In vitro studies of DNA mismatch repair proteins

The ability to monitor and characterize DNA mismatch repair activity in various mammalian cells is important for understanding mechanisms involved in mutagenesis and tumorigenesis. Since mismatch repair proteins recognize mismatches containing both normal and chemically altered or damaged bases, in vitro assays must accommodate a variety of mismatches in different sequence contexts. Here we describe the construction of DNA mismatch substrates containing G:T or O⁶meG:T mismatches, the purification of recombinant native human MutSα (MSH2–MSH6) and MutLα (MLH1–PMS2) proteins, and in vitro mismatch repair and excision assays that can be adapted to study mismatch repair in nuclear extracts from mismatch repair proficient and deficient cells.     

Effect of base pair mismatches on recombination via the RecBCD pathway

Summary The effect of base pair mismatches on recombination via the RecBCD pathway was studied in mutS and wild-type Escherichia coli, using substrates that contain single or multiple mismatches. Recombination between homologous DNA inserts in lambda phage and pBR322-derived plasmids forms phage-plasmid cointegrates that result from an odd number of crossovers. In the mutS host, when the sequence homology of a pair of 405 bp substrates decreased from 100% to 89%, the recombinant frequency decreased by about 9-fold, while in the wild-type host the decrease was about 240-fold. These results suggest that multiple mismatches can reduce recombinant frequencies by impeding the mechanism of recombination itself, and by provoking mismatch repair. Single mismatches in 31 bp substrates caused reductions in recombinant frequencies of 2-or 12-fold, depending on the location of the mismatch. However, unlike the reduction by multiple mismatches, the reduction of the recombinant frequencies by single mismatches was the same in both mutS and wild-type hosts. Thus a single match repair seems unable to act on single mismatches in very short homologies during recombination.     

A DNA repair process in Escherichia coli corrects U:G and T:G mismatches to C:G at sites of cytosine methylation

Escherichia coli contains a base mismatch correction system called VSP repair that is known to correct T:G mismatches to C:G when they occur in certain sequence contexts. The preferred sequence context for this process is the site for methylation by the E. coli DNA cytosine methylase (Dcm). For this reason, VSP repair is thought to counteract potential mutagenic effects of deamination of 5-methylcytosine to thymine. We have developed a genetic reversion assay that quantitates the frequency of C to T mutations at Dcm sites and the removal of such mutations by DNA repair processes. Using this assay, we have studied the repair of U: G mismatches in DNA to C: G and have found that VSP repair is capable of correcting these mismatches. Although VSP repair substantially affects the reversion frequency, it may not be as efficient at correcting U: G mismatches as the uracil DNA glycosylase-mediated repair process.     

Detection of high-affinity and sliding clamp modes for MSH2-MSH6 by single-molecule unzipping force analysis

Mismatch repair (MMR) is initiated by MutS family proteins (MSH) that recognize DNA mismatches and recruit downstream repair factors. We used a single-molecule DNA-unzipping assay to probe interactions between S. cerevisiae MSH2-MSH6 and a variety of DNA mismatch substrates. This work revealed a high-specificity binding state of MSH proteins for mismatch DNA that was not observed in bulk assays and allowed us to measure the affinity of MSH2-MSH6 for mismatch DNA as well as its footprint on DNA surrounding the mismatch site. Unzipping analysis with mismatch substrates containing an end blocked by lac repressor allowed us to identify MSH proteins present on DNA between the mismatch and the block, presumably in an ATP-dependent sliding clamp mode. These studies provide a high-resolution approach to study MSH interactions with DNA mismatches and supply evidence to support and refute different models proposed for initiation steps in MMR.     

Single molecule studies of DNA mismatch repair

DNA mismatch repair, which involves is a widely conserved set of proteins, is essential to limit genetic drift in all organisms. The same system of proteins plays key roles in many cancer related cellular transactions in humans. Although the basic process has been reconstituted in vitro using purified components, many fundamental aspects of DNA mismatch repair remain hidden due in part to the complexity and transient nature of the interactions between the mismatch repair proteins and DNA substrates. Single molecule methods offer the capability to uncover these transient but complex interactions and allow novel insights into mechanisms that underlie DNA mismatch repair. In this review, we discuss applications of single molecule methodology including electron microscopy, atomic force microscopy, particle tracking, FRET, and optical trapping to studies of DNA mismatch repair. These studies have led to formulation of mechanistic models of how proteins identify single base mismatches in the vast background of matched DNA and signal for their repair.     

Short-patch correction of C/C mismatches in human cells

We examined whether the human nucleotide excision repair complex, which is specialized on the removal of bulky DNA adducts, also displays a correcting activity on base mismatches. The cytosine/cytosine (C/C) lesion was used as a model substrate to monitor the correction of base mismatches in human cells. Fibroblasts with different repair capabilities were transfected with shuttle vectors that contain a site-directed C/C mismatch in the replication origin, accompanied by an additional C/C mismatch in one of the flanking sequences that are not essential for replication. Analysis of the vector progeny obtained from these doubly modified substrates revealed that C/C mismatches were eliminated before DNA synthesis not only in the repair-proficient background, but also when the target cells carried a genetic defect in long-patch mismatch repair, in nucleotide excision repair, or when both pathways were deleted. Furthermore, cells deficient for long-patch mismatch repair as well as a cell line that combines mismatch and nucleotide excision repair defects were able to correct multiple C/C mispairs, placed at distances of 21–44 nt, in an independent manner, such that the removal of each lesion led to individual repair patches. These results support the existence of a concurrent short-patch mechanism that rectifies C/C mismatches.     

Efficient incorporation of large (>2 kb) heterologies into heteroduplex DNA: Pms1/Msh2-dependent and -independent large loop mismatch repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair in yeast is effected primarily by gene conversion. Conversion can conceivably result from gap repair or from mismatch repair of heteroduplex DNA (hDNA) in recombination intermediates. Mismatch repair is normally very efficient, but unrepaired mismatches segregate in the next cell division, producing sectored colonies. Conversion of small heterologies (single-base differences or insertions <15 bp) in meiosis and mitosis involves mismatch repair of hDNA. The repair of larger loop mismatches in plasmid substrates or arising by replication slippage is inefficient and/or independent of Pms1p/Msh2p-dependent mismatch repair. However, large insertions convert readily (without sectoring) during meiotic recombination, raising the question of whether large insertions convert by repair of large loop mismatches or by gap repair. We show that insertions of 2.2 and 2.6 kbp convert efficiently during DSB-induced mitotic recombination, primarily by Msh2p- and Pms1p-dependent repair of large loop mismatches. These results support models in which Rad51p readily incorporates large heterologies into hDNA. We also show that large heterologies convert more frequently than small heterologies located the same distance from an initiating DSB and propose that this reflects Msh2-independent large loop-specific mismatch repair biased toward loop loss.     

Acetylation regulates DNA repair mechanisms in human cells

The p300-mediated acetylation of enzymes involved in DNA repair and replication has been previously shown to stimulate or inhibit their activities in reconstituted systems. To explore the role of acetylation on DNA repair in cells we constructed plasmid substrates carrying inactivating damages in the EGFP reporter gene, which should be repaired in cells through DNA mismatch repair (MMR) or base excision repair (BER) mechanisms. We analyzed efficiency of repair within these plasmid substrates in cells exposed to deacetylase and acetyltransferase inhibitors, and also in cells deficient in p300 acetyltransferase. Our results indicate that protein acetylation improves DNA mismatch repair in MMR-proficient HeLa cells and also in MMR-deficient HCT116 cells. Moreover, results suggest that stimulated repair of mismatches in MMR-deficient HCT116 cells is done though a strand-displacement synthesis mechanism described previously for Okazaki fragments maturation and also for the EXOI-independent pathway of MMR. Loss of p300 reduced repair of mismatches in MMR-deficient cells, but did not have evident effects on BER mechanisms, including the long patch BER pathway. Hypoacetylation of the cells in the presence of acetyltransferase inhibitor, garcinol generally reduced efficiency of BER of 8-oxoG damage, indicating that some steps in the pathway are stimulated by acetylation.     

Escherichia coli mutY-dependent mismatch repair involves DNA polymerase I and a short repair tract

Repair of heteroduplex DNA containing an A/G mismatch in a mutL background requires the Escherichia coli mutY gene function. The mutY-dependent in vitro repair of A/G mismatches is accompanied by repair DNA synthesis on the DNA strand bearing mispaired adenines. The size of the mufY-dependent repair tract was measured by the specific incorporation of -[³²P]dCTP into different restriction fragments of the repaired DNA. The repair tract is shorter than 12 nucleotides and longer than 5 nucleotides and is localized to the 3 side of the mismatched adenine. This repair synthesis is carried out by DNA polymerase I.     

Lack of correlation between binding of Eco RII methyltransferase to DNA duplexes containing mismatches and the promotion of C to T mutations

The cytosine methyltransferases (MTases) M. HhaIand M. HpaII bind substrates in which the target cytosine is replaced by uracil or thymine, i.e. DNA containing a U:G or a T:G mismatch. We have extended this observation to the EcoRII MTase (M. EcoRII) and determined the apparent K_d for binding. Using a genetic assay we have also tested the possibility that MTase binding to U:G mismatches may interfere with repair of the mismatches and promote C:G to T:A mutations. We have compared two mutants of M. EcoRII that are defective for catalysis by the wild-type enzyme for their ability to bind DNA containing U:G or T:G mismatches and for their ability to promote C to T mutations. We find that although all three proteins are able to bind DNAs with mismatches, only the wild-type enzyme promotes C:G to T:A mutations in vivo. Therefore, the ability of M. EcoRII to bind U:G mismatched duplexes is not sufficient for their mutagenic action in cells. Received: 14 November 1996 / Accepted: 17 February 1997     

Frame-shift mutants induced by quinacrine are recognized by the mismatch repair system in Streptococcus pneumoniae

Summary We describe the isolation of amethopterin-resistant mutants induced by quinacrine treatment of exponentially growing cultures of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Only mutants located by recombination analysis in a few hundred base pairs were further studied. They were cloned and their DNA sequences show that most of them are ±1-base frame-shift mutants. They are excised and repaired to a degree similar to transition mutants (low efficiency class), suggesting that the mismatches resulting from a transition or a ±1-base mutation are similar substrates for the Hex mismatch repair system.     

Methyl directed DNA mismatch repair inVibrio cholerae

Mismatches in DNA occur either due to replication error or during recombination between homologous but non-identical DNA sequences or due to chemical modification of bases. The mismatch in DNA, if not repaired, result in high spontaneous mutation frequency. The repair has to be in the newly synthesized strand of the DNA molecule, otherwise the error will be fixed permanently. Three distinct mechanisms have been proposed for the repair of mismatches in DNA in prokaryotic cells and gene functions involved in these repair processes have been identified. The methyl-directed DNA mismatch repair has been examined inVibrio cholerae, a highly pathogenic gram negative bacterium and the causative agent of the diarrhoeal disease cholera. The DNA adenine methyltransferase encoding gene (dam) of this organism which is involved in strand discrimination during the repair process has been cloned and the complete nucleotide sequence has been determined.Vibrio cholerae dam gene codes for a 21.5 kDa protein and can substitute for theEscherichia coli enzyme. Overproduction ofVibrio cholerae Dam protein is neither hypermutable nor lethal both in Escherichia coli andVibrio cholerae. WhileEscherichia coli dam mutants are sensitive to 2-aminopurine,Vibrio cholerae 2-aminopurine sensitive mutants have been isolated with intact GATC methylation activity. The mutator genesmutS andmutL involved in the recognition of mismatch have been cloned, nucleotide sequence determined and their products characterized. Mutants ofmutS andmutL ofVibrio cholerae have been isolated and show high rate of spontaneous mutation frequency. ThemutU gene ofVibrio cholerae, the product of which is a DNA helicase II, codes for a 70 kDa protein. The deduced amino acid sequence of themutU gene hs all the consensus helicase motifs. The DNA cytosine methyltransferase encoding gene (dam) ofVibrio cholerae has also been cloned. Thedcm gene codes for a 53 kDa protein. This gene product might be involved in very short patch (VSP) repair of DNA mismatches. The vsr gene which is directly involved in VSP repair process codes for a 23 kDa protein. Using these information, the status of DNA mismatch repair inVibrio cholerae will be discussed.     

A DNA repair process in Escherichia coli corrects U:G and T:G mismatches to C:G at sites of cytosine methylation

Escherichia coli contains a base mismatch correction system called VSP repair that is known to correct T:G mismatches to C:G when they occur in certain sequence contexts. The preferred sequence context for this process is the site for methylation by the E. coli DNA cytosine methylase (Dcm). For this reason, VSP repair is thought to counteract potential mutagenic effects of deamination of 5-methylcytosine to thymine. We have developed a genetic reversion assay that quantitates the frequency of C to T mutations at Dcm sites and the removal of such mutations by DNA repair processes. Using this assay, we have studied the repair of U: G mismatches in DNA to C: G and have found that VSP repair is capable of correcting these mismatches. Although VSP repair substantially affects the reversion frequency, it may not be as efficient at correcting U: G mismatches as the uracil DNA glycosylase-mediated repair process.     

Processing of mispaired and unpaired bases in heteroduplex DNA in E. coli

Bacteriophage lambda and phi X 174 DNAs, carrying sequenced mutations, have been used to construct in vitro defined species of heteroduplex DNA. Such heteroduplex DNAs were introduced by transfection, as single copies, into E. coli host cells. The progeny of individual heteroduplex molecules from each infective center was analyzed. The effect of the presence of GATC sequences (phi X 174 system) and of their methylation (lambda system) was tested. The following conclusions can be drawn: some mismatched base pairs trigger the process of mismatch repair, causing a localized strand-to-strand information transfer in heteroduplex DNA: transition mismatches G:T and A:C are efficiently repaired, whereas the six transversion mismatches are not always readily recognized and/or repaired. The recognition of transversion mismatches appears to depend on the neighbouring nucleotide sequence; single unpaired bases (frameshift mutation "mismatches") are recognized and repaired, some equally efficiently on both strands (longer and shorter), some more efficiently on the shorter (-1) strand; large non-homologies (about 800 bases) are not repaired by the Mut H, L, S, U system, but some other process repairs the non-homology with a relatively low efficiency; full methylation of GATC sequences inhibits mismatch repair on the methylated strand: this is the chemical basis of strand discrimination (old/new) in mismatch correction; unmethylated GATC sequences appear to improve mismatch repair of a G:T mismatch in phi X 174 DNA, but there may be some residual mismatch repair in GATC-free phi X 174, at least for some mismatches.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Single-molecule multiparameter fluorescence spectroscopy reveals directional MutS binding to mismatched bases in DNA

Mismatch repair (MMR) corrects replication errors such as mismatched bases and loops in DNA. The evolutionarily conserved dimeric MMR protein MutS recognizes mismatches by stacking a phenylalanine of one subunit against one base of the mismatched pair. In all crystal structures of G:T mismatch-bound MutS, phenylalanine is stacked against thymine. To explore whether these structures reflect directional mismatch recognition by MutS, we monitored the orientation of Escherichia coli MutS binding to mismatches by FRET and anisotropy with steady state, pre-steady state and single-molecule multiparameter fluorescence measurements in a solution. The results confirm that specifically bound MutS bends DNA at the mismatch. We found additional MutS-mismatch complexes with distinct conformations that may have functional relevance in MMR. The analysis of individual binding events reveal significant bias in MutS orientation on asymmetric mismatches (G:T versus T:G, A:C versus C:A), but not on symmetric mismatches (G:G). When MutS is blocked from binding a mismatch in the preferred orientation by positioning asymmetric mismatches near the ends of linear DNA substrates, its ability to authorize subsequent steps of MMR, such as MutH endonuclease activation, is almost abolished. These findings shed light on prerequisites for MutS interactions with other MMR proteins for repairing the appropriate DNA strand.     

Removal of N-6-methyladenine by the nucleotide excision repair pathway triggers the repair of mismatches in yeast gap-repair intermediates

Gap-repair assays have been an important tool for studying the genetic control of homologous recombination in yeast. Sequence analysis of recombination products derived when a gapped plasmid is diverged relative to the chromosomal repair template additionally has been used to infer structures of strand-exchange intermediates. In the absence of the canonical mismatch repair pathway, mismatches present in these intermediates are expected to persist and segregate at the next round of DNA replication. In a mismatch repair defective (mlh1Δ) background, however, we have observed that recombination-generated mismatches are often corrected to generate gene conversion or restoration events. In the analyses reported here, the source of the aberrant mismatch removal during gap repair was examined. We find that most mismatch removal is linked to the methylation status of the plasmid used in the gap-repair assay. Whereas more than half of Dam-methylated plasmids had patches of gene conversion and/or restoration interspersed with unrepaired mismatches, mismatch removal was observed in less than 10% of products obtained when un-methylated plasmids were used in transformation experiments. The methylation-linked removal of mismatches in recombination intermediates was due specifically to the nucleotide excision repair pathway, with such mismatch removal being partially counteracted by glycosylases of the base excision repair pathway. These data demonstrate that nucleotide excision repair activity is not limited to bulky, helix-distorting DNA lesions, but also targets removal of very modest perturbations in DNA structure. In addition to its effects on mismatch removal, methylation reduced the overall gap-repair efficiency, but this reduction was not affected by the status of excision repair pathways. Finally, gel purification of DNA prior to transformation reduced gap-repair efficiency four-fold in a nucleotide excision repair-defective background, indicating that the collateral introduction of UV damage can potentially compromise genetic interpretations.     

Characterization of palindromic loop mismatch repair tracts in mammalian cells

Single- and multi-base (loop) mismatches can arise in DNA by replication errors, during recombination, and by chemical modification of DNA. Single-base and loop mismatches of several nucleotides are efficiently repaired in mammalian cells by a nick-directed, MSH2-dependent mechanism. Larger loop mismatches (> or =12 bases) are repaired by an MSH2-independent mechanism. Prior studies have shown that 12- and 14-base palindromic loops are repaired with bias toward loop retention, and that repair bias is eliminated when five single-base mismatches flank the loop mismatch. Here we show that one single-base mismatch near a 12-base palindromic loop is sufficient to eliminate loop repair bias in wild-type, but not MSH2-defective mammalian cells. We also show that palindromic loop and single-base mismatches separated by 12 bases are repaired independently at least 10% of the time in wild-type cells, and at least 30% of the time in MSH2-defective cells. Palindromic loop and single-base mismatches separated by two bases were never repaired independently. These and other data indicate that loop repair tracts are variable in length. All tracts extend at least 2 bases, some extend <12 bases, and others >12 bases, on one side of the loop. These properties distinguish palindromic loop mismatch repair from the three known excision repair pathways: base excision repair which has one to six base tracts, nucleotide excision repair which has approximately 30 base tracts, and MSH2-dependent mismatch repair, which has tracts that extend for several hundred bases.     

DnaN clamp zones provide a platform for spatiotemporal coupling of mismatch detection to DNA replication

Mismatch repair (MMR) increases the fidelity of DNA replication by identifying and correcting replication errors. Processivity clamps are vital components of DNA replication and MMR, yet the mechanism and extent to which they participate in MMR remains unclear. We investigated the role of the Bacillus subtilis processivity clamp DnaN, and found that it serves as a platform for mismatch detection and coupling of repair to DNA replication. By visualizing functional MutS fluorescent fusions in vivo, we find that MutS forms foci independent of mismatch detection at sites of replication (i.e. the replisome). These MutS foci are directed to the replisome by DnaN clamp zones that aid mismatch detection by targeting the search to nascent DNA. Following mismatch detection, MutS disengages from the replisome, facilitating repair. We tested the functional importance of DnaN‐mediated mismatch detection for MMR, and found that it accounts for 90% of repair. This high dependence on DnaN can be bypassed by increasing MutS concentration within the cell, indicating a secondary mode of detection in vivo whereby MutS directly finds mismatches without associating with the replisome. Overall, our results provide new insight into the mechanism by which DnaN couples mismatch recognition to DNA replication in living cells.     

A model for initial DNA lesion recognition by NER and MMR based on local conformational flexibility

Initial recognition of DNA damage is the crucial but poorly understood first step in DNA repair by the human nucleotide excision repair(NER) and mismatch repair (MMR) systems. Failure by NER or MMR to recognize DNA damage threatens the genetic integrity of the organism and may play a role in carcinogenesis. Both NER and MMR recognize and repair a wide variety of structurally dissimilar lesions against the background of normal DNA. Previous studies have suggested that detection of thermodynamic destabilization of DNA caused by covalent damage and base mismatches is a potential mechanism by which repair pathways with broad specificity such as NER and MMR recognize their substrates. However, both NER and MMR respectively, repair a wide variety of stabilizing and destabilizing covalent DNA lesions and base pair mismatches. A common feature of lesions that are both thermodynamically stabilizing and destabilizing is the alteration of the local DNA flexibility (dynamics). In this review we describe the experimental evidence for altered dynamics from NMR and thermodynamic studies on normal and damaged DNA molecules with respect to recognition by NER and MMR. Based on these data, we propose a model for initial detection of lesions by both NER and MMR that occurs through an indirect readout mechanism of alternative DNA conformations induced by covalent damage and base mismatches.     

The cellular mismatch repair system is able to repair mismatches within MLV retroviral double-stranded DNA at a low frequency

Eukaryotic cells possess several distinct mismatch repair pathways. A mismatch can be introduced in retroviral double-stranded DNA by a pre-existing mutation within the primer binding site (PBS) of the viral RNA genome. In order to evaluate mismatch repair of retroviral double-stranded DNA, Moloney leukemia virus (MLV)-based vectors with a mutation in their PBS were used to infect mismatch repair-competent as well as mismatch repair-deficient cell lines. If the target cells were capable of repairing the mismatch before an infected cell divided, the mismatch within the PBS could be repaired to the wild-type or mutant PBS. If the target cells were unable to repair the mismatch, half the cells in the colony should contain the mutant PBS while the other half should contain the wild-type PBS. To evaluate these predictions, individual colonies were isolated and analyzed by PCR. Almost all mismatch-deficient cell colonies analyzed (cell lines HCT 116 and PMS2–/–) contained both the wild-type and mutated PBS, therefore, mismatches within retroviral double-strand DNA could not be repaired by the mismatch-deficient cells. In contrast, mismatches in ~25% of the mismatch repair-competent cell clones analyzed (cell lines HeLa and PMS2+/+) were repaired, while 75% were not. Therefore, the cellular mismatch repair system is able to repair mismatches within viral double-stranded DNA, but at a low frequency.