Disruption of the mu-delta opioid receptor heteromer

The crystal structure of the mu and kappa opioid receptors has revealed dimeric structural arrangements. Mu-delta receptors heteromers also exist and we have identified discrete cytoplasmic regions in each receptor required for oligomer formation. In the carboxyl tail of the delta receptor we identified three glycine residues (-GGG), substitution of any of these residues prevented heteromer formation. In intracellular loop 3 of both mu and delta receptors we identified three residues (-SVR), substitution of any of these residues prevented heteromer formation.     

Trafficking of preassembled opioid mu-delta heterooligomer-Gz signaling complexes to the plasma membrane: coregulation by agonists

The cellular site of formation, Galpha-coupling preference, and agonist regulation of mu-delta opioid receptor (OR) heterooligomers were studied. Bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) showed that mu-deltaOR heterooligomers, composed of preformed mu and delta homooligomers, interacted constitutively in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) with Galpha-proteins forming heteromeric signaling complexes before being targeted to the plasma membrane. Compared to muOR homooligomers, the mu-delta heterooligomers showed higher affinity and efficiency of interaction for Gz over Gi, indicating a switch in G-protein preference. Treatment with DAMGO or deltorphin II led to coregulated internalization of both receptors, whereas DPDPE and DSLET had no effect on mu-delta internalization. Staggered expression resulted in non-interacting mu and delta receptors, even though both receptors were colocalized at the cell surface. Agonists failed to induce BRET between staggered receptors, and resulted in internalization solely of the receptor targeted by agonist. Thus, mu-deltaOR heterooligomers form and preferentially associate with Gz to generate a signaling complex in the ER, and have a distinct agonist-internalization profile compared to either mu or delta homooligomers.     

Evidence for a mu-delta opioid receptor complex in CHO cells co-expressing mu and delta opioid peptide receptors

Based on non-competitive binding interactions we suggested that mu and delta receptors associate as a mu/delta receptor complex in rat brain. We hypothesized that the same non-competitive binding interactions observed in rat brain will be seen in CHO cells that co-express mu and delta receptors, but not in cells that express just mu or delta receptors. We used CHO cells expressing the cloned human mu receptor, cloned human delta receptor, or cloned mouse delta/human mu ("dimer cell"). Cell membranes were prepared from intact cells pretreated with 100nM SUPERFIT. [(3)H][d-Ala(2),d-Leu(5)]enkephalin binding assays followed published procedures. SUPERFIT, a delta-selective irreversible ligand, decreased [(3)H][d-Ala(2),d-Leu(5)]enkephalin binding to delta receptors by approximately 75% and to mu receptors by approximately 50% in dimer cells. SUPERFIT treatment did not decrease [(3)H][d-Ala(2),d-Leu(5)]enkephalin binding to mu cells. The IC(50) values observed in SUPERFIT-treated dimer cells were: [d-Pen(2),d-Pen(5)]enkephalin (1820nM) and morphine (171nM). Saturation binding experiments with SUPERFIT-treated dimer cells showed that [d-Pen(2),d-Pen(5)]enkephalin (5000nM) was a competitive inhibitor. In contrast, morphine (1000nM) lowered the B(max) from 1944fmol/mg to 1276fmol/mg protein (35% decrease). Both [d-Pen(2),d-Pen(5)]enkephalin and morphine competitively inhibited [(3)H][d-Ala(2),d-Leu(5)]enkephalin binding to SUPERFIT-treated mu cells. The results indicate that the mu-delta opioid receptor complex defined on the basis of non-competitive binding interactions in rat brain over 20 years ago likely occurs as a consequence of the formation of mu-delta heterodimers. SUPERFIT-treated dimer cells may provide a useful model to study the properties of mu-delta heterodimers.     

A conserved arginine in the distal third intracellular loop of the mu-opioid receptor is required for G protein activation

In the present study, the functional significance of the intracellular C-terminal loop of the mu-opioid receptor in activating Gi proteins was determined by constructing a C-terminal deletion mutant mu(C delta 45) receptor, which lacks the carboxyl 45 amino acids. When the truncated mu(C delta 45) receptor was stably expressed in human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells, the efficacy and the potency of [D-Ala2,N-Me-Phe4,Gly-ol5]enkephalin (DAMGO), a specific mu-opioid receptor agonist, to inhibit forskolin-stimulated adenylate cyclase activity were not significantly affected. Similar to other G-coupled receptors, the third cytoplasmic loop of the mu-opioid receptor contains conserved basic residues (R276/R277/R280) at the C-terminal segment. Mutating these basic residues to neutral amino acids (L276/M277/L280) greatly impaired the ability of DAMGO to inhibit forskolin-stimulated cyclic AMP formation. Replacing R276/R277 with L276/M277 did not affect the efficacy and potency by which DAMGO inhibits the adenylate cyclase activity. In HEK 293 cells stably expressing mutant (R280L) mu-opioid receptors, the ability of DAMGO to inhibit forskolin-stimulated cyclic AMP production was greatly reduced. These results suggest that the intracellular carboxyl tail of the mu-opioid receptor does not play a significant role in activating Gi proteins and that the arginine residue (R280) at the distal third cytoplasmic loop is required for Gi activation by the mu-opioid receptor.     

Two amino acids in each of D1 and D2 dopamine receptor cytoplasmic regions are involved in D1-D2 heteromer formation

D(1) and D(2) dopamine receptors exist as heteromers in cells and brain tissue and are dynamically regulated and separated by agonist concentrations at the cell surface. We determined that these receptor pairs interact primarily through discrete amino acids in the cytoplasmic regions of each receptor, with no evidence of any D(1)-D(2) receptor transmembrane interaction found. Specifically involved in heteromer formation we identified, in intracellular loop 3 of the D(2) receptor, two adjacent arginine residues. Substitution of one of the arginine pair prevented heteromer formation. Also involved in heteromer formation we identified, in the carboxyl tail of the D(1) receptor, two adjacent glutamic acid residues. Substitution of one of the glutamic acid pair prevented heteromer formation. These amino acid pairs in D(1) and D(2) receptors are oppositely charged, and presumably interact directly by electrostatic interactions.     

Design, synthesis, and evaluation of a novel series of alpha-substituted phenylpropanoic acid derivatives as human peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) alpha/delta dual agonists for the treatment of metabolic syndrome

A series of alpha-alkyl-substituted phenylpropanoic acids was prepared as dual agonists of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors alpha and delta (PPARalpha/delta). Structure-activity relationship studies indicated that the shape of the linking group and the shape of the substituent at the distal benzene ring play key roles in determining the potency and the selectivity of PPAR subtype transactivation. Structure-activity relationships among the amide series (10) and the reversed amide series (13) are similar, but not identical, especially in the case of the compounds bearing a bulky hydrophobic substituent at the distal benzene ring, indicating that the hydrophobic tail part of the molecules in these two series binds at somewhat different positions in the large binding pocket of PPAR. alpha-Alkyl-substituted phenylpropanoic acids of (S)-configuration were identified as potent human PPARalpha/delta dual agonists. Representative compounds exhibited marked nuclear receptor selectivity for PPARalpha and PPARdelta. Subtype-selective PPAR activation was also examined by analysis of the mRNA expression of PPAR-regulated genes.     

Galpha protein selectivity determinant specified by a viral chemokine receptor-conserved region in the C tail of the human herpesvirus 8 g protein-coupled receptor

The viral G-protein coupled receptor (vGPCR) specified by human herpesvirus 8 (HHV-8) open reading frame 74 (ORF74) is a ligand-independent chemokine receptor that has structural and functional homologues among other characterized gammaherpesviruses and related receptors in the betaherpesviruses. Sequence comparisons of the gammaherpesvirus vGPCRs revealed a highly conserved region in the C tail, just distal to the seventh transmembrane domain. Mutagenesis of the corresponding codons of HHV-8 ORF74 was carried out to provide C-tail-altered proteins for functional analyses. By measuring receptor-activated vascular endothelial growth factor promoter induction and NF-kappaB, mitogen-activated protein kinase, and Ca(2+) signaling, we found that while some altered receptors showed general signaling deficiencies, others had distinguishable activation profiles, suggestive of selective Galpha protein coupling. This was supported by the finding that vGPCR and representative functionally altered variants, vGPCR.8 (R322W) and vGPCR.15 (M325S), were affected differently by inhibitors of Galpha(i) (pertussis toxin), protein kinase C (GF109203X), and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (wortmannin). Consistent with the signaling data, [(35)S]GTPgammaS incorporation assays revealed preferential coupling of vGPCR.15 to Galpha(q) and an inability of vGPCR.8 to couple functionally to Galpha(q). However, both variants, wild-type vGPCR, and a C-tail deletion version of the receptor were equally able to associate physically with Galpha(q). Combined, our data demonstrate that HHV-8 vGPCR contains discrete sites of Galpha interaction and that receptor residues in the proximal region of the cytoplasmic tail are determinants of Galpha protein coupling specificity.     

Molecular determinants for the differential coupling of Galpha(16) to the melatonin MT1, MT2 and Xenopus Mel1c receptors

The pineal neurohormone melatonin modulates a variety of physiological processes through different receptors. It has recently been reported that the cloned melatonin receptors (MT1, MT2 and Mel1c) exhibit differential abilities to stimulate phospholipase C (PLC) via G(16). Here we examined the molecular basis of such differences in melatonin receptor signaling. Coexpression of MT1 or MT2 with the alpha subunit of G(16) (Galpha(16) ) allowed COS-7 cells to accumulate inositol phosphates in response to 2-iodomelatonin. In contrast, Mel1c did not activate Galpha(16) even though its expression was demonstrated by radioligand binding and agonist-induced inhibition of adenylyl cyclase. As Mel1c possesses an exceptionally large C-terminal tail, we further asked if this structural feature prevented productive coupling to Galpha(16). Eleven chimeric melatonin or mutant receptors were constructed by swapping all or part of the C-terminal tail between MT1, MT2 and Mel1c. All chimeras were fully capable of binding 2-[(125) I]iodomelatonin and inhibiting adenylyl cyclase. Chimeras containing the full-length Mel1c tail were incapable of activating Galpha(16), while those that contained the complete C-terminal region of either MT1 or MT2 stimulated PLC. Incorporation of the extra portion of the C-terminal tail of Mel1c to either MT1 or MT2 completely abolished the chimeras' ability to stimulate PLC via Galpha(16). In contrast, truncation of the C-terminal tail of Mel1c allowed interaction with Galpha(16). Our results suggest that Galpha(16) can discern structural differences amid the three melatonin receptors and provide evidence for functional distinction of Mel1c from MT1 and MT2 receptors.     

The effect of modification of the carboxyl group in short D-arginine 2-containing enkephalin analogs on their affinity and selectivity for opiate receptors

Radioreceptor binding assay using a membrane fraction from the rat brain was applied to study [D-Arg2, Leu5] enkephalin and two series of its analogues truncated at the C-terminus with a free or modified carboxyl group: tetra- and tripeptide amides and ethyl esters. The affinity to mu-specific opiate receptor subtype of the N-terminal [D-Arg2] tetrapeptide ethyl ester was 44 times as high as that of the tripeptide with a free carboxyl, and thus the ester retained up to 10% of leucine-enkephalin binding potency. However, a comparable esterification of the carboxyl group in the N-terminal [D-Arg2] tripeptide led to a 6-fold reduction in its affinity to mu-receptors. Consequently, identical modifications of the C-terminal carboxyl group in enkephalin analogues of various length can have completely different effects. Substitution of the natural glycine residue by D-arginine residue in position 2 of the enkephalin molecule truncated at the C-terminus increased the mu-receptor binding potency of the tetrapeptide, whereas its delta receptor binding potency declined by more than one order of magnitude. Simultaneous replacement of glycine2 by D-arginine2 and carboxyl amidation resulted in the short enkephalin analogue Tyr--D--Arg--Gly--Phe--NH2, whose affinity to mu receptors was four times as high as that of leucine--enkephalin, the tetrapeptide being 284 times more selective for the mu vs. delta opiate receptors.     

Distinct residues in the carboxyl tail mediate agonist-induced desensitization and internalization of the human dopamine D1 receptor.

We have shown in a previous study that desensitization and internalization of the human dopamine D(1) receptor following short-term agonist exposure are mediated by temporally and biochemically distinct mechanisms. In the present study, we have used site-directed mutagenesis to remove potential phosphorylation sites in the third intracellular loop and carboxyl tail of the dopamine D(1) receptor to study these processes. Mutant D(1) receptors were stably transfected into Chinese hamster ovary cells, and kinetic parameters were measured. Mutations of Ser/Thr residues to alanine in the carboxyl tail demonstrated that the single substitution of Thr-360 abolished agonist-induced phosphorylation and desensitization of the receptor. Isolated mutation of the adjacent glutamic acid Glu-359 also abolished agonist-induced phosphorylation and desensitization of the receptor. These data suggest that Thr-360 in conjunction with Glu-359 may comprise a motif necessary for GRK2-mediated phosphorylation and desensitization. Agonist-induced internalization was not affected with mutation of either the Thr-360 or the Glu-359 residues. However, receptors with Ser/Thr residues mutated in the distal carboxyl tail (Thr-446, Thr-439, and Ser-431) failed to internalize in response to agonist activation, but were able to desensitize normally. These results indicate that agonist-induced desensitization and internalization are regulated by separate and distinct serine and threonine residues within the carboxyl tail of the human dopamine D(1) receptor.     

Motion of carboxyl terminus of Galpha is restricted upon G protein activation. A solution NMR study using semisynthetic Galpha subunits

The carboxyl terminus of the G protein alpha subunit plays a key role in interactions with G protein-coupled receptors. Previous studies that have incorporated covalently attached probes have demonstrated that the carboxyl terminus undergoes conformational changes upon G protein activation. To examine the conformational changes that occur at the carboxyl terminus of Galpha subunits upon G protein activation in a more native system, we generated a semisynthetic Galpha subunit, site-specifically labeled in its carboxyl terminus with 13C amino acids. Using expressed protein ligation, 9-mer peptides were ligated to recombinant Galpha(i1) subunits lacking the corresponding carboxyl-terminal residues. In a receptor-G protein reconstitution assay, the truncated Galpha(i1) subunit could not be activated by receptor; whereas the semisynthetic protein demonstrated functionality that was comparable with recombinant Galpha(i1). To study the conformation of the carboxyl terminus of the semisynthetic G protein, we applied high resolution solution NMR to Galpha subunits containing 13C labels at the corresponding sites in Galpha(i1): Leu-348 (uniform), Gly-352 (alpha carbon), and Phe-354 (ring). In the GDP-bound state, the spectra of the ligated carboxyl terminus appeared similar to the spectra obtained for 13C-labeled free peptide. Upon titration with increasing concentrations of AlF4-, the 13C resonances demonstrated a marked loss of signal intensity in the semisynthetic Galpha subunit but not in free peptide subjected to the same conditions. Because AlF4- complexes with GDP to stabilize an activated state of the Galpha subunit, these results suggest that the Galpha carboxyl terminus is highly mobile in its GDP-bound state but adopts an ordered conformation upon activation by AlF4-.     

A comprehensive structure-function map of the intracellular surface of the human C5a receptor. II. Elucidation of G protein specificity determinants

Within any given cell many G protein-coupled receptors are expressed in the presence of multiple G proteins, yet most receptors couple to a specific subset of G proteins to elicit their programmed response. Numerous studies demonstrate that the carboxyl-terminal five amino acids of the Galpha subunits are a major determinant of specificity, however the receptor determinants of specificity are less clear. We have used a collection of 133 functional mutants of the C5a receptor obtained in a mutagenesis screen targeting the intracellular loops and the carboxyl terminus (Matsumoto, M. L., Narzinski, K., Kiser, P. D., Nikiforovich, G. V., and Baranski, T. J. (2007) J. Biol. Chem. 282, 3105-3121) to investigate how specificity is encoded. Each mutant, originally selected for its ability to signal through a nearly full-length Galpha(i) in yeast, was tested to see whether it could activate three versions of chimeric Galpha subunits consisting of Gpa1 fused to the carboxyl-terminal five amino acids of Galpha(i), Galpha(q), or Galpha(s) in yeast. Surprisingly the carboxyl-terminal tail of the C5a receptor is the most important specificity determinant in that nearly all mutants in this region showed a gain in coupling to Galpha(q) and/or Galpha(s). More than half of the receptors mutated in the second intracellular loop also demonstrated broadened G protein coupling. Given a lack of selective advantage for this broadened signaling in the initial screen, we propose a model in which the carboxyl-terminal tail acts together with the intracellular loops to generate a specificity filter for receptor-G protein interactions that functions primarily to restrict access of incorrect G proteins to the receptor.     

Modifications of the cyclic mu receptor selective tetrapeptide Tyr-c[D-Cys-Phe-D-Pen]NH2 (Et): effects on opioid receptor binding and activation.

The previously described cyclic mu opioid receptor-selective tetrapeptide Tyr-c[D-Cys-Phe-D-Pen]NH2 (Et) (JOM-6) was modified at residues 1 and 3 by substitution with various natural and synthetic amino acids, and/or by alteration of the cyclic system. Effects on mu and delta opioid receptor binding affinities, and on potencies and efficacies as measured by the [35S]-GTPgammaS assay, were evaluated. Affinities at mu and delta receptors were not influenced dramatically by substitution of Tyr1 with conformationally restricted phenolic amino acids. In the [35S]-GTPgammaS assay, all of the peptides tested exhibited a maximal response comparable with that of fentanyl at the mu opioid receptor, and all showed high potency, in the range 0.4-9nM. However, potency changes did not always correlate with affinity, suggesting that the conformation required for binding and the conformation required for activation of the opioid receptors are different. At the delta opioid receptor, none of the peptides were able to produce a response equivalent to that of the full delta agonist BW 373,U86 and only one had an EC50 value of less than 100nM. Lastly, we have identified a peptide, D-Hat-c[D-Cys-Phe-D-Pen]NH2 (Et), with high potency and > 1,000-fold functional selectivity for the mu over delta opioid receptor as measured by the [35S]-GTPgammaS assay.     

Delta Opioid Receptors Regulate Temporoammonic-Activated Feedforward Inhibition to the Mouse CA1 Hippocampus

The opioid system influences learning and memory processes. However, neural mechanisms underlying the modulation of hippocampal activity by opioid receptors remain largely unknown. Here, we compared how mu and delta receptors operate within the mouse CA1 network, and used knock-in mice expressing functional delta opioid receptors fused to the green fluorescent protein (DOR-eGFP) to determine how delta opioid receptor-expressing interneurons integrate within the hippocampal circuitry. Through whole cell patch-clamp recording of CA1 pyramidal neurons from wild-type and DOR-eGFP mice, we found that mu and delta receptors both modulate spontaneous GABAergic inhibition received by these cells. Interestingly, mu but not delta receptor activation decreased the feed-forward inhibitory input evoked by Schaffer collateral stimulation. However, mu and delta agonists modulated GABAergic feed-forward inhibition when evoked upon stimulation of the temporoammonic pathway. In addition, anterograde tracing using biotinylated dextran amine injected into the entorhinal cortex of DOR-eGFP mice suggests the existence of synaptic contacts between temporoammonic afferents and delta receptor-expressing interneurons processes in CA1. Altogether, our data demonstrate a distinct modulatory role of the hippocampal network activity by mu and delta opioid receptors, and show for the first time that delta receptor-expressing interneurons in the CA1 are recruited by the temporoammonic pathway rather than the Schaffer collateral.     

Dopamine D1-D2 Receptor Heteromer-mediated Calcium Release Is Desensitized by D1 Receptor Occupancy with or without Signal Activation: DUAL FUNCTIONAL REGULATION BY G PROTEIN-COUPLED RECEPTOR KINASE 2*

We identified that activation of the G_q-linked dopamine D1-D2 receptor hetero-oligomer generates a PLC-dependent intracellular calcium signal. Confocal FRET between endogenous dopamine D1 and D2 receptors in striatal neurons confirmed a physical interaction between them. Pretreatment with SKF 83959, which selectively activates the D1-D2 receptor heteromer, or SKF 83822, which only activates the D1 receptor homo-oligomer, led to rapid desensitization of the D1-D2 receptor heteromer-mediated calcium signal in both heterologous cells and striatal neurons. This desensitization response was mediated through selective occupancy of the D1 receptor binding pocket. Although SKF 83822 was unable to activate the D1-D2 receptor heteromer, it still permitted desensitization of the calcium signal. This suggested that occupancy of the D1 receptor binding pocket by SKF 83822 resulted in conformational changes sufficient for desensitization without heteromer activation. Bioluminescence resonance energy transfer and co-immunoprecipitation studies indicated an agonist-induced physical association between the D1-D2 receptor heteromeric complex and GRK2. Increased expression of GRK2 led to a decrease in the calcium signal with or without prior exposure to either SKF 83959 or SKF 83822. GRK2 knockdown by siRNA led to an increase in the signal after pretreatment with either agonist. Expression of the catalytically inactive and RGS (regulator of G protein signaling)-mutated GRK2 constructs each led to a partial recovery of the GRK2-attenuated calcium signal. These results indicated that desensitization of the dopamine D1-D2 receptor heteromer-mediated signal can occur by agonist occupancy even without activation and is dually regulated by both the catalytic and RGS domains of GRK2.     

背根神经节神经元阿片受体和离子通道的研究进展

阿片及阿片受体与外周神经系统镇痛机制的研究,随着分子生物学技术的发展,已在受体的分子结构、形态学、分子药理学、离子通道和细胞内信号转导系统等方面取得了显著进展。μ、δ、κ阿片受体分子结构上的部分差异决定了它们各自的功能特征。三种受体在初级感觉神经元分布的比例不同,但都能介导细胞Ｃａ＾２＋通道的抑制和Ｋ＾＋电流增加及减少。阿片受体和通道之间由多种第二信使系统偶联。分子药理学研究表明它们还存在亚型受体     

Exploring the unique pharmacology of a novel opioid receptor, ZFOR1, using molecular modeling and the 'message-address' concept.

Previous studies have probed the structural basis of ligand selectivity in the mu, delta and kappa opioid receptors through the application of molecular modeling techniques in concert with the 'message-address' concept. Here, this approach was used in an attempt to rationalize the unique pharmacological profile of a recently cloned novel opioid receptor, ZFOR1 (ZebraFish Opioid Receptor 1). Specifically, a model of the transmembrane domains of ZFOR1 was constructed and used to explore the binding modes of various prototypical opioid ligands. The results show that the 'message' portion of the binding pocket of ZFOR1 is highly conserved; hence, the binding modes of non-selective opioid ligands are well preserved. In contrast, a small number of variant residues at the extracellular end of the binding pocket, particularly Lys288 (VI:26) and Trp304 (VII:03), are shown to create adverse steric interactions with all delta and kappa selective ligands examined, thereby disrupting their binding modes. These results are consistent with, and serve as an explanation for, the observed pharmacology of this receptor, lending support to both the validity of the 'message-address' concept itself and to the use of molecular modeling approaches in its application.     

Norepinephrine- and phorbol ester-induced phosphorylation of alpha(1a)-adrenergic receptors. Functional aspects

Maximal adrenergic responses in Rat-1 fibroblasts expressing alpha(1a)-adrenergic receptors are not blocked by activation of protein kinase C. In contrast, activation of protein kinase C induces the phosphorylation of alpha(1b)-adrenoreceptors and blocks their actions. The effect of norepinephrine and phorbol esters on alpha(1a)-adrenoreceptor phosphorylation and coupling to G proteins were studied. Both stimuli lead to dose-dependent receptor phosphorylation. Interestingly, protein kinase C activation affected to a much lesser extent the actions of alpha(1a)-adrenergic receptors than those of the alpha(1b) subtype (norepinephrine elicited increases in calcium in whole cells and [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding to membranes). Basal phosphorylation of alpha(1a)-adrenergic receptors was much less than that observed with the alpha(1b) subtype. The carboxyl terminus seems to be the main domain for receptor phosphorylation. Therefore, chimeric receptors, where the carboxyl-terminal tails of alpha(1a) and alpha(1b) adrenergic receptors were exchanged, were constructed and expressed. alpha(1a)-Adrenoreceptors wearing the carboxyl tail of the alpha(1b) subtype had a high basal phosphorylation and displayed a strong phosphorylation in response to norepinephrine and phorbol esters. Our results demonstrate that stimulation of alpha(1a)-adrenergic receptor, or activation of protein kinase C, leads to alpha(1a)-adrenergic receptor phosphorylation. alpha(1a)-Adrenoreceptors are affected to a much lesser extent than alpha(1b)-adrenoreceptors by protein kinase C activation.     

Comparison of the amino acid residues in the sixth transmembrane domains accessible in the binding-site crevices of mu, delta, and kappa opioid receptors.

We have mapped the residues in the sixth transmembrane domains (TMs 6) of the mu, delta, and kappa opioid receptors that are accessible in the binding-site crevices by the substituted cysteine accessibility method (SCAM). We previously showed that ligand binding to the C7.38S mutants of the mu and kappa receptors and the wild-type delta receptor was relatively insensitive to methanethiosulfonate ethylammonium (MTSEA), a positively charged sulfhydryl-specific reagent. These MTSEA-insensitive constructs were used as the templates, and 22 consecutive residues in TM6 (excluding C6.47) of each receptor were mutated to cysteine, 1 at a time. Most mutants retained binding affinities for [3H]diprenorphine, a nonselective opioid antagonist, similar to that of the template receptors. Treatment with MTSEA significantly inhibited [3H]diprenorphine binding to 11 of 22 mutants of the rat mu receptor and 9 of 22 mutants of the human delta receptor and 10 of 22 mutants of the human kappa receptor. Naloxone or diprenorphine protected all sensitive mutants, except the A6.42(287)C mu mutant. Thus, V6.40, F6.44, W6.48, I6.51, Y6.54, V6.55, I6.56, I6.57, K6.58, and A6.59 of the mu receptor; F6.44, I6.51, F6.54, V6.55, I6.56, V6.57, W6.58, T6.59, and L6.60 of the delta receptor; and F6.44, W6.48, I6.51, F6.54, I6.55, L6.56, V6.57, E6.58, A6.59, and L6.60 of the kappa receptor are on the water-accessible surface of the binding-site crevices. The accessibility patterns of residues in the TMs 6 of the mu, delta, and kappa opioid receptors are consistent with the notion that the TMs 6 are in alpha-helical conformations with a narrow strip of accessibility on the intracellular side of 6.54 and a wider area of accessibility on the extracellular side of 6.54, likely due to a proline kink at 6.50 that bends the helix in toward the binding pocket and enables considerable motion in this region. The wider exposure of residues 6.55-6.60 to the binding-site crevice, combined with the divergent amino acid sequences, is consistent with the inferred role of residues in this region in determining ligand binding selectivity. The conservation of the accessibility pattern on the cytoplasmic side of 6.54 suggests that this region may be important for receptor activation. This accessibility pattern is similar to that of the D2 dopamine receptor, the only other GPCR in which TM6 has been mapped by SCAM. That opioid receptors and the remotely related D2 dopamine receptor have similar accessibility patterns in TM6 suggest that these segments of GPCRs in the rhodopsin-like subfamily not only share secondary structure but also are packed similarly into the transmembrane bundle and thus have similar tertiary structure.