Uncoupling of bait‐protein expression from the prey protein environment adds versatility for cell and tissue interaction proteomics and reveals a complex of CARP‐1 and the PKA Cβ1 subunit

An expression‐uncoupled tandem affinity purification assay is introduced which differs from the standard TAP assay by uncoupling the expression of the TAP‐bait protein from the target cells. Here, the TAP‐tagged bait protein is expressed in Escherichia coli and purified. The two concatenated purification steps of the classical TAP are performed after addition of the purified bait to brain tissue homogenates, cell and nuclear extracts. Without prior genetic manipulation of the target, upscaling, free choice of cell compartments and avoidance of expression triggered heat shock responses could be achieved in one go. By the strategy of separating bait expression from the prey protein environment numerous established, mostly tissue‐specific binding partners of the protein kinase A catalytic subunit Cβ1 were identified, including interactions in binary, ternary and quaternary complexes. In addition, the previously unknown small molecule inhibitor‐dependent interaction of Cβ1 with the cell cycle and apoptosis regulatory protein‐1 was verified. The uncoupled tandem affinity purification procedure presented here expands the application range of the in vivo TAP assay and may serve as a simple strategy for identifying cell‐ and tissue‐specific protein complexes.     

Mass spectrometry in plant proteomic analysis

Abstract

The current revolution in proteomics has been generated by the combination of very sensitive mass spectrometers coupled to microcapillary liquid chromatography, specific proteolysis of protein mixtures and software that is capable of searching vast numbers of mass measurements against predicted peptides from sequenced genomes. The challenges of post‐genomic plant biology include characterization of protein function, post‐translational modifications and composition of protein complexes as well as deciphering protein complements in intracellular compartments – proteomes of cell organelles. In this review we summarize the current mass spectrometry methods currently being used in plant proteomics and discuss the various tagging strategies that are being used for purification and proteomic analysis of plant protein complexes.

Abbreviations: BCCD, biotin carboxyl carrier protein domain; CBP, calmodulin‐binding protein; CID, collision‐induced dissociation; ESI, electrospray ionization; EST, expressed sequence tag; FT‐ICR, Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance; GFP, green fluorescent protein; GST, glutathione S‐transferase; HA, haemagglutinin; HILEP, hydroponic isotope labelling of entire plants; His, histidine; HPB, HA–PreScission–Biotin; HPLC, high‐performance liquid chromatography; ICAT, isotope‐coded affinity tags; ICPL, isotope‐coded protein label; iTRAQ, isobaric tag for relative and absolute quantification; LC, liquid chromatography; MALDI, matrix‐assisted laser desorption ionization; MBP, maltose‐binding protein; MS, mass spectrometry; SDS‐PAGE, sodium dodecyl sulphate‐polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; SILAC, stable isotope labelling with amino acids in cell culture; SILIP, stable isotope labelling in planta; Strep, streptavidin; TAP, tandem affinity purification; TBP, TATA‐box‐binding protein; TOF, time‐of‐flight; UPLC, ultraperformance liquid chromatography     

Simple protein complex purification and identification method for high-throughput mapping of protein interaction networks

Most current methods for purification and identification of protein complexes use endogenous expression of affinity-tagged bait, tandem affinity tag purification of protein complexes followed by specific elution of complexes from beads, and gel separation and in-gel digestion prior to mass spectrometric analysis of protein interactors. We propose a single affinity tag in vitro pull-down assay with denaturing elution, trypsin digestion in organic solvent, and LC-ESI MS/MS protein identification using SEQUEST analysis. Our method is simple and easy to scale-up and automate, making it suitable for high-throughput mapping of protein interaction networks and functional proteomics.     

Labeling, detection and identification of newly synthesized proteomes with bioorthogonal non-canonical amino-acid tagging

A major aim of proteomics is the identification of proteins in a given proteome at a given metabolic state. This protocol describes the step-by-step labeling, purification and detection of newly synthesized proteins in mammalian cells using the non-canonical amino acid azidohomoalanine (AHA). In this method, metabolic labeling of newly synthesized proteins with AHA endows them with the unique chemical functionality of the azide group. In the subsequent click chemistry tagging reaction, azide-labeled proteins are covalently coupled to an alkyne-bearing affinity tag. After avidin-based affinity purification and on-resin trypsinization, the resulting peptide mixture is subjected to tandem mass spectrometry for identification. In combination with deuterated leucine-based metabolic colabeling, candidate proteins can be immediately validated. Bioorthogonal non-canonical amino-acid tagging can be combined with any subcellular fractionation, immunopurification or other proteomic method to identify specific subproteomes, thereby reducing sample complexity and enabling the identification of subtle changes in a proteome. This protocol can be completed in 5 days.     

Amino acid-coded tagging approaches in quantitative proteomics

To improve the efficiency, accuracy, reproducibility, throughput and proteome coverage of mass spectrometry-based quantitative approaches, both in vitro and in vivo tagging of particular amino acid residues of cellular proteins have been introduced to assist mass spectrometry for global-scale comparative studies of differentially expressed proteins/modifications between different biologically relevant cell states or cells at different pathological states. The basic features of these methods introduce pair-wise isotope signals of each individual peptide containing a particular type of tagged amino acid (amino acid-coded mass tagging) that originated from different cell states. In this review, the applications of major amino acid-coded mass tagging-based quantitative proteomics approaches, including isotope-coded affinity tag, isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantification (iTRAQ?) and stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture are summarized in the context of their respective strengths/weakness in identifying those differentially expressed or post-translational modified proteins regulated by particular cellular stress on a genomic scale in a high-throughput manner. Importantly, these gel-free, in-spectra quantitative mechanisms have been further explored to identify/characterize large-scale protein–protein interactions involving various functional pathways. Taken together, the information about quantitative proteome changes, including multiple regulated proteins and their interconnected relationships, will provide an important insight into the molecular mechanisms, where novel targets for diagnosis and therapeutic intervention will be identified.     

ASG2 is a farnesylated DWD protein that acts as ABA negative regulator in Arabidopsis

The tagging‐via‐substrate approach designed for the capture of mammal prenylated proteins was adapted to Arabidopsis cell culture. In this way, proteins are in vivo tagged with an azide‐modified farnesyl moiety and captured thanks to biotin alkyne Click‐iT® chemistry with further streptavidin‐affinity chromatography. Mass spectrometry analyses identified four small GTPases and ASG2 (ALTERED SEED GERMINATION 2), a protein previously associated to the seed germination gene network. ASG2 is a conserved protein in plants and displays a unique feature that associates WD40 domains and tetratricopeptide repeats. Additionally, we show that ASG2 has a C‐terminal CaaX‐box that is farnesylated in vitro. Protoplast transfections using CaaX prenyltransferase mutants show that farnesylation provokes ASG2 nucleus exclusion. Moreover, ASG2 interacts with DDB1 (DAMAGE DNA BINDING protein 1), and the subcellular localization of this complex depends on ASG2 farnesylation status. Finally, germination and root elongation experiments reveal that asg2 and the farnesyltransferase mutant era1 (ENHANCED RESPONSE TO ABSCISIC ACID (ABA) 1) behave in similar manners when exposed to ABA or salt stress. To our knowledge, ASG2 is the first farnesylated DWD (DDB1 binding WD40) protein related to ABA response in Arabidopsis that may be linked to era1 phenotypes.     

Identifying specific protein interaction partners using quantitative mass spectrometry and bead proteomes

The identification of interaction partners in protein complexes is a major goal in cell biology. Here we present a reliable affinity purification strategy to identify specific interactors that combines quantitative SILAC-based mass spectrometry with characterization of common contaminants binding to affinity matrices (bead proteomes). This strategy can be applied to affinity purification of either tagged fusion protein complexes or endogenous protein complexes, illustrated here using the well-characterized SMN complex as a model. GFP is used as the tag of choice because it shows minimal nonspecific binding to mammalian cell proteins, can be quantitatively depleted from cell extracts, and allows the integration of biochemical protein interaction data with in vivo measurements using fluorescence microscopy. Proteins binding nonspecifically to the most commonly used affinity matrices were determined using quantitative mass spectrometry, revealing important differences that affect experimental design. These data provide a specificity filter to distinguish specific protein binding partners in both quantitative and nonquantitative pull-down and immunoprecipitation experiments.     

Recombinant tagging system using ribosomal frameshifting to monitor protein expression

For rapid and accurate quantitation of recombinant proteins during expression and after purification, we introduce a new tagging strategy that expresses both target proteins and limitedly tagged target proteins together in a single cell at a constant ratio by utilizing cis‐elements of programmed ‐1 ribosomal frameshifting (‐1RFS) as an embedded device. ‐1RFS is an alternative reading mechanism that effectively controls protein expression by many viruses. When a target gene is fused to the enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) gene with a ‐1RFS element implanted between them, the unfused target and the target‐GFP fusion proteins are expressed at a fixed ratio. The expression ratio between these two protein products is adjustable simply by changing ‐1RFS signals. This limited‐tagging system would be valuable for the real‐time monitoring of protein expression when optimizing expression condition for a new protein, and in monitoring large‐scale bioprocesses without a large metabolic burden on host cells. Furthermore, this strategy allows for the direct measurement of the quantity of a protein on a chip surface and easy application to proteomewide study of gene products. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2013; 110: 898–904. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

A novel S3S‐TAP‐tag for the isolation of T‐cell interaction partners of adhesion and degranulation promoting adaptor protein

The identification of modular units of cellular function is a major goal for proteomic research. Protein complexes represent important building blocks defining functionality and deciphering their composition remains a major challenge. Here, we have designed a new tandem affinity purification (TAP) tag (termed S3S‐tag) for the isolation of protein complexes. Specifically, the immune cell protein ADAP that regulates integrin adhesion was fused either C‐ or N‐terminally to the S3S‐tag. After retroviral transduction of a vector containing S3S‐tagged ADAP and internal ribosomal entry site encoded enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP), Jurkat T cells were sorted according to eGFP expression and further selected for expression of TAP‐tagged protein close to endogenous levels. The combination of a cleavable S‐tag and a Strep‐tag II allowed for the isolation of ADAP and associated proteins. Subsequently, stable isotope labeling with amino acids in cell culture‐based mass spectrometric analysis was performed to identify potentially specific interaction partners. Co‐purification of the known interaction partner Src kinase‐associated phosphoprotein of 55 kDa indicates the validity of our approach, while the identification of the ENA/VASP family member EVL, the guanine nucleotide exchange factor GEF‐H1 and the adaptor protein DOCK2 corroborates a link between ADAP‐mediated integrin regulation and the cytoskeleton.     

Mapping protein interactions of sodium channel NaV1.7 using epitope‐tagged gene‐targeted mice

The voltage‐gated sodium channel Na_V1.7 plays a critical role in pain pathways. We generated an epitope‐tagged Na_V1.7 mouse that showed normal pain behaviours to identify channel‐interacting proteins. Analysis of Na_V1.7 complexes affinity‐purified under native conditions by mass spectrometry revealed 267 proteins associated with Nav1.7 in vivo. The sodium channel β3 (Scn3b), rather than the β1 subunit, complexes with Nav1.7, and we demonstrate an interaction between collapsing‐response mediator protein (Crmp2) and Nav1.7, through which the analgesic drug lacosamide regulates Nav1.7 current density. Novel Na_V1.7 protein interactors including membrane‐trafficking protein synaptotagmin‐2 (Syt2), L‐type amino acid transporter 1 (Lat1) and transmembrane P24‐trafficking protein 10 (Tmed10) together with Scn3b and Crmp2 were validated by co‐immunoprecipitation (Co‐IP) from sensory neuron extract. Nav1.7, known to regulate opioid receptor efficacy, interacts with the G protein‐regulated inducer of neurite outgrowth (Gprin1), an opioid receptor‐binding protein, demonstrating a physical and functional link between Nav1.7 and opioid signalling. Further information on physiological interactions provided with this normal epitope‐tagged mouse should provide useful insights into the many functions now associated with the Na_V1.7 channel.     

Targeted tandem affinity purification of PSD‐95 recovers core postsynaptic complexes and schizophrenia susceptibility proteins

The molecular complexity of mammalian proteomes demands new methods for mapping the organization of multiprotein complexes. Here, we combine mouse genetics and proteomics to characterize synapse protein complexes and interaction networks. New tandem affinity purification (TAP) tags were fused to the carboxyl terminus of PSD‐95 using gene targeting in mice. Homozygous mice showed no detectable abnormalities in PSD‐95 expression, subcellular localization or synaptic electrophysiological function. Analysis of multiprotein complexes purified under native conditions by mass spectrometry defined known and new interactors: 118 proteins comprising crucial functional components of synapses, including glutamate receptors, K⁺ channels, scaffolding and signaling proteins, were recovered. Network clustering of protein interactions generated five connected clusters, with two clusters containing all the major ionotropic glutamate receptors and one cluster with voltage‐dependent K⁺ channels. Annotation of clusters with human disease associations revealed that multiple disorders map to the network, with a significant correlation of schizophrenia within the glutamate receptor clusters. This targeted TAP tagging strategy is generally applicable to mammalian proteomics and systems biology approaches to disease.     

High-throughput Gene Tagging in Trypanosoma brucei

Improvements in mass spectrometry, sequencing and bioinformatics have generated large datasets of potentially interesting genes. Tagging these proteins can give insights into their function by determining their localization within the cell and enabling interaction partner identification. We recently published a fast and scalable method to generate Trypanosoma brucei cell lines that express a tagged protein from the endogenous locus. The method was based on a plasmid we generated that, when coupled with long primer PCR, can be used to modify a gene to encode a protein tagged at either terminus. This allows the tagging of dozens of trypanosome proteins in parallel, facilitating the large-scale validation of candidate genes of interest. This system can be used to tag proteins for localization (using a fluorescent protein, epitope tag or electron microscopy tag) or biochemistry (using tags for purification, such as the TAP (tandem affinity purification) tag). Here, we describe a protocol to perform the long primer PCR and the electroporation in 96-well plates, with the recovery and selection of transgenic trypanosomes occurring in 24-well plates. With this workflow, hundreds of proteins can be tagged in parallel; this is an order of magnitude improvement to our previous protocol and genome scale tagging is now possible.     

Protein interactions with the platelet integrin αIIb regulatory motif

Integrins are transmembrane proteins regulating cellular shape, mobility and the cell cycle. A highly conserved signature motif in the cytoplasmic tail of the integrin α‐subunit, KXGFFKR, plays a critical role in regulating integrin function. To date, six proteins have been identified that target this motif of the platelet‐specific integrin α_IIbβ₃. We employ peptide‐affinity chromatography followed‐up with LC‐MS/MS analysis as well as protein chips to identify new potential regulators of integrin function in platelets and put them into their biological context using information from protein:protein interaction (PPI) databases. Totally, 44 platelet proteins bind with high affinity to an immobilized LAMWKVGFFKR‐peptide. Of these, seven have been reported in the PPI literature as interactors with integrin α‐subunits. 68 recombinant human proteins expressed on the protein chip specifically bind with high affinity to biotin‐tagged α‐integrin cytoplasmic peptides. Two of these proteins are also identified in the peptide‐affinity experiments, one is also found in the PPI databases and a further one is present in the data to all three approaches. Finally, novel short linear interaction motifs are common to a number of proteins identified.     

Identification of Protein Interacting Partners Using Tandem Affinity Purification

A critical and often limiting step in understanding the function of host and viral proteins is the identification of interacting cellular or viral protein partners. There are many approaches that allow the identification of interacting partners, including the yeast two hybrid system, as well as pull down assays using recombinant proteins and immunoprecipitation of endogenous proteins followed by mass spectrometry identification¹. Recent studies have highlighted the utility of double-affinity tag mediated purification, coupled with two specific elution steps in the identification of interacting proteins. This approach, termed Tandem Affinity Purification (TAP), was initially used in yeast^2,3 but more recently has been adapted to use in mammalian cells^4-8.As proof-of-concept we have established a tandem affinity purification (TAP) method using the well-characterized eukaryotic translation initiation factor eIF4E^9,10.The cellular translation factor eIF4E is a critical component of the cellular eIF4F complex involved in cap-dependent translation initiation¹⁰. The TAP tag used in the current study is composed of two Protein G units and a streptavidin binding peptide separated by a Tobacco Etch Virus (TEV) protease cleavage sequence. The TAP tag used in the current study is composed of two Protein G units and a streptavidin binding peptide separated by a Tobacco Etch Virus (TEV) protease cleavage sequence⁸. To forgo the need for the generation of clonal cell lines, we developed a rapid system that relies on the expression of the TAP-tagged bait protein from an episomally maintained plasmid based on pMEP4 (Invitrogen). Expression of tagged murine eIF4E from this plasmid was controlled using the cadmium chloride inducible metallothionein promoter.Lysis of the expressing cells and subsequent affinity purification via binding to rabbit IgG agarose, TEV protease cleavage, binding to streptavidin linked agarose and subsequent biotin elution identified numerous proteins apparently specific to the eIF4E pull-down (when compared to control cell lines expressing the TAP tag alone). The identities of the proteins were obtained by excision of the bands from 1D SDS-PAGE and subsequent tandem mass spectrometry. The identified components included the known eIF4E binding proteins eIF4G and 4EBP-1. In addition, other components of the eIF4F complex, of which eIF4E is a component were identified, namely eIF4A and Poly-A binding protein. The ability to identify not only known direct binding partners as well as secondary interacting proteins, further highlights the utility of this approach in the characterization of proteins of unknown function.     

A biotin-based protein tagging system

Biotin protein ligase (BPL) mediates covalent attachment of biotin to a specific lysine residue of biotin carboxyl carrier protein (BCCP) of biotin-dependent enzymes. We recently found that the biotinylation reaction from thermophilic archaeon Sulfolobus tokodaii has a unique characteristic that the enzyme BPL forms a tight complex with the product, biotinylated BCCP (169 amino acid residues). In the current work, we attempted to apply this characteristic to a novel protein tagging system. Thus, the N terminus of S. tokodaii BCCP was truncated and the interaction of the resulting BCCP, BCCPΔ100 and BCCPΔ17 (with 69 and 152 residues, respectively), with BPL was investigated by surface plasmon resonance (SPR). It was found that the binding of BPL to the biotinylated BCCPΔ100 is extremely tight with a dissociation constant (K_D) of 1.2 nM, whereas that to the unbiotinylated counterpart was moderate with a K_D of 3.3 μM. Furthermore, chimeric proteins of glutathione S-transferase (GST) and green fluorescence protein (GFP) with BCCPΔ100 fused to their C terminus were prepared. The resulting fusion proteins were successfully biotinylated and captured on the BPL-modified SPR sensor chip or BPL-modified magnetic beads. The function of GST and GFP was hardly impaired on fusion with BCCPΔ100 and biotinylation of the latter.     

A versatile lentiviral expression system to identify mammalian protein-protein interactions

Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) are central to our understanding of protein function, biological processes and signaling pathways. Affinity purification coupled with mass spectrometry (AP-MS) is a powerful approach for detecting PPIs and protein complexes and relies on the purification of bait proteins using bait-specific binding reagents. These binding reagents may recognize bait proteins directly or affinity tags that are fused to bait proteins. A limitation of the latter approach is that expression of affinity tagged baits is largely constrained to engineered or unnatural cell lines, which results in the AP-MS identification of PPIs that may not accurately reflect those seen in nature. Therefore, generating cell lines stably expressing affinity tagged bait proteins in a broad range of cell types and cell lines is important for identifying PPIs that are dependent on different contexts. To facilitate the identification of PPIs across many mammalian cell types, we developed the mammalian affinity purification and lentiviral expression (MAPLE) system. MAPLE uses recombinant lentiviral technology to stably and efficiently express affinity tagged complementary DNA (cDNA) in mammalian cells, including cells that are difficult to transfect and non-dividing cells. The MAPLE vectors contain a versatile affinity (VA) tag for multi-step protein purification schemes and subcellular localization studies. In this methods article, we present a step-by-step overview of the MAPLE system workflow.     

In vivo analysis of proteomes and interactomes using Parallel Affinity Capture (iPAC) coupled to mass spectrometry

Affinity purification coupled to mass spectrometry provides a reliable method for identifying proteins and their binding partners. In this study we have used Drosophila melanogaster proteins triple tagged with Flag, Strep II, and Yellow fluorescent protein in vivo within affinity pull-down experiments and isolated these proteins in their native complexes from embryos. We describe a pipeline for determining interactomes by Parallel Affinity Capture (iPAC) and show its use by identifying partners of several protein baits with a range of sizes and subcellular locations. This purification protocol employs the different tags in parallel and involves detailed comparison of resulting mass spectrometry data sets, ensuring the interaction lists achieved are of high confidence. We show that this approach identifies known interactors of bait proteins as well as novel interaction partners by comparing data achieved with published interaction data sets. The high confidence in vivo protein data sets presented here add new data to the currently incomplete D. melanogaster interactome. Additionally we report contaminant proteins that are persistent with affinity purifications irrespective of the tagged bait.     

Highly efficient purification of protein complexes from mammalian cells using a novel streptavidin-binding peptide and hexahistidine tandem tag system: application to Bruton's tyrosine kinase

Tandem affinity purification (TAP) is a generic approach for the purification of protein complexes. The key advantage of TAP is the engineering of dual affinity tags that, when attached to the protein of interest, allow purification of the target protein along with its binding partners through two consecutive purification steps. The tandem tag used in the original method consists of two IgG‐binding units of protein A from Staphylococcus aureus (ProtA) and the calmodulin‐binding peptide (CBP), and it allows for recovery of 20–30% of the bait protein in yeast. When applied to higher eukaryotes, however, this classical TAP tag suffers from low yields. To improve protein recovery in systems other than yeast, we describe herein the development of a three‐tag system comprised of CBP, streptavidin‐binding peptide (SBP) and hexa‐histidine. We illustrate the application of this approach for the purification of human Bruton's tyrosine kinase (Btk), which results in highly efficient binding and elution of bait protein in both purification steps (>50% recovery). Combined with mass spectrometry for protein identification, this TAP strategy facilitated the first nonbiased analysis of Btk interacting proteins. The high efficiency of the SBP‐His₆ purification allows for efficient recovery of protein complexes formed with a target protein of interest from a small amount of starting material, enhancing the ability to detect low abundance and transient interactions in eukaryotic cell systems.     

Isotope-differentiated binding energy shift tags (IDBEST™) for improved targeted biomarker discovery and validation

Mass spectrometry has proved to be an important tool for protein biomarker discovery, identification and characterization. However, global proteomic profiling strategies often fail to identify known low-abundance biomarkers as a result of the limited dynamic range of mass spectrometry (two to three orders of magnitude) compared with the large dynamic range of protein concentrations in biologic fluids (11 to 12 orders of magnitude for serum). In addition, the number of peptides generated in such methods vastly overwhelms the resolution capacity of mass spectrometers, requiring extensive sample clean-up (e.g., affinity tag, retentate chromatography and/or high-performance liquid chromatography) before mass spectrometry analysis. Baiting and affinity pre-enrichment strategies, which overcome the dynamic range and sample complexity issues of global proteomic strategies, are very difficult to couple to mass spectrometry. This is due to the fact that it is nearly impossible to sort target peptides from those of the bait since there will be many cases of isobaric peptides. IDBEST? (Target Discovery, Inc.) is a new tagging strategy that enables such pre-enrichment of specific proteins or protein classes as the resulting tagged peptides are distinguishable from those of the bait by a mass defect shift of approximately 0.1 atomic mass units. The special characteristics of these tags allow: resolution of tagged peptides from untagged peptides through incorporation of a mass defect element; high-precision quantitation of up- and downregulation by using stable isotope versions of the same tag; and potential analysis of protein isoforms through more complete peptide coverage from the proteins of interest.