Postinhibitory overshoot of insulin release by gastric inhibitory polypeptide

Following intravenous infusion of somatostatin $\text{in vivo}$ occasionally there is a large rebound overshoot of insulin release. An $\text{in vitro}$ model to simulate this phenomenon was made by perfusing rat pancreas with gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) during simultaneous perfusion with somatostatin. Adding GIP (100 ng/ml) to the perfusate for 2 minutes beginning either 3 or 9 minutes before terminating the somatostatin perfusion produced a large overshoot in insulin release. The magnitude of overshoot was greater when medium contained 300 mg/dl glucose that when it contained 150 mg/dl glucose. Perfusion with GIP for 2 minutes beginning 9 minutes before increasing the glucose concentration of the medium from 30 to 300 mg/dl elicited a large increase in both the acute and second-phase release of insulin. These suggest that post-inhibitory overshoot of insulin release after somatostatin may be produces $\text{in vitro}$ by the suppressed action of stimulatory hormones such as GIP. Prior infusion with GIP can also potentiate glucose-stimulated insulin increase.     

Inhibition of insulin release by galanin and gastrin-releasing peptide in the anaesthetized rat

The present study was designed to determine the effects of intravenously administered galanin or gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP) on glucose- and/or glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP)-stimulated insulin release in the anaesthetized rat. Galanin inhibited glucose-stimulated insulin responses in a dose-related manner. Galanin also inhibited insulin release in response to glucose administered with GIP; this effect was due largely to inhibition of the glucose-stimulated component since galanin did not inhibit GIP-stimulated insulin release. Galanin also inhibited insulin responses to ingestion of a mixed meal. GRP inhibited glucose-stimulated insulin responses, and the insulin responses to glucose plus GIP; unlike galanin, GRP inhibited both glucose- and GIP-stimulated insulin release. GRP also inhibited insulin release following ingestion of a mixed meal. The results suggest a possible modulatory role for these neuropeptides in regulation of insulin secretion.     

Effect of jejunoileal bypass in the rat on the enteroinsular axis

The effect of jejunoileal bypass (JIB) on the enteroinsular axis was studied in vivo and in vitro in the rat. Glucose, insulin and GIP responses to oral glucose were compared in JIB and control rats. The effect of glucose and GIP on insulin release from the isolated perfused pancreas of the same animals was investigated to determine if JIB altered the sensitivity of the beta cell. Immunocytochemical studies of gut and pancreas were also carried out. Glucose, insulin and GIP responses to a glucose load were blunted after JIB, although basal GIP levels were elevated in these animals. The insulin response of the perfused JIB pancreas to GIP was 70% reduced from controls although the insulin response to glucose appeared normal. The size and area of JIB islets were unchanged from controls as was the distribution of insulin, glucagon, somatostatin and pancreatic polypeptide. GIP immunoreactive cells were present in all regions of the intestine including the JIB blind loop. This study confirms the findings of others that a relationship exists between reduced GIP and insulin response to oral glucose after JIB, and indicates that a decrease in sensitivity of the beta cell to GIP occurs following JIB that is not rapidly reversible. GIP secreted from blind loop mucosa may contribute to the high basal GIP found in JIB rats and may be causally connected to the fall in beta cell sensitivity.     

Biological activity and antidiabetic potential of synthetic fragment peptides of glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide, GIP(1-16) and (Pro3)GIP(1-16)

Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) is a key physiological insulin releasing peptide and potential antidiabetic agent. The present study was undertaken in an attempt to develop small molecular weight GIP agonist and antagonist molecules. The bioactivity of two modified C-terminally truncated fragment GIP peptides, GIP(1-16) and (Pro3)GIP(1-16), was examined in terms of insulin secretion and glucose homeostasis using BRIN-BD11 cells and type 2 diabetic mice. In vitro insulin release studies demonstrated that GIP(1-16) and (Pro3)GIP(1-16) possessed weak GIP-receptor agonist and antagonistic properties, respectively. Intraperitoneal administration of GIP(1-16) in combination with glucose to obese diabetic (ob/ob) mice did not effect the glycaemic excursion and had a marginal effect on insulin release. GIP(1-16) was substantially less effective than the native GIP(1-42). (Pro3)GIP(1-16) administration significantly curtailed (P < 0.05) the insulinotropic and glucose lowering effects of native GIP, but was significantly less effective than (Pro3)GIP. Based on the established concept of a therapeutic benefit of GIP receptor antagonism in obesity-diabetes, ob/ob mice received once daily injection of (Pro3)GIP(1-16) for 14 days. No significant effects were observed on food intake, body weight, HbA1c, glucose tolerance, metabolic response to feeding and either insulin secretion or insulin sensitivity following prolonged (Pro3)GIP(1-16) treatment. These data demonstrate that C-terminal truncation of GIP or (Pro3)GIP yields small molecular weight GIP molecules with significantly reduced biological activity that precludes therapeutic utility.     

Dietary 1-monoolein decreases postprandial GIP release by reducing jejunal transport of glucose and fatty acid in rodents

Postprandial secretion of insulin and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) is differentially regulated by not only dietary carbohydrate but also fat. Recent studies have shown that the ingestion of diacylglycerol (DAG) results in lower postprandial insulin and GIP release than that of triacylglycerol (TAG), suggesting a possible mechanism for the antiobesity effect of DAG. The structural and metabolic characteristics of DAG are believed to be responsible for its beneficial effects. This study was designed to clarify the effect of 1-monoacylglycerol [oleic acid-rich (1-MO)], the characteristic metabolite of DAG, on postprandial insulin and GIP secretion, and the underlying mechanism. Dietary 1-MO dose dependently stimulated whole body fat utilization, and reduced high-fat diet-induced body weight gain and visceral fat accumulation in mice, both of which are consistent with the physiological effect of dietary DAG. Although glucose-stimulated insulin and GIP release was augmented by the addition of fat, coingestion of 1-MO reduced the postprandial hormone release in a dose-dependent manner. Either glucose or fatty acid transport into the everted intestinal sacs and enteroendocrine HuTu-80 cells was also reduced by the addition of 1-MO. Reduction of either glucose or fatty acid transport or the nutrient-stimulated GIP release by 1-MO was nullified when the intestine was pretreated with sodium-glucose cotransporter-1 (SGLT-1) or fatty acid translocase (FAT)/CD36 inhibitor. We conclude that dietary 1-MO attenuates postprandial GIP and insulin secretion by reducing the intestinal transport of the GIP secretagogues, which may be mediated via SGLT-1 and FAT/CD36. Reduced secretion of these anabolic hormones by 1-MO may be related to the antiobesity effect of DAG.     

Effect of cholecystokinin, secretin, and gastric inhibitory polypeptide on insulin release from the isolated perfused rat pancreas

The actions of gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) on insulin release from the isolated perfused rat pancreas were compared with those of pure secretin and cholecystokinin (CCK). At dose levels physiologically achievable for GIP (1 ng/mL perfusate), infusions of CCK stimulated significant insulin release both on a weight (1 ng/mL) and a molar (770 pg/mL) basis. Although 50% as potent as GIP on a weight basis and 43% as potent on a molar basis, the insulin response to CCK was multiphasic and sustained for the duration of the infusion. The action of CCK, like that of GIP, was glucose dependent yielding no significant insulin release at a low perfusate glucose concentration (80 mg/dL). Irrespective of perfusate glucose concentration or dose (1 or 5 ng/mL), secretin failed to stimulate significant release of insulin from the perfused pancreas. It was concluded that secretin is ineffective as an incretin and that a physiological role for CCK in an enteroinsular axis awaits accurate measurement of circulating levels of immunoreactive CCK.     

GIP biology and fat metabolism

The gastrointestinal hormone, gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP), is synthesized and released from the duodenum and proximal jejunum postprandially. Its release depends upon several factors including meal content and pre-existing health status (ie. obesity, diabetes, age, etc.). It was initially discovered and named for its gastric acid inhibitory properties. However, its more physiologically relevant role appears to be as an insulinotropic agent with a stimulatory effect on insulin release and synthesis. Accordingly, it was later renamed glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide because its action on insulin release depends upon an increase in circulating levels of glucose. GIP is considered to be one of the principle incretin factors of the enteroinsular axis. The GIP receptor is a G-protein-coupled receptor belonging to the family of secretin/VIP receptors. GIP receptor mRNA is widely distributed in peripheral organs, including the pancreas, gut, adipose tissue, heart, adrenal cortex, and brain, suggesting it may have other functions in addition to the ones mentioned above. An overactive enteroinsular axis has been suggested to play a role in the pathogenesis of diabetes and obesity. In addition to stimulating insulin release, GIP has been shown to amplify the effect of insulin on target tissues. In adipose tissue, GIP has been reported to (1) stimulate fatty acid synthesis, (2) enhance insulin-stimulated incorporation of fatty acids into triglycerides, (3) increase insulin receptor affinity, and (4) increase sensitivity of insulin-stimulated glucose transport. In addition, although controversial, lipolytic properties of GIP have been proposed. The mechanism of action of GIP-induced effects on adipocytes is unknown, and it is unclear whether these effects of GIP on adipocytes are direct or indirect. However, there is now evidence that GIP receptors are expressed on adipocytes and that these receptors respond to GIP stimulation. Given the location of its release and the timing of its release, GIP is an ideal anabolic agent and expanding our understanding of its physiology will be needed to determine its exact role in the etiology of diabetes mellitus and obesity.     

Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide modulates adipocyte lipolysis and reesterification

Objective: Glucose‐dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) is an incretin released from intestinal K‐cells during the postprandial period. Previous studies have suggested that GIP may play an etiologic role in obesity; thus, the GIP receptor may represent a target for anti‐obesity drugs. The present studies were conducted to elucidate mechanisms by which GIP might promote obesity by examining the effect of GIP on both glycerol release (indicative of lipolysis) and free fatty acid (FFA) release (indicative of both lipolysis and reesterification), as well as the ability of a GIP‐specific receptor antagonist (ANTGIP) to attenuate these effects. Research Methods and Procedures: Isolated rat adipocytes were perifused on a column with 10 nM GIP alone or in combination with 10 μU/mL insulin, 1 μM isoproterenol, or 1 μM ANTGIP. Samples were collected every minute and assayed for FFA, glycerol, and lactate. Results: GIP significantly increased FFA reesterification (decreased FFA release by 25%), stimulated lipolysis (increased glycerol release by 22%), and attenuated the lipolytic response to isoproterenol by 43%. These properties were similar to those of insulin in vitro, suggesting that GIP possesses insulin‐like lipogenic effects on adipocytes. Finally, ANTGIP reversed the effects of GIP on both basal and stimulated adipocyte metabolism. Discussion: These studies provide further evidence for an important physiological role for GIP in lipid homeostasis and possibly in the pathogenesis of obesity. They also suggest that the GIP receptor may represent an excellent target for the prevention and treatment of obesity and obesity‐related type 2 diabetes.     

Xenin-25 Potentiates Glucose-dependent Insulinotropic Polypeptide Action via a Novel Cholinergic Relay Mechanism

The intestinal peptides GLP-1 and GIP potentiate glucose-mediated insulin release. Agents that increase GLP-1 action are effective therapies in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, GIP action is blunted in T2DM, and GIP-based therapies have not been developed. Thus, it is important to increase our understanding of the mechanisms of GIP action. We developed mice lacking GIP-producing K cells. Like humans with T2DM, “GIP/DT” animals exhibited a normal insulin secretory response to exogenous GLP-1 but a blunted response to GIP. Pharmacologic doses of xenin-25, another peptide produced by K cells, restored the GIP-mediated insulin secretory response and reduced hyperglycemia in GIP/DT mice. Xenin-25 alone had no effect. Studies with islets, insulin-producing cell lines, and perfused pancreata indicated xenin-25 does not enhance GIP-mediated insulin release by acting directly on the β-cell. The in vivo effects of xenin-25 to potentiate insulin release were inhibited by atropine sulfate and atropine methyl bromide but not by hexamethonium. Consistent with this, carbachol potentiated GIP-mediated insulin release from in situ perfused pancreata of GIP/DT mice. In vivo, xenin-25 did not activate c-fos expression in the hind brain or paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus indicating that central nervous system activation is not required. These data suggest that xenin-25 potentiates GIP-mediated insulin release by activating non-ganglionic cholinergic neurons that innervate the islets, presumably part of an enteric-neuronal-pancreatic pathway. Xenin-25, or molecules that increase acetylcholine receptor signaling in β-cells, may represent a novel approach to overcome GIP resistance and therefore treat humans with T2DM.     

Lack of Gastric Inhibitory Polypepetide (GIP) response to vagal stimulation in the rat

The effect of sham feeding on the plasma concentration of gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) was studied in unrestrained rats bearing chronic gastric fistulas and jugular catheters. While no increase of plasma GIP concentration could be detected during sham feeding (fistula open), during normal feeding (fistula closed), plasma GIP concentrations rose rapidly. In contrast to GIP, plasma insulin concentrations showed a rapid and phasic response during sham feeding in the absence of changes of glycemia. In anesthetized rats electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve was without any effect on plasma GIP concentration, while plasma insulin increased rapidly by as much as 150 percent. It is concluded that under the conditions used, the full gastric and/or intestinal phases of food ingestion are necessary to trigger GIP release, and that vagal activation alone is unable to stimulate GIP release in the rat.     

The effect of total parenteral nutrition (TPN) on the enteroinsular axis in the rat

The effect of 6 days of total parenteral nutrition (TPN) on the enteroinsular axis was studied in vivo and in vitro in the rat. During the TPN period, blood samples were taken from control and TPN animals to determine the comparative pattern of GIP release. Glucose, insulin and GIP responses to oral glucose (OGTT) were compared in TPN and control rats. The effect of glucose and GIP on insulin release from the isolated perfused pancreas of the same animals was investigated to determine if TPN altered the sensitivity of the beta cell. In conjunction with these studies the number and distribution of GIP-containing cells were compared in control and TPN animals. TPN resulted in no change in basal levels of glucose, insulin and IR-GIP. An exaggerated insulin response to OGTT occurred after TPN whereas the glucose response was reduced. The IR-GIP response to glucose was normal following TPN. The isolated perfused pancreas showed a 30% increase in insulin release in response to GIP after TPN. The insulin response to glucose appeared normal as did the number and distribution of GIP cells. Fluctuations in GIP and insulin levels in control animals were diurnal in nature, whereas IR-GIP levels in TPN animals remained near fasting levels. It was hypothesized that the increase in beta cell sensitivity to GIP may be causally connected to the exposure of the pancreas to chronically low levels of GIP during TPN.     

Effects of pancreastatin and chromogranin A on insulin release stimulated by various insulinotropic agents

The effects of porcine pancreastatin on insulin release stimulated by insulinotropic agents, glucagon, cholecystokinin-octapeptide (CCK-8), gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) and L-arginine, were compared to those of bovine chromogranin A (CGA) using the isolated perfused rat pancreas. Pancreastatin significantly potentiated glucagon-stimulated insulin release (first phase: 12.5 +/- 0.9 ng/8 min; second phase: 34.5 +/- 1.6 ng/25 min in controls; 16.5 +/- 1.1 ng/8 min and 44.0 +/- 2.2 ng/25 min in pancreastatin group), whereas CGA was ineffective. The first phase of L-arginine-stimulated insulin release was also potentiated by pancreastatin (6.9 +/- 0.5 ng/5 min in controls, 8.4 +/- 0.6 ng/5 min in pancreastatin group), but not by CGA. Pancreastatin did not affect CCK-8 or GIP-stimulated insulin release. Similarly, CGA did not affect insulin release stimulated by CCK-8 or GIP. These findings suggest that pancreastatin stimulates insulin release in the presence of glucagon. Because pancreastatin can have multiple effects on insulin release, which are dependent upon the local concentration of insulin effectors, pancreastatin may participate in the fine tuning of insulin release from B cells.     

Effects of cholecystokinin, secretin, and pancreatic polypeptide on secretion of gastric inhibitory polypeptide, insulin, and glucagon

Although the capacity of food components to cause more insulin secretion when given orally than when given intravenously is related significantly to increased plasma concentration of gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP), stimulated only by the oral route, questions arise as to what extent other gastrointestinal hormones modify insulin secretion either directly or by influencing the secretion of GIP. The triacontatriapeptide form of cholecystokinin (CCK₃₃), infused in dose gradients intravenously in dogs increases insulin secretion, and comparably to equimolar doses of the carboxy-terminal octapeptide of cholecystokin (CCK₈); neither compound changes fasting plasma levels of GIP or glucose. Glucagon was increased only by the largest dose of CCK₈ (0.27 ug/kg). Unlike the situation with GIP, it is not necessary to increase the plasma glucose above fasting level to obtain the insulin-releasing action of CCK. When glucose is infused intravenously (2 g in 0.5 min) at the beginning of a 15-minute infusion of CCK₈ (10 ng/kg/min), the amount of insulin release is greater than is produced by CCK₈ or glucose alone. In the same type of experiment, the infusion of GIP, in equimolar amounts as CCK₈, plus glucose causes no more insulin secretion than is stimulated by glucose alone. Secretin has only a small stimulating action on insulin release, and pancreatic polypeptide (PP) has no effect. Neither secretin nor PP affects GIP secretion, whether either is given alone, or together, or with CCK₈. Either secretin or CCK₈ inhibits oral glucose-stimulated increase in plasma GIP. These inhibitory effects are probably very much related to the hormone-induced decrease in gastric emptying, but changes in somatostatin secretion and other hormones possibly exert contributory actions. In conclusion, GIP in certain dose ranges has been reported to cause major increase in insulin secretion, but we showed that the insulin-releasing action of a small dose of glucose (2 g) infused intravenously was not augmented by GIP (44.5 ng/kg/min), although it was significantly increased by an equimolar dose of CCK₈. When plasma glucose was maintained at a fasting level, gradient equimolar dosages of CCK₈ and CCK₃₃ had comparable insulin-releasing action; GIP had no effect.     

Characterisation and biological activity of Glu3 amino acid substituted GIP receptor antagonists

Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) is an important gastrointestinal hormone, which regulates insulin release and glucose homeostasis, but is rapidly inactivated by enzymatic N-terminal truncation. Here we report the enzyme resistance and biological activity of several Glu(3)-substituted analogues of GIP namely; (Ala(3))GIP, (Lys(3))GIP, (Phe(3))GIP, (Trp(3))GIP and (Tyr(3))GIP. Only (Lys(3))GIP demonstrated moderately enhanced resistance to DPP-IV (p<0.05 to p<0.01) compared to native GIP. All analogues demonstrated a decreased potency in cAMP production (EC(50) 1.47 to 11.02 nM; p<0.01 to p<0.001) with (Lys(3))GIP and (Phe(3))GIP significantly inhibiting GIP-stimulated cAMP production (p<0.05). In BRIN-BD11 cells, (Lys(3))GIP, (Phe(3))GIP, (Trp(3))GIP and (Tyr(3))GIP did not stimulate insulin secretion with both (Lys(3))GIP and (Phe(3))GIP significantly inhibiting GIP-stimulated insulin secretion (p<0.05). Injection of each GIP analogue together with glucose in ob/ob mice significantly increased the glycaemic excursion compared to control (p<0.05 to p<0.001). This was associated with lack of significant insulin responses. (Ala(3))GIP, (Phe(3))GIP and (Tyr(3))GIP, when administered together with GIP, significantly reduced plasma insulin (p<0.05 to p<0.01) and impaired the glucose-lowering ability (p<0.05 to p<0.01) of the native peptide. The DPP-IV resistance and GIP antagonism observed were similar but less pronounced than (Pro(3))GIP. These data demonstrate that position 3 amino acid substitution of GIP with (Ala(3)), (Phe(3)), (Tyr(3)) or (Pro(3)) provides a new class of functional GIP receptor antagonists.     

Bombesin and nutrients independently and additively regulate hormone release from GIP/Ins cells

Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) regulates glucose homeostasis and high-fat diet-induced obesity and insulin resistance. Therefore, elucidating the mechanisms that regulate GIP release is important. GIP is produced by K cells, a specific subtype of small intestinal enteroendocrine (EE) cell. Bombesin-like peptides produced by enteric neurons and luminal nutrients stimulate GIP release in vivo. We previously showed that PMA, bombesin, meat hydrolysate, glyceraldehyde, and methylpyruvate increase hormone release from a GIP-producing EE cell line (GIP/Ins cells). Here we demonstrate that bombesin and nutrients additively stimulate hormone release from GIP/Ins cells. In various cell systems, bombesin and PMA regulate cell physiology by activating PKD signaling in a PKC-dependent fashion, whereas nutrients regulate cell physiology by inhibiting AMPK signaling. Western blot analyses of GIP/Ins cells using antibodies specific for activated and/or phosphorylated forms of PKD and AMPK and one substrate for each kinase revealed that bombesin and PMA, but not nutrients, activated PKC, but not PKD. Conversely, nutrients, but not bombesin or PMA, inhibited AMPK activity. Pharmacological studies showed that PKC inhibition blocked bombesin- and PMA-stimulated hormone release, but AMPK activation failed to suppress nutrient-stimulated hormone secretion. Forced expression of constitutively active vs. dominant negative PKDs or AMPKs failed to perturb bombesin- or nutrient-stimulated hormone release. Thus, in GIP/Ins cells, PKC regulates bombesin-stimulated hormone release, whereas nutrients may control hormone release by regulating the activity of AMPK-related kinases, rather than AMPK itself. These results strongly suggest that K cells in vivo independently respond to neuronal vs. nutritional stimuli via two distinct signaling pathways.     

The insulinotropic action of gastric inhibitory polypeptide.

The effect of highly purified gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) on immunoreactive insulin (IRI) secretion in the conscious fasted dog was investigated. Significant increases in IRI release were observed with intravenous administration of three different doses of GIP. These were accompanied by depression in fasting serum-glucose levels. Preliminary studies were undertaken to determine whether this insulinotropic action of GIP could be attributed to a particular segment of the GIP molecule. GIP fragments produced by cleavage with cyanogen bromide and trypsin showed no significant stimulation of IRI release. The possibility that GIP might itself enhance glucose uptake or potentiate insulin-induced glucose uptake was studied with the rat hemidiaphragm preparation. No such effect was observed. In the light of this and other recent work, it is concluded that GIP is a strong candidate for an active principle in the enteroinsular axis.     

The effect of somatostatin on release and insulinotropic action of gastric inhibitory polypeptide.

Studies were carried out in conscious dogs in which the effect of intravenous somatostatin on immunoreactive gastric inhibitory polypeptide (IR-GIP) release was investigated. In addition, the inhibitory action of somatostatin on the insulin response to pure porcine GIP was assessed. Intravenous administration of somatostatin resulted in a delayed IR-GIP and immunoreactive insulin (IRI) response to oral glucose. Somatostatin also delayed the IR-GIP response to the ingestion of fat. In both types of experiments, initial depression of IRI levels was followed by a sharp rise in IRI release. Intravenous infusion of somatostatin produced 80% inhibition of the IRI response to pure porcine GIP. It was concluded that somatostatin inhibits the physiological release of IR-GIP and the insulinotropic action of exogenous porcine GIP.