Differential effectiveness of microbially induced resistance against herbivorous insects in Arabidopsis

Rhizobacteria-induced systemic resistance (ISR) and pathogen-induced systemic acquired resistance (SAR) have a broad, yet partly distinct, range of effectiveness against pathogenic microorganisms. Here, we investigated the effectiveness of ISR and SAR in Arabidopsis against the tissue-chewing insects Pieris rapae and Spodoptera exigua. Resistance against insects consists of direct defense, such as the production of toxins and feeding deterrents and indirect defense such as the production of plant volatiles that attract carnivorous enemies of the herbivores. Wind-tunnel experiments revealed that ISR and SAR did not affect herbivore-induced attraction of the parasitic wasp Cotesia rubecula (indirect defense). By contrast, ISR and SAR significantly reduced growth and development of the generalist herbivore S. exigua, although not that of the specialist P. rapae. This enhanced direct defense against S. exigua was associated with potentiated expression of the defense-related genes PDF1.2 and HEL. Expression profiling using a dedicated cDNA microarray revealed four additional, differentially primed genes in microbially induced S. exigua-challenged plants, three of which encode a lipid-transfer protein. Together, these results indicate that microbially induced plants are differentially primed for enhanced insect-responsive gene expression that is associated with increased direct defense against the generalist S. exigua but not against the specialist P. rapae.     

The plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium Bacillus cereus AR156 induces systemic resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana by simultaneously activating salicylate- and jasmonate/ethylene-dependent signaling pathways

Bacillus cereus AR156 is a plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium that induces resistance against a broad spectrum of pathogens including Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000. This study analyzed AR156-induced systemic resistance (ISR) to DC3000 in Arabidopsis ecotype Col-0 plants. Compared with mock-treated plants, AR156-treated ones showed an increase in biomass and reductions in disease severity and pathogen density in the leaves. The defense-related genes PR1, PR2, PR5, and PDF1.2 were concurrently expressed in the leaves of AR156-treated plants, suggesting simultaneous activation of the salicylic acid (SA)- and the jasmonic acid (JA)- and ethylene (ET)-dependent signaling pathways by AR156. The above gene expression was faster and stronger in plants treated with AR156 and inoculated with DC3000 than that in plants only inoculated with DC3000. Moreover, the cellular defense responses hydrogen peroxide accumulation and callose deposition were induced upon challenge inoculation in the leaves of Col-0 plants primed by AR156. Also, pretreatment with AR156 led to a higher level of induced protection against DC3000 in Col-0 than that in the transgenic NahG, the mutant jar1 or etr1, but the protection was absent in the mutant npr1. Therefore, AR156 triggers ISR in Arabidopsis by simultaneously activating the SA- and JA/ET-signaling pathways in an NPR1-dependent manner that leads to an additive effect on the level of induced protection.     

Systemic resistance in Arabidopsis induced by rhizobacteria requires ethylene-dependent signaling at the site of application.

Root colonization of Arabidopsis thaliana by the nonpathogenic, rhizosphere-colonizing, biocontrol bacterium Pseudomonas fluorescens WCS417r has been shown to elicit induced systemic resistance (ISR) against Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Pst). The ISR response differs from the pathogen-inducible systemic acquired resistance (SAR) response in that ISR is independent of salicylic acid and not associated with pathogenesis-related proteins. Several ethylene-response mutants were tested and showed essentially normal symptoms of Pst infection. ISR was abolished in the ethylene-insensitive mutant etr1-1, whereas SAR was unaffected. Similar results were obtained with the ethylene-insensitive mutants ein2 through ein7, indicating that the expression of ISR requires the complete signal-transduction pathway of ethylene known so far. The induction of ISR by WCS417r was not accompanied by increased ethylene production in roots or leaves, nor by increases in the expression of the genes encoding the ethylene biosynthetic enzymes 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic (ACC) synthase and ACC oxidase. The eir1 mutant, displaying ethylene insensitivity in the roots only, did not express ISR upon application of WCS417r to the roots, but did exhibit ISR when the inducing bacteria were infiltrated into the leaves. These results demonstrate that, for the induction of ISR, ethylene responsiveness is required at the site of application of inducing rhizobacteria.     

Host and non-host pathogens elicit different jasmonate/ethylene responses in Arabidopsis

Arabidopsis does not support the growth and asexual reproduction of the barley pathogen, Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei Bgh). A majority of germlings fail to penetrate the epidermal cell wall and papillae. To gain additional insight into this interaction, we determined whether the salicylic acid (SA) or jasmonate (JA)/ethylene (ET) defence pathways played a role in blocking barley powdery mildew infections. Only the eds1 mutant and NahG transgenics supported a modest increase in penetration success by the barley powdery mildew. We also compared the global gene expression patterns of Arabidopsis inoculated with the non-host barley powdery mildew to those inoculated with a virulent, host powdery mildew, Erysiphe cichoracearum. Genes repressed by inoculations with non-host and host powdery mildews relative to non-inoculated control plants accounted for two-thirds of the differentially expressed genes. A majority of these genes encoded components of photosynthesis and general metabolism. Consistent with this observation, Arabidopsis growth was inhibited following inoculation with Bgh, suggesting a shift in resource allocation from growth to defence. A number of defence-associated genes were induced during both interactions. These genes likely are components of basal defence responses, which do not effectively block host powdery mildew infections. In addition, genes encoding defensins, anti-microbial peptides whose expression is under the control of the JA/ET signalling pathway, were induced exclusively by non-host pathogens. Ectopic activation of JA/ET signalling protected Arabidopsis against two biotrophic host pathogens. Taken together, these data suggest that biotrophic host pathogens must either suppress or fail to elicit the JA/ET signal transduction pathway.     

Heterotrimeric G proteins facilitate Arabidopsis resistance to necrotrophic pathogens and are involved in jasmonate signaling

Heterotrimeric G proteins have been previously linked to plant defense; however a role for the Gbetagamma dimer in defense signaling has not been described to date. Using available Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) mutants lacking functional Galpha or Gbeta subunits, we show that defense against the necrotrophic pathogens Alternaria brassicicola and Fusarium oxysporum is impaired in Gbeta-deficient mutants while Galpha-deficient mutants show slightly increased resistance compared to wild-type Columbia ecotype plants. In contrast, responses to virulent (DC3000) and avirulent (JL1065) strains of Pseudomonas syringae appear to be independent of heterotrimeric G proteins. The induction of a number of defense-related genes in Gbeta-deficient mutants were severely reduced in response to A. brassicicola infection. In addition, Gbeta-deficient mutants exhibit decreased sensitivity to a number of methyl jasmonate-induced responses such as induction of the plant defensin gene PDF1.2, inhibition of root elongation, seed germination, and growth of plants in sublethal concentrations of methyl jasmonate. In all cases, the behavior of the Galpha-deficient mutants is coherent with the classic heterotrimeric mechanism of action, indicating that jasmonic acid signaling is influenced by the Gbetagamma functional subunit but not by Galpha. We hypothesize that Gbetagamma acts as a direct or indirect enhancer of the jasmonate signaling pathway in plants.     

茉莉酸及其甲酯在植物诱导抗病性中的作用

茉莉酸类物质被认为是植物抗病防卫反应的内源及中间信号分子。本文介绍了茉莉酸及其甲酯在植物抗病性中的作用,从它们在体内激活的代谢途径及相关基因表达探讨有关作用机制以及有可能在农业上应用的前景。     

Biologically induced systemic acquired resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana

Local infection with a necrotizing pathogen can render plants resistant to subsequent infection by normally virulent pathogens. A system for biological induction of such systemic acquired resistance (SAR) in Arabidopsis thaliana is reported. When plants were immunized by local inoculation of a single leaf with avirulent Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Pst) carrying the avrRpt2 avirulence gene, after 2 days other leaves became resistant, as measured symptomatically and by in planta bacterial growth, to challenge with a virulent Pst strain lacking this avirulence gene. Resistance was systemic and protected the plants against infection by other virulent pathogens including P. syringae pv. maculicola. Low-dose inoculation induced a strong SAR and double immunizations did not increase the level of protection indicating that the response of only a few cells to the immunizing bacteria is required. SAR was not induced by the virulent strain of Pst lacking avrRpt2. However, experiments with the Arabidopsis RPS2 disease resistance gene mutant rps2-201, which does not exhibit a local hypersensitive response to Pst carrying the corresponding avirulence gene avrRpt2, indicate that a hypersensitive response contributes to, but is not essential for, the induction of SAR. Thus, avrRpt2 activates either a branching signal pathway or separate parallel pathways for induction of localized hypersensitive resistance and SAR, with downstream potentiation of the systemic response by the local response. Using this system for the biological induction of SAR in Arabidopsis, it should be possible to dissect the molecular genetics of SAR by the isolation of mutants affected in the production, transmission, perception and transduction of the systemic signal(s).     

外源茉莉酸和茉莉酸甲酯诱导植物抗虫作用及其机理

综述了茉莉酸(jasmonic acid, JA)和茉莉酸甲酯(methyl jasmo nate, MJA)的分子结构和应用其诱导的植物抗虫作用及其机制。植物受外源茉莉酸或茉莉酸甲酯刺激后,一条反应途径是由硬脂酸途径激活防御基因,另一条途径是直接激活防御基因。防御基因激活后导致代谢途径重新配置,并可能诱导植物产生下列4种效应：（1）直接防御,即植物产生对害虫有毒的物质、抗营养和抗消化的酶类,或具驱避性和妨碍行为作用的化合物;（2）间接防御,即产生吸引天敌的挥发物;（3）不防御,即无防御反应;（4）负防御,即产生吸引害虫的挥发物。     

Haemoglobin modulates salicylate and jasmonate/ethylene-mediated resistance mechanisms against pathogens

Nitric oxide (NO) plays a role in defence against hemibiotrophic pathogens mediated by salicylate (SA) and also necrotrophic pathogens influenced by jasmonate/ethylene (JA/Et). This study examined how NO-oxidizing haemoglobins (Hb) encoded by GLB1, GLB2, and GLB3 in Arabidopsis could influence both defence pathways. The impact of Hb on responses to the hemibiotrophic Pseudomonas syringae pathovar tomato (Pst) AvrRpm1 and the necrotrophic Botrytis cinerea were investigated using glb1, glb2, and glb3 mutant lines and also CaMV 35S GLB1 and GLB2 overexpression lines. In glb1, but not glb2 and glb3, increased resistance was observed to both pathogens but was compromised in the 35S-GLB1. A quantum cascade laser-based sensor measured elevated NO production in glb1 infected with Pst AvrRpm1 and B. cinerea, which was reduced in 35S-GLB1 compared to Col-0. SA accumulation was increased in glb1 and reduced in 35S-GLB1 compared to controls following attack by Pst AvrRpm1. Similarly, JA and Et levels were increased in glb1 but decreased in 35S-GLB1 in response to attack by B. cinerea. Quantitative PCR assays indicated reduced GLB1 expression during challenge with either pathogen, thus this may elevate NO concentration and promote a wide-ranging defence against pathogens.     

Oxo-phytodienoic acid-containing galactolipids in Arabidopsis: jasmonate signaling dependence

The jasmonate family of phytohormones, as represented by 12-oxo-phytodienoic acid (OPDA), dinor-phytodienoic acid (dn-OPDA), and jasmonic acid in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), has been implicated in a vast array of different developmental processes and stress responses. Recent reports indicate that OPDA and dn-OPDA occur not only as free acids in Arabidopsis, but also as esters with complex lipids, so-called arabidopsides. Recently, we showed that recognition of the two bacterial effector proteins AvrRpm1 and AvrRpt2 induced high levels of a molecule consisting of two OPDAs and one dn-OPDA esterified to a monogalactosyl diacylglycerol moiety, named arabidopside E. In this study, we demonstrate that the synthesis of arabidopsides is mainly independent of the prokaryotic lipid biosynthesis pathway in the chloroplast, and, in addition to what previously has been reported, arabidopside E as well as an all-OPDA analog, arabidopside G, described here accumulated during the hypersensitive response and in response to wounding. We also show that different signaling pathways lead to the formation of arabidopsides during the hypersensitive response and the wounding response, respectively. However, the formation of arabidopsides during both responses is dependent on an intact jasmonate signaling pathway. Additionally, we report inhibition of growth of the fungal necrotrophic pathogen Botrytis cinerea and in planta release of free jasmonates in a time frame that overlaps with the observed reduction of arabidopside levels. Thus, arabidopsides may have a dual function: as antipathogenic substances and as storage compounds that allow the slow release of free jasmonates.     

The Arabidopsis mutant cev1 has constitutively active jasmonate and ethylene signal pathways and enhanced resistance to pathogens

Jasmonates (JAs) inhibit plant growth and induce plant defense responses. To define genes in the Arabidopsis JA signal pathway, we screened for mutants with constitutive expression of a luciferase reporter for the JA-responsive promoter from the vegetative storage protein gene VSP1. One mutant, named constitutive expression of VSP1 (cev1), produced plants that were smaller than wild type, had stunted roots with long root hairs, accumulated anthocyanin, had constitutive expression of the defense-related genes VSP1, VSP2, Thi2.1, PDF1.2, and CHI-B, and had enhanced resistance to powdery mildew diseases. Genetic evidence indicated that the cev1 phenotype required both COI1, an essential component of the JA signal pathway, and ETR1, which encodes the ethylene receptor. We conclude that cev1 stimulates both the JA and the ethylene signal pathways and that CEV1 regulates an early step in an Arabidopsis defense pathway.     

Brassinosteroid negatively regulates jasmonate inhibition of root growth in Arabidopsis

Jasmonate (JA) inhibits root growth of Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings. The mutation in COI1, that plays a central role in JA signaling, displays insensitivity to JA inhibition of root growth. To dissect JA signaling pathway, we recently isolated one mutant named psc1, which partially suppresses coi1 insensitivity to JA inhibition of root growth. As we identified the PSC1 gene as an allele of DWF4 that encodes a key enzyme in brassinosteroid (BR) biosynthesis, we hypothesized and demonstrated that BR is involved in JA signaling and negatively regulates JA inhibition of root growth. In our Plant Physiology paper, we analyzed effects of psc1 or exogenous BR on the inhibition of root growth by JA. Here we show that treatment with brassinazole (Brz), a BR biosynthesis inhibitor, increased JA sensitivity in both coi1-2 and wild type, which further confirms that BR negatively regulates JA inhibition of root growth. Since effects of psc1, Brz and exogenous BR on JA inhibition of root growth were mild, we suggests that BR negatively finely regulates JA inhibition of root growth in Arabidopsis.Key words: jasmonate signaling, root growth, brassinosteroid, brassinazole, arabidopsisJasmonate (JA) regulates many plant developmental processes and stress responses.^1,2 COI1 plays a central role in JA signaling and is required for all JA responses in Arabidopsis.^3,4 coi1-1, a strong mutation in COI1, is male sterile and exhibits loss of all JA responses tested to date, such as JA inhibition of root growth, the expression of JA-induced genes, and susceptibility to insect attack and pathogen infection, and coi1-2, a weak mutant of COI1, shows similar JA responses to coi1-1 except for partially fertile that makes it able to produce a small quantity of seeds.⁵To investigate COI1-mediated JA responses and dissect JA signaling pathway, we conducted genetic screens for suppressors of coi1-2. Previously, we identified cos1 that completely suppresses coil-2 insensitive to JA.⁶ Recently, we isolated the psc1 mutant that partially suppresses coi1-2 insensitivity to JA, and found that PSC1 is an allele of DWF4.⁷Since the DWF4 gene encodes a key enzyme in brassinosteroid (BR) biosynthesis,⁸ we hypothesized that BR is involved in JA signaling. By physiological analysis, we showed that psc1 partially restored JA inhibition of root growth in coi1-2 background and displayed JA hypersensitivity in wild-type COI1 background, the effects of psc1 were eliminated by exogenous BR, and that exogenous BR could attenuated JA inhibition of root growth in wild type. These findings demonstrated that BR is involved in JA signaling and indicated that BR negatively regulates JA inhibition of root growth.BR is a family of polyhydroxylated steroid hormones involved in many aspects of plant growth and development. The BR-deficient mutants exhibited severely retarded growth that was able to be rescued by exogenous BR.⁹ Brassinazole (Brz) is a BR biosynthesis inhibitor. The Arabidopsis seedlings treated with Brz displayed a BR deficient-mutant-like phenotype, which could be elimilated by exogenous BR.¹⁰To determine wether treatment with Brz affects JA inhibition of root growth, the seedlings of wild type and coi1-2 were grown in MS medium supplemented with MeJA and/or Brz. As shown in Figure 1, the relative root length was obviously reduced in both coi1-2 and wild type when treated with Brz relative to without Brz, indicating that the repression of BR biosynthesis by Brz could increase JA sensitivity. These results further confirm BR negatively regulates JA inhibition of root growth.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Effect of Brz on JA inhibition of root growth. Brz increased JA inhibition of root growth in both coi1-2 and wild type (WT). Root length of 7-day-old seedlings grown in MS medium containing 0, 5 and 10 μM MeJA without (−) or with (+) 0.5 μM Brz was expressed as a percentage of root length in MS without (−) or with (+) 0.5 µM Brz. Error bars represent SE (n > 30).It has been demonstrated that JA connects with other plant hormones including auxin, ethylene, abscisic acid, salicylic acid and gibberellin to form complex regulatory networks modulating plant developmental and stress responses.^11–15 We found that BR negatively regulates JA inhibition of root growth, suggesting that a cross talk between JA and BR exists in planta, which extends our understandings on the JA signal transduction.COI1 is a JA receptor¹⁶ and DWF4 catalyzes the rate-limiting step in BR-biosynthesis pathway.⁸ We found that JA inhibits DWF4 expression, this inhibition was dependent on COI1,⁷ indicating that DWF4 is downregulated by JA and is located downstream of COI1 in the JA signaling pathway.Since the effects of psc1, Brz, and exogenous BR on JA inhibition of root growth were mild, and the DWF4 expression was partially repressed by JA (Ren et al. 2009, Fig. 1), we suggest that BR negatively finely regulates JA inhibition of root growth, and propose a model for these regulations. As shown in Figure 2A, JA signal passes COI1 repressing substrates, such as JAZs,^17,18 i.e., JA activates degradation of substrates via SCF^COI1-26S proteasome,^16–18 whereas substrates positively regulate root growth through other regulators. JA also partially inhibits DWF4 expression through COI1, reducing BR that is required for root growth.^7,9 Mutation in COI1 interrupts JA signaling for failing in degradation of substrates and repression of DWF4 as well, resulting in JA-insensitivity (Fig. 2B). However, mutation in DWF4 or treatment with Brz causes a reduction in BR, which affects root growth, leading to JA-hypersensitivity in wild-type COI1 background (Fig. 2C and E) and partial restoration of JA sensitivity in coi1-2 background (Fig. 2D and F). Whereas, an application of exogenous BR could eliminate the effect of BR reduction resulted from repression of DWF4 by JA on root growth, attenuating JA sensitivity in wild type (Fig. 2G). Because the inhibition of DWF4 expression by JA is dependent on COI1, the coi1 mutant treated with exogenous BR do not show alteration in JA sensitivity (Fig. 2H).Open in a separate windowFigure 2A model for that BR negatively finely regulates JA inhibition of root growth in Arabidopsis. (A–D) Treatment with JA in wild type (A), coi1-2 (B), psc1 (C) and psc1coi1 (D). (E and F) Treatments with JA and Brz in wild type (E) and coi1-2 (F). (G and H) Treatments with JA and exogenous BR in wild type (G) and coi1-2 (H). Arrows indicate positive regulation or enhancement, whereas blunted lines indicate repression or negative regulation. Crosses indicate interruption or impairment. The letter “S” indicates substrates of SCF^COI1. Thicker arrows and blunted lines represent the central JA signaling pathway regulating JA inhibition of root growth. Broken arrows represent JA signaling pathway in which other regulators are involved. The intensity of gray boxes represents the degree of JA inhibition on root growth.     

Proteomics of Arabidopsis redox proteins in response to methyl jasmonate

Protein redox regulation is increasingly recognized as an important switch of protein activity in yeast, bacteria, mammals and plants. In this study, we identified proteins with potential thiol switches involved in jasmonate signaling, which is essential for plant defense. Methyl jasmonate (MeJA) treatment led to enhanced production of hydrogen peroxide in Arabidopsis leaves and roots, indicating in vivo oxidative stress. With monobromobimane (mBBr) labeling to capture oxidized sulfhydryl groups and 2D gel separation, a total of 35 protein spots that displayed significant redox and/or total protein expression changes were isolated. Using LC–MS/MS, the proteins in 33 spots were identified in both control and MeJA-treated samples. By comparative analysis of mBBr and SyproRuby gel images, we were able to determine many proteins that were redox responsive and proteins that displayed abundance changes in response to MeJA. Interestingly, stress and defense proteins constitute a large group that responded to MeJA. In addition, many cysteine residues involved in the disulfide dynamics were mapped based on tandem MS data. Identification of redox proteins and their cysteine residues involved in the redox regulation allows for a deeper understanding of the jasmonate signaling networks.     

Genetic architecture of plastic methyl jasmonate responses in Arabidopsis thaliana

The ability of a single genotype to generate different phenotypes in disparate environments is termed phenotypic plasticity, which reflects the interaction of genotype and environment on developmental processes. However, there is controversy over the definition of plasticity genes. The gene regulation model states that plasticity loci influence trait changes between environments without altering the means within a given environment. Alternatively, the allelic sensitivity model argues that plasticity evolves due to selection of phenotypic values expressed within particular environments; hence plasticity must be controlled by loci expressed within these environments. To identify genetic loci controlling phenotypic plasticity and address this controversy, we analyzed the plasticity of glucosinolate accumulation under methyl jasmonate (MeJa) treatment in Arabidopsis thaliana. We found genetic variation influencing multiple MeJa signal transduction pathways. Analysis of MeJa responses in the Landsberg erecta x Columbia recombinant inbred lines identified a number of quantitative trait loci (QTL) that regulate plastic MeJa responses. All significant plasticity QTL also impacted the mean trait value in at least one of the two "control" or "MeJa" environments, supporting the allelic sensitivity model. Additionally, we present an analysis of MeJa and salicylic acid cross-talk in glucosinolate regulation and describe the implications for glucosinolate physiology and functional understanding of Arabidopsis MeJa signal transduction.