Atypical subtrochanteric femoral shaft fractures: role for mechanics and bone quality

Bisphosphonates are highly effective agents for reducing osteoporotic fractures in women and men, decreasing fracture incidence at the hip and spine up to 50%. In a small subset of patients, however, these agents have recently been associated with ''atypical femoral fractures'' (AFFs) in the subtrochanteric region or the diaphysis. These fractures have several atypical characteristics, including occurrence with minimal trauma; younger age than typical osteoporotic fractures; occurrence at cortical, rather than cancellous sites; early radiographic appearance similar to that of a stress fracture; transverse fracture pattern rather than the familiar spiral or transverse-oblique morphologies; initiation on the lateral cortex; and high risk of fracture on the contralateral side, at the same location as the initial fracture. Fracture is a mechanical phenomenon that occurs when the loads applied to a structure such as a long bone exceed its load-bearing capacity, either due to a single catastrophic overload (traumatic failure) or as a result of accumulated damage and crack propagation at sub-failure loads (fatigue failure). The association of AFFs with no or minimal trauma suggests a fatigue-based mechanism that depends on cortical cross-sectional geometry and tissue material properties. In the case of AFFs, bisphosphonate treatment may alter cortical tissue properties, as these agents are known to alter bone remodeling. This review discusses the use of bisphosphonates, their effects on bone remodeling, mechanics and tissue composition, their significance as an effective therapy for osteoporosis, and why these agents may increase fracture risk in a small population of patients.     

A Case of an Unusual Subtrochanteric Fracture in a Patient Receiving Denosumab

ObjectiveBisphosphonates are the most common class of medications used to treat osteoporosis. Their widespread use has uncovered rare complications, including atypical femoral fractures (AFF). The pathogenesis of AFF is incompletely understood; however, if oversuppression of bone remodeling contributes to AFF, it is plausible that other potent antiresorptive agents, such as denosumab, could be associated with AFF as well.MethodsWe report a case of an 81-year-old woman with densitometric osteopenia, chronic kidney disease, and hyperparathyroidism, who was initiated on denosumab for elevated fracture risk. Approximately 6 months after her initial denosumab injection, she developed severe right groin and thigh pain without prior trauma.ResultsA femoral radiograph was normal, without cortical thickening, but a magnetic resonance imaging revealed a transverse subtrochanteric insufficiency fracture with a medial defect involving 25% of the femoral cortex. She did not receive any further doses of denosumab. Bone turnover markers did not suggest oversuppression. Her fracture was treated conservatively with nonweight bearing status with resultant full recovery.ConclusionThis fracture does not meet the current definition of an AFF as, for that definition, a lateral femoral location is required. This case does not provide conclusive evidence for a causal relationship between treatment with denosumab and this unusual fracture. It clearly illustrates, however, the occurrence of an unusual, nontraumatic subtrochanteric fracture in a patient treated with the potent antiresorptive agent denosumab with many features in common with bisphosphonate-associated AFF. (Endocr. Pract. 2013;19:e64-e68)     

Spontaneous incomplete transverse subtrochanteric femoral fracture with cortical thickening possibly secondary to risedronate use: a case report

ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION: Osteoporosis is an asymptomatic disease characterized by bone weakening and predisposition to fragility (insufficiency) fractures and can have devastating effects on individual life and great financial impact on the economy. Bisphosphonates are used worldwide for the primary and secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures. However, increasing evidence raises concern that bisphosphonates can be associated with atypical fractures. CASE PRESENTATION: A 65-year-old Caucasian woman on long-term steroid treatment for polymyalgia rheumatica was admitted with severe and constant pain in the right hip, radiating to the right knee. She had a history of steroid-induced osteoporosis, for which she was started on risedronate four years earlier. She had no history of trauma. Her blood results were unremarkable. Her X-rays confirmed that she had an incomplete right subtrochanteric femoral fracture. A bone scan confirmed the diagnosis and also ruled out any other associated fractures. Our patient successfully underwent internal nail fixation of the fracture. She was reviewed by a rheumatology team, which stopped the risedronate. She was started on treatment with denosumab injection. CONCLUSIONS: Previous case series have reported that long-term bisphosphonate use is associated with atypical fractures of the femur, and certain criteria have been established to help identify such rare fractures. Delayed union or non-union is expected in such fractures following definitive orthopedic treatment because of the long half life of bisphosphonates. In this case report, we try to raise questions related to this important subject, like the duration and safety of bisphosphonate use and the alternative medications used in osteoporosis in this rare condition. We consider this case report not only interesting but also important and unusual because it is about a patient who developed a potentially rare and serious side effect of long-term bisphosphonate use, estimated to affect 2.3 in every 10,000 patients, and who presented with a pelvic X-ray that showed the characteristic features of atypical fractures secondary to risedronate use. In addition, most of the documented cases have been associated with many years of bisphosphonate use whereas our patient had been on risedronate for only four years.     

Denosumab Use in Adults With Fibrous Dysplasia: Case Reports and Review of the Literature

ObjectiveIn fibrous dysplasia (FD) of the bone, a gain-of-function mutation in the G-nucleotide binding protein alpha subunit results in constitutively active cyclic adenosine monophosphate. Downstream effects include formation of disorganized cortex and bone marrow fibrosis. Patients with FD experience bone pain and are at risk of fracture. Bisphosphonates are traditionally used to manage pain with mixed results. We sought to report denosumab use in patients with FD at our institution and summarized the existing literature on denosumab use in FD.MethodsWe retrospectively identified patients with FD who were treated with denosumab at our institution, describing patient characteristics and outcomes. We reviewed the existing literature on denosumab use in patients with FD.ResultsPatient 1 was diagnosed with FD at the age of 17 years and took bisphosphonates with initial improvement in pain. Pain eventually worsened; therefore, she received 4 doses of denosumab. Patient 2 was diagnosed with FD after a fall and was treated with bisphosphonates, reporting some initial improvement in bone pain. A few years later, the pain recurred, and he received 3 doses of denosumab. Both patients tolerated denosumab well but experienced no improvement in pain. On literature review, although some serious side effects were noted, patients experienced a decline in bone turnover markers, and most reported improvement in bone pain with denosumab.ConclusionDenosumab is a promising therapy for managing symptoms of FD. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal dose and duration of treatment. Its long-term effect on FD lesions remains unclear.     

Site specific effects of zoledronic acid during tibial and mandibular fracture repair

Numerous factors can affect skeletal regeneration, including the extent of bone injury, mechanical loading, inflammation and exogenous molecules. Bisphosphonates are anticatabolic agents that have been widely used to treat a variety of metabolic bone diseases. Zoledronate (ZA), a nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate (N-BP), is the most potent bisphosphonate among the clinically approved bisphosphonates. Cases of bisphosphonate-induced osteonecrosis of the jaw have been reported in patients receiving long term N-BP treatment. Yet, osteonecrosis does not occur in long bones. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of zoledronate on long bone and cranial bone regeneration using a previously established model of non-stabilized tibial fractures and a new model of mandibular fracture repair. Contrary to tibial fractures, which heal mainly through endochondral ossification, mandibular fractures healed via endochondral and intramembranous ossification with a lesser degree of endochondral ossification compared to tibial fractures. In the tibia, ZA reduced callus and cartilage formation during the early stages of repair. In parallel, we found a delay in cartilage hypertrophy and a decrease in angiogenesis during the soft callus phase of repair. During later stages of repair, ZA delayed callus, cartilage and bone remodeling. In the mandible, ZA delayed callus, cartilage and bone remodeling in correlation with a decrease in osteoclast number during the soft and hard callus phases of repair. These results reveal a more profound impact of ZA on cartilage and bone remodeling in the mandible compared to the tibia. This may predispose mandible bone to adverse effects of ZA in disease conditions. These results also imply that therapeutic effects of ZA may need to be optimized using time and dose-specific treatments in cranial versus long bones.     

靶向治疗乳腺癌骨转移的研究进展

本文对双磷酸盐、狄诺塞麦、Sagopilone等特异性靶向药物在乳腺癌骨转移靶向治疗中的作用机制、临床应用、临床疗效等方面的相关研究进展情况进行了简要阐述。双磷酸盐在抑制骨转移和非骨转移中发挥作用,狄诺塞麦可能成为双磷酸盐的合理替代物,尤其在双磷酸盐治疗效果不佳的病人中,而新型抗癌药物Sagopilone、骨唾液酸蛋白抑制剂亦可通过多种机制参与乳腺癌转移过程,具有抑制骨转移的巨大潜力。     

Modulation of tumour-induced bone resorption by bisphosphonates.

Tumour cells produce systemic or local factors which can stimulate osteoclast development and activity leading to increased bone resorption. The clinical consequences are bone pain, fractures and hypercalcaemia. Inhibitors of osteoclast-mediated bone resorption, such as the bisphosphonates, are now the treatment of choice for tumour-induced hypercalcaemia. Recent evidence indicates that these compounds, especially the newer ones, reduce skeletal morbidity in patients with metastatic bone disease and improve their quality of life. Better understanding of the mechanisms underlying tumour-induced bone resorption and development of more potent and less toxic bisphosphonates will lead to improved management of patients with malignant diseases involving the skeleton.     

Denosumab

Denosumab is an anti-receptor activator of nuclear factor (NF)-kappaB (RANK) ligand human monoclonal antibody studied as a treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO) and bone destruction due to rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or metastatic cancers. As of February 2009, the candidate was undergoing US Food and Drug Administration review, and might be approved by October 2009. Late phase clinical trials demonstrated that denosumab possesses a similar safety profile to bisphosphonates, and that it can be either equally or more effective than bisphosphonates at preventing bone loss due to PMO, RA, or cancer treatment and metastases.     

Role of RANKL inhibition in osteoporosis

When the rate of bone resorption exceeds that of bone formation, destruction of bone tissue occurs, resulting in a fragile skeleton. The clinical consequences, namely osteoporosis and fragility fractures, are common and costly problems. Treatments that normalize the balance of bone turnover by inhibiting bone resorption preserve bone mass and reduce fracture risk. The discovery of receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappaB ligand (RANKL) as a pivotal regulator of osteoclast activity provides a new therapeutic target. Early studies have demonstrated that denosumab, an investigational, highly specific anti-RANKL antibody, rapidly and substantially reduces bone resorption. Pharmacokinetics of the antibody allow dosing by subcutaneous injection at an interval of 6 months. Inhibiting RANKL appears to be a promising new treatment for osteoporosis and related disorders. More information about the effectiveness of denosumab in reducing fracture risk, its tolerability and safety, and the response to discontinuing therapy will be provided by ongoing clinical studies.     

Recommendations on the management of fragility fracture risk in women younger than 70 years

The risk for fragility fracture represents a problem of enormous magnitude. It is estimated that only a small fraction of women with this risk take the benefit of preventive measures. The relationship between estrogen and bone mass is well known as they are the other factors related to the risk for fracture. There are precise diagnostic methods, including a tool to diagnose the risk for fracture. Yet there continues to be an under-diagnosis, with the unrecoverable delay in instituting preventive measures. Women under the age of 70 years, being much more numerous than those older, and having risk factors, are a group in which it is essential to avoid that first fragility fracture. Today it is usual not to differentiate between the treatment and the prevention of osteoporosis since the common aim is to prevent fragility fractures. Included in this are women with osteoporosis or with low bone mass and increased risk for fracture, for whom risk factors play a primary role. There is clearly controversy over the type of treatment and its duration, especially given the possible adverse effects of long-term use. This justifies the concept of sequential treatment, even more so in women under the age of 70, since they presumably will need treatment for many years. Bone metabolism is age-dependent. In postmenopausal women under 70 years of age, the increase in bone resorption is clearly predominant, related to a sharp drop in estrogens. Thus a logical treatment is the prevention of fragility fractures by hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and, in asymptomatic women, selective estradiol receptor modulators (SERMs). Afterwards, there is a period of greater resorption, albeit less intense but continuous, when one could utilise anti-resorptive treatments such as bisphosphonates or denosumab or a dual agent like strontium ranelate. Bone formation treatment, such as parathyroid hormone (PTH), in women under 70 years will be uncommon. That is because it should be used in cases where the formation is greatly diminished and there is a high risk for fracture, something found in much older women.     

Clinical usefulness of bisphosphonates in oncology: treatment of bone metastases, antitumoral activity and effect on bone resorption markers

The present article overviews the role of bisphosphonates for the treatment and prevention of bone metastases and their antiangiogenic effects and antitumoral activity. The skeleton is a frequent and clinically relevant site of metastasis in cancer patients. The major events related to bone metastases include bone pain, bone loss, hypercalcemia, spinal cord compression, and fractures. On the basis of their radiographic features, bone metastases are classified as osteoblastic, osteoclastic, or mixed. The primary goals of treatment of bone metastases are reduction of the risk of pathological fractures and other skeletal-related events, and pain control. Bisphosphonates are used to prevent pathological fractures by inhibition of osteoclasts. Recent studies suggest that bisphosphonates have some direct antitumoral activity, mainly mediated through the blockade of angiogenic pathways. Further clinical studies are needed to determine the optimal treatment duration, timing and schedule of bisphosphonates, assess their role as adjuvant therapy for the prevention of bone metastases, and establish their antiangiogenic activity in association with standard cytotoxic and hormonal drugs for treatment of patients with advanced disease.     

Switching to Denosumab or Bisphosphonates After Completion of Teriparatide Treatment in Women With Severe Postmenopausal Osteoporosis

ObjectiveTo compare bone mineral density (BMD) changes after 12 months of treatment with denosumab or bisphosphonates in postmenopausal women with severe osteoporosis after stopping teriparatide therapy.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 140 postmenopausal women (mean age, 74.2 years) with severe osteoporosis who had been treated with teriparatide for 18 to 24 months at our outpatient clinic in a tertiary endocrine center between 2006 and 2015. After stopping teriparatide therapy, they continued treatment with a bisphosphonate (alendronate, risedronate, ibandronate, or zoledronic acid) or denosumab while receiving daily vitamin D and calcium. BMD at the lumbar spine (LS), total hip (TH), and femoral neck (FN) was measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry when teriparatide therapy was discontinued (baseline) and after 12 months of further treatment. Multivariate linear regression models were used to identify the predictors of BMD gain.ResultsAfter stopping teriparatide therapy, 70 women continued treatment with bisphosphonates and 70 received denosumab. LS, but not TH or FN, BMD gain was significantly greater in the denosumab group than in the bisphosphonates group at 12 months. Multivariate analysis showed that BMD gain at the LS was negatively associated with bisphosphonate versus denosumab treatment and positively associated with baseline serum total procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide. BMD gains at the FN were predicted by higher baseline serum urate levels. BMD gains at the TH and FN were negatively associated with pretreatment BMD gains at the same site.ConclusionTwelve months after stopping teriparatide therapy, sequential denosumab treatment appeared to yield higher additional LS BMD gain on average compared with bisphosphonates treatment.     

First use of the RANKL antibody denosumab in Osteogenesis Imperfecta Type VI

Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is a genetically heterogeneous disease leading to bone fragility. OI-VI is an autosomal-recessive form caused by mutations in SERPINF1. There is experimental evidence suggesting that loss of functional SERPINF1 leads to an activation of osteoclasts via the RANK/RANKL pathway. Patients with OI-VI show a poor response to bisphosphonates. We report on four children with OI-VI who had shown continuously elevated urinary bone resorption markers during a previous treatment with bisphosphonates. We treated these children with the RANKL antibody denosumab to reduce bone resorption. Intervention and results: Denosumab (1 mg/kg body weight) was injected s.c. every 3 months. There were no severe side effects. Markers of bone resorption decreased to the normal range after each injection. N-terminal Propeptide of collagen 1 was measured in the serum during the first treatment cycle and decreased also. Urinary deoxypyridinoline/creatinine was monitored in a total of seven treatment cycles and indicated that bone resorption reached the pre-treatment level after 6-8 weeks. Conclusion: This was the first use of denosumab in children with OI-VI. Denosumab was well tolerated, and laboratory parameters provided evidence that the treatment reversibly reduced bone resorption. Therefore, denosumab may be a new therapeutic option for patients with OI-VI.     

The prevention and treatment of osteoporosis: a review

Osteoporosis is a disorder characterized by reduced bone strength, diminished bone density, and altered macrogeometry and microscopic architecture. Adult bone mass is the integral measurement of the bone mass level achieved at the peak minus the rate and duration of subsequent bone loss. There is clearly a genetic predisposition to attained peak bone mass, which occurs by a person's mid-20s. Bone loss with age and menopause are universal, but rates vary among individuals. Both peak bone mass and subsequent bone loss can be modified by environmental factors, such as nutrition, physical activity, and concomitant diseases and medications. Osteoporosis prevention requires adequate calcium and vitamin D intake, regular physical activity, and avoiding smoking and excessive alcohol ingestion. Risk of fracture determines whether medication is also warranted. A previous vertebral or hip fracture is the most important predictor of fracture risk. Bone density is the best predictor of fracture risk for those without prior adult fractures. Age, weight, certain medications, and family history also help establish a person's risk for osteoporotic fractures. All women should have a bone density test by the age of 65 or younger (at the time of menopause) if risk factors are present. Guidelines for men are currently in development. Medications include both antiresorptive and anabolic types. Antiresorptive medications--estrogens, selective estrogen receptor modulators (raloxifene), bisphosphonates (alendronate, risedronate, and ibandronate) and calcitonins--work by reducing rates of bone remodeling. Teriparatide (parathyroid hormone) is the only anabolic agent currently approved for osteoporosis in the United States. It stimulates new bone formation, repairing architectural defects and improving bone density. All persons who have had osteoporotic vertebral or hip fractures and those with a bone mineral density diagnostic of osteoporosis should receive treatment. In those with a bone mineral density above the osteoporosis range, treatment may be indicated depending on the number and severity of other risk factors.     

Aromatase inhibitors and bone

The decrease in estrogen levels with the use of aromatase inhibitors results in an increase in the rate of bone remodelling. This result in an acceleration of bone loss, and probably to an increase in the risk of fractures. The risk of fracture is particularly high in the older woman and in the woman with a low bone mineral density. We have a number of proven treatments for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis and it is likely that some of these, particularly bisphosphonates, could be effective at preventing bone loss with aromatase inhibitors.     

Denosumab

Denosumab is an anti-receptor activator of nuclear factor (NF)-kappaB (RANK) ligand human monoclonal antibody studied as a treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO) and bone destruction due to rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or metastatic cancers. As of February 2009, the candidate was undergoing US Food and Drug Administration review, and might be approved by October 2009. Late phase clinical trials demonstrated that denosumab possesses a similar safety profile to bisphosphonates and that it can be either equally or more effective than bisphosphonates at preventing bone loss due to PMO, RA or cancer treatment and metastases.Key Words: monoclonal antibody, RANKL, bone loss, osteoporosis, breast cancer, rheumatoid arthritis     

Liver and bone

Osteoporosis is a frequent complication in patients with chronic liver disease, especially in end-stages and in cases with chronic cholestasis, hemochromatosis and alcohol abuse. The problem is more critical in transplant patients when bone loss is accelerated during the period immediately after transplantation, leading to a greater incidence of fractures. Advanced age, low body mass index and severity of the liver disease are the main risk factors for bone disease in patients with cholestasis. Mechanisms underlying osteoporosis in chronic liver disease are complex and poorly understood, but osteoporosis mainly results from low bone formation, related to the effects of retained substances of cholestasis, such as bilirubin and bile acids, or to the effects of alcohol on osteoblastic cells. Increased bone resorption has also been described in cholestatic women with advanced disease. Although there is no specific treatment, bisphosphonates associated with supplements of calcium and vitamin D are effective for increasing bone mass in patients with chronic cholestasis and after liver transplantation. The outcome in reducing the incidence of fractures has not been adequately demonstrated essentially because of the low number of patients included in the therapeutic trials. Randomized studies assessing bisphosphonates in larger series of patients, the development of new drugs for osteoporosis and the improvement in the management of liver transplant recipients may change the future.     

Treatment of Osteoporosis and Prevention of New Fractures: Role of Intravenously Administered Bisphosphonates

ObjectiveTo evaluate the usefulness of intravenously administered bisphosphonates for improving absorption, tolerability, adherence, and outcomes in the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis.MethodsData published from 1996 to 2009 relevant to the treatment of osteoporosis, with emphasis on bisphosphonates, fracture risk, adherence to therapy, frequency of dosing, intravenous treatment, tolerability, cost-effectiveness, and quality of life, were reviewed.ResultsAlthough bisphosphonates are currently the standard of care for treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis and osteoporosis in men, oral formulations are associated with poor absorption and potential irritation of the upper gastrointestinal tract. These issues necessitate complicated and restrictive dosing regimens, which in turn lead to poor compliance and persistence. Intravenous formulations such as 3 mg of ibandronate given quarterly and 5 mg of zoledronic acid administered once yearly avoid problems relating to absorption and tolerability by bypassing the gastrointestinal tract. Intravenously administered ibandronate is presumed (by virtue of similar or superior improvements in bone mineral density) to have antifracture efficacy similar to that of orally administered ibandronate given daily, which has been shown to produce significant reductions in vertebral fractures during a 3-year period in comparison with placebo. Zoledronic acid, 5 mg once yearly, has been shown to produce a significant reduction in the risk of morphometric vertebral fractures, clinical vertebral fractures, hip fractures, and nonvertebral fractures versus placebo during a 3-year interval in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis and also to yield a significantly decreased risk for new clinical fractures versus placebo in patients with recent low-trauma hip fracture. Both agents have favorable safety and tolerability profiles.ConclusionIntravenously administered bisphosphonates have the potential to increase compliance and persistence with therapy in patients with osteoporosis and to improve patient outcomes. (Endocr Pract. 2009;15:483-493)