Hypoglycemia in childhood type 1 diabetes mellitus: Understanding and managing the dark side of intensive insulin therapy

Background: Despite the availability of advanced insulin delivery systems, blood glucose-monitoring equipment, and insulin analogue formulations, hypoglycemia remains a significant concern in the treatment of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM). Furthermore, patients who manage their blood glucose levels most effectively may also be the ones at greatest risk for hypoglycemia.Objective: The aim of this article was to review current issues surrounding the pathophysiology and frequency of hypoglycemia in children and adolescents with type 1 DM.Methods: Relevant articles for this review were identified through a search of MEDLINE (1992–2007; English-language articles only). The search terms used were children, adolescents, hypoglycemia, diabetes, insulin, and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion.Results: The threat of severe hypoglycemia remains a major obstacle to the effective treatment of type 1 DM. Basalbolus therapy, using continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion or multiple daily injections, is the most effective and flexible method available for maintaining good glycemic control in children as well as in adults. Insulin analogues can be used effectively in these regimens and may be helpful toward addressing risks for hypoglycemia. Patient education should also be given a high priority in addressing the risk of hypoglycemia in children and adolescents with type 1 DM. The development of continuous glucose-monitoring systems offers the potential for an even brighter future for this group of patients.Conclusions: Recent advances in DM technology reduce but do not eliminate the risk of hypoglycemia in youth with type 1 DM. These observations underscore the need for a closed-loop insulin delivery system in which the rate of insulin infusion is regulated by real-time changes in glucose concentrations. (Insulin. 2007;2:157–165)Key words: type 1 diabetes mellitus; hypoglycemia; children; adolescents; insulin analogue; continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion; multiple daily injections; basal-bolus therapy.Accepted for publication 09052007     

Potential Place of SGLT2 Inhibitors in Treatment Paradigms for type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Objective: Following the first Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval in 2013, sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have generated much interest among physicians treating patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Here, the role in treatment with this drug class is considered in the context of T2DM treatment paradigms.Methods: The clinical trials for the SGLT2 inhibitors are examined with a focus on canagliflozin, dapagliflozin, and empagliflozin.Results: Evidence from clinical trials in patients with T2DM supports the use of SGLT2 inhibitors either as monotherapy or in addition to other glucose-lowering treatments as adjuncts to diet and exercise, and we have gained significant clinical experience in a relatively short time.Conclusion: The drugs appear to be useful in a variety of T2DM populations, contingent primarily on renal function. Most obviously, SGLT2 inhibitors appear to be well suited for patients with potential for hypoglycemia or weight gain. In clinical trials, patients treated with SGLT2 inhibitors have experienced moderate weight loss and a low risk of hypoglycemic events except when used in combination with an insulin secretagogue. In addition, SGLT2 inhibitors have been shown to reduce blood pressure, so they may be beneficial in patients with T2DM complicated by hypertension. SGLT2 inhibitors were incorporated into the 2015 American Diabetes Association (ADA)/European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) position statement on the management of hyperglycemia and received an even more prominent position in the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE)/American College of Endocrinology (ACE) comprehensive diabetes management guidelines and algorithm.Abbreviations: AE = adverse event A1C = glycated hemoglobin CI = confidence interval CKD = chronic kidney disease DKA = diabetic ketoacidosis DPP-4 = dipeptidyl peptidase 4 eGFR = estimated glomerular filtration rate FDA = Food and Drug Administration FPG = fasting plasma glucose GLP-1 = glucagon-like peptide 1 HDL-C = high-density lipoprotein cholesterol HR = hazard ratio LADA = late-onset autoimmune diabetes of adulthood LDL-C = low-density lipoprotein cholesterol MACE = major adverse cardiovascular events SGLT1 = sodium glucose cotransporter 1 SGLT2 = sodium glucose cotransporter 2 T1DM = type 1 diabetes mellitus T2DM = type 2 diabetes mellitus UACR = urine albumin to creatinine ratio     

Evaluation of Insulin Glargine and Exenatide Alone and in Combination: a Randomized Clinical Trial with Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Ambulatory Glucose Profile Analysis

Objective: Characterize the effectiveness of insulin glargine alone, exenatide alone, or combined in subjects taking stable doses of metformin and evaluate their impact on hemoglobin A1C, hypoglycemia, weight, and glucose variability.Methods: Open-label, randomized, parallel-arm study of adults with type 2 diabetes naïve to both insulin and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) agonist who were not at A1C goal despite treatment with metformin. This prospective interventional study employed blinded continuous glucose monitoring ambulatory glucose profile (AGP) reports over 32 weeks. Subjects were randomized to treatment with glargine (Iglar), exenatide (GLP-1), or combination of glargine and exenatide (Iglar + GLP-1). At midpoint, those not at A1C target had the second medication added; those on Iglar + GLP-1 continued therapy optimization.Results: Decreases in A1C were: 7.6 to 6.2% for Iglar + GLP-1, 7.5 to 6.6% for Iglar, and 7.5 to 6.4% for GLP-1. Iglar + GLP-1 achieved A1C targets faster (14 to 16 weeks) but had more hypoglycemia. Hypoglycemia rates increased slightly for all arms. Weight loss was achieved in all regimens including GLP-1. Glucose variability was not reduced to the same extent in the Iglar arm as the GLP-1 arm.Conclusion: Addition of Iglar and/or GLP-1 to metformin for patients not at treatment goal was safe and effective. The order of medication addition needs to consider individualized AGP patterns and goals. Iglar + GLP-1 resulted in rapid A1C lowering, whereas GLP-1 was noted to have less hypoglycemia. Weight loss was most pronounced in GLP-1 monotherapy, suggesting that GLP-1 may mitigate the weight gain of Iglar. Any treatment with GLP-1 showed significant decreases in glucose variability.Abbreviations: A1C = hemoglobin A1c; AGP = ambulatory glucose profile; CGM = continuous glucose monitoring; GLM = general linear model; GLP-1 = glucagon-like peptide 1 (exenatide); Iglar = insulin glargine; SGLT2 = sodium-glucose cotransporter 2; SMBG = self-monitoring blood glucose; SU = sulfonylurea; T2D = type 2 diabetes mellitus     

The Role of Glucagon in the Pathophysiology and Management of Diabetes

Objective: There is general recognition that insulin and glucagon are the main hormones involved in the pathophysiology of diabetes, but the role of glucagon in diabetes is complex and in some circumstances controversial. The increasing appreciation of the role of glucagon in currently used hypoglycemic agents and the ongoing development of glucagon-targeted therapies underscores glucagon's important contribution in optimizing diabetes management. The current review provides a background on glucagon physiology and pathophysiology and an update for investigators, endocrinologists, and other healthcare providers on glucagon-modulating therapies.Methods: A literature review was conducted utilizing published literature in PubMed and AccessMedicine including the years 1922–2015 using the following key words: glucagon, bihormonal, diabetes mellitus, glucagon antagonists, glucagon-targeted therapies.Results: Glucagon is a counterregulatory hormone that promotes hepatic glucose production, thus preventing hypoglycemia in normal physiology. In patients with diabetes mellitus, glucagon secretion may be unregulated, which contributes to problems with glucose homeostasis. Several of the most effective therapies for diabetes have been found to suppress glucagon secretion or action, which may contribute to their success. Additionally, glucagon-specific targeted therapies, such as glucagon receptor antagonists, are being studied at a basic and clinical level.Conclusion: Glucagon plays an important role in contributing to hyperglycemia in patients with diabetes. Utilizing hypoglycemic agents that decrease glucagon secretion or inhibit glucagon action can help improve glycemic control, making these agents a valuable resource in diabetes therapy.Abbreviations:cAMP = cyclic adenosine monophosphateDPP-4 = dipeptidyl peptidase 4GLP-1 = glucagon-like peptide 1GR^-/- = glucagon receptor knockoutGR-ASO = antisense oligonucleotides targeted against the glucagon receptorHbA1c = hemoglobin A1cHGP = hepatic glucose productionSGLT-2 = sodium-glucose cotrans-porter 2T1DM = type 1 diabetes mellitusT2DM = type 2 diabetes mellitus     

In vivo anti-diabetic activity of derivatives of isoliquiritigenin and liquiritigenin

Isoliquiritigenin (ISL), a chalcone and liquiritigenin (LTG), a flavonoid found in licorice roots and several other plants. ISL displays antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antitumor and hepatoprotective activities whereas LTG is an estrogenic compound, acts as an agonist selective for the β-subtype of the oestrogen receptor. Both the phenolics were isolated from the rhizomes of Glycyrrhiza glabra. Five derivatives from ISL and four derivatives from LTG were synthesized. All the compounds were established by extensive spectroscopic analyses and screened through oral glucose tolerance test to gain preliminary information regarding the antihyperglycemic effect in normal Swiss albino male mice. ISL (1), ISL derivatives 3, 4, 5, 7 and LTG derivatives 9 and 10 showed significant blood glucose lowering effect. The structure–activity relationship indicated that the presence of ether and ester groups in ISL and LTG analogues are important for exhibiting the activity. Compounds 1, 4 and 10 were selected for in vivo antidiabetic activity and found to be potential candidates for treatment of diabetes. It is the first report on antidiabetic activity of ISL derivative 4 and LTG derivative 10.     

Discovery of novel glitazones incorporated with phenylalanine and tyrosine: Synthesis,antidiabetic activity and structure–activity relationships

We report a series of new glitazones incorporated with phenylalanine and tyrosine. All the compounds were tested for their in vitro glucose uptake activity using rat-hemidiaphragm, both in presence and absence of insulin. Six of the most active compounds from the in vitro screening were taken forward for their in vivo triglyceride and glucose lowering activity against dexamethazone induced hyperlipidemia and insulin resistance in Wistar rats. The liver samples of rats that received the most active compounds, 23 and 24, in the in vivo studies, were subjected to histopathological examination to assess their short term hepatotoxicity. The investigations on the in vitro glucose uptake, in vivo triglyceride and glucose lowering activity are described here along with the quantitative structure–activity relationships.     

Short-Term Sitagliptin-Metformin Therapy Is More Effective Than Metformin Or Placebo In Prior Gestational Diabetic Women With Impaired Glucose Regulation

Objective: Our pilot study examined the effectiveness of sitagliptin-metformin (SITA-MET), metformin (MET), and placebo (P) therapy on fasting and post–glucose challenge glucose levels in postpartum women with prior gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and impaired glucose regulation.Methods: Prediabetic women (N = 36, age 18 to 42 years) with recent GDM were randomized to P (one pill twice a day), MET (1,000 mg twice a day), or SITA-MET (50 mg SITA, 1,000 mg MET twice a day) for 16 weeks in a single-blind fashion. An individualized diet and exercise plan were provided to all participants. At baseline and 16 weeks, oral glucose tolerance tests were performed to assess glycemia, mean blood glucose (MBG), and calculate insulin sensitivity (IS) and secretion (SI) indexes. Lipid profile, thyroid-stimulating hormone level, and pregnancy test were performed in the baseline sample.Results: Thirty-three (92%) participants completed the study. At study end, 15 participants had normal glycemia (SITA-MET vs. MET, P; P = .035). MBG, IS, IS-SI index, and waist to height ratio were significantly improved with SITA-MET compared with MET and P treatment. SITAMET therapy was more effective in lowering body mass index and waist circumference compared to P treatment.Conclusion: Our pilot study is the first to evaluate the use of a dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor combined with MET in glucose-impaired women with a history of GDM. In this investigation, combination SITA-MET was found to be superior to MET and P in improving glycemia and metabolic measures in this prediabetic population.Abbreviations: BID = twice a day; BMI = body mass index; BP = blood pressure; BW = body weight; CHOL = cholesterol; DI = disposition index; DM = diabetes mellitus; DPP-4i = dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor; FBG = fasting blood glucose; GDM = gestational diabetes mellitus; GLP-1 = glucagon-like peptide 1; HDL-C = high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol; HOMA-IR = homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance; IGI = insulinogenic index; IGR = impaired glucose regulation; IGT = impaired glucose tolerance; IR = insulin resistance; IS = insulin sensitivity; LDL-C = low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol; MBG = mean blood glucose; MET = metformin; OGTT = oral glucose tolerance test; P = placebo; SI = insulin secretion; SI_OGTT = Matsuda's insulin sensitivity index; TRG = triglycerides; WC = waist circumference; WHR = waist to hip ratio; WHtR = waist to height ratio     

De-Intensification of Diabetes Treatment in Elderly Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Objective: De-intensification of diabetes treatment is recommended in elderly patients with tight glycemic control at high risk of hypoglycemia. However, rates of de-intensification in endocrine practice are unknown. We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the rate of de-intensification of antidiabetic treatment in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and tight glycemic control.Methods: All patients with ≥2 clinic visits over a 1-year period at a major academic diabetes center were included. De-intensification of diabetes treatment was defined as a decrease or discontinuation of any antidiabetic drug without adding another drug, or a reduction in the total daily dose of insulin or a sulfonylurea drug with or without adding a drug without risk of hypoglycemia.Results: Out of 3,186 unique patients, 492 were ≥65 years old with T2DM and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) <7.5% (<58 mmol/mol). We found 308 patients treated with a sulfonylurea drug or insulin, 102 of whom had hypoglycemia as per physician note. Among these 102 patients, 38 (37%) were advised to de-intensify therapy. In a subgroup analysis of patients ≥75 years old with HbA1c <7% (<53 mmol/mol), we found that out of 23 patients treated with a sulfonylurea drug or insulin and reporting hypoglycemia, 11 (43%) were advised de-intensification of therapy. There were no significant predictors of de-intensification of treatment.Conclusion: Our study suggests that de-intensification of antidiabetic medications is uncommon in elderly patients with T2DM. Strategies may need to be developed to prevent the potential harm of overtreatment in this population.Abbreviations: ADA = American Diabetes Association; CGM = continuous glucose monitoring; HbA1c = hemoglobin A1c; T2DM = type 2 diabetes mellitus; UKPDS = United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study     

Design,synthesis and glucose uptake activity of some novel glitazones

Herein, we report a library consisting of some novel glitazones containing thiazolidinedione and its bioisosteres, rhodanine and oxadiazolidine ring structures as their basic scaffold for their antidiabetic activity. Twelve novel glitazones with diverse chemical structures were designed and synthesized by adopting appropriate synthetic schemes and analyzed. Later, subjected to in vitro glucose uptake assay in the absence and presence of insulin to confirm their antidiabetic activity using rat hemi-diaphragm. The titled compounds exhibited glucose uptake activity ranging weak to significant activity. Compounds 4, 5, 9, 11, 15, 16, 19 and 20 showed considerable glucose uptake activity apart from rosiglitazone, a standard drug. Compound 16 happens to be the candidate compound from this study to investigate further. The illustration about their design, synthesis, analysis and glucose uptake activity is reported here along with the in vitro and in silico study based structure–activity relationships.     

Oxytocin - An Emerging Treatment for Obesity and Dysglycemia: Review of Randomized Controlled Trials and Cohort Studies

Objective: The psychotropic mediator and neuropeptide hormone oxytocin (OXT) is emerging as a promising treatment of metabolic disorders (obesity and dysglycemia). This review focuses on studies relevant to OXT use and its mechanisms of action in metabolic disorders and wellness behavior motivation.Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort and preclinical studies identified in electronic databases were reviewed.Results: There were only a few RCTs and cohort studies related to OXT and metabolic disorders. Anorexigenic and weight-loss effects of intranasal OXT (IOXT) were evaluated in 3 double-blind RCTs involving 85 subjects. A single dose of 24 IU reduced caloric intake by 122 kcal. The 24 IU 4-times daily dose for 8 weeks produced ~9-kg weight loss (P<.001 vs. placebo) and a trend toward reduced postprandial glucose and insulin levels. Similarly, in a double-blind RCT IOXT versus placebo increased the willingness to cooperate and the expectation that others will cooperate at prosocial tasks. A cohort study showed lower serum OXT level in obese versus normal-weight subjects and a negative correlation with body mass index. Circulating OXT was also lower in type 2 diabetes versus normoglycemic subjects and negatively correlated with glycosylated hemoglobin A1C and insulin resistance.Conclusion: The gap of knowledge remains on the efficacy of OXT for metabolic indications. It is a challenge to the scientific community to provide data that can be disseminated to inform the scientific community, medical personnel, and the public about the potential benefits and risks of chronic OXT use.Abbreviations:CNS = central nervous systemDM1 = diabetes mellitus type 1DM2 = diabetes mellitus type 2GDM = gestational diabetes mellitusGI = gastrointestinalGMB = gut microbiotaIOXT = intranasal oxytoxcinOXT = oxytocinOXTR = oxytocin receptorsOXT = serum oxytocin     

American Association Of Clinical Endocrinologists And American College Of Endocrinology 2016 Outpatient Glucose Monitoring Consensus Statement

Abbreviations:A1C = glycated hemoglobinAGP = ambulatory glucose profileARD = absolute relative differenceBGM = blood glucose monitoringCGM = continuous glucose monitoringCMS = Centers for Medicare and Medicaid ServicesCSII = continuous subcutaneous insulin infusionCV = coefficient of variationDCCT = Diabetes Control and Complications TrialDirecNet = Diabetes Research in Children NetworkFDA = US Food & Drug AdministrationGDM = gestational diabetes mellitusGM = glucose monitoringIDF = International Diabetes FederationISO = International Organization for StandardizationMARD = mean absolute relative differenceMDI = multiple daily injectionsMedARD = median absolute relative differenceMNT = medical nutrition therapySAP = sensor-augmented pumpT1DM = type 1 diabetes mellitusT2DM = type 2 diabetes mellitus     

Atypical Diabetes Mellitus Associated with Bone Marrow Transplantation

ObjectiveTo describe 3 cases of atypical diabetes mellitus following bone marrow transplantation.MethodsWe describe the clinical presentation and relevant laboratory findings of 3 patients who presented with new-onset diabetes mellitus after bone marrow transplantation and discuss the possible mechanisms.ResultsA 52-year-old white man with chronic myelogenous leukemia, a 51-year-old white woman with acute myelogenous leukemia, and a 38-year-old Hispanic woman with acute myelogenous leukemia presented with acute onset of diabetes mellitus after bone marrow transplantation. Although blood glucose levels were initially very high, the patients required only small insulin dosages for glycemic control. Both the acute onset and requirement of relatively small insulin dosages were characteristic of type 1 diabetes mellitus. Onset of diabetes appeared to be unrelated to immunosuppressive drug therapy because it happened several months after starting these drugs. C-peptide was detectable, and glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies were absent. Diabetes mellitus remitted spontaneously after a few months while the immunosuppressive drugs were continued.ConclusionAlthough the underlying mechanisms are unknown, cytokine changes after bone marrow transplantation may have led to temporary b-cell dysfunction in these patients. (Endocr Pract. 2010;16:93-96)     

Dexamethasone Stress Test: A Pilot Clinical Study for Identification of Individuals Highly Prone to Develop Type 2 Diabetes

Objective: We examined whether the “Dexamethasone Stress Test” exhibits the requisite high predictive ability to identify individuals highly prone to develop type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).Methods: Seven years ago, we administered an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) to 33 individuals without T2DM and repeated the OGTT 24 hours after a single oral dose of 8 mg dexamethasone (Dex); all participants had a first-degree relative with T2DM, and close to half had prediabetes. We calculated receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for all parameters derived from the OGTT before and after Dex in individuals who subsequently developed diabetes compared to individuals who did not.Results: At 7 years of follow-up, 9 individuals had developed T2DM, while 24 remained without diabetes. None of the OGTT-derived parameters before administration of Dex had an area under the ROC curve of >0.8. However, 24 hours after Dex, three parameters, including fasting plasma insulin, homeostatic model assessment–insulin resistance, and 2-hour plasma glucose level, exhibited areas under the ROC curves of 0.84, 0.86, and 0.92, respectively.Conclusion: The Dexamethasone Stress Test appears to be a good to excellent test in identifying individuals highly prone to develop T2DM.Abbreviations: AUC = area under the curve; Dex = dexamethasone; HOMA-IR = homeostatic model assessment–insulin resistance; NGT = normal glucose tolerance; OGTT = oral glucose tolerance test; PreDiab = prediabetes; ROC = receiver operating characteristic; T2DM = type 2 diabetes mellitus     

Antidiabetic potential of phytochemicals isolated from the stem bark of Myristica fatua Houtt. var. magnifica (Bedd.) Sinclair

Phytochemical investigation of the stem bark of Myristica fatua Houtt. led to the isolation of a new compound 1 (3-tridecanoylbenzoic acid), along with six known acylphenols (2–7). All the compounds displayed moderate inhibitory activity on α-amylase and significant activity on α-glucosidase; however malabaricone B (6) and C (7) were identified as potent α-glucosidase inhibitors with IC₅₀ values of 63.70?±?0.546, and 43.61?±?0.620?µM respectively. Acylphenols (compounds 3–7) also showed significant antiglycation property. The molecular docking and dynamics simulation studies confirmed the efficient binding of malabaricone C with C-terminus of human maltase-glucoamylase (2QMJ). Malabaricone B also enhanced the 2-NBDG [2-(N-(7-nitrobenz-2-oxa-1,3-diazol-4-yl)amino)-2-deoxy glucose] uptake in L6 myotubes. These findings demonstrate that acylphenols isolated from Myristica fatua Houtt. can be considered as a lead scaffold for the treatment of type II diabetes mellitus.     

Synthesis and biological evaluation of C-glucosides with azulene rings as selective SGLT2 inhibitors for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: Discovery of YM543

Here, a series of C-glucosides with azulene rings in the aglycon moiety was synthesized and the inhibitory activities toward hSGLT1 and hSGLT2 were evaluated. Starting from the azulene derivative 7 which had relatively good SGLT2 inhibitory activity, compound 8a which has a 3-[(azulen-2-yl)methyl]phenyl group was identified as a lead compound for further optimization. Introduction of a phenolic hydroxyl group onto the central benzene ring afforded a potent and selective SGLT2 inhibitor 8e, which reduced blood glucose levels in a dose-dependent manner in rodent diabetic models. A mono choline salt of 8e (YM543) was selected as a clinical candidate for use in treating type 2 diabetes mellitus.     

The insulin secretory action of novel polycyclic guanidines: Discovery through open innovation phenotypic screening,and exploration of structure–activity relationships

We report the discovery of the glucose-dependent insulin secretogogue activity of a novel class of polycyclic guanidines through phenotypic screening as part of the Lilly Open Innovation Drug Discovery platform. Three compounds from the University of California, Irvine, 1–3, having the 3-arylhexahydropyrrolo[1,2-c]pyrimidin-1-amine scaffold acted as insulin secretagogues under high, but not low, glucose conditions. Exploration of the structure–activity relationship around the scaffold demonstrated the key role of the guanidine moiety, as well as the importance of two lipophilic regions, and led to the identification of 9h, which stimulated insulin secretion in isolated rat pancreatic islets in a glucose-dependent manner.     

Ideglira is Associated With Improved Short-Term Clinical Outcomes and Cost Savings Compared With Insulin Glargine U100 Plus Insulin Aspart in the U.S.

Objective: In the DUAL (Dual Action of Liraglutide and Insulin Degludec in Type 2 Diabetes) VII trial, IDegLira (a combination of insulin degludec and liraglutide) was compared with insulin glargine U100 plus insulin aspart. Both treatment approaches achieved similar glycemic control, but there were differences in hypoglycemia, changes in body weight, and injection frequency. The aim of the present analysis was to assess the short-term cost effectiveness of IDegLira versus insulin glargine U100 plus insulin aspart for treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus not meeting glycemic targets on basal insulin in the U.S. setting.Methods: A cost-utility model was developed to evaluate the clinical and economic outcomes associated with the 2 treatments over a 1-year time horizon, capturing the impact on quality of life of hypoglycemic events, body mass index, and injection frequency. Costs were captured from a healthcare payer perspective in 2017 U.S. dollars ($).Results: IDegLira was associated with improved quality of life by 0.12 quality-adjusted life years compared with insulin glargine U100 plus insulin aspart. The key drivers of this difference were reduced injection frequency and hypoglycemic events avoided. IDegLira was associated with increased annual drug costs, but this was entirely offset by reduced needle costs and reduced costs of self-monitoring of blood glucose testing. IDegLira was associated with total annual cost savings of $743 per patient.Conclusion: IDegLira was found to improve quality-adjusted life expectancy and reduce costs when compared with insulin glargine U100 plus insulin aspart for treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes not achieving glycemic control on basal insulin in the U.S. setting.Abbreviations: ADA = American Diabetes Association; BMI = body mass index; CI = confidence interval; DUAL = Dual Action of Liraglutide and Insulin Degludec in Type 2 Diabetes; GLP-1 = glucagon-like peptide-1; HbA1c = glycated hemoglobin; ICER = incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; IU = international units; QALY = quality-adjusted life year; SMBG = self-monitoring of blood glucose     

Incorporating postprandial and fasting plasma glucose into clinical management strategies

Background: Targeting plasma glucose is a widely accepted practice in the treatment of both type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). Although clinicians have traditionally relied on fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels for diagnosis and as a target for therapy, the focus has expanded to include the contribution of postprandial glucose (PPG) to glycosylated hemoglobin (A1C) levels.Objective: This article examines the contributions of FPG and PPG to A1C levels in patients with diabetes and discusses the impact of these findings on insulin treatment strategies for patients who fail to achieve recommended A1C goals.Methods: Relevant articles were identified through a PubMed search of the literature (1975–2007) using the following search terms: fasting plasma glucose, postprandial glucose, postprandial hyperglycemia, and glycemic control.Results: Changes in PPG levels are typically the first signs of abnormal glucose metabolism associated with type 2 DM, and they are a useful measure of glycemic control in patients with near-normal FPG and high A1C levels. A substantial proportion of patients considered to have good glycemic control (A1C <7.0%) may continue to experience elevated PPG levels, which have been linked to an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. FPG levels may predict the degree of postprandial hyperglycemia and the extent of PPG excursion. Conversely, correction of PPG levels may reduce FPG levels by suppressing hepatic glucose production. Evidence indicates that therapy targeting both FPG and PPG is associated with optimal reductions in A1C levels. At very high A1C levels (>9%-10%), FPG may play a greater role in overall glucose control than does PPG, but PPG becomes a more important contributor as A1C levels decrease. Increasing evidence supports the long-term benefits of early initiation of intensive insulin therapy. In particular, prandial insulin therapy may address the issue of postprandial hyperglycemia, which may be insufficiently controlled with oral agents and/or basal insulin alone.Conclusions: Both FPG and PPG affect A1C levels and are important contributors to determining overall glycemic control. Alternative insulin therapies (eg, inhaled insulin) that minimize barriers to insulin therapy and the appropriate targeting of FPG and PPG levels may improve long-term outcomes in patients with diabetes.     

Reduced Hypoglycemia and Comparable Efficacy with Insulin Glargine 300 U/ML Versus Insulin Glargine 100 U/ML in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Achieving Different Levels of Prebreakfast Self-Monitored Plasma Glucose

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) and insulin glargine 100 U/mL (Gla-100) in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) who reached prebreakfast self-monitored plasma glucose (SMPG) levels <100 and <130 mg/dL.Methods: This was a post hoc analysis of insulin-naïve (EDITION 3, NCT01676220) and experienced (EDITION 2, NCT01499095) patients with uncontrolled T2D, randomized to 6 months of Gla-300 versus Gla-100 treatment. Endpoints included glycated hemoglobin A1c change, hypoglycemia incidence, and event rates. Separate comparisons were done for patients achieving prebreak-fast fasting glucose of <100 versus ≥100 mg/dL and <130 versus ≥130 mg/dL.Results: Efficacy did not differ significantly between treatments in either study. Overall, basal insulin doses were ~10% higher with Gla-300 versus Gla-100. EDITION 2: overall and documented (≤70 mg/dL) hypoglycemia rates were significantly lower with Gla-300 versus Gla-100 in all SMPG groups except <100 mg/dL; nocturnal hypoglycemia rates were significantly lower with Gla-300 in all SMPG groups. EDITION 3: overall hypoglycemia rates were significantly lower with Gla-300 in patients with SMPG ≥100 mg/dL and those with SMPG <130 mg/dL; documented hypoglycemia rates were significantly lower in all SMPG groups except ≥130 mg/dL. Nocturnal and nocturnal documented hypoglycemia rates did not differ by treatment group. Hypoglycemia incidence did not differ by treatment in any SMPG group.Conclusion: In patients with T2D initiating basal insulin or previously treated for ≥6 months with basal insulin, Gla-300 provides similar efficacy to Gla-100 and reduces risk of hypoglycemia for many patients, despite a ~10% higher insulin dose.Abbreviations: A1C = glycated hemoglobin A1c; ADA = American Diabetes Association; Gla-100 = insulin glargine 100 U/mL; Gla-300 = insulin glargine 100 U/mL; OAD = oral antidiabetes drug; SMPG = self-monitored plasma glucose; T2D = type 2 diabetes     

Patients Achieving Good Glycemic Control (HBA1c <7%) Experience A Lower Rate of Hypoglycemia With Insulin Degludec Than with Insulin Glargine: A Meta-Analysis of Phase 3A Trials

Objective: Meta-analysis to compare hypoglycemia rates of basal insulin degludec (IDeg) with insulin glargine (IGlar) in patients with diabetes achieving good glycemic control (hemoglobin A_1c [HbA_1c] <7% at end of trial).Methods: In a preplanned meta-analysis, patient data from 7 randomized, treat-to-target, 26- or 52-week trials in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) or type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who administered IDeg (n = 2,899) or IGlar (n = 1,431) once daily were analyzed. Using a negative binomial regression model, this meta-analysis compared hypoglycemia rates in patients achieving HbA_1c <7% at end of trial with IDeg (n = 1,347) and IGlar (n = 697).Results: In all trials, IDeg was noninferior to IGlar in HbA_1c reduction from baseline. At end of trial, 2,044 patients (T2DM, n = 1,661; T1DM, n = 383) achieved HbA_1c <7%. The overall confirmed hypoglycemia rate, defined as plasma glucose <56 mg/dL or severe hypoglycemia if requiring assistance, was significantly lower with IDeg versus IGlar (estimated rate ratio [ERR] IDeg:IGlar, 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76 to 0.98). The nocturnal confirmed hypoglycemia rate, defined as occurring between midnight and 6:00 am, was significantly lower with IDeg (ERR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.77). In the maintenance period (16 weeks onward when average insulin dose and glycemic levels stabilized), the overall confirmed hypoglycemia rate was significantly lower (ERR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.68 to 0.92) and the nocturnal confirmed hypoglycemia rate was significantly lower (ERR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.72) with IDeg versus IGlar.Conclusion: Patients with T1DM and T2DM achieved HbA_1c <7% with significantly lower rates of overall and nocturnal confirmed hypoglycemia with IDeg versus IGlar. The lower hypoglycemia rate with IDeg was more pronounced in the maintenance period.Abbreviations: ERR = estimated rate ratio; HbA_1c = hemoglobin A_1c; IDeg = insulin degludec; IGlar = insulin glargine; NPH = Neutral Protamine Hagedorn; PG = plasma glucose; T1DM = type 1 diabetes mellitus; T2DM = type 2 diabetes mellitus