Roles of ERα during mouse trophectoderm lineage differentiation: revealed by antagonist and agonist of ERα

During mouse early embryogenesis, blastomeres increase in number by the morula stage. Among them, the outer cells are polarized and differentiated into trophectoderm (TE), while the inner cells remain unpolarized and give rise to inner cell mass (ICM). TE provides an important liquid environment for ICM development. In spite of extensive research, the molecular mechanisms underlying TE formation are still obscure. In order to investigate the roles of estrogen receptor α (ERα) in this course, mouse 8‐cell embryos were collected and cultured in media containing ERα specific antagonist MPP and/or agonist PPT. The results indicated that MPP treatment inhibits blastocyst formation in a dose‐dependent manner, while PPT, at proper concentration, promotes the cavitation ratio of mouse embryos. Immunofluorescence staining results showed that MPP significantly decreased the nuclear expression of CDX2 in morula, but no significant changes of OCT4 were observed. Moreover, after MPP treatment, the expression levels of the genes related to TE specification, Tead4, Gata3 and Cdx2, were significantly reduced. Overall, these results indicated that ERα might affect mouse embryo cavitation by regulating TE lineage differentiation.     

Trophoblast-specific DNA methylation occurs after the segregation of the trophectoderm and inner cell mass in the mouse periimplantation embryo

The first cell differentiation in the mammalian development separates the trophoblast and embryonic cell lineages, resulting in the formation of the trophectoderm (TE) and inner cell mass (ICM) in blastocysts. Although a lower level of global DNA methylation in the genome of the TE compared with ICM has been suggested, the dynamics of the DNA methylation profile during TE/ICM differentiation has not been elucidated. To address this issue, first we identified tissue-dependent and differentially methylated regions (T-DMRs) between trophoblast stem (TS) and embryonic stem (ES) cells. Most of these TS–ES T-DMRs were also methylated differentially between trophoblast and embryonic tissues of embryonic day (E) 6.5 mouse embryos. Furthermore, we found that the human genomic regions homologous to mouse TS–ES T-DMRs were methylated differentially between human placental tissues and ES cells. Collectively, we defined them as cell-lineage-based T-DMRs between trophoblast and embryonic cell lineages (T–E T-DMRs). Then, we examined TE and ICM cells isolated from mouse E3.5 blastocysts. Interestingly, all T-DMRs examined, including the Elf5, Pou5f1 and Nanog loci, were in the nearly unmethylated status in both TE and ICM and exhibited no differences. The present results suggest that the establishment of DNA methylation profiles specific to each cell lineage follows the first morphological specification. Together with previous reports on asymmetry of histone modifications between TE and ICM, the results of the current study imply that histone modifications function as landmarks for setting up cell-lineage-specific differential DNA methylation profiles.     

Allocation of cells to inner cell mass and trophectoderm lineages in preimplantation mouse embryos

Inner cell mass (ICM) and trophectoderm cell lineages in preimplantation mouse embryos were studied by means of iontophoretic injection of horseradish peroxidase (HRP) as a marker. HRP was injected into single blastomeres at the 2- and 8-cell stages and into single outer blastomeres at the 16-cell and late morula (about 22- to 32-cell) stages. After injection, embryos were either examined immediately for localization of HRP (controls) or they were allowed to develop until the blastocyst stage (1 to 3.5 days of culture) and examined for the distribution of labeled cells. In control embryos, HRP was confined to one or two outer blastomeres. In embryos allowed to develop into blastocysts, HRP-labeled progeny were distributed into patches of cells, showing that there is limited intermingling of cells during preimplantation development. A substantial fraction of injected blastomeres contributed descendants to both ICM and trophectoderm (95, 58, 44, and 35% for injected 2-cell, 8-cell, 16-cell, and late morula stages, respectively). Although more than half of the outer cells injected at 16-cell and late morula stages contributed descendants only to trophectoderm (53 and 63%, respectively), some outer cells contributed also to the ICM lineage even at the late morula stage. Although the mechanism for allocation of outer cells to the inner cell lineage is unknown, our observation of adjacent labeled mural trophectoderm and presumptive endoderm cells implicated polarized cell division. This observation also suggests that mural trophectoderm and presumptive endoderm are derived from common immediate progenitors. These cells appear to separate into inner and outer layers during the fifth cleavage division. Our results demonstrate the usefulness of HRP as a cell lineage marker in mouse embryos and show that the allocation of cells to ICM or trophectoderm begins after the 2-cell stage and continues into late cleavage.     

Individual blastomeres of 16- and 32-cell mouse embryos are able to develop into foetuses and mice

Cell and developmental studies have clarified how, by the time of implantation, the mouse embryo forms three primary cell lineages: epiblast (EPI), primitive endoderm (PE), and trophectoderm (TE). However, it still remains unknown when cells allocated to these three lineages become determined in their developmental fate. To address this question, we studied the developmental potential of single blastomeres derived from 16- and 32-cell stage embryos and supported by carrier, tetraploid blastomeres. We were able to generate singletons, identical twins, triplets, and quadruplets from individual inner and outer cells of 16-cell embryos and, sporadically, foetuses from single cells of 32-cell embryos. The use of embryos constitutively expressing GFP as the donors of single diploid blastomeres enabled us to identify their cell progeny in the constructed 2n↔4n blastocysts. We showed that the descendants of donor blastomeres were able to locate themselves in all three first cell lineages, i.e., epiblast, primitive endoderm, and trophectoderm. In addition, the application of Cdx2 and Gata4 markers for trophectoderm and primitive endoderm, respectively, showed that the expression of these two genes in the descendants of donor blastomeres was either down- or up-regulated, depending on the cell lineage they happened to occupy. Thus, our results demonstrate that up to the early blastocysts stage, the destiny of at least some blastomeres, although they have begun to express markers of different lineage, is still labile.     

Histone H3 Lysine 27 Methylation Asymmetry on Developmentally-Regulated Promoters Distinguish the First Two Lineages in Mouse Preimplantation Embryos

First lineage specification in the mammalian embryo leads to formation of the inner cell mass (ICM) and trophectoderm (TE), which respectively give rise to embryonic and extraembryonic tissues. We show here that this first differentiation event is accompanied by asymmetric distribution of trimethylated histone H3 lysine 27 (H3K27me3) on promoters of signaling and developmentally-regulated genes in the mouse ICM and TE. A genome-wide survey of promoter occupancy by H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 indicates that both compartments harbor promoters enriched in either modification, and promoters co-enriched in trimethylated H3K4 and H3K27 linked to developmental and signaling functions. The majority of H3K4/K27me3 co-enriched promoters are distinct between the two lineages, primarily due to differences in the distribution of H3K27me3. Derivation of embryonic stem cells leads to significant losses and gains of H3K4/K27me3 co-enriched promoters relative to the ICM, with distinct contributions of (de)methylation events on K4 and K27. Our results show histone trimethylation asymmetry on promoters in the first two developmental lineages, and highlight an epigenetic skewing associated with embryonic stem cell derivation.     

Cytokeratin filament assembly in the preimplantation mouse embryo

The timing, spatial distribution and control of cytokeratin assembly during mouse early development has been studied using a monoclonal antibody, TROMA-1, which recognizes a 55,000 Mr trophectodermal cytokeratin (ENDO A). This protein was first detected in immunoblots at the 4-cell stage, and became more abundant at the 16-cell stage and later. Immunofluorescence analysis revealed assembled cytokeratin filaments in some 8-cell blastomeres, but not at earlier stages. At the 16-cell stage, filaments were found in both polarized (presumptive trophectoderm; TE) and apolar (presumptive inner cell mass; ICM) cells in similar proportions, although polarized cells possessed more filaments than apolar cells. By the late 32-cell, early blastocyst, stage, all polarized (TE) cells contained extensive filament networks whereas cells positioned inside the embryo tended to have lost their filaments. The presence of filaments in inside cells at the 16-cell stage and in ICM cells was confirmed by immunoelectron microscopy. Lineage tracing techniques demonstrated that those cells in the ICM of early blastocysts which did possess filaments were almost exclusively the progeny of polar 16-cell blastomeres, suggesting that these filaments were directly inherited from outside cells at the 16- to 32-cell transition. Inhibitor studies revealed that proximate protein synthesis but not mRNA synthesis is required for filament assembly at the 8-cell stage. These results demonstrate that there are quantitative rather than qualitative differences in the expression of cytokeratin filaments in the inner cell mass and trophectoderm cells of the mouse embryo.     

CDX2 in the formation of the trophectoderm lineage in primate embryos

The first lineage decision during mammalian development is the establishment of the trophectoderm (TE) and the inner cell mass (ICM). The caudal-type homeodomain protein Cdx2 is implicated in the formation and maintenance of the TE in the mouse. However, the role of CDX2 during early embryonic development in primates is unknown. Here, we demonstrated that CDX2 mRNA levels were detectable in rhesus monkey oocytes, significantly upregulated in pronuclear stage zygotes, diminished in early cleaving embryos but restored again in compact morula and blastocyst stages. CDX2 protein was localized to the nucleus of TE cells but absent altogether in the ICM. Knockdown of CDX2 in monkey oocytes resulted in formation of early blastocyst-like embryos that failed to expand and ceased development. However, the ICM lineage of CDX2-deficient embryos supported the isolation of functional embryonic stem cells. These results provide evidence that CDX2 plays an essential role in functional TE formation during primate embryonic development.     

Asynchronous CDX2 expression and polarization of porcine trophoblast cells reflects a species‐specific trophoderm lineage determination progress model

Upregulation of Cdx2 expression in outer cells is a key event responsible for cell lineage segregation between the inner cell mass and the trophoderm (TE) in mouse morula‐stage embryos. In TE cells, polarization can regulate Hippo and Rho‐associated kinase (Rho‐ROCK) signaling to induce the nuclear location of YAP, which has been demonstrated to further induce the expression of Cdx2. However, we found that CDX2 expression could not be detected in the outer cells of porcine morula‐stage embryos but only in some TE cells at the early blastocyst stage. The biological significance and the regulation mechanism of this species‐specific CDX2 expression pattern have still not been determined. We show here that an asynchronous CDX2 expression pattern exists in porcine TE cells during the development of the blastocyst. We demonstrate that CDX2 expression in porcine TE cells depends on the nuclear localization of YAP and polarization of the embryo through Y27632 treatment. We found that the polarization process in the morula to the late blastocyst stage porcine embryos was asynchronous, which was revealed by the apical localization of phosphorylated EZRIN staining. Artificially enhancing the number of polarized blastomeres by culturing the separated blastomeres of four‐cell stage porcine embryos resulted in increased CDX2‐positive cell numbers. These results indicate that the mechanism of CDX2 expression regulation is conserved, but the polarization progress is not conserved between the pig and the mouse, and results in a species‐specific trophoblast determination progress model.     

Influence of early fate decisions at the two-cell stage on the derivation of mouse embryonic stem cell lines

The first event of differentiation in mammalian embryogenesis is the segregation of the inner cell mass and trophectoderm lineages in the blastocyst. Cellular and molecular events related to this process are still a controversial issue. During the years it was thought that first allocation of blastomeres before the blastocyst stage was done in the late eight-cell stage with the formation of inner and outer cells. Lately, many studies have pointed out that individual blastomeres at the four-cell stage differ in their developmental properties according to their position within the embryo. In this report, we wanted to elucidate whether these early decisions influence the production of mouse embryonic stem cell lines, so that a selective isolation of blastomeres at the four-cell stage to derive the lines could improve the efficiency of the derivation process. Results from blastomere tracking experiments support the idea of a different developmental potential of blastomeres within the four-cell stage embryo. However, we also show a high plasticity in the developmental pattern of blastomeres once isolated from the embryo, thus making all four-cell stage blastomeres equally competent to derive ESC lines.     

Establishing three blastocyst lineages--then what?

Development of the mouse embryo to the blastocyst stage occurs over 3 to 4 days following fertilization of the oocyte. During this time, several molecular and morphological events take place that result in the formation of three distinct cell lineages: the trophectoderm, the epiblast, and the primitive endoderm. Many studies have investigated the processes that control lineage specification in the blastocyst including gene expression, cell signaling, cell-cell contact/positional relationships, and most recently, epigenetics. Here we review, at the molecular level, recent contributions to our understanding of the mechanisms that play a role in formation of these lineages. Additionally, we focus on the next steps in differentiation to highlight processes important in the development of those lineages that contribute to the extraembryonic tissues. In this context, we discuss the establishment of extraembryonic ectoderm and the contributions of parietal and visceral endoderm to yolk sac formation.