D-xylose fermentation by Candida shehatae and pichia stipitis at low dissolved oxygen levels in fed-batch cultures

Summary The fermentation of D-xylose byCandida shehatae andPichia stipitis was studied in fed-batch fermentations using dissolved oxygen tension (DOT) control in the range of 0.2 to 1.4% air saturation. The response of these two yeasts to DOT was significantly different. Whereas the ethanol yield withC. shehatae was 0.35 to 0.38 g.g^–1 at all DOT levels, that ofP. stipitis decreased from 0.44 at a zero DOT reading to 0.19 g.g^–1 at 1.4% DOT.     

Xylose fermentation by Candida shehatae and Pichia stipitis: effects of pH,temperature and substrate concentration

The effects of temperature, pH and xylose concentration on the fermentation parameters of Candida shehatae and Pichia stipitis were evaluated. The optimum pH was in the region of pH 4–5.5, with an optimum fermentation temperature of 30°C. Maximum fermentation rates were reached at 50 g l⁻¹ xylose. A maximum volumetric ethanol productivity of about 0.9 g (l h)⁻¹ was obtained with both yeast strains. The ethanol yield of C. shehatae decreased considerably when cultivated above 30°C or when the xylose concentration was increased. Xylitol accumulated concomitantly. Xylitol production by P. stipitis was observed only during cultivation at 36°C. Whereas the ethanol yield of C. shehatae was usually about 75% of the theoretical maximum, it was 85–90% with P. stipitis.     

Effect of aerobiosis on fermentation and key enzyme levels during growth of Pichia stipitis,Candida shehatae and Candida tenuis on d-xylose

The relationship between the degree of aerobiosis, xylitol production and the initial two key enzymes of d-xylose metabolism were investigated in the yeasts Pichia stipitis, Candida shehatae and C. tenuis. Anoxic conditions severely curtailed growth and retarded ethanol productivity. This, together with the inverse relationship between xylitol accumulation and aeration level, suggested a degree of redox imbalance. The ratios of NADH- to NADPH-linked xylose reductase were similar in all three yeasts and essentially independent of the degree of aerobiosis, and thus did not correlate with their differing capacities for ethanol production, xylitol accumulation or growth under the different conditions of aerobiosis. Under anoxic conditions the enzyme activity of Pichia stipitis decreased significantly, which possibly contributed to its weaker anoxic fermentation of xylose compared to C. shehatae.     

Combined alcoholic fermentation of D-xylose and D-glucose by four selected microbial strains: Process considerations in relation to ethanol tolerance

Summary As components of combined fermentation of both glucose and xylose to ethanol by separated or coculture processes, the effects of initial sugar concentrations on the fermentative performances ofPichia stipitis Y7124,Candida shehatae ATCC 22984,Saccharomyces cerevisiae CBS1200 andZymomonas mobilis ATCC10988 were investigated. From the characteristics of sugar and produced ethanol tolerances the most suitable microorganisms for the achievement of glucose and xylose fermentations have been selected with respect to different fermentation schemes.Nomenclature Tf fermentation time (hours) - Ef ethanol concentration (g/l) - Y_P/S ethanol yield (g of ethanol produced/g of sugar used) - qp average specific productivity of ethanol (g ethanol/g of cells per hour) - max maximum specific growth rate (h^–1)     

The effect of aeration on D-xylose fermentation byPachysolen tannophilus,Pichia stipitis,Kluyveromyces marxianus andCandida shehatae

Summary The fermentation of D-xylose byPachysolen tannophilus Y2460,Pichia stipitis Y7124,Kluyveromyces marxianus Y2415 andCandida shehatae Y12878 was investigated in aerobic, anaerobic and microaerophilic batch cultures. The aeration rate greatly influenced the fermentations; growth, rate of ethanol production and oxidation of ethanol are affected. Of the strains tested,Pichia stipitis appears superior; under anaerobic conditions it converts D-xylose (20 g/l) to ethanol with a yield of 0.40 g/l and it exhibits the highest ethanol specific productivity (3.5 g of ethanol per g dry cell per day) under microaerophilic conditions.     

The fermentation of hexose and pentose sugars by Candida shehatae and Pichia stipitis

Summary The fermentation by Candida shehatae and Pichia stipitis of xylitol and the various sugars which are liberated upon hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass was investigated. Both yeasts produced ethanol from d-glucose, d-mannose, d-galactose and d-xylose. Only P. stipitis fermented d-cellobiose, producing 6.5 g·l^-1 ethanol from 20 g·l^-1 cellobiose within 48 h. No ethanol was produced from l-arabinose, l-rhamnose or xylitol. Diauxie was evident during the fermentation of a sugar mixture. Following the depletion of glucose, P. stipitis fermented galactose, mannose, xylose and cellobiose simultaneously with no noticeable preceding lag period. A similar fermentation pattern was observed with C. shehatae, except that it failed to utilize cellobiose even though it grew on cellobiose when supplied as the sole sugar. P. stipitis produced considerably more ethanol from the sugar mixture than C. shehatae, primarily due to its ability to ferment cellobiose. In general P. stipitis exhibited a higher volumetric rate and yield of ethanol production. This yeast fermented glucose 30–50% more rapidly than xylose, whereas the rates of ethanol production from these two sugars by C. shehatae were similar. P. stipitis had no absolute vitamin requirement for xylose fermentation, but biotin and thiamine enhanced the rate and yield of ethanol production significantly.Nomenclature _max Maximum specific growth rate, h^-1 - Q _p Maximum volumetric rate of ethanol production, calculated from the slope of the ethanol vs. time curve, g·(l·h)^-1 - q _p Maximum specific rate of ethanol production, g·(g cells·h) - Y _p/s Ethanol yield coefficient, g ethanol·(g substrate utilized)^-1 - Y _x/s Cell yield coefficient, g biomass·(g substrate utilized)^-1 - E Efficiency of substrate utilization, g substrate consumed·(g initial substrate)^-1·100     

Ethanol tolerance of Pichia stipitis and Candida shehatae strains in fed-batch cultures at controlled low dissolved oxygen levels

Summary Fed-batch cultivations of Pichia stipitis and strains of Candida shehatae with d-xylose or d-glucose were conducted at controlled low dissolved oxygen tension (DOT) levels. There were some marked differences between the strains. In general growth was inhibited at lower ethanol concentrations than fermentation, and ethanol levels of up to 47 g·l^-1 were produced at 30°C. Ethanol production was mainly growth associated. The yeast strains formed small amounts of monocarboxylic acids and higher alcohols, which apparently did not enhance the ethanol toxicity. The maximum ethanol concentration obtained on d-xylose could not be increased by using a high cell density culture, nor by using d-glucose as substrate. The latter observation suggested that the low ethanol tolerance of these xylose-fermenting yeast strains was not a consequence of the metabolic pathway used during pentose fermentation. In contrast with the C. shehatae strains, it was apparent with P. stipitis CSIR-Y633 that when the ethanol concentration reached about 28 g·l^-1, ethanol assimilation exceeded ethanol production, despite cultivation at a low DOT of 0.2% of air saturation. Discontinuing the aeration enabled ethanol accumulation to proceed, but with concomitant xylitol production and cessation of growth.     

Co-expression of xylose reductase gene from <Emphasis Type="Italic">Candida shehatae</Emphasis> and endogenous xylitol dehydrogenase gene in <Emphasis Type="Italic">Saccharomyces cerevisiae</Emphasis> and the effect of metabolizing xylose to ethanol

The inability oft Saccharomyces cerevisiae to utilize xylose is attributed to its inability to convert xylose to xylulose. Low xylose reductase (XR) and xylitol dehydrogenase (XDH) activities in S. cerevisiae are regarded as the reason of blocking the pathway from xylose to xylulose. We had found that Candida shehatae could also be another source for XR gene except Pichia stipitis in the previous study. In this study, we tried to investigate if the expressed XR from C. shehatae could work with the over-expressed endogenous XDH together to achieve the same goal of converting xylose to ethanol in S. cerevisiae. The XR gene (XYL1) from C. shehatae and endogenous XDH gene (XYL2) were both cloned and over-expressed in host S. cerevisiae cell. The specific enzyme activities of XR and XDH were measured and the result of fermentation revealed that the new combination of two enzymes from different sources other than P. stipitis could also coordinate and work with each other and confer xylose utilization ability to S. cerevisiae.     

Candida shehatae — Genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships with other xylose-fermenting yeasts

The xylose-fermenting yeasts Candida shehatae and Pichia stipitis were compared from extent of nuclear DNA complementarity and ribosomal RNA sequence similarity. Low levels of DNA relatedness confirmed that the two taxa are distinct biological species, but the similarity of rRNA sequences suggests that they only recently diverged. C. shehatae is comprised of three genetically divergent (ca. 50% DNA relatedness) subgroups that were accorded varietal status: C. shehatae var. shehatae, var. Lignosa and var. insectosa. Estimates of phylogenetic distance from rRNA sequence similarity show C. shehatae and P. stipitis to be more closely related to Pachysolen tannophilus than to Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and that all of these budding yeasts are well separated from Schizosaccharomyces pombe.     

A quantitative screening of some xylose-fermenting yeast isolates

Summary A quantitative screening procedure for xylose fermentation was conducted on 56 yeast isolates. Several of the isolates were found to be markedly superior toC. shehatae CSIR-Y492, one of the better xylose-fermenting yeasts identified thus far. The outstanding isolate was a strain ofPichia stipitis which had an ethanol yield coefficient of 0.45 from xylose and which produced no detectable amounts of xylitol.     

Xylulose fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae and xylose-fermenting yeast strains

Xylulose fermentation by four strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and two strains of xylose-fermenting yeasts, Pichia stipitis CBS 6054 and Candida shehatae NJ 23, was compared using a mineral medium at a cell concentration of 10 g (dry weight)/l. When xylulose was the sole carbon source and fermentation was anaerobic, S. cerevisiae ATCC 24860 and CBS 8066 showed a substrate consumption rate of 0.035 g g cells^–1 h^–1 compared with 0.833 g g cells^–1 h^–1 for glucose. Bakers' yeast and S. cerevisiae isolate 3 consumed xylulose at a much lower rate although they fermented glucose as rapidly as the ATCC and the CBS strains. While P. stipitis CBS 6054 consumed both xylulose and glucose very slowly under anaerobic conditions, C. shehatae NJ 23 fermented xylulose at a rate of 0.345 g g cells^–1 h^–1, compared with 0.575 g g cells^–1 h^–1 for glucose. For all six strains, the addition of glucose to the xylulose medium did not enhance the consumption of xylulose, but increased the cell biomass concentrations. When fermentation was performed under oxygen-limited conditions, less xylulose was consumed by S. cerevisiae ATCC 24860 and C. shehatae NJ 23, and 50%–65% of the assimilated carbon could not be accounted for in the products determined.     

Xylitol production by recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae expressing the Pichia stipitis and Candida shehatae XYL1 genes

The xylose reductase gene (XYL1) was isolated from Pichia stipitis and Candida shehatae, cloned into YEp-based vectors under the control of ADH2 and PGK1 promoter/terminator cassettes and introduced into Saccharomyces cerevisiae Y294 by electroporation. Shake-flask fermentations were carried out with 5% xylose and 1% galactose, glucose or maltose as co-substrates. Xylose uptake was similar in both the recombinant strains when different co-substrates were used and slowed once the co-substrate was depleted. The recombinant strains converted xylose to xylitol with yields approaching the theoretical maxima. Xylitol production was most rapid when the co-substrate was still present. Approximately 50% of the xylose was not metabolized due to the depletion of the co-substrate. Received: 23 December 1999 / Received revision: 30 June 2000 / Accepted: 1 July 2000     

Oxygen starvation induces cell death in Candida shehatae fermentations of d-xylose, but not d-glucose

Candida shehatae cells, cultivated on d-glucose and d-xylose, were subjected to a shift from fully aerobic to anaerobic fermentative conditions. After anaerobic conditions were imposed, growth was limited to approximately one doubling or less as C. shehatae rapidly entered a stationary phase of growth. Following the shift to anoxia, cell viability rapidly declined and the total cell volume declined in the d-xylose fermentations. Moreover, the cell volume distribution shifted to smaller volumes. Cell viability, measured by plate counts, declined nine times faster for d-xylose fermentations than for d-glucose fermentations. Anaerobic growth did not occur on either d-glucose or d-xylose. Selected vitamins and amino acids did not stimulate anaerobic growth in C. shehatae, but did enhance anaerobic growth on d-glucose in S. cerevisiae. The decline in cell viability and lack of anaerobic growth by C. shehatae were attributed to oxygen deficiency and not to ethanol inhibition. The results shed light on why C. shehatae anaerobic fermentations are not currently practical and suggest that research directed towards a biochemical understanding of why C. shehatae can not grow anaerobically will yield significant improvements in ethanol fermentations from d-xylose. Received 26 October 1998 / Received revision: 26 January 1999 / Accepted: 12 February 1999     

Fermentation of hardwood hemicellulose hydrolysate byPachysolen tannophilus,candida shehatae andPichia stipitis

Summary Hardwood hemicellulose hydrolysate has been utilized as a substrate for ethanol production. Among the three different yeasts tested, the best performances have been obtained, in decreasing order, usingPachysolen tannophilus, Candida shehatae andPichia stipitis. Several pretreatments of this raw material have been studied to improve ethanol yields; in one such pretreatment a strain ofP. tannophilus produced ethanol with a yield of 0.29 g_ethanol/g_sugars (g_P/g_S); which is only 15% less than the values observed with synthetic media. Neither aeration nor acetone addition improved the fermentation of this substrate; in fact, only a marked stimulation of biomass growth has been observed at the expense of both ethanol and xylitol production.     

Fermentation of cellobiose and wood sugars to ethanol byCandida shehatae andPichia stipitis

Summary Three pentose fermenting yeast strains ofCandida shehatae and three ofPichia stipitis were examined for their ability to produce ethanol from cellobiose and from sugars liberated by hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass. All of thePichia strains tested produced some ethanol;P. stipitis CBS 5776 gave the highest yield: 10.3 g/L on complete fermentation of 25 g/L cellobiose within 48 hours. This yeast also produced considerably more ethanol from the wood sugar mixture.     

Increase in ploidy in yeasts as a response to stressing media

Summary A recently developed technique for determining the ploidy of fungal cells has been used to examine the relative ploidy levels of culture collection strains of two xylose-fermenting yeasts Candida shehatae and Pichia stipitis and their respective R strains. The R strains have been shown to have increased ploidy by at least a factor of two during their recycling in stressing media, namely wood hydrolysates. Their improved efficiency in xylose fermentation may be attributed at least in part to their increased ploidy.Offprint requests to: N. J. Talbot     

Transport of xylose and glucose in the xylose-fermenting yeast Pichia stipitis

Summary A low-affinity and a high-affinity sylose proton symport operated simultaneously in both starved and non-starved cells of Pichia stipitis. Glucose competed with xylose for transport by the low-affinity system and inhibited xylose transport by the high-affinity system non-competitively. The low affinity system was subject to substrate inhibition when glucose but not when xylose was the substrate. The differences between the characteristics of monosaccharide transport by Pichia stipitis and its imperfect state, Candida shehatae, are discussed.     

The effect of aeration on xylose fermentation by Candida shehatae and Pachysolen tannophilus

Summary The ability of a Candida shehatae and a Pachysolen tannophilus strain to ferment D-xylose to ethanol was evaluated in defined and complex media under different levels of aeration. Aeration enhanced the ethanol productivity of both yeasts considerably. C. shehatae maintained a higher fermentation rate and ethanol yield than P. tannophilus over a wide range of aeration levels. Ethanol production by C. shehatae commenced during the early stage of the fermentation, whereas with P. tannophilus there was a considerable lag between the initiation of growth and ethanol production. Both yeasts produced appreciable quantities of xylitol late in the fermentation. P. tannophilus failed to grow under anoxic conditions, producing a maximum of only 0.5 g · l^-1 ethanol. In comparison, C. shehatae exhibited limited growth in anoxic cultures, and produced ethanol much more rapidly. Under the condition of aeration where C. shehatae exhibited the highest ethanol productivity, the fermentation parameters were: maximum specific growth rate, 0.15 h^-1; maximum volumetric and specific rates of ethanol production, 0.7 g (l · h)^-1 and 0.34 g ethanol (g cells · h)^-1 respectively; ethanol yield, 0.36 g (g xylose)^-1. The best values obtained with P. tannophilus were: maximum specific growth rate, 0.14 h^-1; maximum volumetric and specific rates of ethanol production, 0.22 g (l · h)^-1 and 0.07 h^-1 respectively; ethanol yield coefficient, 0.28. Because of its higher ethanol productivity at various levels of aeration, C. shehatae has a greater potential for ethanol production from xylose than P. tannophilus.     

Temperature profiles of growth and ethanol tolerance of the xylose-fermenting yeasts Candida shehatae and Pichia stipitis

Summary The effect of different ethanol concentrations on the growth of Candida shehatae and Pichia stipitis with xylose as substrate was evaluated in a temperature gradient incubator. The upper limit of the temperature profiles of ethanol tolerance of both yeast strains were similar, although P. stipitis appeared to have a slightly higher ethanol tolerance in the higher temperature range. An increase in the ethanol concentration severely depressed the maximum growth temperature, and also increased the minimum growth temperature slightly. The ethanol tolerance limit of 46–48 g·l^-1 occurred within a narrow temperature plateau of 11 to 22° C. The low ethanol tolerance of these pentose fermenting yeasts is detrimental for commercial ethanol production from hemicellulose hydrolysates.     

Comparative evaluation of ethanol production by xylose-fermenting yeasts presented high xylose concentrations

Summary Three strains ofPichia stipitis and three ofCandida shehatae were compared withPachysolen tannophilus in their abilities to ferment xylose at concentrations as high as 200 g/L when subjected to both aerobic and microaerophilic conditions. Evaluations based on accumulated ethanol concentrations, ethanol productivities, xylose consumption, and ethanol and xylitol yields were determined from batch culture time courses. Of the strains considered,P.stipitis NRRL Y-7124 seemed most promising since it was able to utilize all but 7 g/L of 150 g/L xylose supplied aerobically to produce 52 g/L ethanol at a yield of 0.39 g per gram xylose (76% of theoretical yield) and at a rate comparable to the fastest shown byC.shehatae NRRL Y-12878. For all strains tested, fermentation results from aerobic cultures were more favorable than those from microaerophilic cultures.The mention of firm names or trade products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the U.S. Department of Agriculture over other firms or similar products not mentioned.