Association between MTR A2756G and MTRR A66G polymorphisms and maternal risk for neural tube defects: A meta-analysis

Background

Methionine synthase (MTR) and methionine synthase reductase (MTRR) genes have been considered to be implicated in the development of neural tube defects (NTDs). However, the results are inconsistent. Accordingly, we conducted a meta-analysis to further investigate such an association.

Methods

Published literature from PubMed and Embase databases was retrieved. All studies evaluating the association between MTR A2756G or MTRR A66G polymorphism and maternal risk for NTDs were included. Pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated using the fixed- or random-effects model.

Results

A total of 11 studies (1005 cases and 2098 controls) on MTR A2756G polymorphism and 10 studies (1211 cases and 2003 controls) on MTRR A66G polymorphism were included. Overall, this meta-analysis revealed no significant association between maternal MTR A2756G polymorphism and NTD susceptibility in either genetic model. A significant association between MTRR A66G polymorphism and maternal risk for NTDs was observed for GG vs. AA (OR = 1.31, 95% CI 1.03–1.67) among Caucasians.

Conclusion

The present meta-analysis indicated that MTRR A66G polymorphism, but not MTR A2756G, is significantly associated with maternal risk for NTDs in Caucasians.     

Lack of Association between Methionine Synthase A2756G Polymorphism and Digestive System Cancer Risk: Evidence from 39327 Subjects

Background

Polymorphisms in genes involved in the metabolism of folate and methyl groups have been implicated with risk of digestive system cancer. Methionine synthase (MTR) plays a central role in folate metabolism, thereby affecting DNA methylation. The association between A2756G polymorphism (rs1805087) in MTR and digestive system cancer susceptibility was inconsistent in previous studies. To investigate this inconsistency, we performed this meta-analysis.

Methods

Databases including Pubmed, EMBASE, ISI Web of Science and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) were searched to find relevant studies. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the strength of association. Potential sources of heterogeneity were also assessed by subgroup analysis and meta-regression.

Results

A total of 29 articles with 15,368 patients and 23,959 controls were included. We found no association between MTR A2756G polymorphism and digestive system cancer in overall population (G allele: OR = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.98–1.09, P = 0.25; dominant model: OR = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.97–1.10, P = 0.33; recessive model: OR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.89–1.17, P = 0.79). In the stratified analyses according to cancer type, sample size and genotyping method, no evidence of any gene-disease association was obtained in almost all genetic models. However, marginal significant associations were found for East Asians and hospital-based studies.

Conclusions

This meta-analysis suggests that there is no significant association between the MTR A2756G polymorphism and digestive system cancer risk.     

The XRCC1 Arg280His polymorphism contributes to cancer susceptibility: an update by meta-analysis of 53 individual studies

The X-ray repair cross-complementing group 1 (XRCC1) protein plays a central role in DNA repair pathways. Epidemiological studies have revealed the association between XRCC1 Arg280His polymorphism and cancer risk, but the results were inconsistent. We conducted this meta-analysis to assess the effect of XRCC1 Arg280His polymorphism on cancer susceptibility with accumulated data. Up to January 2012, 53 case‐control studies with 21,349 cases and 23,649 controls were available for our study. Summary odds ratios (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for XRCC1 Arg280His polymorphism and cancer were estimated using fixed‐ or random-effects models when appropriate. Our meta-analysis identified that elevated cancer risk was statistically associated with the minor variant His allele and Arg–His/His–His genotypes both in the overall population (allele comparison, His versus Arg: OR = 1.16; 95% CI: 1.08–1.25; dominant comparison, Arg–His/His–His versus Arg–Arg: OR = 1.17; 95% CI: 1.08–1.27) and in terms of subgroup analyses by ethnicity for both Caucasians and non‐Caucasians. However, no significant result was observed in the stratified analysis by cancer type. Moreover, significantly increased cancer risk was observed in smokers. These findings indicated that XRCC1 Arg280His polymorphism may play a role in cancer development.     

Cyclin D1 G870A polymorphism and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis comprising 9,911 cases and 11,171 controls

Cyclin D1 represents a key molecule in the regulation of cell cycle. CCND1 G870A (rs603965) polymorphism has drawn considerable attention as the A allele may generate a variant splice product with possible oncogenic actions. A meta-analysis examining the association between CCND1 G870A polymorphism and breast cancer risk was performed. Separate analyses on Caucasian and Chinese populations were also implemented. Eligible articles were identified for the period up to July 2010. Pooled odds ratios (OR) were appropriately derived from fixed-effects or random-effects models. Sensitivity analysis excluding studies whose genotype frequencies in controls significantly deviated from Hardy–Weinberg Equilibrium (HWE) was performed. Nine case–control studies on Caucasians (7,304 cases and 8,149 controls) and four case–control studies on Chinese (2,607 cases and 3,022 controls) were eligible. At the overall analysis the A allele seemed to be associated with elevated breast cancer risk; the effect seemed to be confined to homozygous carriers (pooled OR = 1.091, 95% CI: 1.008–1.179, P = 0.030, fixed effects) as heterozygous carriers did not exhibit significantly elevated breast cancer risk. No statistically significant associations were demonstrated in Caucasians. On the other hand, Chinese AA carriers exhibited marginally elevated breast cancer risk (pooled OR = 1.144, 95% CI: 0.984–1.329, P = 0.080, fixed effects). Nevertheless, the controls in two out of the four Chinese studies deviated from HWE. In conclusion, this meta-analysis suggests that the A allele of the CCND1 G870A polymorphism may confer additional breast cancer risk when it comes to homozygosity and Chinese populations. The need for additional, methodologically sound studies on Chinese populations seems warranted.     

The polymorphisms in methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase, methionine synthase, methionine synthase reductase, and the risk of colorectal cancer

Polymorphisms in genes involved in folate metabolism may modulate the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC), but data from published studies are conflicting. The current meta-analysis was performed to address a more accurate estimation. A total of 41 (17,552 cases and 26,238 controls), 24(8,263 cases and 12,033 controls), 12(3,758 cases and 5,646 controls), and 13 (5,511 cases and 7,265 controls) studies were finally included for the association between methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T and A1289C, methione synthase reductase (MTRR) A66G, methionine synthase (MTR) A2756G polymorphisms and the risk of CRC, respectively. The data showed that the MTHFR 677T allele was significantly associated with reduced risk of CRC (OR = 0.93, 95%CI 0.90-0.96), while the MTRR 66G allele was significantly associated with increased risk of CRC (OR = 1.11, 95%CI 1.01-1.18). Sub-group analysis by ethnicity revealed that MTHFR C677T polymorphism was significantly associated with reduced risk of CRC in Asians (OR = 0.80, 95%CI 0.72-0.89) and Caucasians (OR = 0.84, 95%CI 0.76-0.93) in recessive genetic model, while the MTRR 66GG genotype was found to significantly increase the risk of CRC in Caucasians (GG vs. AA: OR = 1.18, 95%CI 1.03-1.36). No significant association was found between MTHFR A1298C and MTR A2756G polymorphisms and the risk of CRC. Cumulative meta-analysis showed no particular time trend existed in the summary estimate. Probability of publication bias was low across all comparisons illustrated by the funnel plots and Egger's test. Collectively, this meta-analysis suggested that MTHFR 677T allele might provide protection against CRC in worldwide populations, while MTRR 66G allele might increase the risk of CRC in Caucasians. Since potential confounders could not be ruled out completely, further studies were needed to confirm these results.     

Methionine Synthase A2756G Polymorphism and Risk of Colorectal Adenoma and Cancer: Evidence Based on 27 Studies

Methionine synthase (MTR), which plays a central role in maintaining adequate intracellular folate, methionine and normal homocysteine concentrations, was thought to be involved in the development of colorectal cancer (CRC) and colorectal adenoma (CRA) by affecting DNA methylation. However, studies on the association between MTR A2756G polymorphism and CRC/CRA remain conflicting. We conducted a meta-analysis of 27 studies, including 13465 cases and 20430 controls for CRC, and 4844 cases and 11743 controls for CRA. Potential sources of heterogeneity and publication bias were also systematically explored. Overall, the summary odds ratio of G variant for CRC was 1.03 (95% CI: 0.96–1.09) and 1.05 (95% CI: 0.99–1.12) for CRA. No significant results were observed in heterozygous and homozygous when compared with wild genotype for these polymorphisms. In the stratified analyses according to ethnicity, source of controls, sample size, sex, and tumor site, no evidence of any gene-disease association was obtained. Results from the meta-analysis of four studies on MTR stratified according to smoking and alcohol drinking status showed an increased CRC risk in heavy smokers (OR = 2.06, 95% CI: 1.32–3.20) and heavy drinkers (OR = 2.00, 95% CI: 1.28–3.09) for G allele carriers. This meta-analysis suggests that the MTR A2756G polymorphism is not associated with CRC/CRA susceptibility and that gene-environment interaction may exist.     

Current evidence on the relationship between five polymorphisms in the matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) gene and lung cancer risk: A meta-analysis

Purpose

Matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) 1, MMP2, MMP3 and MMP9 are important members of the MMP family. Recently, many studies have been carried out on the association between polymorphisms of MMP1-1607 1G/2G, MMP2-735 C/T, MMP2-1306 C/T, MMP3-1171 5A/6A and MMP9-1562 C/T and lung cancer risk. However the results of these studies remained inconclusive due to conflicting results from different case–control studies. To clarify these associations, we conducted a meta-analysis.

Methods

We conducted a comprehensive search in Medline, EMBASE, OVID and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (date from Jan 2000 to Aug 2012). Overall and subgroup analysis by the ethnicity of study population was carried out. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (95%CI) was used to assess the strength of the association.

Results

There were 17 studies involving five polymorphic sites in four MMP genes. For MMP1-1607,increased lung cancer risk was found under dominant model (MMP1-1607 1G/2G: OR = 1.14, 95%CI = 1.03–1.26, P = 0.01), but not in the Caucasian population. For MMP2-1306 C/T, T polymorphism decreased lung cancer risk under dominant and recessive models (dominant, OR = 0.63, 95%CI = 0.46–0.88, P = 0.0006; recessive, OR = 0.61, 95%CI = 0.38–0.99, P = 0.04). For MMP9-1562 C/T, TT genotype decreased this risk under the recessive model (OR = 0.38, 95%CI = 0.19–0.75, P = 0.005), but not in the Asian population. For MMP2-735 C/T and MMP3-1171 5A/6A, there was no association between this polymorphism and lung cancer risk under the dominant and recessive models.

Conclusions

MMP1-1607 1G/2G polymorphism increased lung cancer risk in Asians. It was also found thatMMP2-1306 C/T polymorphism decreased lung cancer risk in Asians, while MMP9-1562 C/T polymorphism decreased lung cancer risk in Caucasians. No significant difference was found in any genotype of MMP2-735 C/T and MMP3-1171 5A/6A. Further studies with larger sample sizes should be carried out.     

Estrogen receptor-alpha gene PvuII (T/C) and XbaI (A/G) polymorphisms and endometriosis risk: A meta-analysis

Estrogen receptor-alpha (ER-α) polymorphisms have been hypothesized to be associated with the risk of endometriosis (EMT) development by many epidemiological studies, however, the available results were conflicting. To derive a more precise estimation of association between the ER-α PvuII (T/C) and XbaI (A/G) polymorphisms and risk of EMT, we performed a meta-analysis. Summary odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for ER-α polymorphisms and EMT were calculated in a fixed-effects model and a random-effects model when appropriate. This meta-analysis included 20 case-control studies with 1752 cases and 1742 controls for PvuII polymorphism and 15 case-control studies with 1349 cases and 1411 controls for XbaI polymorphism. For PvuII T/C polymorphism, no obvious associations were found for all genetic models when all studies were pooled into the meta-analysis. In the subgroup analyses by ethnicity, country, HWE in controls and study sample size, a significantly increased risk was observed among Caucasians (recessive model, OR=2.56, 95% CI=1.06-6.16) and among studies without the HWE (recessive model, OR=1.85, 95% CI=1.20-2.84). For XbaI A/G polymorphism, also no obvious associations were found for all genetic models. In the subgroup analyses by ethnicity, country, HWE in controls and study sample size, still no obvious associations were found. No publication bias was found in the present study. This meta-analysis suggests that ER-α gene PvuII (T/C) and XbaI (A/G) polymorphisms may not be associated with EMT risk, while the observed increase in risk of EMT may be due to small-study bias.     

Does cytochrome P450 1A1 MspI polymorphism increase acute lymphoblastic leukemia risk? Evidence from 2013 cases and 2903 controls

Previous studies indicated that cytochrome P450 1A1 (CYP1A1) MspI polymorphism might be a possible risk factor for several malignancies. Increasing investigations have been conducted on the association of CYP1A1 MspI polymorphisms with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). However, the results were controversial. The goal of the present study was to address this controversy by pooling and analyzing the published data. Therefore, quantitative meta-analyses evaluating the association of CYP1A1 MspI variation with ALL were performed and subgroup analyses on ethnicity, age groups and source of controls were further carried out. After a rigorous search in the Medline, EMBASE, OVID, ScienceDirect, and CNKI databases, all eligible studies for the period up to May 2012 were identified and screened according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Consequently, a total of fourteen case–control studies including 2013 cases and 2903 controls were selected for analysis. The overall data indicated a significant association of CYP1A1 MspI polymorphism with ALL risk (CC + TC vs TT: OR = 1.33; 95%CI = 1.05–1.69). In a subgroup analysis according to ethnicity, no associations were shown among Asians, Caucasians and Mixed ethnicity subgroups. In the subgroup analysis regarding age groups, increased risk was observed in the childhood ALL subgroup (C vs T: OR = 1.23; 95%CI = 1.04–1.45; CC + TC vs TT: OR = 1.31; 95%CI = 1.08–1.59). In the subgroup analysis stratified by source of controls, significant associations were observed in the population-based subgroup (CC + TC vs TT: OR = 1.33; 95%CI = 1.03–1.71). In conclusion, the results of the present study suggest that CYP1A1 MspI polymorphism might be a risk factor for ALL, particularly childhood ALL. Future well-designed high quality investigations with large sample sizes are required to elucidate the gene polymorphism–ALL relationship and gene–environment interactions.     

Association between the methionine synthase A2756G polymorphism and neural tube defect risk: A meta-analysis

Many studies have accessed the association between methionine synthase (MTR) A2756G polymorphism and neural tube defect (NTD). However, the conclusions are inconsistent. Our study aimed to clarify the nature of the genetic risks contributed by this polymorphism for NTD using meta-analysis. We searched electronic literature from the PubMed, EMBASE, and Medline databases, from which 10 articles were selected according to the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis was conducted in 3 groups, namely, NTD patients, mothers with NTD offspring and fathers with NTD offspring. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals were used to evaluate the strength of the association and the result was corrected by multiple testing. To sum up, no associations between the MTR A2756G polymorphism and NTD risk were found among the 3 groups in all genetic models. However, as their sample size is not large enough, this result needs further research.     

Association between the XRCC3 T241M polymorphism and risk of cancer: Evidence from 157 case–control studies

The T241M polymorphism in the X-ray cross-complementing group 3 (XRCC3) had been implicated in cancer susceptibility. The previous published data on the association between XRCC3 T241M polymorphism and cancer risk remained controversial. Hence, we performed a meta-analysis to investigate the association between cancer susceptibility and XRCC3 T241M (61,861 cases and 84,584 controls from 157 studies) polymorphism in different inheritance models. We used odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals to assess the strength of the association. Overall, significantly increased cancer risk was observed in any genetic model (dominant model: odds ration [OR] = 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.00–1.13; recessive model: OR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.08–1.23; additive model: OR = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.08–1.28) when all eligible studies were pooled into the meta-analysis. In further stratified and sensitivity analyses, the elevated risk remained for subgroups of bladder cancer and breast cancer, especially in Caucasians. In addition, significantly decreased lung cancer risk was also observed. In summary, this meta-analysis suggests the participation of XRCC3 T241M in the susceptibility for bladder cancer and breast cancer, especially in Caucasians, and XRCC3 T241M polymorphism is associated with decreased lung cancer risk. Moreover, our work also points out the importance of new studies for T241M association in some cancer types, such as gastric cancer, colorectal cancer, and melanoma skin cancer, where at least some of the covariates responsible for heterogeneity could be controlled, to obtain a more conclusive understanding about the function of the XRCC3 polymorphism in cancer development.     

年轻母亲叶酸代谢基因多态性与唐氏综合征发生的关系

为探讨年轻母亲叶酸代谢相关基因MTHFR 677C>T、MTRR 66A>G、RFC-1 80G>A和MTR 2756A>G多态性与唐氏综合征(Down syndrome, DS)发生的关系, 采用随机病例-对照研究设计, 应用PCR-RFLP方法检测60例DS患儿的母亲与68例正常生育女性的基因型。经χ² 检验, MTHFR基因T等位基因频率在病例组和对照组中差异有统计学意义(P<0.05), 而MTRR、MTR和 RFC-1等位基因频率差异无统计学意义。Logistic回归分析显示: 携带MTHFR TT基因型的母亲孕育DS患儿的风险显著增加(OR=3.51, 95% CI=1.30~9.46, P<0.05), 而杂合子CT以及CT合并TT基因型与DS发生风险无显著关联; 携带MTRR GG基因型的母亲孕育DS患儿的风险增加3.16倍(OR=3.16, 95% CI=1.20~8.35, P<0.05), 而RFC-1和MTR突变基因型与DS发生风险无显著关联; MTHFR(CT+TT)/MTRR GG、MTHFR (CT+TT)/ RFC-1 AA、MTHFR CC / MTR (AG +GG)、 MTHFR (CT+TT)/MTR AA、MTRR GG/MTR AA和RFC-1 AA / MTR AA联合基因型与DS发生风险显著相关。结果表明, 年轻女性MTHFR 677C>T、MTRR 66A>G位点变异是孕育DS患儿的独立风险因子, 尚不能认为RFC-1 80G>A、MTR 2756A>G多态性与DS发生相关, 而基因与基因多态位点之间存在交互和修饰效应。     

MTHFR、MTRR和MTR基因多态性与唐氏综合征发生的相关性研究

应用PCR-RFLP方法分析31例唐氏综合征（Down＇s syndrome, DS）患儿母亲和68例正常生育女性叶酸代谢相关基因：MTHFR 677C〉T、MTRR 66A〉G和MTR 2756A〉G多态性,探讨其与唐氏综合征DS发生的关系。采用Pearson χ^2 检验基因和基因型频率分布,并分析各基因之间的相互作用,计算比值比评价相对危险度。MTHFR基因T等位基因频率在病例组和对照组中具有显著性差异（P〈0.05）,而MTRR和MTR基因G等位基因频率在病例组和对照组中的差异无显著性。MTHFR TT基因型母亲生育DS风险显著增加（OR=3.51,95 %CI=1.04-11.85,P〈0.05）。MTRR GG基因型生育DS的风险增加3.57倍（OR=3.57,95 %CI=1.19-10.73,P〈0.05）。MTR突变基因型AG和GG与生育DS的风险无显著关系。MTHFR （CT＋TT）/MTRR GG、MTHFR （CT＋TT）/MTR AA和MTRR GG/MTR AA联合基因型与DS发生风险显著相关。结果表明,MTHFR 677C〉T、MTRR 66A〉G位点变异是生育DS的独立风险因子,尚不能认为MTR 2756A〉G多态与DS发生相关。基因与基因多态位点之间存在交互和修饰效应。     

Role of CYP1A2*1F polymorphism in cancer risk: Evidence from a meta-analysis of 46 case–control studies

Background

Emerging evidence showed that the common polymorphism (CYP1A2*1F, rs762551 C → A) in the promoter region of the CYP1A2 gene might be associated with susceptibility to cancer in humans. But individually published results were inconclusive. The aim of this meta-analysis is to investigate the association between CYP1A2*1F polymorphism and cancer risk.

Methods

The Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science and Chinese BioMedical databases were searched for all articles published up to September 1st, 2012. Statistical analyses were performed using the STATA 12.0 software.

Results

Forty-six case–control studies were included with a total of 22,993 cancer cases and 28,420 healthy controls. Meta-analysis results showed that the A allele of CYP1A2*1F polymorphism was associated with a decreased cancer risk (odds ratio [OR] = 0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.87–0.98, P = 0.013). In the subgroup analysis by cancer types, the A allele of CYP1A2*1F polymorphism may increase the risk of breast cancer (OR = 1.05, 95% CI: 1.01–1.10, P = 0.024), and is also associated with a decreased risk of ovarian cancer (OR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.54–0.89, P = 0.004). However, similar results were not found in lung, colorectal, bladder, endometrial, pancreatic and gastric cancers. Further subgroup analysis by ethnicity also showed a significant association between the A allele of CYP1A2*1F polymorphism and a decreased cancer risk among Caucasian populations (OR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.84–0.98, P = 0.014); but no significant associations were observed among Asian populations.

Conclusions

Results from the current meta-analysis indicate that the A allele of CYP1A2*1F polymorphism may be associated with breast and ovarian cancer risk, especially among Caucasian populations.     

Glutathione S-transferase T1 polymorphism is associated with breast cancer susceptibility

The association between present/null polymorphism of glutathione S-transferase T1 (GSTT1) and breast cancer risk are still inconclusive. We performed a meta-analysis to derive a more precise estimation of the relationship. A total of 48 studies including 17,254 cases and 21,163 controls were involved in this meta-analysis. When all studies were pooled into the meta-analysis, significantly elevated breast cancer risk was associated with null genotype (OR = 1.138, 95% CI = 1.051–1.232). When stratified by ethnicity, significantly increased risks were found for Caucasians (OR = 1.185, 95% CI = 1.075–1.306), but no statistically significantly increased risks were found in Asians (OR = 1.017, 95% CI = 0.846–1.223) and Africans (OR = 1.160, 95% CI = 0.815–1.650). In the subgroup analysis by controls source, statistically significantly elevated risks were both found in population-based studies (OR = 1.123, 95% CI = 1.014–1.243) and hospital-based studies (OR = 1.181, 95% CI = 1.056–1.321). When stratified by menopausal status, no statistically significantly increased risks were found in premenopausal women (OR = 1.115, 95% CI = 0.925–1.345) and postmenopausal women (OR = 1.077, 95% CI = 0.992–1.169). In summary, this meta-analysis suggests that the GSTT1 null genotype is a risk allele for breast cancer development. However, large sample and representative population-based studies with homogeneous breast cancer patients and well matched controls are warranted to confirm this finding.     

The Hsa-miR-27a rs895819 (A > G) polymorphism and cancer susceptibility

Published data on the association between the rs895819 (A > G) polymorphism in the terminal loop of pre-miR-27a and cancer risk is inconclusive. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to estimate the association between this polymorphism and cancer. The PubMed, Web of science, and Embase databases were searched for articles on the hsa-miR-27a rs895819 polymorphism and cancer risk published up to November 24, 2012. The genotype data obtained in the searches were pooled in our meta-analysis, and pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to assess the association. Seven studies with a total of 3849 cases and 4781 controls were eligible for analysis. Overall, we found no significant associations between the hsa-miR-27a rs895819 (A > G) polymorphism and cancer susceptibility (homozygote model: OR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.68–1.14; heterozygote model: OR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.79–1.17; dominant model: OR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.79–1.12; recessive model: OR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.69–1.12). In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, we found that the rs895819 AG genotype was associated with a decreased risk of cancer in white individuals (dominant model: OR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.76–0.94; heterozygote model: OR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.75–0.94). This meta-analysis indicated that the hsa-miR-27a rs895819 polymorphism did not correlate with overall cancer risk in the general population. However, the rs895819 AG genotype may protect against the development of cancer in white individuals. Larger, better studies of homogeneous cancer patients are needed to further assess the correlation between this polymorphism and cancer risk.     

The CXCL12 G801A polymorphism and cancer risk: Evidence from 17 case‐control studies

CXCL12 has been implicated in human carcinogenesis, but the association between the most-studied G801A polymorphism (rs1801157) and the risk of various cancers was reported with inconclusive results. The aim of this study was to assess the association between the CXCL12 G801A polymorphism and cancer risk. A meta-analysis of 17 studies with 3048 cancer patients and 4522 controls was conducted to evaluate the strength of the association using odds ratio (OR) with its 95% confidence interval (CI). The overall results showed that the variant genotypes were associated with a significantly increased risk of all cancer types (OR = 1.38, 95%CI = 1.18–1.61 for GA versus GG, and OR = 1.36, 95%CI = 1.17–1.59 for GA/AA versus GG). In the stratified analyses, there was a significantly increased risk for the studies of breast cancer (OR = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.16–2.33 for AA versus GG, OR = 1.42, 95%CI = 1.18–1.71 for GA versus GG, and OR = 1.44, 95%CI = 1.21–1.72 for GA/AA versus GG) and lung cancer (OR = 2.86, 95% CI = 1.75–4.69 for AA versus GG, OR = 1.62, 95% CI = 1.20–2.18 for GA vs. GG, OR = 1.80, 95% CI = 1.36–2.39 for GA/AA versus GG, and OR = 2.24, 95%CI = 1.41–3.57 for AA versus GA/GG), which remained for the studies of Asian populations and hospital-based control sources. Although some modest bias could not be eliminated, this meta-analysis indicates that the CXCL12 G801A polymorphism is a low-penetrance risk factor for cancer development.     

Association between the − 786T>C 1polymorphism in the promoter region of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) and risk of coronary artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

A variety of studies have evaluated the association between the − 786T>C polymorphism in the promoter region of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) and risk of coronary artery disease (CAD). However, the results remain conflicting. To better understand the role of eNOS − 786T>C polymorphism in CAD risk, we conducted a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods

Case–control, cohort or cross-sectional studies evaluating the association between eNOS − 786T>C polymorphism and CAD risk were searched in electronic databases of PubMed, ISI Web of Knowledge, Medline, Embase and Google Scholar Search (up to January 2013). Overall and subgroup analyses were performed. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to evaluate the association between eNOS − 786T>C polymorphism and CAD risk. Statistical analysis was performed with Review Manager 5.0 and STATA12.0.

Results

Twenty-four studies were analyzed between 6192 CAD cases and 9281 healthy controls. The combined results of overall analysis showed significant positive associations between CAD risk and eNOS − 786T>C polymorphism in dominant model (OR = 1.45, 95% CI = 1.27–1.65), recessive model (OR = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.20–1.56), homozygote comparison (OR = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.31–2.04), heterozygote comparison (TC vs. TT, OR = 1.39, 95% CI = 1.23–1.57; CC vs. TC, OR = 1.20, 95% CI = 1.04–1.37) and allele comparison (OR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.21–1.50). On subgroup analysis based on the ethnicity of population (Caucasians, Asians and others), significant differences were found in all genetic models for Caucasians, similar associations existed in Asians except heterozygote comparison (CC vs. TC). However, the associations were only found in dominant model, heterozygote comparison (TC vs. TT) and allele comparison for the populations named others.

Conclusions

Our investigations demonstrate the significant associations between eNOS − 786C>T polymorphism and CAD risk, and this polymorphism might become an early marker for the risk evaluation of CAD.     

Association between folate metabolism polymorphisms and breast cancer: a case-control study

We investigated the association between methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR C677T and A1298C), methionine synthetase (MTR A2756G), and methionine synthase reductase (MTRR A66G) polymorphisms involved in folate pathway and breast cancer risk, and the interaction between these polymorphisms and tobacco and alcohol consumption. Furthermore, we evaluated the association between these polymorphisms and clinicopathological variables. This case-control study included 606 Brazilian women, comprising 128 patients with breast cancer and 478 controls. MTHFR and MTR polymorphisms were genotyped using polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) and MTRR polymorphisms using real-time PCR. Age ≥50 years (odds ratio [OR]: 2.65; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.65-4.26; p<0.001) and alcohol consumption (OR: 1.76; 95% CI: 1.0-2.85; p=0.021) were associated with an increased risk of breast cancer. For MTHFR A1298C, we observed a reduced risk of developing breast cancer in the codominant model (genotype CC-OR: 0.22; 95% CI: 0.06-0.74; p=0.014), recessive model (OR: 0.22; 95% CI: 0.07-0.76 p=0.004), and log-additive model (OR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.49-0.98; p=0.035). Women aged ≥50 years and those who are alcohol consumers had increased susceptibility to breast cancer, and MTHFR A1298C modulated the risk for this disease. This is the first study to evaluate the association between polymorphisms in folate metabolism and breast cancer in the northwest region of São Paulo State, Brazil.