Thinking About the Evolution of Photosynthesis

Photosynthesis is an ancient process on Earth. Chemical evidence and recent fossil finds indicate that cyanobacteria existed 2.5-2.6 billion years (Ga) ago, and these were certainly preceded by a variety of forms of anoxygenic photosynthetic bacteria. Carbon isotope data suggest autotrophic carbon fixation was taking place at least a billion years earlier. However, the nature of the earliest photosynthetic organisms is not well understood. The major elements of the photosynthetic apparatus are the reaction centers, antenna complexes, electron transfer complexes and carbon fixation machinery. These parts almost certainly have not had the same evolutionary history in all organisms, so that the photosynthetic apparatus is best viewed as a mosaic made up of a number of substructures each with its own unique evolutionary history. There are two schools of thought concerning the origin of reaction centers and photosynthesis. One school pictures the evolution of reaction centers beginning in the prebiotic phase while the other school sees reaction centers evolving later from cytochrome b in bacteria. Two models have been put forth for the subsequent evolution of reaction centers in proteobacteria, green filamentous (non-sulfur) bacteria, cyanobacteria, heliobacteria and green sulfur bacteria. In the selective loss model the most recent common ancestor of all subsequent photosynthetic systems is postulated to have contained both RC1 and RC2. The evolution of reaction centers in proteobacteria and green filamentous bacteria resulted from the loss of RC1, while the evolution of reaction centers in heliobacteria and green sulfur bacteria resulted from the loss of RC2. Both RC1 and RC2 were retained in the cyanobacteria. In the fusion model the most recent common ancestor is postulated to have given rise to two lines, one containing RC1 and the other containing RC2. The RC1 line gave rise to the reaction centers of heliobacteria and green sulfur bacteria, and the RC2 line led to the reaction centers of proteobacteria and green filamentous bacteria. The two reaction centers of cyanobacteria were the result of a genetic fusion of an organism containing RC1 and an organism containing RC2. The evolutionary histories of the various classes of antenna/light-harvesting complexes appear to be completely independent. The transition from anoxygenic to oxygenic photosynthesis took place when the cyanobacteria learned how to use water as an electron donor for carbon dioxide reduction. Before that time hydrogen peroxide may have served as a transitional donor, and before that, ferrous iron may have been the original source of reducing power.     

Evolution of photosynthetic reaction centers

The common ancestor of all photosynthetic prokaryotes and organelles contained chlorophyll (Chl) a. All green and purple photosynthetic bacteria descended from a common bacteriochlorophyll (Bchl) a-containing ancestor which diverged from the Chl a line. Separate PS-I and PS-II reaction centers may have evolved before the appearance of Bchl a. When the transition to Bchl a occurred, the resultant organism contained two types of reaction center, “PS-I” and “PS-II.” One line of development eliminated “PS-II” and evolved into the green bacteria. The other line eliminated “PS-I” and became the purple bacteria. In the Chl a-containing organisms the evolution of PS-II continued until oxygen evolution was achieved.     

Structural Specificity of Photosynthetic Reaction Centers Provides High Efficiency of Excitation Trapping and Conversion

The atomic structures of photosynthetic reaction centers of two species of purple bacteria and two photosystems 2 of cyanobacteria were resolved in the late last century. In this work I put forward the idea that of the huge body of data available thus far, only three structural factors are responsible for the unique function of conversion of physical energy of electronic excitation into electrochemical energy of separated opposite charges in reaction centers at least in purple bacteria and, perhaps, in other photosynthetic organisms.     

Photosynthetic and phylogenetic primers for detection of anoxygenic phototrophs in natural environments.

Primer sets were designed to target specific 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) sequences of photosynthetic bacteria, including the green sulfur bacteria, the green nonsulfur bacteria, and the members of the Heliobacteriaceae (a gram-positive phylum). Due to the phylogenetic diversity of purple sulfur and purple nonsulfur phototrophs, the 16S rDNA gene was not an appropriate target for phylogenetic rDNA primers. Thus, a primer set was designed that targets the pufM gene, encoding the M subunit of the photosynthetic reaction center, which is universally distributed among purple phototrophic bacteria. The pufM primer set amplified DNAs not only from purple sulfur and purple nonsulfur phototrophs but also from Chloroflexus species, which also produce a reaction center like that of the purple bacteria. Although the purple bacterial reaction center structurally resembles green plant photosystem II, the pufM primers did not amplify cyanobacterial DNA, further indicating their specificity for purple anoxyphototrophs. This combination of phylogenetic- and photosynthesis-specific primers covers all groups of known anoxygenic phototrophs and as such shows promise as a molecular tool for the rapid assessment of natural samples in ecological studies of these organisms.     

History of concepts of the comparative biochemistry of oxygenic and anoxygenic photosyntheses

Experiments of Hans Molisch in 1907 demonstrated that purple bacteria do not evolve molecular oxygen during photosynthetic metabolism, and can use organic compounds as sources of cell carbon for anaerobic ‘photoheterotrophic’ growth. Molisch's conclusion that he discovered a new photosynthetic growth mode was not accepted for some 30 years because of the prevailing definition of photosynthesis as light-dependent conversion of carbon dioxide and inorganic reductants to cell materials. Meanwhile, during the decade of the 1930s, Cornelis van Niel formulated the ‘comparative biochemical watercleavage hypothesis’ of photosynthesis, which enjoyed great popularity for about 20 years. According to this concept, photolysis of water yielded ‘H’ and ‘OH’, the former acting as the hydrogen donor for CO₂ reduction in all modes of photosynthesis. Oxygenic organisms were presumed to contain a unique biochemical system capable of converting ‘OH’ to water and O₂. To explain the absence of O₂ formation by purple and green photosynthetic bacteria, it was supposed that such organisms lacked the oxygen-forming system and, instead, ‘OH’ was disposed of by reduction with an inorganic H(e) donor (other than water) according to the general equation: $$2 'OH' + H_2 A \to 2 H_2 O + A ,$$ where H₂A is H₂ or an inorganic sulfur compound. Critical tests of van Niel's hypothesis could not be devised, and his proposal was abandoned soon after the discovery of in vitro photophosphorylation by green plant chloroplasts and membranes of purple bacteria in 1954. Photophosphorylation was then viewed as one key common denominator of oxygenic and anoxygenic photosyntheses. From later research it became clear that light-dependent phosphorylation of adenosine diphosphate was a consequence of photochemical charge separation and electron flow in reaction centers embedded in membranes of all photosynthetic organisms. The similarities, as well as the differences, in fine structure and function of reaction centers in anoxygenic and oxygenic organisms are now believed to reflect the course of evolution of oxygenic organisms from anoxygenic photosynthetic precursors. Thus, with the acquisition of new knowledge, concepts of the comparative biochemistry of photosynthetic processes have been radically altered during the past several decades. This paper describes highpoints of the history of these changes.     

Origin and early evolution of photosynthesis

Photosynthesis was well-established on the earth at least 3.5 thousand million years ago, and it is widely believed that these ancient organisms had similar metabolic capabilities to modern cyanobacteria. This requires that development of two photosystems and the oxygen evolution capability occurred very early in the earth's history, and that a presumed phase of evolution involving non-oxygen evolving photosynthetic organisms took place even earlier. The evolutionary relationships of the reaction center complexes found in all the classes of currently existing organisms have been analyzed using sequence analysis and biophysical measurements. The results indicate that all reaction centers fall into two basic groups, those with pheophytin and a pair of quinones as early acceptors, and those with iron sulfur clusters as early acceptors. No simple linear branching evolutionary scheme can account for the distribution patterns of reaction centers in existing photosynthetic organisms, and lateral transfer of genetic information is considered as a likely possibility. Possible scenarios for the development of primitive reaction centers into the heterodimeric protein structures found in existing reaction centers and for the development of organisms with two linked photosystems are presented.Abbreviation Gyr gigayears     

Photosynthetic and Phylogenetic Primers for Detection of Anoxygenic Phototrophs in Natural Environments

Primer sets were designed to target specific 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) sequences of photosynthetic bacteria, including the green sulfur bacteria, the green nonsulfur bacteria, and the members of the Heliobacteriaceae (a gram-positive phylum). Due to the phylogenetic diversity of purple sulfur and purple nonsulfur phototrophs, the 16S rDNA gene was not an appropriate target for phylogenetic rDNA primers. Thus, a primer set was designed that targets the pufM gene, encoding the M subunit of the photosynthetic reaction center, which is universally distributed among purple phototrophic bacteria. The pufM primer set amplified DNAs not only from purple sulfur and purple nonsulfur phototrophs but also from Chloroflexus species, which also produce a reaction center like that of the purple bacteria. Although the purple bacterial reaction center structurally resembles green plant photosystem II, the pufM primers did not amplify cyanobacterial DNA, further indicating their specificity for purple anoxyphototrophs. This combination of phylogenetic- and photosynthesis-specific primers covers all groups of known anoxygenic phototrophs and as such shows promise as a molecular tool for the rapid assessment of natural samples in ecological studies of these organisms.     

Evolutionary relationships among photosynthetic prokaryotes (Heliobacterium chlorum, Chloroflexus aurantiacus, cyanobacteria, Chlorobium tepidum and proteobacteria): implications regarding the origin of photosynthesis

The presence of shared conserved insertions or deletions in proteins (referred to as signature sequences) provides a powerful means to deduce the evolutionary relationships among prokaryotic organisms. This approach was used in the present work to deduce the branching orders of various eubacterial taxa consisting of photosynthetic organisms. For this purpose, portions of the Hsp60 and Hsp70 genes, covering known signature sequence regions, were PCR-amplified and sequenced from Heliobacterium chlorum, Chloroflexus aurantiacus and Chlorobium tepidum. This information was integrated with sequence data for several other proteins from numerous species to deduce the branching orders of different photosynthetic taxa. Based on signature sequences that are present in different proteins, it is possible to infer that the various eubacterial phyla evolved from a common ancestor in the following order: low G+C Gram-positive (H. chlorum) --> high G+C Gram-positive --> Deinococcus-Thermus --> green non-sulphur bacteria (Cf. aurantiacus ) --> cyanobacteria --> spirochaetes --> Chlamydia-Cytophaga-Aquifex-flavobacteria-green sulphur bacteria (Cb. tepidum) --> proteobacteria (alpha, delta and epsilon) and --> proteobacteria (beta and gamma). The members of the Heliobacteriaceae family that contain a Fe-S type of reaction centre (RC-1) and represent the sole photosynthetic phylum from the Gram-positive or monoderm group of prokaryotes are indicated to be the most ancestral of the photosynthetic lineages. Among the Gram-negative bacteria or diderm prokaryotes, green non-sulphur bacteria such as Cf. aurantiacus, which contains a pheophytin-quinone type of reaction centre (RC-2), are indicated to have evolved very early. Thus, the organisms containing either RC-1 or RC-2 existed before the evolution of cyanobacteria, which contain both these reaction centres to carry out oxygenic photosynthesis. The eubacterial divisions consisting of green sulphur bacteria and proteobacteria are indicated to have diverged after cyanobacteria. Some implications of these results concerning the origin of photosynthesis and the earliest prokaryotic fossils are discussed.     

A model of the protein–pigment baseplate complex in chlorosomes of photosynthetic green bacteria

In contrast to photosynthetic reaction centers, which share the same structural architecture, more variety is found in the light-harvesting antenna systems of phototrophic organisms. The largest antenna system described, so far, is the chlorosome found in anoxygenic green bacteria, as well as in a recently discovered aerobic phototroph. Chlorosomes are the only antenna system, in which the major light-harvesting pigments are organized in self-assembled supramolecular aggregates rather than on protein scaffolds. This unique feature is believed to explain why some green bacteria are able to carry out photosynthesis at very low light intensities. Encasing the chlorosome pigments is a protein-lipid monolayer including an additional antenna complex: the baseplate, a two-dimensional paracrystalline structure containing the chlorosome protein CsmA and bacteriochlorophyll a (BChl a). In this article, we review current knowledge of the baseplate antenna complex, which physically and functionally connects the chlorosome pigments to the reaction centers via the Fenna–Matthews–Olson protein, with special emphasis on the well-studied green sulfur bacterium Chlorobaculum tepidum (previously Chlorobium tepidum). A possible role for the baseplate in the biogenesis of chlorosomes is discussed. In the final part, we present a structural model of the baseplate through combination of a recent NMR structure of CsmA and simulation of circular dichroism and optical spectra for the CsmA–BChl a complex.     

Electron transport in green photosynthetic bacteria

Green bacteria make up two of the four families of anoxygenic photosynthetic prokaryotes. The two families have similar pigment compositions and membrane fine structure, and both contain a specialized antenna structure known as a chlorosome. The primary photochemistry and electron transport pathways of the two groups are, however, quite distinct. The anaerobic green bacteria (Chlorobiaceae) contain low-potential iron-sulfur proteins as early electron acceptors and can directly reduce NAD⁺ in a manner reminiscent of Photosystem I of oxygenic organisms. The facultatively aerobic green bacteria (Chloroflexaceae) contain quinone-type acceptors and have an overall pattern of electron transport very similar to that found in purple bacteria. Many aspects of energy storage in green bacteria, especially photophosphorylation and the role of cytochrome b/c complexes in electron transport, remain poorly understood.     

Variety in excitation energy transfer processes from phycobilisomes to photosystems I and II

Photosynthesis Research - The light-harvesting antennas of oxygenic photosynthetic organisms capture light energy and transfer it to the reaction centers of their photosystems. The light-harvesting...     

Anoxygenic phototrophy across the phylogenetic spectrum: current understanding and future perspectives

The phylogenetic heterogeneity of anoxygenic phototrophic bacteria has been revealed by 16S rRNA sequence analysis, the results of which have led to extensive taxonomic rearrangements within previously defined taxa of phototrophs and stimulated interest in this group of organisms. Anoxygenic photosynthetic bacteria can be found within 4 of the 12 phylogenetic lineages, and in some cases are highly related to non-photosynthetic members of these groups. The largest number of phototrophs are found in the class Proteobacteria. Comparative phylogenetic analysis using 23S rDNA sequences generally supports the topology obtained from 16S rDNA sequences. The photosynthetic reaction centers are conserved in all photosynthetic bacteria, and are of two types. One is shared by the Proteobacteria and Chloroflexus aurantiacus and is similar to Photosystem II of cyanobacteria, while heliobacteria and Chlorobium and relatives possess a reaction center similar to the cyanobacterial Photosystem I. These similarities are supported by sequence analysis of core reaction center peptides, but contradict phylogenies reconstructed from rRNA sequence analysis. Genome analysis by means of physical mapping has been performed for only three species of anoxygenic phototrophs. Some conservation of operon structure and gene sequence has been found within the Proteobacteria, but does not extend to other phototrophs. Received: 29 December 1995 / Accepted: 19 July 1996     

The reaction centre from green sulphur bacteria: progress towards structural elucidation

The reaction centre (RC) of green sulphur bacteria is a FeS-type RC, as are the RCs of Photosystems I (PS I) of oxygenic photosynthetic organisms and of heliobacteria. The core domains of both green sulphur bacterial and heliobacterial RCs are considered to be homodimeric, in contrast to those of purple bacteria, PS I and Photosystem II (PS II). This paper briefly describes the techniques of electron microscopy and image processing suited to investigate the structure of these proteins. Recent advances in the study of the structure of the green sulphur bacterial RC, primarily achieved by the application of scanning transmission electron microscopy, are reviewed.This revised version was published online in October 2005 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

On the quenching of the fluorescence yield in photosynthetic systems

A modified matrix model describing transfer of excitation energy in the photosynthetic pigment system is discussed. In addition to the antenna pigments and reaction centers of the simple matrix model, a coupling complex is postulated mediating energy transfer between antenna and reaction centers. The values of the parameters describing the transfer properties of the coupling complex can be chosen in such a way that a number of recent unexplained measurements of fluorescence properties of various purple bacteria can be described. If such coupling complexes are present in oxygen evolving organisms, some of their properties must be different from those of purple bacteria.     

The ultrastructure of Chlorobaculum tepidum revealed by cryo-electron tomography

Chlorobaculum (Cba) tepidum is a green sulfur bacterium that oxidizes sulfide, elemental sulfur, and thiosulfate for photosynthetic growth. As other anoxygenic green photosynthetic bacteria, Cba tepidum synthesizes bacteriochlorophylls for the assembly of a large light-harvesting antenna structure, the chlorosome. Chlorosomes are sac-like structures that are connected to the reaction centers in the cytoplasmic membrane through the BChl α-containing Fenna–Matthews–Olson protein. Most components of the photosynthetic machinery are known on a biophysical level, however, the structural integration of light harvesting with charge separation is still not fully understood. Despite over two decades of research, gaps in our understanding of cellular architecture exist. Here we present an in-depth analysis of the cellular architecture of the thermophilic photosynthetic green sulfur bacterium of Cba tepidum by cryo-electron tomography. We examined whole hydrated cells grown under different electron donor conditions. Our results reveal the distribution of chlorosomes in 3D in an unperturbed cell, connecting elements between chlorosomes and the cytoplasmic membrane and the distribution of reaction centers in the cytoplasmic membrane.     

Chlorobium tepidum mutant lacking bacteriochlorophyll c made by inactivation of the bchK gene,encoding bacteriochlorophyll c synthase

The gene encoding bacteriochlorophyll (BChl) c synthase was identified by insertional inactivation in the photosynthetic green sulfur bacterium Chlorobium tepidum and was named bchK. The bchK mutant of C. tepidum was rusty-orange in color and completely lacked BChl c. Because of the absence of the BChl c antenna, the mutant grew about seven times slower than the wild type at light intensities that were limiting to the wild type (< 90 micromol m(-2) s(-1)). Various pheophorbides, which probably represent precursors of BChl c which had lost magnesium, accumulated in the mutant cells. A small fraction of these pheophorbides were apparently esterified by the remaining chlorophyll (Chl) a and BChl a synthases in cells. The amounts of BChl a, Chl a, isoprenoid quinones, carotenoids, Fenna-Matthews-Olson protein, and chlorosome envelope protein CsmA were not significantly altered on a cellular basis in the mutant compared to in the wild type. This suggests that the BChl a antennae, photosynthetic reaction centers, and remaining chlorosome components were essentially unaffected in the mutant. Electron microscopy of thin sections revealed that the mutant lacked normal chlorosomes. However, a fraction containing vestigial chlorosomes, denoted "carotenosomes," was partly purified by density centrifugation; these structures contained carotenoids, isoprenoid quinones, and a 798-nm-absorbing BChl a species that is probably protein associated. Because of the absence of the strong BChl c absorption found in the wild type, the bchK mutant should prove valuable for future analyses of the photosynthetic reaction center and of the roles of BChl a in photosynthesis in green bacteria. An evolutionary implication of our findings is that the photosynthetic ancestor of green sulfur bacteria could have evolved without chlorosomes and BChl c and instead used only BChl a-containing proteins as the major light-harvesting antennae.     

Primary photochemistry of reaction centers from the photosynthetic purple bacteria

Photosynthetic organisms transform the energy of sunlight into chemical potential in a specialized membrane-bound pigment-protein complex called the reaction center. Following light activation, the reaction center produces a charge-separated state consisting of an oxidized electron donor molecule and a reduced electron acceptor molecule. This primary photochemical process, which occurs via a series of rapid electron transfer steps, is complete within a nanosecond of photon absorption. Recent structural data on reaction centers of photosynthetic bacteria, combined with results from a large variety of photochemical measurements have expanded our understanding of how efficient charge separation occurs in the reaction center, and have changed many of the outstanding questions.Abbreviations BChl bacteriochlorophyll - P a dimer of BChl molecules - BPh bacteriopheophytin - Q_A and Q_B quinone molecules - L, M and H light, medium and heavy polypeptides of the reaction center     

Physiology and phylogeny of green sulfur bacteria forming a monospecific phototrophic assemblage at a depth of 100 meters in the Black Sea

The biomass, phylogenetic composition, and photoautotrophic metabolism of green sulfur bacteria in the Black Sea was assessed in situ and in laboratory enrichments. In the center of the western basin, bacteriochlorophyll e (BChl e) was detected between depths of 90 and 120 m and reached maxima of 54 and 68 ng liter(-1). High-pressure liquid chromatography analysis revealed a dominance of farnesyl esters and the presence of four unusual geranyl ester homologs of BChl e. Only traces of BChl e (8 ng liter(-1)) were found at the northwestern slope of the Black Sea basin, where the chemocline was positioned at a significantly greater depth of 140 m. Stable carbon isotope fractionation values of farnesol indicated an autotrophic growth mode of the green sulfur bacteria. For the first time, light intensities in the Black Sea chemocline were determined employing an integrating quantum meter, which yielded maximum values between 0.0022 and 0.00075 micromol quanta m(-2) s(-1) at the top of the green sulfur bacterial layer around solar noon in December. These values represent by far the lowest values reported for any habitat of photosynthetic organisms. Only one 16S rRNA gene sequence type was detected in the chemocline using PCR primers specific for green sulfur bacteria. This previously unknown phylotype groups with the marine cluster of the Chlorobiaceae and was successfully enriched in a mineral medium containing sulfide, dithionite, and freshly prepared yeast extract. Under precisely controlled laboratory conditions, the enriched green sulfur bacterium proved to be capable of exploiting light intensities as low as 0.015 micromol quanta m(-2) s(-1) for photosynthetic 14CO2 fixation. Calculated in situ doubling times of the green sulfur bacterium range between 3.1 and 26 years depending on the season, and anoxygenic photosynthesis contributes only 0.002 to 0.01% to total sulfide oxidation in the chemocline. The stable population of green sulfur bacteria in the Black Sea chemocline thus represents the most extremely low-light-adapted and slowest-growing type of phototroph known to date.     

Characterization of three homologs of the large subunit of the magnesium chelatase from Chlorobaculum tepidum and interaction with the magnesium protoporphyrin IX methyltransferase

Green bacteria synthesize several types of (bacterio)chlorophylls for the assembly of functional photosynthetic reaction centers and antenna complexes. A distinctive feature of green bacteria compared with other photosynthetic microbes is that their genomes contain multiple homologs of the large subunit (BchH) of the magnesium chelatase which is a three-subunit enzyme complex (BchH, BchD, and BchI) that inserts magnesium into protoporphyrin IX as the first committed step of (bacterio)chlorophyll biosynthesis. There is speculation that the additional BchH homologs may regulate the biosynthesis of each type of chlorophyll, although the biochemical properties of the different magnesium chelatase complexes from a single species of green bacteria have not yet been compared. In this study, we investigated the activities of all three chelatase complexes from the green sulfur bacterium Chlorobaculum tepidum and interactions with the next enzyme in the pathway, magnesium protoporphyrin IX methyltransferase (BchM). Although all three chelatase complexes insert magnesium into protoporphyrin IX, the activities range by a factor of 10(5). Further, there are differences in the interactions between the BchH homologs and BchM; two of the subunits increase the methyltransferase activity by 30-60%, and the third decreases it by 30%. Expression of the chelatase complexes alone and together with BchM in Escherichia coli overproducing protoporphyrin IX suggests that the chelatase is the rate-limiting enzyme. We observed that BchM uses protoporphyrin IX without bound metal as a substrate. Our results conflict with expectations generated by previous gene inactivation studies and suggest a complex regulation of chlorophyll biosynthesis in green bacteria.     

Comparison of proton transfer paths to the QA and QB sites of the Rb. sphaeroides photosynthetic reaction centers

Photosynthesis Research - The photosynthetic bacterial reaction centers from purple non-sulfur bacteria use light energy to drive the transfer of electrons from cytochrome c to ubiquinone....