Arabidopsis late-flowering fve mutants are affected in both vegetative and reproductive development

The development of wild-type Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heyhn and two late-flowering fve mutants has been analysed under different environmental conditions. In wild-type plants, short-day photoperiods delay the floral transition as a consequence of lengthening all the developmental phases of the plant. Moreover, short days also alter the inflorescence structure by reducing the internode elongation and delaying the establishment of the floral developmental programme in the lateral meristems of the inflorescence and co-florescences. Mutations at the FVE locus cause a delay in flowering time, and a change in the inflorescence structure, similar to the effect of short photoperiods on wild-type plants. However, the effect of the fve mutations is additive to the effect of short days, and all the aspects of the Fve phenotype are corrected by vernalization. These results seem to indicate that FVE is not simply involved in timing the transition from vegetative to reproductive growth, but that it could play a role during all stages of plant development.     

<Emphasis Type="Italic">SINGLE FLOWER TRUSS</Emphasis> regulates the transition and maintenance of flowering in tomato

The characterisation of the single flower truss ( sft) mutant phenotype of tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.), as well as its genetic interactions with other mutations affecting FALSIFLORA ( FA) and SELF PRUNING ( SP) genes, has revealed that SFT is a key gene in the control of floral transition and floral meristem identity. The single sft mutation produces a late-flowering phenotype in both long-day and short-day conditions. In combination with fa, a mutation affecting the tomato gene orthologous to LFY, sft completely blocks the transition to flowering in this species. Thus, the phenotype of the sft fa double mutants indicates that SFT and FA participate in two parallel pathways that regulate the switch from vegetative to reproductive phase in tomato, and that both genes are indispensable for flowering. On the other hand, the replacement of flowers by vegetative shoots observed in the sft inflorescence suggests that SFT regulates flower meristem identity during inflorescence development of tomato. In addition to these two main functions, SFT is involved in the development of both flowers and sympodial shoots of tomato. First, the mutation produces a partial conversion of sepals into leaves in the first floral whorl, and a reduction in the number of floral organs, particularly carpels. Secondly, the sympodial development in the mutant plants is altered, which can be related to the interaction between SFT and SP, a gene controlling the number of nodes in sympodial shoots. In fact, we have found that the sft phenotype is epistatic to that of sp, and that the level of SP mRNA in the apical buds of sft around flowering is reduced. SFT can therefore co-ordinate the regulation of two simultaneous developmental processes in the tomato apical shoot, the promotion of flowering in one sympodial segment and the vegetative development of the next segment.     

The gentian orthologs of the FT/TFL1 gene family control floral initiation in Gentiana

Gentians are herbaceous perennials blooming in summer through autumn. Although they are popular ornamental flowers in Japan, the regulation of their timing of flowering has not been studied. We identified and characterized gentian orthologs of the Arabidopsis FT/TFL1 gene family to elucidate the mechanisms of flowering initiation. We isolated three gentian orthologs of FT and TFL1, denoted GtFT1, GtFT2 and GtTFL1. Since up-regulation of GtFT1 and GtFT2 as well as down-regulation of GtTFL1 promoted floral initiation in gentian plantlets, these genes affected floral initiation in a similar way to Arabidopsis FT and TFL1. The expression levels of GtFT1 and GtFT2 in leaves of late-flowering gentian increased prior to floral initiation, whereas GtTFL1 was highly expressed in shoot apical meristem at the vegetative stage and decreased drastically just before flowering initiation. Comparison of gene expression patterns showed that GtFT1 expression increased earlier in early-flowering than in late-flowering gentian, whereas the timing of the increase in GtFT2 expression was similar in early- and late-flowering plants. The GtTFL1 expression in early-flowering gentian was extremely low throughout the vegetative and reproductive stages. These results indicated that either the up-regulation of GtFT1 or the down-regulation of GtTFL1 may determine flowering time. Furthermore, we found that early-flowering but not late-flowering gentians have a 320 bp insertion in the promoter region of GtTFL1. Thus, the negligible expression of GtTFL1 in early-flowering lines may be due to this insertion, resulting in a shortened vegetative stage.     

The circadian clock‐associated gene gigantea1 affects maize developmental transitions

The circadian clock is an internal timing mechanism that allows plants to make developmental decisions in accordance with environmental conditions. In model plants, circadian clock‐associated gigantea (gi) genes are directly involved in control of growth and developmental transitions. The maize gigantea1 (gi1) gene is the more highly expressed of the two gi homeologs, and its function is uncharacterized. To understand the role of gi1 in the regulatory networks of the maize circadian clock system, gi1 mutants were evaluated for changes in flowering time, phase change and growth control. When grown in long‐day (LD) photoperiods, gi1 mutants flowered earlier than non‐mutant plants, but this difference was not apparent in short‐day (SD) photoperiods. Therefore, gi1 participates in a pathway that suppresses flowering in LD photoperiods, but not in SD. Part of the underlying cause of early flowering was up‐regulated expression of the FT‐like floral activator gene zea mays centroradialis8 (zcn8) and the CONSTANS‐like flowering regulatory gene constans of zea mays1 (conz1). gi1 mutants also underwent vegetative phase change earlier and grew taller than non‐mutant plants. These findings indicate gi1 has a repressive function in multiple regulatory pathways that govern maize growth and development.     

Nitrate regulates floral induction in <Emphasis Type="Italic">Arabidopsis</Emphasis>, acting independently of light,gibberellin and autonomous pathways

The transition from vegetative growth to reproduction is a major developmental event in plants. To maximise reproductive success, its timing is determined by complex interactions between environmental cues like the photoperiod, temperature and nutrient availability and internal genetic programs. While the photoperiod- and temperature- and gibberellic acid-signalling pathways have been subjected to extensive analysis, little is known about how nutrients regulate floral induction. This is partly because nutrient supply also has large effects on vegetative growth, making it difficult to distinguish primary and secondary influences on flowering. A growth system using glutamine supplementation was established to allow nitrate to be varied without a large effect on amino acid and protein levels, or the rate of growth. Under nitrate-limiting conditions, flowering was more rapid in neutral (12/12) or short (8/16) day conditions in C24, Col-0 and Laer. Low nitrate still accelerated flowering in late-flowering mutants impaired in the photoperiod, temperature, gibberellic acid and autonomous flowering pathways, in the fca co-2 ga1-3 triple mutant and in the ft-7 soc1-1 double mutant, showing that nitrate acts downstream of other known floral induction pathways. Several other abiotic stresses did not trigger flowering in fca co-2 ga1-3, suggesting that nitrate is not acting via general stress pathways. Low nitrate did not further accelerate flowering in long days (16/8) or in 35S::CO lines, and did override the late-flowering phenotype of 35S::FLC lines. We conclude that low nitrate induces flowering via a novel signalling pathway that acts downstream of, but interacts with, the known floral induction pathways.     

The flowering-time geneFT and regulation of flowering inArabidopsis

Transition from vegetative to reproductive development (flowering) is one of the most important decisions during the post-embryonic development of flowering plants. More than twenty loci are known to regulate this process inArabidopsis. Some of these flowering-time genes may act at the shoot apical meristem to regulate its competence to respond to floral inductive signals and floral evocation. Genetic and phenotypic analyses of mutants suggest that the late-flowering geneFT may be a good candidate for such genes. To test this, we have cloned theFT gene using aFT-deficiency line associated with a T-DNA insertion. Cloned genes and loss-of-function mutants in hand, it is now possible to analyse the role ofFT and other genes in flowering at the biochemical and cellular levels as well as at the genetic level. The deduced FT protein has homology with TFL1 and CEN proteins believed to be involved in regulation of inflorescence meristem identity. Phylogenetic analysis suggests that theFT group and theTFL1/CEN group of genes diverged before the diversification of major angiosperm clades. This raises the interesting question of the evolutionary relationship between the regulation of vegetative/reproductive switching in the shoot apical meristem and the regulation of inflorescence architecture in angiosperms. The extended abstract of a paper presented at the 13th International Symposium in Conjugation with Award of the International Prize for Biology “Fronitier of Plant Biology”     

delayed flowering1 Encodes a basic leucine zipper protein that mediates floral inductive signals at the shoot apex in maize

Separation of the life cycle of flowering plants into two distinct growth phases, vegetative and reproductive, is marked by the floral transition. The initial floral inductive signals are perceived in the leaves and transmitted to the shoot apex, where the vegetative shoot apical meristem is restructured into a reproductive meristem. In this study, we report cloning and characterization of the maize (Zea mays) flowering time gene delayed flowering1 (dlf1). Loss of dlf1 function results in late flowering, indicating dlf1 is required for timely promotion of the floral transition. dlf1 encodes a protein with a basic leucine zipper domain belonging to an evolutionarily conserved family. Three-dimensional protein modeling of a missense mutation within the basic domain suggests DLF1 protein functions through DNA binding. The spatial and temporal expression pattern of dlf1 indicates a threshold level of dlf1 is required in the shoot apex for proper timing of the floral transition. Double mutant analysis of dlf1 and indeterminate1 (id1), another late flowering mutation, places dlf1 downstream of id1 function and suggests dlf1 mediates floral inductive signals transmitted from leaves to the shoot apex. This study establishes an emergent framework for the genetic control of floral induction in maize and highlights the conserved topology of the floral transition network in flowering plants.     

Preliminary characterization of floral response of <Emphasis Type="Italic">Xerophyta humilis</Emphasis> to desiccation,vernalisation, photoperiod and light intensity

Xerophyta humilis is a monocotyledonous resurrection plant found in arid and semi-arid summer rainfall areas of Southern Africa, which undergoes desiccation to survive periods of extreme drought. In order for X. humilis to thrive in their natural habitat, correct timing of the floral transition, coincident with wet periods of sufficient duration, is essential. In this study, the environmental cues involved in the regulation of the floral transition in X. humilis were analysed. No single parameter tested was sufficient to induce flowering, but it was found that flowering was promoted by a combination of a cool period experienced while plants were hydrated, followed by transfer to long-day photoperiods of relatively high light intensity. Plants retained competence to flower if desiccated during exposure to cold, but no flowering occurred if dried prior to this exposure. These data suggest that exposure to cold temperature facilitates vernalisation and subsequent exposure to high light and long days are inductive for floral initiation in X. humilis.     

early in short days 4, a mutation in Arabidopsis that causes early flowering and reduces the mRNA abundance of the floral repressor FLC

The plant shoot is derived from the apical meristem, a group of stem cells formed during embryogenesis. Lateral organs form on the shoot of an adult plant from primordia that arise on the flanks of the shoot apical meristem. Environmental stimuli such as light, temperature and nutrient availability often influence the shape and identity of the organs that develop from these primordia. In particular, the transition from forming vegetative lateral organs to producing flowers often occurs in response to environmental cues. This transition requires increased expression in primordia of genes that confer floral identity, such as the Arabidopsis gene LEAFY. We describe a novel mutant, early in short days 4 (esd4), that dramatically accelerates the transition from vegetative growth to flowering in Arabidopsis: The effect of the mutation is strongest under short photoperiods, which delay flowering of Arabidopsis: The mutant has additional phenotypes, including premature termination of the shoot and an alteration of phyllotaxy along the stem, suggesting that ESD4 has a broader role in plant development. Genetic analysis indicates that ESD4 is most closely associated with the autonomous floral promotion pathway, one of the well-characterized pathways proposed to promote flowering of Arabidopsis: Furthermore, mRNA levels of a floral repressor (FLC), which acts within this pathway, are reduced by esd4, and the expression of flowering-time genes repressed by FLC is increased in the presence of the esd4 mutation. Although the reduction in FLC mRNA abundance is likely to contribute to the esd4 phenotype, our data suggest that esd4 also promotes flowering independently of FLC. The role of ESD4 in the regulation of flowering is discussed with reference to current models on the regulation of flowering in Arabidopsis.     

Mapping of a spontaneous mutation for early flowering time in maize highlights contrasting allelic series at two-linked QTL on chromosome 8

Only a few mutations affecting flowering time have been detected in maize. We analyzed a spontaneous early mutation, vgt-f7p, which appeared during production of the inbred line F7. This mutation shortens the time from planting to flowering by about 100 growing degree days (GDD), and reduces the number of nodes. It therefore seems to affect the timing of meristem differentiation from a vegetative to a reproductive state. It was mapped to a 6 cM confidence interval on chromosome 8, using a QTL mapping approach. QTL analysis of a mapping population generated by crossing the mutant F7 line (F7p) and the Gaspé flint population showed that vgt-f7p is probably allelic to vgt1, a QTL described in previous studies, and affects earliness more strongly than the Gaspé allele at vgt1. Global analysis of the QTL in the region suggested that there may be two consensus QTL, vgt1 and vgt2. These two QTL have contrasting allelic effects: rare alleles conferring extremely early flowering at vgt1 vs. greater diversity and milder effects at locus vgt2. Finally, detailed syntenic analysis showed that the vgt1 region displays a highly conserved duplicated region on chromosome 6, which also plays an important role in maize flowering time variation. The cloning of vgt1 should, therefore, also facilitate the analysis of the molecular basis of variation due to this second region.     

Inflorescence abnormalities occur with overexpression of Arabidopsis lyrata FT in the fwa mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana

Arabidopsis thaliana is a quantitative long-day plant with the timing of the floral transition being regulated by both endogenous signals and multiple environmental factors. fwa is a late-flowering mutant, and this phenotype is due to ectopic FWA expression caused by hypomethylation at the FWA locus. The floral transition results in the activation of the floral development process, the key regulators being the floral meristem identity genes, AP1 (APETALA1) and LFY (LEAFY). In this study, we describe inflorescence abnormalities in plants overexpressing the Arabidopsis lyrata FT (AlFT) and A. thaliana FWA (AtFWA) genes simultaneously. The inflorescence abnormality phenotype was present in only a proportion of plants. All plants overexpressing both AlFT and AtFWA flowered earlier than fwa, suggesting that the inflorescence abnormality and earlier flowering time are caused independently. The inflorescence abnormality phenotype was similar to that of the double mutant of ap1 and lfy, and AP1 and LFY genes were down-regulated in the abnormal inflorescences. From these results, we suggest that not only does ectopic AtFWA expression inhibit AtFT/AlFT function to delay flowering but that overexpression of AtFWA and AlFT together inhibits AP1 and LFY function to produce abnormal inflorescences.     

Analysis of Flowering Time Control in Arabidopsis by Comparison of Double and Triple Mutants

Three genetic pathways promote flowering of Arabidopsis under long photoperiods. These pathways are represented by the genes CO, FCA, and GA1, which act in the long-day, autonomous, and gibberellin pathways, respectively. To test whether these are the only pathways that promote flowering under long photoperiods, the co-2 fca-1 ga1-3 triple mutant was constructed. These plants never flowered under long- or short-day conditions, indicating that the three pathways impaired by these mutations are absolutely required for flowering under these conditions. The triple mutant background represents a "vegetative ground state" enabling the roles of single pathways to be described in the corresponding double mutants. The phenotypes of plants carrying all eight combinations of wild-type and mutant alleles at the three loci were compared under long- and short-day conditions. This analysis demonstrated that under long photoperiods the long-day pathway promoted flowering most effectively, whereas under short photoperiods the gibberellin pathway had the strongest effect. The autonomous pathway had a weak effect when acting alone under either photoperiod but appeared to play an important role in facilitating the promotion of flowering by the other two pathways. The vegetative phenotype of the triple mutant could be overcome by vernalization, suggesting that a fourth pathway promoted flowering under these conditions. These observations are discussed in light of current models describing the regulation of flowering time in Arabidopsis.     

EMF Genes Interact with Late-Flowering Genes to Regulate Arabidopsis Shoot Development

To investigate the genetic mechanisms regulating the transitionfrom vegetative to reproductive phase in Arabidopsis, doublemutants between two embryonic flower (emf) and 12 differentlate-flowering mutants were constructed and analyzed. Doublemutants in all combinations displayed the emf phenotypes withoutforming rosettes during early development; however, clear variationsbetween different double mutants were observed during late development,fwa significantly enhanced the vegetative property of both emfmutants by producing a high number of sessile leaves withoutany further reproductive growth in emf1 fwa double mutants.It also produced numerous leaf-like flower structures similarto those in leafy ap1 double mutant in emf1 fwa double mutants.Nine late-flowering mutants, ft, fca, ld, fd, fpa, fe, fy, fha,and fve, caused different degrees of increase in the numberof sessile leaves, the size of inflorescence, and the numberof flowers only in weak emf1 and emf2 mutant alleles background.Two late-flowering mutants, co and gi, however, had no effecton either emf1 and emf2 mutant alleles in double mutants. Ourresults suggest that FWA function in distinct pathways fromboth EMF genes to regulate flower competence by activating geneswhich specify floral meristem identity. CO and GI negativelyregulate both EMF genes, whereas the other nine late-floweringgenes may interact with EMF genes directly or indirectly toregulate shoot maturation in Arabidopsis. ¹ To whom correspondence should be addressed.     

A Mutation in the Arabidopsis TFL1 Gene Affects Inflorescence Meristem Development

We present the initial phenotypic characterization of an Arabidopsis mutation, terminal flower 1-1 (tfl1-1), that identifies a new genetic locus, TFL1. The tfl1-1 mutation causes early flowering and limits the development of the normally indeterminate inflorescence by promoting the formation of a terminal floral meristem. Inflorescence development in mutant plants often terminates with a compound floral structure consisting of the terminal flower and one or two subtending lateral flowers. The distal-most flowers frequently contain chimeric floral organs. Light microscopic examination shows no structural aberrations in the vegetative meristem or in the inflorescence meristem before the formation of floral buttresses. The wild-type appearance of lateral flowers and observations of double mutant combinations of tfl1-1 with the floral morphogenesis mutations apetala 1-1 (ap1-1), ap2-1, and agamous (ag) suggest that the tfl1-1 mutation does not affect normal floral meristems. Secondary flower formation usually associated with the ap1-1 mutation is suppressed in the terminal flower, but not in the lateral flowers, of tfl1-1 ap1-1 double mutants. Our results suggest that tfl1-1 perturbs the establishment and maintenance of the inflorescence meristem. The mutation lies on the top arm of chromosome 5 approximately 2.8 centimorgans from the restriction fragment length polymorphism marker 217.     

A genetic and physiological analysis of late flowering mutants in Arabidopsis thaliana

Summary Monogenic mutants of the early ecotype Landsberg erecta were selected on the basis of late flowering under long day (LD) conditions after treatment with ethyl methanesulphonate or irradiation. In addition to later flowering the number of rosette and cauline leaves is proportionally higher in all mutants, although the correlation coefficient between the two parameters is not the same for all genotypes. Forty-two independently induced mutants were found to represent mutations at 11 loci. The mutations were either recessive, intermediate (co locus) or almost completely dominant (fwa locus). The loci are located at distinct positions on four of the five Arabidopsis chromosomes. Recombinants carrying mutations at different loci flower later than or as late as the later parental mutant. This distinction led to the assignment of eight of the loci to three epistatic groups. In wild type, vernalization promotes flowering to a small extent. For mutants at the loci fca, fve, fy and fpa, vernalization has a large effect both under LD and short day (SD) conditions, whereas co, gi, fd and fwa mutants are almost completely insensitive to this treatment. SD induces later flowering except for mutants at the co and gi loci, which flower with the same number of leaves under LD and SD conditions. This differential response of the mutants to environmental factors and their subdivision into epistatic groups is discussed in relation to a causal model for floral initiation in Arabidopsis thaliana.     

FRIGIDA-independent variation in flowering time of natural Arabidopsis thaliana accessions

FRIGIDA (FRI) and FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC) are two genes that, unless plants are vernalized, greatly delay flowering time in Arabidopsis thaliana. Natural loss-of-function mutations in FRI cause the early flowering growth habits of many A. thaliana accessions. To quantify the variation among wild accessions due to FRI, and to identify additional genetic loci in wild accessions that influence flowering time, we surveyed the flowering times of 145 accessions in long-day photoperiods, with and without a 30-day vernalization treatment, and genotyped them for two common natural lesions in FRI. FRI is disrupted in at least 84 of the accessions, accounting for only approximately 40% of the flowering-time variation in long days. During efforts to dissect the causes for variation that are independent of known dysfunctional FRI alleles, we found new loss-of-function alleles in FLC, as well as late-flowering alleles that do not map to FRI or FLC. An FLC nonsense mutation was found in the early flowering Van-0 accession, which has otherwise functional FRI. In contrast, Lz-0 flowers late because of high levels of FLC expression, even though it has a deletion in FRI. Finally, eXtreme array mapping identified genomic regions linked to the vernalization-independent, late-flowering habit of Bur-0, which has an alternatively spliced FLC allele that behaves as a null allele.     

FALSIFLORA, the tomato orthologue of FLORICAULA and LEAFY, controls flowering time and floral meristem identity

Characterization of the tomato falsiflora mutant shows that fa mutation mainly alters the development of the inflorescence resulting in the replacement of flowers by secondary shoots, but also produces a late-flowering phenotype with an increased number of leaves below first and successive inflorescences. This pattern suggests that the FALSIFLORA (FA) locus regulates both floral meristem identity and flowering time in tomato in a similar way to the floral identity genes FLORICAULA (FLO) of Antirrhinum and LEAFY (LFY) of Arabidopsis. To analyse whether the fa phenotype is the result of a mutation in the tomato FLO/LFY gene, we have cloned and analysed the tomato FLO/LFY homologue (TOFL) in both wild-type and fa plants following a candidate gene strategy. The wild-type gene is predicted to encode a protein sharing 90% identity with NFL1 and ALF, the FLO/LFY-like proteins in Nicotiana and Petunia, and about 80 and 70% identity with either FLO or LFY. In the fa mutant, however, the gene showed a 16 bp deletion that results in a frameshift mutation and in a truncated protein. The co-segregation of this deletion with the fa phenotype in a total of 240 F2 plants analysed supports the idea that FA is the tomato orthologue to FLO and LFY. The gene is expressed in both vegetative and floral meristems, in leaf primordia and leaves, and in the four floral organs. The function of this gene in comparison with other FLO/LFY orthologues is analysed in tomato, a plant with a sympodial growth habit and a cymose inflorescence development.