E2 conjugating enzyme selectivity and requirements for function of the E3 ubiquitin ligase CHIP

The transfer of ubiquitin (Ub) to a substrate protein requires a cascade of E1 activating, E2 conjugating, and E3 ligating enzymes. E3 Ub ligases containing U-box and RING domains bind both E2～Ub conjugates and substrates to facilitate transfer of the Ub molecule. Although the overall mode of action of E3 ligases is well established, many of the mechanistic details that determine the outcome of ubiquitination are poorly understood. CHIP (carboxyl terminus of Hsc70-interacting protein) is a U-box E3 ligase that serves as a co-chaperone to heat shock proteins and is critical for the regulation of unfolded proteins in the cytosol. We have performed a systematic analysis of the interactions of CHIP with E2 conjugating enzymes and found that only a subset bind and function. Moreover, some E2 enzymes function in pairs to create products that neither create individually. Characterization of the products of these reactions showed that different E2 enzymes produce different ubiquitination products, i.e. that E2 determines the outcome of Ub transfer. Site-directed mutagenesis on the E2 enzymes Ube2D1 and Ube2L3 (UbcH5a and UbcH7) established that an SPA motif in loop 7 of E2 is required for binding to CHIP but is not sufficient for activation of the E2～Ub conjugate and consequent ubiquitination activity. These data support the proposal that the E2 SPA motif provides specificity for binding to CHIP, whereas activation of the E2～Ub conjugate is derived from other molecular determinants.     

Ubiquitin manipulation by an E2 conjugating enzyme using a novel covalent intermediate

Degradation of misfolded and damaged proteins by the 26 S proteasome requires the substrate to be tagged with a polyubiquitin chain. Assembly of polyubiquitin chains and subsequent substrate labeling potentially involves three enzymes, an E1, E2, and E3. E2 proteins are key enzymes and form a thioester intermediate through their catalytic cysteine with the C-terminal glycine (Gly76) of ubiquitin. This thioester intermediate is easily hydrolyzed in vitro and has eluded structural characterization. To overcome this, we have engineered a novel ubiquitin-E2 disulfide-linked complex by mutating Gly76 to Cys76 in ubiquitin. Reaction of Ubc1, an E2 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, with this mutant ubiquitin resulted in an ubiquitin-E2 disulfide that could be purified and was stable for several weeks. Chemical shift perturbation analysis of the disulfide ubiquitin-Ubc1 complex by NMR spectroscopy reveals an ubiquitin-Ubc1 interface similar to that for the ubiquitin-E2 thioester. In addition to the typical E2 catalytic domain, Ubc1 contains an ubiquitin-associated (UBA) domain, and we have utilized NMR spectroscopy to demonstrate that in this disulfide complex the UBA domain is freely accessible to non-covalently bind a second molecule of ubiquitin. The ability of the Ubc1 to bind two ubiquitin molecules suggests that the UBA domain does not interact with the thioester-bound ubiquitin during polyubiquitin chain formation. Thus, construction of this novel ubiquitin-E2 disulfide provides a method to characterize structurally the first step in polyubiquitin chain assembly by Ubc1 and its related class II enzymes.     

Purification, Characterization, and Gene Cloning of Ceriporiopsis sp. Strain MD-1 Peroxidases That Decolorize Human Hair Melanin

Ceriporiopsis sp. strain MD-1, isolated from forest soil, produced several extracellular enzymes that decolorized human hair melanin. Among them, three enzymes (E1, E2-1, and E2-2) were purified to homogeneity and characterized. The enzymes required hydrogen peroxide in their enzyme reactions and, typical of other fungal peroxidases, oxidized various phenol compounds such as guaiacol, but not 3,4-dimethoxybenzyl alcohol. The spectra of the three enzymes showed an absorption maximum at 406 nm, indicating that they were heme proteins. However, the A₄₀₆/A₂₈₀ values of the enzymes were below 0.4, which was lower than those of other peroxidases. E2-1 and E2-2 were similar to each other in their molecular and catalytic properties, and they possibly represent products of posttranslational modifications and/or allelic variants of the same gene, mdcA. The corresponding cDNA was cloned and sequenced; the deduced amino acid sequence showed high identities to the manganese peroxidases from other microorganisms. The specific activities and K_m values of E2-1 and E2-2 for synthetic and human hair melanins were much higher than those of Phanerochaete chrysosporium manganese peroxidase and lignin peroxidase.     

植物SUMO化修饰及其生物学功能

SUMO化修饰是细胞内蛋白质功能调节的重要方式之一。植物中的SUMO化修饰途径由SUMO分子和SUMO化酶系组成。SUMO化修饰是一个可逆的动态过程。SUMO前体蛋白在SUMO特异性蛋白酶的作用下成熟,随后通过SUMO活化酶、SUMO结合酶和SUMO连接酶将靶蛋白SUMO化,最后SUMO特异性蛋白酶将SUMO与靶蛋白分离,重新进入SUMO化循环。初步研究表明,植物SUMO化修饰参与植物花期调控、激素信号转导、抗病防御以及逆境应答等生理过程。     

Induction of NAD(P)H quinone oxidoreductase and glutathione S-transferase activities in livers of female August-Copenhagen Irish rats treated chronically with estradiol: comparison with the Sprague-Dawley rat

Estradiol (E2) has been linked to both, protection against damage associated with chronic diseases or exposure to chemicals, and to the incidence of cancer. In its protective role, E2 appears to attenuate oxidative stress while as a carcinogen, E2 damages macromolecules via formation of reactive catechol metabolites. Alterations in the expression of antioxidant and xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes upon administration of pharmacological doses of E2 have been previously identified, but the effect of chronic exposure to low concentrations of E2 on activities of those enzymes in liver is unclear. The August-Copenhagen Irish (ACI) rat is more sensitive to estrogen-induced carcinogenesis than the Sprague-Dawley rat. Accordingly, the effect of treatment of female ACI and Sprague-Dawley rats for 6 weeks with E2 on activities of NAD(P)H quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1), glutathione peroxidase, glutathione S-transferase (GST), phenol sulfotransferase (SULT1A1), cytochrome P450 (CYP450) and UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) was studied. Basal expression of these enzymes was similar in livers from both strains prior to exposure to E2. However, only NQO1 and GST activity was increased (3- and 2.5-fold, respectively) in liver cytosol of ACI rats treated with E2. In contrast, only NQO1 activity was increased modestly in livers of Sprague-Dawley rats. Other enzymes were not significantly affected in the livers of ACI or Sprague-Dawley rats following chronic treatment with E2. The selective induction of NQO1 and GST activity suggests that under physiological conditions, E2 may protect against oxidative stress via elevation of these antioxidant enzymes. The marked induction of NQO1 and GST in the ACI rat indicates a potential for this strain to be used as a model to study the E2-mediated modulation of these enzymes in tissues that are either sensitive to E2 carcinogenesis or to its protective effects.     

植物SUMO化修饰及其生物学功能

SUMO化修饰是细胞内蛋白质功能调节的重要方式之一。植物中的SUMO化修饰途径由SUMO分子和SUMO化酶系组成。SUMO化修饰是一个可逆的动态过程。SUMO前体蛋白在SUMO特异性蛋白酶的作用下成熟, 随后通过SUMO活化酶、SUMO结合酶和SUMO连接酶将靶蛋白SUMO化, 最后SUMO特异性蛋白酶将SUMO与靶蛋白分离, 重新进入SUMO化循环。初步研究表明, 植物SUMO化修饰参与植物花期调控、激素信号转导、抗病防御以及逆境应答等生理过程。     

Activation of UBC5 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme by the RING finger of ROC1 and assembly of active ubiquitin ligases by all cullins

Protein ubiquitination plays an important role in regulating the abundance and conformation of a broad range of eukaryotic proteins. This process involves a cascade of enzymes including ubiquitin-activating enzymes (E1), ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes (E2), and ubiquitin ligases (E3). E1 and E2 represent two families of structurally related proteins and are relatively well characterized. In contrast, the nature and mechanism of E3, proposed to contain activities in catalyzing isopeptide bond formation (ubiquitin ligation) and substrate targeting, remains inadequately understood. Two major families of E3 ubiquitin ligases, the HECT (for homologous to E6-AP C terminus) family and the RING family, have been identified that utilize distinct mechanisms in promoting isopeptide bond formation. Here, we showed that purified RING finger domain of ROC1, an essential subunit of SKP1-cullin/CDC53-F box protein ubiquitin ligases, was sufficient to activate UBCH5c to synthesize polyubiquitin chains. The sequence flanking the RING finger in ROC1 did not contribute to UBCH5c activation, but was required for binding with CUL1. We demonstrated that all cullins, through their binding with ROC proteins, constituted active ubiquitin ligases, suggesting the existence in vivo of a large number of cullin-RING ubiquitin ligases. These results are consistent with the notion that the RING finger domains allosterically activate E2. We suggest that RING-E2, rather than cullin-RING, constitutes the catalytic core of the ubiquitin ligase and that one major function of the cullin subunit is to assemble the RING-E2 catalytic core and substrates together.     

Interactions between the quality control ubiquitin ligase CHIP and ubiquitin conjugating enzymes

Background  

Ubiquitin (E3) ligases interact with specific ubiquitin conjugating (E2) enzymes to ubiquitinate particular substrate proteins. As the combination of E2 and E3 dictates the type and biological consequence of ubiquitination, it is important to understand the basis of specificity in E2:E3 interactions. The E3 ligase CHIP interacts with Hsp70 and Hsp90 and ubiquitinates client proteins that are chaperoned by these heat shock proteins. CHIP interacts with two types of E2 enzymes, UbcH5 and Ubc13-Uev1a. It is unclear, however, why CHIP binds these E2 enzymes rather than others, and whether CHIP interacts preferentially with UbcH5 or Ubc13-Uev1a, which form different types of polyubiquitin chains.     

Identification of molecular determinants required for interaction of ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes and RING finger proteins.

Recent results from several laboratories suggest that the interaction of E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes with the RING finger domain has a central role in mediating the transfer of ubiquitin to proteins. Here we present a mutational analysis of the interaction between the E2 enzyme UbcM4/UbcH7 and three different RING finger proteins, termed UIPs, which, like Parkin, contain a RING1-IBR-RING2 motif. The results show that the E2 enzyme binds to the RING1 domain but not to the other cysteine/histidine-rich domains of the RING1-IBR-RING2 motif. Three regions within the UbcM4 molecule are involved in this interaction: the H1 alpha helix, loop L1, connecting the third and fourth strand of the beta sheet, and loop L2, located between the fourth beta strand and the second alpha helix. Loop L2 plays an important role in determining the specificity of interaction. The effects of L2 mutations on UbcM4/UIP interaction are different for each UIP, indicating that RING finger domains can vary considerably in their structural requirements for binding to E2 enzymes. The result that single amino-acid changes can regulate binding of E2 enzymes to different RING finger proteins suggests a novel approach to experimentally manipulate proteolytic pathways mediated by RING finger proteins.     

The APC11 RING-H2 finger mediates E2-dependent ubiquitination

Polyubiquitination marks proteins for degradation by the 26S proteasome and is carried out by a cascade of enzymes that includes ubiquitin-activating enzymes (E1s), ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes (E2s), and ubiquitin ligases (E3s). The anaphase-promoting complex or cyclosome (APC/C) comprises a multisubunit ubiquitin ligase that mediates mitotic progression. Here, we provide evidence that the Saccharomyces cerevisiae RING-H2 finger protein Apc11 defines the minimal ubiquitin ligase activity of the APC. We found that the integrity of the Apc11p RING-H2 finger was essential for budding yeast cell viability, Using purified, recombinant proteins we showed that Apc11p interacted directly with the Ubc4 ubiquitin conjugating enzyme (E2). Furthermore, purified Apc11p was capable of mediating E1- and E2-dependent ubiquitination of protein substrates, including Clb2p, in vitro. The ability of Apc11p to act as an E3 was dependent on the integrity of the RING-H2 finger, but did not require the presence of the cullin-like APC subunit Apc2p. We suggest that Apc11p is responsible for recruiting E2s to the APC and for mediating the subsequent transfer of ubiquitin to APC substrates in vivo.     

The Wnts

Background

The eukaryotic ubiquitin-conjugation system sets the turnover rate of many proteins and includes activating enzymes (E1s), conjugating enzymes (UBCs/E2s), and ubiquitin-protein ligases (E3s), which are responsible for activation, covalent attachment and substrate recognition, respectively. There are also ubiquitin-like proteins with distinct functions, which require their own E1s and E2s for attachment. We describe the results of RNA interference (RNAi) experiments on the E1s, UBC/E2s and ubiquitin-like proteins in Caenorhabditis elegans. We also present a phylogenetic analysis of UBCs.

Results

The C. elegans genome encodes 20 UBCs and three ubiquitin E2 variant proteins. RNAi shows that only four UBCs are essential for embryogenesis: LET-70 (UBC-2), a functional homolog of yeast Ubc4/5p, UBC-9, an ortholog of yeast Ubc9p, which transfers the ubiquitin-like modifier SUMO, UBC-12, an ortholog of yeast Ubc12p, which transfers the ubiquitin-like modifier Rub1/Nedd8, and UBC-14, an ortholog of Drosophila Courtless. RNAi of ubc-20, an ortholog of yeast UBC1, results in a low frequency of arrested larval development. A phylogenetic analysis of C. elegans, Drosophila and human UBCs shows that this protein family can be divided into 18 groups, 13 of which include members from all three species. The activating enzymes and the ubiquitin-like proteins NED-8 and SUMO are required for embryogenesis.

Conclusions

The number of UBC genes appears to increase with developmental complexity, and our results suggest functional overlap in many of these enzymes. The ubiquitin-like proteins NED-8 and SUMO and their corresponding activating enzymes are required for embryogenesis.     

UBE2D2 is not involved in MuRF1-dependent muscle wasting during hindlimb suspension

The Ubiquitin Proteasome System (UPS) is mainly responsible for the increased protein breakdown observed in muscle wasting. The E3 ligase MuRF1 is so far the only enzyme known to direct the main contractile proteins for degradation (i.e. troponin I, myosin heavy chains and actin). However, MuRF1 does not possess any catalytic activity and thus depends on the presence of a dedicated E2 for catalyzing the covalent binding of polyubiquitin (polyUb) chains on the substrates. The E2 enzymes belonging to the UBE2D family are commonly used for in vitro ubiquitination assays but no experimental data suggesting their physiological role as bona fide MuRF1-interacting E2 enzymes are available. In this work, we first found that the mRNA levels of critical E3 enzymes implicated in the atrophying program (MuRF1, MAFbx, Nedd4 and to a lesser extent Mdm2) are tightly and rapidly controlled during the atrophy (up regulation) and recovery (down regulation) phases in the soleus muscle from hindlimb suspended rats. By contrast, E3 ligases (Ozz, ASB2β and E4b) implicated in other processes (muscle development or regeneration) poorly responded to atrophy and recovery. UBE2B, an E2 enzyme systematically up regulated in various catabolic situations, was controlled at the mRNA levels like the E3s implicated in the atrophying process. By contrast, UBE2D2 was progressively repressed during atrophy and recovery, which makes it a poor candidate for a role during muscle atrophy. In addition, UBE2D2 did not exhibit any affinity with MuRF1 using either yeast two-hybrid or Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) approaches. Finally, UBE2D2 was unable to promote the degradation of the MuRF1 substrate α-actin in HEK293T cells, suggesting that no functional interaction exists between these enzymes within a cellular context. Altogether, our data strongly suggest that UBE2D2 is not the cognate ubiquitinating enzyme for MuRF1 and that peculiar properties of UBE2D enzymes may have biased in vitro ubiquitination assays.     

Protein interactions in the sumoylation cascade: lessons from X-ray structures

Sumoylation is a multi-step protein modification reaction in which SUMO (small ubiquitin-like modifier) proteins are covalently attached to lysine residues of substrate proteins. Here, we compare the sequences and structures of modifiers and enzymes involved in sumoylation with those of the related ubiquitination and neddylation cascades. By using available structural data on modifier/enzyme/substrate interactions, we discuss and model sumoylation complexes that include SUMO-1 and the E1 and E2 enzymes Aos1-uba2 and ubc9, or SUMO-1 and E2 together with the E3 ligase RanBP2 and its substrate RanGAP1. Their comparison provides insight into the protein interactions underlying sumoylation, and suggests how SUMO proteins may be translocated between enzymes during the various steps of the protein modification reaction.     

Crystal Structure of the Human Ubiquitin-activating Enzyme 5 (UBA5) Bound to ATP: MECHANISTIC INSIGHTS INTO A MINIMALISTIC E1 ENZYME*

E1 ubiquitin-activating enzymes (UBAs) are large multidomain proteins that catalyze formation of a thioester bond between the terminal carboxylate of a ubiquitin or ubiquitin-like modifier (UBL) and a conserved cysteine in an E2 protein, producing reactive ubiquityl units for subsequent ligation to substrate lysines. Two important E1 reaction intermediates have been identified: a ubiquityl-adenylate phosphoester and a ubiquityl-enzyme thioester. However, the mechanism of thioester bond formation and its subsequent transfer to an E2 enzyme remains poorly understood. We have determined the crystal structure of the human UFM1 (ubiquitin-fold modifier 1) E1-activating enzyme UBA5, bound to ATP, revealing a structure that shares similarities with both large canonical E1 enzymes and smaller ancestral E1-like enzymes. In contrast to other E1 active site cysteines, which are in a variably sized domain that is separate and flexible relative to the adenylation domain, the catalytic cysteine of UBA5 (Cys²⁵⁰) is part of the adenylation domain in an α-helical motif. The novel position of the UBA5 catalytic cysteine and conformational changes associated with ATP binding provides insight into the possible mechanisms through which the ubiquityl-enzyme thioester is formed. These studies reveal structural features that further our understanding of the UBA5 enzyme reaction mechanism and provide insight into the evolution of ubiquitin activation.     

Variation in the organization and subunit composition of the mammalian pyruvate dehydrogenase complex E2/E3BP core assembly

Crucial to glucose homoeostasis in humans, the hPDC (human pyruvate dehydrogenase complex) is a massive molecular machine comprising multiple copies of three distinct enzymes (E1-E3) and an accessory subunit, E3BP (E3-binding protein). Its icosahedral E2/E3BP 60-meric 'core' provides the central structural and mechanistic framework ensuring favourable E1 and E3 positioning and enzyme co-operativity. Current core models indicate either a 48E2+12E3BP or a 40E2+20E3BP subunit composition. In the present study, we demonstrate clear differences in subunit content and organization between the recombinant hPDC core (rhPDC; 40E2+20E3BP), generated under defined conditions where E3BP is produced in excess, and its native bovine (48E2+12E3BP) counterpart. The results of the present study provide a rational basis for resolving apparent differences between previous models, both obtained using rhE2/E3BP core assemblies where no account was taken of relative E2 and E3BP expression levels. Mathematical modelling predicts that an 'average' 48E2+12E3BP core arrangement allows maximum flexibility in assembly, while providing the appropriate balance of bound E1 and E3 enzymes for optimal catalytic efficiency and regulatory fine-tuning. We also show that the rhE2/E3BP and bovine E2/E3BP cores bind E3s with a 2:1 stoichiometry, and propose that mammalian PDC comprises a heterogeneous population of assemblies incorporating a network of E3 (and possibly E1) cross-bridges above the core surface.     

An allosteric inhibitor of the human Cdc34 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme

In the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS), E2 enzymes mediate the conjugation of ubiquitin to substrates and thereby control protein stability and interactions. The E2 enzyme hCdc34 catalyzes the ubiquitination of hundreds of proteins in conjunction with the cullin-RING (CRL) superfamily of E3 enzymes. We identified a small molecule termed CC0651 that selectively inhibits hCdc34. Structure determination revealed that CC0651 inserts into a cryptic binding pocket on hCdc34 distant from the catalytic site, causing subtle but wholesale displacement of E2 secondary structural elements. CC0651 analogs inhibited proliferation of human cancer cell lines and caused accumulation of the SCF(Skp2) substrate p27(Kip1). CC0651 does not affect hCdc34 interactions with E1 or E3 enzymes or the formation of the ubiquitin thioester but instead interferes with the discharge of ubiquitin to acceptor lysine residues. E2 enzymes are thus susceptible to noncatalytic site inhibition and may represent a viable class of drug target in the UPS.     

Binding to E1 and E3 is mutually exclusive for the human autophagy E2 Atg3

Ubiquitin‐like proteins (UBLs) are activated, transferred and conjugated by E1‐E2‐E3 enzyme cascades. E2 enzymes for canonical UBLs such as ubiquitin, SUMO, and NEDD8 typically use common surfaces to bind to E1 and E3 enzymes. Thus, canonical E2s are required to disengage from E1 prior to E3‐mediated UBL ligation. However, E1, E2, and E3 enzymes in the autophagy pathway are structurally and functionally distinct from canonical enzymes, and it has not been possible to predict whether autophagy UBL cascades are organized according to the same principles. Here, we address this question for the pathway mediating lipidation of the human autophagy UBL, LC3. We utilized bioinformatic and experimental approaches to identify a distinctive region in the autophagy E2, Atg3, that binds to the autophagy E3, Atg12～Atg5‐Atg16. Short peptides corresponding to this Atg3 sequence inhibit LC3 lipidation in vitro. Notably, the E3‐binding site on Atg3 overlaps with the binding site for the E1, Atg7. Accordingly, the E3 competes with Atg7 for binding to Atg3, implying that Atg3 likely cycles back and forth between binding to Atg7 for loading with the UBL LC3 and binding to E3 to promote LC3 lipidation. The results show that common organizational principles underlie canonical and noncanonical UBL transfer cascades, but are established through distinct structural features.     

Structural bases for the specific interactions between the E2 and E3 components of the Thermus thermophilus 2-oxo acid dehydrogenase complexes

Pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH), branched-chain 2-oxo acid dehydrogenase (BCDH) and 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase (OGDH) are multienzyme complexes that play crucial roles in several common metabolic pathways. These enzymes belong to a family of 2-oxo acid dehydrogenase complexes that contain multiple copies of three different components (E1, E2 and E3). For the Thermus thermophilus enzymes, depending on its substrate specificity (pyruvate, branched-chain 2-oxo acid or 2-oxoglutarate), each complex has distinctive E1 (E1p, E1b or E1o) and E2 (E2p, E2b or E2o) components and one of the two possible E3 components (E3b and E3o). (The suffixes, p, b and o identify their respective enzymes, PDH, BCDH and OGDH.) Our biochemical characterization demonstrates that only three specific E3*E2 complexes can form (E3b*E2p, E3b*E2b and E3o*E2o). X-ray analyses of complexes formed between the E3 components and the peripheral subunit-binding domains (PSBDs), derived from the corresponding E2-binding partners, reveal that E3b interacts with E2p and E2b in essentially the same manner as observed for Geobacillus stearothermophilus E3*E2p, whereas E3o interacts with E2o in a novel fashion. The buried intermolecular surfaces of the E3b*PSBDp/b and E3o*PSBDo complexes differ in size, shape and charge distribution and thus, these differences presumably confer the binding specificities for the complexes.