Energetics of quinone-dependent electron and proton transfers in Rhodobacter sphaeroides photosynthetic reaction centers

Proteins bind redox cofactors, modifying their electrochemistry and affinity by specific interactions of the binding site with each cofactor redox state. Photosynthetic reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides have three ubiquinone-binding sites, Q(A), and proximal and distal Q(B) sites. Ubiquinones, which can be doubly reduced and bind 2 protons, have 9 redox states. However, only Q and Q(-) are seen in the Q(A) site and Q, Q(-), and QH(2) in the proximal Q(B) site. The distal Q(B) function is uncertain. Multiple conformation continuum electrostatics (MCCE) was used to compare the ubiquinone electrochemical midpoints (E(m)) and pK(a) values at these three sites. At pH 7, the Q(A)/Q(A)(-) E(m) is -40 mV and proximal Q(B)/Q(B)(-) -10 mV in agreement with the experimental values (assuming a solution ubiquinone E(m) of -145 mV). Q(B) reduction requires changes in nearby residue protonation and SerL223 reorientation. The distal Q(B)/Q(B)(-) E(m) is a much more unfavorable -260 mV. Q(A) and proximal Q(B) sites generally stabilize species with a -1 charge, while the distal Q(B) site prefers binding neutral species. In each site, the dianion is destabilized because favorable interactions with the residues and backbone increase with charge (q), while the unfavorable loss of solvation energy increases with q(2). Therefore, proton binding before a second reduction, forming QH and then QH(-), is always preferred to forming the dianion (Q(-)(2)). The final product QH(2) is higher in energy at the proximal Q(B) site than in solution; therefore, it binds poorly, favoring release. In contrast, QH(2) binds more tightly than Q at the distal Q(B) site.     

Simulating proton translocations in proteins: probing proton transfer pathways in the Rhodobacter sphaeroides reaction center.

A general method for simulating proton translocations in proteins and for exploring the role of different proton transfer pathways is developed and examined. The method evaluates the rate constants for proton transfer processes using the energetics of the relevant proton configurations. The energies (DeltaG((m))) of the different protonation states are evaluated in two steps. First, the semimicroscopic version of the protein dipole Langevin dipole (PDLD/S) method is used to evaluate the intrinsic energy of bringing the protons to their protein sites, when the charges of all protein ionized residues are set to zero. Second, the interactions between the charged groups are evaluated by using a Coulomb's Law with an effective dielectric constant. This approach, which was introduced in an earlier study by one of the authors of the current report, allows for a very fast determination of any DeltaG((m)) and for practical evaluation of the time-dependent proton population: That is, the rate constants for proton transfer processes are evaluated by using the corresponding DeltaG((m)) values and a Marcus type relationship. These rate constants are then used to construct a master equation, the integration of which by a fourth-order Runge-Kutta method yields the proton population as a function of time. The integration evaluates, 'on the fly,' the changes of the rate constants as a result of the time-dependent changes in charge-charge interaction, and this feature benefits from the fast determination of DeltaG((m)). The method is demonstrated in a preliminary study of proton translocation processes in the reaction center of Rhodobacter sphaeroides. It is found that proton transfer across water chains involves significant activation barriers and that ionized protein residues probably are involved in the proton transfer pathways. The potential of the present method in analyzing mutation experiments is discussed briefly and illustrated. The present study also examines different views of the nature of proton translocations in proteins. It is shown that such processes are controlled mainly by the electrostatic interaction between the proton site and its surroundings rather than by the local bond rearrangements of water molecules that are involved in the proton pathways. Thus, the overall rate of proton transport frequently is controlled by the highest barrier along the conduction pathway. Proteins 1999;36:484-500.     

Energetics of proton transfer pathways in reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides. The Glu-H173 activated mutants

Electron transfer between the primary and secondary quinones (Q(A), Q(B)) in the bacterial photosynthetic reaction center (bRC) is coupled with proton uptake at Q(B). The protons are conducted from the cytoplasmic side, probably with the participation of two water channels. Mutations of titratable residues like Asp-L213 to Asn (inhibited mutant) or the double mutant Glu-L212 to Ala/Asp-L213 to Ala inhibit these electron transfer-coupled proton uptake events. The inhibition of the proton transfer (PT) process in the single mutant can be restored by a second mutation of Arg-M233 to Cys or Arg-H177 to His (revertant mutant). These revertant mutants shed light on the location of the main proton transfer pathway of wild type bRC. In contrast to the wild type and inhibited mutant bRC, the revertant mutant bRC showed notable proton uptake at Glu-H173 upon formation of the Q(B)- state. In all of these mutants, the pK(a) of Asp-M17 decreased by 1.4-2.4 units with respect to the wild type bRC, whereas a significant pK(a) upshift of up to 5.8 units was observed at Glu-H122, Asp-H170, Glu-H173, and Glu-H230 in the revertant mutants. These residues belonging to the main PT pathway are arranged along water channel P1 localized mainly in subunit H. bRC possesses subunit H, which has no counterpart in photosystem II. Thus, bRC may possess alternative PT pathways involving water channels in subunit H, which becomes active in case the main PT pathway is blocked.     

B-branch electron transfer in reaction centers of Rhodobacter sphaeroides assessed with site-directed mutagenesis

Mutants of Rhodobacter (Rba.) sphaeroides are described which were designed to study electron transfer along the so-called B-branch of reaction center (RC) cofactors. Combining the mutation L(M214)H, which results in the incorporation of a bacteriochlorophyll, β, for H_A [Kirmaier et al. (1991) Science 251: 922–927] with two mutations, G(M203)D and Y(M210)W, near B_A, we have created a double and a triple mutant with long lifetimes of the excited state P^* of the primary donor P, viz. 80 and 160 ps at room temperature, respectively. The yield of P⁺Q_A ⁻ formation in these mutants is reduced to 50 and 30%, respectively, of that in wildtype RCs. For both mutants, the quantum yield of P⁺H_B ⁻ formation was less than 10%, in contrast to the 15% B-branch electron transfer demonstrated in RCs of a similar mutant of Rba. capsulatus with a P^* lifetime of 15 ps [Heller et al. (1995) Science 269: 940–945]. We conclude that the lifetime of P^* is not a governing factor in switching to B-branch electron transfer. The direct photoreduction of the secondary quinone, Q_B, was studied with a triple mutant combining the G(M203)D, L(M214)H and A(M260)W mutations. In this triple mutant Q_A does not bind to the reaction center [Ridge et al. (1999) Photosynth Res 59: 9–26]. It is shown that B-branch electron transfer leading to P⁺Q_B ⁻ formation occurs to a minor extent at both room temperature and at cryogenic temperatures (about 3% following a saturating laser flash at 20 K). In contrast, in wildtype RCs P⁺Q_B ⁻ formation involves the A-branch and does not occur at all at cryogenic temperatures. Attempts to accumulate the P⁺Q_B ⁻ state under continuous illumination were not successful. Charge recombination of P⁺Q_B ⁻ formed by B-branch electron transfer in the new mutant is much faster (seconds) than has been previously reported for charge recombination of P⁺Q_B ⁻ trapped in wildtype RCs (10⁵ s) [Kleinfeld et al. (1984b) Biochemistry 23: 5780–5786]. This difference is discussed in light of the different binding sites for Q_B and Q_B ⁻ that recently have been found by X-ray crystallography at cryogenic temperatures [Stowell et al. (1997) Science 276: 812–816]. We present the first low-temperature absorption difference spectrum due to P⁺Q_B ⁻. This revised version was published online in June 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Primary electron transfer in Rhodobacter sphaeroides R-26 reaction centers under dehydration conditions

The photoinduced charge separation in Q_B-depleted reaction centers (RCs) from Rhodobacter sphaeroides R-26 in solid air-dried and vacuum-dried (~10⁻² Torr) films, obtained in the presence of detergent n-dodecyl-β-D-maltoside (DM), is characterized using ultrafast transient absorption spectroscopy. It is shown that drying of RC-DM complexes is accompanied by reversible blue shifts of the ground-state absorption bands of the pigment ensemble, which suggest that no dehydration-induced structural destruction of RCs occurs in both types of films. In air-dried films, electron transfer from the excited primary electron donor P^⁎ to the photoactive bacteriopheophytin H_A proceeds in 4.7 ps to form the P⁺H_A⁻ state with essentially 100% yield. P⁺H_A⁻ decays in 260 ps both by electron transfer to the primary quinone Q_A to give the state P⁺Q_A⁻ (87% yield) and by charge recombination to the ground state (13% yield). In vacuum-dried films, P^⁎ decay is characterized by two kinetic components with time constants of 4.1 and 46 ps in a proportion of ~55%/45%, and P⁺H_A⁻ decays about 2-fold slower (462 ps) than in air-dried films. Deactivation of both P^⁎ and P⁺H_A⁻ to the ground state effectively competes with the corresponding forward electron-transfer reactions in vacuum-dried RCs, reducing the yield of P⁺Q_A⁻ to 68%. The results are compared with the data obtained for fully hydrated RCs in solution and are discussed in terms of the presence in the RC complexes of different water molecules, the removal/displacement of which affects spectral properties of pigment cofactors and rates and yields of the electron-transfer reactions.     

Long-lived charge-separated states in bacterial reaction centers isolated from Rhodobacter sphaeroides

We studied the accumulation of long-lived charge-separated states in reaction centers isolated from Rhodobacter sphaeroides, using continuous illumination, or trains of single-turnover flashes. We found that under both conditions a long-lived state was produced with a quantum yield of about 1%. This long-lived species resembles the normal P(+)Q(-) state in all respects, but has a lifetime of several minutes. Under continuous illumination the long-lived state can be accumulated, leading to close to full conversion of the reaction centers into this state. The lifetime of this accumulated state varies from a few minutes up to more than 20 min, and depends on the illumination history. Surprisingly, the lifetime and quantum yield do not depend on the presence of the secondary quinone, Q(B). Under oxygen-free conditions the accumulation was reversible, no changes in the normal recombination times were observed due to the intense illumination. The long-lived state is responsible for most of the dark adaptation and hysteresis effects observed in room temperature experiments. A simple method for quinone extraction and reconstitution was developed.     

Inhibition and labelling of isolated reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides by dicyclohexylcarbodiimide

The effect of dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCCD) on electron transfer in the acceptor quinone complex of reaction centers (RC) from Rhodobacter sphaeroides is reported. DCCD covalently labelled the RC over a wide concentration range. At low concentrations (<10 M) the binding was specific for the L subunit. At relatively high concentrations (>100 M) DCCD accelerated the rate of charge recombination of the P⁺Q_B ^- state, consistent with a decrease in the equilibrium constant between Q_A ^-Q_B and Q_AQ_B ^-. At similar concentrations, in the presence of cytochrome c as exogenous donor, turnover of the RC was inhibited such that only three cytochromes were oxidized in a train of flashes. Both these inhibitory effects were fully reversed by dialysis, indicating that stable covalent binding was not involved. Possible mechanisms of action are discussed in terms of the putative role of specific residues in proton transfer and protonation and release of quinol from the RC.     

Formation of a semiquinone at the QB site by A- or B-branch electron transfer in the reaction center from Rhodobacter sphaeroides

In Rhodobacter sphaeroides reaction centers containing the mutation Ala M260 to Trp (AM260W), transmembrane electron transfer along the A-branch of cofactors is prevented by the loss of the QA ubiquinone. Reaction centers that contain this AM260W mutation are proposed to photoaccumulate the P(+)QB- radical pair following transmembrane electron transfer along the B-branch of cofactors (Wakeham, M. C., Goodwin, M. G., McKibbin, C., and Jones, M. R. (2003) Photoaccumulation of the P(+)QB- radical pair state in purple bacterial reaction centers that lack the QA ubiquinone. FEBS Lett. 540, 234-240). The yield of the P(+)QB- state appears to depend upon which additional mutations are present. In the present paper, Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) difference spectroscopy was used to demonstrate that photooxidation of the reaction center's primary donor in QA-deficient reaction centers results in formation of a semiquinone at the QB site by B-branch electron transfer. Reduction of QB by the B-branch pathway still occurs at 100 K, with a yield of approximately 10% relative to that at room temperature, in contrast to the QA- to QB reaction in the wild-type reaction center, which is not active at cryogenic temperatures. These FTIR results suggest that the conformational changes that "gate" the QA- to QB reaction do not necessarily have the same influence on QB reduction when the electron donor is the HB anion, at least in a minority of reaction centers.     

Trapped conformational states of semiquinone (D+*QB-*) formed by B-branch electron transfer at low temperature in Rhodobacter sphaeroides reaction centers

The reaction center (RC) from Rhodobacter sphaeroides captures light energy by electron transfer between quinones QA and QB, involving a conformational gating step. In this work, conformational states of D+*QB-* were trapped (80 K) and studied using EPR spectroscopy in native and mutant RCs that lack QA in which QB was reduced by the bacteriopheophytin along the B-branch. In mutant RCs frozen in the dark, a light induced EPR signal due to D+*QB-* formed in 30% of the sample with low quantum yield (0.2%-20%) and decayed in 6 s. A small signal with similar characteristics was also observed in native RCs. In contrast, the EPR signal due to D+*QB-* in mutant RCs illuminated while freezing formed in approximately 95% of the sample did not decay (tau >107 s) at 80 K (also observed in the native RC). In all samples, the observed g-values were the same (g = 2.0026), indicating that all active QB-*'s were located in a proximal conformation coupled with the nonheme Fe2+. We propose that before electron transfer at 80 K, the majority (approximately 70%) of QB, structurally located in the distal site, was not stably reducible, whereas the minority (approximately 30%) of active configurations was in the proximal site. The large difference in the lifetimes of the unrelaxed and relaxed D+*QB-* states is attributed to the relaxation of protein residues and internal water molecules that stabilize D+*QB-*. These results demonstrate energetically significant conformational changes involved in stabilizing the D+*QB-* state. The unrelaxed and relaxed states can be considered to be the initial and final states along the reaction coordinate for conformationally gated electron transfer.     

Small weak acids reactivate proton transfer in reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides mutated at AspL210 and AspM17

In reaction centers of Rhodobacter sphaeroides, site-directed mutagenesis has implicated several acidic residues in the delivery of protons to the secondary quinone (Q(B)) during reduction to quinol. In a double mutant (Asp(L210) --> Asn + Asp(M17) --> Asn) that is severely impaired in proton transfer capability over a wide pH range, proton transfer was "rescued" by added weak acids. For low pK(a) acids the total concentration of salt required near neutral pH was high. The ionic strength effect of added salts stimulated the rate of proton-coupled electron transfer at pH < 7, but decreased it at pH > 7.5, indicating an effective isoelectric point between these limits. In this region, a substantial rate enhancement by weak acids was clearly evident. A Br?nsted plot of activity versus pK(a) of the rescuing acids was linear, with a slope of -1, and extrapolated to a diffusion-limited rate at pK(a)(app) approximately 1. However, the maximum rate at saturating concentrations of acid did not correlate with pK(a), indicating that the acid and anion species compete for binding, both with weak affinity. This model predicts that pK(a)(app) corresponds to a true pK(a) = 4-5, similar to that for a carboxylic acid or Q(B)(-), itself. Only rather small, neutral acids were active, indicating a need to access a small internal volume, suggested to be a proton channel to the Q(B) domain. However, the on-rates were near the diffusion limit. The implications for intraprotein proton transfer pathway design are discussed.     

Temperature dependence of electron transfer between bacteriopheophytin and ubiquinone in protonated and deuterated reaction centers of Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides.

The rate of the electron-transfer reaction between bacteriopheophytin and the first quinone in isolated reaction centers of Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides has an unusual temperature dependence. The rate increases about threefold with decreasing temperature between 300 and 25 K, and decreases abruptly at temperatures below 25 K. Partial deuteration of the reaction centers alters the temperature dependence of the rate constant. Qualitative features of the temperature dependence can be understood in the context of a theory of nonadiabatic electron transfer (Sarai, 1980. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 589:71-83). We conclude that very low-energy (10-50 cm-1) processes, perhaps skeletal vibrations of the protein, are important to electron transfer. Higher-energy vibrations, possibly involving the pyrrolic N--H bonds of bacteriopheophytin, also are important in this process.     

On the efficiency of energy transfer and the different pathways of electron transfer in mutant reaction centers of Rhodobacter sphaeroides

The efficiency of energy transfer from the monomeric pigments to the primary donor was determined from 77 K steady-state fluorescence excitation spectra of three mutant reaction centers, YM210L, YM210F and LM160H / FM197H. For all three reaction centers this efficiency was not 100% and ranged between 55 and 70%. For the YM210L mutant it was shown using pump-probe spectroscopy with B band excitation at 798 nm that the excitations which are not transferred to P give rise to efficient charge separation. The results can be interpreted with a model in which excitation of the B absorbance band leads to direct formation of the radical pair state B_A ⁺H _A ^– in addition to energy transfer to P. It is also possible that some P⁺B_A ^– is formed from B^*. In previous publications we have demonstrated the operation of such alternative pathways for transmembrane electron transfer in a YM210W mutant reaction center [van Brederode et al. (1996) The Reaction center of Photosynthetic Bacteria, pp 225–238; (1997a,b) Chem Phys Lett 268: 143–149; Biochemistry 36: 6855–6861]. The results presented here demonstrate that these alternative mechanisms are not peculiar to the YM210W reaction center.     

Absence of a bicarbonate-depletion effect in electron transfer between quinones in chromatophores and reaction centers of Rhodobacter sphaeroides

Higher plants, algae, and cyanobacteria are known to require bicarbonate ions for electron flow from the first stable electron acceptor quinone QA to the second electron acceptor quinone QB, and to the intersystem quinone pool. It has been suggested that in Photosystem II of oxygenic photosynthesis, bicarbonate ion functions to maintain the reaction center in a proper conformation and, perhaps, to provide the protons needed to stabilize the semiquinone (QB-). In this paper, we show that bicarbonate ions do not influence the electron flow, from the quinone QA to QB and beyond, in the photosynthetic bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides. No measurable effect of bicarbonate depletion, obtained by competition with formate, was observed on cytochrome b-561 reduction in chromatophores; on the flash-dependent oscillation of semiquinone formation in reaction centers; on electron transfer from QA- to QB; or on either the fast or slow recovery of the oxidized primary donor (P+) which reflects the P+QA- ----PQA or the P+QB- ----PQB reaction. The lack of an observed effect in Rhodobacter sphaeroides in contrast to the effect seen in Photosystem II is suggested to be due to the amino-acid sequence differences between the reaction centers of the two systems.     

Effects of mutations near the bacteriochlorophylls in reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides.

Mutations were made in four residues near the bacteriochlorophyll cofactors of the photosynthetic reaction center from Rhodobacter sphaeroides. These mutations, L131 Leu to His and M160 Leu to His, near the dimer bacteriochlorophylls, and M203 Gly to Asp and L177 Ile to Asp, near the monomer bacteriochlorophylls, were designed to result in the placement of a hydrogen bond donor group near the ring V keto carbonyl of each bacteriochlorophyll. Perturbations of the electronic structures of the bacteriochlorophylls in the mutants are indicated by additional resolved transitions in the bacteriochlorophyll absorption bands in steady-state low-temperature and time-resolved room temperature spectra in three of the resulting mutant reaction centers. The major effect of the two mutations near the dimer was an increase up to 80 mV in the donor oxidation-reduction midpoint potential. Correspondingly, the calculated free energy difference between the excited state of the primary donor and the initial charge separated state decreased by up to 55 mV, the initial forward electron-transfer rate was up to 4 times slower, and the rate of charge recombination between the primary quinone and the donor was approximately 30% faster in these two mutants compared to the wild type. The two mutations near the monomer bacteriochlorophylls had minor changes of 25 mV or less in the donor oxidation-reduction potential, but the mutation close to the monomer bacteriochlorophyll on the active branch resulted in a roughly 3-fold decrease in the rate of the initial electron transfer.     

Theoretical studies on the mechanism of primary electron transfer in the photosynthetic reaction center of Rhodobacter sphaeroides

The mechanism of the primary electron transfer (ET) process in the photosynthetic reaction center (PRC) of Rhodobacter sphaeroides has been studied with quantum chemistry method of ab initio density functional theory (DFT) (B3LYP/6-31G) based on the optimized X-ray crystallographic structure. The calculation was carried out on different structural levels. The electronic structure of pigment molecules was first studied, and then the influence of the neighboring protein was taken into account at three approximation levels: (a) the surrounding proteins were treated as a homogeneous medium with a uniform dielectric constant (SCRF); (b) both the influence of axial coordination of His to the special pair P and ABChl as, and the hydrogen bonds between related residues and P and also BPhas were included; and (c) the influence of the electronic structure of the protein subunit chains as a whole was studied. The results suggest that: (1) according to the composition of the HOMO and LUMO of P, there might be a charge-separated state of (BChl_L ⁺BChl_M ⁻) for the excited state of P; (2) to treat the protein surroundings as a homogeneous medium is not sufficient. Different interactions between pigment molecules and related residues play different roles in the ET process; (3) the axial coordination of His to P raises the E _LUMO of P greatly, and it is very important for the ET process to occur in the PRC of wild-type bacterium; the axial coordination of His to ABChl as also raises their E _LUMO significantly; (4) the hydrogen-bonds between amino acid residues and P and also BPh as depress the E _LUMO of the pigment molecules to some extent, which makes the E _LUMO of P lower than those of ABChlas, and the E _LUMO of BPh a _L lower than that of BPh a _M. Consequently, the ET process from P to BPh a _L does not, according to our calculation model, occur via ABChl a _L. The possibility of the ET pathway from P to BPh a _L via ABChl a _L was discussed; (5) the frontier orbitals of protein subunit chains L and M are localized at the random coil area and the α–helix areas, respectively. Results mentioned above support the fact that the ET process proceeds in favourable circumstances along the branch L. This revised version was published online in June 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Electron transfer in reaction centers of Rhodobacter sphaeroides and Rhodobacter capsulatus monitored by fluorescence of the bacteriochlorophyll dimer

Spectral and kinetic characteristics of fluorescence from isolated reaction centers of photosynthetic purple bacteria Rhodobacter sphaeroides and Rhodobacter capsulatus were measured at room temperature under rectangular shape of excitation at 810 nm. The kinetics of fluorescence at 915 nm reflected redox changes due to light and dark reactions in the donor and acceptor quinone complex of the reaction center as identified by absorption changes at 865 nm (bacteriochlorophyll dimer) and 450 nm (quinones) measured simultaneously with the fluorescence. Based on redox titration and gradual bleaching of the dimer, the yield of fluorescence from reaction centers could be separated into a time-dependent (originating from the dimer) and a constant part (coming from contaminating pigment (detached bacteriochlorin)). The origin was also confirmed by the corresponding excitation spectra of the 915 nm fluorescence. The ratio of yields of constant fluorescence over variable fluorescence was much smaller in Rhodobacter sphaeroides (0.15±0.1) than in Rhodobacter capsulatus (1.2±0.3). It was shown that the changes in fluorescence yield reflected the disappearance of the dimer and the quenching by the oxidized primary quinone. The redox changes of the secondary quinone did not have any influence on the yield but excess quinone in the solution quenched the (constant part of) fluorescence. The relative yields of fluorescence in different redox states of the reaction center were tabulated. The fluorescence of the dimer can be used as an effective tool in studies of redox reactions in reaction centers, an alternative to the measurements of absorption kinetics.Abbreviations Bchl bacteriochlorophyll - Bpheo bacteriopheophytin - D electron donor to P⁺ - P bacteriochlorophyll dimer - Q quinone acceptor - Q_A primary quinone acceptor - Q_B secondary quinone acceptor - RC reaction center protein - UQ₆ ubiquinone-30     

Kinetics of electron transfer between the primary and the secondary electron acceptor in reaction centers from Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides.

Photoreduction of the two ubiquinone molecules, UQ1 and UQ2, bound to purified reaction center from Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides induces different absorption band shifts of bacteriochlorophyll and bacteriopheophytin molecules depending on which ubiquinone is photoreduced. This allows us to study electron transfer between UQ1 and UQ2 directly by absorption spectrometry. The results support a model in which electrons are transferred one by one from UQ1 to UQ2 with a half-time 200 micro seconds, and two by two from fully reduced UQ2 to the secondary acceptor pool.     

Simultaneous replacement of Asp-L210 and Asp-M17 with Asn increases proton uptake by Glu-L212 upon first electron transfer to QB in reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides.

In the photosynthetic reaction center (RC) from Rhodobacter sphaeroides, the first electron transfer to the secondary quinone acceptor Q(B) is coupled to the protonation of Glu-L212, located approximately 5 A from the center of Q(B). Upon the second electron transfer to Q(B), Glu-L212 is involved in fast proton delivery to the reduced Q(B). Since Asp-L210 and Asp-M17 play an important role in the proton transfer to the Q(B) site [Paddock, M. L., Adelroth, P., Chang, C., Abresch, E. C., Feher, G., and Okamura, M. Y. (2001) Biochemistry 40, 6893-6902], we investigated the effects of replacing one or both Asp residues with Asn on proton uptake by Glu-L212 using FTIR difference spectroscopy. Upon the first electron transfer to Q(B), the amplitude of the proton uptake by Glu-L212 at pH 8 is increased in the single and double mutant RCs, as is evident from the larger intensity (by 35-55%) of the carboxylic acid band at 1727 cm(-1) in the Q(B)(-)/Q(B) difference spectra of mutant RCs, compared to that at 1728 cm(-1) in native RCs. This implies that the extent of ionization of Glu-L212 in the Q(B) ground state is greater in the mutants than in native RCs and that Asp-M17 and Asp-L210 are at least partially ionized near neutral pH in native RCs. In addition, no changes in the protonation state or the environment of these two residues are detected upon Q(B) reduction. The absence of the 1727 cm(-1) signal in all of the RCs lacking Glu-L212, confirms that the positive band at 1728-1727 cm(-1) probes the protonation of Glu-L212 in native and mutant RCs.     

Resistance of reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides against UV-B radiation. Effects on protein structure and electron transport

Inhibition of electron transport and damage to the protein subunits by ultraviolet-B (UV-B, 280–320 nm) radiation have been studied in isolated reaction centers of the non-sulfur purple bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides R26. UV-B irradiation results in the inhibition of charge separation as detected by the loss of the initial amplitude of absorbance change at 430 nm reflecting the formation of the P⁺(Q_AQ_B)^– state. In addition to this effect, the charge recombination accelerates and the damping of the semiquinone oscillation increases in the UV-B irradiated reaction centers. A further effect of UV-B is a 2 fold increase in the half- inhibitory concentration of o-phenanthroline. Some damage to the protein subunits of the RC is also observed as a consequence of UV-B irradiation. This effect is manifested as loss of the L, M and H subunits on Coomassie stained gels, but not accompanied with specific degradation products. The damaging effects of UV-B radiation enhanced in reaction centers where the quinone was semireduced (Q_B ^–) during UV-B irradiation, but decreased in reaction centers which lacked quinone at the Q_B binding site. In comparison with Photosystem II of green plant photosynthesis, the bacterial reaction center shows about 40 times lower sensitivity to UV-B radiation concerning the activity loss and 10 times lower sensitivity concerning the extent of reaction center protein damage. It is concluded that the main effect of UV-B radiation in the purple bacterial reaction center occurs at the Q_AQ_B quinone acceptor complex by decreasing the binding affinity of Q_B and shifting the electron equilibration from Q_AQ_B ^– to Q_A ^–Q_B. The inhibitory effect is likely to be caused by modification of the protein environment around the Q_B binding pocket and mediated by the semiquinone form of Q_B. The UV-resistance of the bacterial reaction center compared to Photosystem II indicates that either the Q_AQ_B acceptor complex, which is present in both types of reaction centers with similar structure and function, is much less susceptible to UV damage in purple bacteria, or, more likely, that Photosystem II contains UV-B targets which are more sensitive than its quinone complex.Abbreviations Bchl bacteriochlorophyll - P Bchl dimer - Q_A primary quinone electron acceptor - Q_B secondary quinone electron acceptor - RC reaction center - UV-B ultraviolet-B     

Reaction centers from three herbicide resistant mutants of Rhodobacter sphaeroides 2.4.1: Kinetics of electron transfer reactions

Electron transfer rates were measured in RCs from three herbicide-resistant mutants with known amino acid changes to elucidate the structural requirements for last electron transfer. The three herbicide resistant mutants were IM(L229) (Ile-L229 Met), SP(L223) (Ser-L223 Pro) and YG(L222) (Tyr-L222 Gly). The electron transfer rate D⁺Q_A ^-Q_BD⁺Q_AQ_B (k _AB) is slowed 3 fold in the IM(L229) and YG(L222) RCs (pH 8). The stabilization of D⁺Q_AQ_B ^- with respect to D⁺Q_AQ_B ^- (pH 8) was found to be eliminated in the IM(L229) mutant RCs (G⁰ 0 meV), was partially reduced in the SP(L223) mutant RCs (G⁰=–30 meV), and was unaltered in the YG(L222) mutant RCs (G⁰=–60 meV), compared to that observed in the native RCs (G⁰=–60 meV). The pH dependences of the charge recombination rate D⁺Q_AQ_B ^-DQ_AQ_B (k _BD) and the electron transfer from Q_A ^- (k _QA ^-Q_A) suggest that the mutations do not affect the protonation state of Glu-L212 nor the electrostatic interactions of Q_B and Q_B ^- with Glu-L212. The binding affinities of UQ₁₀ for the Q_B site were found in order of decreasing values to be native IM(L229) > YG(L222) SP(L223). The altered properties of the mutant RCs are used to deduce possible structural changes caused by the mutations and are dicscussed in terms of photosynthetic efficiency of the herbicide resistant strains.Abbreviations Bchl bacteriochlorophyll - Bphe bacteriopheophytin - cholate 3,7,12-trihydroxycholanic acid - D donor (bacteriochlorophyll dimer) - EDTA ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid - Fe²⁺ non-heme iron atom - LDAO lauryl dimethylamine oxide - PS II photosystem II - Q_A and Q_B primary and secondary quinone acceptors - RC bacterial reaction center - Tris tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane - UQ₀ 2,3-dimethoxy-5-methyl benzoquinone - UQ₁₀ ubiquinone 50