Semicontinuous diffusion fermentation of fodder beets for fuel ethanol and cubed protein feed production

A novel, semicontinuous diffusion fermentation system was used to produce fuel ethanol and a cubed protein feed (CPF) from fodder beets at an intermediate scale. In the process, fodder beet cubes were augered diagonally upward against a flow of 0.26N H(2)SO(4) and yeast in a tubular fermentor. Exiting one end of the fermentor was CPF, while fermented beer [6-9% (v/v) ethanol] exited the other end. Retention times for beer and CPF were 264 and 72 h, respectively. Contamination was controlled by maintaining the fermentation pH between 2.1 and 2.6 using H(2)SO(4). Production costs for a greatly scaled-up (times 1400) conceptual version of this system (using a continuous rather than a semicontinuous processing mode) were projected by calculation to be $0.529/L for 95% ethanol (net of a $0.112/L credit for CPF). The calculated energy balance (energy output-energy input ratio) was estimated to be 3.04. In calculating the energy balance, the output energy of the CPF and input energy for growing the fodder beets were not included. A design for the scaled-up plant is provided.     

Effect of pulp pH on solid phase fermentation of fodder beets for fuel ethanol production

Summary The pH of fodder beet pulp was varied to see how this affected solid phase fermentation by yeast. The process is for fuel ethanol production. When pulp was adjusted to a pre-inoculation pH of 3.0–3.5, ethanol yields (78–85% of theoretical, averaging 8.9% v/v) and fermentation efficiencies (97–99%) were greatest, the fermentation time was the shortest (30–39 h) and no bacterial contamination occurred.     

A continuous, farm-scale, solid-phase fermentation process for fuel ethanol and protein feed production from fodder beets

Fuel ethanol (95%) was produced from fodder beets in two farm-scale processes. In the first process, involving conventional submerged fermentation of the fodder beets in a mash, ethanol and a feed (PF) rich in protein, fat, and fiber were produced. Ethanol yields of 70 L/metric ton (7 gal/ton) were obtained; however, resulting beers had low ethanol concentrations [3-5% (v/v)]. The high viscosity of medium and low sugar, beet mashes caused mixing problems which prevented any further increase of beet sugar in the mash. The severely limited the maximum attainable ethanol concentration during fermentation, thereby making the beer costly to distill into fuel ethanol and the process energy inefficient. In order to achieve distillably worthwhile ethanol concentrations of 8-10% (v/v), we developed and tested a solid-phase fermentation process (continuous). In preliminary trials, this system produced fermented pulp with over 8% (v/v) ethanol corresponding to an ethanol yield of 87 L/metric ton (21 gal/ton). Production costs with this novel process are $0.47/L ($1.77/gal) and the energy balance is 2.11. These preliminary cost estimates indicate that fodder beets are potentially competitive with corn as an ethanol feedstock. Additional research, however, is warranted to more precisely refine individual costs, energy balances and the actual value of the PF.     

Technology and economics of ethanol production from fodder beets via solid-phase fermentation

Summary Operating conditions for our semi-continuous, solid-phase fermentation system were optimized for conversion of fodder beets to fuel ethanol and distiller's wet feed (DWF). This information was then used to estimate operating parameters achievable in a commercial plant, and likely baseline production costs of such a plant. Initial acidification of pulp to pH 2.9–3.2 was effective in controlling bacterial contamination. The maximum operating capacity of the fermentor was approximately 92%, with 75% used for commercial application. A fermentation time of 24 h was sufficient to completely ferment the beet pulp to 8–9% (v/v) ethanol. Based on these parameters, a fodder beet cost of $19.25/metric ton ($17.50/ton), other operating and capital costs, and a PF credit of $0.14/L ($0.53/gal), ethanol production costs were estimated to be $0.49/L ($1.87/gal).     

Effect of fodder beet cube size on ethanol production via diffusion fermentation

Summary The size of fodder beet cubes used to produce fuel ethanol via diffusion fermentation was varied to see how this affected various fermentation parameters. The highest yeast populations, shortest fermentation times, and highest ethanol yields and fermentation efficiencies were observed when 2.54 cm square cubes (or smaller) were utilized. Ethanol concentrations here averaged 4.21% (v/v) while the highest concentration reached was 4.83%. To minimize energy for slicing beets and still optimize yields, cubes of 1.91–2.54 cm should be used.     

Solid phase fermentation of foder beets for ethanol production: Effect of grind size

Solid phase fermentation of pulped fodder beets was studied to see what effect beet particle size had on various fermentation parameters. All trials were run in 4-l stainless stell containers and hammermilled pulp was initially adjusted to pH 3.0 to control bacterial contaminants. The maximum yeast population that built up in the pulp was independent of the hammermill screen size (0.476–1.905 cm) and averaged 2.0−2.3 × 10⁸ cells/ml. Pulp from finer screens (0.476–0.953 cm) took 19–22 h to reach a peak yeast population while pulp from coarser screens (1.270–1.905 cm) took a slightly longer 24–28 h. The time to reach maxium ethanol concentration was not affected by screeen size and averaged 28–30 h. Ethanol yields dropped slightly form 85–87% of theoretical with the finest screens to 83–84% with the coarset screens. The maximum ethanol concentration observed was 7.96% (v/v) and the average of all runs was 7.63% (v/v). Fermentation efficiency averaged 98–99% thoughout. The lack of a response to grinding fodder beets with different screens was due to their wet fibrous nature which hindered free flow of pulp though the screens. Pulp was, instead, extruded though the screens, forming particles of generally similar size. Our results indicate that the primary consideration for grind size is energy consumption for grinding. Therefore, if a hammermill is used, a large screen (1.270–1.905 cm) which requires less energy should be employed so as to minimize energy consumption. This strategy does not result in longer fermentation times or reduced ethanol yields.     

Modeling bacterial contamination of fuel ethanol fermentation

The emergence of antibiotic‐resistant bacteria may limit the effectiveness of antibiotics to treat bacterial contamination in fuel ethanol plants, and therefore, new antibacterial intervention methods and tools to test their application are needed. Using shake‐flask cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae grown on saccharified corn mash and strains of lactic acid bacteria isolated from a dry‐grind ethanol facility, a simple model to simulate bacterial contamination and infection was developed. Challenging the model with 10⁸ CFU/mL Lactobacillus fermentum decreased ethanol yield by 27% and increased residual glucose from 6.2 to 45.5 g/L. The magnitude of the effect was proportional to the initial bacterial load, with 10⁵ CFU/mL L. fermentum still producing an 8% decrease in ethanol and a 3.2‐fold increase in residual glucose. Infection was also dependent on the bacterial species used to challenge the fermentation, as neither L. delbrueckii ATCC 4797 nor L. amylovorus 0315‐7B produced a significant decrease in ethanol when inoculated at a density of 10⁸ CFU/mL. In the shake‐flask model, treatment with 2 µg/mL virginiamycin mitigated the infection when challenged with a susceptible strain of L. fermentum (MIC for virginiamycin ≤2 ppm), but treatment was ineffective at treating infection by a resistant strain of L. fermentum (MIC = 16 ppm). The model may find application in developing new antibacterial agents and management practices for use in controlling contamination in the fuel ethanol industry. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2009;103: 117–122. Published 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Continuous tower fermentation for power ethanol production

Summary The capability of the continuous tower fermenter to accumulate and retain high cell densities (70–90 g dry wt/1) when using naturally flocculant yeasts is demonstrated with semi-defined glucose feed at concentrations of 120–200 g/1 and high hydraulic loadings. Conversion and ethanol productivity data are given as a function of throughput and feed glucose concentration.     

Solid-state fermentation of grape pomace for ethanol production

Summary Grape pomace was used as a substrate for the production of ethanol under solid-state fermentation conditions. The yield of ethanol amounted to greater than 80% of the theoretical, based on the fermentable sugar consumed.     

On-line identification of fermentation processes for ethanol production

Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering - A strategy for monitoring fermentation processes, specifically, simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) of corn mash, was developed. The...     

Solid-state fermentation of carob pods for ethanol production

The production of ethanol from carob pods by Saccharomyces cerevisiae in solid-state fermentation was investigated. The maximal ethanol concentration (160±3 g/kg dry pods), ethanol productivity (6.7 ± 0.2 g/kg per hour), ethanol yield (40 ± 1.8%), biomass concentration (7.5 ± 0.4 x 10⁸ cells/g carob pulp) and fermentation efficiency (80 ± 2%) were obtained at an inoculum amount of 3%, a particle size of 0.5 mm, a moisture level of 70%, a pH of 4.5 and a temperature of 30°C. Under the same fermentation conditions both sterilized and non-sterilized carob pods pulp gave the same maximum ethanol concentration.     

Dry-grind process for fuel ethanol by continuous fermentation and stripping

Conversion of a high-solids saccharified corn mash to ethanol by continuous fermentation and stripping was successfully demonstrated in a pilot plant consuming 25 kg of corn per day. A mathematical model based on previous pilot plant results accurately predicts the specific growth rate obtained from these latest results. This model was incorporated into a simulation of a complete dry-grind corn-to-ethanol plant, and the cost of ethanol production was compared with that of a conventional process. The results indicate a savings of $0.03 per gallon of ethanol produced by the stripping process. The savings with stripping result from the capacity to ferment a more concentrated corn mash so there is less water to remove downstream.     

Tower fermentation using Zymomonas mobilis for ethanol production

Summary Flocculation was induced in a pure strain of the bacteria Zymomonas mobilis. When fermenting glucose to ethanol, cell densities of up to 40g/l were achieved and sustained in a 0.92 litre tower fermenter with dilution rates of up to 2.3 hr^-1. A maximum productivity of 100g EtOH/l/hr with 98% conversion of the 105g/l glucose feed was achieved. The limitation to performance with increase in throughput arose from incomplete fermentation of the feed glucose, rather than washout of the flocculated bacteria.     

Bacterial contaminants of fuel ethanol production

Bacterial contamination is an ongoing problem for commercial fuel ethanol production facilities. Both chronic and acute infections are of concern, due to the fact that bacteria compete with the ethanol-producing yeast for sugar substrates and micronutrients. Lactic acid levels often rise during bouts of contamination, suggesting that the most common contaminants are lactic acid bacteria. However, quantitative surveys of commercial corn-based fuel ethanol facilities are lacking. For this study, samples were collected from one wet mill and two dry grind fuel ethanol facilities over a 9 month period at strategic time points and locations along the production lines, and bacterial contaminants were isolated and identified. Contamination in the wet mill facility consistently reached 10⁶ bacteria/ml. Titers from dry grind facilities were more variable but often reached 10⁸/ml. Antibiotics were not used in the wet mill operation. One dry grind facility added antibiotic to the yeast propagation tank only, while the second facility dosed the fermentation with antibiotic every 4 h. Neither dosing procedure appeared to reliably reduce overall contamination, although the second facility showed less diversity among contaminants. Lactobacillus species were the most abundant isolates from all three plants, averaging 51, 38, and 77% of total isolates from the wet mill and the first and second dry grind facilities, respectively. Although populations varied over time, individual facilities tended to exhibit characteristic bacterial profiles, suggesting the occurrence of persistent endemic infections.Names are necessary to report factually on available data; however, the USDA neither guarantees nor warrants the standard of the product, and the use of the name by USDA implies no approval of the product to the exclusion of others that may also be suitable.     

Pectin-rich biomass as feedstock for fuel ethanol production

The USA has proposed that 30 % of liquid transportation fuel be produced from renewable resources by 2030 (Perlack and Stokes 2011). It will be impossible to reach this goal using corn kernel-based ethanol alone. Pectin-rich biomass, an under-utilized waste product of the sugar and juice industry, can augment US ethanol supplies by capitalizing on this already established feedstock. Currently, pectin-rich biomass is sold (at low value) as animal feed. This review focuses on the three most studied types of pectin-rich biomass: sugar beet pulp, citrus waste and apple pomace. Fermentations of these materials have been conducted with a variety of ethanologens, including yeasts and bacteria. Escherichia coli can ferment a wide range of sugars including galacturonic acid, the primary component of pectin. However, the mixed acid metabolism of E. coli can produce unwanted side products. Saccharomyces cerevisiae cannot naturally ferment galacturonic acid nor pentose sugars but has a homoethanol pathway. Erwinia chrysanthemi is capable of degrading many of the cell wall components of pectin-rich materials, including pectin. Klebsiella oxytoca can metabolize a diverse array of sugars including cellobiose, one degradation product of cellulose. However, both E. chrysanthemi and K. oxytoca produce side products during fermentation, similar to E. coli. Using pectin-rich residues from industrial processes is beneficial because the material is already collected and partially pretreated to facilitate enzymatic deconstruction of the plant cell walls. Using biomass already produced for other purposes is an attractive practice because fewer greenhouse gases (GHG) will be anticipated from land-use changes.     

Yeast selection for fuel ethanol production in Brazil

Brazil is one of the largest ethanol biofuel producers and exporters in the world and its production has increased steadily during the last three decades. The increasing efficiency of Brazilian ethanol plants has been evident due to the many technological contributions. As far as yeast is concerned, few publications are available regarding the industrial fermentation processes in Brazil. The present paper reports on a yeast selection program performed during the last 12 years aimed at selecting Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains suitable for fermentation of sugar cane substrates (cane juice and molasses) with cell recycle, as it is conducted in Brazilian bioethanol plants. As a result, some evidence is presented showing the positive impact of selected yeast strains in increasing ethanol yield and reducing production costs, due to their higher fermentation performance (high ethanol yield, reduced glycerol and foam formation, maintenance of high viability during recycling and very high implantation capability into industrial fermenters). Results also suggest that the great yeast biodiversity found in distillery environments could be an important source of strains. This is because during yeast cell recycling, selective pressure (an adaptive evolution) is imposed on cells, leading to strains with higher tolerance to the stressful conditions of the industrial fermentation.     

Enteric bacterial catalysts for fuel ethanol production.

The technology is available to produce fuel ethanol from renewable lignocellulosic biomass. The current challenge is to assemble the various process options into a commercial venture and begin the task of incremental improvement. Current process designs for lignocellulose are far more complex than grain to ethanol processes. This complexity results in part from the complexity of the substrate and the biological limitations of the catalyst. Our work at the University of Florida has focused primarily on the genetic engineering of Enteric bacteria using genes encoding Zymomonas mobilis pyruvate decarboxylase and alcohol dehydrogenase. These two genes have been assembled into a portable ethanol production cassette, the PET operon, and integrated into the chromosome of Escherichia coli B for use with hemicellulose-derived syrups. The resulting strain, KO11, produces ethanol efficiently from all hexose and pentose sugars present in the polymers of hemicellulose. By using the same approach, we integrated the PET operon into the chromosome of Klebsiella oxytoca to produce strain P2 for use in the simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) process for cellulose. Strain P2 has the native ability to ferment cellobiose and cellotriose, eliminating the need for one class of cellulase enzymes. Recently, the ability to produce and secrete high levels of endoglucanase has also been added to strain P2, further reducing the requirement for fungal cellulase. The general approach for the genetic engineering of new biocatalysts using the PET operon has been most successful with Enteric bacteria but was also extended to Gram positive bacteria, which have other useful traits for lignocellulose conversion. Many opportunities remain for further improvements in these biocatalysts as we proceed toward the development of single organisms that can be used for the efficient fermentation of both hemicellulosic and cellulosic substrates.     

Optimization of fermentation conditions for ethanol production from whey

Summary Optimal conditions for ethanol production in 7% whey solutions by the yeast Candida pseudotropicalis ATCC 8619 included initial pH of 4.57 and 30°C. Complete fermentation of the available lactose took place without supplementary nutrients; additions of nitrogen or phosphorus salts, yeast extract or corn steep liquor resulted in increased yeast production and lower ethanol yields. A positive correlation was observed between increases in yeast inocula and lactose utilization and ethanol production rates; 8.35 g/l of ethanol was obtained within 22 h by using yeast inoculum of 13.9 g/l. No differences in fermentation rates or ethanol yields were observed when whole or deproteinized whey solutions were used. Concentrated whey permeates, obtained after removal of the valuable proteins from whey, can be effectively fermented for ethanol production.