Simplifying the vertical reduction mammaplasty

The vertical reduction mammaplasty is an evolving technique. Its proponents report significantly decreased scarring, better breast shape, and more stable results compared with the standard inverted-T method, but the learning curve is long and cosmetic outcomes can be inconsistent. Many surgeons have experimented with the vertical closure before returning to methods more familiar to them. The authors present their modifications to the vertical reduction mammaplasty. Their changes simplify the preoperative markings and the intraoperative technique to shorten the learning curve while maintaining reliable aesthetic results. With the patient standing, only four preoperative marks are made: (1) the inframammary fold; (2) the breast axis; (3) the apex of the new nipple-areola complex; and (4) the medial and lateral limbs of the vertical incision. In the operating room, a medial or a superomedial pedicle is developed. Excess breast skin is resected with the inferior and lateral parenchyma as a C-shaped wedge. The lateral skin-adipose flap is redraped inferomedially and sutured to the chest wall. The inferior aspect of the breast is aggressively debulked and a gathering subcuticular stitch is started 2 cm below the nadir of the nipple-areola complex. Finally, a 38-mm to 42-mm nipple-areola complex marker is used to create a circular defect that is offset 0.5 cm medial to the vertical axis of the breast. In their series, 56 patients were treated and no major complications were noted. The median follow-up period was 17 months. The average reduction was 554.5 g per breast; however, the reduction was greater than 1000 g per breast in eight patients. The authors found that (1) chest wall anchoring improves lateral contour and minimizes axillary fullness; (2) aggressive debulking inferiorly avoids the persistent inferior bulge; and (3) starting the subcuticular gathering suture 2 cm below the nipple-areola complex followed by placement of a nipple-areola complex marker at the conclusion of the case prevents lateral deviation and corrects the nipple-areola complex teardrop deformity. These innovations accelerate the learning curve by simplifying the preoperative markings and lead to more consistent postoperative results and an improved cosmetic outcome. In conclusion, these modifications yield a simple, easily learned vertical reduction mammaplasty with aesthetically reliable results.     

Breast sensitivity after vertical mammaplasty

Breast sensation after reduction mammaplasty is a major concern for surgeons and patients. The sensitivity of 80 breasts that were reduced using Lejour's technique (a superior dermoglandular pedicle with resection at the lower quadrants) was assessed in a prospective study. Ten points were selected on each breast for this study, including the nipple, four points on the areola, and five points on the breast skin. The measurements were performed preoperatively and at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Pressure thresholds were measured with 20 Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments, temperature sensitivity with hot and cold metal probes, vibratory thresholds with the Biotesiometer, and static and moving two-point discrimination tests with a Disk-Criminator. To assess the influence of breast ptosis and hypertrophy on sensitivity, the population was divided into two groups. In group I (19 patients), the sternal notch-to-nipple distance was less than 29 cm, and less than 500 g of tissue per breast was removed. In group II (21 patients), the sternal notch-to-nipple distance was more than 29 cm, and more than 500 g of tissue was resected. The sensitivity on the nipple and areola was significantly decreased at 3 and 6 months postoperatively for all modalities. At 1 year, sensitivity recovered, and no breast or nipple-areola complex was insensitive. Pressure sensitivity was not significantly different from the preoperative measurement in any area of the breast or in either group of patients, except for superior breast skin, for which sensitivity was improved in group II (p = 0.0004). Temperature sensitivity in group I was not different preoperatively and postoperatively, but in group II, a significant decrease was observed in sensitivity for the nipple and areola (p = 0.01 and 0.004, respectively). Vibratory sensitivity was significantly decreased on the nipple, the areola, and the inferior breast skin (p = 0.01, 0.01, and 0.001, respectively) in group II but not in group I.In conclusion, ptotic or moderately hypertrophied breasts that were reduced using Lejour's technique recovered their preoperative level of sensitivity after an initial postoperative decline. However, in large breasts, although pressure sensitivity recovered after 1 year, temperature and vibration sensitivity remained diminished on the nipple-areola complex.     

Breast-feeding after vertical mammaplasty with medial pedicle

A retrospective study was performed in which the breast-feeding success of women of childbearing age (15 to 40 years) with macromastia but no prior breast surgery was compared with that of women of similar age who had undergone medial pedicle/vertical pattern reduction mammaplasty. All women completed a self-administered questionnaire that provided information on their breast-feeding success. The control group consisted of 149 women with macromastia (mean age, 27 years) who had been evaluated for possible breast reduction surgery and who had children before their consultation. The study group consisted of 58 women (mean age, 29 years) who had children after their vertical mammaplasty. The mean weight of breast tissue removed was 610 g per breast. None of the patients had absent nipple sensation. A period of 2 weeks or more was chosen as the defining duration of a successful breast-feeding attempt. Those individuals judged able to breast-feed were further classified on the basis of having breast-fed exclusively or with supplementation. The results demonstrated that, of the women who attempted to breast-feed, 61 percent in the control group and 65 percent in the study group were successful, with no significant difference between the groups (p > 0.05). The breakdown of the successful groups indicated that 36 percent in the control group and 38 percent in the study group supplemented their breast-feeding with formula. The groups were not significantly different (p > 0.05). In conclusion, this study found no significant difference in the rate of breast-feeding success between women who had medial pedicle/vertical pattern reduction mammaplasty and women who had no prior breast surgery.     

Elimination of the vertical scar in reduction mammaplasty.

We describe a technique to eliminate the vertical portion of the inverted-T incision in patients who have combined enlargement of the breasts and moderate to severe ptosis. Initial preoperative markings are made, placing the new nipple site at the level of the transposed inframammary crease. The nipple-areola complex is then retained on a vascularized pedicle, with major reduction of the breast tissue being done in the medial and lateral quadrants. The nipple and breast tissue are then tucked underneath the superior skin segment and placed in this new position as one would do with the umbilicus in an abdominoplasty. Excess vertical skin is removed, and horizontal excess is collected at the midline as a small dog-ear. We have found that this dog-ear reduces markedly with time, rounding out the inferior portion of the breasts. The remaining small amount of excess skin can then be removed under local anesthetic at a later date. We have performed this procedure on 20 patients, with follow-up from 6 to 24 months.     

The vertical mammaplasty: a reappraisal of the technique and its complications

Since 1989, superior pedicle vertical scar mammaplasty as described by Lejour has been used in the authors' department as the only technique for breast reduction. From 1991 through 1994, a series of 170 consecutive patients (330 breasts) underwent an operation. In these patients, minor complications were observed in 30 percent of the patients and major complications in 15 percent. Surgical revision for scar or volume corrections was necessary in 28 percent of the breasts, which seemed unacceptable. Therefore, the original technique was modified by decreasing the skin undermining and avoiding liposuction in the breast. Primary skin excision was performed in the submammary fold at the end of the operation if the skin could not be puckered adequately. This modified technique was used from 1996 through 1999 in 138 consecutive patients (227 breasts). In the second series, minor complications were observed in 15 percent of the patients and major complications in 5 percent. However, the technical modifications did not significantly change the rate of secondary scar and volume corrections, which were still necessary in 22 percent of the breasts. In large breasts, the addition of a horizontal scar at the end of the operation did not change the rate of secondary revision, which however compares favorably with the figures obtained with the inverted T, superior pedicle mammaplasty.     

The L short-scar mammaplasty: a new approach.

An improved L mammaplasty technique was employed in 178 patients aged 13 to 55 years, with reductions of up to 1280 gm per breast, with small, well-positioned, and undistorted scars. I have obtained a satisfactory final shape of the breast with no major complications over a 3-year follow-up period. The markings are based on chest width and on the quantity of skin that will remain. The technique allows the surgeon to remove more skin, and it is indicated for minor, moderate, and large hypertrophies, as well as for ptotic and asymmetrical breasts. The resection comprises skin and mammary tissue from the inferior and middle portions of the breast, preserving the main lactiferous ducts. In case of hypertrophic breasts, the base is removed, preserving the branches of the lateral cutaneous nerves, which derive from the third, fourth, and fifth intercostal nerves.