Thermodynamic characterization of the interaction of mutant UvrB protein with damaged DNA

During the DNA damage recognition of nucleotide excision repair in Escherichia coli the interaction of UvrB protein with damaged DNA ensures the recognition of differences in the intrinsic chemical structures of a variety of adduct molecules in DNA double helix. Our earlier study indicated that a single tyrosine-to-tryptophan mutation at residue 95 converted the UvrB to a protein [UvrB(Y95W)] that is able to bind to a structure-specific bubble DNA substrate, even in the absence of UvrA. Fluorescence spectroscopy therefore was adopted to investigate the biochemical properties and thermodynamics of DNA damage recognition by the mutant protein. We examined the binding of the UvrB(Y95W) mutant protein to a structure-specific 30 bp DNA substrate containing a single fluorescein which serves as both an adduct and a fluorophore. Binding of the protein to the substrate results in a significant reduction in fluorescence. By monitoring the fluorescence changes, binding isotherms were generated from a series of titration experiments at various physiological temperatures, and dissociation constants were determined. Analysis of our data indicate that interaction of UvrB(Y95W) protein with the adduct incurred a large negative change in heat capacity DeltaC(p)(o)(obs) (-1.1 kcal mol(-1) K(-1)), while the DeltaG(o)(obs) was relatively unchanged with temperature. Further study of the binding at various concentrations of KCl showed that on average only about 1.5 ion pairs were involved in formation of the UvrB-DNA complex. Together, these results suggested that hydrophobic interactions are the main driving forces for the recognition of DNA damage by UvrB protein.     

Robust incision of Benoz[a]pyrene-7,8-dihyrodiol-9,10-epoxide-DNA adducts by a recombinant thermoresistant interspecies combination UvrABC endonuclease system

Prokaryotic DNA repair nucleases are useful reagents for detecting DNA lesions. UvrABC endonuclease, encoded by the UvrA, UvrB, and UvrC genes can incise DNA containing bulky nucleotide adducts and intrastrand cross-links. UvrA, UvrB, and UvrC were cloned from Bacillus caldotenax (Bca)and UvrC from Thermatoga maritima (Tma), and recombinant proteins were overexpressed in and purified from Escherichia coli. Incision activities of UvrABC composed of all Bca-derived subunits (UvrABC(Bca)) and an interspecies combination UvrABC composed of Bca-derived UvrA and UvrB and Tma-derived UvrC (UvrABC(Tma)) were compared on benoz[a]pyrene-7,8-dihyrodiol-9,10-epoxide (BPDE)-adducted substrates. Both UvrABC(Bca) and UvrABC(Tma) specifically incised both BPDE-adducted plasmid DNAs and site-specifically modified 50-bp oligonucleotides containing a single (+)-trans- or (+)-cis-BPDE adduct. Incision activity was maximal at 55-60 degrees C. However, UvrABC(Tma) was more robust than UvrABC(Bca) with 4-fold greater incision activity on BPDE-adducted oligonucleotides and 1.5-fold greater on [(3)H]BPDE-adducted plasmid DNAs. Remarkably, UvrABC(Bca) incised only at the eighth phosphodiester bond 5' to the BPDE-modified guanosine. In contrast, UvrABC(Tma) performed dual incision, cutting at both the fifth phosphodiester bond 3' and eighth phosphodiester bond 5' from BPDE-modified guanosine. BPDE adduct stereochemistry influenced incision activity, and cis adducts on oligonucleotide substrates were incised more efficiently than trans adducts by both UvrABC(Bca) and UvrABC(Tma). UvrAB-DNA complex formation was similar with (+)-trans- and (+)-cis-BPDE-adducted substrates, suggesting that UvrAB binds both adducts equally and that adduct configuration modifies UvrC recognition of the UvrAB-DNA complex. The dual incision capabilities and higher incision activity of UvrABC(Tma) make it a robust tool for DNA adduct studies.     

Reduced sulfhydryls maintain specific incision of BPDE-DNA adducts by recombinant thermoresistant Bacillus caldotenax UvrABC endonuclease

Prokaryotic DNA repair nucleases are useful reagents for detecting DNA lesions. Escherichia coli UvrABC endonuclease can incise DNA containing UV photoproducts and bulky chemical adducts. The limited stability of the E. coli UvrABC subunits leads to difficulty in estimating incision efficiency and quantitative adduct detection. To develop a more stable enzyme with greater utility for the detection of DNA adducts, thermoresistant UvrABC endonuclease was cloned from the eubacterium Bacillus caldotenax (Bca) and individual recombinant protein subunits were overexpressed in and purified from E. coli. Here, we show that Bca UvrC that had lost activity or specificity could be restored by dialysis against buffer containing 500 mM KCl and 20mM dithiothreitol. Our data indicate that UvrC solubility depended on high salt concentrations and UvrC nuclease activity and the specificity of incisions depended on the presence of reduced sulfhydryls. Optimal conditions for BCA UvrABC-specific cleavage of plasmid DNAs treated with [3H](+)-7R,8S-dihydroxy-9S,10R-epoxy-7,8,9,10-tetrahydrobenzo[a]pyrene (BPDE) (1-5 lesions/plasmid) were developed. Preincubation of substrates with UvrA and UvrB enhanced incision efficiency on damaged substrates and decreased non-specific nuclease activity on undamaged substrates. Under optimal conditions for damaged plasmid incision, approximately 70% of adducts were incised in 1 nM plasmid DNA (2 BPDE adducts/5.4 kbp plasmid) with UvrA at 2.5 nM, UvrB at 62.5 nM, and UvrC at 25 nM. These results demonstrate the potential usefulness of the Bca UvrABC for monitoring the distribution of chemical carcinogen-induced lesions in DNA.     

Differential incision of bulky carcinogen-DNA adducts by the UvrABC nuclease: comparison of incision rates and the interactions of Uvr subunits with lesions of different structures

The UvrABC nuclease system from Escherichia coli removes DNA damages induced by a wide range of chemical carcinogens with variable efficiencies. The interactions with UvrABC proteins of the following three lesions site-specifically positioned in DNA, and of known conformations, were investigated: (i) adducts derived from the binding of the (-)-(7S,8R,9R,10S) enantiomer of 7,8-dihydroxy-9, 10-epoxy-7,8,9,10-tetrahydrobenzo[a]pyrene [(-)-anti-BPDE] by cis-covalent addition to N(2)-2'-deoxyguanosine [(-)-cis-anti-BP-N(2)-dG], (ii) an adduct derived from the binding of the (+)-(1R,2S,3S,4R) enantiomer of 1,2-dihydroxy-3,4-epoxy-1,2,3, 4-tetrahydro-5-methylchrysene [(+)-anti-5-MeCDE] by trans addition to N(2)-2'-deoxyguanosine [(+)-trans-anti-MC-N(2)-dG], and (iii) a C8-2'-deoxyguanosine adduct (C8-AP-dG) formed by reductively activated 1-nitropyrene (1-NP). The influence of these three different adducts on UvrA binding affinities, formation of UvrB-DNA complexes by quantitative gel mobility shift analyses, and the rates of UvrABC incision were investigated. The binding affinities of UvrA varied among the three adducts. UvrA bound to the DNA adduct (+)-trans-anti-MC-N(2)-dG with the highest affinity (K(d) = 17 +/- 2 nM) and to the DNA containing C8-AP-dG with the least affinity (K(d) = 28 +/- 1 nM). The extent of complex formation with UvrB was also the lowest with the C8-AP-dG adduct. 5' Incisions occurred at the eighth phosphate from the modified guanine. The major 3' incision site corresponded to the fifth phosphodiester bond for all three adducts. However, additional 3' incisions were observed at the fourth and sixth phosphates in the case of the C8-AP-dG adduct, whereas in the case of the (-)-cis-anti-BP-N(2)-dG and (+)-trans-anti-MC-N(2)-dG lesions additional 3' cleavage occurred at the sixth and seventh phosphodiester bonds. Both the initial rate and the extent of 5' and 3' incisions revealed that C8-AP-dG was repaired less efficiently in comparison to the (-)-cis-anti-BP-N(2)-dG and (+)-trans-anti-MC-N(2)-dG containing DNA adducts. Our study showed that UvrA recognizes conformational changes induced by structurally different lesions and that in certain cases the binding affinities of UvrA and UvrB can be correlated with the incision rates. The size of the bubble formed around the damaged site with mismatched bases also appears to influence the incision rates. A particularly noteworthy finding in this study is that UvrABC repair of a substrate with no base opposite C8-AP-dG was quite inefficient as compared to the same adduct with a C opposite it. These findings are discussed in terms of the available NMR solution structures.     

Structural insights into the cryptic DNA-dependent ATPase activity of UvrB

The UvrABC pathway is a ubiquitously occurring mechanism targeted towards the repair of bulky base damage. Key to this process is UvrB, a DNA-dependent limited helicase that acts as a lesion recognition element whilst part of a tracking complex involving UvrA, and as a DNA-binding platform required for the presentation of damage to UvrC for subsequent processing. We have been able to determine the structure of a ternary complex involving UvrB* (a C-terminal truncation of full-length UvrB), a polythymine trinucleotide and ADP. This structure has highlighted the roles of key conserved residues in DNA binding distinct from those of the beta-hairpin, where most of the attention in previous studies has been focussed. We are also the first to report the structural basis underlying conformational re-modelling of the beta-hairpin that is absolutely required for DNA binding and how this event results in an ATPase primed for catalysis. Our data provide the first insights at the molecular level into the transformation of UvrB into an active helicase.     

Clue to damage recognition by UvrB: residues in the beta-hairpin structure prevent binding to non-damaged DNA.

UvrB, the ultimate damage-recognizing component of bacterial nucleotide excision repair, contains a flexible beta-hairpin rich in hydrophobic residues. We describe the properties of UvrB mutants in which these residues have been mutated. The results show that Y101 and F108 in the tip of the hairpin are important for the strand-separating activity of UvrB, supporting the model that the beta-hairpin inserts between the two DNA strands during the search for DNA damage. Residues Y95 and Y96 at the base of the hairpin have a direct role in damage recognition and are positioned close to the damage in the UvrB-DNA complex. Strikingly, substituting Y92 and Y93 results in a protein that is lethal to the cell. The mutant protein forms pre- incision complexes on non-damaged DNA, indicating that Y92 and Y93 function in damage recognition by preventing UvrB binding to non-damaged sites. We propose a model for damage recognition by UvrB in which, stabilized by the four tyrosines at the base of the hairpin, the damaged nucleotide is flipped out of the DNA helix.     

Binding of the UvrB dimer to non-damaged and damaged DNA: residues Y92 and Y93 influence the stability of both subunits

UvrB is the ultimate damage-binding protein in bacterial nucleotide excision repair. Previous AFM experiments have indicated that UvrB binds to a damage as a dimer. In this paper we visualize for the first time a UvrB dimer in a gel retardation assay, with the second subunit (B2) more loosely bound than the subunit (B1) that interacts with the damage. A beta-hairpin motif in UvrB plays an important role in damage specific binding. Alanine substitutions of Y92 or Y93 in the beta-hairpin result in proteins that kill E. coli cells as a consequence of incision in non-damaged DNA. Apparently, both residues are needed to prevent binding of UvrB to non-damaged DNA. The lethality of Y93A results from UvrC-mediated incisions, whereas that of Y92A is due to incisions by Cho. This difference could be ascribed to a difference in stability of the B2 subunit in the mutant UvrB-DNA complexes. We show that for 3' incision UvrC needs to displace this second UvrB subunit from the complex, whereas Cho seems capable to incise the dimer-complex. Footprint analysis of the contacts of UvrB with damaged DNA revealed that the B2 subunit interacts with the flanking DNA at the 3' side of the lesion. The B2 subunit of mutant Y92A appeared to be more firmly associated with the DNA, indicating that even when B1 is bound to a lesion, the B2 subunit probes the adjacent DNA for presence of damage. We propose this to be a reflection of the process that the UvrB dimer uses to find lesions in the DNA. In addition to preventing binding to non-damaged DNA, the Y92 and Y93 residues appear also important for making specific contacts (of B1) with the damaged site. We show that the concerted action of the two tyrosines lead to a conformational change in the DNA surrounding the lesion, which is required for the 3' incision reaction.     

Effects of DNA adduct structure and sequence context on strand opening of repair intermediates and incision by UvrABC nuclease

DNA damage recognition of nucleotide excision repair (NER) in Escherichia coli is achieved by at least two steps. In the first step, a helical distortion is recognized, which leads to a strand opening at the lesion site. The second step involves the recognition of the type of chemical modification in the single-stranded region of DNA during the processing of the lesions by UvrABC. In the current work, by comparing the efficiencies of UvrABC incision of several types of different DNA adducts, we show that the size and position of the strand opening are dependent on the type of DNA adducts. Optimal incision efficiency for the C8-guanine adducts of 2-aminofluorene (AF) and N-acetyl-2-aminofluorene (AAF) was observed in a bubble of three mismatched nucleotides, whereas the same for C8-guanine adduct of 1-nitropyrene and N(2)-guanine adducts of benzo[a]pyrene diol epoxide (BPDE) was noted in a bubble of six mismatched nucleotides. This suggests that the size of the aromatic ring system of the adduct might influence the extent and number of bases associated with the opened strand region catalyzed by UvrABC. We also showed that the incision efficiency of the AF or AAF adduct was affected by the neighboring DNA sequence context, which, in turn, was the result of differential binding of UvrA to the substrates. The sequence context effect on both incision and binding disappeared when a bubble structure of three bases was introduced at the adduct site. We therefore propose that these effects relate to the initial step of damage recognition of DNA structural distortion. The structure-function relationships in the recognition of the DNA lesions, based on our results, have been discussed.     

The beta -hairpin motif of UvrB is essential for DNA binding, damage processing, and UvrC-mediated incisions.

UvrB plays a major role in recognition and processing of DNA lesions during nucleotide excision repair. The crystal structure of UvrB revealed a similar fold as found in monomeric DNA helicases. Homology modeling suggested that the beta-hairpin motif of UvrB might be involved in DNA binding (Theis, K., Chen, P. J., Skorvaga, M., Van Houten, B., and Kisker, C. (1999) EMBO J. 18, 6899-6907). To determine a role of the beta-hairpin of Bacillus caldotenax UvrB, we have constructed a deletion mutant, Deltabetah UvrB, which lacks residues Gln-97-Asp-112 of the beta-hairpin. Deltabetah UvrB does not form a stable UvrB-DNA pre-incision complex and is inactive in UvrABC-mediated incision. However, Deltabetah UvrB is able to bind to UvrA and form a complex with UvrA and damaged DNA, competing with wild type UvrB. In addition, Deltabetah UvrB shows wild type-like ATPase activity in complex with UvrA that is stimulated by damaged DNA. In contrast to wild type UvrB, the ATPase activity of mutant UvrB does not lead to a destabilization of the damaged duplex. These results indicate that the conserved beta-hairpin motif is a major factor in DNA binding.     

Interactions between UvrA and UvrB: the role of UvrB's domain 2 in nucleotide excision repair

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is a highly conserved DNA repair mechanism present in all kingdoms of life. UvrB is a central component of the bacterial NER system, participating in damage recognition, strand excision and repair synthesis. None of the three presently available crystal structures of UvrB has defined the structure of domain 2, which is critical for the interaction with UvrA. We have solved the crystal structure of the UvrB Y96A variant, which reveals a new fold for domain 2 and identifies highly conserved residues located on its surface. These residues are restricted to the face of UvrB important for DNA binding and may be critical for the interaction of UvrB with UvrA. We have mutated these residues to study their role in the incision reaction, formation of the pre-incision complex, destabilization of short duplex regions in DNA, binding to UvrA and ATP hydrolysis. Based on the structural and biochemical data, we conclude that domain 2 is required for a productive UvrA-UvrB interaction, which is a pre-requisite for all subsequent steps in nucleotide excision repair.     

The presence of two UvrB subunits in the UvrAB complex ensures damage detection in both DNA strands

It is generally accepted that the damage recognition complex of nucleotide excision repair in Escherichia coli consists of two UvrA and one UvrB molecule, and that in the preincision complex UvrB binds to the damage as a monomer. Using scanning force microscopy, we show here that the damage recognition complex consists of two UvrA and two UvrB subunits, with the DNA wrapped around one of the UvrB monomers. Upon binding the damage and release of the UvrA subunits, UvrB remains a dimer in the preincision complex. After association with the UvrC protein, one of the UvrB monomers is released. We propose a model in which the presence of two UvrB subunits ensures damage recognition in both DNA strands. Upon binding of the UvrA(2)B(2) complex to a putative damaged site, the DNA wraps around one of the UvrB monomers, which will subsequently probe one of the DNA strands for the presence of a lesion. When no damage is found, the DNA will wrap around the second UvrB subunit, which will check the other strand for aberrations.     

Analysis of UvrABC endonuclease reaction intermediates on cisplatin-damaged DNA using mobility shift gel electrophoresis.

One of the least understood steps in the UvrABC mediated excision repair process is the recognition of lesions in the DNA. The isolation of different reaction intermediates is of vital importance for the unraveling of the mechanism. A mobility shift gel electrophoresis assay is described which visualizes such intermediates. After incubation of a DNA substrate containing a specific cisplatin adduct with UvrA alone or with UvrA and UvrB, UvrA.DNA, UvrAB.DNA and UvrB.DNA complexes were observed which could be identified using specific antibodies. At low UvrA concentrations in the presence of UvrB only the UvrB.DNA complex is observed. Bands corresponding to the UvrAB.DNA complex and also other nonspecific bands are found at relatively high UvrA concentrations. The DNase-I footprint for the UvrAB.- and UvrB.DNA complex are very similar and protect about 20 bases. Both complexes are incised in the presence of UvrC with comparable efficiency. The UvrAB.- and the UvrB.DNA complex were both incised at the 8th phosphodiester bond 5' to a specific cisplatin adduct. In addition the UvrAB.DNA complex could also be incised at the 15th phosphodiesterbond 5' to the damaged site. The results suggest that the UvrB.DNA complex is the natural substrate for UvrC-induced incision.     

Crystal structure of the UvrB dimer: insights into the nature and functioning of the UvrAB damage engagement and UvrB-DNA complexes

UvrB has a central role in the highly conserved UvrABC pathway functioning not only as a damage recognition element but also as an essential component of the lesion tracking machinery. While it has been recently confirmed that the tracking assembly comprises a UvrA(2)B(2) heterotetramer, the configurations of the damage engagement and UvrB-DNA handover complexes remain obscure. Here, we present the first crystal structure of a UvrB dimer whose biological significance has been verified using both chemical cross-linking and electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy. We demonstrate that this dimeric species stably associates with UvrA and forms a UvrA(2)B(2)-DNA complex. Our studies also illustrate how signals are transduced between the ATP and DNA binding sites to generate the helicase activity pivotal to handover and formation of the UvrB(2)-DNA complex, providing key insights into the configurations of these important repair intermediates.     

Sequence-dependent interactions of two forms of UvrC with DNA helix-stabilizing CC-1065-N3-adenine adducts

The uvrA, uvrB, and uvrC genes of Escherichia coli control the initial steps of nucleotide excision repair. The uvrC gene product is involved in at least one of the dual incisions produced by the UvrABC complex. Using single-stranded (ss) DNA affinity chromatography, we have separated two forms of UvrC from both wild-type E. coli cells and overproducing cells. UvrCI elutes at 0.4 M KCl, and UvrCII elutes at 0.6 M KCl. In general, both forms, in the presence of UvrA and UvrB, actively incise UV-irradiated and CC-1065-modified DNA in the same fashion; i.e., they incise six to eight nucleotides 5' to and three to five nucleotides 3' to a photoproduct or a CC-1065-N3-adenine adduct. They produce different incisions, however, at a CC-1065-N3-adenine adduct in the sequence 5'-GATTACG- present in the MspI-BstNI 117 bp fragment of M13mp1. UvrABCI incises at both the 5' and 3' sides of the adduct (UvrABCI cut), while UvrABCII incises only at the 5' side (UvrABCII cut). Mixing UvrCI and UvrCII results in both UvrABCI and UvrABCII cuts, and the levels of these two types of cutting are proportional to the amount of UvrCI and UvrCII. DNase I footprints of the MspI-BstNI 117 bp DNA fragment containing a site-directed CC-1065-adenine adduct at the 5'-GATTACG- site show that UvrCII, but not UvrCI, binds to the adduct site. Furthermore, the pattern of DNase I footprints induced by UvrCII binding differs from the pattern of the footprints induced by UvrA, UvrAB, and UvrABCI binding. Interestingly, while the presence of unirradiated DNA enhances the efficiency of UvrABCII in incising UV-irradiated DNA, it does not enhance UvrABCII incision of the CC-1065-N3-adenine adduct formed at 5'-GATTACG-. These results show that two different forms of UvrC differ in DNA binding properties as well as incision modes at some kinds of DNA damage.     

Strand opening by the UvrA(2)B complex allows dynamic recognition of DNA damage.

Repair proteins alter the local DNA structure during nucleotide excision repair (NER). However, the precise role of DNA melting remains unknown. A series of DNA substrates containing a unique site-specific BPDE-guanine adduct in a region of non-complementary bases were examined for incision by the Escherichia coli UvrBC endonuclease in the presence or absence of UvrA. UvrBC formed a pre-incision intermediate with a DNA substrate containing a 6-base bubble structure with 2 unpaired bases 5' and 3 unpaired bases 3' to the adduct. Formation of this bubble served as a dynamic recognition step in damage processing. UvrB or UvrBC may form one of three stable repair intermediates with DNA substrates, depending upon the state of the DNA surrounding the modified base. The dual incisions were strongly determined by the distance between the adduct and the double-stranded-single-stranded DNA junction of the bubble, and required homologous double-stranded DNA at both incision sites. Remarkably, in the absence of UvrA, UvrBC nuclease can make both 3' and 5' incisions on substrates with bubbles of 3-6 nucleotides, and an uncoupled 5' incision on bubbles of >/=>/=10 nucleotides. These data support the hypothesis that the E.coli and human NER systems recognize and process DNA damage in a highly conserved manner.     

The C-terminal zinc finger of UvrA does not bind DNA directly but regulates damage-specific DNA binding

In prokaryotic nucleotide excision repair, UvrA recognizes DNA perturbations and recruits UvrB for the recognition and processing steps in the reaction. One of the most remarkable aspects of UvrA is that it can recognize a wide range of DNA lesions that differ in chemistry and structure. However, how UvrA interacts with DNA is unknown. To examine the role that the UvrA C-terminal zinc finger domain plays in DNA binding, an eleven amino acid deletion was constructed (ZnG UvrA). Biochemical characterization of the ZnG UvrA protein was carried out using UvrABC DNA incision, DNA binding and ATPase assays. Although ZnG UvrA was able to bind dsDNA slightly better than wild-type UvrA, the ZnG UvrA mutant only supported 50-75% of wild type incision. Surprisingly, the ZnG UvrA mutant, while retaining its ability to bind dsDNA, did not support damage-specific binding. Furthermore, this mutant protein only provided 10% of wild-type Bca UvrA complementation for UV survival of an uvrA deletion strain. In addition, ZnG UvrA failed to stimulate the UvrB DNA damage-associated ATPase activity. Electrophoretic mobility shift analysis was used to monitor UvrB loading onto damaged DNA with wild-type UvrA or ZnG UvrA. The ZnG UvrA protein showed a 30-60% reduction in UvrB loading as compared with the amount of UvrB loaded by wild-type UvrA. These data demonstrate that the C-terminal zinc finger of UvrA is required for regulation of damage-specific DNA binding.     

Architecture of nucleotide excision repair complexes: DNA is wrapped by UvrB before and after damage recognition

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is a major DNA repair mechanism that recognizes a broad range of DNA damages. In Escherichia coli, damage recognition in NER is accomplished by the UvrA and UvrB proteins. We have analysed the structural properties of the different protein-DNA complexes formed by UvrA, UvrB and (damaged) DNA using atomic force microscopy. Analysis of the UvrA(2)B complex in search of damage revealed the DNA to be wrapped around the UvrB protein, comprising a region of about seven helical turns. In the UvrB-DNA pre-incision complex the DNA is wrapped in a similar way and this DNA configuration is dependent on ATP binding. Based on these results, a role for DNA wrapping in damage recognition is proposed. Evidence is presented that DNA wrapping in the pre-incision complex also stimulates the rate of incision by UvrC.     

Hierarchy of DNA damage recognition in Escherichia coli nucleotide excision repair

DNA damage recognition plays a central role in nucleotide excision repair (NER). Here we present evidence that in Escherichia coli NER, DNA damage is recognized through at least two separate but successive steps, with the first focused on distortions from the normal structure of the DNA double helix (initial recognition) and the second specifically recognizing the type of DNA base modifications (second recognition), after an initial local separation of the DNA strands. DNA substrates containing stereoisomeric (+)- or (-)-trans- or (+)- or (-)-cis-BPDE-N(2)-dG lesions in DNA duplexes of known conformations were incised by UvrABC nuclease with efficiencies varying by up to 3-fold. However, these stereoisomeric adducts, when positioned in an opened, single-stranded DNA region, were all incised with similar efficiencies and with enhanced rates (by factors of 1.4-6). These bubble substrates were also equally and efficiently incised by UvrBC nuclease without UvrA. Furthermore, removal of the Watson-Crick partner cytosine residue (leaving an abasic site) in the complementary strand opposite a (+)-cis-BPDE-N(2)-dG lesion led to a significant reduction in both the binding of UvrA and the incision efficiency of UvrABC by a factor of 5. These data suggest that E. coli NER features a dynamic two-stage recognition mechanism.     

Repair of mitomycin C mono- and interstrand cross-linked DNA adducts by UvrABC: a new model

Mitomycin C induces both MC-mono-dG and cross-linked dG-adducts in vivo. Interstrand cross-linked (ICL) dG-MC-dG-DNA adducts can prevent strand separation. In Escherichia coli cells, UvrABC repairs ICL lesions that cause DNA bending. The mechanisms and consequences of NER of ICL dG-MC-dG lesions that do not induce DNA bending remain unclear. Using DNA fragments containing a MC-mono-dG or an ICL dG-MC-dG adduct, we found (i) UvrABC incises only at the strand containing MC-mono-dG adducts; (ii) UvrABC makes three types of incisions on an ICL dG-MC-dG adduct: type 1, a single 5′ incision on 1 strand and a 3′ incision on the other; type 2, dual incisions on 1 strand and a single incision on the other; and type 3, dual incisions on both strands; and (iii) the cutting kinetics of type 3 is significantly faster than type 1 and type 2, and all of 3 types of cutting result in producing DSB. We found that UvrA, UvrA + UvrB and UvrA + UvrB + UvrC bind to MC-modified DNA specifically, and we did not detect any UvrB- and UvrB + UvrC–DNA complexes. Our findings challenge the current UvrABC incision model. We propose that DSBs resulted from NER of ICL dG-MC-dG adducts contribute to MC antitumor activity and mutations.     

Analyzing the handoff of DNA from UvrA to UvrB utilizing DNA-protein photoaffinity labeling

To better define the molecular architecture of nucleotide excision repair intermediates it is necessary to identify the specific domains of UvrA, UvrB, and UvrC that are in close proximity to DNA damage during the repair process. One key step of nucleotide excision repair that is poorly understood is the transfer of damaged DNA from UvrA to UvrB, prior to incision by UvrC. To study this transfer, we have utilized two types of arylazido-modified photoaffinity reagents that probe residues in the Uvr proteins that are closest to either the damaged or non-damaged strands. The damaged strand probes consisted of dNTP analogs linked to a terminal arylazido moiety. These analogs were incorporated into double-stranded DNA using DNA polymerase beta and functioned as both the damage site and the cross-linking reagent. The non-damaged strand probe contained an arylazido moiety coupled to a phosphorothioate-modified backbone of an oligonucleotide opposite the damaged strand, which contained an internal fluorescein adduct. Six site-directed mutants of Bacillus caldotenax UvrB located in different domains within the protein (Y96A, E99A, R123A, R183E, F249A, and D510A), and two domain deletions (Delta2 and Deltabeta-hairpin), were assayed. Data gleaned from these mutants suggest that the handoff of damaged DNA from UvrA to UvrB proceeds in a three-step process: 1) UvrA and UvrB bind to the damaged site, with UvrA in direct contact; 2) a transfer reaction with UvrB contacting mostly the non-damaged DNA strand; 3) lesion engagement by the damage recognition pocket of UvrB with concomitant release of UvrA.