简并性还是多态性?——遗传密码子设定的进化特点的剖析(英文)

遗传密码子的设定表现出令人困惑的多态性特点 :不同氨基酸拥有的密码子的数目 ,除 5个外 ,从 1个到 6个都有 .这种特点显示出密码子无论在翻译行为还是进化轨迹上 ,都存在诸多的异质性 .因此 ,简并性一词的收敛含义 ,并不能表征这种多态性的进化内涵 .没有同义密码子的AUG(Met)和UGG (Trp)并无简并现象 .其余的密码子则可分为两大类 :一类是 ,4个同义密码子为 1组 ,具有相同的第 1、2位碱基 ,并遵循“3中读 2”的读出规则 .同组的 4个同义密码子 ,不过是来自同一个双字母原始密码子 (XYN)的孑遗物 ,从这个意义上讲 ,也不宜视为简并现象 ;另一类则主要是 ,2个同义密码子为一组 ,并遵循“3中读 3”读出规则 .它们是由编码 2个氨基酸的双义原始密码子 ,第 3位的未定碱基N进一步设定形成 .至于有 6个同义密码子的 ,特别令人困感不解的组别 ,实际上是 4 + 2个 ,这启示它们可能源于上述两大类 .遗传密码子多态性的起源 ,可能始于最初阶段 ,氨基酸同某类寡核苷酸的起始二联体的相互作用 ,而完成于所有的双义原始密码子的第 3位碱基的分化 .这种进化轨迹被传统的简并性一词所模糊 ,并导致鉴定各有关理论可信性的坚实依据和令不同观点取得共识的基础被掩盖起来 .这可能就是在遗传密码子起源领域里 ,长期存在着众     

析遗传密码子多态性之谜

建立了1个由16个“3读2”原始密码子组成的系统。它们分为“语义确切”的,和“双义的”,两大类。后者,通过不同的分化方式,进一步分化为语义确切的“3读3”现代密码子;前者则无需再分化,仍保留着“3读2”原始形态,成为孑遗密码子。首次解释了氨基酸具有不同数目密码子,以及线粒体内存在反常密码子的多态性现象,初步建立了密码子进化树,并提出了原始氨酰基－tRNA合成酶可能在密码子进一步分化中起关键作用的观点。     

氨酰-tRNA合成酶的进化差异

大量研究显示,细菌与真核生物中的许多氨酰-tRNA合成酶(aaRS)在一些细菌与真核生物中的基因进化机制与模式、氨酰化途径和结构与功能的进化模式等方面往往有着明显的差异。通过对这些差异的深入研究,对于理解蛋白质的结构与功能的进化将是非常有帮助的。虽然造成这些差异的机制目前仍不清楚,但是,所有的这些差异似乎提示,在细菌与真核生物的一些基本生命活动过程中的某些方面,可能还存在着目前尚未被人们所认识到的较大差异。     

苯丙氨酰-tRNA合成酶的进化与结构域丢失

基因的复制、融合以及基因的水平转移是许多蛋白质包括氨酰 tRNA合成酶 (aminoacyl tRNAsynthetase ,AARS)进化过程中的常见事件。然而作者研究的结果显示 ,苯丙氨酰 tRNA合成酶 (phenylalanyl tRNAsynthetase,PheRS)的进化主要表现为一些结构域的丢失 ;并且这种结构域的丢失不影响PheRS的功能或活性。通常在生物从细菌到真核生物的进化过程中 ,其基因组的大小和基因的数目都有所增加 ,然而有趣的是 ,真核生物中PheRS的结构域类型和数目都明显少于细菌的PheRS。PheRS通过结构域的丢失而进化的现象 ,似乎与某些AARS功能由多重专一性向单一专一性的演化有着“异曲同工”之妙。     

关于遗传密码起源问题的几点看法

氨基酸与核苷酸之间的密码关系可能来自原始tRNA链（包括识别核苷酸及反密码子）与氨基酸的直接相互作用即原始tRNA识别或第二套遗传密码.     

遗传密码子研究进展

作为生命信息的基本遗传单位,基因组遗传密码的破译对于人们加深对生命本质的认识具有重要的理论价值和现实意义。目前,遗传密码子的研究重心已由遗传密码子的破译及反常密码子的发现转入到遗传密码子的起源与进化及扩张等研究。遗传密码子的起源与进化是当今基因组学研究的热点命题之一,相关的学说、假设层出不穷,但尚未取得实质性突破。另一方面,无义密码子的再定义及遗传密码的扩张等研究却极大的丰富和发展了遗传密码子的科学内涵,推动了生命科学研究的发展。文章综述了遗传密码子的多态性、起源与进化、无义密码子的再定义及遗传密码的扩张等方面的研究进展,并就其应用价值作了评述,期待为其在基因组学、医学等相关领域的应用研究提供参考。     

遗传密码子及其应用

作为生命信息的基本遗传单位,基因组遗传密码的破译对于人们加深对生命本质的认识具有重要的理论价值和现实意义.目前,遗传密码子的研究重心已由遗传密码子的破译及反常密码子的发现转入到遗传密码子的起源与进化及扩张等研究.遗传密码子的起源与进化是当今基因组学研究的热点命题之一,相关的学说、假设层出不穷,但尚未取得实质性突破.另一方面,无义密码子的再定义及遗传密码的扩张等研究却极大的丰富和发展了遗传密码子的科学内涵,推动了生命科学研究的发展.文章综述了遗传密码子的多态性、起源与进化、无义密码子的再定义及遗传密码的扩张等方面的研究进展,并就其应用价值作了评述,期待为其在基因组学、医学等相关领域的应用研究提供参考.     

氨酰-tRNA合成酶对tRNA的识别

氨酰-tRNA合成酶(aaRS)与tRNA的相互作用保证了蛋白质生物合成的忠实性. 氨酰-tRNA合成酶对tRNA识别的专一性依赖于aaRS特定的催化结构域和tRNA分子特异的三级结构构象. 反密码子和接受茎(包括73位)在大多数aaRS对tRNA分子的识别过程中起着关键作用, 其他部位如可变口袋、可变(茎)环等, 甚至修饰核苷酸对于一些识别过程也有重要作用.     

氨酰tRNA合成酶的分子网络和功能

氨酰tRNA合成酶是生命进化过程中最早出现的一类蛋白质,氨酰tRNA合成酶帮助氨基酸转移到相应的tRNA上,进而参与蛋白质的合成保证了生命体的严谨性和多样性.随着后基因组时代的到来,氨酰tRNA合成酶的结构和功能成为新的研究热点.结构生物学和生物信息学的研究结果表明,氨酰tRNA合成酶在真核生物体内以多聚复合物的形式行使功能,形成复杂的分子网络体系.最新的实验证据显示,氨酰tRNA合成酶不但是蛋白质合成过程中一类最重要的酶,而且参与了转录、翻译水平的调控、RNA剪接、信号传导和免疫应答等众多生命活动.     

Mutant enzymes and tRNAs as probes of the glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase: tRNA interaction

This paper focuses on several aspects of the specificity of mutants of Escherichia coli glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase (GlnRS) and tRNA^Gln. Temperature-sensitive mutants located in glnS, the gene for GlnRS, have been described previously. The mutations responsible for the temperature-sensitive phenotype were analyzed, and pseudorevertants of these mutants isolated and characterized. The nature of these mutations is discussed in terms of their location in the three-dimensional structure of the tRNA^Gln: GlnRS complex. In order to characterize the specificity of the aminoacylation reaction, mutant tRNA^Gln species were synthesized with either a 2′-deoxy AMP or 3′-deoxy AMP as their 3′-terminal nucleotide. Subsequent assays for aminoacylation and ATP/PP_i exchange activity established the esterification of glutamine to the 2′-hydroxyl of the terminal adenosine: there is no glutaminylation of the 3′-OH group. This correlates with the classification of GlnRS as a class I aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase. Mutations in tRNA^Gln are discussed which affect the recognition of GlnRS and the current concept of glutamine identity in E coli is reviewed.     

Codases: 50 years after

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (codases) catalyze aminoacylation of a particular tRNA with the corresponding amino acid at the first step of protein biosynthesis. The review considers the universal structural and functional characteristics of this largest family of enzymes, partitioned into two classes. The modes of tRNA binding and recognition, as well as additional editing activity, which are responsible for the extremely high fidelity of aminoacyl-tRNA synthesis, are discussed. The available data suggest an unusual evolutionary history for the most important components of the mechanism that ensures the proper synthesis of proteins and the association of this mechanism with amino acid biosynthesis. In addition, the review considers the secondary functions of synthetases in various cell metabolic processes, including pathophysiological ones. Their investigation may help to develop new diagnostic techniques and therapies.     

A N-H nuclear magnetic resonance study on the interaction between isoleucine tRNA and isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase from Escherichia coli

Imino ¹⁵N and ¹H resonances of Escherichia coli tRNA_l^Ile were observed in the absence and presence of E coli isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase. Upon complex formation of tRNA_l^Ile with isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase, some imino ¹⁵N-¹H resonances disappeared, and some others were significantly broadened and/or shifted in the ¹H chemical shift, while the others were observed at the same ¹⁵H-¹H chemical shifts. It was indicated that the binding of tRNA_l^Ile with IleRS affect the following four regions: the anticodon stem, the junction of the acceptor and T stems, the middle of the D stem, and the region where the tertiary base pair connects the T, D, and extra loops. This result is consistent with those of chemical footprinting and site-directed mutagenesis studies. Taken together, these three independent results reveal the recognition mechanism of tRNA_l^Ile by IleRS: IleRS recognizes all the identity determinants distributed throughout the tRNA_l^Ile molecule, which induces changes in the secondary and tertiary structures of tRNA_l^Ile.     

Mitochondrial aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase single-nucleotide polymorphisms that lead to defects in refolding but not aminoacylation

Defects in organellar translation are the underlying cause of a number of mitochondrial diseases, including diabetes, deafness, encephalopathy, and other mitochondrial myopathies. The most common causes of these diseases are mutations in mitochondria-encoded tRNAs. It has recently become apparent that mutations in nuclear-encoded components of the mitochondrial translation machinery, such as aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs), can also lead to disease. In some cases, mutations can be directly linked to losses in enzymatic activity; however, for many, their effect is unknown. To investigate how aaRS mutations impact function without changing enzymatic activity, we chose nonsynonymous single-nucleotide polymorphisms (nsSNPs) that encode residues distal from the active site of human mitochondrial phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase. The phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase variants S57C and N280S both displayed wild-type aminoacylation activity and stability with respect to their free energies of unfolding, but were less stable at low pH. Mitochondrial proteins undergo partial unfolding/refolding during import, and both S57C and N280S variants retained less activity than wild type after refolding, consistent with their reduced stability at low pH. To examine possible defects in protein folding in other aaRS nsSNPs, we compared the refolding of the human mitochondrial leucyl-tRNA synthetase variant H324Q to that of wild type. The H324Q variant had normal activity prior to unfolding, but displayed a refolding defect resulting in reduced aminoacylation compared to wild type after renaturation. These data show that nsSNPs can impact mitochondrial translation by changing a biophysical property of a protein (in this case refolding) without affecting the corresponding enzymatic activity.     

Interaction of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases with tRNA: General principles and distinguishing characteristics of the high-molecular-weight substrate recognition

This review summarizes results of numerous (mainly functional) studies that have been accumulated over recent years on the problem of tRNA recognition by aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. Development and employment of approaches that use synthetic mutant and chimeric tRNAs have demonstrated general principles underlying highly specific interaction in different systems. The specificity of interaction is determined by a certain number of nucleotides and structural elements of tRNA (constituting the set of recognition elements or specificity determinants), which are characteristic of each pair. Crystallographic structures available for many systems provide the details of the molecular basis of selective interaction. Diversity and identity of biochemical functions of the recognition elements make substantial contribution to the specificity of such interactions.