Complex formation of the interferon (IFN) consensus sequence-binding protein with IRF-1 is essential for murine macrophage IFN-gamma-induced iNOS gene expression

This study describes the role of the interferon (IFN) consensus sequence-binding protein (ICSBP or IRF-8) in iNOS gene expression by murine macrophages. An ICSBP binding site in the iNOS promoter region (-923 to -913) was identified using an electrophoretic mobility shift assay and chromatin co-immunoprecipitation. Overexpression of ICSBP greatly enhanced IFN-gamma-induced iNOS promoter activation in RAW264.7 cells, and IFN-gamma-induced iNOS promoter activation was abolished in ICSBP-/- macrophages. Furthermore, transduction of retrovirus-ICSBP in ICSBP-/- macrophages rescued IFN-gamma-induced iNOS gene expression. However, transduction of retrovirus-ICSBP in the absence of IFN-gamma activation did not induce iNOS expression in either RAW264.7 cells or ICSBP-/- macrophages. Interestingly, ICSBP alone transduced into ICSBP-/- macrophages did not bind to IFN-stimulated response element site (-923 to -913) of the iNOS promoter region, although following activation with IFN-gamma, a DNA.protein complex was formed that contains ICSBP and IRF-1. Co-transduction of ICSBP with IRF-1 clearly induces nitric oxide production. In addition, interleukin-4 inhibits IFN-gamma-induced iNOS gene expression by attenuating the physical interaction of ICSBP with IRF-1. Complex formation of ICSBP with IRF-1 is essential for iNOS expression, and interleukin-4 attenuates the physical interaction of ICSBP with IRF-1 resulting in the inhibition of INOS gene expression.     

IFN-gamma + LPS induction of iNOS is modulated by ERK, JNK/SAPK, and p38(mapk) in a mouse macrophage cell line

Nitric oxide (NO.) produced by inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) mediates a number of important physiological and pathophysiological processes. The objective of this investigation was to examine the role of mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) in the regulation of iNOS and NO. by interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) + lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in macrophages using specific inhibitors and dominant inhibitory mutant proteins of the MAPK pathways. The signaling pathway utilized by IFN-gamma in iNOS induction is well elucidated. To study signaling pathways that are restricted to the LPS-signaling arm, we used a subclone of the parental RAW 264.7 cell line that is unresponsive to IFN-gamma alone with respect to iNOS induction. In this RAW 264.7gammaNO(-) subclone, IFN-gamma and LPS are nevertheless required for synergistic activation of the iNOS promoter. We found that extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) augmented and p38(mapk) inhibited IFN-gamma + LPS induction of iNOS. Dominant-negative MAPK kinase-4 inhibited iNOS promoter activation by IFN-gamma + LPS, also implicating the c-Jun NH(2)-terminal kinase (JNK) pathway in mediating iNOS induction. Inhibition of the ERK pathway markedly reduced IFN-gamma + LPS-induced tumor necrosis factor-alpha protein expression, providing a possible mechanism by which ERK augments iNOS expression. The inhibitory effect of p38(mapk) appears more complex and may be due to the ability of p38(mapk) to inhibit LPS-induced JNK activation. These results indicate that the MAPKs are important regulators of iNOS-NO. expression by IFN-gamma + LPS.     

IFN-gamma up-regulates IL-18 gene expression via IFN consensus sequence-binding protein and activator protein-1 elements in macrophages

Constitutive IL-18 expression is detected from many different cells, including macrophages, keratinocytes, and osteoblasts. It has been known that IL-18 gene expression is regulated by two different promoters (p1 promoter and p2 promoter). When RAW 264.7 macrophages were treated with IFN-gamma, IL-18 gene expression was increased in a dose- and time-dependent manner. IFN-gamma activated the inducible promoter 1, but not the constitutive promoter 2. Mutagenesis studies indicated that an IFN consensus sequence-binding protein (ICSBP) binding site between -39 and -22 was critical for the IFN-gamma inducibility. EMSA using an ICSBP oligonucleotide probe showed that IFN-gamma treatment increased the formation of DNA-binding complex, which was supershifted with anti-IFN regulatory factor-1 Ab and anti-ICSBP Ab. Another element, an AP-1 site between -1120 and -1083, was important. EMSA using an AP-1-specific oligonucleotide demonstrated that IFN-gamma or LPS treatment increased the AP-1-binding activity. The addition of anti-c-Jun Ab or anti-c-Fos Ab to IFN-gamma- or LPS-treated nuclear extracts resulted in the reduction of AP-1 complex or the formation of a supershifted complex. Taken together, these results indicate that IFN-gamma increased IL-18 gene expression via ICSBP and AP-1 elements.     

Complement factor B gene regulation: synergistic effects of TNF-alpha and IFN-gamma in macrophages

Complement factor B (Bf) plays an important role in activating the alternative complement pathway. The inflammatory cytokines, in particular TNF-alpha and IFN-gamma, are critical in the regulation of Bf gene expression in macrophages. In this study, we investigated the mechanisms of Bf gene regulation by TNF-alpha and IFN-gamma in murine macrophages. Northern analysis revealed that Bf mRNA expression was synergistically up-regulated by TNF-alpha and IFN-gamma in MH-S cells. Truncations of the 5' Bf promoter identified a region between -556 and -282 bp that mediated TNF-alpha responsiveness as well as the synergistic effect of TNF-alpha and IFN-gamma on Bf expression. Site-directed mutagenesis of a NF-kappaB-binding element in this region (-433 to -423 bp) abrogated TNF-alpha responsiveness and decreased the synergistic effect of TNF-alpha and IFN-gamma on Bf expression. EMSAs revealed nuclear protein binding to this NF-kappaB cis-binding element on TNF-alpha stimulation. Supershift analysis revealed that both p50 and p65 proteins contribute to induction of Bf by TNF-alpha. An I-kappaB dominant negative mutant blocked Bf induction by TNF-alpha and reduced the synergistic induction by TNF-alpha and IFN-gamma. In addition, the proteasome inhibitor MG132, which blocks NF-kappaB induction, blocked TNF-alpha-induced Bf promoter activity and the synergistic induction of Bf promoter activity by TNF-alpha and IFN-gamma. LPS was found to induce Bf promoter activity through the same NF-kappaB cis-binding site. These findings suggest that a NF-kappaB cis-binding site between -433 and -423 bp is required for TNF-alpha responsiveness and for TNF-alpha- and IFN-gamma-stimulated synergistic responsiveness of the Bf gene.     

Roles of IFN consensus sequence binding protein and PU.1 in regulating IL-18 gene expression.

IL-18 is expressed from a variety of cell types. Two promoters located upstream of exon 1 (5'-flanking region) and upstream of exon 2 (intron 1) regulate its expression. Both promoter regions were cloned into pCAT-Basic plasmid to yield p1-2686 for the 5'-flanking promoter and p2-2.3 for the intron 1 promoter. Both promoters showed basal constitutive activity and LPS inducibility when transfected into RAW 264.7 macrophages. To learn the regulatory elements of both promoters, 5'-serial deletion and site-directed mutants were prepared. For the activity of the p1-2686 promoter, the IFN consensus sequence binding protein (ICSBP) binding site between -39 and -22 was critical. EMSA using an oligonucleotide probe encompassing the ICSBP binding site showed that LPS treatment increased the formation of DNA binding complex. In addition, when supershift assays were performed, retardation of the protein-DNA complex was seen after the addition of anti-ICSBP Ab. For the activity of the p2-2.3 promoter, the PU.1 binding site between -31 and -13 was important. EMSA using a PU.1-specific oligonucleotide demonstrated that LPS treatment increased PU.1 binding activity. The addition of PU.1-specific Ab to LPS-treated nuclear extracts resulted in the formation of a supershifted complex. Furthermore, cotransfection of ICSBP or PU.1 expression vector increased p1 promoter activity or IL-18 expression, respectively. Taken together, these results indicate that ICSBP and PU.1 are critical elements for IL-18 gene expression.     

Inhibition of IFN-gamma-induced janus kinase-1-STAT1 activation in macrophages by vasoactive intestinal peptide and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide

The vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) and the pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP), two immunomodulatory neuropeptides that affect both innate and acquired immunity, down-regulate IL-12 p40 and inducible NO synthase expression in LPS/IFN-gamma-stimulated macrophages. We showed previously that VIP/PACAP inhibit NF-kappaB nuclear translocation through the stabilization of IkappaB and reduce IFN regulatory factor-1 (IRF-1) binding to the regulatory elements found in the IL-12 p40 and inducible NO synthase promoters. In this paper we studied the molecular mechanisms involved in the VIP/PACAP regulation of IRF-1 transactivating activity. Our studies indicate that the inhibition in IRF-1 binding correlates with a reduction in IRF-1 protein and mRNA in IFN-gamma-treated Raw 264.7 macrophages. In agreement with the described Janus kinase (Jak)1/Jak2/STAT1/IRF-1 activation pathway, VIP/PACAP inhibit Jak1/Jak2, STAT1 phosphorylation, and the binding of STAT1 to the GAS sequence motif in the IRF-1 promoter. The effects of VIP/PACAP are mediated through the specific VIP/PACAP receptor-1 and the cAMP/protein kinase A (PKA) transduction pathway, but not through the induction of suppressor of cytokine signaling-1 or suppressor of cytokine signaling-3. Because IFN-gamma is a major stimulator of innate immune responses in vivo, the down-regulation of IFN-gamma-induced gene expression by VIP and PACAP could represent a significant element in the regulation of the inflammatory response by endogenous neuropeptides.     

Lipopolysaccharide and Raf-1 kinase regulate secretory interleukin-1 receptor antagonist gene expression by mutually antagonistic mechanisms.

Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) treatment of monocytic cells has been shown to activate the Raf-1/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway and to increase secretory interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (sIL-1Ra) gene expression. The significance of the activation of the Raf-1/MAPK signaling pathway to LPS regulation of sIL-1Ra gene expression, however, has not been determined. This study addresses the role of the Raf-1/MAPK signaling pathway in regulation of sIL-1Ra gene expression by LPS. Cotransfection of the murine macrophage cell line RAW 264.7 with a 294-bp sIL-1Ra promoter/luciferase construct (pRA-294-luc) and a constitutively active Raf-1 kinase expression vector (pRSV-Raf-BXB) resulted in induction of sIL-1Ra promoter activity, indicating that Raf-1, like LPS, can regulate sIL-1Ra promoter activity. An in vitro MAPK analysis indicated that both LPS treatment and pRSV-Raf-BXB transfection of RAW 264.7 cells increases p42 MAPK activity. An in vitro Raf-1 kinase assay, however, failed to detect LPS-induced Raf-1 kinase activity in RAW 264.7 cells, suggesting that in RAW 264.7 cells, Raf-1 kinase is not an activating component of the LPS signaling pathway regulating MAPK activity or sIL-1Ra promoter activity. This observation was supported by results from transfection studies which demonstrated that expression of a dominant-inhibitory Raf-1 mutant in RAW 264.7 cells does not inhibit LPS-induced MAPK activity or sIL-1Ra promoter activity, indicating that LPS-induced sIL-1Ra promoter activation occurs independent of the Raf-1/MAPK signaling pathway. In additional studies, cotransfection of RAW 264.7 cells with pRA-294-luc and increasing amounts of pRSV-Raf-BXB caused a dose-dependent inhibition of LPS-induced sIL-1Ra promoter activity, indicating that the role of the Raf-1 pathway in the regulation of sIL-1Ra promoter activity by LPS is as an antagonizer. Interestingly, LPS treatment of RAW 264.7 cells, cotransfected with pRA-294-luc and pRSV-Raf-BXB, also inhibited pRSV-Raf-BXB-induced sIL-1Ra promoter activity, suggesting that inductions of sIL-1Ra promoter activity by LPS and Raf-1 actually occur by mutually antagonistic mechanisms. In support of this conclusion, sIL-1Ra promoter mapping studies indicated that LPS and Raf-1 responses localized to different regions of the sIL-1Ra promoter. Further studies demonstrated that mutual antagonism between the LPS and Raf-1 kinase pathways is not promoter specific, as the same phenomenon is observed in assays using a c-fos enhancer/thymidine kinase promoter/luciferase construct (pc-fos-TK81-luc). Additionally, mutual antagonism with regard to sIL-1Ra promoter activity also was observed between the LPS and MEK kinase pathways, indicating that mutual antagonism can occur in more than one MAPK activation pathway.