Recognition of base J in duplex DNA by J-binding protein.

beta-d-Glucosylhydroxymethyluracil, also called base J, is an unusual modified DNA base conserved among Kinetoplastida. Base J is found predominantly in repetitive DNA and correlates with epigenetic silencing of telomeric variant surface glycoprotein genes. We have previously found a J-binding protein (JBP) in Trypanosoma, Leishmania, and Crithidia. We have now characterized the binding properties of recombinant JBP from Crithidia using synthetic J-DNA substrates that contain the glycosylated base in various DNA sequences. We find that JBP recognizes base J only when presented in double-stranded DNA but not in single-stranded DNA or in an RNA:DNA duplex. It also fails to interact with free glucose or free base J. JBP is unable to recognize nonmodified DNA or intermediates of J synthesis, suggesting that JBP is not directly involved in J biosynthesis. JBP binds J-DNA with high affinity (K(d) = 40-140 nm) but requires at least 5 bp flanking the glycosylated base for optimal binding. The nature of the flanking sequence affects binding because J in a telomeric sequence binds JBP with higher affinity than J in another sequence known to contain J in trypanosome DNA. We conclude that JBP is a structure-specific DNA-binding protein. The significance of these results in relation to the biological role and mechanism of action of J modification in kinetoplastids is discussed.     

The protein that binds to DNA base J in trypanosomatids has features of a thymidine hydroxylase

Trypanosomatids contain an unusual DNA base J (beta-d-glucosylhydroxymethyluracil), which replaces a fraction of thymine in telomeric and other DNA repeats. To determine the function of base J, we have searched for enzymes that catalyze J biosynthesis. We present evidence that a protein that binds to J in DNA, the J-binding protein 1 (JBP1), may also catalyze the first step in J biosynthesis, the conversion of thymine in DNA into hydroxymethyluracil. We show that JBP1 belongs to the family of Fe(2+) and 2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenases and that replacement of conserved residues putatively involved in Fe(2+) and 2-oxoglutarate-binding inactivates the ability of JBP1 to contribute to J synthesis without affecting its ability to bind to J-DNA. We propose that JBP1 is a thymidine hydroxylase responsible for the local amplification of J inserted by JBP2, another putative thymidine hydroxylase.     

Interaction of TFIID in the minor groove of the TATA element.

TFIID binding in the minor groove of DNA at the TATA element was demonstrated by methylation interference and hydroxyl radical footprinting assays, and by binding studies with thymine analog substituted oligonucleotides. These results provide an explanation for TFIID-dependent DNA bending at the TATA element. TFIID binding shows phosphate contacts with the same residues that were found to be essential for TFIID interactions by methylation and thymine-specific modification interference assays. Based on previous studies implicating residues conserved between the direct repeats in DNA binding, as well as models of prokaryotic DNA binding proteins, these results also suggest a model in which the direct repeats of TFIID form two basic antiparallel beta ribbon arms that could contact DNA through the minor groove.     

Sequence-specific interaction of the Salmonella Hin recombinase in both major and minor grooves of DNA.

The Hin recombinase of Salmonella catalyzes a site-specific recombination event which leads to flagellar phase variation. Starting with a fully symmetrical recombination site, hixC, a set of 40 recombination sites which vary by pairs of single base substitutions was constructed. This set was incorporated into the Salmonella-specific bacteriophage P22 based challenge phage selection and used to define the DNA sequence determinants for the binding of Hin to DNA in vivo. The critical sequence-specific contacts between a Hin monomer and a 13 bp hix half-site are at two T:A base pairs in the major groove of the DNA which are separated by one base pair, and two consecutive A:T contacts in the minor groove. The base substitutions in the major groove recognition portion which were defective in binding Hin still retained residual binding capability in vivo, while the base pair substitutions affecting the minor groove recognition region lost all in vivo binding. Using in vitro binding assays, Hin was found to bind to hix symmetrical sites with A:T base pairs or I:C base pairs in the minor groove recognition sequences, but not to G:C base pairs. In separate in vitro binding assays, Hin was equally defective in binding to either a G:C or a I:C contact in a major groove recognition sequence. Results from in vitro binding assays to hix sites in which 3-deazaadenine was substituted for adenine are consistent with Hin making a specific contact to either the N3 of adenine or O2 of thymine in the minor groove within the hix recombination site on each symmetric half-site. These results taken with the results of previous studies on the DNA binding domain of Hin suggest a sequence-specific minor groove DNA binding motif.     

Mechanism of damage recognition by Escherichia coli DNA photolyase

Escherichia coli DNA photolyase binds to DNA containing pyrimidine dimers with high affinity and then breaks the cyclobutane ring joining the two pyrimidines of the dimer in a light- (300-500 nm) dependent reaction. In order to determine the structural features important for this level of specificity, we have constructed a 43 base pair (bp) long DNA substrate that contains a thymine dimer at a unique location and studied its interaction with photolyase. We find that the enzyme protects a 12-16-bp region around the dimer from DNase I digestion and only a 6-bp region from methidium propyl-EDTA-Fe (II) digestion. Chemical footprinting experiments reveal that photolyase contacts the phosphodiester bond immediately 5' and the 3 phosphodiester bonds immediately 3' to the dimer but not the phosphodiester bond between the two thymines that make up the dimer. Methylation protection and interference experiments indicate that the enzyme makes major groove contacts with the first base 5' and the second base 3' to the dimer. These data are consistent with photolyase binding in the major groove over a 4-6-bp region. However, major groove contacts cannot be of major significance in substrate recognition as the enzyme binds equally well to a thymine dimer in a 44-base long single strand DNA and protects a 10-nucleotide long region around the dimer from DNase I digestion. It is therefore concluded that the unique configuration of the phosphodiester backbone in the strand containing the pyrimidine dimer, as well as the cyclobutane ring of the dimer itself are the important structural determinants of the substrate for recognition by photolyase.     

Binding properties and DNA sequence-specific recognition of two bithiazole-linked netropsin hybrid molecules.

We report the DNA binding properties of two hybrid molecules which result from the combination of the DNA sequence-specific minor groove ligand netropsin with the bithiazole moiety of the antitumor drug bleomycin. The drug-DNA interaction has been investigated by means of electric linear dichroism (ELD) spectroscopy and DNase I footprinting. In compound 1 the two moieties are linked by a flexible aliphatic tether while in compound 2 the two aromatic ring systems are directly coupled by a rigid peptide bond. The results are consistent with a model in which the netropsin moiety of compound 1 resides in the minor groove of DNA and where the appended bithiazole moiety is projected away from the DNA groove. This monocationic hybrid compound has a weak affinity for DNA and shows a strict preference for A and T stretches. ELD measurements indicate that in the presence of DNA compound 2 has an orientation typical of a minor groove binder. Similar orientation angles were measured for netropsin and compound 2. This ligand which has a biscationic nature tightly binds to DNA (Ka = 6.3 x 10(5) M-1) and is mainly an AT-specific groove binder. But, depending on the nature of the sequence flanking the AT site first targeted by its netropsin moiety, the bithiazole moiety of 2 can accommodate various types of nucleotide motifs with the exception of homooligomeric sequences. As evidenced by footprinting data, the bithiazole group of bleomycin acts as a DNA recognition element, offering opportunities to recognize GC bp-containing DNA sequences with apparently a preference (although not absolute) for a pyrimidine-G-pyrimidine motif. Thus, the bithiazole unit of bleomycin provides an additional anchor for DNA binding and is also capable of specifically recognizing particular DNA sequences when it is appended to a strongly sequence selective groove binding entity. Finally, a model which schematizes the binding of compound 2 to the sequence 5'-TATGC is proposed. This model readily explains the experimentally observed specificity of this netropsin-bithiazole conjugate.     

The structural basis for recognition of base J containing DNA by a novel DNA binding domain in JBP1

The J-binding protein 1 (JBP1) is essential for biosynthesis and maintenance of DNA base-J (β-d-glucosyl-hydroxymethyluracil). Base-J and JBP1 are confined to some pathogenic protozoa and are absent from higher eukaryotes, prokaryotes and viruses. We show that JBP1 recognizes J-containing DNA (J-DNA) through a 160-residue domain, DB-JBP1, with 10 000-fold preference over normal DNA. The crystal structure of DB-JBP1 revealed a helix-turn-helix variant fold, a ‘helical bouquet’ with a ‘ribbon’ helix encompassing the amino acids responsible for DNA binding. Mutation of a single residue (Asp525) in the ribbon helix abrogates specificity toward J-DNA. The same mutation renders JBP1 unable to rescue the targeted deletion of endogenous JBP1 genes in Leishmania and changes its distribution in the nucleus. Based on mutational analysis and hydrogen/deuterium-exchange mass-spectrometry data, a model of JBP1 bound to J-DNA was constructed and validated by small-angle X-ray scattering data. Our results open new possibilities for targeted prevention of J-DNA recognition as a therapeutic intervention for parasitic diseases.     

J-binding protein increases the level and retention of the unusual base J in trypanosome DNA

The nuclear DNA of Trypanosoma brucei and other kinetoplastid flagellates contains the unusual base beta-d-glucosyl-hydroxymethyluracil, called J, replacing part of the thymine in repetitive sequences. We have described a 100 kDa protein that specifically binds to J in duplex DNA. We have now disrupted the genes for this J-binding protein (JBP) in T. brucei. The disruption does not affect growth, gene expression or the stability of some repetitive DNA sequences. Unexpectedly, however, the JBP KO trypanosomes contain only about 5% of the wild-type level of J in their DNA. Excess J, randomly introduced into T. brucei DNA by growing the cells in the presence of the J precursor 5-hydroxymethyldeoxyuridine, is lost by simple dilution as the KO trypanosomes multiply, showing that JBP does not protect J against removal. In contrast, cells containing JBP lose excess J only sluggishly. We conclude that JBP is able to activate the thymine modification enzymes to introduce additional J in regions of DNA already containing a basal level of J. We propose that JBP is a novel DNA modification maintenance protein.     

Structure of homeodomain-leucine zipper/DNA complexes studied using hydroxyl radical cleavage of DNA and methylation interference

Homeodomain-leucine zipper (HD-Zip) proteins, unlike most homeodomain proteins, bind a pseudopalindromic DNA sequence as dimers. We have investigated the structure of the DNA complexes formed by two HD-Zip proteins with different nucleotide preferences at the central position of the binding site using footprinting and interference methods. The results indicate that the respective complexes are not symmetric, with the strand bearing a central purine (top strand) showing higher protection around the central region and the bottom strand protected toward the 3' end. Binding to a sequence with a nonpreferred central base pair produces a decrease in protection in either the top or the bottom strand, depending upon the protein. Modeling studies derived from the complex formed by the monomeric Antennapedia homeodomain with DNA indicate that in the HD-Zip/DNA complex the recognition helix of one of the monomers is displaced within the major groove respective to the other one. This monomer seems to lose contacts with a part of the recognition sequence upon binding to the nonpreferred site. The results show that the structure of the complex formed by HD-Zip proteins with DNA is dependent upon both protein intrinsic characteristics and the nucleotides present at the central position of the recognition sequence.     

KpnI restriction endonuclease and methyltransferase exhibit contrasting mode of sequence recognition

The molecular basis of the interaction of KpnI restriction endonuclease (REase) and the corresponding methyltransferase (MTase) at their cognate recognition sequence is investigated using a range of footprinting techniques. DNase I protection analysis with the REase reveals the protection of a 14–18 bp region encompassing the hexanucleotide recognition sequence. The MTase, in contrast, protects a larger region. KpnI REase contacts two adjacent guanine residues and the single adenine residue in both the strands within the recognition sequence 5′-GGTACC-3′, inferred by dimethylsulfate (DMS) protection, interference and missing nucleotide interference analysis. In contrast, KpnI MTase does not show elaborate base-specific contacts. Ethylation interference analysis also showed the differential interaction of REase and MTase with phosphate groups of three adjacent bases on both strands within the recognition sequence. The single thymine residue within the sequence is hyper- reactive to the permanganate oxidation, consistent with MTase-induced base flipping. The REase on the other hand does not show any major DNA distortion. The results demonstrate that the differences in the molecular interaction pattern of the two proteins at the same recognition sequence reflect the contrasting chemistry of DNA cleavage and methylation catalyzed by these two dissimilar enzymes, working in combination as constituents of a cellular defense strategy.     

Interchange of DNA-binding modes in the deformed and ultrabithorax homeodomains: a structural role for the N-terminal arm

The deformed (Dfd) and ultrabithorax (Ubx) homeoproteins regulate developmental gene expression in Drosophila melanogaster by binding to specific DNA sequences within its genome. DNA binding is largely accomplished via a highly conserved helix-turn-helix DNA-binding domain that is known as a homeodomain (HD). Despite nearly identical DNA recognition helices and similar target DNA sequence preferences, the in vivo functions of the two proteins are quite different. We have previously revealed differences between the two HDs in their interactions with DNA. In an effort to define the individual roles of the HD N-terminal arm and recognition helix in sequence-specific binding, we have characterized the structural details of two Dfd/Ubx chimeric HDs in complex with both the Dfd and Ubx-optimal-binding site sequences. We utilized hydroxyl radical cleavage of DNA to assess the positioning of the proteins on the binding sites. The effects of missing nucleosides and purine methylation on HD binding were also analyzed. Our results show that both the Dfd and Ubx HDs have similar DNA-binding modes when in complex with the Ubx-optimal site. There are subtle but reproducible differences in these modes that are completely interchanged when the Dfd N-terminal arm is replaced with the corresponding region of the Ubx HD. In contrast, we showed previously that the Dfd-optimal site sequence elicits a very different binding mode for the Ubx HD, while the Dfd HD maintains a mode similar to that elicited by the Ubx-optimal site. Our current methylation interference studies suggest that this alternate binding mode involves interaction of the Ubx N-terminal arm with the minor groove on the opposite face of DNA relative to the major groove that is occupied by the recognition helix. As judged by hydroxyl radical footprinting and the missing nucleoside experiment, it appears that interaction of the Ubx recognition helix with the DNA major groove is reduced. Replacing the Dfd N-terminal arm with that of Ubx does not elicit a complete interchange of the DNA-binding mode. Although the position of the chimera relative to DNA, as judged by hydroxyl radical footprinting, is similar to that of the Dfd HD, the missing nucleoside and methylation interference patterns resemble those of the Ubx HD. Repositioning of amino acid side-chains without wholesale structural alteration in the polypeptide appears to occur as a function of N-terminal arm identity and DNA-binding site sequence. Complete interchange of binding modes was achieved only by replacement of the Dfd N-terminal arm and the recognition helix plus 13 carboxyl-terminal residues with the corresponding residues of Ubx. The position of the N-terminal arm in the DNA minor groove appears to differ in a manner that depends on the two base-pair differences between the Dfd and Ubx-optimal-binding sites. Thus, N-terminal arm position dictates the binding mode and the interaction of the recognition helix with nucleosides in the major groove.     

Use of monoacetyl-4-hydroxyaminoquinoline 1-oxide to probe contacts between guanines and protein in the minor and major grooves of DNA. Interaction of Escherichia coli integration host factor with its recognition site in the early promoter and transposition enhancer of bacteriophage Mu.

Monoacetyl-4-hydroxyaminoquinoline 1-oxide (Ac-HAQO) reacts with DNA to form adducts at the C8- and N2-positions of guanine and with the N6-position of adenine. Only the N2-guanine adduct blocks the 3'-5' exonuclease action of phage T4 DNA polymerase. Piperidine treatment cleaves the DNA at sites bearing C8-guanine adducts. The N2-position of guanine lies in the minor groove of DNA, whereas the C8-position of guanine occupies the major groove. We have taken advantage of these characteristics to employ Ac-HAQO in conjunction with either T4 DNA polymerase or piperidine in a footprinting technique to probe the interaction of the Escherichia coli integration host factor (IHF) with its binding site. We show that when IHF binds to its recognition site both the N2- and C8-positions of guanines are protected from modification by AcHAQO. In addition, the binding of IHF to DNA was prevented when either an N2- or a C8-AQO adduct was present in the binding site. When dimethylsulfate was used as the footprinting reagent, IHF protected against methylation of the N3 position of adenine in the minor groove but not the N7 position of guanine in the major groove. The difference in results obtained with the two reagents is ascribed to their relative sizes. Both DMS and AcHAQO are excluded by IHF from the minor groove, but only the larger AcHAQO molecule is excluded from the major groove.     

Selective binding to AT sequences in DNA by an acridine-linked peptide containing the SPKK motif.

The sequence selectivity of binding to DNA by an acridine-linked peptide ligand has been investigated by means of footprinting methodologies. The ligand conjugates an anilino-acridine intercalating chromophore with the potentially minor groove binder octapeptide SPKKSPKK. This basic peptide corresponds to a highly conserved DNA recognition motif found in histone H1 and several other nonhistone proteins. Three complementary techniques using DNase I, hydroxyl radicals and osmium tetroxide as sequencing probes have been employed to evaluate both the sequence specificity of binding and the drug-induced conformational changes in DNA. The results converge to demonstrate the AT-selectivity and support a model in which the peptide moiety lies in the minor groove. DNA-binding sites of the conjugate are restricted to a few alternating AT-sequences proximal to GC-rich regions. Binding to homooligomeric runs of A and T is clearly disfavoured by the hybrid whereas such sequences represent preferred binding sites for the unsubstituted basic peptide. These differences reflect the influence of the anilino-acridine chromophore, which evidently contributes to the DNA recognition process allowing the peptide only to contact defined DNA sequences.     

Molecular recognition of B-DNA by Hoechst 33258.

The binding sites of Hoechst 33258, netropsin and distamycin on three DNA restriction fragments from plasmid pBR322 were compared by footprinting with methidiumpropyl-EDTA X Fe(II) [MPE X Fe(II)]. Hoechst, netropsin and distamycin share common binding sites that are five +/- one bp in size and rich in A X T DNA base pairs. The five base pair protection patterns for Hoechst may result from a central three base pair recognition site bound by two bisbenzimidazole NHs forming a bridge on the floor of the minor groove between adjacent adenine N3 and thymine O2 atoms on opposite helix strands. Hydrophobic interaction of the flanking phenol and N-methylpiperazine rings would afford a steric blockade of one additional base pair on each side.