<Emphasis Type="Italic">Drosophila</Emphasis> CENP-C is essential for centromere identity

Centromeres are specialized chromosomal domains that direct mitotic kinetochore assembly and are defined by the presence of CENP-A (CID in Drosophila) and CENP-C. While the role of CENP-A appears to be highly conserved, functional studies in different organisms suggest that the precise role of CENP-C in kinetochore assembly is still under debate. Previous studies in vertebrate cells have shown that CENP-C inactivation causes mitotic delay, chromosome missegregation, and apoptosis; however, in Drosophila, the role of CENP-C is not well-defined. We have used RNA interference depletion in S2 cells to address this question and we find that depletion of CENP-C causes a kinetochore null phenotype, and consequently, the spindle checkpoint, kinetochore–microtubule interactions, and spindle size are severely misregulated. Importantly, we show that CENP-C is required for centromere identity as CID, MEI-S332, and chromosomal passenger proteins fail to localize in CENP-C depleted cells, suggesting a tight communication between the inner kinetochore proteins and centromeres. We suggest that CENP-C might fulfill the structural roles of the human centromere-associated proteins not identified in Drosophila.     

The ultrastructure of the kinetochore and kinetochore fiber in Drosophila somatic cells

Drosophila melanogaster is a widely used model organism for the molecular dissection of mitosis in animals. However, despite the popularity of this system, no studies have been published on the ultrastructure of Drosophila kinetochores and kinetochore fibers (K-fibers) in somatic cells. To amend this situation, we used correlative light (LM) and electron microscopy (EM) to study kinetochores in cultured Drosophila S2 cells during metaphase, and after colchicine treatment to depolymerize all microtubules (MTs). We find that the structure of attached kinetochores in S2 cells is indistinct, consisting of an amorphous inner zone associated with a more electron-dense peripheral surface layer that is approximately 40–50 nm thick. On average, each S2 kinetochore binds 11±2 MTs, in contrast to the 4–6 MTs per kinetochore reported for Drosophila spermatocytes. Importantly, nearly all of the kinetochore MT plus ends terminate in the peripheral surface layer, which we argue is analogous to the outer plate in vertebrate kinetochores. Our structural observations provide important data for assessing the results of RNAi studies of mitosis, as well as for the development of mathematical modelling and computer simulation studies in Drosophila and related organisms.Electronic supplementary material Supplementary material is available for this article at and is accessible to authorized users.     

Localization of the Drosophila checkpoint control protein Bub3 to the kinetochore requires Bub1 but not Zw10 or Rod

We report here the isolation and molecular characterization of the Drosophila homolog of the mitotic checkpoint control protein Bub3. The Drosophila Bub3 protein is associated with the centromere/kinetochore of chromosomes in larval neuroblasts whose spindle assembly checkpoints have been activated by incubation with the microtubule-depolymerizing agent colchicine. Drosophila Bub3 is also found at the kinetochore regions in mitotic larval neuroblasts and in meiotic primary and secondary spermatocytes, with the strong signal seen during prophase and prometaphase becoming increasingly weaker after the chromosomes have aligned at the metaphase plate. We further show that the localization of Bub3 to the kinetochore is disrupted by mutations in the gene encoding the Drosophila homolog of the spindle assembly checkpoint protein Bub1. Combined with recent findings showing that the kinetochore localization of Bub1 conversely depends upon Bub3, these results support the hypothesis that the spindle assembly checkpoint proteins exist as a multiprotein complex recruited as a unit to the kinetochore. In contrast, we demonstrate that the kinetochore constituents Zw10 and Rod are not needed for the binding of Bub3 to the kinetochore. This suggests that the kinetochore is assembled in at least two relatively independent pathways. Received: 6 August 1998 / Accepted: 28 August 1998     

The cenpB gene is not essential in mice

Centromere protein B (CENP-B) is a centromeric DNA-binding protein that binds to α-satellite DNA at the 17 bp CENP-B box sequence. The binding of CENP-B, along with other proteins, to α-satellite DNA sequences at the centromere, is thought to package the DNA into heterochromatin subjacent to the kinetochore of mitotic chromosomes. To determine the importance of CENP-B to kinetochore assembly and function, we generated a mouse null for the cenpB gene. The deletion removed part of the promoter and the entire coding sequence except for the carboxyl-terminal 35 amino acids of the CENP-B polypeptide. Mice heterozygous or homozygous for the cenpB null mutation are viable and healthy, with no apparent defect in growth and morphology. We have established mouse embryo fibroblasts from heterozygous and homozygous cenpB null littermates. Microscopic analysis, using immunofluorescence and electron microscopy of the cultured cells, indicated that the centromere-kinetochore complex was intact and identical to control cells. Mitosis was identical in fibroblasts derived from cenpB wild-type, heterozygous and null animals. Our studies demonstrate that CENP-B is not required for the assembly of heterochromatin or the kinetochore, or for completion of mitosis. Received: 17 September 1998 / Accepted: 9 October 1998     

Actin and myosin inhibitors block elongation of kinetochore fibre stubs in metaphase crane-fly spermatocytes

Summary. We used an ultraviolet microbeam to cut individual kinetochore spindle fibres in metaphase crane-fly spermatocytes. We then followed the growth of the “kinetochore stubs”, the remnants of kinetochore fibres that remain attached to kinetochores. Kinetochore stubs elongate with constant velocity by adding tubulin subunits at the kinetochore, and thus elongation is related to tubulin flux in the kinetochore microtubules. Stub elongation was blocked by cytochalasin D and latrunculin A, actin inhibitors, and by butanedione monoxime, a myosin inhibitor. We conclude that actin and myosin are involved in generating elongation and thus in producing tubulin flux in kinetochore microtubules. We suggest that actin and myosin act in concert with a spindle matrix to propel kinetochore fibres poleward, thereby causing stub elongation and generating anaphase chromosome movement in nonirradiated cells. Correspondence: A. Forer, Biology Department, York University, 4700 Keele Street, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada.     

The behaviour of kinetochore microtubules during meiosis in the fungusSaprolegnia

Summary InSaprolegnia, kinetochore microtubules persist throughout the mitotic nuclear cycle but, whilst present at leptotene, they disappear coincidently with the formation of synaptonemal complexes at pachytene and reform at metaphase I. In some other fungi chromosomal segregation is random in meiosis and non-random in mitosis. The attachment of chromosomes to persistent kinetochore microtubules in mitosis, but not meiosis, inSaprolegnia provides a plausible explanation for such behaviour. At metaphase I each bivalent is connected to the spindle by 2 laterally paired kinetochore microtubules whereas at metaphase II (as in mitosis) each univalent bears only one kinetochore microtubule, thus showing that all kinetochores are fully active at all stages of meiosis.     

Pac-Man does not resolve the enduring problem of anaphase chromosome movement

Summary The Pac-Man hypothesis suggests that poleward movement of chromosomes during anaphase A is brought about by: disassembly of kinetochore microtubules (MTs) at the kinetochore; generation of the poleward force exclusively at or very close to the kinetochore; and the required energy coming from coupled disassembly of these MTs. This model has become widely accepted and cited as the sole or major mechanism of anaphase A. Rarely acknowledged are several significant phenomena that refute some or all of these postulates. We summarise these anomalies as follows: poleward movement of chromosomes occurring without insertion of any MTs at the kinetochore; anaphase shortening of kinetochore fibres in spindles entirely devoid of chromosomes and, presumably, kinetochores; continued movement of chromosomes while their severed kinetochore stub elongated poleward after treatment with UV microbeams; and fluxing of tubulin subunits through kinetochore MTs during anaphase A, indicating that during anaphase, kinetochore MTs disassemble partly or solely at the poles.Dedicated to Professor Brian E. S. Gunning on the occasion of his 65th birthday     

The motor for poleward chromosome movement in anaphase is in or near the kinetochore

I have tested two contending views of chromosome-to-pole movement in anaphase. Chromosomes might be pulled poleward by a traction fiber consisting of the kinetochore microtubules and associated motors, or they might propel themselves by a motor in the kinetochore. I cut through the spindle of demembranated grasshopper spermatocytes between the chromosomes and one pole and swept the polar region away, removing a portion of the would-be traction fiber. Chromosome movement continued, and in the best examples, chromosomes moved to within 1 micron of the cut edge. There is nothing beyond the edge to support movement, and a push from the rear is unlikely because cuts in the interzone behind the separating chromosomes did not stop movement. Therefore, I conclude that the motor must be in the kinetochore or within 1 micron of it. Less conclusive evidence points to the kinetochore itself as the motor. The alternative is an external motor pulling on the kinetochore microtubules or directly on the kinetochore. A pulling motor would move kinetochore microtubules along with the chromosome, so that in a cut half-spindle, the microtubules should protrude from the cut edge as chromosomes move toward it. No protrusion was seen; however, the possibility that microtubules depolymerize as they are extruded, though unlikely, is not ruled out. What is certain is that the motor for poleward chromosome movement in anaphase must be in the kinetochore or very close to it.     

CENP-G: a new centromeric protein that is associated with the α-1 satellite DNA subfamily

A new constitutive centromere-specific protein (CENP) has been identified as a result of its recognition as an autoantigen by serum from a patient with gastric antral vascular ectasia disease. Conventional immunoblotting and two-dimensional double blotting with both this antiserum and a known anti-centromere antiserum showed that this antiserum predominantly recognized a M _r 95,000 protein that is different from all known CENPs. We have named this new protein CENP-G. This protein was detected at the centromeric region throughout the cell cycle. In mitosis, it was restricted to the kinetochore inner plate as shown by immunogold labeling and electron microscopy. The centromeres of some human chromosomes are known to contain two subfamilies of α-satellite DNA. Using immunofluorescence combined with fluorescent in situ hybridization with subfamily-specific DNA probes, we revealed that CENP-G was specifically associated with one of the subfamilies, which we have named α-1, but not the other. The localization and the α-1-specific association suggested that CENP-G may play a role in kinetochore organization and function. Like CENP-B and C, but unlike CENP-A, this protein remained with the nuclear matrix after intensive extraction. While CENP-B is absent from the human Y chromosome, the existence of CENP-G on the Y chromosome has been proven by immunofluorescence and whole chromosome painting. CENP-G was also detected in CHO, Indian muntjac and Chinese muntjac cells, suggesting that it is conserved in evolution. Received: 23 March 1998 / Accepted: 2 April 1998     

Intrakinetochore localization and essential functional domains of Drosophila Spc105

The kinetochore is assembled during mitotic and meiotic divisions within the centromeric region of chromosomes. It is composed of more than eighty different proteins. Spc105 (also designated as Spc7, KNL‐1 or Blinkin in different eukaryotes) is a comparatively large kinetochore protein, which can bind to the Mis12/MIND and Ndc80 complexes and to the spindle assembly checkpoint components Bub1 and BubR1. Our genetic characterization of Drosophila Spc105 shows that a truncated version lacking the rapidly evolving, repetitive central third still provides all essential functions. Moreover, in comparison with Cenp‐C that has previously been observed to extend from the inner to the outer kinetochore region, full‐length Spc105 is positioned further out and is not similarly extended along the spindle axis. Thus, our results indicate that Spc105 forms neither an extended link connecting inner Cenp‐A chromatin with outer kinetochore regions nor a scaffold constraining kinetochore subcomplexes and spindle assembly checkpoint components together into a geometrically rigid supercomplex. Spc105 seems to provide a platform within the outer kinetochore allowing independent assembly of various kinetochore components.     

The kinetochore fiber structure in the acentric spindles of the green algaOedogonium

Summary The microtubule (MT) arrangement in three kinetochore fibers in the acentric spindles of the green algaOedogonium cardiacum were reconstructed from serial sections of prometaphase and metaphase cells. The majority of the MTs attached to the kinetochore (kMTs) are relatively short, extending less than a third of the distance to the putative spindle pole region, and none extended the full distance. Fine filaments and a matrix described earlier (Schibler andPickett-Heaps 1980) were associated with the MTs all along the fibers. Live cells ofOedogonium were also studied by time lapse cinematography for correlation with the ultrastructural observations. Late prometaphase and metaphase kinetochore fibers appear to move independently as if unattached at their poleward ends. These observations suggest that kinetochore fibers inOedogonium are not attached to a specific pole structure from late prometaphase until the inception of anaphase. The results are discussed with reference to spindle structure and function in general.     

Cytochemistry of kinetochores under electron microscopy

A cytochemical analysis has been performed on kinetochores of mouse, Allium and grasshopper under the electron microscope. The study was carried out using serial sections and cytochemical methods. Alcoholic PTA was used for basic protein staining and the EDTA method for preferential staining of ribonucleoproteins. In mouse and Allium chromosomes the kinetochore appears positively stained after PTA and EDTA. In grasshopper chromosomes, kinetochores appear as a fibrillar and less dense region and are positively stained after EDTA. Blocks from mouse treated with HCl prior to PTA stain show lower contrast in the kinetochore. When Allium cepa anthers were treated with RNase and perchloric acid (PCA) there was no positive effect after EDTA stain in the kinetochore region. It is suggested that non-DNA material takes part in the constitution of the kinetochore. This material would be made up, at least in part, of basic proteins and ribonucleoproteins.     

The budding yeast kinetochore: less simple than expected

Summary We focus on the established kinetochore proteins of the budding yeast,Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The location and functional evidence for each kinetochore protein is summarized along with the data that supports protein-protein and genetic interactions. Models are proposed to illustrate how these kinetochore proteins assemble to evoke a kinetochore-centromere complex.     

Meiosis in Drosophila melanogaster

Individual bivalents or chromosomes have been identified in Drosophila melanogaster spermatocytes at metaphase I, anaphase I, metaphase II and anaphase II in electron micrographs of serial sections. Identification was based on a combination of chromosome volume analysis, bivalent topology, and kinetochore position. — Kinetochore microtubule numbers have been obtained for the identified chromosomes at all four meiotic stages. Average numbers in D. melanogaster are relatively low compared to reported numbers of other higher eukaryotes. There are no differences in kinetochore microtubule numbers within a stage despite a large (approximately tenfold) difference in chromosome volume between the largest and the smallest chromosome. A comparison between the two meiotic metaphases (metaphase I and metaphase II) reveals that metaphase I kinetochores possess twice as many microtubules as metaphase II kinetochores. — Other microtubules in addition to those that end on or penetrate the kinetochore are found in the vicinity of the kinetochore. These microtubules penetrate the chromosome rather than the kinetochore proper and are more numerous at metaphase I than at the other division stages.     

Chromosome behavior after laser microirradiation of a single kinetochore in mitotic PtK2 cells

The role of the kinetochore in chromosome movement was studied by 532- nm wavelength laser microirradiation of mitotic PtK2 cells. When the kinetochore of a single chromatid is irradiated at mitotic prometaphase or metaphase, the whole chromosome moves towards the pole to which the unirradiated kinetochore is oriented, while the remaining chromosomes congregate on the metaphase plate. The chromatids of the irradiated chromosome remain attached to one another until anaphase, at which time they separate by a distance of 1 or 2 micrometers and remain parallel to each other, not undergoing any poleward separation. Electron microscopy shows that irradiated chromatids exhibit either no recognizable kinetochore structure or a typical inactive kinetochore in which the tri-layer structure is present but has no microtubules associated with it. Graphical analysis of the movement of the irradiated chromosome shows that the chromosome moves to the pole rapidly with a velocity of approximately 3 micrometers/min. If the chromosome is close to one pole at irradiation, and the kinetochore oriented towards that pole is irradiated, the chromosome moves across the spindle to the opposite pole. The chromosome is slowed down as it traverses the equatorial region, but the velocity in both half-spindles is approximately the same as the anaphase velocity of a single chromatid. Thus a single kinetochore moves twice the normal mass of chromatin (two chromatids) at the same velocity with which it moves a single chromatid, showing that the velocity with which a kinetochore moves is independent, within limits, of the mass associated with it.     

Kinetochore behavior during generative cell division inTradescantia virginiana

Summary Previous observations indicate that division of the generative cell inTradescantia virginiana is characterized by several unusual features, including persistence of surrounding microtubule (Mt) bundles during karyokinesis, lack of a distinct metaphase plate and direct contribution by mitotic Mts to the cytoskeleton of young sperm. We have further probed karyokinesis in these cells using additional antitubulin and chromosome staining, as well as kinetochore visualizations with CREST serum. The CREST antibodies reveal kinetochores as paired and single fluorescent dots similar to those seen in other species stained with this preparation. Double localizations show that the dots are located at the ends of Mt bundles previously identified as kinetochore fibers (Palevitz and Cresti 1989). Before anaphase, paired kinetochores are distributed along the length of the cell. They also tend to be located at the cell periphery or are directly connected to peripheral Mt bundles by their kinetochore (K)-fibers. Twelve pairs of dots can be counted per cell, equal to the expected number of chromosomes. During anaphase, kinetochore separation starts at various positions along the length of the cell, producing single, relatively uniformly distributed kinetochores in the crotches of forks formed by K-fiber trunks and elongating Mt branches attached to the base of the trunks. Eventually, K-fibers with attached kinetochores aggregate in stepwise fashion on thick Mt bundles at both ends of the cell. This pattern is reflected in the cytoskeleton of young sperm. These results further document the unusual distribution of chromosomes and kinetochores inTradescantia generative cells and the origin of the Mt cytoskeleton in sperm cells.Abbreviations CREST Calcinosis, Raynaud's phenomenon, Esophageal dysmotility, Sclerodactyly, Telangiectasia - K-fiber kinetochore fiber - Mt microtubule Dedicated to the memory of Professor Oswald Kiermayer     

Variation of the chromosome phenotype in zea,solanum and salvia

Summary InSolanum lycopersicum pachytene chromosomes the gradient in chromomere size, originating on both sides of the kinetochore, reveals the following characteristics: 1. a relatively abrupt decrease in size of the large chromomeres, 2. the gradient is related to arm length in 9 of the 12 chromosomes, 3. the gradient is particularly irregular in the short arm of the nucleolar chromosome and in the long arm is not conspicuous, 4. chromosome 6 shows an abrupt interruption in the gradient close to the kinetochore. Salvia viridis andZea mays chromosomes represent intermediate conditions between species with well defined and species without gradients. InSalvia the intermediate condition is manifested by the presence of a very large chromomere on each side of the kinetochore followed by very small chromomeres. In two chromosomes the intermediate condition is particularly apparent. In these chromosomes two chromomeres of intermediate size are present in the proximal region of the long arm. The nucleolar organizing arm has also an irregular pattern in this species.Maize has a less distinct gradient than tomato in all its chromosomes. Chromosomes 3, 4, 5 and 8 are those where the gradient is the least sharp. The nucleolar organizing arm of chromosome 6 has also an irregular pattern.In a translocation between chromosomes 5 and 6 of maize, a segment composed of very small chromomeres from the distal region of 5 which was moved to the right of the kinetochore of chromosome 6, did not change appreciably its phenotype after ten years of cultivation. During the period of cultivation a selection was made for plants where the original phenotype was preserved so that this result cannot be considered as demonstrating an absence of change in chromomere phenotype with changed position.InDrosophila andChironomus salivary gland chromosomes where chromomeres are large, and no selection has been carried out with such a purpose, the pattern and nucleic acid content of the bands is known to change when rearrangements occur within the chromosome.Supported by a grant from the Swedish Natural Science Research Council toA. Lima-De-Faria. This work was partly carried out at the Department of Botany, University of Illinois, U.S.A. during a visit to this department byA. Lima-De-Faria.P. Sarvella's collaboration in this work was done during her stay at the University of Lund.     

The hairpin region of Ndc80 is important for the kinetochore recruitment of Mph1/MPS1 in fission yeast

The establishment of proper kinetochore-microtubule attachments facilitates faithful chromosome segregation. Incorrect attachments activate the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC), which blocks anaphase onset via recruitment of a cohort of SAC components (Mph1/MPS1, Mad1, Mad2, Mad3/BubR1, Bub1 and Bub3) to kinetochores. KNL1, a component of the outer kinetochore KMN network (KNL1/Mis12 complex/Ndc80 complex), acts as a platform for Bub1 and Bub3 localization upon its phosphorylation by Mph1/MPS1. The Ndc80 protein, a major microtubule-binding site, is critical for MPS1 localization to the kinetochores in mammalian cells. Here we characterized the newly isolated mutant ndc80-AK01 in fission yeast, which contains a single point mutation within the hairpin region. This hairpin connects the preceding calponin-homology domain with the coiled-coil region. ndc80-AK01 was hypersensitive to microtubule depolymerizing reagents with no apparent growth defects without drugs. Subsequent analyses indicated that ndc80-AK01 is defective in SAC signaling, as mutant cells proceeded into lethal cell division in the absence of microtubules. Under mitotic arrest conditions, all SAC components (Ark1/Aurora B, Mph1, Bub1, Bub3, Mad3, Mad2 and Mad1) did not localize to the kinetochore. Further genetic analyses indicated that the Ndc80 hairpin region might act as a platform for the kinetochore recruitment of Mph1, which is one of the most upstream SAC components in the hierarchy. Intriguingly, artificial tethering of Mph1 to the kinetochore fully restored checkpoint signaling in ndc80-AK01 cells, further substantiating the notion that Ndc80 is a kinetochore platform for Mph1. The hairpin region of Ndc80, therefore, plays a critical role in kinetochore recruitment of Mph1.     

Holocentric chromosomes in Oncopeltus: kinetochore plates are present in mitosis but absent in meiosis

Fine structure studies of Oncopeltus fasciatus, an hemipteran with diffuse kinetochores, shows the presence of a kinetochore plate extending for up to 75% of the length of the chromosomes during mitosis. During meiosis, microtubules entered all along the body of the chromosomes and the kinetochore plate was completely missing. It is suggested that in organisms with holocentric chromosomes the formation of the meiotic kinetochore apparatus may have to be suppressed to allow terminalization of chiasmata.Supported by N.I.H. Grant No. GM-15886.     

Kinetochore microtubules and chromosome movement during prometaphase in Drosophila melanogaster spermatocytes studied in life and with the electron microscope

Prometaphase I chromosome behavior was examined in wild-type Drosophila melanogaster primary spermatocytes. Cine analysis of live cells reveals that bivalents exhibit complex motions that include (1) transient bipolar orientations, (2) simultaneous reorientation of homologous kinetochores, (3) movements not parallel to the spindle axis, and (4) movement along the nuclear membrane. — Kinetochores and kinetochore microtubule have been analyzed for bivalents previously studied in life. The results suggest that most chromosome motions (complex though they may be) can be explained by poleward forces acting on or through kinetochore microtubules that span the distance between the kinetochore and the vicinity of a pole. The results also suggest that the majority of short kinetochore microtubules may be remnants of previous microtubule-mediated associations between a kinetochore and a pole.