Suppression of androgen receptor signaling in prostate cancer cells by an inhibitory receptor variant

There is increasing evidence that sensitization of the androgen receptor (AR) signaling pathway contributes to the failure of androgen ablation therapy for prostate cancer, and that direct targeting of the AR may be a useful therapeutic approach. To better understand how AR function could be abrogated in prostate cancer cells, we have developed a series of putative dominant-negative variants of the human AR, containing deletions or mutations in activation functions AF-1, AF-5, and/or AF-2. One construct, AR inhibitor (ARi)-410, containing a deletion of AF-1 and part of AF-5 of the AR, had no intrinsic transactivation activity but inhibited wild-type AR (wtAR) in a ligand-dependent manner by at least 95% when transfected at a 4:1 molar ratio. ARi-410 was an equally potent inhibitor of gain-of-function AR variants. Ectopic expression of ARi-410 inhibited the proliferation of AR-positive LNCaP cells, but not AR-negative PC-3 cells. Whereas ARi-410 also marginally inhibited progesterone receptor activity, this was far less pronounced than the effect on AR (50% vs. 95% maximal inhibition, respectively), and there was no inhibition of either vitamin D or estrogen receptor activity. In the presence of ligand, ARi-410 interacted with wtAR, and both receptors translocated into the nucleus. Whereas the amino-carboxy terminal interaction was not necessary for optimal dominant-negative activity, disruption of dimerization through the ligand binding domain reduced the efficacy of ARi-410. In addition, although inhibition of AR function by ARi-410 was not dependent on DNA binding, the DNA binding domain was required for dominant-negative activity. Taken together, our results suggest that interaction between ARi-410 and the endogenous AR in prostate cancer cells, potentially through the DNA binding and ligand binding domains, results in a functionally significant reduction in AR signaling and AR-dependent cell growth.     

Colocalization and ligand-dependent discrete distribution of the estrogen receptor (ER)alpha and ERbeta

To investigate the relationships between the loci expressing functions of estrogen receptor (ER)alpha and that of ERbeta, we analyzed the subnuclear distribution of ERalpha and ERbeta in response to ligand in single living cells using fusion proteins labeled with different spectral variants of green fluorescent protein. Upon activation with ligand treatment, fluorescent protein-tagged (FP)-ERbeta redistributed from a diffuse to discrete pattern within the nucleus, showing a similar time course as FP-ERalpha, and colocalized with FP-ERalpha in the same discrete cluster. Analysis using deletion mutants of ERalpha suggested that the ligand-dependent redistribution of ERalpha might occur through a large part of the receptor including at least the latter part of activation function (AF)-1, the DNA binding domain, nuclear matrix binding domain, and AF-2/ligand binding domain. In addition, a single AF-1 region within ERalpha homodimer, or a single DNA binding domain as well as AF-1 region within the ERalpha/ERbeta heterodimer, could be sufficient for the cluster formation. More than half of the discrete clusters of FP-ERalpha and FP-ERbeta were colocalized with hyperacetylated histone H4 and a component of the chromatin remodeling complex, Brg-1, indicating that ERs clusters might be involved in structural changes of chromatin.     

Melatonin blocks the activation of estrogen receptor for DNA binding.

The present study shows that melatonin prevents, within the first cell cycle, the estradiol-induced growth of synchronized MCF7 breast cancer cells. By using nuclear extracts of these cells, we first examined the binding of estradiol-estrogen receptor complexes to estrogen-responsive elements and found that the addition of estradiol to whole cells activates the binding of the estrogen receptor to DNA whereas melatonin blocks this interaction. By contrast, melatonin neither affects the binding of estradiol to its receptor nor the receptor nuclear localization. Moreover, we also show that addition of estradiol to nuclear extracts stimulates the binding of estrogen receptor to DNA, but this activation is also prevented by melatonin. The inhibitory effect caused by melatonin is saturable at nanomolar concentrations and does not appear to be mediated by RZR nuclear receptors. The effect is also specific, since indol derivatives do not cause significant inhibition. Furthermore, we provide evidence that melatonin does not interact with the estrogen receptor in the absence of estradiol. Together, these results demonstrate that melatonin interferes with the activation of estrogen receptor by estradiol. The effect of melatonin suggests the presence of a receptor that, upon melatonin addition, destabilizes the binding of the estradiol-estrogen receptor complex to the estrogen responsive element.     

Differential DNA-binding abilities of estrogen receptor occupied with two classes of antiestrogens: studies using human estrogen receptor overexpressed in mammalian cells.

We have developed a transient transfection system using the Cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter to express the human estrogen receptor (ER) at very high levels in COS-1 cells and have used it to study the interaction of agonist and antagonist receptor complexes with estrogen response element (ERE) DNA. ER can be expressed to levels of 20-40 pmol/mg or 0.2-0.3% of total soluble protein and all of the soluble receptor is capable of binding hormone. The ER binds estradiol with high affinity (Kd 0.2 nM), and is indistinguishable from native ER in that the receptor is capable of recognizing its cognate DNA response element with high affinity, and of transactivating a transgene in an estradiol-dependent manner. Gel mobility shift assays reveal interesting ligand-dependent differences in the binding of receptor complexes to ERE DNA. Receptors occupied by estradiol or the type I antiestrogen transhydroxytamoxifen bind to DNA response elements when exposed to the ligand in vitro or in vivo. Likewise, receptors exposed to the type II antiestrogen ICI 164,384 in vitro bind to ERE DNA. However, when receptor exposure to ICI 164,384 is carried out in vivo, the ER-ICI 164,384 complexes do not bind to ERE DNA, or do so only weakly. This effect is not reversed by subsequent incubation with estradiol in vitro, but is rapidly reversible by in vivo estradiol exposure of intact COS-1 cells. This suggests there may be some cellular process involved in the mechanism of antagonism by the pure antiestrogen ICI 164,384, which is not observed in cell-free extracts.     

The binding activity of estrogen receptor to DNA and heat shock protein (Mr 90,000) is dependent on receptor-bound metal

1,10-Phenanthroline inhibited the DNA-cellulose binding of the transformed calf uterus estrogen receptor (homodimer of 66-kDa molecules: 5 S estrogen receptor) in a temperature- and concentration-dependent manner. This result appears related to the metal-chelating property of 1,10-phenanthroline, since the inhibition was decreased by addition of Zn2+ and Cd2+, but not by Ca2+, Ba2+, or Mg2+ for which the affinity of the chelator is low. Only a slight inhibition was observed in the presence of the 1,7-phenanthroline, a nonchelating analogue. After dialysis or filtration to remove free 1,10-phenanthroline, DNA binding of the 5 S estrogen receptor was still inhibited. Conversely, the chelator was unable to release prebound 5 S estrogen receptor from DNA-cellulose. The 5 S estrogen receptor DNA binding was inhibited when 1,10-phenanthroline was present during the transformation to activated receptor of the hetero-oligomeric nontransformed 9 S estrogen receptor, in which the hormone binding subunits are associated with heat shock protein, Mr 90,000 (hsp 90) molecules. In contrast, if 1,10-phenanthroline was removed before the transformation took place, only a slight inhibition was observed. Other experiments with EDTA indicated a similar inhibition of DNA-cellulose binding by the 5 S estradiol receptor, and all metal ions chelated by this agent prevented its inhibitory effect. The results indicate that 1,10-phenanthroline inhibited the DNA binding of the transformed 5 S estradiol receptor by chelating metal ion tightly bound to the receptor, which is not accessible to the chelator when the receptor is bound to DNA or to hsp 90. Therefore, they suggest that the metal ion may play a critical role in the interaction with DNA and hsp 90 by maintaining the structural integrity of the implicated receptor domain.