Conformation of fork junction DNA in a complex with Escherichia coli RNA polymerase

Escherichia coli RNA polymerase is able to bind fork junction DNA containing a conserved -10 promoter element in a sequence-specific manner, and it is believed that polymerase-fork junction DNA interaction mimics those between the enzyme and the promoter DNA in the open complex. In this report we determined the conformation of polymerase-bound fork junction DNA in solution. A series of distances between sites in the fork junction DNA in complex with polymerase were determined using luminescence and fluorescence resonance energy transfer. A series of fork junction DNAs were prepared containing the luminescent or fluorescent donor probe at the upstream or at the downstream end of the fork DNA and acceptor probes at nine positions within the fork junction DNA. The measured distances were compared with analogous distances in a model reference DNA duplex, and the observed distance differences were used to build a model of the fork junction DNA in a complex with the polymerase. The obtained model revealed an insignificant perturbation of the duplex part of the fork DNA in a complex with the polymerase whereas a sharp kink of DNA was observed at the ds/ss DNA boundary of the fork junction DNA.     

Sequence-Dependent Upstream DNA-RNA Polymerase Interactions in the Open Complex with λPR and λPRM Promoters and Implications for the Mechanism of Promoter Interference

Upstream interactions of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase (RNAP) in an open promoter complex (RPo) formed at the P_R and P_RM promoters of bacteriophage λ have been studied by atomic force microscopy. We demonstrate that the previously described 30-nm DNA compaction observed upon RPo formation at P_R [Rivetti, C., Guthold, M. & Bustamante, C. (1999). Wrapping of DNA around the E. coli RNA polymerase open promoter complex. EMBO J., 18, 4464-4475.] is a consequence of the specific interaction of the RNAP with two AT-rich sequence determinants positioned from − 36 to − 59 and from − 80 to − 100. Likewise, RPos formed at P_RM showed a specific contact between RNAP and the upstream DNA sequence. We further demonstrate that this interaction, which results in DNA wrapping against the polymerase surface, is mediated by the C-terminal domains of α-subunits (carboxy-terminal domain). Substitution of these AT-rich sequences with heterologous DNA reduces DNA wrapping but has only a small effect on the activity of the P_R promoter. We find, however, that the frequency of DNA templates with both P_R and P_RM occupied by an RNAP significantly increases upon loss of DNA wrapping. These results suggest that α carboxy-terminal domain interactions with upstream DNA can also play a role in regulating the expression of closely spaced promoters. Finally, a model for a possible mechanism of promoter interference between P_R and P_RM is proposed.     

Role of the spacer between the -35 and -10 regions in sigmas promoter selectivity in Escherichia coli

In vitro, the sigma(s) subunit of RNA polymerase (RNAP), RpoS, recognizes nearly identical -35 and -10 promoter consensus sequences as the vegetative sigma70. In vivo, promoter selectivity of RNAP holoenzyme containing either sigma(s) (Esigma(s)) or sigma70 (Esigma70) seems to be achieved by the differential ability of the two holoenzymes to tolerate deviations from the promoter consensus sequence. In this study, we suggest that many natural sigma(s)-dependent promoters possess a -35 element, a feature that has been considered as not conserved among sigma(s)-dependent promoters. These -35 hexamers are mostly non-optimally spaced from the -10 region, but nevertheless functional. A +/- 2 bp deviation from the optimal spacer length of 17 bp or the complete absence of a -35 consensus sequence decreases overall promoter activity, but at the same time favours Esigma(s) in its competition with Esigma70 for promoter recognition. On the other hand, the reduction of promoter activity due to shifting of the -35 element can be counterbalanced by an activity-stimulating feature such as A/T-richness of the spacer region without compromising Esigma(s) selectivity. Based on mutational analysis of sigma(s), we suggest a role of regions 2.5 and 4 of sigma(s) in sensing sub-optimally located -35 elements.     

Sequence determinants for the recognition of the fork junction DNA containing the -10 region of promoter DNA by E. coli RNA polymerase

It has been recently suggested that E. coli RNA polymerase can specifically recognize a fork junction DNA structure, suggesting a possible role for such interaction in promoter DNA melting [Guo, Y., and Gralla, J. D. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95, 11655-11660]. We have determined here quantitatively, using a site-specific binding assay, the effects of base substitutions within the conserved -10 hexamer in the context of a short fork junction DNA on binding to RNA polymerase. Adenine at position -11 and thymine at position -7 were found to be critical for sequence-specific recognition of the DNA. The identities of bases at positions -9 and -8 were found to be not important for the binding whereas replacement of bases at positions -12 and -10 had a mild negative effect on the binding affinity. It was found that for the binding of fork DNA to RNA polymerase, specific sequence recognition was more important than specific recognition of fork junction DNA structure. The pattern of relative importance of bases in the -10 region for binding RNA polymerase was generally consistent with the sequence conservation pattern observed in nature where positions -11 and -7 are the most conserved. Binding experiments with a series of adenine analogues at position -11 revealed that the N1 nitrogen of adenine was a critical determinant for the preference of the adenine at this position, suggesting a mechanism for the nucleation of promoter DNA melting initiation in which RNA polymerase destabilizes duplex DNA by directly competing with the thymine of the A-T base pair for hydrogen bonding to the N1 position of the -11 nontemplate strand adenine.     

Identification and analysis of 'extended -10' promoters in Escherichia coli

We have compiled and aligned the DNA sequences of 554 promoter regions from Escherichia coli and analysed the alignment for sequence similarities. We have focused on the similarities and differences between promoters that either do or do not contain an extended –10 element. The distribution of –10 and –35 hexamer element sequences, the range of spacer lengths between these elements and the frequencies of occurrence of different nucleotides, dinucleotides and trinucleotides were investigated. Extended –10 promoters, which contain a 5′-TG-3′ element, tend to have longer spacer lengths than promoters that do not. They also tend to show fewer matches to the consensus –35 hexamer element and contain short runs of T residues in the spacer region. We have shown experimentally that the extended –10 5′-TG-3′ motif contributes to promoter activity at seven different promoters. The importance of the motif at different promoters is dependent on the sequence of other promoter elements.