Molecular dynamics of the full-length p53 monomer

The p53 protein is frequently mutated in a very large proportion of human tumors, where it seems to acquire gain-of-function activity that facilitates tumor onset and progression. A possible mechanism is the ability of mutant p53 proteins to physically interact with other proteins, including members of the same family, namely p63 and p73, inactivating their function. Assuming that this interaction might occurs at the level of the monomer, to investigate the molecular basis for this interaction, here, we sample the structural flexibility of the wild-type p53 monomeric protein. The results show a strong stability up to 850 ns in the DNA binding domain, with major flexibility in the N-terminal transactivations domains (TAD1 and TAD2) as well as in the C-terminal region (tetramerization domain). Several stable hydrogen bonds have been detected between N-terminal or C-terminal and DNA binding domain, and also between N-terminal and C-terminal. Essential dynamics analysis highlights strongly correlated movements involving TAD1 and the proline-rich region in the N-terminal domain, the tetramerization region in the C-terminal domain; Lys120 in the DNA binding region. The herein presented model is a starting point for further investigation of the whole protein tetramer as well as of its mutants.     

Evaluation of p63 and p73 antibodies for cross-reactivity

The tumor suppressor p53 is commonly mutated in human cancers. However, two homologs of p53, p63 and p73, are frequently over-expressed in tumors and are associated with tumor subtypes, clinical outcomes, and responses to therapy. There are many isoforms of p53, p63, and p73 (the p53 family). Proper detection of and discrimination between the members of this tumor suppressor family in human tissues is of critical importance to cancer research and clinical care. In this study, we assessed the specificity of several commercially available and newly generated p73 antibodies, focusing on antibodies that distinguish between the TAp73 and ?Np73 isoforms by Western analysis, immunohistochemistry, and immunofluorescence. In addition, we found that the pan-p63 and pan-p73 antibodies tested cross-react with p73 and p63 respectively. The results of this study have important implications for analysis of p63 and p73 expression and co-expression in human tumors, and for potential use of these reagents in molecular diagnostics and therapeutic decision-making.     

Neurodevelopment on route p63

All known members of the p53 gene family, including the two homologs p73 and p63, have multiple biological functions. In neurons, p53 and p73 are known to regulate cell death in the developing and adult nervous system. A report by Jacobs et al. in this issue of Neuron shows that the more ancestral member of this gene family, p63, is an essential proapoptotic protein during neuronal development.     

Role of the newer p53 family proteins in malignancy

The most recently identified members of the p53 family, p63 and p73, share certain structural and functional similarities with p53. Both p63 and p73 can bind to canonical p53-DNA-binding sites, transactivate the promoters of known p53 target genes and induce apoptosis. Despite these similarities there are many important differences. In contrast to p53, p63 and p73 give rise to multiple distinct protein isoforms that have different functional properties. Upstream signaling pathways involved in the activation of p63 and p73 differ from those involved in p53 activation. Only a subset of the DNA damaging agents that induce p53 can induce p73. Cellular and viral oncoproteins can discriminate between p53 and the newer family members. In addition, the levels of p63 and p73 are affected by certain states of cellular differentiation. Finally, it is becoming clear that the newest members of the p53 family are not classical tumor suppressor genes. In contrast to the high prevalence of p53 mutations in human cancers, p63 and p73 mutations are rare. Indeed, levels of p73 increase during malignant progression. In addition, unlike p53-/- mice, mice lacking p63 and p73 do not develop tumors, but instead have significant developmental abnormalities. Mutations in p63 have also been detected in humans with the ectodermal dysplastic syndrome EEC. Further studies are required to determine whether qualitative or quantitative differences in the expression of p63 and p73 isoforms are important in the development of human cancers.     

Roles for p53 and p73 during oligodendrocyte development

Oligodendrocytes make myelin in the vertebrate central nervous system (CNS). They develop from oligodendrocyte precursor cells (OPCs), most of which divide a limited number of times before they stop and differentiate. OPCs can be purified from the developing rat optic nerve and stimulated to proliferate in serum-free culture by PDGF. They can be induced to differentiate in vitro by either thyroid hormone (TH) or PDGF withdrawal. It was shown previously that a dominant-negative form of p53 could inhibit OPC differentiation induced by TH but not by PDGF withdrawal, suggesting that the p53 family of proteins might play a part in TH-induced differentiation. As the dominant-negative p53 used inhibited all three known p53 family members - p53, p63 and p73 - it was uncertain which family members are important for this process. Here, we provide evidence that both p53 and p73, but not p63, are involved in TH-induced OPC differentiation and that p73 also plays a crucial part in PDGF-withdrawal-induced differentiation. This is the first evidence for a role of p73 in the differentiation of a normal mammalian cell.     

p73 and p63: Why Do We Still Need Them?

When p73 and p63 were initially described as homologues of the tumor suppressor p53, the three family members seemed almost exchangeable, raising the question why all three were retained during evolution. It later turned out that the corresponding genes, TP63 and TP73, appear phylogenetically older than TP53, and that their targeted deletion causes severe developmental defects, in contrast to a deletion of TP53. Hence, p63 and p73 are responsible for biological effects that cannot be elicited by p53 alone. Here, we provide an overview of properties ascribed to p63 and p73 that distinguish them from p53. Differences occur at the following levels: i) protein structure, especially with regard to the aminoterminal transactivation domains and the carboxyterminal portions unique to p63 and p73; ii) regulation, affecting mRNA levels, posttranslational modifications and interaction with other cellular proteins; iii) activities, resulting in the regulation of gene expression, the programming of development, and the emergence of tumors. We speculate that, during the course of evolution, p63 and p73 have first pursued a broader range of activities, whereas p53 later specialized on genome maintenance.     

The p53 and Mdm2 families in cancer.

Cells within an organism are occasionally exposed to either intracellular or environmental stress. Such stress often has genotoxic potential that enhances the probability of cancer. Two gene families, the p53 family (p53, p63 and p73) and the Mdm2 family (Mdm2 and MdmX), serve as major integrators of the signals generated by genotoxic and oncogenic stress. Their co-ordinated modulation ensures an optimal response to stress and decreases the likelihood of cancer. Work over the past year has provided better understanding of the p53-Mdm2 module that lies in the heart of this regulatory network, and of the intricate interplay between the various members of the network.     

TAp63 plays compensatory roles in p53-deficient cancer cells under genotoxic stress

p53, p63, and p73 belong to the p53 family of proteins, which mediate development, differentiation, and various other cellular responses. p53 is involved in many anti-cancer mechanisms, such as cell cycle regulation, apoptosis, and the maintenance of genomic integrity. The p63 gene is controlled by two promoters that direct the expression of two isoforms, one with and one without transactivating properties, known as TAp63 and ΔNp63. In this study, p53-deficient cells (Hep3B and PC-3) and p53-expressing cells (A549 and HepG2) were treated with doxorubicin to examine the possible roles of TAp63 in these cells under genotoxic stress; TAp63 expression was induced in p53-deficient cell lines, but not in p53-expressing cell lines. The ectopic expression of p53 in p53-deficient cells (Hep3B) reduced TAp63 promoter activity, and knockdown of TAp63 attenuated doxorubicin-induced cell growth arrest by promoting cell cycle progression, leading to an increase in the percentage of G(2)/M cells. Moreover, knockdown of TAp63 increased cell sensitivity to doxorubicin-induced genomic damage. Our results suggest that TAp63 may play a compensatory role in cell cycle regulation and DNA damage repair in p53-deficient cancer cells.     

Li-Fraumeni Syndrome: a p53 Family Affair

The p53 alterations frequently found in human tumors are missense mutations in the DNA binding domain. These p53 mutations have been shown to have gain-of-function or dominant negative properties in multiple experiments. The consequences of these p53 mutations at physiological levels on the development of a tumor were unclear. Using mouse models, three recent papers have shed light on the mechanisms of mutant p53 and its family members, p63 and p73, in tumorigenesis. Interestingly, the p53 point mutant mice had a similar phenotype to p53 family compound mutant mice suggesting that there is an interplay between the p53 family members in tumorigenesis and Li-Fraumeni syndrome.