Diversity in spindle morphology in Arabidopsis root tip

A primary function of the spindle apparatus is to segregate chromosomes into two equal sets in a dividing cell. It is unclear whether spindles in different cell types play additional roles in cellular regulation. As a first step in revealing new functions of spindles, we investigated spindle morphology in different cell types in Arabidopsis roots in the wild-type and the cytokinesis defective1 (cyd1) mutant backgrounds. cyd1 provides cells larger than those of the wild type for testing the cell size effect on spindle morphology. Our observations indicate that cell type (shape), not cell size, is likely a factor affecting spindle morphology. At least three spindle types were observed, including small spindles with pointed poles in narrow cells, large barrel-shaped spindles (without pointed poles) in wide cells, and spindles intermediate in pole focus and size in other cells. We hypothesize that the cell-type-associated spindle diversity may be an integral part of the cell differentiation processes.Key words: spindle pole, microtubule, morphogenesis, cell type, metaphaseThe cellular apparatus for chromosome segregation during mitosis is typically described as a spindle composed of microtubules and microtubule-associated proteins. Research on the structure and function of the spindle is usually conducted under the assumption that spindles are structurally the same or alike in different cell types in an organism. If the assumption is true, it would indicate that either the intracellular conditions in different dividing cells are very similar or the assembly and maintenance of the spindle are insensitive to otherwise variable intracellular conditions. But experimental evidence related to this assumption is relatively sparse.The root tip in Arabidopsis, as in other higher plants, contains dividing cells of different shapes and sizes. These cells include both meristem initial and derivative cells, with the former and latter being proximal and distal to the quiescent center, respectively.¹ The diversity in dividing cells in the root tip provides an opportunity for testing whether the spindles also exhibit diversity in morphology. To visualize the spindles at the metaphase stage in the root tip cells, we conducted indirect immunofluorescence labeling of the β-tubulin in single cells prepared from wild-type Arabidopsis (in Col-0 background) root tips as previously described in references ² and ³. The spindles in cells of different morphologies were then observed under a confocal laser scanning microscope.³ Three types of spindle were detected. The first type (Fig. 1A) was the smallest in width and length and had the most-pointed poles among the three types. The second type (Fig. 1B) was wider and longer than the first type but with less-pointed poles than the first type. The third type (Fig. 1C) was similar in height to the second type but lacked the pointed poles. In fact, the third type is shaped more like a barrel than a spindle. The first type was found in cells narrow in the direction parallel to the equatorial plane of the spindle, a situation opposite to that of the third type whose cells were wide in the equatorial direction. The wide cells containing the barrel-shaped spindles likely belonged to the epidermal layer in the root tip.¹ The second type was found in cells intermediate in width. Examples of metaphase spindles morphologically resembling the three types of spindles in Arabidopsis root can also be found in a previous report by Xu et al. even although spindle diversity was not the subject of the report.⁴ In Xu et al.''s report, type 1- or 2-like metaphase spindles can be identified in Figures 2B and 3A, and type 3-like metaphase spindles can be identified in Figures 1A and 3B. These observations indicate that at least three types of spindles exist in the root cells.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Spindles in wild-type root cells. (A) Type-1 spindle. (B) Type-2 spindle. (C) Type-3 spindle. The spots without fluorescence signals in the middle of the spindles are where the chromosomes were located. Scale bar for all the figures = 20 µm.Open in a separate windowFigure 2Spindles in cyd1 root cells. (A) Type-1 spindle. Arrows indicate the upper and lower boundaries of the cell. (B and C) Two type-2 spindles. (D and E) Two type-3 spindles. (F) DAPI-staining image corresponding to (E), showing chromosomes at the equatorial plane. Scale bar for the images = 20 µm.The above observations suggest that either the cell size or the cell type (shape) might be a factor in the type of spindle found in a specific cell. To further investigate the relationship between cell morphology and spindle morphology, we studied metaphase spindles in root cells of the cytokinesis defective1 (cyd1) mutant.⁵ Because the root cells in cyd1 were larger than corresponding cells in the wild type, presumably due to abnormal polyploidization prior to the collection of the root cells,^5,6 this investigation might reveal a relationship between increasing cell size and altered spindle morphology. A pattern of different spindle types in different cell types similar to that in the wild type was observed in cyd1 (Fig. 2). Figures 2A–C show narrow cells that contained spindles with pointed poles even though the spindles differed in size and focus. Figure 2D shows a barrel-shaped spindle in a wide cell, resembling Figure 1C in overall appearance. The large number of chromosomes at metaphase (more than the diploid number of 10) in Figure 2F indicates that the cells in Figure 2 were polyploid. These figures thus demonstrate that the enlargement in cell size did not alter the pattern of types 1 and 2 spindles in narrow cells, as well as type 3 spindles in wide cells. Moreover, the edges of the spindles in Figure 2B and E were similarly distanced to the cell walls in the equatorial plane, and yet they differ greatly in shape with the former being type 2 and the latter being type 3. This finding argues against that the cell width in the equatorial direction dictates the spindle shape. On the other hand, the cells in Figure 2B and E are obviously of different types. Taken together, these observations suggest that the spindle diversity in both wild type and cyd1 is associated with cell-type diversity.It is unclear whether the different spindle types have different functions in their respective cell types, in addition to the usual role for chromosome segregation. One possibility is that, at the ensuing telophase, the pointed spindles result in compact chromosomal congregation at the poles whereas the barrel-shaped spindles result in loose chromosomal congregation at the poles, which in turn may differentially affect the shape of the subsequently formed daughter nuclei and their organization. Different nuclear shape and organization are likely to be integrated into the processes that confer cell differentiation.     

Dynamic protein trafficking to the cell wall

Recently we have studied the secretion pattern of a pectin methylesterase inhibitor protein (PMEI1) and a polygalacturonase inhibitor protein (PGIP2) in tobacco protoplast using the protein fusions, secGFP-PMEI1 and PGIP2-GFP. Both chimeras reach the cell wall by passing through the endomembrane system but using distinct mechanisms and through a pathway distinguishable from the default sorting of a secreted GFP. After reaching the apoplast, sec-GFP-PMEI1 is stably accumulated in the cell wall, while PGIP2-GFP undergoes endocytic trafficking. Here we describe the final localization of PGIP2-GFP in the vacuole, evidenced by co-localization with the marker Aleu-RFP, and show a graphic elaboration of its sorting pattern. A working model taking into consideration the presence of a regulated apoplast-targeted secretion pathway is proposed.Key words: cell wall trafficking, endocytosis, GPI-anchor, PGIP2, PMEI1, secretion pathway, vacuole fluorescent markerCell wall biogenesis, growth, differentiation and remodeling, as well as wall-related signaling and defense responses depend on the functionality of the secretory pathway. Matrix polysaccharides, synthesized in the Golgi stacks, and cell wall proteins, synthesized in the ER, are packaged into secretory vesicles that fuse with the plasma membrane (PM) releasing their cargo into the cell wall. Also the synthesis and deposition of cellulose itself are driven by the endomembrane system which controls the assembly, within the Golgi, and the export to the plasma membrane of rosette complexes of cellulose synthase.¹ Secretion to the cell wall has always been considered a default pathway² but recent studies have evidenced a complex regulation of wall component trafficking that does not seem to follow the default secretion model. Recent evidence that several cell wall proteins are retained in the Golgi stacks until specific signals at the N-terminal domain are proteolitically removed is a case in point.^3–5 Moreover, it has previously been reported that secretion of exogenous marker proteins (secGFP and secRGUS) and cell wall polysaccharides reach the PM through different pathways.⁶ More recently, we have reported that cell wall protein trafficking also occurs through mechanisms distinguishable from that of a secreted GFP suggesting that more complex events than the mechanisms of bulk flow control cell wall growth and differentiation.⁷ To follow cell wall protein trafficking we used a Phaseolus vulgaris polygalacturonase inhibitor protein (PGIP2) and an Arabidopsis pectin methylesterase inhibitor protein (PMEI1) fused to GFP (PGIP2-GFP and secGFP-PMEI1). Both apoplastic proteins are involved in the remodeling of pectin network with different mechanisms. PGIP2 specifically inhibits exogenous fungal polygalacturonases (PGs) and is involved in the plant defense mechanisms against pathogenic fungi.^8,9 PMEI1 counteracts endogenous PME and takes part in the physiological synthesis and remodeling of the cell wall during growth and differentiation.^10,11 The specific functions of the two apoplastic proteins seem to be strictly related to the distinct mechanisms that control their secretion and stability in the cell wall. In fact, while secGFP-PMEI1 moves through ER and Golgi stacks linked to a glycosyl phosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchor, PGIP2-GFP moves as a cargo soluble protein. Furthermore, secGFP-PMEI1 is stably accumulated in the cell wall, while PGIP2-GFP, over the time, is internalized into endosomes and targeted to vacuole, likely for degradation. After reaching the cell wall, the different fate of the two proteins seems to be strictly related to the presence/absence of their physiological counteractors. PMEI regulates the demethylesterification of homogalacturonan by inhibiting pectin methyl esterase (PME) activity through the formation of a reversible 1:1 complex which is stable in the acidic cell wall environment.¹² Stable wall localization of PMEI1 is likely related to its interaction with endogenous PME, always present in the wall. Unlike PMEs, fungal polygalacturonases (PGs), the physiological interactors of PGIP2, are present in the cell wall only during a pathogen attack. The absence of PGs may determine PGIP2 internalization. Internalization events have been already reported for PM proteins,^13–16 while cell wall protein internalization is surely a less well-known event. To date, only internalization of an Arabidopsis pollen-specific PME^4,5,17 and PGIP2 ⁷ has been reported.To further confirm the internalization of PGIP2-GFP and its final localization into the vacuole, we constructed a red fluorescent variant (RFP) of the green fluorescent marker protein that accumulates in lytic or acidic vacuole because of the barley aleurain sorting determinants (Aleu-RFP).¹⁸ The localization of PGIP2-GFP was compared to that of Aleu-RFP by confocal microscopy in tobacco protoplasts transiently expressing both fusions. Sixty hours after transformation, PGIP2-GFP labeled the central vacuole as indicated by complete co-localization with the vacuolar marker (Fig. 1A–D). Instead, at the same time point, secGFP-PMEI1 still labeled the cell wall (Fig. 1E–H) and never reached the vacuolar compartment. To summarize PGIP2-GFP secretion pattern, a graphic elaboration of confocal images is reported describing the sorting of PGIP2GFP in tobacco protoplast (Fig. 1I). The protein transits through the endomembrane system (green) and reaches the cell wall which is rapidly regenerating as evidenced by immunostaining with the red monoclonal antibody JIM7 that binds to methylesterified pectins.¹⁹ PGIP2-GFP is then internalized in endosomes, labeled in yellow because of the co-localization with the styryl dye FM4-64, a red marker of the endocytic pathway.Open in a separate windowFigure 1PGIP2-GFP, but not secGFP-PMEI1, is internalized and reaches the vacuole in tobacco leaf protoplasts. (A) Approximately 60 h after transformation, PGIP2-GFP labeled the central vacuole as indicated by co-localization with the vacuole marker Aleu-RFP (B). (C) Merged image of (A and B). (D) Differential interference contrast (DIC) image of (A–C). On the contrary, secGFP-PMEI1 still labeled cell wall (E). (F) No co-localization is present in the vacuole labeled by Aleu-RFP. (G) Merged image of (E and F). (H) DIC image of (E–G). (I) Graphic elaboration of confocal images describing the sorting of PGIP2. The protein is sorted by the endomembrane system (green) to the cell wall (red) that is regenerated by the protoplast. Lacking the specific ligand, it is then internalized in endosome (yellow). Details are reported in the text.In Figure 2 we propose a model of the mechanism of secGFP-PMEI1 and PGIP2-GFP secretion derived from the different lines of evidence previously reported in reference ⁷. SecGFPPMEI1 (Fig. 2-1), but not PGIP2-GFP (Fig. 2-2), carries a GPI-anchor, required for its secretion to the cell wall. When the anchorage of GPI is inhibited by mannosamine (Fig. 2-a) or by the fusion of GFP to the C-terminus of PMEI1 (Fig. 2-b), the two non-anchored proteins accumulate in the Golgi stacks. Evidence of retention in Golgi stacks has already been reported for other two cell wall proteins.^3–5 Unlike secGFP-PMEI1, PGIP2-GFP is not stably accumulated in the cell wall and undergoes endocytic trafficking (Fig. 2-3). PGIP2-GFP internalization, likely due to the absence of PGs, might also be related with its ability to interact with homogalacturonan and oligogalacturonides,²⁰ which have been reported to internalize^21,22 (Fig. 2-4). Since SYP 121, a Qa-SNARE, is involved in the default secretion of secGFP,²³ but not in secretion of PGIP2-GFP and secGFP-PMEI1, trafficking mechanisms underlying secretion into the apoplast are likely different from those underlying the default route (Figs. 2-5). Taken as a whole, evidence suggests the existence of currently undefined signals that control apoplast-targeted secretion.Open in a separate windowFigure 2Schematic illustration for secGFP-PMEI1 and PGIP2-GFP trafficking. See text for details.     

Glutathione signaling acts through NPR1-dependent SA-mediated pathway to mitigate biotic stress

Glutathione (GSH) has widely been known to be a multifunctional molecule especially as an antioxidant up until now, but has found a new role in plant defense signaling. Research from the past three decades indicate that GSH is a player in pathogen defense in plants, but the mechanism underlying this has not been elucidated fully. We have recently shown that GSH acts as a signaling molecule and mitigates biotic stress through non-expressor of PR genes 1 (NPR1)-dependent salicylic acid (SA)-mediated pathway. Transgenic tobacco with enhanced level of GSH (NtGB lines) was found to synthesize more SA, was capable of enhanced expression of genes belonging to NPR1-dependent SA-mediated pathway, were resistant to Pseudomonas syringae, the biotrophic pathogen and many SA-related proteins were upregulated. These results gathered experimental evidence on the mechanism through which GSH combats biotic stress. In continuation with our previous investigation we show here that the expression of glutathione S-transferase (GST), the NPR1-independent SA-mediated gene was unchanged in transgenic tobacco with enhanced level of GSH as compared to wild-type plants. Additionally, the transgenic plants were barely resistant to Botrytis cinerea, the necrotrophic pathogen. SA-treatment led to enhanced level of expression of pathogenesis-related protein gene (PR1) and PR4 as against short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase family protein (SDRLP) and allene oxide synthase (AOS). These data provided significant insight into the involvement of GSH in NPR1-dependent SA-mediated pathway in mitigating biotic stress.Key words: GSH, signaling molecule, biotrophic pathogen, NPR-1, PR-1, PR-4, transgenic tobaccoPlant responses to different environmental stresses are achieved through integrating shared signaling networks and mediated by the synergistic or antagonistic interactions with the phytohormones viz. SA, jasmonic acid (JA), ethylene (ET), abscisic acid (ABA) and reactive oxygen species (ROS).¹ Previous studies have shown that in response to pathogen attack, plants produce a highly specific blend of SA, JA and ET, resulting in the activation of distinct sets of defense-related genes.^2,3 Regulatory functions for ROS in defense, with a focus on the response to pathogen infection occur in conjunction with other plant signaling molecules, particularly with SA and nitric oxide (NO).^4–6 Till date, numerous physiological functions have been attributed to GSH in plants.^7–11 In addition to previous studies, recent study has also shown that GSH acts as a signaling molecule in combating biotic stress through NPR1-dependent SA-mediated pathway.^12,13Our recent investigation involved raising of transgenic tobacco overexpressing gamma-glutamylcysteine synthetase (γ-ECS), the rate-limiting enzyme of the GSH biosynthetic pathway.¹² The stable integration and enhanced expression of the transgene at the mRNA as well as protein level was confirmed by Southern blot, quantitative RT-PCR and western blot analysis respectively. The transgenic plants of the T₂ generation (Fig. 1), the phenotype of which was similar to that of wild-type plants were found to be capable of synthesizing enhanced amount of GSH as confirmed by HPLC analysis.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Transgenic tobacco of T₂ generation, (A) three-week-old plant, (B) mature plant.In the present study, the expression profile of GST was analyzed in NtGB lines by quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) and found that the expression level of this gene is unchanged in NtGB lines as compared to wild-type plants (Fig. 2). GST is known to be a NPR1-independent SA-related gene.¹⁴ This suggests that GSH does not follow the NPR1-independent SA-mediated pathway in defense signaling.Open in a separate windowFigure 2Expression pattern of GST in wild-type and NtGB lines.Disease test assay with NtGB lines and wild-type plants was performed using B. cinerea and the NtGB lines showed negligible rate of resistance to this necrotrophic pathogen (Fig. 3). SA signaling has been known to control defense against biotrophic pathogen in contrast, JA/ET signaling controls defense against necrotrophic pathogen.^1,15 Thus it has again been proved that GSH is not an active member in the crosstalk of JA-mediated pathway, rather it follows the SA-mediated pathway as has been evidenced earlier.¹²Open in a separate windowFigure 3Resistance pattern of wild-type and NtGB lines against Botrytis cinerea.Additionally, the leaves of wild-type and NtGB lines were treated with 1 mM SA and the expression of PR1, SDRLP, AOS and PR4 genes were analyzed and compared to untreated plants to simulate pathogen infection. The expression of PR1 increased after exogenous application of SA. In case of PR4, the ET marker, the expression level increased in NtGB lines. On the other hand, the level of SDRLP was nearly the same. However, the expression of AOS was absent in SA-treated leaves (Fig. 4). PR1 has been known to be induced by SA-treatment¹⁶ which can be corroborated with our results. In addition, ET is known to enhance SA/NPR1-dependent defense responses,¹⁷ which was reflected in our study as well. AOS, the biosynthetic pathway gene of JA, further known to be the antagonist of SA, was downregulated in SA-treated plants.Open in a separate windowFigure 4Gene expression pattern of PR1, SDRLP, PR4 and AOS in untreated and SA-treated wildtype and NtGB lines.Taken together, it can be summarized that this study provided new evidence on the involvement of GSH with SA in NPR1-dependent manner in combating biotic stress. Additionally, it can be claimed that GSH is a signaling molecule which takes an active part in the cross-communication with other established signaling molecules like SA, JA, ET in induced defense responses and has an immense standpoint in plant defense signaling.     

Thigmomorphogenesis in Solanum lycopersicum: Morphological and biochemical responses in stem after mechanical stimulation

The activation of the phenylpropanoid pathway in plants by environmental stimuli is one of the most universal biochemical stress responses known. In tomato plant, rubbing applied to a young internode inhibit elongation of the rubbed internode and his neighboring one. These morphological changes were correlated with an increase in lignification enzyme activities, phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL), cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase (CAD) and peroxidases (POD), 24 hours after rubbing of the forth internode. Furthermore, a decrease in indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) content was detected in the rubbed internode and the upper one. Taken together, our results suggest that decrease in rubbed internode length is a consequence of IAA oxidation, increases in enzyme activities (PAL, CAD and POD), and cell wall rigidification associated with induction of lignification process.Key words: Mechanical stimulation, PAL, CAD, POD, IAAIn their environment, plants are constantly submitted to several stimuli such as wind, rain and wounding. The growth response of plants to such stimuli was termed thigmomorphogenesis and was observed in a wide range of plants.^1–3 The most common thigmomorphogenetic response is a retardation of tissue elongation accompanied by an increase in thickness.⁴ The plant response to mechanical perturbation is mainly restricted to the young developing internode, since no influence can be detected when the internode has reached its final length.^5,6 These plant growth modifications, which characterize thigmomorphogenesis, are related to biochemical events associated with lignification process⁷ and ethylene production.^8,9In tomato plant the length of internodes 4 (N4) and 5 (N5) was measured 14 days after rubbing of the fourth internode. Results reported in Figure 1 show that rubbing led to a significant reduction of elongation of the stressed internode (N4) (decrease of N4 length from 4.3 cm in the control plant to 2.9 in the rubbed one). This effect was not limited to the rubbed area but affected also the elongation of the neighboring internodes (N5) that were shorter in rubbed plants than in control ones.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Internode lengths of control and rubbed plants measured 14 day after mechanical stress applied to the fourth internode. Standard errors are indicated by vertical bars.Results reported in Figure 2 show an increase in PAL activity in both internodes N4 and N5, 24 hours after mechanical stress application as compared with corresponding controls. CAD activity was also investigated in N4 and N5, 24 h after rubbing of the fourth internode. Results presented in Figure 3 show that mechanical stress application induces a strong increase of CAD activity in the rubbed internode N4 (5.3 nkatal μg-1 protein) with an approximately two-fold increase when compared to control tomato internodes (2.3 nkatal μg-1 protein). Further, CAD activity in N5 was also increased in the rubbed internode (5.538 nkatal μg-1 protein) as compared with the control one (3.256 nkatal μg-1 protein).Open in a separate windowFigure 2PAL activity of internode 4, and 5 in control and rubbed plants 24 h after rubbing of the fourth internode. Standard errors are indicated by vertical bars.Open in a separate windowFigure 3CAD activity of internode 4, and 5 in control and rubbed plants 24 h after rubbing of the fourth internode. Standard errors are indicated by vertical bars.Syringaldazine (S-POD) and gaïacol (G-POD) peroxidase activities were measured in tomato N4 and N5. Results reported in Figure 4 show an increase in soluble peroxidase activity with both substrates in the rubbed internode N4 as compared with control plant. Enhancement in peroxidase activities in N4 was more pronounced with gaïacol (80.7 U) as an electron donor than syringaldazine (33.8 U). Similar results were observed in internode 5 as compared with control one (Fig. 4).Open in a separate windowFigure 4(A) Syringaldazine-POD (Syr-POD) activity of internode 4 and 5 in control and rubbed plants 24 h after rubbing of the fourth internode. Standard errors are indicated by vertical bars. (B) Gaiacol-POD (G-POD) activity of internode 4 and 5 in control and rubbed plants 24 h after rubbing of the fourth internode. Standard errors are indicated by vertical bars.IAA was quantified in control and rubbed plant internodes 24 h after rubbing of the fourth internode. Results reported in figure 5 show that in control sample and as expected, the content of IAA was found to be higher in the younger internode (N5) as compared to the older one (N4). Rubbing led to a significant decrease in IAA levels in N4 (5.06 nmol g⁻¹ MF⁻¹) as compared with corresponding controls (7.27 nmol g⁻¹ MF⁻¹). Similar results were observed in internode 5, where IAA content was reduced from 16.52 nmol g⁻¹ MF⁻¹ in control internode to 12.35 nmol g⁻¹ MF⁻¹ in the rubbed internode (Fig. 5).Open in a separate windowFigure 5IAA Level of internode 4 and 5 in control and rubbed plants 24 h after rubbing of the fourth internode. Standard errors are indicated by vertical bars.The results reported here establish an evident correlation between growth limitation of the rubbed internode and their degree of lignification, the increase in lignification enzymes activities and auxin degradation after mechanical stress application.Auxin seems to be involved in thigmomorphogenesis.¹⁰ It was proposed that MIS (Mechanically-induced stress) has opposite effects on auxin levels in the two species studied to date, Phaseolus vulgaris¹⁰ and Bryonia dioica.^11,12 Auxin level as measured by bioassay, increased in Phaseolus vulgaris following rubbing of the stem.¹⁰ It was proposed that a build up of auxin may result from the reduced polar transport of IAA at the rubbed internode, causing a build up of IAA in the stem tissue. Exogenous IAA did not reverse the MIS inhibition of growth in Phaseolus vulgaris and high levels of IAA retarded growth in non-stressed plants.¹⁰ Thus, retardation of extension growth in Phaseolus vulgaris may have been caused by high levels of endogenous auxin and the increase in stem diameter by increased ethylene production.⁴ However, ethylene increases radial growth only if auxin is present.¹³Boyer¹¹ reported a decrease in auxinlike activity in Bryonia dioica following MIS and this was confirmed in the same species by Hofinger et al.¹² who reported a decrease in IAA using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Auxin catabolism was accompanied with changes in both soluble and ionically bound cell wall basic peroxidases¹⁴ and the appearance of an additional peroxidase. This can suggest that in Bryonia, auxin catabolism is hastened by mechanical stimulated peroxidase. In addition, Boyer et al.¹⁵ reported that lithium pre-treatment prevents both thigmomorphogenesis and appearance of specific cathodic isoperoxidase in Bryonia plants subjected to MIS. This is give further credence to the possibility that the peroxidase-auxin system is involved in Bryonia thigmomorphogenesis. In addition, ethylene increases peroxidase activity which reduces the auxin content in the tissue to a level low enough not to support normal growth. We have evidence that decrease of auxin level contribute to mechanism leading to tomato internode inhibition subjected to mechanical stress.Growth inhibition has been suggested to be the result of tissues lignification.⁶ As the initial enzyme in the monolignol biosynthesis pathway, PAL has a direct influence on lignin accumulation.¹⁶ The characteristics of lignin differ among cell wall tissues and plant organs.¹⁷ It comprises polyphenolic polymers derived from the oxidative polymerization of different monolignols, including p-coumaryl, coniferyl and sinapyl alcohols via a side pathway of phenylalanine metabolism leading to lignin synthesis.¹⁸ The increase in lignin content in the rubbed tomato internode could be a response mechanism to mechanical damage caused by rubbing.³ It is known that plants create a natural barrier that includes lignin and suberin synthesis, components directly linked to support systems.^19,20The increase in lignin content of rubbed tomato internode³ is paralleled by a rise in CAD activity and whilst such direct proportionality between CAD activity and lignin accumulation does not always agree with the results in the literature, it clearly is responding in ways similar to those of the other enzymes in the pathway.²¹Mechanical stress-induced membrane depolarization would generate different species of free radicals and peroxides, which in turn initiate lipid peroxidation.²² The degradation of cell membranes is suggested to bring about rapid changes in ionic flux, especially release of K⁺ which would result in an enhanced endogenous Ca/K ratio and in leakage of solutes, among them electron donors such as ascorbic acid and phenolic substances. The increased intracellular relative calcium level activated secretion of basic peroxidases²³ into the free space where, in association with the electron donors and may be with the circulating IAA, they eliminate the peroxides, and facilitated binding of basic peroxidases to membrane structures allowing a role as 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC)-oxidases. The resulting IAA and ACC oxidase-mediated changes in ethylene production²⁴ would further induce (this time through the protein synthesis machinery) an increase in activity of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase and peroxidases. The resulting lignification and cell wall rigidification determines the growth response of tomato internode to the mechanical stress.     

Arabinogalactan proteins (AGPs) related to pollen tube guidance into the embryo sac in Arabidopsis

Some AGP molecules or their sugar moieties are probably related to the guidance of the pollen tube into the embryo sac, in the final part of its pathway, when arriving at the ovules. The specific labelling of the synergid cells and its filiform apparatus, which are the cells responsible for pollen tube attraction, and also the specific labelling of the micropyle and micropylar nucellus, which constitutes the pollen tube entryway into the embryo sac, are quite indicative of this role. We also discuss the possibility that AGPs in the sperm cells are probably involved in the double fertilization process.Key words: Arabidopsis, arabinogalactan proteins, AGP 6, gametic cells, pollen tube guidanceThe selective labelling obtained by us with monoclonal antibodies directed to the glycosidic parts of AGPs, in Arabidopsis and in other plant species, namely Amaranthus hypochondriacus,¹ Actinidia deliciosa² and Catharanthus roseus, shows that some AGP molecules or their sugar moieties are probably related to the guidance of the pollen tube into the embryo sac, in the final part of its pathway, when arriving at the ovules. The evaluation of the selective labelling obtained with AGP-specific monoclonal antibodies (Mabs) JIM 8, JIM 13, MAC 207 and LM 2, during Arabidopsis pollen development, led us to postulate that some AGPs, in particular those with sugar epitopes identified by JIM 8 and JIM 13, can be classified as molecular markers for generative cell differentiation and development into male gametes.Likewise, we also postulated that the AGP epitopes recognized by Mabs JIM 8 and JIM 13 are also molecular markers for the development of the embryo sac in Arabidopsis thaliana. Moreover, these AGP epitopes are also present along the pollen tube pathway, predominantly in its last stage, the micropyle, which constitutes the region of the ovule in the immediate vicinity of the pollen tube target, the embryo sac.³We have recently shown the expression of AGP genes in Arabidopsis pollen grains and pollen tubes and also the presence of AGPs along Arabidopsis pollen tube cell surface and tip region, as opposed to what had been reported earlier. We have also shown that only a subset of AGP genes is expressed in pollen grain and pollen tubes, with prevalence for Agp6 and Agp11, suggesting a specific and defined role for some AGPs in Arabidopsis sexual reproduction (Pereira et al., 2006).⁴Therefore we continued by using an Arabidopsis line expressing GFP under the command of the Agp6 gene promoter sequence. These plants were studied under a low-power binocular fluorescence microscope. GFP labelling was only observed in haploid cells, pollen grains (Fig. 1) and pollen tubes (Fig. 2); all other tissues clearly showed no labelling. These observations confirmed the specific expression of Agp6 in pollen grains and pollen tubes. As shown in the Figures 1 and ​and2,2, the labelling with GFP is present in all pollen tube extension, so probably, AGP 6 is not one of the AGPs identified by JIM 8 and JIM 13, otherwise GFP light emission would localize more specifically in the sperm cells.⁵ So we think that MAC 207 which labels the entire pollen tube wall (Fig. 3) may indeed be recognizing AGP6, which seems to be expressed in the vegetative cell. In other words, the specific labelling obtained for the generative cell and for the two male gametes, is probably given by AGPs that are present in very low quantities, apparently not the case for AGP 6 or AGP 11.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Low-power binocular fluorescence microscope image of an Arabidopsis flower with the AGP 6 promoter:GFP construct. The labelling is evident in pollen grains that are being released and in others that are already in the stigma papillae.Open in a separate windowFigure 2Low-power binocular fluorescence microscope image of an Arabidopsis ovary with the AGP6 promoter:GFP construct. The ovary was partially opened to show the pollen tubes growing in the septum, and into the ovules. The pollen tubes are also labelled by GFP.Open in a separate windowFigure 3Imunofluorescence image of a pollen tube growing in vitro, and labeled by MAC 207 monoclonal antibody. The labelling is evident all over the pollen tube wall.After targeting an ovule, the pollen tube growth arrests inside a synergid cell and bursts, releasing the two sperm cells. It has recently been shown that sperm cells, for long considered to be passive cargo, are involved in directing the pollen tube to its target. In Arabidopsis, HAP2 is expressed only in the haploid sperm and is required for efficient pollen tube guidance to the ovules.⁶ The same could be happening with the AGPs identified in the sperm cells by JIM 8 and JIM 13. We are now working on tagging these AGPs and using transgenic plants aiming to answer to such questions.Pollen tube guidance in the ovary has been shown to be in the control of signals produced by the embryo sac. When pollen tubes enter ovules bearing feronia or sirene mutations (the embryo sac is mutated), they do not stop growing and do not burst. In Zea mays a pollen tube attractant was recently identified in the egg apparatus and synergids.⁷ Chimeric ZmEA1 fused to green fluorescent protein (ZmEA1:GFP) was first visible within the filiform apparatus and later was localized to nucellar cell walls below the micropylar opening of the ovule. This is the same type of labelling that we have shown in Arabidopsis ovules, using Mabs JIM 8 and JIM 13. We are now involved in the identification of the specific AGPs associated with the labellings that we have been showing.     

Nitric oxide functions in both methyl jasmonate signaling and abscisic acid signaling in Arabidopsis guard cells

Intracellular components in methyl jasmonate (MeJA) signaling remain largely unknown, to compare those in well-understood abscisic acid (ABA) signaling. We have reported that nitric oxide (NO) is a signaling component in MeJA-induced stomatal closure, as well as ABA-induced stomatal closure in the previous study. To gain further information about the role of NO in the guard cell signaling, NO production was examined in an ABA- and MeJA-insensitive Arabidopsis mutant, rcn1. Neither MeJA nor ABA induced NO production in rcn1 guard cells. Our data suggest that NO functions downstream of the branch point of MeJA and ABA signaling in Arabidopsis guard cells.Key words: abscisic acid, Arabidopsis thaliana, guard cells, methyl jasmonate, nitric oxideStomatal pores that are formed by pairs of guard cells respond to various environmental stimuli including plant hormones. Some signal components commonly function in MeJA- and ABA-induced stomatal closing signals,¹ such as cytosolic alkalization, ROS generation and cytosolic free calcium ion elevation. Recently, we demonstrated that NO functions in MeJA signaling, as well as ABA signaling in guard cells.²NO production by nitric oxide synthase (NOS) and nitrate reductase (NR) plays important roles in physiological processes in plants.^3,4 It has been shown that NO functions downstream of ROS production in ABA signaling in guard cells.⁵ NO mediates elevation of cytosolic free Ca²⁺ concentration ([Ca²⁺]_cyt), inactivation of inward-rectifying K⁺ channels and activation of S-type anion channels,⁶ which are known to be key factors in MeJA- and ABA-induced stomatal closure.^2,7–9It has been reported that ROS was not induced by MeJA and ABA in the MeJA- and ABA-insensitive mutant, rcn1 in which the regulatory subunit A of protein phosphatase 2A, RCN1, is impaired.^7,10 We examined NO production induced by MeJA and ABA in rcn1 guard cells (Fig. 1). NO production by MeJA and ABA was impaired in rcn1 mutant (p = 0.87 and 0.25 for MeJA and ABA, respectively) in contrast to wild type. On the other hand, the NO donor, SNP induced stomatal closure both in wild type and rcn1 mutant (data not shown). These results are consistent with our previous results, i.e., NO is involved in both MeJA- and ABA-induced stomatal closure and functions downstream of the branching point of MeJA and ABA signaling in Arabidopsis guard cells.⁷ Our finding implies that protein phosphatase 2A might positively regulate NO levels in guard cells (Fig. 2).Open in a separate windowFigure 1Impairment of MeJA- and ABA-induced NO production in rcn1 guard cells. (A) Effects of MeJA (n = 10) and ABA (n = 9) on NO production in wild-type guard cells. (B) Effects of MeJA (n = 7) and ABA (n = 7) on NO production in rcn1 guard cells. The vertical scale represents the percentage of diaminofluorescein-2 diacetate (DAF-2 DA) fluorescent levels when fluorescent intensities of MeJA- or ABA-treated cells are normalized to control value taken as 100% for each experiment. Each datum was obtained from at least 30 guard cells. Error bars represent standard errors. Significance of differences between data sets was assessed by Student''s t-test analysis in this paper. We regarded differences at the level of p < 0.05 as significant.Open in a separate windowFigure 2A model of signal interaction in MeJA-induced and ABA-induced stomatal closure. Neither MeJA nor ABA induces ROS production, NO production, I_Kin and stomatal closure in rcn1 mutant. These results suggest that NO functions downstream of the branch point of MeJA signaling and ABA signaling in Arabidopsis guard cells.     

Biphasic ethylene production during the hypersensitive response in Arabidopsis: A window into defense priming mechanisms?

The hypersensitive response (HR) is a cell death phenomenon associated with localized resistance to pathogens. Biphasic patterns in the generation of H₂O₂, salicylic acid and ethylene have been observed in tobacco during the early stages of the HR. These biphasic models reflect an initial elicitation by pathogen-associated molecular patterns followed by a second phase, induced by pathogen-encoded avirulence gene products. The first phase has been proposed to potentiate the second, to increase the efficacy of plant resistance to disease. This potentiation is comparable to the “priming” of plant defenses which is seen when plants display systemic resistance to disease. The events regulating the generation of the biphasic wave, or priming, remains obscure, however recently we demonstrated a key role for nitric oxide in this process in a HR occurring in tobacco. Here we use laser photoacoustic detection to demonstrate that biphasic ethylene production also occurs during a HR occurring in Arabidopsis. We suggest that ethylene emanation during the HR represents a ready means of visualising biphasic events during the HR and that exploiting the genomic resources offered by this model species will facilitate the development of a mechanistic understanding of potentiating/priming processes.Key words: hypersensitive response, biphasic patterns, potentiation, defense priming, ethylene, ArabidopsisThe Hypersensitive Response (HR) is a cell death process which occurs at the site of attempted pathogen attack and which has been associated with host resistance.¹ Much work on the regulation of the HR has indicated the importance of H₂O₂,² and NO.³ A feature of H₂O₂ generation during the HR is its biphasic pattern (Fig. 1A). The first rise reflects elicitation by pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs)⁴ and the second reflects the interaction between a pathogen-encoded avirulence (avr) gene product with a plant resistance (R) gene. A key aspect of the first rise is the initiation of salicylic acid (SA) synthesis which potentiates the second rise and hence the potency of plant defense and the HR.⁵Open in a separate windowFigure 1Patterns of defense signal generation during the Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola elicited-hypersensitive response in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum). Generation of (A) H₂O₂ (●, Mur¹⁸); (B) nitric oxide (◇; Mur¹² (C) salicylic acid (SA, ■¹⁹) and (D) ethylene (○ Mur⁹) during a HR elicited by Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola (Psph) in tobacco cv. Samsun NN. In (A) a phase where SA acts to augment the second rise in H₂O₂—the potentiation phase—is highlighted. The potentiation phase is likely to be similar to defense “priming”.⁶ Methodological details are contained within the appropriate references. (E) A possible model for biphasic defense signal regulation during the Psph-elicited HR in tobacco. During an initial phase NO and H₂O₂ act to initiate SA biosynthesis, where SA and NO act to initiate a “H₂O₂ biphasic switch”. This could initially suppress both SA and the H₂O₂ generation but subsequently acts to potentiate a second phase of H₂O₂ generation. This in turn increases SA biosynthesis which could act with NO to initiate the “C₂H₄ biphasic switch” to potentiate ethylene production. These (and other) signals contribute to initiation of the HR and SAR.This potentiation mechanism appears to be similar to defense priming; when whole plants display systemic resistance to disease as opposed to a localized resistance against pathogens. Priming can be initiated (the “primary stimulus”) following attack with a necrotizing pathogen (leading to “systemic acquired resistance”, SAR) or non-pathogenic rhizosphere bacteria (to confer “induced systemic resistance”, ISR). In the primed state a plant stimulates a range of plant defense genes, produces anti-microbial phytoalexins and deposits cell wall strengthening molecules, but only on imposition of a “secondary stimulus”.⁶ Such secondary stimuli include SA³ or PAMPs⁷ and is likely to be mechanistically similar to the potentiation step in the biphasic pattern of H₂O₂ generation (shaded in Fig. 1A). Accordingly, the two phases in the biphasic wave represent primary and secondary stimuli in priming.Highlighting a similarity between local HR-based events and priming, adds further impetus to efforts aiming to describe the underlying mechanism(s), however both phenomena remain poorly understood. Besides SA, both jasmonates and abscisic acid (ABA) have been shown to prime defenses as have a range of non-plant chemicals, with β-aminobutyric acid (BABA) being perhaps most widely used.^6,8 Mutants which fail to exhibit BABA-mediated potentiation were defective in either a cyclin-dependent kinase-like protein, a polyphosphoinositide phosphatase or an ABA biosynthetic enzyme.⁸We have recently investigated biphasic ethylene production during the HR in tobacco elicited by the nonhost HR-eliciting bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola.⁹ As with H₂O₂ generation, this pattern reflected PAMP-and AVR-dependent elicitation events and included a SA-mediated potentiation stage. Crucially, we also showed that NO was a vital component in the SA-potentiation mechanism. When this finding is integrated with our other measurements of defense signal generation in the same host-pathogen system the complexity in the signaling network is revealed (Fig. 1). NO generation (Fig. 1B) appeared to be coincident with the first rise in H₂O₂ (Fig. 1A) which initiated SA biosynthesis^10,11 and together would contribute to the first small, but transient, rise in that hormone (Fig. 1C). In line with established models⁵ this momentary rise in SA coincides with the potentiation phase (shaded in Fig. 1A) required to augment the second rise in ROS. However, ethylene production seems to be correlated poorly with the patterns of NO, H₂O₂ and SA (Fig. 1D). Nevertheless, biphasic ethylene production was found to reflect PAMP and AVR-dependent recognition and included a SA-mediated potentiation step.⁹ Hence, ethylene production could be used as a post-hoc indicator of the potentiation mechanism. Therefore, our discovery that the second wave of ethylene production—a “biphasic switch”—is influenced by NO acting with SA could also be relevant to the H₂O₂ generation. Significantly, the second phases in both H₂O₂ and ethylene production occur exactly where SA and NO production coincides; in the case of H₂O₂ generation 2–4 h post challenge and with ethylene 6 h onwards (Fig. 1E).Thus, ethylene production represents a readily assayable marker to indicate perturbations in the underlying biphasic and possible priming mechanisms. As we have demonstrated, laser photoacoustic detection (LAPD) is a powerful on-line approach to determine in planta ethylene production in tobacco^9,12 but any mechanistic investigations would be greatly facilitated if the genetic resources offered by the model species Arabidopsis could be exploited.To address this, Arabidopsis Col-0 rosettes were vacuum infiltrated with either Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Pst) avrRpm1 (HR-eliciting), the virulent Pst strain and the non-HR eliciting and non-virulent Pst hrpA strain. Ethylene production was monitored by LAPD (Fig. 2A). Significantly, Pst avrRpm1 initiated a biphasic pattern of ethylene production whose kinetics were very similar to that seen in tobacco (compare Figs. 2A with ​with1D).1D). Inoculations with Pst and Pst hrpA only displayed the first PAMP-dependent rise in ethylene production. Thus, these data establish that Arabidopsis can be used to investigate biphasic switch mechanism(s) in ethylene production during the HR and possibly defense priming. When considering such mechanisms, it is relevant to highlight the work of Foschi et al.¹³ who observed that biphasic activation of a monomeric G protein to cause phase-specific activation of different kinase cascades. Interestingly, ethylene has been noted to initiate biphasic activation of G proteins and kinases in Arabidopsis, although differing in kinetics to the phases seen during the HR.¹⁴ Further, plant defense priming has been associated with the increased accumulation of MAP kinase protein.⁶Open in a separate windowFigure 2Ethylene in the Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato elicited-hypersensitive response in Arabidopsis thaliana. (A) Ethylene production from 5 week old short day (8 h light 100 µmol.m².sec⁻¹) grown Arabidopsis rosette leaves which were vacuum infiltrated with bacterial suspensions (2 × 10⁶ colony forming units.ml⁻¹) of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Pst) strains detected using laser photoacoustic detection (LAPD). Experimental details of the ethylene detection by LAPD are detailed in Mur et al.⁹ The intercellular spaces in leaves were infiltrated with the HR-eliciting strain Pst avrRpm1, (■), the virulent strain Pst (△) or the non-virulent and non-HR eliciting derivative, Pst hrpA (◇). (B) The appearance of Arabidopsis Col-0 and etr1-1 leaves at various h following injection with 2 × 10⁶ c.f.u.mL⁻¹ with of Pst avrRpm1. (C) Explants (1 cm diameter discs) from Arabidopsis leaf areas infiltrated with suspensions of Pst avrRpm1 were placed in a 1.5 cm diameter well, bathed in 1 mL de-ionized H₂O. Changes in the conductivity of the bathing solution, as an indicator of electrolyte leakage from either wild type Col-0 (◆), mutants which were compromised in ethylene signaling; etr1-1 (□), ein2-2 (▲) or which overproduced ethylene; eto2-1 (●) were measured using a conductivity meter. Methodological details are set out in Mur et al.⁹A further point requires consideration; the role of ethylene as a direct contributor to plant defense.¹⁵ The contribution of ethylene to the HR has been disputed,¹⁶ but in tobacco we have observed that altered ethylene production influenced the formation of a P. syringae pv. phaseolicola elicited HR.⁹ In Arabidopsis, cell death in the ethylene receptor mutant etr1-1 following inoculation with Pst avrRpm1 is delayed compared to wild type (Fig. 2B). When electrolyte leakage was used to quantify Pst avrRpm1 cell death, both etr1-1 and the ethylene insensitive signaling mutant ein2-1 exhibited slower death than wild-type but in the ethylene overproducing mutant eto2, cell death was augmented (Fig. 2C). These data indicate that ethylene influences the kinetics of the HR.Taking these data together we suggest that the complexity of signal interaction during the HR or in SAR/ISR could be further dissected by combining the genetic resources of Arabidopsis with measurements of ethylene production using such sensitive approaches as LAPD.     

Localization of Superoxide in the Root Apex of Arabidopsis

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) fulfil many functions in plants. They have a signaling role in several physiological mechanisms, but they are also directly involved as substrates in important reactions, especially in the apoplast. Two ROS, superoxide and hydrogen peroxide, were shown to exhibit a typical accumulation pattern in the Arabidopsis root apex. While hydrogen peroxide is mainly present in the cell wall of fully elongated cells in the region of root hair formation, superoxide accumulation roughly coincides with the transition zone, between the meristem and the fast elongating zone. Developing lateral roots also exhibit a strong superoxide labeling with the same localization.Key Words: superoxide, hydrogen peroxide, cell elongation, transition zone, nitroblue tetrazoliumIn a recent work,¹ we have shown that superoxide radical and hydrogen peroxide have different accumulation sites in Arabidopsis root tip. Hydrogen peroxide is mainly present in a region identified as “differentiation zone”, according to the nomenclature used by Scheres et al.² This localization fits well with the role that was assigned to this ROS in the formation of root hairs.³ This hypothesis was strengthened by the fact that umbelliferone, which promotes the in vitro and in vivo formation of hydrogen peroxide by peroxidases, induces the formation and the elongation of root hairs. In contrast, potassium iodide, a H₂O₂ scavenger, prevents the formation of root hairs, but does not completely abolished their initiation.As for superoxide radical, it accumulates mainly in apoplast of cells ranging from the proximal part of root meristem to the point where cells initiate their fast elongation. This localization is in agreement with a role of superoxide in the cell elongation process.¹ This conclusion can be refined, taking into account the work of Baluška and coll.^4,5 Using various functional and structural criteria, these authors identified four distinct zones in the root apex of Arabidopsis. They introduced an additional zone, between the meristem and the fast elongating cells, named “transition zone”. This region comprises cells which do not divide any more and are preparing their elongation. A reappraisal of the localization of superoxide accumulation in the light of this classification could suggest that this ROS is actually mainly associated with this transition zone, rather than with the beginning of the elongation zone. Figure 1 shows an Arabidopsis root stained for the presence of superoxide with nitroblue tetrazolium. It appears that the strong superoxide staining ranges from about 80 to 250 µm away from the root tip. The respective sizes of the various zones somewhat differ from the sizes reported (in ref. ⁵). It is difficult to precisely determine the border between the meristem and the transition zone, which should be around 120 µm. The fast elongation zone begins at about 240 µm. Fast elongating cells exhibit only a slight superoxide staining in their cell wall. Therefore, it appears that superoxide accumulates mainly in the wall of cells preparing their rapid elongation. It has been reported that cells in the transition zone undergo several modifications to prepare their growth. This includes reactions leading to cell wall loosening.^6,7 The presence of superoxide in the cell wall of those cells could participate in the onset of the loosening process, for example by interacting with peroxidases to produce hydroxyl radicals.⁸Open in a separate windowFigure 1Distribution of superoxide radical in the root of a 7-day old Arabidopsis seedling stained with nitroblue tetrazolium. Growth conditions and staining procedure were as described (in ref. ¹). The scale indicates µm, starting from the root cap junction. The picture was taken with a MZ 16 Leica stereomicroscope. Arrowheads point to root hairs in formation. Black arrow, basal limit of meristem. White arrow, onset of the fast elongation zone.When roots get older, the intensity of superoxide staining in the main root tip decreases, while the apex of the newly formed lateral roots exhibits a stronger reaction (Fig. 2). This could be related to the important growth potential of young lateral roots. The emerging root primordium is usually clearly positive (Fig. 2A) and in a fully formed lateral root, superoxide staining is concentrated in a zone between the meristem and elongated cells, most likely corresponding to the transition zone (Fig. 2B). In conclusion, superoxide radical seems to accumulate in the wall of cells preparing their elongation in the transition zone of Arabidopsis root apex.Open in a separate windowFigure 2Detection of superoxide radical by nitroblue tetrazolium in a lateral root primordium marked by an arrow (A) and in a developing lateral root (B). mr, main root. Scale bar: 100 µm.     

Actin bundling via LIM domains

The LIM domain is defined as a protein-protein interaction module involved in the regulation of diverse cellular processes including gene expression and cytoskeleton organization. We have recently shown that the tobacco WLIM1, a two LIM domain-containing protein, is able to bind to, stabilize and bundle actin filaments, suggesting that it participates to the regulation of actin cytoskeleton structure and dynamics. In the December issue of the Journal of Biological Chemistry we report a domain analysis that specifically ascribes the actin-related activities of WLIM1 to its two LIM domains. Results suggest that LIM domains function synergistically in the full-length protein to achieve optimal activities. Here we briefly summarize relevant data regarding the actin-related properties/functions of two LIM domain-containing proteins in plants and animals. In addition, we provide further evidence of cooperative effects between LIM domains by transiently expressing a chimeric multicopy WLIM1 protein in BY2 cells.Key words: Actin-binding proteins, actin-bundling, cysteine-rich proteins, cytoskeleton, LIM domainThe LIM domain is a ≈55 amino acid peptide domain that was first identified in 1990 as a common cystein-rich sequence found in the three homeodomain proteins LIN-11, Isl1 and MEC-3. It has since been found in a wide variety of eukaryotic proteins of diverse functions. Animals possess several families of LIM proteins, with members containing 1–5 LIM domains occasionally linked to other catalytic or protein-binding domains such as homeodomain, kinase and SH3 domains. In contrast, plants only possess two distinct sets of LIM proteins. One is plant-specific and has not been functionally characterized yet. The other one comprises proteins that exhibit the same overall structure as the animal cystein rich proteins (CRPs), i.e., two very similar LIM domains separated by a ≈50 amino acid-long interLIM domain and a relatively short and variable C-terminal domain (Fig. 1A). The mouse CRP2 protein was the first CRP reported to interact directly with actin filaments (AF) and to stabilize the latter.¹ Identical observations were subsequently described for the chicken CRP1 and tobacco WLIM1 proteins.^2,3 In addition, these two proteins were shown to arrange AF into cables both in vitro and in vivo and thus join the list of actin bundlers.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Domain maps for wild-type WLIM1 (A) and GFP-fused chimeric 3xWLIM1 (B). A. WLIM1 basically comprises a short N-terminal domain (Nt), two LIM domains (LIM1 and LIM2), an interLIM spacer (IL) and a C-terminal domain (Ct). B. 3xWLIM1 consists of three tandem WLIM1 copies. This chimeric protein has been fused in C-terminus to GFP and transiently expressed in tobacco BY2 cells.To identify the peptide domains of WLIM1 responsible for its actin-related properties/activities, we generated domain-deleted and single domain variants and submitted them to a series of in vivo and in vitro assays.⁴ Localization experiments established that both LIM domains are required to efficiently target the actin cytoskeleton in tobacco BY2 cells. High-speed (200,000 g) cosedimentation data confirmed that the actin-binding activity of WLIM1 relies on its LIM domains. Indeed, the deletion of either the first or the second LIM domain respectively resulted in a 5-fold and 10-fold decrease of the protein affinity for AF. Importantly, each single LIM domain was found able to interact with AF in an autonomous manner, although with a reduced affinity compared to the wild-type WLIM1. Low-speed (12,500 g) cosedimentation data and electron microscopy observations revealed that the actin bundling activity of WLIM1 is also triggered by its LIM domains. Surprisingly each single LIM domain was able to bundle AF in an autonomous manner, suggesting that WLIM1 has two discrete actin-bundling sites. However, the bundles induced by the variants containing only one LIM domain, i.e., LIM domain-deleted mutants and single LIM domains, differed from those induced by the full-length WLIM1. They appeared more wavy and loosely packed and formed only at relatively high protein:actin ratios. Together these data suggest that LIM domains are autonomous actin-binding and -bundling modules that function in synergy in wild-type WLIM1 to achieve optimal activities.To further assess the mechanism of cooperation between the LIM domains of plant CRP-related proteins, we generated a chimeric protein composed of three WLIM1 copies in tandem (3 × WLIM1, Fig. 1B), and transiently expressed it as a GFP-fusion in tobacco BY2 cells. We anticipated that such a six LIM domain-containing protein displays an even higher actin-bundling activity. (Fig. 2A) shows the typical actin cytoskeleton pattern in an expanding BY2 cell as visualized using the actin marker GFP-fABD2.⁵ As previously reported by Sheahan et al.,⁵ GFP-fABD2 decorated dense, transversely oriented, cortical networks as well as transvacuolar strands connecting the subcortical-perinuclear region to the cortex. Ectopic expression of WLIM1-GFP (BY2 cells normally do not express the WLIM1 gene) induced moderate but perceptible modifications of the actin cytoskeleton structure (Fig. 2B). Most AF are arranged in bundles thicker than those observed in GFP-fABD2 expressing cells and fine AF arrays are less frequently observed. As expected, this phenotype was significantly enhanced in cells transformed with the 3xWLIM1-GFP protein (Fig. 2C). Indeed, cells were almost devoided of fine AF arrays and exhibited very thick actin cables (Fig. 2C) that, at times (≈30 %), form atypical long looped structures (Fig. 2D). The appearance of such structures may result from the increase of cable stability and thickness induced by the 3xWLIM1-GFP protein, as these parameters are likely to determine, at least partially, the maximal length of actin bundles. Together the present observations support earlier data showing that LIM domains work in concert in LIM proteins to regulate actin bundling in plant cells. Strikingly, vertebrate and plant CRPs invariably contain two LIM domains. The lack, in these organisms, of CRP-related proteins combining more than two LIM domains may be explained by the fact that very thick cables, such as those induced by the artificial 3xWLIM1, may be too stable structures incompatible with the necessary high degree of actin cytoskeleton plasticity. As an exception, a muscle CRP-related protein with five LIM domains (Mlp84B) has been identified in Drosophila.⁶ However, rather than decorating actin filaments in an homogenous manner, this protein has been found to concentrate in a specialized region of the Z-discs where it stabilizes, in concert with D-titin, muscle sarcomeres.⁷Open in a separate windowFigure 2Typical actin cytoskeleton patterns in tobacco BY2 cells that have been transiently transformed, using a particle gun, with GFP-fABD2 (A), WLIM1-GFP (B), and 3xWLIM1-GFP (C and D). For each construct, more than 60 cells were analyzed by confocal microscopy. In the case of 3xWLIM1-GFP, two prevalent patterns have been observed (C and D). Bars = 20 µm.The relatively well conserved spacer length (≈50 amino acids) that separates the two LIM domains in vertebrate CRPs and related plant LIM proteins remains an intriguing feature the importance of which in actin cable organization remains to be established. Using electron microscopy we are currently evaluating the effects of the modification of the interLIM domain length on the structural properties of actin cables.     

ERECTA controls low light intensity-induced differential petiole growth independent of phytochrome B and cryptochrome 2 action in Arabidopsis thaliana

Plants can respond quickly and profoundly to changes in their environment. Several species, including Arabidopsis thaliana, are capable of differential petiole growth driven upward leaf movement (hyponastic growth) to escape from detrimental environmental conditions. Recently, we demonstrated that the leucine-rich repeat receptor-like Ser/Thr kinase gene ERECTA, explains a major effect Quantitative Trait Locus (QTL) for ethylene-induced hyponastic growth in Arabidopsis. Here, we demonstrate that ERECTA controls the hyponastic growth response to low light intensity treatment in a genetic background dependent manner. Moreover, we show that ERECTA affects low light-induced hyponastic growth independent of Phytochrome B and Cryptochrome 2 signaling, despite that these photoreceptors are positive regulators of low light-induced hyponastic growth.Key words: hyponastic growth, petiole, Arabidopsis, low light, ERECTA, differential growth, phytochrome B, cryptochrome 2Plants must adjust growth and reproduction to adverse environmental conditions. Among the strategies that plants employ to escape from unfavorable conditions is differential petiole growth-driven upward leaf movement, called hyponastic growth. Arabidopsis thaliana is able to exhibit a marked hyponastic response upon flooding, which is triggered by endogenous accumulation of the gaseous phytohormone ethylene.¹ Moreover, a similar response is triggered upon low light intensity perception and in response to supra-optimal temperatures.^2–5 By tilting the leaves to a more vertical position during submergence and shading, the plants restore contact with the atmosphere and light, respectively. The kinetics of the hyponastic growth response induced by the various stimuli is remarkably similar. This led to the hypothesis that shared functional genetic components may be employed to control hyponastic growth. Yet, at least part of the signaling cascades is parallel, as the hormonal control of the response differs between the stimuli. Low light-induced hyponastic growth for example does not require ethylene action.² Whereas the response to heat is antagonized by this hormone.⁵ The abiotic stress hormone abscisic acid (ABA) antagonizes ethylene-induced hyponastic growth and stimulates heat-induced hyponastic growth.^5,6 Moreover, ethylene-induced hyponasty does not involve auxin action⁷ whereas both heat- and low light-induced hyponasty require functional auxin signaling and transport components.^2,5In our recent paper, published in The Plant Journal,⁸ we employed Quantitative Trait Locus (QTL) analysis to identify loci involved in the control of ethylene-induced hyponastic petiole growth. By analyzing induced mutants and by complementation analysis of naturally occurring mutant accessions, we found that the leucine-rich repeat receptor-like Ser/Thr kinase gene ERECTA (ER) is a positive regulator of ethylene-induced hyponastic growth and most likely is causal to one of the identified QTLs. In addition, we demonstrated that the ER dependency is not via ER mediated control of ethylene production or sensitivity.Since low light-induced hyponasty does not require ethylene action,² ER may be part of the proposed shared signaling cascade leading to hyponastic growth where ethylene and low light signals meet. Therefore, we studied low light intensity-induced hyponasty in various erecta mutants. Moreover, natural occurring er mutant accessions complemented with a functional, Col-0 derived, ER allele were tested. The response of Lan-0 (Lan-0; with functional ER) to low light was indistinguishable from the response of Landsberg erecta (Ler) (Fig. 1A). However, complemented Ler (ER-Ler) showed an enhanced response compared to Ler (Fig. 1B). The response of mutant er105 was slightly attenuated compared to the wild type Columbia-0 (Fig. 1C). Mutant er104, however, showed an indistinguishable hyponastic growth phenotype to low light compared to the wild type Wassilewskija-2 (Ws-2) (Fig. 1D). Complementation of the natural occurring erecta mutant accession Vancouver-0 (Van-0) resulted in an enhanced hyponastic growth response to low light (Fig. 1E), whereas this was not the case for Hiroshima-1 (Hir-1) (Fig. 1F). Together, these data suggest that ER acts as positive regulator of low light-induced hyponastic growth and therefore may be part of the shared signaling cascade towards differential petiole growth. Yet, the effect is strongly dependent on the genetic background since the effects were not observed in every accession tested.Open in a separate windowFigure 1ERECTA involvement in low light-induced hyponasty. Effect of exposure to low light (spectral neutral reduction in light intensity from 200 to 20 µmol m⁻² s⁻¹) on the kinetics of hyponastic petiole growth in Arabidopsis thaliana. (A) mutant (circles) Ler and wild type (dashed line) Lan-0, (B) Ler and Ler complemented (ER-; squares) with the Col-0 ERECTA allele (ER-Ler), (C) er105 and Col-0 wild type, (D) er104 and Ws-2 wild type, (E) natural mutant Van-0 and Van-0 complemented with the Col-0 ER allele (ER-Van-0), (F) natural mutant Hir-1 and Hir-1 complemented with the Col-0 ER allele (ER-Hir-1). Petiole angles were measured using time-lapse photography and subsequent image analysis. Data is pairwise subtracted, which corrects for diurnal petiole movement in control conditions. For details on this procedure, growth conditions and materials, transformation protocol, treatments, data acquirement and all analyses see.^1,8 Error bars represent standard errors; n ≥ 12.Phytochrome B (PhyB) and Cryptochrome 2 (Cry2) photoreceptor proteins are required for a full induction of low light-induced hyponastic growth.² We transformed the phyb5 cry2 mutant9 (Ler genetic background) with Col-0 derived ER. This complementation did not restore the ability of phyb5 cry2 to induce hyponastic growth to neither ethylene (data not shown) nor low light conditions (Fig. 2A). Mutant phyb5 cry2 plants have a typical constitutive shade avoidance phenotype, reflected by severely elongated organs. This includes enhanced inflorescence and silique length and thin inflorescences (Fig. 2B-D). Complementation with ER resulted in a significant additional effect on these parameters (Fig. 2B-D). Together, this suggests that ER is not an integral part of PhyB nor Cry2 signaling with respect to (hyponastic) growth. Moreover, PhyB and Cry2 control of plant architecture does not require ER action. Rather, ER seems to mediate growth via genetic interaction with light-reliant growth mechanisms, instead of being downstream of photoreceptor action. Studies on the effects of ER on shade avoidance responses and various hormone responses, including cytokinin and auxin, led to the similar conclusion, suggesting a possible role for ER as a molecular hub coordinating light- and hormone-mediated plant growth.^10,11 One could speculate that ER fine-tunes other (than light) environmental clues with light signaling components. A comparable conclusion was drawn previously for gibberellin (GA) reliant growth mechanisms, as er enhanced the negative effect on plant size of the short internode (shi) mutation12 and er represses the positive effect of the spindly mutation in a GA independent manner.¹³Open in a separate windowFigure 2Effects of ERECTA on light signaling. (A) Effect of exposure to low light (spectral neutral reduction in light intensity from 200 to 20 µmol m⁻² s⁻¹) on the kinetics of hyponastic petiole growth of Ler (dashed lines), the photoreceptor double mutant phyb5 cry2 (circles) and this mutant complemented with the Col-0 ERECTA (ER-phyb cry2; squares). For details see legend Figure 1. (B) Plant height, (C) silique length and (D) inflorescence stem thickness of the above mentioned lines. These parameters were measured when the last flower on the plant developed a silique. Plant height was measured from root/shoot junction to inflorescence top. Stem thickness was measured ∼1 cm above the root/shoot junction with a caliper and silique lengths were measured from representative pedicels in the top ∼10 cm of the main inflorescence stem. Error bars represent standard errors; n ≥ 12. Significance levels; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ns = non significant, by Students t-test.     

Exo- and endocytotic trafficking of SCAMP2

Exo- and endocytotic membrane trafficking is an essential process for transport of secretory proteins, extracellular glycans, transporters and lipids in plant cells. Using secretory carrier membrane protein 2 (SCAMP2) as a marker for secretory vesicles and tobacco BY-2 cells as a model system, we recently demonstrated that SCAMP2 positive structures containing secretory materials are transported from the Golgi apparatus to the plasma membrane (PM) and/or cell plate. This structure is consisted with clustered vesicles and was thus named the secretory vesicle cluster (SVC). Here, we have utilized the reversible photoswitching fluorescent protein Dronpa1 to trace the movement of SCAMP2 on the PM and cell plate. Activated SCAMP2-Dronpa fluorescence on the PM and cell plate moved into the BY-2 cells within several minutes, but did not spread around PM. This is consistent with recycling of SCAMP2 among endomembrane compartments such as the TGN, PM and cell plate. The relationship between SVC-mediated trafficking and exo- and endocytosis of plant cells is discussed taking into account this new data and knowledge provided by recent reports.Key words: SVC, secretory vesicle cluster, secretory carrier membrane protein 2, SCAMP2, exocytosis, endocytosis, dronpa, trans-Golgi network, Golgi apparatus, pectin, secretory protein, plasma menbrane, endosome, endomembrane systemExo- and endocytosis are essential events for cellular division and expansion. During exocytosis, lipids, proteins and polysaccharides are synthesized and/or modified in the Golgi apparatus and sorted into secretory vesicles at the trans-Golgi network (TGN) for transport to the PM² or extracellular space. Secretory carrier membrane proteins (SCAMPs) are a group of transmembrane proteins that plays vesicle trafficking between Golgi apparatus and PM in higher eukaryotic cells.³ Recently it was reported that in BY-2 cells, the rice SCAMP1 is localized to the PM and clathrin-coated tubularvesicular structures that were likely the early endosomal compartment.⁴ The same protein is also targeted to the cell plate in dividing cells.⁵ We have recently reported that another member of the SCAMP family, SCAMP2 from tobacco, is localized to the TGN, PM, cell plate and previously uncharacterized SVC organelles, which are an intermediate organelle between the TGN and PM.⁶Both SCAMP1 and SCAMP2 appear to be recycled between the PM and intracellular compartments. This was suggested by data using stelyl dye FM4-64 as an endocytotic marker, fluorescent-tagged SCAMP proteins and protein trafficking inhibitors such as brefeldin A and 2,3-butanedione monoxime. We reported that SCAMP2 is exported to the PM from dotted structures in the cells, and back from the PM via the acto-myosin pathway but do not transport FM4-64 positive early endosome.⁶ As SCAMP2 did not localize on multivesicular bodies, endocytic vesicles may be directly transported to TGN or Golgi.⁶ However, this data was obtained using inhibitors that disrupt the trafficking system, and thus we have now investigated the endocytotic transport in the absence of inhibitors.Dronpa is a reversible photo-switching fluorescent protein. Using 488 and 405 nm laser light this protein can be converted between fluorescent and non-fluorescent forms within milliseconds.¹ In order to test whether SCAMP2 returned to internal compartments from the PM, and to characterize the initial compartment of endocytosis, we expressed Dronpatagged SCAMP2 (SCAMP2-Dronpa) in tobacco BY-2 cells. The fluorescence of SCAMP2-Dronpa was similar to that for SCAMP2-YFP and -mRFP fusions⁶ (Fig. 1A, upper part). To visualize the endocytic transport of SCAMP2-Dronpa, we first erased the majority of Dronpa fluorescence by illumination with 488 nm laser and then activated the protein at a part of the PM by 405 nm illumination using confocal laser scanning microscope (LSM) (Fig. 1A, upper right part). The fluorescence was then traced by 30 minutes interval up to 90 minutes (Fig. 1A, lower pictures). SCAMP2 signals at the PM did not spread laterally in the PM and decreased over the time. In parallel, signals were detected in the cytosol and some of them appeared as puncta (Fig. 1A, arrowheads). This observation is consistent with our proposal that SCAMP2 is recycled back into the intracellular compartment from the PM, possibly through the TGN without passing through the early endosome.⁶Open in a separate windowFigure 1Time-lapse images of BY-2 cells expressing ScamP2-Dronpa. Fluorescence of Dronpa (mBL) tagged ScamP2 in the cells was erased by 488 nm laser and then a spot of Pm (a) or cell plate (B) was activated by 405 nm diode laser. these data were obtained by LSm510 meta, 63x oil lens, Argon laser with 488-nm excitation and a 505 nm LP filter (Zeiss). Arrowheads indicate dotted structures. Bar = 20 μm.During cytokinesis, cell wall materials and membrane proteins accumulate in the cell plate.^7–9 It has been shown that clathrin-coated vesicles (CCVs) and their constituents such as adapter proteins and dynamins are associated with cell plate membrane.¹⁰ However, it is not clear whether these molecules on the cell plate are re-used in daughter cells or are degraded at the cell plate. We thus investigated the movement of SCAMP2-Dronpa fluorescence on the cell plate during cytokinesis. Fluorescence of SCAMP2-Dronpa within late metaphase cells was first erased, followed by activation of SCAMP2-Dronpa specifically on the cell plate (Fig. 1B). Following a 15 min of incubation, SCAMP2-Dronpa associated fluorescence on the cell plate moved into intracellular structures within daughter cells. This confirmed our previous observation that SCAMP2 was transported to the trans-Golgi/TGN or intracellular structures from the cell plate during the cytokinesis.⁶Transmission electron microscope and LSM studies have revealed that CCVs are present in cell plates.¹⁰ Recent tomographic observation suggested that early- and late TGNs having CCVs exist not only in the cell plate region but also other places of the plant cell.¹¹ We found that immature SVCs, which might be identical to late TGN, are converted to mature SVCs by budding CCVs.⁶ Therefore, transport from the Golgi apparatus located inside of the cells to the PM or cell plate is mediated by SVCs, which are generated as immature SVCs from the TGN and converted to mature SVCs by budding CCVs during transport. Eventually, the mature SVC fuses with the PM and/or expanding cell plate (Fig. 2, left), after which CCVs are generated from the expanded cell plate to recycle SCAMPs and other molecules back to the daughter cells.Open in a separate windowFigure 2A model of the exocytotic pathway and SCAMP2 trafficking in plant cells. From the Golgi apparatus or tGn, at least two distinct compartments, such as maSc and SVc are generated for secretion. ScamP2 locates in the SVc and is transported to the Pm or cell plate. thereafter, SCAMP2 is recycled back to the TGN via clathrin-mediated endocytosis.     

Splenogonadal Fusion: An Unusual Case of an Acute Scrotum

We highlight a case on a normal left testicle with a fibrovascular cord with three nodules consistent with splenic tissue. The torsed splenule demonstrated hemorrhage with neutrophilic infiltrate and thrombus consistent with chronic infarction and torsion. Splenogonadal fusion (SGF) is a rather rare entity, with approximately 184 cases reported in the literature. The most comprehensive review was that of 123 cases completed by Carragher in 1990. Since then, an additional 61 cases have been reported in the scientific literature. We have studied these 61 cases in detail and have included a summary of that information here.Key words: Splenogonadal fusion, Acute scrotumA 10-year-old boy presented with worsening left-sided scrotal pain of 12 hours’ duration. The patient reported similar previous episodes occurring intermittently over the past several months. His past medical history was significant for left hip dysplasia, requiring multiple hip surgeries. On examination, he was found to have an edematous left hemiscrotum with a left testicle that was rigid, tender, and noted to be in a transverse lie. The ultrasound revealed possible polyorchism, with two testicles on the left and one on the right (Figure 1), and left epididymitis. One of the left testicles demonstrated a loss of blood flow consistent with testicular torsion (Figure 2).Open in a separate windowFigure 1Ultrasound of the left hemiscrotum reveals two spherical structures; the one on the left is heterogeneous and hyperdense in comparison to the right.Open in a separate windowFigure 2Doppler ultrasound of left hemiscrotum. No evidence of blood flow to left spherical structure.The patient was taken to the operating room for immediate scrotal exploration. A normalappearing left testicle with a normal epididymis was noted. However, two accessory structures were noted, one of which was torsed 720°; (Figure 3). An inguinal incision was then made and a third accessory structure was noted. All three structures were connected with fibrous tissue, giving a “rosary bead” appearance. The left accessory structures were removed, a left testicular biopsy was taken, and bilateral scrotal orchipexies were performed.Open in a separate windowFigure 3Torsed accessory spleen with splenogonadal fusion.Pathology revealed a normal left testicle with a fibrovascular cord with three nodules consistent with splenic tissue. The torsed splenule demonstrated hemorrhage with neutrophillic infiltrate and thrombus consistent with chronic infarction and torsion (Figure 4).Open in a separate windowFigure 4Splenogonadal fusion, continuous type with three accessory structures.     

Calmodulin has the Potential to Function as a Ca2+-Dependent Adaptor Protein

Calmodulin (CaM) is a versatile Ca²⁺-binding protein that regulates the activity of numerous effector proteins in response to Ca²⁺ signals. Several CaM-dependent regulatory mechanisms have been identified, including autoinhibitory domain displacement, sequestration of a ligand-binding site, active site reorganization, and target protein dimerization. We recently showed that the N- and C-lobes of animal and plant CaM isoforms could independently and sequentially bind to target peptides derived from the CaM-binding domain of Nicotiana tabacum mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphatase (NtMKP1), to form a 2:1 peptide:CaM complex. This suggests that CaM might facilitate the dimerization of NtMKP1, although the dimerization mechanism is distinct from the previously described simultaneous binding of other target peptides to CaM. The independent and sequential binding of the NtMKP1 peptides to CaM also suggests an alternative plausible scenario in which the C-lobe of CaM remains tethered to NtMKP1, and the N-lobe is free to recruit a second target protein to the complex, such as an NtMKP1 target. Thus, we hypothesize that CaM may be capable of functioning as a Ca²⁺-dependent adaptor or recruiter protein.Key Words: calmodulin, calcium, EF-hand, adaptor protein, mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphataseCalcium (Ca²⁺) is a dynamic secondary messenger that regulates many signaling events in both plant and animal cells. Intracellular Ca²⁺ transients and oscillations (Ca²⁺ signals) are decoded by a large superfamily of calcium-binding proteins, the most important of which is calmodulin (CaM).^1–3 The prototypical CaM protein consists of four tandem helix-loop-helix “EF-hand” Ca²⁺-binding motifs that are divided into distinct N- and C-terminal globular lobes connected by a flexible linker. CaM proteins from all species including the single mammalian CaM and the many different plant CaM isoforms each undergo similar Ca²⁺-induced conformational changes involving a rearrangement of the position of its α-helices that opens distinct hydrophobic target protein-binding patches on the surface of each lobe; known as the “open” conformation (Fig. 1B). These hydrophobic patches can interact with numerous different target proteins including protein kinases, protein phosphatases, cytoskeletal proteins and other cell signaling enzymes, to regulate their activity. The closed or semi-open conformations adopted by the N- and C-lobes of Ca²⁺-free CaM (apo-CaM) (Fig. 1A) can also interact with another subset of proteins, to target CaM to certain cellular locations or facilitate Ca²⁺-independent regulatory events.^1–3Open in a separate windowFigure 1Structures of CaM and CaM-target complexes. (A) apo-CaM (PDB:1DMo), (B) Ca²⁺-CaM (PDB:1CLL). Complexes of CaM bound to (C) CaMBD of smooth muscle myosin light chain kinase (PDB:1CDL), (D) partial CaMBD of plasma membrane Ca²⁺-pump C20W (PDB:1CFF), (E) the adenylyl cyclase protein from Bacillus anthracis (PDB:1K93), (F) 2 glutamate decarboxylase CaMBD''s (PDB:1NWD), (G) 2 CaM proteins bound to 2 small conductance Ca²⁺-activated potassium channel (SK channel) CaMBD''s (PDB:1G4Y), (H) 2 apo-CaM proteins bound to 2 tandem IQ motifs from murine myosin V (PDB:2IX7). In each panel CaM is shown in ivory, the target molecule is shown in blue and the Ca²⁺ ions bound to the N- and/or C-lobes of CaM are represented by red spheres.The CaM-dependent regulation of target proteins can occur through numerous different mechanisms. For example, Ca²⁺-CaM can relieve autoinhibition by binding to a short (20–25 residue) calmodulin-binding domain (CaMBD) sequence that is adjacent to or within an autoinhibitory region of the enzyme (Fig. 2A).³ Numerous structures of these Ca²⁺-CaM-CaMBD complexes have been reported, which reveal a characteristic “wrap-around” binding mode (Fig. 1C). Typically the CaM C-lobe binds with high affinity to a Trp residue within the N-terminal part of the target sequence, and the flexible central linker allows the N-lobe to pivot and bind to a second bulky hydrophobic “anchor” residue within the C-terminal part of the target sequence.³ Truncation of this second anchor residue can lead to binding of only one CaM domain and an extended CaM conformation (Fig. 1D).^4,5 Studies with plant CaM isoforms having mutations to non-CaMBD-coordinating residues have also suggested that a secondary binding interface exists on the opposite surface of the CaM protein which also contributes to the activation of some of these target enzymes.^6,7Open in a separate windowFigure 2Schematic model for the various mechanisms of CaM-dependent target regulation. (A) autoinhibitory domain displacement, (B) sequestering of a ligand binding site, (C) active-site reorganization, (D) CaM-induced target protein dimerization (1:2 complex), (E) CaM-induced target protein dimerization (2:2 complex), (F) hypothesized model for CaM acting as an adaptor/recruiter protein. In each panel CaM is shown as a red dumbbell shaped molecule with Ca²⁺ ions represented by yellow circles, and the target proteins are shown in various colors. See the text for details on each model.Another regulatory mechanism involving Ca²⁺-CaM-binding to a single contiguous CaMBD sequence may occur with the potato kinesin-like CaM-binding protein (KCBP)⁸ as well as some plant cyclic-nucleotide gated channels (CNGC''s).⁹ In both cases the Ca²⁺-CaM binding site on the target protein overlaps with the respective ligand binding site, and thus the binding of KCBP to microtubules or the binding of cyclic nucleotide monophosphates to CNGC''s may be prevented by interaction with Ca²⁺-CaM (Fig. 2B). In a variation on this mechanism, CaM can bind to the cytoplasmic juxtamembrane region of the human epidermal growth factor receptor and sequester a threonine residue which is a specific phosphorylation target of protein kinase C (PKC). CaM-binding inhibits PKC phosphorylation of this threonine, and PKC phosphorylation inhibits CaM-binding.¹⁰There are also several examples of CaM-target interactions where the N- and C-lobes bind to noncontiguous target protein regions, and play distinct roles in target regulation. The structures of a CaM-activated adenylyl cyclase from Bacillus anthracis with and without bound CaM shows how the N- and C-lobes of CaM can bind two distant regions of the adenylyl cyclase enzyme and induce a conformation reorganization that creates the enzyme''s active site (Figs. 1E and ​and2C2C).¹¹ An interesting feature of this interaction is that the CaM N-lobe remains Ca²⁺-free and in a closed conformation, while the C-lobe is in a canonical Ca²⁺-bound open conformation. Indeed, Ca²⁺-binding to the C-lobe but not N-lobe is required for activation of the adenylyl cyclase.¹²The N- and C-lobes of Ca²⁺-CaM can also each simultaneously bind to identical peptides derived from the petunia glutamate decarboxylase (GAD) enzyme to form a 1:2 Ca²⁺-CaM:GAD complex (Fig. 1F).^13,14 This suggests that Ca²⁺-CaM-induced target protein dimerization may be another way in which CaM can regulate target proteins (Fig. 2D). CaM-dependent dimerization has also been shown to regulate the activity of small conductance Ca²⁺-activated K⁺ channels (SK channel), although in this case a novel 2:2 CaM:SK channel complex is formed (Figs. 1G and ​and2E2E).¹⁵ This structure is also unique because Ca²⁺ is bound to the “lower affinity” N-lobe EF-hands, but not to the “higher affinity” C-lobe EF-hands of CaM.In addition to the SK channel, CaM can regulate voltage-gated sodium channels, voltage-gated calcium channels, as well as ryanodine-sensitive calcium release channels.¹⁶ With these channels CaM typically binds in complex Ca²⁺-dependent and Ca²⁺-independent ways to several noncontiguous target sequences in the same protein, and often to so-called IQ motifs (IQXXXRGXXXR). IQ motifs are generally thought to be constitutive apo-CaM binding sites which retain CaM under resting (low [Ca²⁺]) cellular conditions to ensure a rapid response to Ca²⁺-stimuli.¹⁷ However many IQ motifs can also bind specifically to Ca²⁺-CaM or to both apo-CaM and Ca²⁺-CaM. Structures of some Ca²⁺-CaM-IQ domain complexes have revealed wrap-around binding modes, albeit with differences in lobe and peptide orientation compared to other complexes.^18–20 For a discussion about the mechanisms of CaM-dependent ion channel regulation (see ref. ¹⁶). A very recent crystal structure of apo-CaM bound to an IQ domain from myosin V (Fig. 1H) has also revealed yet another variation on the wrap-around binding mode, where the apo-C-lobe of CaM adopts a semi-open conformation and forms numerous interactions with the target sequence, while the apo-N-lobe adopts a closed conformation and forms weaker interactions with the IQ domain.²¹Using several biophysical techniques we recently characterized the interaction between CaM isoforms (mammalian CaM, soybean CaM isoforms SCaM-1 and SCaM-4) and a novel CaMBD derived from the Nicotiana tabacum mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphatase (NtMKP1).²² The NtMKP1 protein was initially identified as a CaM-binding protein by Ohashi and coworkers,²³ and the same group recently showed that CaM-binding NtMKP1 homologs are also present in other plant species as well.²⁴ We found that each CaM isoform was capable of binding to the NtMKP1 CaMBD in the absence of Ca²⁺ using only the apo-C-lobe, with the primary binding site consisting of NtMKP1 residues N438 - S449, and additional C-terminal residues G450 - K460 enhancing the overall binding affinity (K_d ∼10⁻⁵ M). In the presence of Ca²⁺, a 1:1 complex could be formed with the CaM C-lobe having significantly increased affinity for the N438 - S449 region of NtMKP1 (K_d 10⁻⁷ − 10⁻¹⁰ M). However, the Ca²⁺-loaded CaM N-lobe interacted only very weakly with the C-terminal NtMKP1 sequence in this 1:1 complex, despite an abundance of seemingly suitable hydrophobic “anchor” residues in this region. Interestingly, the addition of more peptide triggered the independent binding of a second NtMKP1 peptide to the Ca²⁺-CaM N-lobe (Kd 10⁻⁵ − 10⁻⁶ M) to form a 1:2 Ca²⁺-CaM:NtMKP1 complex. As with GAD, these results suggest that CaM is capable of facilitating the dimerization of NtMKP1, although the independent and sequential NtMKP1 peptide binding to the C- and N-lobes markedly distinguishes the CaM-NtMKP1 interaction from the simultaneous high-affinity binding of 2 GAD CaMBD''s to CaM.While our NtMKP1 study was ongoing, Ohashi and coworkers reported that CaM is incapable of stimulating the phosphatase activity of the NtMKP1 enzyme, thereby implying that the CaM-NtMKP1 interaction is necessary for something other than direct enzyme regulation.²⁵ The independent and sequential binding of the NtMKP1 fragments to the Ca²⁺-saturated C- and then N-lobes of CaM observed in our study suggests a plausible situation in which the C-lobe of CaM is tightly bound to NtMKP1, leaving the N-lobe free to recruit a different target protein to the complex, for example, a NtMKP1 protein substrate. Therefore, CaM may be capable of acting as an adaptor or recruiter protein, which would add yet another mechanism of target regulation to CaM''s repertoire (Fig. 2F). In addition to NtMKP1 peptides, the isolated N-lobe of CaM is capable of binding to other CaMBD peptides^26,27 as well as intact target proteins,²⁸ increasing the likelihood that the N-lobe could serve as a recruiter domain. The pre-association of the apo-C-lobe of CaM with NtMKP1 under resting conditions would also ensure a rapid response response to Ca²⁺-stimuli, since CaM would only need to recruit one rather than both protein targets.Although the ability of CaM to act as an adaptor protein in vivo has not yet been demonstrated, there are examples of related EF-hand proteins acting as adaptor proteins, including centrin²⁹ and calcium- and integrin-binding protein 1.³⁰ With the abundance of poorly characterized CaM-binding proteins in plants, many of which have CaMBD''s with little sequence resemblance to the better characterized motifs in animals¹ it seems likely that sequences will be identified which bind preferentially to the CaM N-lobe. Considering the incredible assortment of known CaM interaction modes and regulatory mechanisms, many of which have only been identified within the last decade, it is likely only a matter of time before CaM is proven to function as an adaptor protein in vivo.