 7 in the Q(A)(0)Q(B)(0) state, considering the protein environment in atomic detail and the associated changes in protonation pattern. Our model yields the pH dependence of E(m)(Fe) with -60 mV/pH as observed in experimental redox titration. We observed significant deprotonation at D1-Glu244 in the hydrophilic loop region upon Fe complex oxidation. The calculated pK(a) value for D1-Glu244 depends on the Fe complex redox state, yielding a pK(a) of 7.5 and 5.5 for Fe(2+) and Fe(3+), respectively. To account for the pH dependence of E(m)(Fe), a model involving not only D1-Glu244 but also the other titratable residues (five Glu in the D-de loops and six basic residues near the Fe complex) seems to be needed, implying the existence of a network of residues serving as an internal proton reservoir. Reduction of Q(A/B) yields +302 mV and +268 mV for E(m)(Fe) in the Q(A)(-)Q(B)(0) and Q(A)(0)Q(B)(-) states, respectively. Upon formation of the Q(A)(0)Q(B)(-) state, D1-His252 becomes protonated. Forming Fe(3+)Q(B)H(2) by a proton-coupled electron transfer process from the initial state Fe(2+)Q(B)(-) results in deprotonation of D1-His252. The two EPR signals observed at g = 1.82 and g = 1.9 in the Fe(2+)Q(A)(-) state of PSII may be attributed to D1-His252 with variable and fixed protonation, respectively.     

A motif for quinone binding sites in respiratory and photosynthetic systems

Many of the membrane-bound protein complexes of respiratory and photosynthetic systems are reactive with quinones. To date, no clear structural relationship between sites that bind quinone has been defined, apart from that in the homologous family of "type II" photosynthetic reaction centres. We show here that a structural element containing a weak sequence motif is common to the Q(A) and Q(B) sites of bacterial reaction centres and the Q(i) site of the mitochondrial bc(1) complex. Analyses of sequence databases indicate that this element may also be present in the PsaA/B subunits of photosystem I, in the ND4 and ND5 subunits of complex I and, possibly, in the mitochondrial alternative quinol oxidase. This represents a first step in the structural classification of quinone binding sites.     

Triplet state of the primary donor in reaction centers of the phototrophic bacterium <Emphasis Type="Italic">Rhodobacter sphaeroides</Emphasis> R26 with active photoinduced electron transfer

EPR characteristics of transient paramagnetic states photoinduced in isolated reaction centers of Rhodobacter sphaeroides R26 with intact electron transfer have been studied. It was demonstrated that the detected weak triplet state EPR signal belongs to the primary donor molecule and is populated via the conventional mechanism of radical pair S-T₀ mixing. The distortion of the spectral shape of this signal is explained by the triplet quantum yield anisotropy brought about by the short lifetime of precursor radical pairs. The angular dependence of the anisotropy was evaluated. It was shown that the spectral shape of the triplet state of photosystem II reaction center observed in the case of singly-reduced primary quinone acceptor can also be described by the anisotropic quantum yield of the triplet, with practically the same angular dependence. These properties confirm the conclusions on the mechanism of photoinduced electron transfer in photosystem II, made in previous publications. The peculiarities in the functioning of photosystem II reaction centers are probably determined by strict limitations on the triplet state generation.