Competitive Mechanisms for Inhibition of Sulfate Reduction and Methane Production in the Zone of Ferric Iron Reduction in Sediments

Mechanisms for inhibition of sulfate reduction and methane production in the zone of Fe(III) reduction in sediments were investigated. Addition of amorphic iron(III) oxyhydroxide to sediments in which sulfate reduction was the predominant terminal electron-accepting process inhibited sulfate reduction 86 to 100%. The decrease in electron flow to sulfate reduction was accompanied by a corresponding increase in electron flow to Fe(III) reduction. In a similar manner, Fe(III) additions also inhibited methane production in sulfate-depleted sediments. The inhibition of sulfate reduction and methane production was the result of substrate limitation, because the sediments retained the potential for sulfate reduction and methane production in the presence of excess hydrogen and acetate. Sediments in which Fe(III) reduction was the predominant terminal electron-accepting process had much lower concentrations of hydrogen and acetate than sediments in which sulfate reduction or methane production was the predominant terminal process. The low concentrations of hydrogen and acetate in the Fe(III)-reducing sediments were the result of metabolism by Fe(III)-reducing organisms of hydrogen and acetate at concentrations lower than sulfate reducers or methanogens could metabolize them. The results indicate that when Fe(III) is in a form that Fe(III)-reducing organisms can readily reduce, Fe(III)-reducing organisms can inhibit sulfate reduction and methane production by outcompeting sulfate reducers and methanogens for electron donors.     

Kinetic Analysis of Competition Between Sulfate Reducers and Methanogens for Hydrogen in Sediments

The competition between sulfate-reducing and methanogenic bacteria for hydrogen was investigated in eutrophic lake sediments that contained low in situ sulfate concentrations and in sulfate-amended sediments. Sulfate reduction and methane production coexisted in situ in lake surface sediments (0 to 2 cm), but methane production was the dominant terminal process. Addition of 10 to 20 mM sulfate to sediments resulted in a decrease in the hydrogen partial pressure and a concomitant inhibition of methane production over time. Molybdate inhibition of sulfate reduction in sulfate-amended sediments was followed by an increase in the hydrogen partial pressure and the methane production rate to values comparable to those in sediments not amended with sulfate. The sulfate reducer population had a half-saturation constant for hydrogen uptake of 141 pascals versus 597 pascals for the methanogen population. Thus, when sulfate was not limiting, the lower half-saturation constant of sulfate reducers enabled them to inhibit methane production by lowering the hydrogen partial pressure below levels that methanogens could effectively utilize. However, methanogens coexisted with sulfate reducers in the presence of sulfate, and the outcome of competition at any time was a function of the rate of hydrogen production, the relative population sizes, and sulfate availability.     

Sulfate reduction in methanogenic bioreactors

Abstract: In the anaerobic treatment of sulfate-containing wastewater, sulfate reduction interferes with methanogenesis. Both mutualistic and competitive interactions between sulfate-reducing bacteria and methanogenic bacteria have been observed. Sulfate reducers will compete with methanogens for the common substrates hydrogen, formate and acetate. In general, sulfate reducers have better growth kinetic properties than methanogens, but additional factors which may be of importance in the competition are adherence properties, mixed substrate utilization, affinity for sulfate of sulfate reducers, relative numbers of bacteria, and reactor conditions such as pH, temperature and sulfide concentration. Sulfate reducers also compete with syntrophic methanogenic consortia involved in the degradation of substrates like propionate and butyrate. In the absence of sulfate these methanogenic consortia are very important, but in the presence of sulfate they are thought to be easily outcompeted by sulfate reducers. However, at relatively low sulfate concentrations, syntrophic degradation of propionate and butyrate coupled to HZ removal via sulfate reduction rather than via methanogenesis may become important. A remarkable feature of some sulfate reducers is their ability to grow fermentatively or to grow in syntrophic association with methanogens in the absence of sulfate.     

Metabolism of Trimethylamine, Choline, and Glycine Betaine by Sulfate-Reducing and Methanogenic Bacteria in Marine Sediments

The response of methanogenesis and sulfate reduction to trimethylamine, choline, and glycine betaine was examined in surface sediments from the intertidal region of Lowes Cove, Maine. Addition of these substrates markedly stimulated methanogenesis in the presence of active sulfate reduction, whereas addition of other substrates, including glucose, acetate, and glycine, had no effect on methane production. Sulfate reduction was stimulated simultaneously with methanogenesis by the various quaternary amines and all other substrates examined. Incubation of exogenous trimethylamine, choline, or glycine betaine with either bromoethane sulfonic acid or sodium molybdate was used to establish pathways of degradation of the substrates. Methanogenesis dominated the metabolism of trimethylamine, although limited nonmethanogenic activity, perhaps by sulfate-reducing bacteria, was observed. Acetate was oxidized primarily by sulfate reducers. Both choline and glycine betaine were fermented stoichiometrically to acetate and trimethylamine; apparently, neither substrate could be utilized directly by methanogens or sulfate reducers, and the activities of fermenters, methanogens, and sulfate reducers were all required to effect complete mineralization. These observations support the hypothesis that the presence of quaternary amines can mediate the coexistence of sulfate reduction and methanogenesis in marine surface sediments; they also implicate methanogens in the nitrogen cycle of marine sediments containing quaternary amines.     

Methanogenesis and Sulfate Reduction: Competitive and Noncompetitive Substrates in Estuarine Sediments

Sulfate ions did not inhibit methanogenesis in estuarine sediments supplemented with methanol, trimethylamine, or methionine. However, sulfate greatly retarded methanogenesis when hydrogen or acetate was the substrate. Sulfate reduction was stimulated by acetate, hydrogen, and acetate plus hydrogen, but not by methanol or trimethylamine. These results indicate that sulfate-reducing bacteria will outcompete methanogens for hydrogen, acetate, or both, but will not compete with methanogens for compounds like methanol, trimethylamine, or methionine, thereby allowing methanogenesis and sulfate reduction to operate simultaneously within anoxic, sulfate-containing sediments.     

Anaerobic Microflora of Everglades Sediments: Effects of Nutrients on Population Profiles and Activities

Everglades sediments (wetland soils) near sources of agricultural runoff had low redox potentials, were blackened with sulfide, and displayed high porewater phosphorus (total) concentrations and high water column conductivities. These sediments yielded 10(sup3)- to 10(sup4)-fold-higher numbers of culturable anaerobes, including methanogens, sulfate reducers, and acetate producers, than did sediments from Everglades and Lake Okeechobee comparative control sites not as directly associated with agricultural runoff. These observations demonstrated that there was a general, rather than specific, enhancement of the anaerobic microflora in the sediments most likely influenced by agricultural runoff. Despite these differences in microfloral patterns, methylmercury and total mercury levels were similar among these contrasting sediments. Although available sulfate and phosphorus appeared to stimulate the productivity of sulfate reducers in Everglades sediments, the number of culturable sulfate reducers did not directly correspond to the concentration of sulfate and phosphorus in porewaters. Microcosms supplemented with sulfate, nitrate, and phosphate altered the initial capacities of the sediment microflora to produce acetate and methane from endogenous matter. For sediments nearest sources of agricultural runoff, phosphorus temporarily enhanced acetate formation and initially suppressed methane production, sulfate enhanced acetate formation but did not significantly alter the production of methane, and nitrate totally suppressed the initial production of both methane and acetate. In regards to the latter, microbes capable of dissimilating nitrate to ammonium were present in greater culturable numbers than denitrifiers. In microcosms, acetate was a major source of methane, and supplemental hydrogen was directed towards the synthesis of acetate via CO(inf2)-dependent acetogenesis. These findings demonstrate that Everglades sediments nearest agricultural runoff have enhanced anaerobic microbial profiles and that the anaerobic microflora are poised to respond rapidly to phosphate, sulfate, and nitrate input.     

Effect of 2-bromo-ethane sulfonate, molybdate and chloroform on acetate consumption by methanogenic and sulfate-reducing populations in freshwater sediment

The relative importance of methanogenesis and sulfate reduction in freshwater sediment supplemented with acetate was investigated. Addition of acetate stimulated both methane formation and sulfate reduction, indicating that an active aceticlastic population of methanogens and sulfate reducers was present in the sediment. Sulfate reducers were most important in the consumption of acetate. However, when sulfate reducers were inhibited, acetate was metabolised at a similar rate by methanogens. Acetate, propionate and valerate accumulated only when both processes were inhibited by the combined addition of 2-bromo-ethane sulfonate and molybdate. The relative amounts of acetate, propionate and valerate were 93, 6 and 1 mol%, respectively. These results demonstrate the role of acetate as a key intermediate in the terminal step of organic matter mineralisation in the sediment. Addition of chloroform inhibited both methanogenesis and sulfate reduction. We studied the inhibitory effect of CHCl(3) on homoacetogenic bacteria, sulfate-reducing bacteria and methanogens. The results showed that inhibition by CHCl(3) correlates with microorganisms, which operate the acetyl-CoA cleavage pathway. We propose that chloroform can be used to elucidate the role of different metabolic types of sulfate reducers to sulfate reduction in natural environments.     

Methanogenesis from Methanol and Methylamines and Acetogenesis from Hydrogen and Carbon Dioxide in the Sediments of a Eutrophic Lake

¹⁴C-tracer techniques were used to examine the metabolism of methanol and methylamines and acetogenesis from hydrogen and carbon dioxide in sediments from the profundal and littoral zones of eutrophic Wintergreen Lake, Michigan. Methanogens were primarily responsible for the metabolism of methanol, monomethylamine, and trimethylamine and maintained the pool size of these substrates below 10 μM in both sediment types. Methanol and methylamines were the precursors for less than 5 and 1%, respectively, of the total methane produced. Methanol and methylamines continued to be metabolized to methane when the sulfate concentration in the sediment was increased to 20 mM. Less than 2% of the total acetate production was derived from carbon dioxide reduction. Hydrogen consumption by hydrogen-oxidizing acetogens was 5% or less of the total hydrogen uptake by acetogens and methanogens. These results, in conjunction with previous studies, emphasize that acetate and hydrogen are the major methane precursors and that methanogens are the predominant hydrogen consumers in the sediments of this eutrophic lake.     

Metabolism of reduced methylated sulfur compounds in anaerobic sediments and by a pure culture of an estuarine methanogen

Addition of dimethylsulfide (DMS), dimethyldisulfide (DMDS), or methane thiol (MSH) to a diversity of anoxic aquatic sediments (e.g., fresh water, estuarine, alkaline/hypersaline) stimulated methane production. The yield of methane recovered from DMS was often 52 to 63%, although high concentrations of DMS (as well as MSH and DMDS) inhibited methanogenesis in some types of sediments. Production of methane from these reduced methylated sulfur compounds was blocked by 2-bromoethanesulfonic acid. Sulfate did not influence the metabolism of millimolar levels of DMS, DMDS, or MSH added to sediments. However, when DMS was added at approximately 2-muM levels as [C]DMS, metabolism by sediments resulted in a CH(4)/CO(2) ratio of only 0.06. Addition of molybdate increased the ratio to 1.8, while 2-bromoethanesulfonic acid decreased it to 0, but did not block CO(2) production. These results indicate the methanogens and sulfate reducers compete for DMS when it is present at low concentrations; however, at high concentrations, DMS is a "noncompetitive" substrate for methanogens. Metabolism of DMS by sediments resulted in the appearance of MSH as a transient intermediate. A pure culture of an obligately methylotrophic estuarine methanogen was isolated which was capable of growth on DMS. Metabolism of DMS by the culture also resulted in the transient appearance of MSH, but the organism could grow on neither MSH nor DMDS. The culture metabolized [C]-DMS to yield a CH(4)/CO(2) ratio of approximately 2.8. Reduced methylated sulfur compounds represent a new class of substrates for methanogens and may be potential precursors of methane in a variety of aquatic habitats.     

Substrates for Sulfate Reduction and Methane Production in Intertidal Sediments

The activity of and potential substrates for methane-producing bacteria and sulfate-reducing bacteria were examined in marsh, estuary, and beach intertidal sediments. Slow rates of methane production were detected in all sediments, although rates of sulfate reduction were 100- to 1,000-fold higher. After sulfate was depleted in sediments, the rates of methane production sharply increased. The addition of methylamine stimulated methanogenesis in the presence of sulfate, and [¹⁴C]methylamine was rapidly converted to ¹⁴CH₄ and ¹⁴CO₂ in freshly collected marsh sediment. Acetate, hydrogen, or methionine additions did not stimulate methanogenesis. [methyl-¹⁴C]methionine and [2-¹⁴C]acetate were converted to ¹⁴CO₂ and not to ¹⁴CH₄ in fresh sediment. No reduction of ¹⁴CO₂ to ¹⁴CH₄ occurred in fresh sediment. Molybdate, an inhibitor of sulfate reduction, inhibited [2-¹⁴C]acetate metabolism by 98.5%. Fluoracetate, an inhibitor of acetate metabolism, inhibited sulfate reduction by 61%. These results suggest that acetate is a major electron donor for sulfate reduction in marine sediments. In the presence of high concentrations of sulfate, methane may be derived from novel substrates such as methylamine.     

Hydrogen 'leakage' during methanogenesis from methanol and methylamine: implications for anaerobic carbon degradation pathways in aquatic sediments

The effect of variations in H2 concentrations on methanogenesis from the non-competitive substrates methanol and methylamine (used by methanogens but not by sulfate reducers) was investigated in methanogenic marine sediments. Imposed variations in sulfate concentration and temperature were used to drive systematic variations in pore water H2 concentrations. Specifically, increasing sulfate concentrations and decreasing temperatures both resulted in decreasing H2 concentrations. The ratio of CO2 and CH4 produced from 14C-labelled methylamine and methanol showed a direct correlation with the H2 concentration, independent of the treatment, with lower H2 concentrations resulting in a shift towards CO2. We conclude that this correlation is driven by production of H2 by methylotrophic methanogens, followed by loss to the environment with a magnitude dependent on the extracellular H2 concentrations maintained by hydrogenotrophic methanogens (in the case of the temperature experiment) or sulfate reducers (in the case of the sulfate experiment). Under sulfate-free conditions, the loss of reducing power as H2 flux out of the cell represents a loss of energy for the methylotrophic methanogens while, in the presence of sulfate, it results in a favourable free energy yield. Thus, hydrogen leakage might conceivably be beneficial for methanogens in marine sediments dominated by sulfate reduction. In low-sulfate systems such as methanogenic marine or freshwater sediments it is clearly detrimental--an adverse consequence of possessing a hydrogenase that is subject to externally imposed control by pore water H2 concentrations. H2 leakage in methanogens may explain the apparent exclusion of acetoclastic methanogenesis in sediments dominated by sulfate reduction.     

End Products of Anaerobic Chitin Degradation by Salt Marsh Bacteria as Substrates for Dissimilatory Sulfate Reduction and Methanogenesis

The anaerobic pathway of chitin decomposition by chitinoclastic bacteria was examined with an emphasis on end product coupling to other salt marsh bacteria. Actively growing chitinoclastic bacterial isolates produced primarily acetate, H₂, and CO₂ in broth culture. No sulfate-reducing or methanogenic isolates grew on chitin as sole carbon source or produced any measurable degradation products. Mixed cultures of chitin degraders with sulfate reducers resulted in positive sulfide production. Mixed cultures of chitin-degrading isolates with methanogens resulted in the production of CH₄ with reductions in headspace CO₂ and H₂. The combination of all three metabolic types resulted in the simultaneous production of methane and sulfide, with more methane being produced in mixed cultures containing CO₂-reducing methanogens and acetoclastic sulfate reducers because of less interspecific H₂ competition.     

Inhibition Experiments on Anaerobic Methane Oxidation

Anaerobic methane oxidation is a general process important in controlling fluxes of methane from anoxic marine sediments. The responsible organism has not been isolated, and little is known about the electron acceptors and substrates involved in the process. Laboratory evidence indicates that sulfate reducers and methanogens are able to oxidize small quantities of methane. Field evidence suggests anaerobic methane oxidation may be linked to sulfate reduction. Experiments with specific inhibitors for sulfate reduction (molybdate), methanogenesis (2-bromoethanesulfonic acid), and acetate utilization (fluoroacetate) were performed on marine sediments from the zone of methane oxidation to determine whether sulfate-reducing bacteria or methanogenic bacteria are responsible for methane oxidation. The inhibition experiment results suggest that methane oxidation in anoxic marine sediments is not directly mediated by sulfate-reducing bacteria or methanogenic bacteria. Our results are consistent with two possibilities: anaerobic methane oxidation may be mediated by an unknown organism or a consortium involving an unknown methane oxidizer and sulfate-reducing bacteria.     

Partitioning effects during terminal carbon and electron flow in sediments of a low-salinity meltwater pond near Bratina Island, McMurdo Ice Shelf, Antarctica

A study of anaerobic sediments below cyanobacterial mats of a low-salinity meltwater pond called Orange Pond on the McMurdo Ice Shelf at temperatures simulating those in the summer season (<5 degrees C) revealed that both sulfate reduction and methane production were important terminal anaerobic processes. Addition of [2-(14)C]acetate to sediment samples resulted in the passage of label mainly to CO(2). Acetate addition (0 to 27 mM) had little effect on methanogenesis (a 1.1-fold increase), and while the rate of acetate dissimilation was greater than the rate of methane production (6.4 nmol cm(-3) h(-1) compared to 2.5 to 6 nmol cm(-3) h(-1)), the portion of methane production attributed to acetate cleavage was <2%. Substantial increases in the methane production rate were observed with H(2) (2.4-fold), and H(2) uptake was totally accounted for by methane production under physiological conditions. Formate also stimulated methane production (twofold), presumably through H(2) release mediated through hydrogen lyase. Addition of sulfate up to 50-fold the natural levels in the sediment (interstitial concentration, approximately 0.3 mM) did not substantially inhibit methanogenesis, but the process was inhibited by 50-fold chloride (36 mM). No net rate of methane oxidation was observed when sediments were incubated anaerobically, and denitrification rates were substantially lower than rates for sulfate reduction and methanogenesis. The results indicate that carbon flow from acetate is coupled mainly to sulfate reduction and that methane is largely generated from H(2) and CO(2) where chloride, but not sulfate, has a modulating role. Rates of methanogenesis at in situ temperatures were four- to fivefold less than maximal rates found at 20 degrees C.     

Microbial ecology of a shallow unconfined ground water aquifer polluted by municipal landfill leachate

The microflora of a shallow anoxic aquifer underlying a municipal landfill in Oklahoma was characterized by direct light microscopy, most probable number determinations of sulfate reducers and methanogens, and measurements of methanogenesis in aquifer samples containing either endogenous or exogenous electron donors and various sulfate concentrations. Acridine orange direct counts of bacteria did not vary significantly with time or between 2 major sampling areas (1.70±0.16×10⁷ to 11.2±2.1×10⁷ cells/gdw). One site (B) was high in organic matter and low in sulfate, and methanogens generally outnumbered sulfate-reducers at most times of the year, whereas the opposite was true for another site (A). Greater than 75% of the theoretical amount of methane was detected within 7 weeks in both site A and B aquifer slurries amended with noncompetitive electron donors like methanol and trimethylamine. However, only site B slurries efficiently converted competitive donors like acetate, H₂, and formate to the expected amount of methane. A mapping of sulfate and methane levels indicated that site A is relatively localized. These results suggest that the predominant flow of carbon and energy is through methanogenesis at aquifer site B whereas sulfate reduction predominated at site A. However, both methanogens and sulfate reducers could be isolated from either site.     

Benzene Oxidation Coupled to Sulfate Reduction

Highly reduced sediments from San Diego Bay, Calif., that were incubated under strictly anaerobic conditions metabolized benzene within 55 days when they were exposed initially to 1 (mu)M benzene. The rate of benzene metabolism increased as benzene was added back to the benzene-adapted sediments. When a [(sup14)C]benzene tracer was included with the benzene added to benzene-adapted sediments, 92% of the added radioactivity was recovered as (sup14)CO(inf2). Molybdate, an inhibitor of sulfate reduction, inhibited benzene uptake and production of (sup14)CO(inf2) from [(sup14)C]benzene. Benzene metabolism stopped when the sediments became sulfate depleted, and benzene uptake resumed when sulfate was added again. The stoichiometry of benzene uptake and sulfate reduction was consistent with the hypothesis that sulfate was the principal electron acceptor for benzene oxidation. Isotope trapping experiments performed with [(sup14)C]benzene revealed that there was no production of such potential extracellular intermediates of benzene oxidation as phenol, benzoate, p-hydroxybenzoate, cyclohexane, catechol, and acetate. The results demonstrate that benzene can be oxidized in the absence of O(inf2), with sulfate serving as the electron acceptor, and suggest that some sulfate reducers are capable of completely oxidizing benzene to carbon dioxide without the production of extracellular intermediates. Although anaerobic benzene oxidation coupled to chelated Fe(III) has been documented previously, the study reported here provides the first example of a natural sediment compound that can serve as an electron acceptor for anaerobic benzene oxidation.     

Fatty acid oxidation in anoxic marine sediments: the importance of hydrogen sensitive reactions

In anoxic marine sediments fatty acids may be oxidized directly by sulfate reducing bacteria, or may be oxidized by pathways which result in hydrogen production. Some of these latter reactions are quite sensitive to hydrogen concentrations ... in other words if hydrogen concentrations become elevated, fatty acid oxidation will cease. Thus sulfate reducers may actually play two important roles in the metabolism of fatty acids in marine sediments. The sulfate reducers both can utilize fatty acids directly, and also can oxidize hydrogen and thus control hydrogen partial pressures in the sediments. Therefore sulfate reducers may act indirectly to facilitate fatty acid oxidation by hydrogen-producing pathways. We carried out a series of incubations of slurried salt marsh sediment under high and low hydrogen partial pressures and in the presence and absence of molybdate to investigate the relative importance of sulfate reducers and other bacteria mediating hydrogen-sensitive reactions. Our results suggest that both classes of bacteria contribute significantly to fatty acid turnover in marine sediments. Studies of low molecular weight fatty acid turnover in sediment must explicitly recognize that manipulation of sediment (including addition of molydbate to inhibit sulfate reducers) may have a large impact on hydrogen partial pressures in sediment, and may thus significantly alter the pathways and/or rates of fatty acid turnover.     

Diversity of dimethylsulfide-degrading methanogens and sulfate-reducing bacteria in anoxic sediments along the Medway Estuary,UK

Methane is a powerful greenhouse gas but the microbial diversity mediating methylotrophic methanogenesis is not well-characterized. One overlooked route to methane is via the degradation of dimethylsulfide (DMS), an abundant organosulfur compound in the environment. Methanogens and sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) can degrade DMS in anoxic sediments depending on sulfate availability. However, we know little about the underlying microbial community and how sulfate availability affects DMS degradation in anoxic sediments. We studied DMS-dependent methane production along the salinity gradient of the Medway Estuary (UK) and characterized, for the first time, the DMS-degrading methanogens and SRB using cultivation-independent tools. DMS metabolism resulted in high methane yield (39%–42% of the theoretical methane yield) in anoxic sediments regardless of their sulfate content. Methanomethylovorans, Methanolobus and Methanococcoides were dominant methanogens in freshwater, brackish and marine incubations respectively, suggesting niche-partitioning of the methanogens likely driven by DMS amendment and sulfate concentrations. Adding DMS also led to significant changes in SRB composition and abundance in the sediments. Increases in the abundance of Sulfurimonas and SRB suggest cryptic sulfur cycling coupled to DMS degradation. Our study highlights a potentially important pathway to methane production in sediments with contrasting sulfate content and sheds light on the diversity of DMS degraders.     

Hydrogenogenic CO conversion in a moderately thermophilic (55 degrees C) sulfate-fed gas lift reactor: competition for CO-derived H(2)

Thermophilic (55 degrees C) sulfate reduction in a gas lift reactor fed with CO gas as the sole electron donor was investigated. The reactor was inoculated with mesophilic granular sludge with a high activity of CO conversion to hydrogen and carbon dioxide at 55 degrees C. Strong competition for H(2) was observed between methanogens and sulfate reducers, while the homoacetogens present consumed only small amounts of H(2). The methanogens appeared to be more sensitive to pH and temperature shocks imposed to the reactor, but could not be completely eliminated. The fast growth rates of the methanogens (generation time of 4.5 h) enabled them to recover fast from shocks, and they rapidly consumed more than 90% of the CO-derived H(2). Nevertheless, steep increases in sulfide production in periods with low methane production suggests that once methanogenesis is eliminated, sulfate reduction with CO-rich gas as electron donor has great potential for thermophilic biodesulfurization.