TRF2-Tethered TIN2 Can Mediate Telomere Protection by TPP1/POT1

The shelterin protein TIN2 is required for the telomeric accumulation of TPP1/POT1 heterodimers and for the protection of telomeres by the POT1 proteins (POT1a and POT1b in the mouse). TIN2 also binds to TRF1 and TRF2, improving the telomeric localization of TRF2 and its function. Here, we ask whether TIN2 needs to interact with both TRF1 and TRF2 to mediate the telomere protection afforded by TRF2 and POT1a/b. Using a TIN2 allele deficient in TRF1 binding (TIN2-L247E), we demonstrate that TRF1 is required for optimal recruitment of TIN2 to telomeres and document phenotypes associated with the TIN2-L247E allele that are explained by insufficient TIN2 loading onto telomeres. To bypass the requirement for TRF1-dependent recruitment, we fused TIN2-L247E to the TRF2-interacting (RCT) domain of Rap1. The RCT-TIN2-L247E fusion showed improved telomeric localization and was fully functional in terms of chromosome end protection by TRF2, TPP1/POT1a, and TPP1/POT1b. These data indicate that when sufficient TIN2 is loaded onto telomeres, its interaction with TRF1 is not required to mediate the function of TRF2 and the TPP1/POT1 heterodimers. We therefore conclude that shelterin can protect chromosome ends as a TRF2-tethered TIN2/TPP1/POT1 complex that lacks a physical connection to TRF1.     

Binding of TPP1 Protein to TIN2 Protein Is Required for POT1a,b Protein-mediated Telomere Protection

The single-stranded DNA binding proteins in mouse shelterin, POT1a and POT1b, accumulate at telomeres as heterodimers with TPP1, which binds TIN2 and thus links the TPP1/POT1 dimers with TRF1 and TRF2/Rap1. When TPP1 is tethered to TIN2/TRF1/TRF2, POT1a is thought to block replication protein A binding to the single-stranded telomeric DNA and prevent ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related kinase activation. Similarly, TPP1/POT1b tethered to TIN2 can control the formation of the correct single-stranded telomeric overhang. Consistent with this view, the telomeric phenotypes following deletion of POT1a,b or TPP1 are phenocopied in TIN2-deficient cells. However, the loading of TRF1 and TRF2/Rap1 is additionally compromised in TIN2 KO cells, leading to added phenotypes. Therefore, it could not be excluded that, in addition to TIN2, other components of shelterin contribute to the recruitment of TPP1/POT1a,b as suggested by previous reports. To test whether TIN2 is the sole link between TPP1/POT1a,b and telomeres, we defined the TPP1 interaction domain of TIN2 and generated a TIN2 allele that was unable to interact with TPP1 but retained its interaction with TRF1 and TRF2. We demonstrated that cells expressing TIN2ΔTPP1 instead of wild-type TIN2 phenocopy the POT1a,b knockout setting without showing additional phenotypes. Therefore, these results are consistent with TIN2 being the only mechanism by which TPP1/POT1 heterodimers bind to shelterin and function in telomere protection.     

Telomere Protection by TPP1 Is Mediated by POT1a and POT1b

Mammalian telomeres are protected by the shelterin complex, which contains single-stranded telomeric DNA binding proteins (POT1a and POT1b in rodents, POT1 in other mammals). Mouse POT1a prevents the activation of the ATR kinase and contributes to the repression of the nonhomologous end-joining pathway (NHEJ) at newly replicated telomeres. POT1b represses unscheduled resection of the 5′-ended telomeric DNA strand, resulting in long 3′ overhangs in POT1b KO cells. Both POT1 proteins bind TPP1, forming heterodimers that bind to other proteins in shelterin. Short hairpin RNA (shRNA)-mediated depletion had previously demonstrated that TPP1 contributes to the normal function of POT1a and POT1b. However, these experiments did not establish whether TPP1 has additional functions in shelterin. Here we report on the phenotypes of the conditional deletion of TPP1 from mouse embryo fibroblasts. TPP1 deletion resulted in the release of POT1a and POT1b from chromatin and loss of these proteins from telomeres, indicating that TPP1 is required for the telomere association of POT1a and POT1b but not for their stability. The telomere dysfunction phenotypes associated with deletion of TPP1 were identical to those of POT1a/POT1b DKO cells. No additional telomere dysfunction phenotypes were observed, establishing that the main role of TPP1 is to allow POT1a and POT1b to protect chromosome ends.Mammalian cells solve the chromosome end protection problem through the binding of shelterin to the telomeric TTAGGG repeat arrays at chromosome ends (5). Shelterin contains two double-stranded telomeric DNA binding proteins, TRF1 and TRF2, which both interact with the shelterin subunit TIN2. These three shelterin components, as well as the TRF2 interacting factor Rap1, are abundant, potentially covering the majority of the TTAGGG repeat sequences at chromosome ends (30). TIN2 interacts with the less abundant TPP1/POT1 heterodimers and is thought to facilitate the recruitment of the single-stranded telomeric DNA binding proteins to telomeres (15, 21, 35).Shelterin represses the four major pathways that threaten mammalian telomeres (6). It prevents activation of the ATM and ATR kinases, which can induce cell cycle arrest in response to double-strand breaks (DSBs). Shelterin also blocks the two major repair pathways that act on DSBs: nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) and homology-directed repair (HDR). Removal of individual components of shelterin leads to highly specific telomere dysfunction phenotypes, allowing assignment of shelterin functions to each of its components.The POT1 proteins are critical for the repression of ATR signaling (20). Concurrent deletion of POT1a and POT1b from mouse embryo fibroblasts (POT1a/b DKO cells [12]) activates the ATR kinase at most telomeres, presumably because the single-stranded telomeric DNA is exposed to RPA. POT1a/b DKO cells also have a defect in the structure of the telomere terminus, showing extended 3′ overhangs that are thought to be due to excessive resection of the 5′-ended strand in the absence of POT1b (11-13). The combination of these two phenotypes, activation of the ATR kinase and excess single-stranded telomeric DNA, is not observed when either TRF1 or TRF2 is deleted.In contrast to the activation of ATR signaling in POT1a/b DKO cells, TRF2 deletion results in activation of the ATM kinase at telomeres (3, 16, 20). In addition, TRF2-deficient cells show widespread NHEJ-mediated telomere-telomere fusions (3, 31). This phenotype is readily distinguished from the consequences of POT1a/b loss. POT1a/b DKO cells have a minor telomere fusion phenotype that primarily manifests after DNA replication, resulting in the fusion of sister telomeres (12). In TRF2-deficient cells, most telomere fusions take place in G₁ (18), resulting in chromosome-type telomere fusions in the subsequent metaphase. Chromosome-type fusions also occur in the POT1a/b DKO setting, but they are matched in frequency by sister telomere fusions.The type of telomere dysfunction induced by TRF1 loss is also distinct. Deletion of TRF1 gives rise to DNA replication problems at telomeres that activate the ATR kinase in S phase and leads to aberrant telomere structures in metaphase (referred to as “fragile telomeres”) (28). This fragile telomere phenotype is not observed upon deletion of POT1a and POT1b, and the activation of the ATR kinase at telomeres in POT1a/b DKO cells is not dependent on the progression through S phase (Y. Gong and T. de Lange, unpublished data). Furthermore, deletion of TRF1 does not induce excess single-stranded DNA.These phenotypic distinctions bear witness to the separation of functions within shelterin and also serve as a guide to understanding the contribution of the other shelterin proteins, including TPP1. TPP1 is an oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide-binding fold (OB fold) protein in shelterin that forms a heterodimer with POT1 (32). TPP1 and POT1 are distantly related to the TEBPα/β heterodimer, which is bound to telomeric termini of certain ciliates (2, 32, 33). Several lines of evidence indicate that TPP1 mediates the recruitment of POT1 to telomeres. Mammalian TPP1 was discovered based on its interaction with TIN2, and diminished TPP1 levels affect the ability of POT1 to bind to telomeres and protect chromosome ends (14, 15, 21, 26, 33, 35). Since TPP1 enhances the in vitro DNA binding activity of POT1 (32), it might mediate the recruitment of POT1 through improving its interaction with the single-stranded telomeric DNA. However, POT1 does not require its DNA binding domain for telomere recruitment, although this domain is critical for telomere protection (23, 26). Thus, it is more likely that the TPP1-TIN2 interaction mediates the binding of POT1 to telomeres. However, POT1 has also been shown to bind to TRF2 in vitro, and this interaction has been suggested to constitute a second mechanism for the recruitment of POT1 to telomeres (1, 34).TPP1 has been suggested to have additional functions at telomeres. Biochemical data showed that TPP1 promotes the interaction between TIN2, TRF1, and TRF2 (4, 25). Therefore, it was suggested that TPP1 plays an essential organizing function in shelterin, predicting that its deletion would affect TRF1 and TRF2 (25). Furthermore, cytogenetic data on cells from the adrenocortical dysplasia (Acd) mouse strain, which carries a hypomorphic mutation for TPP1 (14), revealed complex chromosomal rearrangements in addition to telomere fusions, leading to the suggestion that TPP1 might have additional telomeric or nontelomeric functions (9).In order to determine the role of TPP1 at telomeres and possibly elsewhere in the genome, we generated a conditional knockout setting in mouse embryo fibroblasts. The results indicate that the main function of TPP1 is to ensure the protection of telomeres by POT1 proteins. Each of the phenotypes of TPP1 loss was also observed in the POT1a/b DKO cells. No evidence was found for a role of TPP1 in stabilizing or promoting the function of other components of shelterin. Furthermore, the results argue against a TPP1-independent mode of telomeric recruitment of POT1.     

Human Telomere Repeat Binding Factor TRF1 Replaces TRF2 Bound to Shelterin Core Hub TIN2 when TPP1 Is Absent

Human telomeric repeat binding factors TRF1 and TRF2 along with TIN2 form the core of the shelterin complex that protects chromosome ends against unwanted end-joining and DNA repair. We applied a single-molecule approach to assess TRF1–TIN2–TRF2 complex formation in solution at physiological conditions. Fluorescence cross-correlation spectroscopy was used to describe the complex assembly by analyzing how coincident fluctuations of differently labeled TRF1 and TRF2 correlate when they move together through the confocal volume of the microscope. We observed, at the single-molecule level, that TRF1 effectively substitutes TRF2 on TIN2. We assessed also the effect of another telomeric factor TPP1 that recruits telomerase to telomeres. We found that TPP1 upon binding to TIN2 induces changes that expand TIN2 binding capacity, such that TIN2 can accommodate both TRF1 and TRF2 simultaneously. We suggest a molecular model that explains why TPP1 is essential for the stable formation of TRF1–TIN2–TRF2 core complex.     

Telomere protection by mammalian Pot1 requires interaction with Tpp1

The shelterin complex at mammalian telomeres contains the single-stranded DNA-binding protein Pot1, which regulates telomere length and protects chromosome ends. Pot1 binds Tpp1, the shelterin component that connects Pot1 to the duplex telomeric DNA-binding proteins Trf1 and Trf2. Control of telomere length requires that Pot1 binds Tpp1 as well as the single-stranded telomeric DNA, but it is not known whether the protective function of Pot1 depends on Tpp1. Alternatively, Pot1 might function similarly to the Pot1-like proteins of budding and fission yeast, which have no known Tpp1-like connection to the duplex telomeric DNA. Using mutant mouse cells with diminished Tpp1 levels, RNA interference directed to mouse Tpp1 and Pot1, and complementation of mouse Pot1 knockout cells with human and mouse Pot1 variants, we show here that Tpp1 is required for the protective function of mammalian Pot1 proteins.     

Active and Passive Destabilization of G-Quadruplex DNA by the Telomere POT1-TPP1 Complex

Chromosome ends are protected by guanosine-rich telomere DNA that forms stable G-quadruplex (G4) structures. The heterodimeric POT1-TPP1 complex interacts specifically with telomere DNA to shield it from illicit DNA damage repair and to resolve secondary structure that impedes telomere extension. The mechanism by which POT1-TPP1 accomplishes these tasks is poorly understood. Here, we establish the kinetic framework for POT1-TPP1 binding and unfolding of telomere G4 DNA. Our data identify two modes of POT1-TPP1 destabilization of G4 DNA that are governed by protein concentration. At low concentrations, POT1-TPP1 passively captures transiently unfolded G4s. At higher concentrations, POT1-TPP1 proteins bind to G4s to actively destabilize the DNA structures. Cancer-associated POT1-TPP1 mutations impair multiple reaction steps in this process, resulting in less efficient destabilization of G4 structures. The mechanistic insight highlights the importance of cell cycle dependent expression and localization of the POT1-TPP1 complex and distinguishes diverse functions of this complex in telomere maintenance.     

Coordinated Interactions of Multiple POT1-TPP1 Proteins with Telomere DNA

Telomeres are macromolecular nucleoprotein complexes that protect the ends of eukaryotic chromosomes from degradation, end-to-end fusion events, and from engaging the DNA damage response. However, the assembly of this essential DNA-protein complex is poorly understood. Telomere DNA consists of the repeated double-stranded sequence 5′-TTAGGG-3′ in vertebrates, followed by a single-stranded DNA overhang with the same sequence. Both double- and single-stranded regions are coated with high specificity by telomere end-binding proteins, including POT1 and TPP1, that bind as a heterodimer to single-stranded telomeric DNA. Multiple POT1-TPP1 proteins must fully coat the single-stranded telomere DNA to form a functional telomere. To better understand the mechanism of multiple binding, we mutated or deleted the two guanosine nucleotides residing between adjacent POT1-TPP1 recognition sites in single-stranded telomere DNA that are not required for multiple POT1-TPP1 binding events. Circular dichroism demonstrated that spectra from the native telomere sequence are characteristic of a G-quadruplex secondary structure, whereas the altered telomere sequences were devoid of these signatures. The altered telomere strands, however, facilitated more cooperative loading of multiple POT1-TPP1 proteins compared with the wild-type telomere sequence. Finally, we show that a 48-nucleotide DNA with a telomere sequence is more susceptible to nuclease digestion when coated with POT1-TPP1 proteins than when it is left uncoated. Together, these data suggest that POT1-TPP1 binds telomeric DNA in a coordinated manner to facilitate assembly of the nucleoprotein complexes into a state that is more accessible to enzymatic activity.     

POT1–TPP1 enhances telomerase processivity by slowing primer dissociation and aiding translocation

Telomerase contributes to chromosome end replication by synthesizing repeats of telomeric DNA, and the telomeric DNA‐binding proteins protection of telomeres (POT1) and TPP1 synergistically increase its repeat addition processivity. To understand the mechanism of increased processivity, we measured the effect of POT1–TPP1 on individual steps in the telomerase reaction cycle. Under conditions where telomerase was actively synthesizing DNA, POT1–TPP1 bound to the primer decreased primer dissociation rate. In addition, POT1–TPP1 increased the translocation efficiency. A template‐mutant telomerase that synthesizes DNA that cannot be bound by POT1–TPP1 exhibited increased processivity only when the primer contained at least one POT1–TPP1‐binding site, so a single POT1–TPP1–DNA interaction is necessary and sufficient for stimulating processivity. The POT1–TPP1 effect is specific, as another single‐stranded DNA‐binding protein, gp32, cannot substitute. POT1–TPP1 increased processivity even when substoichiometric relative to the DNA, providing evidence for a recruitment function. These results support a model in which POT1–TPP1 enhances telomerase processivity in a manner markedly different from the sliding clamps used by DNA polymerases.     

Telomere proteins POT1, TRF1 and TRF2 augment long-patch base excision repair in vitro

Human telomeres consist of multiple tandem hexameric repeats, each containing a guanine triplet. Guanosine-rich clusters are highly susceptible to oxidative base damage, necessitating base excision repair (BER). Previous demonstration of enhanced strand displacement synthesis by the BER component DNA polymerase β in the presence of telomere protein TRF2 suggests that telomeres employ long-patch (LP) BER. Earlier analyses in vitro showed that efficiency of BER reactions is reduced in the DNA-histone environment of chromatin. Evidence presented here indicates that BER is promoted at telomeres. We found that the three proteins that contact telomere DNA, POT1, TRF1 and TRF2, enhance the rate of individual steps of LP-BER and stimulate the complete reconstituted LP-BER pathway. Thought to protect telomere DNA from degradation, these proteins still apparently evolved to allow selective access of repair proteins.     

Telomere proteins POT1, TRF1 and TRF2 augment long-patch base excision repair in vitro

Human telomeres consist of multiple tandem hexameric repeats, each containing a guanine triplet. Guanosine-rich clusters are highly susceptible to oxidative base damage, necessitating base excision repair (BER). Previous demonstration of enhanced strand displacement synthesis by the BER component DNA polymerase β in the presence of telomere protein TRF2 suggests that telomeres employ long-patch (LP) BER. Earlier analyses in vitro showed that efficiency of BER reactions is reduced in the DNA-histone environment of chromatin. Evidence presented here indicates that BER is promoted at telomeres. We found that the three proteins that contact telomere DNA, POT1, TRF1 and TRF2, enhance the rate of individual steps of LP-BER and stimulate the complete reconstituted LP-BER pathway. Thought to protect telomere DNA from degradation, these proteins still apparently evolved to allow selective access of repair proteins.Key words: telomeres, base excision repair, shelterin complex, oxidative damage, LP-BER     

Telomere-Binding Protein TPP1 Modulates Telomere Homeostasis and Confers Radioresistance to Human Colorectal Cancer Cells

Background

Radiotherapy is one of the major therapeutic strategies in cancer treatment. The telomere-binding protein TPP1 is an important component of the shelterin complex at mammalian telomeres. Our previous reports showed that TPP1 expression was elevated in radioresistant cells, but the exact effects and mechanisms of TPP1 on radiosensitivity is unclear.

Principal Findings

In this study, we found that elevated TPP1 expression significantly correlated with radioresistance and longer telomere length in human colorectal cancer cell lines. Moreover, TPP1 overexpression showed lengthened telomere length and a significant decrease of radiosensitivity to X-rays. TPP1 mediated radioresistance was correlated with a decreased apoptosis rate after IR exposure. Furthermore, TPP1 overexpression showed prolonged G2/M arrest mediated by ATM/ATR-Chk1 signal pathway after IR exposure. Moreover, TPP1 overexpression accelerated the repair kinetics of total DNA damage and telomere dysfunction induced by ionizing radiation.

Conclusions

We demonstrated that elevated expressions of TPP1 in human colorectal cancer cells could protect telomere from DNA damage and confer radioresistance. These results suggested that TPP1 may be a potential target in the radiotherapy of colorectal cancer.     

Akt regulates TPP1 homodimerization and telomere protection

Telomeres are specialized structures at the ends of eukaryotic chromosomes that are important for maintaining genome stability and integrity. Telomere dysfunction has been linked to aging and cancer development. In mammalian cells, extensive studies have been carried out to illustrate how core telomeric proteins assemble on telomeres to recruit the telomerase and additional factors for telomere maintenance and protection. In comparison, how changes in growth signaling pathways impact telomeres and telomere‐binding proteins remains largely unexplored. The phosphatidylinositol 3‐kinase (PI3‐K)/Akt (also known as PKB) pathway, one of the best characterized growth signaling cascades, regulates a variety of cellular function including cell proliferation, survival, metabolism, and DNA repair, and dysregulation of PI3‐K/Akt signaling has been linked to aging and diseases such as cancer and diabetes. In this study, we provide evidence that the Akt signaling pathway plays an important role in telomere protection. Akt inhibition either by chemical inhibitors or small interfering RNAs induced telomere dysfunction. Furthermore, we found that TPP1 could homodimerize through its OB‐fold, a process that was dependent on the Akt kinase. Telomere damage and reduced TPP1 dimerization as a result of Akt inhibition was also accompanied by diminished recruitment of TPP1 and POT1 to the telomeres. Our findings highlight a previously unknown link between Akt signaling and telomere protection.     

Yeast homotypic vacuole fusion requires the Ccz1-Mon1 complex during the tethering/docking stage

The function of the yeast lysosome/vacuole is critically linked with the morphology of the organelle. Accordingly, highly regulated processes control vacuolar fission and fusion events. Analysis of homotypic vacuole fusion demonstrated that vacuoles from strains defective in the CCZ1 and MON1 genes could not fuse. Morphological evidence suggested that these mutant vacuoles could not proceed to the tethering/docking stage. Ccz1 and Mon1 form a stable protein complex that binds the vacuole membrane. In the absence of the Ccz1-Mon1 complex, the integrity of vacuole SNARE pairing and the unpaired SNARE class C Vps/HOPS complex interaction were both impaired. The Ccz1-Mon1 complex colocalized with other fusion components on the vacuole as part of the cis-SNARE complex, and the association of the Ccz1-Mon1 complex with the vacuole appeared to be regulated by the class C Vps/HOPS complex proteins. Accordingly, we propose that the Ccz1-Mon1 complex is critical for the Ypt7-dependent tethering/docking stage leading to the formation of a trans-SNARE complex and subsequent vacuole fusion.     

Telomere maintenance in fission yeast requires an Est1 ortholog

Telomerase regulation is critical to genome maintenance yet remains poorly understood. Without telomerase's ability to synthesize telomere repeats, chromosome ends shorten progressively, as conventional DNA polymerases cannot fully replicate the ends of linear molecules. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, telomerase activity in vivo absolutely depends on a set of telomerase accessory proteins that includes Est1p, which appears to recruit or activate telomerase at the site of polymerization. Thus, est1Delta cells have the same cellular senescence phenotype as cells lacking either the catalytic protein subunit of telomerase or its template-containing RNA subunit. While the telomerase protein is highly conserved among eukaryotes, the apparent lack of Est1p homologs has frustrated efforts to describe a common mechanism of telomerase recruitment and activation. Here, we describe SpEst1p, a homolog of Est1p from the evolutionarily distant Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Like ScEst1p, SpEst1p is required for telomerase activity in vivo. Coupled with the identification of an orthologous Est1 protein in humans [10], this suggests a much wider conservation of telomerase regulation than was previously known. Strikingly, in cells with compromised telomere function (taz1Delta), SpEst1p loss confers a lethal germination phenotype, while telomerase loss does not, indicating that SpEst1p plays an unexpected additional role in chromosome end protection.     

Telomere dysfunction and cell survival: roles for distinct TIN2-containing complexes

Telomeres are maintained by three DNA-binding proteins (telomeric repeat binding factor 1 [TRF1], TRF2, and protector of telomeres 1 [POT1]) and several associated factors. One factor, TRF1-interacting protein 2 (TIN2), binds TRF1 and TRF2 directly and POT1 indirectly. Along with two other proteins, TPP1 and hRap1, these form a soluble complex that may be the core telomere maintenance complex. It is not clear whether subcomplexes also exist in vivo. We provide evidence for two TIN2 subcomplexes with distinct functions in human cells. We isolated these two TIN2 subcomplexes from nuclear lysates of unperturbed cells and cells expressing TIN2 mutants TIN2-13 and TIN2-15C, which cannot bind TRF2 or TRF1, respectively. In cells with wild-type p53 function, TIN2-15C was more potent than TIN2-13 in causing telomere uncapping and eventual growth arrest. In cells lacking p53 function, TIN2-15C was more potent than TIN2-13 in causing telomere dysfunction and cell death. Our findings suggest that distinct TIN2 complexes exist and that TIN2-15C-sensitive subcomplexes are particularly important for cell survival in the absence of functional p53.     

Telomere capping in non-dividing yeast cells requires Yku and Rap1

The assembly of a protective cap onto the telomeres of eukaryotic chromosomes suppresses genomic instability through inhibition of DNA repair activities that normally process accidental DNA breaks. We show here that the essential Cdc13–Stn1–Ten1 complex is entirely dispensable for telomere protection in non‐dividing cells. However, Yku and Rap1 become crucially important for this function in these cells. After inactivation of Yku70 in G1‐arrested cells, moderate but significant telomere degradation occurs. As the activity of cyclin‐dependent kinases (CDK) promotes degradation, these results suggest that Yku stabilizes G1 telomeres by blocking the access of CDK1‐independent nucleases to telomeres. The results indeed show that both Exo1 and the Mre11/Rad50/Xrs2 complex are required for telomeric resection after Yku loss in non‐dividing cells. Unexpectedly, both asynchronously growing and quiescent G0 cells lacking Rap1 display readily detectable telomere degradation, suggesting an earlier unanticipated function for this protein in suppression of nuclease activities at telomeres. Together, our results show a high flexibility of the telomeric cap and suggest that distinct configurations may provide for efficient capping in dividing versus non‐dividing cells.