An analysis of Le Fort I maxillary advancement in cleft lip and palate patients.

We present a series of 24 consecutive cleft lip and palate patients aged 16 to 46 years (mean age 27 years) who underwent Le Fort I maxillary advancement by the senior author over the past 8 years. Two groups, one of 12 patients with wire fixation and one of 12 patients with miniplate fixation, were evaluated. Each group had 10 unilateral and 2 bilateral clefts. All patients were grafted with autogenous bone (8 cranial, 14 iliac, and 2 mandibular). Horizontal advancement was 3 mm to 2 cm (with a mean of 7.8 mm). Vertical movement ranged from a shortening of 5 mm to a lengthening of 1.3 cm (mean 2.3 mm of lengthening). The amount and timing of relapse were compared in both the horizontal and vertical dimensions. The plated group was more stable in both the horizontal and vertical dimensions (p < 0.05). No significant skeletal relapses occurred after the first year. Statistically significant dental relapse occurred only in the wired group. Three patients developed transverse collapse of the small maxillary cleft segment, and four developed incisor angulation to compensate for maxillary skeletal relapse. The presence of a pharyngeal flap at the time of advancement appeared to increase relapse in both horizontal and vertical dimensions (p < 0.03), but there were too few patients (7 of 24) with pharyngeal flaps to prove this conclusively. We also concluded that pterygomandibular grafting is not necessary to achieve excellent results using miniplate fixation; autogenous grafting of the anterior maxillary osteotomy alone provides the necessary stability.     

Biomechanical interactions of different mini-plate fixations and maxilla advancements in the Le Fort I Osteotomy: a finite element analysis

This study investigates the biomechanical interaction of different mini-plate fixation types (shapes/sizes and patterns) with segmental advancement levels on the Le Fort I osteotomy using the non-linear finite element (FE) approach. Nine models were generated under a standard 1-piece LeFort I osteotomy for advancement with 3, 6 and 9 mm distances and four mini-plates with three fixation patterns including LL, LI, and II patterns placed on the maxillae models by integrating computed tomography images and computer-aided design system. The axial and oblique occlusal forces were 250 N applied to each premolar/molar and 125 N applied at 30° inclination to the tooth long axis and from palatal to buccal, respectively. The relative micro-movement values between the two maxillary bone segments and maximum mini-plate stress increased obviously with maxilla advancement increment and the increasing trend can be fitted by exponential curve. The corresponding values in II mini-plate fixation presented apparently high values in all simulated cases. The mini-plate stress concentration locations were found at the bending regions to increase high fracture risk. The mini-plate yield strength can be mapped to a critical (limited) advancement for three types of fixations for safe consideration. This study concluded that L-shaped mini-plates with lateral fixation are recommended to provide better stability. The risk for mini-plate fracture and bone relapse increases when maxillary advancement is larger than a critical value of 5 mm in the Le Fort I osteotomy.     

The Le Fort III advancement osteotomy in the child under 7 years of age

This is a longitudinal study of 12 patients with craniofacial synostosis syndromes (Crouzon's, Apert's, Pfeiffer's) who underwent Le Fort III advancement under the age of 7 years (average age 5.1 years, range 4.0 to 6.7 years). The average follow-up was 5.0 years and included clinical, dental, and cephalometric examinations according to a prescribed protocol. The study demonstrated that the procedure could be safely performed in the younger child with an acceptable level of morbidity. There was a remarkable degree of postoperative stability of the maxillary segment. However, although vertical (inferior) growth or movement of the midfacial segment was demonstrated, there was minimal, if any, anterior or horizontal growth. Any occlusal disharmony developing during the period of follow-up could be attributed to anticipated mandibular development and could be corrected by orthognathic surgery. The roles of surgical overcorrection and anterior-pull headgear therapy after release of intermaxillary fixation are also discussed. The Le Fort III osteotomy is justifiably indicated during early childhood for psychological and physiologic reasons.     

Blindness as a complication of Le Fort I osteotomy for maxillary distraction

High Le Fort I osteotomy and maxillary distraction has become an accepted method for the treatment of maxillary retrusion in children and teenagers with cleft lip and palate or craniofacial anomalies. This procedure effectively corrects the dentofacial deformity in these patients. No major surgical morbidity has been reported. During the past 4 years, 94 cleft patients with maxillary hypoplasia received Le Fort I osteotomy and distraction osteogenesis at the authors' center. Two of them developed blindness after this operation. The first case was a girl with bilateral cleft lip and palate with median facial dysplasia. She received high Le Fort I osteotomy at age 12 years 4 months to correct maxillary retrusion. Right eye swelling and ecchymosis was found after surgery. The patient complained of vision loss in that eye 2 days later. Computed tomography showed subarachnoid hemorrhage and skull base hematoma. There were no atypical fractures in the orbit, pterygoid plates, sphenoid bone, and skull base. Angiogram revealed left ophthalmic and basilar artery aneurysm. The second case was a 12-year-old boy with left cleft lip and palate. He received Le Fort I osteotomy to correct maxillary retrusion. During surgery, abnormal pupil dilatation was found after the osteotomy and down-fracture of maxilla. Emergent computed tomography found no hemorrhage or atypical fractures. Examination revealed complete left optic neuropathy and partial right abducens nerve palsy with mydriasis. Magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic resonance angiography, and repeated computed tomography revealed no sign of orbital injury, vascular problem, or abnormal fractures. The cause of blindness was unknown. In both cases, a steroid was used. Maxillary distraction was continued. Recovery of meaningful visual sense did not occur after 3 and 2 years' follow-up, respectively. A review of the literature revealed five other patients who suffered from visual loss after Le Fort I osteotomy. Inadvertent skull base fractures were identified in two cases, but a cause for the blindness was not known in the others. Induced hypotension and indirect trauma may be responsible for the optic nerve injury. In none of the cases was meaningful visual sense recovered, although high-dose steroids were given. In conclusion, a total of seven cases developed blindness after Le Fort I osteotomy. Once blindness develops, the prognosis is poor. High Le Fort I osteotomy should be performed with extreme care, and perhaps the informed consent should include visual loss as a complication of the procedure.     

Lip-nasal aesthetics following Le Fort I osteotomy

Forty-one patients undergoing Le Fort I osteotomy for superior and/or anterior repositioning of the maxilla were prospectively studied for changes in soft-tissue morphology of the nasomaxillary region. Nasal parameters studied were changes in interalar rim width and nasal tip projection. It was observed that alar rim width increases with anterior and/or superior repositioning of the maxilla, but increases in nasal tip projection occur only when there is an anterior vector of maxillary movement. These nasal changes could not be quantitatively correlated to magnitude of maxillary movement. Lip changes studied were the horizontal displacement at the vermilion border and subnasale versus that of the incisal edge and point A, respectively, when the maxilla is sagittally advanced and the vertical shortening of the lip versus that of the incisal edge when the maxilla is shortened. Using linear regression analysis, horizontal displacement of the upper lip at the vermilion border was 0.82 +/- 0.13 mm for every 1 mm of maxillary advancement at the incisal edge (p less than 0.001) and 0.51 +/- 0.13 at the subnasale for every 1 mm of maxillary advancement at point A (p less than 0.001). Eighty percent of patients undergoing maxillary intrusive procedures had lip shortening ranging from 20 to 50 percent of the vertical maxillary reduction. Surprisingly, no statistically significant correlation could be demonstrated for lip shortening versus extent of vertical maxillary reduction. Previous literature in disagreement with these findings is discussed. Guidelines for treatment planning utilizing these data are suggested.     

The Le Fort III osteotomy: to distract or not to distract?

Treatment of the craniofacial dysostoses (e.g., Crouzon, Apert, Pfeiffer, Saethre-Chotzen syndromes) is critically dependent on the successful advancement of the midface with a Le Fort III procedure. The purpose of this retrospective clinical outcome study was to evaluate a new technique for distracting the Le Fort III procedure and to compare its results in growing children with those of the standard Le Fort III osteotomy. The records of 22 children were reviewed; 10 patients (mean age, 6.5 years) underwent a standard Le Fort III procedure, and 12 patients (mean age, 7.5 years) underwent a Le Fort III distraction procedure. The distraction group included two separate techniques, bilateral buried distraction (n = 2) and halo distraction (n = 10). Preoperative and 2- to 3-month postoperative cephalograms were analyzed. The average horizontal advancement achieved in the standard Le Fort III group was 6 mm, compared with 19 mm of advancement in the distraction group (p 相似文献   

Predictors of velopharyngeal insufficiency in cleft palate orthognathic surgery

The purpose of this study was to appraise the value of preoperative speech assessments, nasopharyngoscopy, and surgical models as predictors of velopharyngeal deterioration after a Le Fort I maxillary advancement in cleft patients. This retrospective study involved a series of 26 cleft patients (16 unilateral complete and nine bilateral complete cleft lips and palates, and one isolated complete cleft palate) who had Le Fort I maxillary advancements between March 1, 1993, and February 7, 1996. The 13 male patients and 13 female patients ranged in age from 15.3 to 46 years (mean age, 19.5 years). Four of these patients had previously undergone pharyngeal flap surgery. Eleven patients had palatal fistulas and one had a bifid uvula that was repaired at the time of orthognathic surgery. Patients with perceived hypernasal speech preoperatively all had hypernasality after advancement (nine of nine). Velopharyngeal insufficiency was observed in two of the 16 whose resonance preoperatively was within normal limits. Speech assessment, therefore, predicted accurately the postoperative status in 23 of 26 patients. Twelve patients had preoperative nasopharyngoscopy that indicated a high risk for velopharyngeal insufficiency (borderline or inadequate closure). Nine of these patients had postoperative velopharyngeal insufficiency. Two of the 14 patients not judged at risk by nasopharyngoscopy developed velopharyngeal insufficiency. Therefore, 21 of the 26 patients were accurately predicted by nasopharyngoscopy. Scoping detected borderline velopharyngeal insufficiency in one patient who was not detected by speech alone. The combined predictive value of speech and scope identified all but one patient who would develop postoperative velopharyngeal insufficiency. The degree of anteroposterior movement determined from surgical models was not predictive of the outcome. Patients with hypernasal speech preoperatively continue to have hypernasal speech after Le Fort I advancement. Preoperative perceptual speech assessment by specially trained speech-language pathologists is an excellent test for predicting postoperative velopharyngeal insufficiency status. Nasopharyngoscopy is an invasive and resource-dependent test that should be assessed with respect to cost effectiveness. In this series, only one patient's risk was more accurately predicted using nasopharyngoscopy than by speech assessment alone.     

Le Fort I型截骨术定位平面的应用解剖学研究

目的：研究Le Fort I型截骨术与上颌牙根尖的关系,为临床合理制订截骨平面提供解剖学依据。方法：选择上颌牙槽清晰或出土后仍有牙保留的颅骨,在颅骨梨状孔下缘至上颌结节作一连线作为模拟Le Fort I型术式截骨水平,以上颌牙槽缘为标志,用游标卡尺测量每侧上颌各牙的牙槽缘至上述模拟截骨水平的距离及牙槽缘至各牙根尖端的长度,然后计算出上颌各牙根尖至Le Fort I型术式截骨线的距离。结果：上颌各牙相对的牙槽缘至Le FortI型术式截骨线的距离,从中切牙至第二磨牙逐渐缩小,右侧中切牙为21．09±1．53mm,左侧中切牙为20．96±1．64mm,右侧第二磨牙为14．94±1．52mm,左侧第二磨牙为14．95±1．59mm;上颌各牙根尖至Le Fort I型术式截骨水平的距离,从中切牙至第二磨牙也逐渐缩小,而两侧尖牙牙根尖距离Le Fort I型术式截骨线的距离右侧为4．49±1．74mm,左侧为4．69±2．14mm,第二磨牙牙根尖距离Le Fort I型术式截骨线的距离右侧为4．65±1．63mm,左侧为4．49±1．89,两侧尖牙牙根尖和第二磨牙牙根尖至Le Fort I型术式截骨水平的距离均比较接近。结论：上颌各牙根尖至LeFortI型术式截骨线的距离均在4mm以上,根据前牙中尖牙牙根尖的位置和后牙中第二磨牙牙根尖的位置,Le Fort I型术式截骨线水平在13、23（3｜3）根尖及27、27（7｜7）根尖上方4mm以上,按此平面作截骨水平较为安全,不易损伤牙根。     

The effect of an early Le Fort III surgery on permanent molar eruption

The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the extent to which an early Le Fort III osteotomy affects the position and eruption of the permanent maxillary first and second molars. To test the null hypothesis that there are no changes in eruption patterns, 31 patients diagnosed with craniosynostoses (13 with Crouzon's syndrome, nine with Apert's syndrome, eight with Pfeiffer's syndrome, and one with Carpenter's syndrome) with a mean age at the time of surgery of 5.3 +/- 1.3 years were studied. All patients underwent a Le Fort III osteotomy performed by a single surgeon to correct the anatomical deformity for functional and psychosocial reasons. Eighteen patients with craniosynostoses who had not been operated on (11 with Crouzon's syndrome, four with Apert's syndrome, and three with Pfeiffer's syndrome) served as controls; they had a mean age of 21.2 +/- 9.5 years. First and second molar positions and eruption patterns were assessed separately on panoramic radiographs by three observers. For the patients who underwent surgery, long-term evaluation showed that although 79 percent of all first molars erupted compared with 100 percent for the control group (p < 0.001), only 18 percent of all second permanent molars erupted compared with 89 percent for the control group (p < 0.0001). The authors conclude that in a significant minority of cases, early Le Fort III osteotomy affects first molar eruption, whereas the probability of second molar eruption is significantly decreased in the majority of cases. Therefore, Le Fort III osteotomy sites should be positioned distal to the second molar tooth buds. If this is not possible, patients, parents, and dental professionals should be made aware of these early postosteotomy sequelae so that later treatment planning can be enhanced.     

Long-term skeletal stability after maxillary advancement with distraction osteogenesis using a rigid external distraction device in cleft maxillary deformities

Rigid external distraction is a highly effective technique for correction of maxillary hypoplasia in patients with orofacial clefts. The clinical results after correction of sagittal maxillary deformities in both the adult and pediatric age groups have been stable. The purpose of this retrospective longitudinal cephalometric study was to review the long-term stability of the repositioned maxilla in cleft patients who underwent maxillary advancement with rigid external distraction. Between April 1, 1995, and April 1, 1999, 17 consecutive patients with cleft maxillary hypoplasia underwent maxillary advancement using rigid external distraction. There were 13 male patients and four female patients, with ages ranging from 5.2 to 23.6 years (mean, 12.6 years). After a modified complete high Le Fort I osteotomy and a latency period of 3 to 5 days, patients underwent maxillary advancement with rigid external distraction until proper facial convexity and dental overjet and overbite were obtained. After active distraction, a 3- to 4-week period of rigid retention was undertaken; this was followed by removable elastic retention for 6 to 8 weeks using, during sleep time, an orthodontic protraction face mask. Cephalometric radiographs were obtained preoperatively, after distraction, at 1 year after distraction, and 2 or more years after distraction. The mean follow-up was 3.3 years (minimum, 2.1 years; maximum, 5.3 years). The following measurements were obtained in each cephalogram: three linear horizontal and two linear vertical maxillary measurements, two angular craniomaxillary measurements, and one craniomandibular measurement. Differences between the preoperative and postoperative cephalometric values were analyzed by paired t tests (p < 0.05). The cephalometric analysis demonstrated postoperatively significant advancement of the maxilla. In addition, the mandibular plane angle opened 1.2 degrees after surgery. After the 1- to 3-year follow-up period, the maxilla was stable in the sagittal plane. Minimal anteroposterior growth was observed in the maxilla compared with that exhibited in the anterior cranial base. However, there was significant vertical maxillary growth over the 3-year observation period. The mandibular plane angle tended to decrease during the follow-up period. The cephalometric data from this study support the clinical impression of maxillary stability after maxillary advancement with rigid external distraction in cleft patients. This effective and stable technique is now considered for all pediatric patients with severe cleft maxillary hypoplasia and for adolescent and adult patients with moderate to severe deformities.     

Rotation advancement of the midface by distraction osteogenesis

A wide variety of disease processes produce alteration of midfacial skeletal growth, resulting in moderate-to-severe midface deficiency presenting as retrusion associated with Angle's class III malocclusion. Le Fort III osteotomies with advancement can provide an excellent tool for correction of this deformity. Recently, the corrective procedure of choice for advancement of midfacial segments has been distraction osteogenesis after osteotomy. Straight linear advancement is the most common choice for corrective movement of the midfacial segment, whether accomplished through acute surgical advancement or through the progressive distraction technique. Unfortunately, linear advancement can produce abnormal configurations, both at the nasal root and lateral orbits, regardless of the technique used. Enophthalmos, caused by orbital enlargement, may limit the advancement necessary to achieve class I occlusion.The authors have extended the utility of the Le Fort III procedure and have improved the final outcome by creating a controlled rotation advancement of the midfacial segment using distraction. The application of an existing internal distraction device is modified to control the movement of the midfacial segment in a rotation advancement path. Included in the series were 10 patients with severe midface retrusion secondary to multiple congenital syndromes, along with cleft lip and palate. The ages of the patients ranged from 6 to 14 years. An internal distraction system was used in all cases. Application of the distractor was substantially modified to simplify both fixation and removal and to produce controlled rotation advancement. The team orthodontist determined the final occlusal relationship. Percutaneous distractor drive rods were removed 4 to 6 weeks after active distraction to increase patient comfort. The distractors and all associated hardware were removed after 12 to 16 weeks of consolidation; follow-up periods ranged from 1 to 3 years.By using the modified distractor application to produce rotation advancement, the contour abnormalities at the nasal root and lateral orbit and the enophthalmos produced by linear advancement were eliminated. Significant improvement in facial contour and class I occlusion was obtained in all cases. Complications consisted of near exposure of the device in one patient. Stability has been excellent, with no relapse reported by the orthodontist.Rotational advancement of facial segments by distraction allows successful early intervention in patients with significant midface retrusion. The abnormal nasal root and lateral orbital configurations produced by direct linear advancement are avoided, and a stable and normalized facial configuration is produced.     

Immediate versus delayed midface distraction in a primate model using a new intraoral internal device

The theoretic advantage of distraction osteogenesis of the craniofacial skeleton, especially in cases of severe midface retrusion and in the presence of maxillary scarring, is prevention of relapse following significant advancements. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the utility of a new low-profile, intraoral, internal device for midface distraction at the conventional or high Le Fort I level. In addition, the present study compares the efficacy of immediate versus delayed distraction on subsequent maxillary relapse. Four adult rhesus Macaca mulatta monkeys were divided into two groups. Group 1 underwent immediate midface distraction; group 2 underwent delayed distraction. All four monkeys underwent a modified Le Fort I osteotomy through an upper buccal sulcus incision and bilateral application of the intraoral midface distraction devices. No other osteotomies or incisions were necessary. Immediate distraction, performed in group 1, entailed intraoperative activation of the devices and distraction of 10 mm followed by a 5-day lag period before postoperative activation and distraction of an additional 10 mm at the rate of 1 mm/day. Delayed distraction, performed in group 2, entailed a 5-day postoperative lag period before device activation and distraction of 20 mm at the rate of 1 mm/day. Both groups thus underwent 20 mm of midface distraction. All devices were removed 6 weeks after completion of distraction. All monkeys tolerated the devices and daily distraction uneventfully. On the basis of serial cephalograms and dental models obtained throughout the experimental period, there was no evidence of relapse in either the immediate or delayed groups 6 months after distraction. In addition, on the basis of histologic, ultrastructural, and dry skull analysis, no significant differences were observed in the quality of regenerate bone obtained when comparing the immediate and delayed distraction groups. Significant midface advancement is thus feasible using this new internal, intraoral distraction device, which presents several advantages over other internal devices that require coronal incisions and additional osteotomies to achieve midface advancement. In addition, immediate distraction may abbreviate the distraction period without adverse sequelae.     

The self-retained Le Fort I osteotomy

Because inferior repositioning of the maxilla after Le Fort I osteotomy has a high relapse rate, a modified bone cut oriented obliquely upward has been tried in 29 patients. The modification allows extrusion of the fragment while maintaining good bony contact, thus eliminating the need for bone grafts. It also permits self-retention of the fragment and can be adapted to movements in any plane.     

Definitive surgical correction of vertical maxillary deficiency

Inferior repositioning of the maxilla to correct vertical maxillary deficiency has been associated with variable degrees of instability and subsequent relapse. Resorption of bone-graft material has been incriminated as the primary cause of postoperative instability. This paper reports on nine patients who have undergone inferior maxillary repositioning resulting in no residual bone contact between the down-fractured maxilla and superior midface. Mean inferior maxillary repositioning was 6.2 mm. Osteotomy gaps were implanted with porous block hydroxyapatite (Interpore 200), and maxillae were rigidly fixed in position with miniplates. No postoperative intermaxillary fixation was utilized in any patient. Follow-up ranged from 11 to 28 months, with a mean of 19.6 months. Cephalometric analyses at follow-up revealed excellent stability of the repositioned maxillae, with a mean vertical relapse of 4.3 percent. No complications were associated with this procedure. The biomechanical rationale contributing to the success of this operative technique is discussed.     

Maxillary advancement for mandibular prognathism: indications and rationale

The surgical correction of mandibular prognathism has traditionally involved posterior repositioning of the mandibular body. This treatment approach corrects the skeletal disproportion at the expense of reducing facial skeletal volume and can unpredictably result in inadequately supported soft tissues with loss of skeletal definition. In an effort to avoid these sequelae of mandibular reduction, 18 patients diagnosed as having mandibular prognathism were treated with maxillary advancement surgery at the Le Fort I level. Mean patient SNB angle was 85.2 degrees, as compared with a normal 79 +/- 3 degrees. Maxillae were documented to be in normal position relative to both cranial base and Frankfort horizontal. The mean maxillary advancement was 6.9 mm, with a range of 4.5 to 8.8 mm. All patients required genioplasty to reduce vertical chin height and/or to laterally shift the chin. At the time of follow-up (mean 16.2 months), all patients retained cephalometric data suggestive of enlarged mandibles and excessive anterior facial divergence. However, maxillomandibular harmony and facial convexity had been restored without sacrificing skeletal volume. Treatment results demonstrated these faces to be skeletally well proportioned despite lower face protrusion that was beyond "normal." Postoperative appearances were characterized by a well-supported soft-tissue envelope and a highlighted skeletal foundation, creating angular, well-defined lower faces. These findings support the credibility of maxillary advancement as the procedure of choice in selected individuals with mandibular prognathism. Indications and an aesthetic rationale for this surgical approach are presented.     

Miniplate fixation of Le Fort I osteotomies

The use of rigid, internal, three-dimensional fixation using vitallium bone plates in 28 consecutive Le Fort I osteotomies is presented. A minimum follow-up period of 6 months was required for inclusion in this patient group. Maxillary movements included advancements (17), intrusions (9), lengthenings (5), and retrusions (2). The majority of maxillae were moved in more than one plane of space. Technical details, complications, and relapse potential are discussed. Advantages of rigid plate fixation include marked reductions in the length of intermaxillary fixation with light training elastics only. Immediate postoperative airway problems are thereby eliminated. Six months of follow-up would appear to indicate a low potential for osseous relapse when compared to wire osteosynthesis, regardless of the direction of maxillary movement. The major disadvantage is the decreased ability of postoperative orthodontics to move dento-osseous segments if skeletal occlusal disharmony persists postoperatively. For this reason, close attention to preoperative planning and operative technique is critical for the success of this fixation method.     

Craniofacial distraction with a modular internal distraction system: evolution of design and surgical techniques.

The present report summarizes the evolution of design for a modular internal distraction system that is applicable throughout the craniofacial region. Eleven patients (5 boys, 6 girls), whose ages ranged from 4 months to 10 years at the time of distraction, constitute the basis for this study. The clinical indications for distraction were exorbitism with corneal exposure (n = 1), obstructive sleep apnea (n = 4), tracheostomy decannulation (n = 1), severe maxillary hypoplasia with class III malocclusion (n = 3), severe vertical and sagittal maxillary deficiency with anophthalmia (n = 1), and relapse following frontoorbital advancement in a case of rare craniofacial clefting (n = 1). Twenty-two distraction devices were used in these 11 patients. Two initial prototypes were tested (prototype 1 = 8 devices; prototype 2 = 2 devices) until the modular internal distraction system (MIDS, Howmedica-Leibinger, Inc.) was developed (n = 12 devices). The craniofacial osteotomies used were Le Fort III (n = 4), monobloc (n = 3), mandibular (n = 3), Le Fort I (n = 2), and cranial (n = 1). The distraction distances ranged from 11 to 28 mm. One patient undergoing mandibular distraction developed transient swelling in the left mandibular region, which responded to antibiotics. There were no other complications. Depending on the age of the patient and the length of distraction, the distraction gap was allowed to consolidate from 6 weeks to 3 months. The devices were then removed on either an outpatient or a 23-hour-stay basis. The modular internal distraction system permits widespread application of easily customizable, buried distraction devices throughout the craniofacial region.     

Le Fort fractures without mobility

The Le Fort fracture without maxillary mobility constitutes 9 percent of maxillary fractures observed over a 3-year period. A high Le Fort (level II or III) injury exists as a one- or two-piece incomplete fracture. The degree of fracture is insufficient to permit mobility of the maxillary alveolus. Frequently, an obvious unilateral zygomatic fracture is present. Physical findings consist of bilateral eyelid ecchymosis and malocclusion. The occlusal disturbance may consist of either crossbite, open bite, maxillary rotation, or lack of proper dental intercuspation. On CT scan, fractures are best demonstrated in the posterior and medial maxillary walls at the Le Fort I level; they are most obvious unilaterally with contralateral fractures that may be subtle. Bilateral maxillary sinus fluid is consistently present on CT. Treatment usually consists of observation and traction elastics but may require mobilization of the fragments followed by open reduction and rigid fixation.     

Dual midfacial distraction osteogenesis: Le Fort III minus I and Le Fort I for syndromic craniosynostosis

Midfacial hypoplasia has been corrected by Le Fort III or monobloc forward advancement in one stage in syndromic craniosynostosis, but recently developed distraction osteogenesis has been in use. Whereas the amount of forward mobilization in Le Fort III conventional osteotomy is determined by the preplanned fabricated interdental splint, that in Le Fort III distraction is determined by the positions of the inferior orbital rim, malar complex, and nose. Therefore, the forward mobilization of the upper part of the midface may sometimes be insufficient when one focuses on the final occlusion, and the occlusion might not be satisfied when the forward mobilization is sufficient. Correction of the midfacial hypoplasia should be considered differently in the upper and lower portions of the midface. The upper portion contains the inferior orbit and nose, and the lower portion contains the occlusal structure of the maxillary dentoalveolar portion with the mandible. Separating the midface into two portions and conducting the distraction osteogenesis in both portions separately in different amounts and vectors of distraction is described in this article. Although distraction of the upper portion of the midface can be conducted in one direction with an internal device, distraction of the lower portion of the midface is preferred for conduction by a controllable device because of the need to obtain the preferred occlusion. To obtain better functional and aesthetic results in midfacial distraction in adults and adolescents with syndromic craniosynostosis, dual Le Fort III minus I and Le Fort I midfacial distraction osteogenesis was performed in four cases (in two patients with Crouzon syndrome and in two patients with Apert syndrome). Two females and two males are described (age range, 13 to 26 years). An internal device was used for the upper portion of the midface and an external device was used for the lower portion. The amount of distraction ranged from 14 to 21 mm in the upper portion of the midface and from 11 to 18 mm in the lower portion. No particular complications were noticed over a follow-up period of 10 to 38 months (average follow-up, 19.8 months).     

Midface position after LeFort III advancement

Nineteen of 30 patients who had midface advancement procedures between 1972 and 1980 had sufficient cephalometric data to be included in this retrospective study. The position of the midface in relation to the cranium and mandible was evaluated immediately postoperatively and for a period of 2 to 11 years (mean 5.8 years). At 1 year, midface position after LeFort III advancement was stable in 12 of 19 patients. Of these 12 patients, 8 showed some evidence of downward and/or forward movement of the midface. The remaining 7 patients showed a minor degree of midface relapse in the first year of follow-up. In 15 of 19 patients, at 2 years or more postoperatively, the final position of the midface was either at, anterior to, or inferior to its immediate postoperative location. Correction of exorbitism remained stable in all but one patient, who required a second advancement of the orbital segment. Three patients required subsequent LeFort I osteotomy to correct class III occlusion. Prognathism was determined to be secondary to mandibular growth, not midface relapse.