Role of insulin receptor dimerization domains in ligand binding, cooperativity, and modulation by anti-receptor antibodies

To define the structures within the insulin receptor (IR) that are required for high affinity ligand binding, we have used IR fragments consisting of four amino-terminal domains (L1, cysteine-rich, L2, first fibronectin type III domain) fused to sequences encoded by exon 10 (including the carboxyl terminus of the alpha-subunit). The fragments contained one or both cysteine residues (amino acids 524 and 682) that form disulfides between alpha-subunits in native IR. A dimeric fragment designated IR593.CT (amino acids 1-593 and 704-719) bound (125)I-insulin with high affinity comparable to detergent-solubilized wild type IR and mIR.Fn0/Ex10 (amino acids 1-601 and 650-719) and greater than that of dimeric mIR.Fn0 (amino acids 1-601 and 704-719) and monomeric IR473.CT (amino acids 1-473 and 704-719). However, neither IR593.CT nor mIR.Fn0 exhibited negative cooperativity (a feature characteristic of the native insulin receptor and mIR.Fn0/Ex10), as shown by failure of unlabeled insulin to accelerate dissociation of bound (125)I-insulin. Anti-receptor monoclonal antibodies that recognize epitopes in the first fibronectin type III domain (amino acids 471-593) and inhibit insulin binding to wild type IR inhibited insulin binding to mIR.Fn0/Ex10 but not IR593.CT or mIR.Fn0. We conclude the following: 1) precise positioning of the carboxyl-terminal sequence can be a critical determinant of binding affinity; 2) dimerization via the first fibronectin domain alone can contribute to high affinity ligand binding; and 3) the second dimerization domain encoded by exon 10 is required for ligand cooperativity and modulation by antibodies.     

Dimeric fragment of the insulin receptor alpha-subunit binds insulin with full holoreceptor affinity

The insulin receptor (IR) is a dimeric receptor, and its activation is thought to involve cross-linking between monomers initiated by binding of a single insulin molecule to separate epitopes on each monomer. We have previously shown that a minimized insulin receptor consisting of the first three domains of the human IR fused to 16 amino acids from the C-terminal of the alpha-subunit was monomeric and bound insulin with nanomolar affinity (Kristensen, C., Wiberg, F. C., Sch?ffer, L., and Andersen, A. S. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 17780-17786). To investigate the insulin binding properties of dimerized alpha-subunits, we have reintroduced the domains containing alpha-alpha disulfide bonds into this minireceptor. When inserting either the first fibronectin type III domain or the full-length sequence of exon 10, the receptor fragments were predominantly secreted as disulfide-linked dimers that both had nanomolar affinity for insulin, similar to the affinity found for the minireceptor. However, when both these domains were included we obtained a soluble dimeric receptor that bound insulin with 1000-fold higher affinity (4-8 pm) similar to what was obtained for the solubilized holoreceptor (14-24 pm). Moreover, dissociation of labeled insulin from this receptor was accelerated in the presence of unlabeled insulin, demonstrating another characteristic feature of the holoreceptor. This is the first direct demonstration showing that the alpha-subunit of IR contains all the epitopes required for binding insulin with full holoreceptor affinity.     

Prediction of a novel internal rearrangement of the insulin receptor

The insulin receptor (IR) plays critical roles in metabolism and growth, directed by the binding of insulin. Decades of research to understand the mechanism of insulin binding and activation of the IR have identified a region of the receptor, the C-terminal (CT) peptide, to be crucial for insulin binding. In particular, a truncated IR consisting of the first three domains fused to the CT peptide was found to bind insulin with nanomolar affinity, with undetectable binding in the absence of fused or soluble CT peptide. Problematically, all current crystal structures of the IR indicate the fusion point of the CT peptide to the three domains is located far from the position of the CT peptide as resolved in such structures. We have attempted to address this problem using molecular modelling and dynamics simulations. The results led to the identification of a potential inter-domain interaction between the L2 domain and the CT peptide that is not observed in any of the crystal structures of the IR. Investigations into this new interaction found a conformational change that could potentially be in response to insulin binding. Additionally, further simulation work with the new conformation demonstrated its compatibility with the position and orientation of insulin from the latest insulin-bound IR crystal structure.     

Specificity of insulin and insulin-like growth factor I receptors investigated using chimeric mini-receptors. Role of C-terminal of receptor alpha subunit

We have investigated the role of the C-terminal of the alpha-subunit in the insulin receptor family by characterizing chimeric mini-receptor constructs comprising the first three domains (468 amino acids) of insulin receptor (IR) or insulin-like growth factor I receptor (IGFIR) combined with C-terminal domain from either insulin receptor (IR) (residues 704-719), IGFIR, or insulin receptor-related receptor (IRRR). The constructs were stably expressed in baby hamster kidney cells and purified, and binding affinities were determined for insulin, IGFI, and a single chain insulin/IGFI hybrid. The C-terminal domain of IRRR was found to abolish binding in IR and IGFIR context, whereas other constructs bound ligands. The two constructs with first three domains of the IR demonstrated low specificity for ligands, all affinities ranging from 3.0 to 15 nM. In contrast, the constructs with the first three domains of the IGFIR had high specificity, the affinity of the novel minimized IGFIR for IGFI was 1.5 nM, whereas the affinity for insulin was more than 3000 nM. When swapping the C-terminal domains in either receptor context only minor changes were observed in affinities (<3-fold), demonstrating that the carboxyl-terminal of IR and IGFIR alpha-subunits are interchangeable and suggesting that this domain is part of the common binding site.     

The isolated N-terminal domain of the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor binds exendin peptides with much higher affinity than GLP-1

Two fragments of the receptor for glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), each containing the N-terminal domain, were expressed and characterized in either bacterial or mammalian cells. The first fragment, rNT-TM1, included the N-terminal domain and first transmembrane helix and was stably expressed in the membrane of human embryonic kidney 293 cells. The second, 6H-rNT, consisted of only the N-terminal domain of the receptor fused with a polyhistidine tag at its N terminus. The latter fragment was expressed in Escherichia coli in the form of inclusion bodies from which the protein was subsequently purified and refolded in vitro. Although both receptor fragments displayed negligible (125)I-labeled GLP-1(7-36)amide-specific binding, they both displayed high affinity for the radiolabeled peptide antagonist (125)I-exendin-4(9-39). Competition binding studies demonstrated that the N-terminal domain of the GLP-1 receptor maintains high affinity for the agonist exendin-4 as well as the antagonists exendin-4(3-39) and exendin-4(9-39) whereas, in contrast, GLP-1 affinity was greatly reduced. This study shows that although the exendin antagonists are not dependent upon the extracellular loops and transmembrane helices for maintaining their normal high affinity binding, the endogenous agonist GLP-1 requires regions outside of the N-terminal domain. Hence, distinct structural features in exendin-4, between residues 9 and 39, provide additional affinity for the N-terminal domain of the receptor. These data are consistent with a model for the binding of peptide ligands to the GLP-1 receptor in which the central and C-terminal regions of the peptides bind to the N terminus of the receptor, whereas the N-terminal residues of peptide agonists interact with the extracellular loops and transmembrane helices.     

Identification of determinants that confer ligand specificity on the insulin receptor.

We have previously shown, using truncated soluble recombinant receptors, that substituting the 62 N-terminal amino acids of the alpha subunit from the insulin-like growth factor I receptor (IGFIR) with the corresponding 68 amino acids from the insulin receptor (IR) results in a chimeric receptor with an approximately 200-fold increase in affinity for insulin and only a 5-fold decrease in insulin-like growth factor I (IGFI) affinity (Kjeldsen, T., Andersen, A. S., Wiberg, F. C., Rasmussen, J. S., Sch?ffer, L., Balschmidt, P., M?ller, K. B., and M?ller, N. P. H. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 88, 4404-4408). We demonstrate that these 68 N-terminal amino acids of the IR also confer insulin affinity on the intact IGFI holoreceptor both in the membrane-bound state and when solubilized by Triton X-100. Furthermore, this domain can be subdivided into two regions (amino acids 1-27 and 28-68 of the IR alpha subunit) that, when replacing the corresponding IGFIR sequences, increases the insulin affinity of truncated soluble receptor chimeras 8- and 20-fold, respectively, with only minor effects on the IGFI affinity. Within the latter of these two regions, we found that amino acids 38-68 of the IR, representing 13 amino acid differences from IGFIR, confer the same 20-fold increase in insulin affinity on the IGFIR. Finally, the amino acids from position 42 to 50 are not responsible for this increase in insulin affinity. We thus propose that at least two determinants within the 68 N-terminal amino acids of the insulin receptor are involved in defining the ligand specificity of the insulin receptor, and that one or a combination of the remaining seven amino acid differences between position 38 and 68 are involved in conferring insulin affinity on the insulin receptor.     

Alanine scanning mutagenesis of a type 1 insulin-like growth factor receptor ligand binding site

The high resolution crystal structure of an N-terminal fragment of the IGF-I receptor, has been reported. While this fragment is itself devoid of ligand binding activity, mutational analysis has indicated that its N terminus (L1, amino acids 1-150) and the C terminus of its cysteine-rich domain (amino acids 190-300) contain ligand binding determinants. Mutational analysis also suggests that amino acids 692-702 from the C terminus of the alpha subunit are critical for ligand binding. A fusion protein, formed from these fragments, binds IGF-I with an affinity similar to that of the whole extracellular domain, suggesting that these are the minimal structural elements of the IGF-I binding site. To further characterize the binding site, we have performed structure directed and alanine-scanning mutagenesis of L1, the cysteine-rich domain and amino acids 692-702. Alanine mutants of residues in these regions were transiently expressed as secreted recombinant receptors and their affinity was determined. In L1 alanine mutants of Asp(8), Asn(11), Tyr(28), His(30), Leu(33), Leu(56), Phe(58), Arg(59), and Trp(79) produced a 2- to 10-fold decrease in affinity and alanine mutation of Phe(90) resulted in a 23-fold decrease in affinity. In the cysteine-rich domain, mutation of Arg(240), Phe(241), Glu(242), and Phe(251) produced a 2- to 10-fold decrease in affinity. In the region between amino acids 692 and 702, alanine mutation of Phe(701) produced a receptor devoid of binding activity and alanine mutations of Phe(693), Glu(693), Asn(694), Leu(696), His(697), Asn(698), and Ile(700) exhibited decreases in affinity ranging from 10- to 30-fold. With the exception of Trp(79), the disruptive mutants in L1 form a discrete epitope on the surface of the receptor. Those in the cysteine-rich domain essential for intact affinity also form a discrete epitope together with Trp(79).     

Complementation analysis demonstrates that insulin cross-links both alpha subunits in a truncated insulin receptor dimer

The insulin receptor is a homodimer composed of two alphabeta half receptors. Scanning mutagenesis studies have identified key residues important for insulin binding in the L1 domain (amino acids 1-150) and C-terminal region (amino acids 704-719) of the alpha subunit. However, it has not been shown whether insulin interacts with these two sites within the same alpha chain or whether it cross-links a site from each alpha subunit in the dimer to achieve high affinity binding. Here we have tested the contralateral binding mechanism by analyzing truncated insulin receptor dimers (midi-hIRs) that contain complementary mutations in each alpha subunit. Midi-hIRs containing Ala(14), Ala(64), or Gly(714) mutations were fused with Myc or FLAG epitopes at the C terminus and were expressed separately by transient transfection. Immunoblots showed that R14A+FLAG, F64A+FLAG, and F714G+Myc mutant midi-hIRs were expressed in the medium but insulin binding activity was not detected. However, after co-transfection with R14A+FLAG/F714G+Myc or F64A+FLAG/F714G+Myc, hybrid dimers were obtained with a marked increase in insulin binding activity. Competitive displacement assays revealed that the hybrid mutant receptors bound insulin with the same affinity as wild type and also displayed curvilinear Scatchard plots. In addition, when hybrid mutant midi-hIR was covalently cross-linked with (125)I(A14)-insulin and reduced, radiolabeled monomer was immunoprecipitated only with anti-FLAG, demonstrating that insulin was bound asymmetrically. These results demonstrate that a single insulin molecule can contact both alpha subunits in the insulin receptor dimer during high affinity binding and this property may be an important feature for receptor signaling.     

Characterization of insulin/IGF hybrid receptors: contributions of the insulin receptor L2 and Fn1 domains and the alternatively spliced exon 11 sequence to ligand binding and receptor activation

The IR (insulin receptor) and IGFR (type I insulin-like growth factor receptor) are found as homodimers, but the respective pro-receptors can also heterodimerize to form insulin-IGF hybrid receptors. There are conflicting data on the ligand affinity of hybrids, and especially on the influence of different IR isoforms. To investigate further the contribution of individual ligand binding epitopes to affinity and specificity in the IR/IGFR family, we generated hybrids incorporating both IR isoforms (A and B) and IR/IGFR domain-swap chimaeras, by ectopic co-expression of receptor constructs in Chinese hamster ovary cells, and studied ligand binding using both radioligand competition and bioluminescence resonance energy transfer assays. We found that IR-A-IGFR and IR-B-IGFR hybrids bound insulin with similar relatively low affinity, which was intermediate between that of homodimeric IR and homodimeric IGFR. However, both IR-A-IGFR and IR-B-IGFR hybrids bound IGF-I and IGF-II with high affinity, at a level comparable with homodimeric IGFR. Incorporation of a significant fraction of either IR-A or IR-B into hybrids resulted in abrogation of insulin- but not IGF-I-stimulated autophosphorylation. We conclude that the sequence of 12 amino acids encoded by exon 11 of the IR gene has little or no effect on ligand binding and activation of IR-IGFR hybrids, and that hybrid receptors bind IGFs but not insulin at physiological concentrations regardless of the IR isoform they contained. To reconstitute high affinity insulin binding within a hybrid receptor, chimaeras in which the IGFR L1 or L2 domains had been replaced by equivalent IR domains were co-expressed with full-length IR-A or IR-B. In the context of an IR-A-IGFR hybrid, replacement of IR residues 325-524 (containing the L2 domain and part of the first fibronectin domain) with the corresponding IGFR sequence increased the affinity for insulin by 20-fold. We conclude that the L2 and/or first fibronectin domains of IR contribute in trans with the L1 domain to create a high affinity insulin-binding site within a dimeric receptor.     

Insulin and insulin-like growth factor-1 binding specificity is determined by distinct regions of their cognate receptors.

Chimeric insulin/insulin-like growth factor-1 receptors and insulin receptor alpha-subunit point mutants were characterized with respect to their binding properties for insulin and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) and their ability to translate ligand interaction into tyrosine kinase activation in intact cells. We found that replacement of the amino-terminal 137 amino acids of the insulin receptor (IR) with the corresponding 131 amino acids of the IGF-1 receptor (IGF-1R) resulted in loss of affinity for both ligands. Further replacement of the adjacent cysteine region with IGF-1R sequences fully reconstituted affinity for IGF-1, but only marginally for insulin. Unexpectedly, replacement of the IR cysteine-rich domain alone by IGF-1R sequences created a high affinity receptor for both insulin and IGF-1. The binding characteristics of all receptor chimeras reflected the potential of both ligands to regulate the receptor tyrosine kinase activity in intact cells. Our chimeric receptor data, in conjunction with IR amino-terminal domain point mutants, strongly suggest major contributions of structural determinants in both amino- and carboxyl-terminal IR alpha-subunit regions for the formation of the insulin-binding pocket, whereas, surprisingly, the residues defining IGF-1 binding are present predominantly in the cysteine-rich domain of the IGF-1R.     

Characterization of the functional insulin binding epitopes of the full-length insulin receptor

Mutational analyses of the secreted recombinant insulin receptor extracellular domain have identified a ligand binding site composed of residues located in the L1 domain (amino acids 1-470) and at the C terminus of the alpha subunit (amino acids 705-715). To evaluate the physiological significance of this ligand binding site, we have transiently expressed cDNAs encoding full-length receptors with alanine mutations of the residues forming the functional epitopes of this binding site and determined their insulin binding properties. Insulin bound to wild-type receptors with complex kinetics, which were fitted to a two-component sequential model; the Kd of the high affinity component was 0.03 nM and that of the low affinity component was 0.4 nM. Mutations of Arg14, Phe64, Phe705, Glu706, Tyr708, Asn711, and Val715 inactivated the receptor. Alanine mutation of Asn15 resulted in a 20-fold decrease in affinity, whereas mutations of Asp12, Gln34, Leu36, Leu37, Leu87, Phe89, Tyr91, Lys121, Leu709, and Phe714 all resulted in 4-10-fold decreases. When the effects of the mutations were compared with those of the same mutations of the secreted recombinant receptor, significant differences were observed for Asn15, Leu37, Asp707, Leu709, Tyr708, Asn711, Phe714, and Val715, suggesting that the molecular basis for the interaction of each form of the receptor with insulin differs. We also examined the effects of alanine mutations of Asn15, Gln34, and Phe89 on insulin-induced receptor autophosphorylation. They had no effect on the maximal response to insulin but produced an increase in the EC50 commensurate with their effect on the affinity of the receptor for insulin.     

Comparison of the functional insulin binding epitopes of the A and B isoforms of the insulin receptor

The human insulin receptor is expressed as two isoforms that are generated by alternate splicing of its mRNA; the B isoform has 12 additional amino acids (718-729) encoded by exon 11 of the gene. The isoforms have been reported to have different ligand binding properties. To further characterize their insulin binding properties, we have performed structure-directed alanine-scanning mutagenesis of a major insulin binding site of the receptor, formed from the receptor L1 domain (amino acids 1-470) and amino acids 705-715 at the C terminus of the alpha subunit. Alanine mutants of each isoform were transiently expressed as recombinant secreted extracellular domain in 293 cells, and their insulin binding properties were evaluated by competitive binding assays. Mutation of Arg(86) and Phe(96) of each isoform resulted in receptors that were not secreted. The Kds of unmutated receptors were almost identical for both isoforms. Several new mutations compromising insulin binding were identified. In L1, mutation of Leu(37) decreased affinity 20- to 40-fold and mutations of Val(94), Glu(97), Glu(120), and Lys(121) 3 to 10-fold for each isoform. A number of mutations produced differential effects on the two isoforms. Mutation of Asn(15) in the L1 domain and Phe(714) at the C terminus of the alpha subunit inactivated the A isoform but only reduced the affinity of the B isoform 40- to 60-fold. At the C terminus of the alpha subunit, mutations of Asp(707), Val(713), and Val(715) produced 7- to 16-fold reductions in affinity of the A isoform but were without effect on the B isoform. In contrast, alanine mutations of Tyr(708) and Asn(711) inactivated the B isoform but only reduced the affinities of the A isoform 11- and 6-fold, respectively. In conclusion, alanine-scanning mutagenesis of the insulin receptor A and B isoforms has identified several new side chains contributing to insulin binding and indicates that the energetic contributions of certain side chains differ in each isoform, suggesting that different molecular mechanisms are used to obtain the same affinity.     

Three distinct epitopes on the extracellular face of the glucagon receptor determine specificity for the glucagon amino terminus

The glucagon and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptors are homologous family B seven-transmembrane (7TM) G protein-coupled receptors, and they selectively recognize the homologous peptide hormones glucagon (29 amino acids) and GLP-1 (30-31 amino acids), respectively. The amino-terminal extracellular domain of the glucagon and GLP-1 receptors (140-150 amino acids) determines specificity for the carboxyl terminus of glucagon and GLP-1, respectively. In addition, the glucagon receptor core domain (7TM helices and connecting loops) strongly determines specificity for the glucagon amino terminus. Only 4 of 15 residues are divergent in the glucagon and GLP-1 amino termini; Ser2, Gln3, Tyr10, and Lys12 in glucagon and the corresponding Ala8, Glu9, Val16, and Ser18 in GLP-1. In this study, individual substitution of these four residues of glucagon with the corresponding residues of GLP-1 decreased the affinity and potency at the glucagon receptor relative to glucagon. Substitution of distinct segments of the glucagon receptor core domain with the corresponding segments of the GLP-1 receptor rescued the affinity and potency of specific glucagon analogs. Site-directed mutagenesis identified the Asp385 --> Glu glucagon receptor mutant that specifically rescued Ala2-glucagon. The results show that three distinct epitopes of the glucagon receptor core domain determine specificity for the N terminus of glucagon. We suggest a glucagon receptor binding model in which the extracellular ends of TM2 and TM7 are close to and determine specificity for Gln3 and Ser2 of glucagon, respectively. Furthermore, the second extracellular loop and/or proximal segments of TM4 and/or TM5 are close to and determine specificity for Lys12 of glucagon.     

Human interferon-gamma receptor. Mapping of epitopes recognized by neutralizing antibodies using native and recombinant receptor proteins.

Monoclonal antibodies produced against native interferon-gamma receptor (IFN gamma-R) have been characterized for their capacity to react with purified receptor and receptor-positive cells, to inhibit the binding of IFN gamma to cellular receptor, to precipitate the receptor protein when cross-linked to IFN-gamma, and to recognize the recombinant interferon-gamma receptor and 19 overlapping fragments of this protein expressed in Escherichia coli. The results of this analysis showed that: (i) the extracellular portion of human IFN gamma-R is located between the N terminus and the transmembrane region (amino acids 18-246). (ii) The intracellular domain is between the transmembrane region and the C terminus (amino acids 269-489). (iii) The monoclonal antibodies that react with the IFN gamma-R intracellular domain recognize small linear epitopes. (iv) The human IFN gamma-R binding site is located between the N terminus and the transmembrane region. (v) The monoclonal antibodies that react with IFN gamma-R extracellular domain and inhibit the binding of IFN gamma recognize two different epitopes. One of these epitopes (included between amino acids 26 and 133) is very close to the binding site for IFN gamma. The second (included between amino acids 70 and 210) is related to the binding site for IFN gamma without including it. (vi) These two functional epitopes are conformational and need S-S bridges to maintain their architecture. (vii) These conformational epitopes are formed in receptor fragments expressed in E. coli.     

The interaction site for tamoxifen aziridine with the bovine estrogen receptor

Calf uterine estrogen receptor was covalently labeled with [3H]tamoxifen aziridine during affinity chromatography purification. After carboxymethylation, affinity labeled receptor was digested with trypsin under limit conditions and the labeled peptides were fractionated by reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography into one major and two minor components. Sequence analysis of the dominant labeled fragment indicated the facile cleavage of label during Edman degradation but identified two peptides, both derived from the extreme carboxyl terminus of the steroid-binding domain. The 17 residues of one peptide were fully conserved in all estrogen receptors. This fragment contained five nucleophilic amino acids and was considered as the more favored interaction site for tamoxifen aziridine. A corresponding region of the glucocorticoid receptor has recently been identified as one of three major contact sites for glucocorticoids (Carlstedt-Duke, J., Str?mstedt, P.-E., Persson, B., Cederlund, E., Gustafsson, J.-A., and J?rnvall, H. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 6842-6846). A comparison of amino acid physical characteristics in the hormone-binding domains of human estrogen and glucocorticoid receptors demonstrated an excellent structural correlation between the two regions and delineated elements in the estrogen receptor which may be directly involved in estradiol binding.     

Multiple ramp domains are required for generation of amylin receptor phenotype from the calcitonin receptor gene product

Calcitonin (CT), calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), amylin, and adrenomedullin constitute a family of structurally related peptides that signal via either the calcitonin receptor-like receptor or the CT receptor, with receptor phenotype determined by coexpression of one of the three receptor activity-modifying proteins (RAMPs). The nature of the interaction between the receptor and RAMP was investigated using chimeras between RAMP1 and RAMP2 where the amino-terminal domain of RAMP1 was attached to the transmembrane domain and carboxy terminus of RAMP2 and called RAMP1/2, and vice versa for RAMP2/1. Cotransfection of wild-type or chimeric RAMPs with the insert-negative isoform of the human CT receptor (hCTR(I1-)) into COS-7 cells resulted in the expression of (125)I-rat amylin binding sites. Highest specific binding was observed when either RAMP1 or RAMP2/1 were cotransfected, indicating the importance of the RAMP transmembrane domain and/or carboxy terminus for the degree to which amylin receptors are expressed. In contrast, the phenotype generated was primarily determined by the amino terminus, with similar RAMP1- and RAMP1/2-induced receptor phenotypes that had higher affinity for human CGRPalpha and lower affinity for human calcitonin than the RAMP2- and RAMP2/1-induced receptors.     

Structural domains of the insulin receptor and IGF receptor required for dimerisation and ligand binding

We investigated structural requirements for dimerisation and ligand binding of insulin/IGF receptors. Soluble receptor fragments consisting of N-terminal domains (L1/CYS/L2, L1/CYS/L2/F0) or fibronectin domains (F0/F1/F2, F1/F2) were expressed in CHO cells. Fragments containing F0 or F1 domains were secreted as disulphide-linked dimers, and those consisting of L1/CYS/L2 domains as monomers. None of these proteins bound ligand. However, when a peptide of 16 amino acids from the alpha-subunit C-terminus was fused to the C-terminus of L1/CYS/L2, the monomeric insulin and IGF receptor constructs bound their respective ligands with affinity only 10-fold lower than native receptors.     

Identification of cysteine 530 as the covalent attachment site of an affinity-labeling estrogen (ketononestrol aziridine) and antiestrogen (tamoxifen aziridine) in the human estrogen receptor

Radiosequence analysis of peptide fragments of the estrogen receptor (ER) from MCF-7 human breast cancer cells has been used to identify cysteine 530 as the site of covalent attachment of an estrogenic affinity label, ketononestrol aziridine (KNA), and an antiestrogenic affinity label, tamoxifen aziridine (TAZ). ER from MCF-7 cells was covalently labeled with [3H]TAZ or [3H]KNA and purified to greater than 95% homogeneity by immunoadsorbent chromatography. Limit digest peptide fragments, generated by prolonged exposure of the labeled receptor to trypsin, cyanogen bromide, or Staphylococcus aureus V8 protease, were purified to homogeneity by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and the position of the labeled residue was determined by sequential Edman degradation. With both aziridines, the labeled residue was at position 1 in the tryptic peptide, position 2 in the cyanogen bromide peptide, and position 7 in the V8 protease peptide. This localizes the site of labeling to a single cysteine at position 530 in the receptor sequence. The identity of cysteine as the site of labeling was confirmed by HPLC comparison of the TAZ-labeled amino acid (as the phenylthiohydantoin and phenylthiocarbamyl derivatives) and the KNA-labeled amino acid (as the phenylthiocarbamyl derivative) with authentic standards prepared by total synthesis. Cysteine 530 is located in the hormone binding domain of the receptor, near its carboxyl terminus. This location is consistent with earlier studies using sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis to analyze the size of the proteolytic fragments containing the covalent labeling sites for TAZ and KNA and the antigen recognition sites for monoclonal antibodies. The fact that both the estrogenic and antiestrogenic affinity labeling agents react covalently with the same cysteine indicates that differences in receptor-agonist and receptor-antagonist complexes do not result in differential covalent labeling of amino acid residues in the hormone binding domain.     

The C-terminal nonapeptide of mature chemerin activates the chemerin receptor with low nanomolar potency

Chemerin is a novel protein identified as the natural ligand of ChemR23 (chemerinR), a previously orphan G protein-coupled receptor expressed in immature dendritic cells and macrophages. Chemerin is synthesized as a secreted precursor, prochemerin, which is poorly active, but converted into a full agonist of chemerinR by proteolytic removal of the last six amino acids. In the present work, we have synthesized a number of peptides derived from the C-terminal domain of human prochemerin and have investigated their functional properties as agonists or antagonists of human chemerinR. We found that the nonapeptide (149)YFPGQFAFS(157) (chemerin-9), corresponding to the C terminus of processed chemerin, retained most of the activity of the full-size protein, with regard to agonism toward the chemerinR. Extension of this peptide at its N terminus did not increase the activity, whereas further truncations rapidly resulted in inactive compounds. The C-terminal end of the peptide appeared crucial for its activity, as addition of a single amino acid or removal of two amino acids modified the potency by four orders of magnitude. Alanine-scanning mutagenesis identified residues Tyr(149), Phe(150), Gly(152), Phe(154), and Phe(156) as the key positions for chemerinR activation. A modified peptide (YHSFFFPGQFAFS) was synthesized and iodinated, and a radioligand binding assay was established. It was found that the ability of the various peptides to activate the chemerin receptor was strictly correlated with their affinity in the binding assay. These results confirm that a precise C-terminal processing is required for the generation of a chemerinR agonist. The possibility to restrict a medium sized protein to a nonapeptide, while keeping a low nanomolar affinity for its receptor is unusual among G protein-coupled receptors ligands. The identification of these short bioactive peptides will considerably accelerate the pharmacological analysis of chemerin-chemerinR interactions.     

Mutation of the high cysteine region of the human insulin receptor alpha-subunit increases insulin receptor binding affinity and transmembrane signaling

Our previous studies indicated that amino acid residues 240-250 in the cysteine-rich region of the human insulin receptor alpha-subunit constitute a site in which insulin binds (Yip, C. C., Hsu, H., Patel, R. G., Hawley, D. M., Maddux, B. A., and Goldfine, I. D. (1988) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 157, 321-329). We have now constructed a human insulin receptor mutant in which 3 residues in this sequence were altered (Thr-Cys-Pro-Pro-Pro-Tyr-Tyr-His-Phe-Gln-Asp to Thr-Cys-Pro-Arg-Arg-Tyr-Tyr-Asp-Phe-Gln-Asp) and have expressed this mutant in rat hepatoma (HTC) cells. When compared with cells transfected with normal insulin receptors, cells transfected with mutant receptors had an increase in insulin-binding affinity and a decrease in the dissociation of bound 125I-insulin. Studies using solubilized receptors also demonstrated that mutant receptors had a higher binding affinity than normal receptors. In contrast, cells transfected with either mutant or normal receptors bound monoclonal antibodies against the receptor alpha-subunit with equal affinity. When receptor tyrosine kinase activity and alpha-aminoisobutyric acid uptake were measured, cells transfected with mutant insulin receptors were more sensitive to insulin than cells transfected with normal receptors. These findings lend further support therefore to the hypothesis that amino acid sequence 240-250 of the human insulin receptor alpha-subunit constitutes one site that interacts with insulin, and they indicate that mutations in this site can influence insulin receptor binding and transmembrane signaling.