ACF catalyses chromatosome movements in chromatin fibres

Nucleosome-remodelling factors containing the ATPase ISWI, such as ACF, render DNA in chromatin accessible by promoting the sliding of histone octamers. Although the ATP-dependent repositioning of mononucleosomes is readily observable in vitro, it is unclear to which extent nucleosomes can be moved in physiological chromatin, where neighbouring nucleosomes, linker histones and the folding of the nucleosomal array restrict mobility. We assembled arrays consisting of 12 nucleosomes or 12 chromatosomes (nucleosomes plus linker histone) from defined components and subjected them to remodelling by ACF or the ATPase CHD1. Both factors increased the access to DNA in nucleosome arrays. ACF, but not CHD1, catalysed profound movements of nucleosomes throughout the array, suggesting different remodelling mechanisms. Linker histones inhibited remodelling by CHD1. Surprisingly, ACF catalysed significant repositioning of entire chromatosomes in chromatin containing saturating levels of linker histone H1. H1 inhibited the ATP-dependent generation of DNA accessibility by only about 50%. This first demonstration of catalysed chromatosome movements suggests that the bulk of interphase euchromatin may be rendered dynamic by dedicated nucleosome-remodelling factors.     

Novel nucleosomal particles containing core histones and linker DNA but no histone H1

Eukaryotic chromosomal DNA is assembled into regularly spaced nucleosomes, which play a central role in gene regulation by determining accessibility of control regions. The nucleosome contains ∼147 bp of DNA wrapped ∼1.7 times around a central core histone octamer. The linker histone, H1, binds both to the nucleosome, sealing the DNA coils, and to the linker DNA between nucleosomes, directing chromatin folding. Micrococcal nuclease (MNase) digests the linker to yield the chromatosome, containing H1 and ∼160 bp, and then converts it to a core particle, containing ∼147 bp and no H1. Sequencing of nucleosomal DNA obtained after MNase digestion (MNase-seq) generates genome-wide nucleosome maps that are important for understanding gene regulation. We present an improved MNase-seq method involving simultaneous digestion with exonuclease III, which removes linker DNA. Remarkably, we discovered two novel intermediate particles containing 154 or 161 bp, corresponding to 7 bp protruding from one or both sides of the nucleosome core. These particles are detected in yeast lacking H1 and in H1-depleted mouse chromatin. They can be reconstituted in vitro using purified core histones and DNA. We propose that these ‘proto-chromatosomes’ are fundamental chromatin subunits, which include the H1 binding site and influence nucleosome spacing independently of H1.     

Histone H2A ubiquitination does not preclude histone H1 binding, but it facilitates its association with the nucleosome

Histone H2A ubiquitination is a bulky posttranslational modification that occurs at the vicinity of the binding site for linker histones in the nucleosome. Therefore, we took several experimental approaches to investigate the role of ubiquitinated H2A (uH2A) in the binding of linker histones. Our results showed that uH2A was present in situ in histone H1-containing nucleosomes. Notably in vitro experiments using nucleosomes reconstituted onto 167-bp random sequence and 208-bp (5 S rRNA gene) DNA fragments showed that ubiquitination of H2A did not prevent binding of histone H1 but it rather enhanced the binding of this histone to the nucleosome. We also showed that ubiquitination of H2A did not affect the positioning of the histone octamer in the nucleosome in either the absence or the presence of linker histones.     

Atomic force microscopy sees nucleosome positioning and histone H1-induced compaction in reconstituted chromatin.

We addressed the question of how nuclear histones and DNA interact and form a nucleosome structure by applying atomic force microscopy to an in vitro reconstituted chromatin system. The molecular images obtained by atomic force microscopy demonstrated that oligonucleosomes reconstituted with purified core histones and DNA yielded a 'beads on a string' structure with each nucleosome trapping 158 +/- 27 bp DNA. When dinucleosomes were assembled on a DNA fragment containing two tandem repeats of the positioning sequence of the Xenopus 5S RNA gene, two nucleosomes were located around each positioning sequence. The spacing of the nucleosomes fluctuated in the absence of salt and the nucleosomes were stabilized around the range of the positioning signals in the presence of 50 mM NaCl. An addition of histone H1 to the system resulted in a tight compaction of the dinucleosomal structure.     

Two DNA-binding sites on the globular domain of histone H5 are required for binding to both bulk and 5 S reconstituted nucleosomes

We have previously shown the existence of two DNA-binding sites on the globular domain of H5 (termed GH5), both of which are required for nucleosome organisation, as judged by the protection of a 166 bp chromatosome intermediate during micrococcal nuclease digestion of chromatin. This supports a model in which GH5 contacts two duplexes on the nucleosome. However, studies of a nucleosome assembled on the 5 S rRNA gene have argued against the requirement for two DNA-binding sites for chromatosome protection, which has implications for the role of linker histones. We have used this proposed difference in the requirement for a second site on the globular domain in the two models as a means of investigating whether bulk and reconstituted 5 S nucleosomes are indeed fundamentally different. GH5 protects a 166 bp chromatosome in both "bulk" and 5 S systems, and in both cases protection is abolished when all four basic residues in site II are replaced by alanine. Binding to four-way DNA junctions, which present a pair of juxtaposed duplexes, is also abolished. Single mutations of the basic residues did not abolish chromatosome protection in either system, or binding to four-way junctions, suggesting that the residues function as a cluster. Both bulk and 5 S nucleosomes thus require a functional second DNA-binding site on GH5 in order to bind properly to the nucleosome. This is likely to reflect a similar mode of binding in each case, in which two DNA duplexes are contacted in the nucleosome. There is no indication from these experiments that linker histones bind fundamentally differently to 5 S and bulk nucleosomes.     

HMG-D and histone H1 alter the local accessibility of nucleosomal DNA

There is evidence that HMGB proteins facilitate, while linker histones inhibit chromatin remodelling, respectively. We have examined the effects of HMG-D and histone H1/H5 on accessibility of nucleosomal DNA. Using the 601.2 nucleosome positioning sequence designed by Widom and colleagues we assembled nucleosomes in vitro and probed DNA accessibility with restriction enzymes in the presence or absence of HMG-D and histone H1/H5. For HMG-D our results show increased digestion at two spatially adjacent sites, the dyad and one terminus of nucleosomal DNA. Elsewhere varying degrees of protection from digestion were observed. The C-terminal acidic tail of HMG-D is essential for this pattern of accessibility. Neither the HMG domain by itself nor in combination with the adjacent basic region is sufficient. Histone H1/H5 binding produces two sites of increased digestion on opposite faces of the nucleosome and decreased digestion at all other sites. Our results provide the first evidence of local changes in the accessibility of nucleosomal DNA upon separate interaction with two linker binding proteins.     

Signals in chicken beta-globin DNA influence chromatin assembly in vitro.

We have confirmed the result that chicken beta-globin gene chromatin, which possesses the characteristics of active chromatin in erythroid cells, has shortened internucleosome spacings compared with bulk chromatin or that of the ovalbumin gene, which is inactive. To understand how the short (approximately 180-bp) nucleosome repeat arises specifically on beta-globin DNA, we have studied chromatin assembly of cloned chicken beta-globin DNA in a defined in vitro system. With chicken erythrocyte core histones and linker histone H5 as the only cellular components, a cloned 6.2-kb chicken beta-globin DNA fragment assembled into chromatin possessing a regular 180 +/- 5-bp repeat, very similar to what is observed in erythroid cells. A 2-kb DNA subfragment containing the beta A gene and promoter region, but lacking the downstream intergenic region between the beta A and epsilon genes, failed to generate a regular nucleosome array in vitro, suggesting that the intergenic region facilitates linker histone-induced nucleosome alignment. When the beta A gene was placed on a plasmid that contained a known chromatin-organizing signal, nucleosome alignment with a 180-bp periodicity was restored, whereas nucleosomes on flanking plasmid sequences possessed a 210-bp spacing periodicity. Our results suggest that the shortened 180-bp nucleosome spacing periodicity observed in erythroid cells is encoded in the beta-globin DNA sequence and that nucleosome alignment by linker histones is facilitated by sequences in the beta A-epsilon intergenic region.     

Assembly of correctly spaced chromatin in a nuclear extract from Xenopus laevis oocytes.

Assembly of nucleosomes on relaxed, covalently closed DNA has been studied in a nuclear extract of Xenopus laevis oocytes. Nucleosomes containing the four histones H3, H4, H2A and H2B but lacking histone H1 are readily assembled on the DNA. The pattern of micrococcal nuclease digestion shows that the nucleosomes assembled in the absence of ATP and Mg (II) are closely packed, with a periodicity of 150 base pairs (bp). In contrast, in the presence of ATP and Mg (II) the spacing of the nucleosomes is 180 bp, similar to that observed for nucleosomes assembled on DNA microinjected into oocyte nuclei. The ATP and Mg (II) requirements for the assembly of correctly spaced nucleosomes are unrelated to the activity of the ATP and Mg (II) dependent DNA topoisomerase II in the extract; addition of specific inhibitors of eukaryotic DNA topoisomerase II has no effect on the spacing of the reconstituted nucleosomes. The ATP requirement in the assembly of correctly spaced nucleosomes can be substituted by adenosine 5'-O-3'-thiotriphosphate (gamma-S-ATP) but not by adenyl-5'-yl imidodiphosphate (AMP-P-(NH)-P).     

Chromatin compaction at the mononucleosome level

Using a previously described FRET technique, we measured the distance between the ends of DNA fragments on which nucleosomes were reconstituted from recombinant and native histones. This distance was analyzed in its dependence on the DNA fragment length, concentration of mono- and divalent counterions, presence of linker histone H1, and histone modifications. We found that the linker DNA arms do not cross under all conditions studied but diverge slightly as they leave the histone core surface. Histone H1 leads to a global approach of the linker DNA arms, confirming the notion of a "stem structure". Increasing salt concentration also leads to an approach of the linker DNAs. To study the effect of acetylation, we compared chemically acetylated recombinant histones with histones prepared from HeLa cells, characterizing the sites of acetylation by mass spectroscopy. Nucleosomes from chemically acetylated histones have few modifications in the core domain and form nucleosomes normally. Acetylating all histones or selectively only H3 causes an opening of the nucleosome structure, indicated by the larger distances between the linker DNA ends. Selective acetylation of H4 distances the linker ends for short fragments but causes them to approach each other for fragments longer than 180 bp.     

The interaction of histone H5 and its globular domain with core particles, depleted chromatosomes, polynucleosomes, and a DNA decamer

Certain features of linker histone behavior were analyzed using a precipitation and a nitrocellulose filter binding assay. Chromatosomes, depleted of the linker histones, present one unique binding site to the globular domain of histone H5 (GH5) which involves the two 10-base pair DNA ends of the chromatosome. Additional binding to lower affinity sites is intrinsically different and results in aggregation as does all binding to core particles. These findings, as well as the binding study on a synthetic DNA decamer, lend support to earlier hypotheses of more than one DNA binding site on the globular domain. Our studies provide a deeper insight into the long standing question of H5/nucleosome stoichiometry. A salt dependence analysis of GH5 binding to H5-depleted chromatosomes indicates that GH5 displaces a number of ions similar to the total H1 linker histone, suggesting a delocalized binding of the carboxyl- and amino-terminal tails.     

A model chromatin assembly system. Factors affecting nucleosome spacing

Poly[d(A-T)].poly[d(A-T)], when reconstituted with chicken erythrocyte core histones and subsequently incubated with sufficient histone H5 in a solution containing polyglutamic acid, forms structures resembling chromatin. H5 induces nucleosome alignment in about two hours at physiological ionic strength and 37 degrees C. The nucleosome spacing and apparent linker heterogeneity in the assembled nucleoprotein are very similar to those in chicken erythrocyte chromatin. Also, condensed chromatin-like fibers on the polynucleotide can be visualized. The binding of one mole of H5 per mole of core octamer is necessary to generate the physiological nucleosome spacing, which remains constant with the addition of more H5. The nucleosome repeat length is not a function of the core histone to poly[d(A-T)] ratio for values lower than the physiological ratio. With increasing ratios, in excess of the physiological value, nucleosome spacing first becomes non-uniform, and then takes on the close packing limit of approximately 165 base-pairs. In addition to eliminating possible base sequence effects on nucleosome positioning, poly[d(A-T)] allows nucleosomes to slide more readily than does DNA, thereby facilitating alignment. Evidence is presented that polyglutamic acid facilitates the nucleosome spacing activity of histone H5, primarily by keeping the nucleoprotein soluble. This model system should be useful for understanding how different repeat lengths arise in chromatin.     

Isw1a does not have strict limitations on the length of extranucleosomal DNAs for mobilization of nucleosomes assembled with HeLa cell histones

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Isw1a and Isw2 ATP-dependent chromatin-remodeling complexes have important roles in vivo in the regulation of nucleosome positioning and modulation of gene activity. We studied the ability of the Isw1a- and Isw2-remodeling enzymes to reposition nucleosomes in mono- and dinucleosomes templates with variably positioned histone octamers (in the center or at the ends of the DNA fragment). To compare the Isw1a and Isw2 nucleosome-mobilizing activities, we utilized mono- and dinucleosome templates reconstituted with purified HeLa cell histones and DNA containing one or two copies of the “601” nucleosome high-affinity sequence used to specifically position nucleosomes on the DNA. The obtained data suggest that Isw1a is able to mobilize HeLa cell histone-assembled mononucleosomes with long (more than 30?bp) extranucleosomal DNAs protruding from both sides, which contrasts to the previously reported inability of Isw1 to mobilize similar nucleosomes assembled with recombinant yeast histones. The results also suggest that Isw1a and Isw2 can mobilize nucleosomes with unfavorably short linker DNA lengths, and the presence of internucleosomal interactions promotes mobilization of nucleosomes even when the linkers are short.     

Generation of different nucleosome spacing periodicities in vitro. Possible origin of cell type specificity

We have been able to generate ordered nucleosome arrays that span the physiological range of spacing periodicities, using an in vitro system. Our system (a refinement of the procedure previously developed) uses the synthetic polynucleotide poly[d(A-T)], poly[d(A-T)], core histones, purified H1, and polyglutamic acid, a factor that increases nucleohistone solubility and greatly promotes the formation of ordered nucleosome arrays. This system has three useful features, not found in other chromatin assembly systems. First, it allowed us to examine histones from three different cell types/species (sea urchin sperm, chicken erythrocyte, and HeLa) as homologous or heterologous combinations of core and H1 histones. Second, it allowed us to control the average packing density (core histone to polynucleotide weight ratio) of nucleosomes on the polynucleotide; histone H1 is added in a second distinct step in the procedure to induce nucleosome alignment. Third, it permitted us to study nucleosome array formation in the absence of DNA base sequence effects. We show that the value of the spacing periodicity is controlled by the value of the initial average nucleosome packing density. The full range of physiological periodicities appears to be accessible to arrays generated using chicken erythrocyte (or HeLa) core histones in combination with chicken H5. However, chromatin-like structures cannot be assembled for some nucleosome packing densities in reactions involving some histone types, thus limiting the range of periodicities that can be achieved. For example, H1 histone types differ significantly in their ability to recruit disordered nucleosomes into ordered arrays at low packing densities. Sea urchin sperm H1 is more efficient than chicken H5, which is more efficient than H1 from HeLa or chicken erythrocyte. Sea urchin sperm core histones are more efficient in this respect than the other core histone types used. These findings suggest how different repeat lengths arise in different cell types and species, and provide new insights into the problems of nucleosome linker heterogeneity and how different types of chromatin structures could be generated in the same cell.     

Effect of salt on the binding of the linker histone H1 to DNA and nucleosomes

The linker histones are involved in the salt-dependent folding of the nucleosomes into higher-order chromatin structures. To better understand the mechanism of action of these histones in chromatin, we studied the interactions of the linker histone H1 with DNA at various histone/DNA ratios and at different ionic strengths. In direct competition experiments, we have confirmed the binding of H1 to superhelical DNA in preference to linear or nicked circular DNA forms. We show that the electrophoretic mobility of the H1/supercoiled DNA complex decreases with increasing H1 concentrations and increases with ionic strengths. These results indicate that the interaction of the linker histone H1 with supercoiled DNA results in a soluble binding of H1 with DNA at low H1 or salt concentrations and aggregation at higher H1 concentrations. Moreover, we show that H1 dissociates from the DNA or nucleosomes at high salt concentrations. By the immobilized template pull-down assay, we confirm these data using the physiologically relevant nucleosome array template.     

Differential association of linker histones H1 and H5 with telomeric nucleosomes in chicken erythrocytes.

Rat liver telomeric DNA is organised into nucleosomes characterised by a shorter and more homogeneous average nucleosomal repeat than bulk chromatin as shown by Makarov et al. (1). The latter authors were unable to detect the association of any linker histone with the telomeric DNA. We have confirmed these observations but show that in sharp contrast chicken erythrocyte telomeric DNA is organised into nucleosomes whose spacing length and heterogeneity are indistinguishable from those of bulk chromatin. We further show that chicken erythrocyte telomeric chromatin contains chromatosomes which are preferentially associated with histone H1 relative to histone H5. This contrasts with bulk chromatin where histone H5 is the more abundant species. This observation strongly suggests that telomeric DNA condensed into nucleosome core particles has a higher affinity for H1 than H5. We discuss the origin of the discrimination of the lysine rich histones in terms of DNA sequence preferences, telomere nucleosome preferences and particular constraints of the higher order chromatin structure of telomeres.