Centrosome misorientation mediates slowing of the cell cycle under limited nutrient conditions in Drosophila male germline stem cells

Drosophila male germline stem cells (GSCs) divide asymmetrically, balancing self-renewal and differentiation. Although asymmetric stem cell division balances between self-renewal and differentiation, it does not dictate how frequently differentiating cells must be produced. In male GSCs, asymmetric GSC division is achieved by stereotyped positioning of the centrosome with respect to the stem cell niche. Recently we showed that the centrosome orientation checkpoint monitors the correct centrosome orientation to ensure an asymmetric outcome of the GSC division. When GSC centrosomes are not correctly oriented with respect to the niche, GSC cell cycle is arrested/delayed until the correct centrosome orientation is reacquired. Here we show that induction of centrosome misorientation upon culture in poor nutrient conditions mediates slowing of GSC cell proliferation via activation of the centrosome orientation checkpoint. Consistently, inactivation of the centrosome orientation checkpoint leads to lack of cell cycle slowdown even under poor nutrient conditions. We propose that centrosome misorientation serves as a mediator that transduces nutrient information into stem cell proliferation, providing a previously unappreciated mechanism of stem cell regulation in response to nutrient conditions.     

p53-Driven apoptosis limits centrosome amplification and genomic instability downstream of NPM1 phosphorylation

Chromosome loss or gain is associated with a large number of solid cancers, providing genomic plasticity and thus adaptability to cancer cells. Numerical centrosome abnormalities arising from centrosome over-duplication or failed cytokinesis are a recognized cause of aneuploidy. In higher eukaryotic cells, the centrosome duplicates only once per cell cycle to ensure the formation of a bipolar mitotic spindle that orchestrates the balanced distribution of the sister chromatids to the respective daughter cells. Here we delineate the events that allow abnormal centrosome duplication, resulting in mitotic errors and incorrect chromosome segregation in cells with sustained cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) activity. We have identified NPM1 as a substrate for CDK6 activated by the Kaposi's sarcoma herpesvirus (KSHV) D-type cyclin and shown that p53-driven apoptosis occurs downstream of NPM1 phosphorylation as a checkpoint mechanism that prevents accumulation of cells with supernumerary centrosomes. Our findings provide evidence that abnormal chromosome segregation in KSHV-infected cells is a direct consequence of NPM1 phosphorylation and predict that genomic instability is an inevitable consequence of latent KSHV infection.     

Structure meets function--centrosomes, genome maintenance and the DNA damage response

Centrosomes are cytoplasmic organelles playing a fundamental role in organizing both the interphase cytoskeleton and the bipolar mitotic spindle. In addition, the centrosome has recently come into focus as part of the network that integrates cell cycle arrest and repair signals in response to genotoxic stress--the DNA damage response. One important mediator of this response, the checkpoint kinase Chk1, has been shown to negatively regulate the G(2)/M transition via its centrosomal localization. Moreover, there is growing evidence that a centrosome inactivation checkpoint exists, which utilizes DNA damage-induced centrosome fragmentation or amplification to provoke a "mitotic catastrophe" and eliminate damaged cells. Candidate regulators of this centrosomal checkpoint include the checkpoint kinase Chk2 and its upstream regulators ATM and ATR. In addition, a growing number of other proteins have been implicated in centrosomal regulation of the DNA damage response, e.g. the tumor suppressor p53, the breast cancer susceptibility gene product BRCA1 and mitotic regulators such as Aurora A, Nek2 and the Polo-like kinases Plk1 and Plk3. However, many missing links and discrepancies between different model systems remain.     

Regulating mammalian checkpoints through Cdc25 inactivation

Precise monitoring of DNA replication and chromosome segregation ensures that there is accurate transmission of genetic information from a cell to its daughters. Eukaryotic cells have developed a complex network of checkpoint pathways that sense DNA lesions and defects in chromosome segregation, spindle assembly and the centrosome cycle, leading to an inhibition of cell-cycle progression for the time required to remove the defect and thus preventing genomic instability. The activation of checkpoints that are responsive to DNA damage or incomplete DNA replication ultimately results in the inhibition of cyclin-dependent kinases. This review focuses on our understanding of the biochemical mechanisms that specifically inactivate Cdc25 (cell division cycle 25) phosphatases to achieve this. The evidence for links between checkpoint deregulation and oncogenesis is discussed.     

Loading and Unloading: Orchestrating Centrosome Duplication and Spindle Assembly by Ran/Crm1

The cell cycle is an intricate process of DNA replication and cell division thatconcludes with the formation of two genetically equivalent daughter cells. In thisprogression, the centrosome is duplicated once and only once during the G1/S transitionto produce the bipolar spindle and ensure proper chromosome segregation. The presenceof multiple centrosomes in cancer cells suggests that this process is mis-regulated duringcarcinogenesis. This suggests that certain factors exist that license the progression ofcentrosome duplication and serve to inhibit further duplications during a single cell cycle.Recent studies suggest that the Ran/Crm1 complex not only regulates nucleocytoplasmictransport but is also independently involved in mitotic spindle assembly. Factors that arecapable of interacting with Ran/Crm1 through their nuclear export sequences, such ascyclins/cdks, p53 and Brca1/2, may potentially function as centrosome checkpoints akinto the G1/S and G2/M checkpoints of the cell cycle. Our recent findings indicate thatnucleophosmin, a protein whose trafficking is mediated by the Ran/Crm1 network, is oneof such checkpoint factors for maintaining proper centrosome duplication. We proposethat Ran/Crm1 may act as a ‘loading dock’ to coordinate various checkpoint factors inregulating the fidelity of centrosome duplication during cell cycle progression, and thedisruption of these processes may lead to genomic instability and an acceleration ofoncogenesis.     

Multiple assembly mechanisms anchor the KMN spindle checkpoint platform at human mitotic kinetochores

During mitosis, the spindle checkpoint senses kinetochores not properly attached to spindle microtubules and prevents precocious sister-chromatid separation and aneuploidy. The constitutive centromere-associated network (CCAN) at inner kinetochores anchors the KMN network consisting of Knl1, the Mis12 complex (Mis12C), and the Ndc80 complex (Ndc80C) at outer kinetochores. KMN is a critical kinetochore receptor for both microtubules and checkpoint proteins. Here, we show that nearly complete inactivation of KMN in human cells through multiple strategies produced strong checkpoint defects even when all kinetochores lacked microtubule attachment. These KMN-inactivating strategies reveal multiple KMN assembly mechanisms at human mitotic kinetochores. In one mechanism, the centromeric kinase Aurora B phosphorylates Mis12C and strengthens its binding to the CCAN subunit CENP-C. In another, CENP-T contributes to KMN attachment in a CENP-H-I-K–dependent manner. Our study provides insights into the mechanisms of mitosis-specific assembly of the checkpoint platform KMN at human kinetochores.     

Aurora kinases link chromosome segregation and cell division to cancer susceptibility

Aurora kinases play critical roles in chromosome segregation and cell division. They are implicated in the centrosome cycle, spindle assembly, chromosome condensation, microtubule-kinetochore attachment, the spindle checkpoint and cytokinesis. Aurora kinases are regulated through phosphorylation, the binding of specific partners and ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis. Several Aurora substrates have been identified and their roles are being elucidated. The deregulation of Aurora kinases impairs spindle assembly, checkpoint function and cell division, causing missegregation of individual chromosomes or polyploidization accompanied by centrosome amplification. Aurora kinases are frequently overexpressed in cancers and the identification of Aurora A as a cancer-susceptibility gene provides a strong link between mitotic errors and carcinogenesis.     

ECRG2 disruption leads to centrosome amplification and spindle checkpoint defects contributing chromosome instability

Cancer cells contain an abnormal number of chromosomes (aneuploidy), which is a prevalent form of genetic instability in human cancers. Abnormal amplification of centrosomes and defects of spindle assembly checkpoint are the major causes of chromosome instability in cancer cells. Here we present biochemical evidence to suggest a role of ECRG2, a novel tumor suppressor gene, in maintaining chromosome stability. ECRG2 localized to centrosomes during interphase and kinetochores during mitosis. Further analysis revealed that ECRG2 participates in centrosome amplification in a p53-dependent manner. Depletion of ECRG2 not only destabilized p53, down-regulated p21, and increased the cyclin E/CDK2 activity, thus initiating centrosome amplification, but also abolished the ability of p53 localize to centrosomes. Overexpression of ECRG2 restored the p53-dependent suppression of centrosome duplication. Furthermore, ECRG2-depleted cells show severely disrupted spindle phenotype but fail to maintain the mitotic arrest due to minimal BUBR1 protein levels. Taken together, our results indicate that ECRG2 is important for ensuring centrosome duplication, spindle assembly checkpoint, and accurate chromosome segregation, and its depletion may contribute to chromosome instability and aneuploidy in human cancers.     

Drosophila checkpoint kinase 2 couples centrosome function and spindle assembly to genomic integrity

In syncytial Drosophila embryos, damaged or incompletely replicated DNA triggers centrosome disruption in mitosis, leading to defects in spindle assembly and anaphase chromosome segregation. The damaged nuclei drop from the cortex and are not incorporated into the cells that form the embryo proper. A null mutation in the Drosophila checkpoint kinase 2 tumor suppressor homolog (DmChk2) blocks this mitotic response to DNA lesions and also prevents loss of defective nuclei from the cortex. In addition, DNA damage leads to increased DmChk2 localization to the centrosome and spindle microtubules. DmChk2 is therefore essential for a "mitotic catastrophe" signal that disrupts centrosome function in response to genotoxic stress and ensures that mutant and aneuploid nuclei are eliminated from the embryonic precursor pool.     

Mutual regulation between the spindle checkpoint and APC/C

Accurate chromosome segregation during mitosis is critical for maintaining genomic stability. The spindle checkpoint is a cellular surveillance system that ensures the fidelity of chromosome segregation. In response to sister chromatids not properly captured by spindle microtubules, the spindle checkpoint interferes with the functions of Cdc20, the mitotic activator of the anaphase-promoting complex or cyclosome (APC/C), thereby blocking APC/C-mediated degradation of securin and cyclin B to delay anaphase onset. This review summarizes the recent progress on the mechanisms by which checkpoint proteins inhibit APC/C, the conformational and enzymatic activation of checkpoint proteins, and the emerging roles of APC/C-dependent ubiquitination in checkpoint inactivation.     

BRCA2 mediates centrosome cohesion via an interaction with cytoplasmic dynein

BRCA2 is responsible for familial breast and ovarian cancer and has been linked to DNA repair and centrosome duplication. Here we analyzed the mechanism by which the centrosomal localization signal (CLS) of BRCA2 interacts with cytoplasmic dynein 1 to localize BRCA2 to the centrosome. In vitro pull-down assays demonstrated that BRCA2 directly binds to the cytoplasmic dynein 1 light intermediate chain 2. A dominant-negative HA-CLS-DsRed fusion protein, the depletion of dynein by siRNA, and the inactivation of dynein by EHNA, inhibited the localization of BRCA2 at centrosomes and caused the separation of centrosome pairs during the S-phase. The double depletion of BRCA2 and C-Nap1 caused a larger dispersion of centrosome distances than the silencing of C-Nap1. These results suggest that cytoplasmic dynein 1 binds to BRCA2 through the latter's CLS and BRCA2 mediates the cohesion between centrosomes during the S phase, potentially serving as a cell-cycle checkpoint.     

Centrosome amplification and a defective G2-M cell cycle checkpoint induce genetic instability in BRCA1 exon 11 isoform-deficient cells

Germline mutations of the Brca1 tumor suppressor gene predispose women to breast and ovarian cancers. To study mechanisms underlying BRCA1-related tumorigenesis, we derived mouse embryonic fibroblast cells carrying a targeted deletion of exon 11 of the Brca1 gene. We show that the mutant cells maintain an intact G1-S cell cycle checkpoint and proliferate poorly. However, a defective G2-M checkpoint in these cells is accompanied by extensive chromosomal abnormalities. Mutant fibroblasts contain multiple, functional centrosomes, which lead to unequal chromosome segregation, abnormal nuclear division, and aneuploidy. These data uncover an essential role of BRCA1 in maintaining genetic stability through the regulation of centrosome duplication and the G2-M checkpoint and provide a molecular basis for the role of BRCA1 in tumorigenesis.     

Regulated inactivation of the spindle assembly checkpoint without functional mitotic spindles

The spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) arrests mitosis until bipolar attachment of spindle microtubules to all chromosomes is accomplished. However, when spindle formation is prevented and the SAC cannot be satisfied, mammalian cells can eventually overcome the mitotic arrest while the checkpoint is still activated. We find that Aspergillus nidulans cells, which are unable to satisfy the SAC, inactivate the checkpoint after a defined period of mitotic arrest. Such SAC inactivation allows normal nuclear reassembly and mitotic exit without DNA segregation. We demonstrate that the mechanisms, which govern such SAC inactivation, require protein synthesis and can occur independently of inactivation of the major mitotic regulator Cdk1/Cyclin B or mitotic exit. Moreover, in the continued absence of spindle function cells transit multiple cell cycles in which the SAC is reactivated each mitosis before again being inactivated. Such cyclic activation and inactivation of the SAC suggests that it is subject to cell-cycle regulation that is independent of bipolar spindle function.     

Chlamydia trachomatis infection causes mitotic spindle pole defects independently from its effects on centrosome amplification

Chlamydiae are Gram negative, obligate intracellular bacteria, and Chlamydia trachomatis is the etiologic agent of the most commonly reported sexually transmitted disease in the United States. Chlamydiae undergo a biphasic life cycle that takes place inside a parasitophorous vacuole termed an inclusion. Chlamydial infections have been epidemiologically linked to cervical cancer in patients previously infected by human papillomavirus (HPV). The inclusion associates very closely with host cell centrosomes, and this association is dependent upon the host motor protein dynein. We have previously reported that this interaction induces supernumerary centrosomes in infected cells, leading to multipolar mitotic spindles and inhibiting accurate chromosome segregation. Our findings demonstrate that chlamydial infection causes mitotic spindle defects independently of its effects on centrosome amplification. We show that chlamydial infection increases centrosome spread and inhibits the spindle assembly checkpoint delay to disrupt centrosome clustering. These data suggest that chlamydial infection exacerbates the consequences of centrosome amplification by inhibiting the cells' ability to suppress the effects of these defects on mitotic spindle organization. We hypothesize that these combined effects on mitotic spindle architecture identifies a possible mechanism for Chlamydia as a cofactor in cervical cancer formation.     

Chemical genetics reveals a role for Mps1 kinase in kinetochore attachment during mitosis

Accurate chromosome segregation depends on proper assembly and function of the kinetochore and the mitotic spindle. In the budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the highly conserved protein kinase Mps1 has well-characterized roles in spindle pole body (SPB, yeast centrosome equivalent) duplication and the mitotic checkpoint. However, an additional role for Mps1 is suggested by phenotypes of MPS1 mutations that include genetic interactions with kinetochore mutations and meiotic chromosome segregation defects and also by the localization of Mps1 at the kinetochore, the latter being independent of checkpoint activation. We have developed a new MPS1 allele, mps1-as1, that renders the kinase specifically sensitive to a cell-permeable ATP analog inhibitor, allowing us to perform high-resolution execution point experiments that identify a novel role for Mps1 subsequent to SPB duplication. We demonstrate, by using both fixed- and live-cell fluoresence techniques, that cells lacking Mps1 function show severe defects in mitotic spindle formation, sister kinetochore positioning at metaphase, and chromosome segregation during anaphase. Taken together, our experiments are consistent with an important role for Mps1 at the kinetochore in mitotic spindle assembly and function.     

Regulation of cyclin A localization downstream of Par-1 function is critical for the centrosome orientation checkpoint in Drosophila male germline stem cells

Male germline stem cells (GSCs) in Drosophila melanogaster divide asymmetrically by orienting the mitotic spindle with respect to the niche, a microenvironment that specifies stem cell identity. The spindle orientation is prepared during interphase through stereotypical positioning of the centrosomes. We recently demonstrated that GSCs possess a checkpoint ("the centrosome orientation checkpoint") that monitors correct centrosome orientation prior to mitosis to ensure an oriented spindle and thus asymmetric outcome of the division. Here, we show that Par-1, a serine/threonine kinase that regulates polarity in many systems, is involved in this checkpoint. Par-1 shows a cell cycle-dependent localization to the spectrosome, a germline-specific, endoplasmic reticulum-like organelle. Furthermore, the localization of cyclin A, which is normally localized to the spectrosome, is perturbed in par-1 mutant GSCs. Interestingly, overexpression of mutant cyclin A that does not localize to the spectrosome and mutation in hts, a core component of the spectrosome, both lead to defects in the centrosome orientation checkpoint. We propose that the regulation of cyclin A localization via Par-1 function plays a critical role in the centrosome orientation checkpoint.     

Mechanisms of genetic instability revealed by analysis of yeast spindle pole body duplication.

Aneuploidy and polyploidy are commonly observed in transformed cells. These states arise from failures during mitotic chromosome segregation, some of which can be traced to defects in the function or duplication of the centrosome. The centrosome is the organizing center for the mitotic spindle, and the equivalent organelle in the budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, is the spindle pole body. We review how defects in spindle pole body duplication or function lead to genetic instability in yeast. There are several well documented instances of genetic instability in yeast that can be traced to the spindle pole body, all of which serve as models for genetic instability in transformed cells.     

BRCA1-associated tumorigenesis: what have we learned from knockout mice?

A series of allelic mutations in the tumor suppressor Brca1 have been created to study mechanisms underlying BRCA1-associated tumorigenesis. Brca1 is essential in maintaining genome integrity through its involvement in DNA damage repair, G(2)-M cell-cycle checkpoint and centrosome duplication. The loss of Brca1 is not sufficient for malignant transformation, rather, it triggers multiple genetic alterations, including the inactivation of p53 and activation of a number of oncogenes, that ultimately result in mammary tumorigenesis.     

Critical role of DNA checkpoints in mediating genotoxic-stress-induced filamentous growth in Candida albicans

The polymorphic fungus Candida albicans switches from yeast to filamentous growth in response to a range of genotoxic insults, including inhibition of DNA synthesis by hydroxyurea (HU) or aphidicolin (AC), depletion of the ribonucleotide-reductase subunit Rnr2p, and DNA damage induced by methylmethane sulfonate (MMS) or UV light (UV). Deleting RAD53, which encodes a downstream effector kinase for both the DNA-replication and DNA-damage checkpoint pathways, completely abolished the filamentous growth caused by all the genotoxins tested. Deleting RAD9, which encodes a signal transducer of the DNA-damage checkpoint, specifically blocked the filamentous growth induced by MMS or UV but not that induced by HU or AC. Deleting MRC1, the counterpart of RAD9 in the DNA-replication checkpoint, impaired DNA synthesis and caused cell elongation even in the absence of external genotoxic insults. Together, the results indicate that the DNA-replication/damage checkpoints are critically required for the induction of filamentous growth by genotoxic stress. In addition, either of two mutations in the FHA1 domain of Rad53p, G65A, and N104A, nearly completely blocked the filamentous-growth response but had no significant deleterious effect on cell-cycle arrest. These results suggest that the FHA domain, known for its ability to bind phosphopeptides, has an important role in mediating genotoxic-stress-induced filamentous growth and that such growth is a specific, Rad53p-regulated cellular response in C. albicans.