A continuous, farm-scale, solid-phase fermentation process for fuel ethanol and protein feed production from fodder beets

Fuel ethanol (95%) was produced from fodder beets in two farm-scale processes. In the first process, involving conventional submerged fermentation of the fodder beets in a mash, ethanol and a feed (PF) rich in protein, fat, and fiber were produced. Ethanol yields of 70 L/metric ton (7 gal/ton) were obtained; however, resulting beers had low ethanol concentrations [3-5% (v/v)]. The high viscosity of medium and low sugar, beet mashes caused mixing problems which prevented any further increase of beet sugar in the mash. The severely limited the maximum attainable ethanol concentration during fermentation, thereby making the beer costly to distill into fuel ethanol and the process energy inefficient. In order to achieve distillably worthwhile ethanol concentrations of 8-10% (v/v), we developed and tested a solid-phase fermentation process (continuous). In preliminary trials, this system produced fermented pulp with over 8% (v/v) ethanol corresponding to an ethanol yield of 87 L/metric ton (21 gal/ton). Production costs with this novel process are $0.47/L ($1.77/gal) and the energy balance is 2.11. These preliminary cost estimates indicate that fodder beets are potentially competitive with corn as an ethanol feedstock. Additional research, however, is warranted to more precisely refine individual costs, energy balances and the actual value of the PF.     

Semicontinuous diffusion fermentation of fodder beets for fuel ethanol and cubed protein feed production

A novel, semicontinuous diffusion fermentation system was used to produce fuel ethanol and a cubed protein feed (CPF) from fodder beets at an intermediate scale. In the process, fodder beet cubes were augered diagonally upward against a flow of 0.26N H(2)SO(4) and yeast in a tubular fermentor. Exiting one end of the fermentor was CPF, while fermented beer [6-9% (v/v) ethanol] exited the other end. Retention times for beer and CPF were 264 and 72 h, respectively. Contamination was controlled by maintaining the fermentation pH between 2.1 and 2.6 using H(2)SO(4). Production costs for a greatly scaled-up (times 1400) conceptual version of this system (using a continuous rather than a semicontinuous processing mode) were projected by calculation to be $0.529/L for 95% ethanol (net of a $0.112/L credit for CPF). The calculated energy balance (energy output-energy input ratio) was estimated to be 3.04. In calculating the energy balance, the output energy of the CPF and input energy for growing the fodder beets were not included. A design for the scaled-up plant is provided.     

Ethanol production from fodder beets

Various yeasts such as two strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Saccharomyces diastaticus, and Kluyveromyces marxianus were investigated for their ability to ferment fodder beet juice to alcohol. Juice extracted from fodder beet roots without any additives was used as a fermentation substrate. The fermentation kinetic parameters were determined and compared for each species of yeast tested. The best species for fodder beet juice fermentation was chosen and products obtained by fermentation of one hectare of fodder beet plants are given.     

Effect of fodder beet cube size on ethanol production via diffusion fermentation

Summary The size of fodder beet cubes used to produce fuel ethanol via diffusion fermentation was varied to see how this affected various fermentation parameters. The highest yeast populations, shortest fermentation times, and highest ethanol yields and fermentation efficiencies were observed when 2.54 cm square cubes (or smaller) were utilized. Ethanol concentrations here averaged 4.21% (v/v) while the highest concentration reached was 4.83%. To minimize energy for slicing beets and still optimize yields, cubes of 1.91–2.54 cm should be used.     

Optimization of fermentation conditions for ethanol production from whey

Summary Optimal conditions for ethanol production in 7% whey solutions by the yeast Candida pseudotropicalis ATCC 8619 included initial pH of 4.57 and 30°C. Complete fermentation of the available lactose took place without supplementary nutrients; additions of nitrogen or phosphorus salts, yeast extract or corn steep liquor resulted in increased yeast production and lower ethanol yields. A positive correlation was observed between increases in yeast inocula and lactose utilization and ethanol production rates; 8.35 g/l of ethanol was obtained within 22 h by using yeast inoculum of 13.9 g/l. No differences in fermentation rates or ethanol yields were observed when whole or deproteinized whey solutions were used. Concentrated whey permeates, obtained after removal of the valuable proteins from whey, can be effectively fermented for ethanol production.     

海带发酵制取生物乙醇的影响因素与优化条件

针对海带的碳水化合物不易被单一菌株发酵转化为乙醇的难题,通过酸化、匀浆和消化等预处理和正交试验,利用多酶系多菌种微生物复合发酵剂的酿酒曲,研究海带发酵制取生物乙醇的影响因素与优化条件。结果表明:在预处理试验中,加入一定量的Na2CO3,可以提高海带液中还原性糖和总糖的含量;消化温度对总糖影响相对较大,而对还原性糖的影响较小;过滤不利于得到较高浓度的乙醇;在优化条件中,发酵液的初始酸碱度是最重要的,其次是发酵温度和基质浓度,发酵液体积的影响程度相对较小。在基质(海带)质量浓度为0.15 g/L、温度34℃、起始pH 6.5和发酵液体积200 mL时,可以获得最大的乙醇产量4.09 g(以100 g海带计)。     

Development of a low-cost fermentation medium for ethanol production from biomass

Nutrient cost is an important aspect in the fermentation of biomass to ethanol. With a goal of developing a cost-effective fermentation medium, several industrially available nutrient sources were evaluated for their effectiveness in the simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of pretreated poplar with Saccharomyces cerevisiae D₅A. These studies showed that a low-cost medium containing 0.3% corn steep liquor and 2.5 mM MgSO₄ · 7H₂O was similar in performance to a nutrient-rich medium. Besides its low cost, this alternative medium consists of components that are available on a commercial scale, thereby making it industrially relevant. Received: 14 August 1996 / Received revision: 7 January 1997 / Accepted: 24 January 1997     

Aeration alleviates ethanol inhibition and glycerol production during fed-batch ethanol fermentation

In this study, we investigated the effects of aeration on ethanol inhibition and glycerol production during fed-batch ethanol fermentation. When aeration was conducted at 0.13, 0.33, and 0.8 vvm, the ethanol productivity, specific ethanol production rate, and ethanol yield in the presence of greater than 100 g/L of ethanol were higher than when aeration was not conducted. In addition, estimation of the parameters (α and β) in a model equation of ethanol inhibition kinetics indicated that aeration alleviated ethanol inhibition against the specific growth rate and the specific ethanol production rate. Specifically, when aeration was conducted, the glycerol yield and specific glycerol production rate decreased approximately 50 and 70%, respectively. Finally, the results of this study indicated that aeration during fed-batch ethanol fermentation may improve the ethanol concentration in the final culture broth, as well as the ethanol productivity.     

Anaerobic bio-hydrogen production from ethanol fermentation: the role of pH

Hydrogen was produced by an ethanol-acetate fermentation at pH of 5.0 +/- 0.2 and HRT of 3 days. The yield of hydrogen was 100-200 ml g Glu(-1) with a hydrogen content of 25-40%. This fluctuation in the hydrogen yield was attributed to the formation of propionate and the activity of hydrogen utilizing methanogens. The change in the operational pH for the inhibition of this methanogenic activity induced a change in the main fermentation pathway. In this study, the main products were butyrate, ethanol and propionate, in the pH ranges 4.0-4.5, 4.5-5.0 and 5.0-6.0, respectively. However, the activity of all the microorganisms was inhibited below pH 4.0. Therefore, pH 4.0 was regarded as the operational limit for the anaerobic bio-hydrogen production process. These results indicate that the pH plays an important role in determining the type of anaerobic fermentation pathway in anaerobic bio-hydrogen processes.     

Continuous tower fermentation for power ethanol production

Summary The capability of the continuous tower fermenter to accumulate and retain high cell densities (70–90 g dry wt/1) when using naturally flocculant yeasts is demonstrated with semi-defined glucose feed at concentrations of 120–200 g/1 and high hydraulic loadings. Conversion and ethanol productivity data are given as a function of throughput and feed glucose concentration.     

Processing and fermentation of Jerusalem artichoke for ethanol production

Summary Processing and fermentation trials on Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) tubers, and on pure inulin media were carried out. Acid and thermal treatments, pure and mixed cultures of yeast, and enzyme preparations were investigated. Best ethanol yields on either substrate were obtained with pH 2 thermal treatments, resulting in 131.6 liters ethanol per metric ton fresh tuber.     

Solid-state fermentation of carob pods for ethanol production

The production of ethanol from carob pods by Saccharomyces cerevisiae in solid-state fermentation was investigated. The maximal ethanol concentration (160±3 g/kg dry pods), ethanol productivity (6.7 ± 0.2 g/kg per hour), ethanol yield (40 ± 1.8%), biomass concentration (7.5 ± 0.4 x 10⁸ cells/g carob pulp) and fermentation efficiency (80 ± 2%) were obtained at an inoculum amount of 3%, a particle size of 0.5 mm, a moisture level of 70%, a pH of 4.5 and a temperature of 30°C. Under the same fermentation conditions both sterilized and non-sterilized carob pods pulp gave the same maximum ethanol concentration.     

Solid-state fermentation of grape pomace for ethanol production

Summary Grape pomace was used as a substrate for the production of ethanol under solid-state fermentation conditions. The yield of ethanol amounted to greater than 80% of the theoretical, based on the fermentable sugar consumed.     

Optimization of fermentation parameters for production of ethanol from kinnow waste and banana peels by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation

A study was taken up to evaluate the role of some fermentation parameters like inoculum concentration, temperature, incubation period and agitation time on ethanol production from kinnow waste and banana peels by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation using cellulase and co-culture of Saccharomyces cerevisiae G and Pachysolen tannophilus MTCC 1077. Steam pretreated kinnow waste and banana peels were used as substrate for ethanol production in the ratio 4:6 (kinnow waste: banana peels). Temperature of 30°C, inoculum size of S. cerevisiae G 6% and (v/v) Pachysolen tannophilus MTCC 1077 4% (v/v), incubation period of 48 h and agitation for the first 24 h were found to be best for ethanol production using the combination of two wastes. The pretreated steam exploded biomass after enzymatic saccharification containing 63 gL⁻¹ reducing sugars was fermented with both hexose and pentose fermenting yeast strains under optimized conditions resulting in ethanol production, yield and fermentation efficiency of 26.84 gL⁻¹, 0.426 gg ⁻¹ and 83.52 % respectively. This study could establish the effective utilization of kinnow waste and banana peels for bioethanol production using optimized fermentation parameters.     

Tower fermentation using Zymomonas mobilis for ethanol production

Summary Flocculation was induced in a pure strain of the bacteria Zymomonas mobilis. When fermenting glucose to ethanol, cell densities of up to 40g/l were achieved and sustained in a 0.92 litre tower fermenter with dilution rates of up to 2.3 hr^-1. A maximum productivity of 100g EtOH/l/hr with 98% conversion of the 105g/l glucose feed was achieved. The limitation to performance with increase in throughput arose from incomplete fermentation of the feed glucose, rather than washout of the flocculated bacteria.     

Factors affecting the economics of polyhydroxyalkanoate production by bacterial fermentation

Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) have been attracting considerable attention as biodegradable substitutes for conventional polymers. To reduce their production cost, a great deal of effort has been devoted to developing better bacterial strains and more efficient fermentation/recovery processes. In this paper, several factors affecting the production cost of PHA, such as PHA productivity, content and yield, the cost of the carbon substrate, and the recovery method were reviewed. A sensitivity analysis was also carried out with respect to these factors and with a view to scale-up. Several production processes were designed on the basis of the reported fermentation and recovery results, and were economically evaluated. PHA productivity only affects equipment-related costs, but PHA content has multiple effects on the process economics. Development of an economical and efficient recovery method is also important to the overall economics of PHA production. Received: 10 August 1998 / Accepted: 26 September 1998     

Fructose syrups and ethanol production by selective fermentation of inulin

Jerusalem artichoke is a favorable substrate for inulin or fructose syrup production. The sugar content and the fructose ratio of inulin depend on various factors, particularly on the date of harvest. Incomplete fermentation of extracts by selected yeasts allows the production of inulin with increased fructose content. The yeast strains (Saccharomyces cerevisiae, S. diastaticus...) are chosen for their ability to ferment sucrose and inulin small polymers, but not easily inulin large polymers. A good increase in the fructose ratio and a good yield in residual sugars can be obtained with the better strains. After fermentation and acid or enzymatic hydrolysis, extracts from early and late harvested tubers lead to syrups of good quality containing up to 95% and 90% of fructose respectively. This fermentative enrichment process is competitive with others (for example, chromatographic enrichment), is appropriate to raw extracts, simplifies the purification steps, and also permits the simultaneous benefit of production of by-products in the form of ethanol and yeast (in addition to the pulps). Unhydrolyzed inulin polymers with high fructose content can be recovered by this selective fermentation.