Association of XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism with bladder cancer susceptibility: A meta-analysis

Genetic variations in DNA repair genes are thought to modify DNA repair capacity and may to be related to cancer susceptibility. However, epidemiological study results have been inconsistent. In this meta-analysis, we assessed 24 case–control studies of association between the X-ray repair cross complementing group 1 (XRCC1) Arg399Gln polymorphism and bladder cancer susceptibility in the general population and in Asian and non-Asian subgroups. A moderately significant association with bladder cancer risk was found for AG vs GG (OR = 1.110, 95% CI = 1.018–1.210). No significant associations with bladder cancer risk were found for AA vs GG (OR = 0.942, 95% CI = 0.823–1.077), the dominant model AA/AG vs GG (OR = 1.075, 95% CI = 0.990–1.167) and the recessive model AA vs AG/GG(OR = 0.890, 95% CI = 0.788–1.005). In subgroup analysis, a moderately significant association was also found for AG vs GG (OR = 1.091, 95% CI = 1.008–1.180) in non-Asian subgroup. The analysis suggests that the XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism might be a moderate risk factor for bladder cancer, especially in non-Asian population.     

Association between MTHFR C677T polymorphism and primary open-angle glaucoma: A meta-analysis

Epidemiological studies have evaluated the association between methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T polymorphism and primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) risk. However, the results remain conflicting. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between MTHFRC677T polymorphism and POAG risk. All genetic association studies on MTHFR C677T polymorphism and POAG were systematically searched by the electronic databases PubMed, Embase and Web of Science. Study selection, data abstraction and study quality evaluation were conducted in duplicate independently. The strength of association between MTHFR C677T polymorphism and POAG was measured by odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Publication bias was tested by Begg's funnel plot and Egger's regression test. A total of 10 studies including 1224 cases and 1105 controls were included in our final meta-analysis. There was no evidence of significant association of the overall population (for allelic model: OR = 1.17, 95% CI = 0.94–1.46; for additive model: OR = 1.15, 95% CI = 0.85–1.57; for dominant model: OR = 1.19, 95% CI = 0.92–1.55 and for recessive model: OR = 1.11, 95% CI = 0.83–1.49). Significant associations were found between MTHFR C677T polymorphisms and POAG in allelic model (OR = 1.39, 95% CI = 1.05–1.83) and additive model (OR = 1.88, 95% CI = 1.04–3.43) for population-based (PB) subgroup. This meta-analysis suggested that there were significant associations between MTHFR C677T polymorphism and POAG in allelic model and additive model for PB subgroup which indicated that the T allele or TT genotype might increase the risk of POAG, whereas no evidence of significant association was shown of the overall studied population. However, this conclusion should be interpreted cautiously. More large sample-size and multi-ethnicity studies with well-defined POAG patients and well-study design are needed in the future study.     

Poly (AT) deletion/insertion polymorphism of the XPC gene contributes to urinary system cancer susceptibility: A meta-analysis

Numerous studies have investigated the association between xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group C (XPC) poly (AT) deletion/insertion (PAT −/+) polymorphism and cancer susceptibility; however, the findings are inconsistent. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis based on 32 publications including 10,214 cases and 11,302 controls to acquire a more robust estimation of the relationship. We searched publications from MEDLINE, EMBASE and CBM which assessed the associations between XPC PAT −/+ polymorphism and cancer risk. We calculated pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) by using either fixed-effects or random-effects model. We found that individuals carrying the PAT +/+ genotype have significantly increased cancer risk (PAT +/+ vs. PAT −/−: OR = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.03–1.35 and recessive model: OR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.06–1.33). Further stratification analysis showed a significantly increased risk for prostate cancer (PAT +/+ vs. PAT −/−: OR = 2.20, 95% CI = 1.39–3.48, recessive model: OR = 2.07, 95% CI = 1.33–3.23 and PAT + vs. PAT −: OR = 1.39, 95% CI = 1.12–1.71), bladder cancer (recessive model: OR = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.03–1.72), Caucasian ethnicity (recessive model: OR = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.02–1.43), population-based studies (recessive model: OR = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.05–1.43) and studies with relatively large sample size (PAT +/+ vs. PAT −/−: OR = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.04–1.35 and recessive model: OR = 1.20, 95% CI = 1.08–1.33). Despite some limitations, this meta-analysis established solid statistical evidence for the association between the XPC PAT +/+ genotype and cancer risk, especially for urinary system cancer, but this association warrants further validation in single large studies.     

Association between the XRCC3 T241M polymorphism and risk of cancer: Evidence from 157 case–control studies

The T241M polymorphism in the X-ray cross-complementing group 3 (XRCC3) had been implicated in cancer susceptibility. The previous published data on the association between XRCC3 T241M polymorphism and cancer risk remained controversial. Hence, we performed a meta-analysis to investigate the association between cancer susceptibility and XRCC3 T241M (61,861 cases and 84,584 controls from 157 studies) polymorphism in different inheritance models. We used odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals to assess the strength of the association. Overall, significantly increased cancer risk was observed in any genetic model (dominant model: odds ration [OR] = 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.00–1.13; recessive model: OR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.08–1.23; additive model: OR = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.08–1.28) when all eligible studies were pooled into the meta-analysis. In further stratified and sensitivity analyses, the elevated risk remained for subgroups of bladder cancer and breast cancer, especially in Caucasians. In addition, significantly decreased lung cancer risk was also observed. In summary, this meta-analysis suggests the participation of XRCC3 T241M in the susceptibility for bladder cancer and breast cancer, especially in Caucasians, and XRCC3 T241M polymorphism is associated with decreased lung cancer risk. Moreover, our work also points out the importance of new studies for T241M association in some cancer types, such as gastric cancer, colorectal cancer, and melanoma skin cancer, where at least some of the covariates responsible for heterogeneity could be controlled, to obtain a more conclusive understanding about the function of the XRCC3 polymorphism in cancer development.     

Association between the CYP1A1 T3801C polymorphism and risk of cancer: Evidence from 268 case–control studies

T3801C is a common polymorphism in CYP1A1, showing differences in its biological functions. Case–control studies have been performed to elucidate the role of T3801C in cancer, although the results are conflicting and heterogeneous. Hence, we performed a meta-analysis to investigate the association between cancer susceptibility and T3801C (55,963 cases and 76,631 controls from 268 studies) polymorphism in different inheritance models. We used odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals to assess the strength of the association. Overall, significantly increased cancer risk was observed in any genetic model (dominant model: odds ratio [OR] = 1.14, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.09–1.19; recessive model: OR = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.12–1.34; CC vs. TT: OR = 1.31, 95% CI = 1.19–1.45; TC vs. TT: OR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.07–1.18; additive model: OR = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.09–1.19) when all eligible studies were pooled into the meta-analysis. In further stratified and sensitivity analyses, the elevated risk remained for subgroups of cervical cancer, head and neck cancer, hepatocellular cancer, leukemia, lung cancer, prostate cancer and breast cancer. In addition, significantly decreased colorectal cancer risk was also observed. In summary, this meta-analysis suggests that the participation of CYP1A1 T3801C is a genetic susceptibility for some cancer types. Moreover, our work also points out the importance of new studies for T3801C association in some cancer types, such as gallbladder cancer, Asians of acute myeloid leukemia, and thyroid cancer, where at least some of the covariates responsible for heterogeneity could be controlled, to obtain a more conclusive understanding about the function of the CYP1A1 T3801C polymorphism in cancer development.     

The CXCL12 G801A polymorphism and cancer risk: Evidence from 17 case‐control studies

CXCL12 has been implicated in human carcinogenesis, but the association between the most-studied G801A polymorphism (rs1801157) and the risk of various cancers was reported with inconclusive results. The aim of this study was to assess the association between the CXCL12 G801A polymorphism and cancer risk. A meta-analysis of 17 studies with 3048 cancer patients and 4522 controls was conducted to evaluate the strength of the association using odds ratio (OR) with its 95% confidence interval (CI). The overall results showed that the variant genotypes were associated with a significantly increased risk of all cancer types (OR = 1.38, 95%CI = 1.18–1.61 for GA versus GG, and OR = 1.36, 95%CI = 1.17–1.59 for GA/AA versus GG). In the stratified analyses, there was a significantly increased risk for the studies of breast cancer (OR = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.16–2.33 for AA versus GG, OR = 1.42, 95%CI = 1.18–1.71 for GA versus GG, and OR = 1.44, 95%CI = 1.21–1.72 for GA/AA versus GG) and lung cancer (OR = 2.86, 95% CI = 1.75–4.69 for AA versus GG, OR = 1.62, 95% CI = 1.20–2.18 for GA vs. GG, OR = 1.80, 95% CI = 1.36–2.39 for GA/AA versus GG, and OR = 2.24, 95%CI = 1.41–3.57 for AA versus GA/GG), which remained for the studies of Asian populations and hospital-based control sources. Although some modest bias could not be eliminated, this meta-analysis indicates that the CXCL12 G801A polymorphism is a low-penetrance risk factor for cancer development.     

Association between interleukin-6 gene − 174 G/C polymorphism and the risk of coronary heart disease: A meta-analysis of 20 studies including 9619 cases and 10,919 controls

Interleukin-6 (IL-6) gene − 174 G/C polymorphism has been reported to be associated with coronary heart disease (CHD), but the results remain inconclusive. The present meta-analysis was therefore designed to clarify these controversies. This meta-analysis was performed by searching PubMed, Embase and Web of Science databases. A total of 20 studies including 9619 CHD cases and 10,919 controls were combined showing no evidence of association between IL-6 gene − 174 G/C polymorphism and CHD risk (for C/C + C/G vs. G/G: OR = 1.10, 95% CI = 0.99–1.22, p = 0.07; for C/C vs. C/G + G/G: OR = 1.08, 95% CI = 0.93–1.24, p = 0.33; for C/C vs. G/G: OR = 1.16, 95% CI = 0.97–1.39, p = 0.11; for C allele vs. G allele: OR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.00–1.21, p = 0.06). Moreover, we also did not find significant association between IL-6 gene − 174 G/C polymorphism and myocardial infarction (MI) risk. However, in the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, significant association was found among Asians (for C/C + C/G vs. G/G: OR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.05–1.63, p = 0.02). In summary, the present meta-analysis suggests that IL-6 gene − 174 G/C polymorphism is associated with increased CHD risk among Asians. However, due to the small subjects included in the subgroup analysis of Asians, the results should be interpreted with caution.     

Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase 677TT genotype might be associated with an increased lung cancer risk in Asians

Background

The association between methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) 677C > T polymorphism and lung cancer risk has been studied in various populations with conflicting results. The aim of this study was to assess the association strength by a meta-analysis of published studies.

Methods

We searched PubMed and Chinese Biomedical (CBM) databases for relevant literatures published by July 18, 2012. Pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated to assess the strength of the association.

Results

A total of 20 studies comprising 11,653 cases and 12,032 controls were included in the final meta-analysis. Using the random effect model, we found that MTHFR 677TT variant genotype was associated with an increased lung cancer risk (OR = 1.26, 95% CI = 1.05–1.50, P = 0.011 for TT vs. CC; OR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.03–1.37, P < 0.001 for TT vs. CC + CT; OR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.02–1.22, P = 0.017 for T allele vs. C allele). In the further stratified analyses, the increased lung cancer risk was found in Asian subjects (OR = 1.31, 95% CI = 1.01–1.71, P = 0.045 for TT vs. CC; OR = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.00–1.38, P = 0.048 for TT vs. CC + CT). There were no evidences for obvious publication bias in the overall meta-analysis and Asian subjects.

Conclusions

MTHFR 677TT genotype might increase the susceptibility of lung cancer, especially in Asians.     

Association of TLR and TREM-1 gene polymorphisms with risk of coronary artery disease in a Russian population

Atherosclerosis, manifesting itself as acute coronary syndrome, stroke, and peripheral arterial diseases, is a chronic progressive inflammatory disease which is driven by responses of both innate and adaptive immunity. Toll-like receptors (TLRs) and Triggering Receptor Expressed on Myeloid Cells-1 (TREM-1) are important effectors of the innate immune system, and polymorphisms within genes encoding them may increase risk of occurrence of various pathologies including cardiovascular disorders. Thus, we carried out a genetic association study on the sample of 702 consecutive Caucasian (Russian) patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and 300 age-, sex-, and ethnicity-matched healthy controls. We revealed that the C/C genotype of the TLR1 rs5743551 polymorphism was significantly associated with a reduced risk of CAD according to the recessive model (OR = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.20–0.84, P = 0.017, adjusted by age and gender). Concerning TREM-1 gene polymorphisms, we found that A/A genotype of the rs2234237 polymorphism, the G/G genotype of the rs6910730 polymorphism, the C/C genotype of the rs9471535 polymorphism, and the T/T genotype of the rs4711668 polymorphism were significantly associated with elevated CAD risk according to the recessive model (OR = 5.52, 95% CI = 1.17–25.98, P = 0.011; OR = 4.28, 95% CI = 1.09–16.81, P = 0.021; OR = 5.55, 95% CI = 1.18–26.09, P = 0.011, and OR = 1.66, 95% CI = 1.10–2.52, P = 0.014, respectively, adjusted by age and gender). Conversely, the G allele of the rs1817537 polymorphism, the T allele of the rs2234246 polymorphism, and the T allele of the rs3804277 polymorphism significantly correlated with similarly decreased risk of CAD according to the dominant model (OR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.40–0.81, P = 0.0013; OR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.42–0.84, P = 0.003, and OR = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.41–0.81, P = 0.0014, respectively, adjusted by age and gender). We conclude that certain TLR and TREM-1 gene polymorphisms may be associated with CAD in Russian population; however, their significance as predictive and pathogenic markers of CAD should be interpreted with caution in other populations.     

Myeloperoxidase G-463A polymorphism and susceptibility to coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis

Published data on the association between the myeloperoxidase (MPO) G-463A polymorphism and coronary artery disease (CAD) are inconclusive. To derive a more precise estimation of the relationship, a meta-analysis on this topic was performed. PubMed, EMBASE and Chinese national knowledge infrastructure were searched for studies regarding the association between the MPO G-463A polymorphism and CAD. A logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the genetic effect and the possible genetic model of action. Summary odds ratios (ORs) with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. There was strong evidence for an association between the MPO G-463A polymorphism and CAD. The genetic model of action was most likely to be co-dominant. Overall, the data showed that AA and GA genotypes were significantly associated with reduced risk of CAD (AA vs. GG: OR = 0.37, 95% CI = 0.17–0.78; GA vs. GG: OR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.57–0.92). In subgroup analyses by study population and sources of controls, statistically significant results were observed in the Chinese population (AA vs. GG: OR = 0.21, 95% CI = 0.10–0.43; GA vs. GG: OR = 0.57, 95% CI =0.44–0.74) and in hospital-based control studies (AA vs. GG: OR = 0.20, 95% CI = 0.10–0.39; GA vs. GG: OR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.48–0.77). This meta-analysis suggests that the MPO G-463A variant genotypes may be associated with decreased risk of CAD. However, given the limited number of studies and the potential biases, the influence of this polymorphism on CAD risk needs further investigation.     

Association between the − 786T>C 1polymorphism in the promoter region of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) and risk of coronary artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

A variety of studies have evaluated the association between the − 786T>C polymorphism in the promoter region of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) and risk of coronary artery disease (CAD). However, the results remain conflicting. To better understand the role of eNOS − 786T>C polymorphism in CAD risk, we conducted a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods

Case–control, cohort or cross-sectional studies evaluating the association between eNOS − 786T>C polymorphism and CAD risk were searched in electronic databases of PubMed, ISI Web of Knowledge, Medline, Embase and Google Scholar Search (up to January 2013). Overall and subgroup analyses were performed. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to evaluate the association between eNOS − 786T>C polymorphism and CAD risk. Statistical analysis was performed with Review Manager 5.0 and STATA12.0.

Results

Twenty-four studies were analyzed between 6192 CAD cases and 9281 healthy controls. The combined results of overall analysis showed significant positive associations between CAD risk and eNOS − 786T>C polymorphism in dominant model (OR = 1.45, 95% CI = 1.27–1.65), recessive model (OR = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.20–1.56), homozygote comparison (OR = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.31–2.04), heterozygote comparison (TC vs. TT, OR = 1.39, 95% CI = 1.23–1.57; CC vs. TC, OR = 1.20, 95% CI = 1.04–1.37) and allele comparison (OR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.21–1.50). On subgroup analysis based on the ethnicity of population (Caucasians, Asians and others), significant differences were found in all genetic models for Caucasians, similar associations existed in Asians except heterozygote comparison (CC vs. TC). However, the associations were only found in dominant model, heterozygote comparison (TC vs. TT) and allele comparison for the populations named others.

Conclusions

Our investigations demonstrate the significant associations between eNOS − 786C>T polymorphism and CAD risk, and this polymorphism might become an early marker for the risk evaluation of CAD.     

Effects of Pro12Ala polymorphism in peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ2 gene on metabolic syndrome risk: A meta-analysis

Background

Associations between peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ2 (PPARγ2) gene polymorphism and metabolic syndrome risk remained controversial and ambiguous. Thus, we performed a meta-analysis to assess the association between Pro12Ala polymorphism in PPARγ2 gene and metabolic syndrome susceptibility.

Methods

An electronic literature search was conducted on Medline, OVID, Cochrane Library database, and the China National Knowledge Internet up to March 2013. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to calculate the strength of association in the fixed or random effects model.

Results

Ten studies involving a total of 4456 cases and 10343 controls were included in this meta-analysis. No statistical evidence of association was found between Pro12Ala polymorphism and metabolic syndrome risk in all genetic models (homozygote model: OR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.62–1.12; heterozygote model: OR = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.94–1.14; dominant model: OR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.93–1.12; recessive model: OR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.62–1.11). No statistical evidence of significant association was observed when stratified by ethnicity, definition of metabolic syndrome, source of control groups and quality score of the selected articles. All in all, the results did not support a major role of the Pro12Ala variant of the PPARγ2 gene in metabolic syndrome risk.

Conclusions

This meta-analysis suggested that the effect of Pro12Ala polymorphism in PPARγ2 gene may not be related to metabolic syndrome as an entity. However, Pro12Ala may affect the single component of metabolic syndrome. A large, well designed study is required to more adequately assess the role for Pro12Ala polymorphism on metabolic syndrome.     

The lack of association between interleukin-6 gene − 174 G/C polymorphism and the risk of type 1 diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis of 18,152 subjects

Epidemiological studies have evaluated the association between interleukin-6 (IL-6) gene − 174 G/C polymorphism and type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) risk, but results of different studies have been inconsistent. The present meta-analysis was therefore designed to clarify these controversies. PubMed, Embase and Web of Science were searched from the first available year to March 25, 2012, as well as hand searching of the references of identified articles were performed. All studies investigating the association between IL-6 gene − 174 G/C polymorphism and T1DM risk were included. Data analyses were carried out by Review Manager 5.1.2 and Stata 11.0. Seven studies were included in the final meta-analysis, covering a total of 9697 T1DM cases and 8455 controls. The results showed no evidence for significant association between IL-6 gene − 174 G/C polymorphism and T1DM risk (for C/C + C/G vs. G/G: OR = 1.30, 95% CI = 0.84–2.00, p = 0.24; for C/C vs. C/G + G/G: OR = 1.10, 95% CI = 0.75–1.60, p = 0.63; for C/C vs. G/G: OR = 1.34, 95% CI = 0.75–2.42, p = 0.33; for C allele vs. G allele: OR = 1.16, 95% CI = 0.88–1.53, p = 0.30). In addition, the similar results were obtained in the subgroup analysis based on ethnicity. In summary, the present meta-analysis suggests that IL-6 gene − 174 G/C polymorphism is not associated with T1DM risk. However, due to the small sample size in most of the included studies and the selection bias existed in some studies, the results should be interpreted with caution.     

Association between apolipoprotein E gene polymorphism and the risk of multiple sclerosis: A meta-analysis of 6977 subjects

Epidemiological studies have evaluated the association between apolipoprotein E (ApoE) gene polymorphism and multiple sclerosis (MS) risk. However, the results remain conflicting. Therefore, in order to derive a more precise association of ApoE gene polymorphism with MS risk, we performed this meta-analysis. Systematic searches of electronic databases PubMed, Embase and Web of Science, as well as hand searching of the references of identified articles were performed. Twenty studies were identified, covering a total of 4080 MS cases and 2897 controls. The results showed evidence for significant association between ApoE ε2 mutation and MS risk (for ε2/ε4 versus ε3/ε3: OR = 1.74, 95% CI = 1.12–2.71, p = 0.01; for ε2 allele versus ε3 allele: OR = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.01–1.35, p = 0.04). In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, the similar results were obtained among Europeans (for ε2/ε4 versus ε3/ε3: OR = 1.81, 95% CI = 1.14–2.87, p = 0.01; for ε2 allele versus ε3 allele: OR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.02–1.38, p = 0.03). After excluding the outlier studies by observing Galbraith plot, marginal association was found between ApoE ε3/ε4 genotype and the protective factor for MS (for ε3/ε4 versus ε3/ε3: OR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.75–0.99, p = 0.04). In summary, the present meta-analysis provides evidence that ApoE ε2 mutation is associated with MS risk. In addition, ApoE ε3/ε4 genotype appears to be a protective factor for MS.     

Matrix metalloproteinase-1 gene polymorphisms and periodontitis susceptibility: A meta-analysis based on 11 case-control studies

Matrix metalloproteinase-1 has been implicated in periodontal disease, but the association between the most-studied Matrix metalloproteinase-1 1G-to-2G polymorphism and the risk of periodontal disease were reported with inconclusive results. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the association between the Matrix metalloproteinase-1 1G-to-2G polymorphism and periodontal disease. Electronic databases search yielded 11 studies with 1447 patients and 1710 control subjects evaluated the association of the polymorphisms of Matrix metalloproteinase-1 1G-to-2G and periodontitis risk were brought into this study. The association was evaluated by odds ratio (OR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI). The overall results showed that the variant genotypes were associated with a significantly increased risk of periodontitis (OR = 1.45, 95% CI = 1.02–1.26 for 2G/2G vs 1G/1G, and OR = 2.27, 95% CI = 1.22–4.23 for 2G/2G vs 1G/2G + 1G/1G). In the stratified analyses, there was a significantly increased risk for the studies of periodontitis (OR = 1.59, 95% CI = 1.15–2.21 for 2G/2G vs 1G/1G; OR = 3.48, 95% CI = 1.39–8.71 for 2G/2G vs 1G/2G + 1G/1G), which remained for the studies of Asian populations. And there was a significantly increased risk of severe periodontitis (OR = 2.15, 95% CI = 1.35–3.43 for 2G/2G vs 1G/1G; OR = 2.86, 95% CI = 1.31–2.64 for 2G/2G vs 1G/2G + 1G/1G; OR = 1.6, 95% CI = 1.12–2.39 for 1G/2G + 2G/2G vs 1G/1G; OR = 1.61, 95% CI = 1.28–2.03 for 2G allele vs 1G allele). The current study demonstrated that the Matrix metalloproteinase-1-1607 1G-to-2G polymorphism was associated with susceptibility to periodontitis, apparently, severe periodontitis.     

Association of interleukin-13 SNP rs20541 with allergic rhinitis risk: A meta-analysis

Studies investigating the association between interleukin-13 (IL-13) single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs20541 and allergic rhinitis (AR) risk have reported conflicting results. The aim of the present study was to conduct a meta-analysis assessing the possible association of IL-13 SNP rs20541 with AR risk. Eight studies were included in the present meta-analysis (2153 cases and 3931 controls). The combined results based on all studies showed that IL-13 SNP rs20541 was associated with increased AR risk (Gln versus Arg: odds ratio (OR) = 1.18, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.08–1.30; Gln/Gln versus Arg/Arg: OR = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.20–1.92; Arg/Gln + Gln/Gln versus Arg/Arg: OR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.06–1.33; Gln/Gln versus Arg/Gln + Arg/Arg: OR = 1.42, 95% CI = 1.13–1.79). When stratifying for race, IL-13 SNP rs20541 exhibited increased AR risk in Asians (Gln versus Arg: OR = 1.20, 95% CI = 1.06–1.36; Gln/Gln versus Arg/Arg: OR = 1.57, 95% CI = 1.17–2.12; Arg/Gln + Gln/Gln versus Arg/Arg: OR = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.04–1.44; Gln/Gln versus Arg/Gln + Arg/Arg: OR = 1.45, 95% CI = 1.09–1.93), while no significant association was detected in Caucasians (Gln versus Arg: OR = 1.28, 95% CI = 0.93 ~ 1.78; Gln/Gln versus Arg/Arg: OR = 1.42, 95% CI = 0.96–2.11; Arg/Gln + Gln/Gln versus Arg/Arg: OR = 1.35, 95% CI = 0.89–2.05; Gln/Gln versus Arg/Gln + Arg/Arg: OR = 1.37, 95% CI = 0.93–2.02). This meta-analysis supported that IL-13 SNP rs20541 was associated with AR, particularly in Asians.     

The Hsa-miR-27a rs895819 (A > G) polymorphism and cancer susceptibility

Published data on the association between the rs895819 (A > G) polymorphism in the terminal loop of pre-miR-27a and cancer risk is inconclusive. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to estimate the association between this polymorphism and cancer. The PubMed, Web of science, and Embase databases were searched for articles on the hsa-miR-27a rs895819 polymorphism and cancer risk published up to November 24, 2012. The genotype data obtained in the searches were pooled in our meta-analysis, and pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to assess the association. Seven studies with a total of 3849 cases and 4781 controls were eligible for analysis. Overall, we found no significant associations between the hsa-miR-27a rs895819 (A > G) polymorphism and cancer susceptibility (homozygote model: OR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.68–1.14; heterozygote model: OR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.79–1.17; dominant model: OR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.79–1.12; recessive model: OR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.69–1.12). In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, we found that the rs895819 AG genotype was associated with a decreased risk of cancer in white individuals (dominant model: OR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.76–0.94; heterozygote model: OR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.75–0.94). This meta-analysis indicated that the hsa-miR-27a rs895819 polymorphism did not correlate with overall cancer risk in the general population. However, the rs895819 AG genotype may protect against the development of cancer in white individuals. Larger, better studies of homogeneous cancer patients are needed to further assess the correlation between this polymorphism and cancer risk.     

Hsa-miR-499 polymorphism (rs3746444) and cancer risk: A meta-analysis of 17 case–control studies

Introduction

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a family of endogenous, small and noncoding RNAs that negatively regulate gene expression by suppressing translation or degrading mRNAs. Recently, many studies investigated the association between hsa-miR-499 rs3746444 polymorphism and cancer risk, which showed inconclusive results.

Methodology/main results

We conducted a meta-analysis of 17 studies that included 7842 cancer cases and 8989 case-free controls and assessed the strength of the association, using odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Overall, hsa-miR-499 rs3746444 polymorphism was associated with higher cancer risk in heterozygote model (AG vs AA, OR = 1.15, 95%CI = 1.01–1.30, P_{heterogeneity} < 0.001), dominant genetic model (GG/AG vs AA, OR = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.04–1.33, P_{heterogeneity} < 0.001) and allele contrast (G vs A, OR = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.01–1.18, P_{heterogeneity} = 0.021). In the stratified analyses, we observed that the GG/AG genotype might modulate breast cancer risk (OR = 1.13, 95% CI = 1.01–1.26, P_{heterogeneity} = 0.111) comparing with the AA genotype. Moreover, a significantly increased risk was found among Asian populations in heterozygote model (AG vs AA, OR = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.06–1.43, P_{heterogeneity} < 0.001), homozygote model (GG vs AA, OR = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.02–1.46, P_{heterogeneity} = 0.319), dominant model (GG/AG vs AA, OR = 1.25, 95% CI = 1.06–1.39, P_{heterogeneity} < 0.001) and allele contrast (G vs A, OR = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.04–1.25, P_{heterogeneity} = 0.021).

Conclusions

These findings supported that hsa-miR-499 rs3746444 polymorphism contributes to the susceptibility of cancers.     

The effect of XPD/ERCC2 Lys751Gln polymorphism on acute leukemia risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Aims

Epidemiological studies have assessed the association between xeroderma pigmentosum group D (XPD) Lys751Gln and acute leukemia risk with conflicting results. We performed this meta-analysis to derive a more precise estimation of the relationship. Pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was used to assess the strength of the association.

Results

Ten published case–control studies including a total of 1494 cases and 2259 controls were identified. Overall, significant risk effects of Lys751Gln genotype was found under the dominant model (OR = 1.16; 95% CI = 1.01–1.34; P = 0.032). When stratified by clinical types, the variant genotype was associated with the acute myeloid leukemia (AML) risk under the heterozygote comparison (OR = 1.20; 95% CI = 1.00–1.43; P = 0.048), the homozygote comparison (OR = 1.35; 95% CI = 1.05–1.74; P = 0.019) and the dominant model (OR = 1.23; 95% CI = 1.04–1.45; P = 0.015), respectively. Furthermore, significantly increased risks were also pronounced in Caucasian AML patients (the homozygote comparison: OR = 1.38; 95% CI = 1.07–1.78; P = 0.013; the dominant model: OR = 1.23; 95% CI = 1.03–1.46; P = 0.020; and the recessive model: OR = 1.26; 95% CI = 1.00–1.60; P = 0.050). No evident heterogeneities were observed for the overall data under all genetic models. In addition, no statistical evidence for publication bias was found using the method of Begg's and Egger's tests.

Conclusion

This meta-analysis suggested that XPD Lys751Gln polymorphism might be a risk factor for AML and Caucasian acute leukemia patients.     

Influence of interleukin-6 gene − 174G>C polymorphism on development of atherosclerosis: A meta-analysis of 50 studies involving 33,514 subjects

Increasing epidemiological studies have focused on the associations between interleukin-6 (IL-6) gene − 174G>C polymorphism and atherosclerotic diseases, but the results are still controversial. This meta-analysis was designed to identify whether this association exists. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane database, Clinicaltrials.gov and Current Controlled Trials, Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, CBMdisc, CNKI and Google Scholar were searched to get the genetic association studies. The crude odds ratios (ORs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to estimate the association between the IL-6 gene − 174G>C polymorphism and atherosclerosis ( AS ) risk. The subgroup analyses were made on the following: ethnicity, atherosclerotic diseases and source of controls. Finally, 50 studies (15,029 cases and 18,485 controls) were included in this meta-analysis. Overall, no significant association was found between the IL-6 gene − 174G>C polymorphism and AS risk (for C allele vs. G allele: OR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.94–1.11, p = 0.64; for C/C vs. G/G: OR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.85–1.21, p = 0.88; for C/C vs. C/G + G/G: OR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.84–1.12, p = 0.68; for C/C + C/G vs. G/G: OR = 1.07, 95% CI = 0.97–1.17, p = 0.18). In the subgroup analyses, significant associations were found between the IL-6 gene − 174G>C polymorphism and AS in non-Caucasian group (for CC + CG vs. GG: OR = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.06–1.41, p = 0.005), other atherosclerotic diseases group (for C allele vs. G allele: OR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.61–0.93, p = 0.008; for C/C vs. G/G: OR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.38–0.81, p = 0.002; for C/C vs. C/G + G/G: OR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.45–0.79, p = 0.0004) and population-based group (for C allele vs. G allele: OR = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.00–1.18, p = 0.04; for CC + CG vs. GG: OR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.04–1.27, p = 0.005). In summary, the present meta-analysis suggests that the IL-6 gene − 174G C polymorphism is associated with the susceptibility to AS. However, due to the high heterogeneity in the meta-analysis, the results should be interpreted with caution.