Functional Analysis of the Hsp93/ClpC Chaperone at the Chloroplast Envelope

The Hsp100-type chaperone Hsp93/ClpC has crucial roles in chloroplast biogenesis. In addition to its role in proteolysis in the stroma, biochemical and genetic evidence led to the hypothesis that this chaperone collaborates with the inner envelope TIC complex to power preprotein import. Recently, it was suggested that Hsp93, working together with the Clp proteolytic core, can confer a protein quality control mechanism at the envelope. Thus, the role of envelope-localized Hsp93, and the mechanism by which it participates in protein import, remain unclear. To analyze the function of Hsp93 in protein import independently of its ClpP association, we created a mutant of Hsp93 affecting its ClpP-binding motif (PBM) (Hsp93[P-]), which is essential for the chaperone’s interaction with the Clp proteolytic core. The Hsp93[P-] construct was ineffective at complementing the pale-yellow phenotype of hsp93 Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) mutants, indicating that the PBM is essential for Hsp93 function. As expected, the PBM mutation negatively affected the degradation activity of the stromal Clp protease. The mutation also disrupted association of Hsp93 with the Clp proteolytic core at the envelope, without affecting the envelope localization of Hsp93 itself or its association with the TIC machinery, which we demonstrate to be mediated by a direct interaction with Tic110. Nonetheless, Hsp93[P-] expression did not detectably improve the protein import efficiency of hsp93 mutant chloroplasts. Thus, our results do not support the proposed function of Hsp93 in protein import propulsion, but are more consistent with the notion of Hsp93 performing a quality control role at the point of import.Chloroplasts are essential organelles in plant cells as they are responsible for performing a variety of functions (Jarvis and López-Juez, 2013). Although chloroplasts have their own genome (encoding approximately 100 proteins), the majority of the proteins found in these organelles are nucleus-encoded (approximately 3,000) (Leister, 2003), synthesized in the cytosol, and imported into the chloroplast as precursor proteins (preproteins), each one with a cleavable N-terminal extension or transit peptide (Shi and Theg, 2013a; Paila et al., 2015). The preprotein import mechanism is initiated by the interaction of the transit peptide with the translocon at the outer envelope membrane of chloroplasts (TOC) complex and subsequently involves transport through the translocon at the inner envelope membrane of chloroplasts (TIC) machinery in an energy-dependent process (Theg et al., 1989; Shi and Theg, 2013b). The Tic110 and Tic40 components have long been described as central TIC components, but these proteins were absent from a recently described 1-MD TIC complex (consisting of Tic20, Tic56, Tic100, and Tic214; Kovács-Bogdan et al., 2010; Nakai, 2015). One possible explanation is that two TIC complexes act sequentially during protein import (e.g. a Tic110-containing complex may act downstream of the 1-MD complex). A TIC complex associated import motor is proposed to exist at the stromal side of the inner envelope, and several stromal chaperones, including Hsp93/ClpC and Hsp70, have been proposed to act as motors to drive protein translocation into the stroma (for review, see Flores-Pérez and Jarvis, 2013).Hsp93 is closely related to bacterial ClpC and is a member of the Class I subfamily of Hsp100 chaperones, which themselves belong to the wider AAA+ (ATPases associated with various cellular activities) superfamily (Hanson and Whiteheart, 2005; Flores-Pérez and Jarvis, 2013). AAA+ enzymes are involved in a variety of cellular processes, such as protein folding, unfolding for proteolysis, and disassembly of protein aggregates or protein complexes. Although AAA+ chaperones are well characterized in bacteria, they are found in all kingdoms (Hanson and Whiteheart, 2005). Such proteins possess one or two nucleotide binding domains, both of which contain conserved Walker A and B motifs. These chaperones may also contain a conserved ClpP-binding motif (PBM), or P-loop, which is essential for interaction with the unrelated, proteolytic ClpP subunit (Weibezahn et al., 2004; Hanson and Whiteheart, 2005).In the chloroplast, Hsp93/ClpC partitions between the inner envelope membrane and the chloroplast stroma. Most Hsp93/ClpC protein is located in the stroma. Nonetheless, a large proportion of the total chloroplast Hsp93/ClpC pool (30%) associates with the envelope (Sjögren et al., 2014). Hsp93 has frequently been copurified with TIC and TOC complex components, which led to the hypothesis that it provides the driving force for preprotein import (Akita et al., 1997; Nielsen et al., 1997). Also, Hsp93 was found to specifically coimmunoprecipitate with preproteins under limiting ATP conditions and to stably bind to transit peptides in vitro (Nielsen et al., 1997; Rosano et al., 2011). Genetic and molecular studies have suggested that it functions in close association with Tic110 and Tic40 (Chou et al., 2003; Kovacheva et al., 2005; Chou et al., 2006). More recently, it was shown that the N-terminal domain of Hsp93 is important for its membrane association (Chu and Li, 2012). Despite all this evidence, the nature of the interaction between Hsp93 and the TIC apparatus has not been fully characterized.Analysis of mutants also supported the involvement of the Hsp93 chaperone in protein import. In Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), two homologous genes, atHSP93-V (CLPC1) and atHSP93-III (CLPC2), code for Hsp93/ClpC, and the resulting protein isoforms share 91% amino acid sequence identity (Kovacheva et al., 2007). The Hsp93-V protein is the most abundant isoform, and mutations in the atHSP93-V gene lead to a pale-green plant phenotype with protein import defective chloroplasts. In contrast, atHSP93-III knockout plants are indistinguishable from the wild type, most likely due to the compensatory presence of functionally redundant and abundant atHsp93-V (Kovacheva et al., 2005, 2007). Complete loss of both proteins in Arabidopsis is lethal during embryo development, whereas double mutants lacking Hsp93-V but retaining partial Hsp93-III activity are viable but exhibit severe chlorosis and protein import defects (Kovacheva et al., 2007).More typically, as expected by its close relationship to bacterial orthologs, Hsp93/ClpC is a functional component of the caseinolytic protease (Clp) in the chloroplast stroma, where it recognizes and unfolds substrates for degradation (Shanklin et al., 1995). Significantly, the Clp proteolytic core is also bound to the envelope membranes, in quantities which are sufficient to bind to all of the similarly localized Hsp93/ClpC (Sjögren et al., 2014). This recent finding suggested a role for the Clp protease in protein quality control at the envelope. The structure of the Clp protease complex comprises a cylinder-like protease core and an AAA+ chaperone ring complex, and it is generally conserved throughout evolution (Nishimura and van Wijk, 2015). In Arabidopsis, the plastid Clp proteolytic core contains two distinct heptameric rings (the P-ring consisting of ClpP3-P6 and the R-ring consisting of ClpP1 and ClpR1-R4; Sjögren et al., 2006), and attached to this are accessory ClpT proteins involved in core assembly (Sjögren and Clarke, 2011). Several studies have shown that deficiency of the proteolytic subunits of the core complex leads to sick plant phenotypes (Sjögren et al., 2004; Rudella et al., 2006; Sjögren et al., 2006), highlighting the essential nature of Clp proteolytic activity to chloroplast function and plant viability.As described above, the putative interacting partners of Hsp93 at the envelope are Tic110 and Tic40. Tic110 is a highly abundant protein and is essential for plastid biogenesis (Inaba et al., 2005; Kovacheva et al., 2007). It has two N-terminal transmembrane α-helices, and it projects a large C-terminal hydrophilic domain into the stroma (Jackson et al., 1998; Inaba et al., 2003). A stromal region proximal to the second transmembrane helix selectively associates with transit peptides, serving as a docking site for preproteins as they emerge from the TIC channel (Inaba et al., 2003). The hydrophilic domain of algal Tic110 possesses a rod-shaped helix-repeat structure similar to HEAT-repeat domains (and plant Tic110 proteins are predicted to be similar), and these typically function as scaffolds for protein-protein interactions (Tsai et al., 2013). Tic40 is topologically similar to Tic110 and is proposed to act as a cochaperone in the preprotein import motor (Chou et al., 2003). In the corresponding model, a transit peptide emerging from the TIC channel binds to the stromal domain of Tic110; this binding causes a conformational change of Tic110 to recruit Tic40, which in turn triggers transit peptide release to enable association of the preprotein with Hsp93 (Inaba et al., 2003; Chou et al., 2006). Finally, Tic40 is proposed to stimulate ATP hydrolysis by Hsp93 so that the chaperone pulls the preprotein into the stroma (Chou et al., 2006).Although there is good evidence that Hsp93 is involved in protein import, the ability of Hsp93 to associate with the Clp protease core means that, in principle, any aspect of the hsp93 mutant phenotype could be due to disruption of the ClpP-linked functions of the protein. Bearing this in mind, we aimed to further characterize the role of Hsp93 at the inner envelope membrane. First, we analyzed the putative interactions of Hsp93 with the TIC components, Tic110 and Tic40, in a complementary set of in vitro and in vivo studies. Second, we evaluated the proposed role of Hsp93 in protein import independently of its role in proteolysis by creating a PBM mutant of the major Hsp93 isoform, atHsp93-V, and studying its activity in planta.     

Discovery of a Unique Clp Component,ClpF, in Chloroplasts: A Proposed Binary ClpF-ClpS1 Adaptor Complex Functions in Substrate Recognition and Delivery

Clp proteases are found in prokaryotes, mitochondria, and plastids where they play crucial roles in maintaining protein homeostasis (proteostasis). The plant plastid Clp machinery comprises a hetero-oligomeric ClpPRT proteolytic core, ATP-dependent chaperones ClpC and ClpD, and an adaptor protein, ClpS1. ClpS1 selects substrates to the ClpPR protease-ClpC chaperone complex for degradation, but the underlying substrate recognition and delivery mechanisms are currently unclear. Here, we characterize a ClpS1-interacting protein in Arabidopsis thaliana, ClpF, which can interact with the Clp substrate glutamyl-tRNA reductase. ClpF and ClpS1 mutually stimulate their association with ClpC. ClpF, which is only found in photosynthetic eukaryotes, contains bacterial uvrB/C and YccV protein domains and a unique N-terminal domain. We propose a testable model in which ClpS1 and ClpF form a binary adaptor for selective substrate recognition and delivery to ClpC, reflecting an evolutionary adaptation of the Clp system to the plastid proteome.     

Distinctive types of ATP-dependent Clp proteases in cyanobacteria

Cyanobacteria are the only prokaryotes that perform oxygenic photosynthesis and are thought to be ancestors to plant chloroplasts. Like chloroplasts, cyanobacteria possess a diverse array of proteolytic enzymes, with one of the most prominent being the ATP-dependent Ser-type Clp protease. The model Clp protease in Escherichia coli consists of a single ClpP proteolytic core flanked on one or both ends by a HSP100 chaperone partner. In comparison, cyanobacteria have multiple ClpP paralogs plus a ClpP variant (ClpR), which lacks the catalytic triad typical of Ser-type proteases. In this study, we reveal that two distinct soluble Clp proteases exist in the unicellular cyanobacterium Synechococcus elongatus. Each protease consists of a unique proteolytic core comprised of two separate Clp subunits, one with ClpP1 and ClpP2, the other with ClpP3 and ClpR. Each core also associates with a particular HSP100 chaperone partner, ClpC in the case of the ClpP3/R core, and ClpX for the ClpP1/P2 core. The two adaptor proteins, ClpS1 and ClpS2 also interact with the ClpC chaperone protein, likely increasing the range of protein substrates targeted by the Clp protease in cyanobacteria. We also reveal the possible existence of a third Clp protease in Synechococcus, one which associates with the internal membrane network. Altogether, we show that presence of several distinctive Clp proteases in cyanobacteria, a feature which contrasts from that in most other organisms.     

ATP-dependent association between subunits of Clp protease in pea chloroplasts

The chloroplast ATP-dependent Clp protease (EC 3.4.21.92) is composed of the proteolytic subunit ClpP and the regulatory ATPase, ClpC. Although both subunits are found in the stroma, the interaction between the two is dynamic. When immunoprecipitation with antibodies against ClpC was performed on stroma from dark-adapted pea (Pisum sativum L. cv. Alaska) chloroplasts, ClpC but not ClpP was precipitated. However, when stroma was supplemented with ATP, both ClpC and ClpP were precipitated. Co-immunoprecipitation was even more efficient in the presence of ATP-gamma-S, suggesting that the association between regulatory and proteolytic subunits is dependent on binding of ATP to ClpC, but not its hydrolysis. To further test this association, stroma was fractionated by column chromatography, and the presence of Clp subunits in the different fractions was monitored immunologically. When stroma depleted of ATP was fractionated on an ion-exchange column, ClpP and ClpC migrated separately, whereas in the presence of ATP-gamma-S both subunits co-migrated. Similar results were observed in size-exclusion chromatography. To further characterize the precipitated enzyme, its proteolytic activity was assayed by testing its ability to degrade beta-casein. No degradation was observed in the absence of ATP, and degradation was inhibited in the presence of phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, consistent with Clp being an ATP-dependent serine protease. The activity of the isolated enzyme was further tested using chimeric OE33 as a model substrate. This protein was also degraded in an ATP-dependent manner, supporting the suggested role of Clp protease as a major housekeeping protease in the stroma.     

Identification of new protein substrates for the chloroplast ATP-dependent Clp protease supports its constitutive role in Arabidopsis

The ATP-dependent Clp protease in plant chloroplasts consists of a heterogeneous proteolytic core containing multiple ClpP and ClpR paralogues. In this study, we have examined in detail the only viable knockout mutant to date of one of these subunits in Arabidopsis thaliana, ClpR1. Loss of ClpR1 caused a slow-growth phenotype, with chlorotic leaves during early development that later partially recovered upon maturity. Analysis of the Clp proteolytic core in the clpR1 mutant (clpR1-1) revealed approx. 10% of the wild-type levels remaining, probably due to a relative increase in the closely related ClpR3 protein and its partial substitution of ClpR1 in the core complex. A proteomic approach using an in organello proteolytic assay revealed 19 new potential substrates for the chloroplast Clp protease. Many of these substrates were constitutive enzymes involved in different metabolic pathways, including photosynthetic carbon fixation, nitrogen metabolism and chlorophyll/haem biosynthesis, whereas others function in housekeeping roles such as RNA maturation, protein synthesis and maturation, and recycling processes. In contrast, degradation of the stress-related chloroplast proteins Hsp21 (heat-shock protein 21) and lipoxygenase 2 was unaffected in the clpR1-1 line and thus not facilitated by the Clp protease. Overall, we show that the chloroplast Clp protease is principally a constitutive enzyme that degrades numerous stromal proteins, a feature that almost certainly underlies its vital importance for chloroplast function and plant viability.     

Structural and functional insights into the chloroplast ATP-dependent Clp protease in Arabidopsis

In contrast with the model Escherichia coli Clp protease, the ATP-dependent Clp protease in higher plants has a remarkably diverse proteolytic core consisting of multiple ClpP and ClpR paralogs, presumably arranged within a dual heptameric ring structure. Using antisense lines for the nucleus-encoded ClpP subunit, ClpP6, we show that the Arabidopsis thaliana Clp protease is vital for chloroplast development and function. Repression of ClpP6 produced a proportional decrease in the Clp proteolytic core, causing a chlorotic phenotype in young leaves that lessened upon maturity. Structural analysis of the proteolytic core revealed two distinct subcomplexes that likely correspond to single heptameric rings, one containing the ClpP1 and ClpR1-4 proteins, the other containing ClpP3-6. Proteomic analysis revealed several stromal proteins more abundant in clpP6 antisense lines, suggesting that some are substrates for the Clp protease. A proteolytic assay developed for intact chloroplasts identified potential substrates for the stromal Clp protease in higher plants, most of which were more abundant in young Arabidopsis leaves, consistent with the severity of the chlorotic phenotype observed in the clpP6 antisense lines. The identified substrates all function in more general housekeeping roles such as plastid protein synthesis, folding, and quality control, rather than in metabolic activities such as photosynthesis.     

Interaction specificity between the chaperone and proteolytic components of the cyanobacterial Clp protease

The Clp protease is conserved among eubacteria and most eukaryotes, and uses ATP to drive protein substrate unfolding and translocation into a chamber of sequestered proteolytic active sites. In plant chloroplasts and cyanobacteria, the essential constitutive Clp protease consists of the Hsp100/ClpC chaperone partnering a proteolytic core of catalytic ClpP and noncatalytic ClpR subunits. In the present study, we have examined putative determinants conferring the highly specific association between ClpC and the ClpP3/R core from the model cyanobacterium Synechococcus elongatus. Two conserved sequences in the N-terminus of ClpR (tyrosine and proline motifs) and one in the N-terminus of ClpP3 (MPIG motif) were identified as being crucial for the ClpC-ClpP3/R association. These N-terminal domains also influence the stability of the ClpP3/R core complex itself. A unique C-terminal sequence was also found in plant and cyanobacterial ClpC orthologues just downstream of the P-loop region previously shown in Escherichia coli to be important for Hsp100 association to ClpP. This R motif in Synechococcus ClpC confers specificity for the ClpP3/R core and prevents association with E. coli ClpP; its removal from ClpC reverses this core specificity.     

The Mycobacterium tuberculosis ClpP1P2 Protease Interacts Asymmetrically with Its ATPase Partners ClpX and ClpC1

Clp chaperone-proteases are cylindrical complexes built from ATP-dependent chaperone rings that stack onto a proteolytic ClpP double-ring core to carry out substrate protein degradation. Interaction of the ClpP particle with the chaperone is mediated by an N-terminal loop and a hydrophobic surface patch on the ClpP ring surface. In contrast to E. coli, Mycobacterium tuberculosis harbors not only one but two ClpP protease subunits, ClpP1 and ClpP2, and a homo-heptameric ring of each assembles to form the ClpP1P2 double-ring core. Consequently, this hetero double-ring presents two different potential binding surfaces for the interaction with the chaperones ClpX and ClpC1. To investigate whether ClpX or ClpC1 might preferentially interact with one or the other double-ring face, we mutated the hydrophobic chaperone-interaction patch on either ClpP1 or ClpP2, generating ClpP1P2 particles that are defective in one of the two binding patches and thereby in their ability to interact with their chaperone partners. Using chaperone-mediated degradation of ssrA-tagged model substrates, we show that both Mycobacterium tuberculosis Clp chaperones require the intact interaction face of ClpP2 to support degradation, resulting in an asymmetric complex where chaperones only bind to the ClpP2 side of the proteolytic core. This sets the Clp proteases of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, and probably other Actinobacteria, apart from the well-studied E. coli system, where chaperones bind to both sides of the protease core, and it frees the ClpP1 interaction interface for putative new binding partners.     

Assembly of the chloroplast ATP-dependent Clp protease in Arabidopsis is regulated by the ClpT accessory proteins

The ATP-dependent caseinolytic protease (Clp) is an essential housekeeping enzyme in plant chloroplasts. It is by far the most complex of all known Clp proteases, with a proteolytic core consisting of multiple catalytic ClpP and noncatalytic ClpR subunits. It also includes a unique form of Clp protein of unknown function designated ClpT, two of which exist in the model species Arabidopsis thaliana. Inactivation of ClpT1 or ClpT2 significantly reduces the amount of Clp proteolytic core, whereas loss of both proves seedling lethal under autotrophic conditions. During assembly of the Clp proteolytic core, ClpT1 first binds to the P-ring (consisting of ClpP3-6 subunits) followed by ClpT2, and only then does the P-ring combine with the R-ring (ClpP1, ClpR1-4 subunits). Most of the ClpT proteins in chloroplasts exist in vivo as homodimers, which then apparently monomerize prior to association with the P-ring. Despite their relative abundance, however, the availability of both ClpT proteins is rate limiting for the core assembly, with the addition of recombinant ClpT1 and ClpT2 increasing core content up to fourfold. Overall, ClpT appears to regulate the assembly of the chloroplast Clp protease, revealing a new and sophisticated control mechanism on the activity of this vital protease in plants.     

Downregulation of ClpR2 leads to reduced accumulation of the ClpPRS protease complex and defects in chloroplast biogenesis in Arabidopsis

Plastids contain tetradecameric Clp protease core complexes, with five ClpP Ser-type proteases, four nonproteolytic ClpR, and two associated ClpS proteins. Accumulation of total ClpPRS complex decreased twofold to threefold in an Arabidopsis thaliana T-DNA insertion mutant in CLPR2 designated clpr2-1. Differential stable isotope labeling of the ClpPRS complex with iTRAQ revealed a fivefold reduction in assembled ClpR2 accumulation and twofold to fivefold reductions in the other subunits. A ClpR2:(his)(6) fusion protein that incorporated into the chloroplast ClpPRS complex fully complemented clpr2-1. The reduced accumulation of the ClpPRS protease complex led to a pale-green phenotype with delayed shoot development, smaller chloroplasts, decreased thylakoid accumulation, and increased plastoglobule accumulation. Stromal ClpC1 and 2 were both recruited to the thylakoid surface in clpr2-1. The thylakoid membrane of clpr2-1 showed increased carotenoid content, partial inactivation of photosystem II, and upregulated thylakoid proteases and stromal chaperones, suggesting an imbalance in chloroplast protein homeostasis and a well-coordinated network of proteolysis and chaperone activities. Interestingly, a subpopulation of PsaF and several light-harvesting complex II proteins accumulated in the thylakoid with unprocessed chloroplast transit peptides. We conclude that ClpR2 cannot be functionally replaced by other ClpP/R homologues and that the ClpPRS complex is central to chloroplast biogenesis, thylakoid protein homeostasis, and plant development.     

Structure and Function of a Novel Type of ATP-dependent Clp Protease

The Clp protease is conserved among eubacteria and most eukaryotes, and uses ATP to drive protein substrate unfolding and translocation into a chamber of sequestered proteolytic active sites. The main constitutive Clp protease in photosynthetic organisms has evolved into a functionally essential and structurally intricate enzyme. The model Clp protease from the cyanobacterium Synechococcus consists of the HSP100 molecular chaperone ClpC and a mixed proteolytic core comprised of two distinct subunits, ClpP3 and ClpR. We have purified the ClpP3/R complex, the first for a Clp proteolytic core comprised of heterologous subunits. The ClpP3/R complex has unique functional and structural features, consisting of twin heptameric rings each with an identical ClpP3₃ClpR₄ configuration. As predicted by its lack of an obvious catalytic triad, the ClpR subunit is shown to be proteolytically inactive. Interestingly, extensive modification to ClpR to restore proteolytic activity to this subunit showed that its presence in the core complex is not rate-limiting for the overall proteolytic activity of the ClpCP3/R protease. Altogether, the ClpP3/R complex shows remarkable similarities to the 20 S core of the proteasome, revealing a far greater degree of convergent evolution than previously thought between the development of the Clp protease in photosynthetic organisms and that of the eukaryotic 26 S proteasome.Proteases perform numerous tasks vital for cellular homeostasis in all organisms. Much of the selective proteolysis within living cells is performed by multisubunit chaperone-protease complexes. These proteases all share a common two-component architecture and mode of action, with one of the best known examples being the proteasome in archaebacteria, certain eubacteria, and eukaryotes (1).The 20 S proteasome is a highly conserved cylindrical structure composed of two distinct types of subunits, α and β. These are organized in four stacked heptameric rings, with two central β-rings sandwiched between two outer α-rings. Although the α- and β-protein sequences are similar, it is only the latter that is proteolytic active, with a single Thr active site at the N terminus. The barrel-shaped complex is traversed by a central channel that widens up into three cavities. The catalytic sites are positioned in the central chamber formed by the β-rings, adjacent to which are two antechambers conjointly built up by β- and α-subunits. In general, substrate entry into the core complex is essentially blocked by the α-rings, and thus relies on the associating regulatory partner, PAN and 19 S complexes in archaea and eukaryotes, respectively (1). Typically, the archaeal core structure is assembled from only one type of α- and β-subunit, so that the central proteolytic chamber contains 14 catalytic active sites (2). In contrast, each ring of the eukaryotic 20 S complex has seven distinct α- and β-subunits. Moreover, only three of the seven β-subunits in each ring are proteolytically active (3). Having a strictly conserved architecture, the main difference between the 20 S proteasomes is one of complexity. In mammalian cells, the three constitutive active subunits can even be replaced with related subunits upon induction by γ-interferon to generate antigenic peptides presented by the class 1 major histocompatibility complex (4).Two chambered proteases architecturally similar to the proteasome also exist in eubacteria, HslV and ClpP. HslV is commonly thought to be the prokaryotic counterpart to the 20 S proteasome mainly because both are Thr proteases. A single type of HslV protein, however, forms a proteolytic chamber consisting of twin hexameric rather than heptameric rings (5). Also displaying structural similarities to the proteasome is the unrelated ClpP protease. The model Clp protease from Escherichia coli consists of a proteolytic ClpP core flanked on one or both sides by the ATP-dependent chaperones ClpA or ClpX (6). The ClpP proteolytic chamber is comprised of two opposing homo-heptameric rings with the catalytic sites harbored within (7). ClpP alone displays only limited peptidase activity toward short unstructured peptides (8). Larger native protein substrates need to be recognized by ClpA or ClpX and then translocated in an unfolded state into the ClpP proteolytic chamber (9, 10). Inside, the unfolded substrate is bound in an extended manner to the catalytic triads (Ser-97, His-122, and Asp-171) and degraded into small peptide fragments that can readily diffuse out (11). Several adaptor proteins broaden the array of substrates degraded by a Clp protease by binding to the associated HSP100 partner and modifying its protein substrate specificity (12, 13). One example is the adaptor ClpS that interacts with ClpA (EcClpA) and targets N-end rule substrates for degradation by the ClpAP protease (14).Like the proteasome, the Clp protease is found in a wide variety of organisms. Besides in all eubacteria, the Clp protease also exist in mammalian and plant mitochondria, as well as in various plastids of algae and plants. It also occurs in the unusual plastid in Apicomplexan protozoan (15), a family of parasites responsible for many important medical and veterinary diseases such as malaria. Of all these organisms, photobionts have by far the most diverse array of Clp proteins. This was first apparent in cyanobacteria, with the model species Synechococcus elongatus having 10 distinct Clp proteins, four HSP100 chaperones (ClpB1–2, ClpC, and ClpX), three ClpP proteins (ClpP1–3), a ClpP-like protein termed ClpR, and two adaptor proteins (ClpS1–2) (16). Of particular interest is the ClpR variant, which has protein sequence similarity to ClpP but appears to lack the catalytic triad of Ser-type proteases (17). This diversity of Clp proteins is even more extreme in photosynthetic eukaryotes, with at least 23 different Clp proteins in the higher plant Arabidopsis thaliana, most of which are plastid-localized (18).We have recently shown that two distinct Clp proteases exist in Synechococcus, both of which contain mixed proteolytic cores. The first consists of ClpP1 and ClpP2 subunits, and associates with ClpX, whereas the other has a proteolytic core consisting of ClpP3 and ClpR that binds to ClpC, as do the two ClpS adaptors (19). Of these proteases, it is the more constitutively abundant ClpCP3/R that is essential for cell viability and growth (20, 21). It is also the ClpP3/R complex that is homologous to the single type in eukaryotic plastids, all of which also have ClpC as the chaperone partner (16). In algae and plants, however, the complexity of the plastidic Clp proteolytic core has evolved dramatically. In Arabidopsis, the core complex consists of five ClpP and four ClpR paralogs, along with two unrelated Clp proteins unique to higher plants (22). Like ClpP3/R, the plastid Clp protease in Arabidopsis is essential for normal growth and development, and appears to function primarily as a housekeeping protease (23, 24).One of the most striking developments in the Clp protease in photosynthetic organisms and Apicomplexan parasites is the inclusion of ClpR within the central proteolytic core. Although this type of Clp protease has evolved into a vital enzyme, little is known about its activity or the exact role of ClpR within the core complex. To address these points we have purified the intact Synechococcus ClpP3/R proteolytic core by co-expression in E. coli. The recombinant ClpP3/R forms a double heptameric ring complex, with each ring having a specific ClpP3/R stoichiometry and arrangement. Together with ClpC, the ClpP3/R complex degrades several polypeptide substrates, but at a rate considerably slower than that by the E. coli ClpAP protease. Interestingly, although ClpR is shown to be proteolytically inactive, its inclusion in the core complex is not rate-limiting to the overall activity of the ClpCP3/R protease. In general, the results reveal remarkable similarities between the evolutionary development of the Clp protease in photosynthetic organisms and the eukaryotic proteasome relative to their simpler prokaryotic counterparts.     

The amino-terminal domain of chloroplast Hsp93 is important for its membrane association and functions in vivo

Chloroplast 93-kD heat shock protein (Hsp93/ClpC), an Hsp100 family member, is suggested to have various functions in chloroplasts, including serving as the regulatory chaperone for the ClpP protease in the stroma and acting as a motor component of the protein translocon at the envelope. Indeed, although Hsp93 is a soluble stromal protein, a portion of it is associated with the inner envelope membrane. The mechanism and functional significance of this Hsp93 membrane association have not been determined. Here, we mapped the region important for Hsp93 membrane association by creating various deletion constructs and found that only the construct with the amino-terminal domain deleted, Hsp93-ΔN, had reduced membrane association. When transformed into Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), most atHsp93V-ΔN proteins did not associate with membranes and atHsp93V-ΔΝ failed to complement the pale-green and protein import-defective phenotypes of an hsp93V knockout mutant. The residual atHsp93V-ΔN at the membranes had further reduced association with the central protein translocon component Tic110. However, the degradation of chloroplast glutamine synthetase, a potential substrate for the ClpP protease, was not affected in the hsp93V mutant or in the atHSP93V-ΔN transgenic plants. Hsp93-ΔN also had the same ATPase activity as that of full-length Hsp93. These data suggest that the association of Hsp93 with the inner envelope membrane through its amino-terminal domain is important for the functions of Hsp93 in vivo.     

Phylogenetic analysis predicts structural divergence for proteobacterial ClpC proteins

Regulated proteolysis is required in all organisms for the removal of misfolded or degradation-tagged protein substrates in cellular quality control pathways. The molecular machines that catalyze this process are known as ATP-dependent proteases with examples that include ClpAP and ClpCP. Clp/Hsp100 subunits form ring-structures that couple the energy of ATP binding and hydrolysis to protein unfolding and subsequent translocation of denatured protein into the compartmentalized ClpP protease for degradation. Copies of the clpA, clpC, clpE, clpK, and clpL genes are present in all characterized bacteria and their gene products are highly conserved in structure and function. However, the evolutionary relationship between these proteins remains unclear. Here we report a comprehensive phylogenetic analysis that suggests divergent evolution yielded ClpA from an ancestral ClpC protein and that ClpE/ClpL represent intermediates between ClpA/ClpC. This analysis also identifies a group of proteobacterial ClpC proteins that are likely not functional in regulated proteolysis. Our results strongly suggest that bacterial ClpC proteins should not be assumed to all function identically due to the structural differences identified here.     

Role of the Clp system in stress tolerance, biofilm formation, and intracellular invasion in Porphyromonas gingivalis

Clp proteases and chaperones are ubiquitous among prokaryotes and eukaryotes, and in many pathogenic bacteria the Clp stress response system is also involved in regulation of virulence properties. In this study, the roles of ClpB, ClpC, and ClpXP in stress resistance, homotypic and heterotypic biofilm formation, and intracellular invasion in the oral opportunistic pathogen Porphyromonas gingivalis were investigated. Absence of ClpC and ClpXP, but not ClpB, resulted in diminished tolerance to high temperatures. Response to oxidative stress was not affected by the loss of any of the Clp proteins. The clpC and clpXP mutants demonstrated elevated monospecies biofilm formation, and the absence of ClpXP also enhanced heterotypic P. gingivalis-Streptococcus gordonii biofilm formation. All clp mutants adhered to gingival epithelial cells to the same level as the wild type; however, ClpC and ClpXP were found to be necessary for entry into host epithelial cells. ClpB did not play a role in entry but was required for intracellular replication and survival. ClpXP negatively regulated the surface exposure of the minor fimbrial (Mfa) protein subunit of P. gingivalis, which stimulates biofilm formation but interferes with epithelial cell entry. Collectively, these results show that the Clp protease complex and chaperones control several processes that are important for the colonization and survival of P. gingivalis in the oral cavity.     

Chloroplast proteases: possible regulators of gene expression?

A wide range of proteolytic processes in the chloroplast are well recognized. These include processing of precursor proteins, removal of oxidatively damaged proteins, degradation of proteins missing their prosthetic groups or their partner subunit in a protein complex, and adjustment of the quantity of certain chloroplast proteins in response to changing environmental conditions. To date, several chloroplast proteases have been identified and cloned. The chloroplast processing enzyme is responsible for removing the transit peptides of newly imported proteins. The thylakoid processing peptidase removes the thylakoid-transfer domain from proteins translocated into the thylakoid lumen. Within the lumen, Tsp removes the carboxy-terminal tail of the precursor of the PSII D1 protein. In contrast to these processing peptidases which perform a single endo-proteolytic cut, processive proteases that can completely degrade substrate proteins also exist in chloroplasts. The serine ATP-dependent Clp protease, composed of the proteolytic subunit ClpP and the regulatory subunit ClpC, is located in the stroma, and is involved in the degradation of abnormal soluble and membrane-bound proteins. The ATP-dependent metalloprotease FtsH is bound to the thylakoid membrane, facing the stroma. It degrades unassembled proteins and is involved in the degradation of the D1 protein of PSII following photoinhibition. DegP is a serine protease bound to the lumenal side of the thylakoid membrane that might be involved in the chloroplast response to heat. All these peptidases and proteases are homologues of known bacterial enzymes. Since ATP-dependent bacterial proteases and their mitochondrial homologues are also involved in the regulation of gene expression, via their determining the levels of key regulatory proteins, chloroplast proteases are expected to play a similar role.     

Structural and Motional Contributions of the Bacillus subtilis ClpC N-Domain to Adaptor Protein Interactions

The AAA ⁺ (ATPases associated with a variety of cellular activities) superfamily protein ClpC is a key regulator of cell development in Bacillus subtilis. As part of a large oligomeric complex, ClpC controls an array of cellular processes by recognizing, unfolding, and providing misfolded and aggregated proteins as substrates for the ClpP peptidase. ClpC is unique compared to other HSP100/Clp proteins, as it requires an adaptor protein for all fundamental activities. The NMR solution structure of the N-terminal repeat domain of ClpC (N-ClpCR) comprises two structural repeats of a four-helix motif. NMR experiments used to map the MecA adaptor protein interaction surface of N-ClpCR reveal that regions involved in the interaction possess conformational flexibility and conformational exchange on the microsecond-to-millisecond timescale. The electrostatic surface of N-ClpCR differs substantially from the N-domain of Escherichia coli ClpA and ClpB, suggesting that the electrostatic surface characteristics of HSP100/Clp N-domains may play a role in adaptor protein and substrate interaction specificity, and perhaps contribute to the unique adaptor protein requirement of ClpC.     

Tic20 and Tic22 Are New Components of the Protein Import Apparatus at the Chloroplast Inner Envelope Membrane

Two components of the chloroplast envelope, Tic20 and Tic22, were previously identified as candidates for components of the general protein import machinery by their ability to covalently cross-link to nuclear-encoded preproteins trapped at an intermediate stage in import across the envelope (Kouranov, A., and D.J. Schnell. 1997. J. Cell Biol. 139:1677–1685). We have determined the primary structures of Tic20 and Tic22 and investigated their localization and association within the chloroplast envelope. Tic20 is a 20-kD integral membrane component of the inner envelope membrane. In contrast, Tic22 is a 22-kD protein that is located in the intermembrane space between the outer and inner envelope membranes and is peripherally associated with the outer face of the inner membrane. Tic20, Tic22, and a third inner membrane import component, Tic110, associate with import components of the outer envelope membrane. Preprotein import intermediates quantitatively associate with this outer/inner membrane supercomplex, providing evidence that the complex corresponds to envelope contact sites that mediate direct transport of preproteins from the cytoplasm to the stromal compartment. On the basis of these results, we propose that Tic20 and Tic22 are core components of the protein translocon of the inner envelope membrane of chloroplasts.