YTHDF1 promotes breast cancer cell growth,DNA damage repair and chemoresistance

Chemoresistance represents a major obstacle to the treatment of human cancers. Increased DNA repair capacity is one of the important mechanisms underlying chemoresistance. In silico analysis indicated that YTHDF1, an m6A binding protein, is a putative tumor promoter in breast cancer. Loss of function studies further showed that YTHDF1 promotes breast cancer cell growth in vitro and in vivo. YTHDF1 facilitates S-phase entry, DNA replication and DNA damage repair, and accordingly YTHDF1 knockdown sensitizes breast cancer cells to Adriamycin and Cisplatin as well as Olaparib, a PARP inhibitor. E2F8 is a target molecule by YTHDF1 which modulates E2F8 mRNA stability and DNA damage repair in a METTL14-dependent manner. These data demonstrate that YTHDF1 has a tumor-promoting role in breast cancer, and is a novel target to overcome chemoresistance.Subject terms: Breast cancer, Breast cancer     

Basal, oxidative and alkylative DNA damage, DNA repair efficacy and mutagen sensitivity in breast cancer

Impaired DNA repair may fuel up malignant transformation of breast cells due to the accumulation of spontaneous mutations in target genes and increasing susceptibility to exogenous carcinogens. Moreover, the effectiveness of DNA repair may contribute to failure of chemotherapy and resistance of breast cancer cells to drugs and radiation. The breast cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in DNA repair. To evaluate further the role of DNA repair in breast cancer we determined: (1) the kinetics of removal of DNA damage induced by hydrogen peroxide and the anticancer drug doxorubicin, and (2) the level of basal, oxidative and alkylative DNA damage before and during/after chemotherapy in the peripheral blood lymphocytes of breast cancer patients and healthy individuals. The level of DNA damage and the kinetics of DNA repair were evaluated by alkaline single cell gel electrophoresis (comet assay). Oxidative and alkylative DNA damage were assayed with the use of DNA repair enzymes endonuclease III (Endo III) and formamidopyrimidine-DNA glycosylase (Fpg), recognizing oxidized DNA bases and 3-methyladenine-DNA glycosylase II (AlkA) recognizing alkylated bases. We observed slower kinetics of DNA repair after treatment with hydrogen peroxide and doxorubicin in lymphocytes of breast cancer patients compared to control individuals. The level of basal, oxidative and alkylative DNA damage was higher in breast cancer patients than in the control and the difference was more pronounced when patients after chemotherapy were engaged, but usually the level of DNA damage in these patients was too high to be measured with our system. Our results indicate that peripheral blood lymphocytes of breast cancer patients have more damaged DNA and display decreased DNA repair efficacy. Therefore, these features can be considered as risk markers for breast cancer, but the question whether they are the cause or a consequence of the illness remains open. Nevertheless, our results suggest that research on the mutagen sensitivity and efficacy of DNA repair could impact the development of new diagnostic and screening strategies as well as indicate new targets to prevent and cure cancer. Moreover, the comet assay may be applied to evaluate the suitability of a particular mode of chemotherapy to a particular cancer patient.     

DNA strand breaks: the DNA template alterations that trigger p53-dependent DNA damage response pathways.

The tumor suppressor protein p53 serves as a critical regulator of a G1 cell cycle checkpoint and of apoptosis following exposure of cells to DNA-damaging agents. The mechanism by which DNA-damaging agents elevate p53 protein levels to trigger G1/S arrest or cell death remains to be elucidated. In fact, whether damage to the DNA template itself participates in transducing the signal leading to p53 induction has not yet been demonstrated. We exposed human cell lines containing wild-type p53 alleles to several different DNA-damaging agents and found that agents which rapidly induce DNA strand breaks, such as ionizing radiation, bleomycin, and DNA topoisomerase-targeted drugs, rapidly triggered p53 protein elevations. In addition, we determined that camptothecin-stimulated trapping of topoisomerase I-DNA complexes was not sufficient to elevate p53 protein levels; rather, replication-associated DNA strand breaks were required. Furthermore, treatment of cells with the antimetabolite N(phosphonoacetyl)-L-aspartate (PALA) did not cause rapid p53 protein increases but resulted in delayed increases in p53 protein levels temporally correlated with the appearance of DNA strand breaks. Finally, we concluded that DNA strand breaks were sufficient for initiating p53-dependent signal transduction after finding that introduction of nucleases into cells by electroporation stimulated rapid p53 protein elevations. While DNA strand breaks appeared to be capable of triggering p53 induction, DNA lesions other than strand breaks did not. Exposure of normal cells and excision repair-deficient xeroderma pigmentosum cells to low doses of UV light, under conditions in which thymine dimers appear but DNA replication-associated strand breaks were prevented, resulted in p53 induction attributable to DNA strand breaks associated with excision repair. Our data indicate that DNA strand breaks are sufficient and probably necessary for p53 induction in cells with wild-type p53 alleles exposed to DNA-damaging agents.     

Protein phosphatases pph3, ptc2, and ptc3 play redundant roles in DNA double-strand break repair by homologous recombination

In response to a DNA double-strand break (DSB), cells undergo a transient cell cycle arrest prior to mitosis until the break is repaired. In budding yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae), the DNA damage checkpoint is regulated by a signaling cascade of protein kinases, including Mec1 and Rad53. When DSB repair is complete, cells resume cell cycle progression (a process called "recovery") by turning off the checkpoint. Recovery involves two members of the protein phosphatase 2C (PP2C) family, Ptc2 and Ptc3, as well as the protein phosphatase 4 (PP4) enzyme, Pph3. Here, we demonstrate a new function of these three phosphatases in DSB repair. Cells lacking all three phosphatases Pph3, Ptc2, and Ptc3 exhibit synergistic sensitivities to the DNA-damaging agents camptothecin and methyl methanesulfonate, as well as hydroxyurea but not to UV light. Moreover, the simultaneous absence of Pph3, Ptc2, and Ptc3 results in defects in completing DSB repair, whereas neither single nor double deletion of the phosphatases causes a repair defect. Specifically, cells lacking all three phosphatases are defective in the repair-mediated DNA synthesis. Interestingly, the repair defect caused by the triple deletion of Pph3, Ptc2, and Ptc3 is most prominent when a DSB is slowly repaired and the DNA damage checkpoint is fully activated.     

RDM1 promotes critical processes in breast cancer tumorigenesis

Breast cancer is currently among the most common cancers in women, with almost 200,000 new cases diagnosed annually. Dysregulation of DNA repair pathways allows cells to accumulate damage and eventually mutations, with a subsequent reduction in DNA repair capacity in breast tissue, leading to tumorigenesis. One component of the DNA damage repair pathway is RAD52 motif‐containing 1 (RDM1), but the specific role of RDM1 in breast cancer and the underlying mechanism remain unclear. Here, we examined the role played by RDM1 in breast cancer cell culture using the HBL100 and MCF‐7 breast cancer cell lines. Disruption of RDM1 reduced in vitro cell proliferation and promoted apoptosis. Knockdown of RDM1 also induced up‐regulation of p53 levels, whereas RAD51 and RAD52, both involved in DNA repair, were down‐regulated. In addition, the in vivo growth of RDM1‐deficient cells was significantly repressed, suggesting that RDM1 is a novel oncogenic protein in human breast cancer cells. This study reveals a link between the DNA damage response pathway and oncogenic functionality in breast cancer. Accordingly, therapeutic targeting of RDM1 is a potential treatment strategy for breast cancer and overcoming drug resistance.     

USP37 regulates DNA damage response through stabilizing and deubiquitinating BLM

The human RecQ helicase BLM is involved in the DNA damage response, DNA metabolism, and genetic stability. Loss of function mutations in BLM cause the genetic instability/cancer predisposition syndrome Bloom syndrome. However, the molecular mechanism underlying the regulation of BLM in cancers remains largely elusive. Here, we demonstrate that the deubiquitinating enzyme USP37 interacts with BLM and that USP37 deubiquitinates and stabilizes BLM, thereby sustaining the DNA damage response (DDR). Mechanistically, DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) promotes ATM phosphorylation of USP37 and enhances the binding between USP37 and BLM. Moreover, knockdown of USP37 increases BLM polyubiquitination, accelerates its proteolysis, and impairs its function in DNA damage response. This leads to enhanced DNA damage and sensitizes breast cancer cells to DNA-damaging agents in both cell culture and in vivo mouse models. Collectively, our results establish a novel molecular mechanism for the USP37–BLM axis in regulating DSB repair with an important role in chemotherapy and radiotherapy response in human cancers.     

MAD2 interacts with DNA repair proteins and negatively regulates DNA damage repair

MAD2 (mitotic arrest deficient 2) is a key regulator of mitosis. Recently, it had been suggested that MAD2-induced mitotic arrest mediates DNA damage response and that upregulation of MAD2 confers sensitivity to DNA-damaging anticancer drug-induced apoptosis. In this study, we report a potential novel role of MAD2 in mediating DNA nucleotide excision repair through physical interactions with two DNA repair proteins, XPD (xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group D) and ERCC1. First, overexpression of MAD2 resulted in decreased nuclear accumulation of XPD, a crucial step in the initiation of DNA repair. Second, immunoprecipitation experiments showed that MAD2 was able to bind to XPD, which led to competitive suppression of binding activity between XPD and XPA, resulting in the prevention of physical interactions between DNA repair proteins. Third, unlike its role in mitosis, the N-terminus domain seemed to be more important in the binding activity between MAD2 and XPD. Fourth, phosphorylation of H2AX, a process that is important for recruitment of DNA repair factors to DNA double-strand breaks, was suppressed in MAD2-overexpressing cells in response to DNA damage. These results suggest a negative role of MAD2 in DNA damage response, which may be accounted for its previously reported role in promoting sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents in cancer cells. However, the interaction between MAD2 and ERCC1 did not show any effect on the binding activity between ERCC1 and XPA in the presence or absence of DNA damage. Our results suggest a novel function of MAD2 by interfering with DNA repair proteins.     

Danthron Induces DNA Damage and Inhibits DNA Repair Gene Expressions in GBM 8401 Human Brain Glioblastoma Multiforms Cells

Our primary studies had shown that danthron induced cytotoxic effects, including apoptosis and inhibition of migration and invasion. However, danthron-affected DNA damage and repair gene expressions are not clear. In this study, we investigated to examine whether or not danthron induced DNA damage and inhibited DNA repair gene expression in human brain glioblastoma multiforms (GBM 8401) cells. The results from Comet assay indicated that incubation of GBM 8401 cells with 0, 50, 100 and 150 μM of danthron led to a longer DNA migration smear based on the single cell electrophoresis (Comet tail). The results from real-time PCR assay demonstrated that 100 μM of danthron for 24 h treatment in GBM 8401 cells led to decrease all examined ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM), ataxia-telangiectasia and Rad3-related (ATR), breast cancer 1, early onset (BRCA-1), 14-3-3 proteins sigma (14-3-3σ), DNA-dependent serine/threonine protein kinase (DNA-PK) and O ⁶ -methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) mRNA expressions. Taken together, the present study showed that danthron caused DNA damage and inhibited DNA repair genes, which may be the factors for danthron-inhibited cell growth in vitro.     

Detection of clustered DNA lesions: Biological and clinical applications

Humans are daily exposed to background radiation and various sources of oxidative stress. My research has focused in the last 12 years on the effects of ionizing radiation on DNA, which is considered as the key target of radiation in the cell. Ionizing radiation and endogenous cellular oxidative stress can also induce closely spaced oxidatively induced DNA lesions called "clusters" of DNA damage or locally multiply damage sites, as first introduced by John Ward. I am now interested in the repair mechanisms of clustered DNA damage, which is considered as the most difficult for the cell to repair. A main part of my research is devoted to evaluating the role of clustered DNA damage in the promotion of carcinogenesis in vitro and in vivo . Currently in my laboratory, there are two main ongoing projects. (1) Study of the role of BRCA1 and DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit repair proteins in the processing of clustered DNA damage in human cancer cells. For this project, we use several tumor cell lines, such as breast cancer cell lines MCF-7 and HCC1937 (BRCA1 deficient) and human glioblastoma cells MO59J/K; and (2) Possible use of DNA damage clusters as novel cancer biomarkers for prognostic and therapeutic applications related to modulation of oxidative stress. In this project human tumor and mice tissues are being used.     

Involvement of the insulin-like growth factor binding proteins in the cancer cell response to DNA damage

The complex mechanisms that cells have evolved to meet the challenge of constant exposure to DNA-damaging stimuli, also serve to protect cancer cells from the cytotoxic effects of chemo- and radiotherapy. IGFBPs appear to be involved, directly or indirectly, in some of these protective mechanisms. Activation of p53 is an early response to genotoxic stress, and all six human IGFBP genes have predicted p53 response elements in their promoter and/or intronic regions, at least some of which are functional. IGFBP3 has been extensively characterized as a p53-inducible gene, but in some cases it is suppressed by mutant p53 forms. DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), induced by radiotherapy and some chemotherapies, potentially lead to apoptotic cell death, senescence, or repair and recovery. DSB damage can be repaired by homologous recombination or non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ), depending on the cell cycle stage, availability of key repair proteins, and other factors. The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) has been implicated in the NHEJ pathway, and EGFR inhibition may inhibit repair, promoting apoptosis and thus improving sensitivity to chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Both IGFBP-3 and IGFBP-6 interact with components of the NHEJ pathway, and IGFBP-3 can facilitate this process through direct interaction with both EGFR and the catalytic subunit of DNA-PK. Cell fate after DNA damage may in part be regulated by the balance between the sphingolipids ceramide and sphingosine-1-phosphate, and IGFBPs can influence the production of both lipids. A better understanding of the involvement of IGFBPs in the DNA damage response in cancer cells may lead to improved methods of sensitizing cancers to DNA-damaging therapies.     

New tricks for old drugs: the anticarcinogenic potential of DNA repair inhibitors

Defective or abortive repair of DNA lesions has been associated with carcinogenesis. Therefore it is imperative for a cell to accurately repair its DNA after damage if it is to return to a normal cellular phenotype. In certain circumstances, if DNA damage cannot be repaired completely and with high fidelity, it is more advantageous for an organism to have some of its more severely damaged cells die rather than survive as neoplastic transformants. A number of DNA repair inhibitors have the potential to act as anticarcinogenic compounds. These drugs are capable of modulating DNA repair, thus promoting cell death rather than repair of potentially carcinogenic DNA damage mediated by error-prone DNA repair processes. In theory, exposure to a DNA repair inhibitor during, or immediately after, carcinogenic exposure should decrease or prevent tumorigenesis. However, the ability of DNA repair inhibitors to prevent cancer development is difficult to interpret depending upon the system used and the type of genotoxic stress. Inhibitors may act on multiple aspects of DNA repair as well as the cellular signaling pathways activated in response to the initial damage. In this review, we summarize basic DNA repair mechanisms and explore the effects of a number of DNA repair inhibitors that not only potentiate DNA-damaging agents but also decrease carcinogenicity. In particular, we focus on a novel anti-tumor agent, β-lapachone, and its potential to block transformation by modulating poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1.     

Loss of H3 K79 Trimethylation Leads to Suppression of Rtt107-dependent DNA Damage Sensitivity through the Translesion Synthesis Pathway

Genomic integrity is maintained by the coordinated interaction of many DNA damage response pathways, including checkpoints, DNA repair processes, and cell cycle restart. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the BRCA1 C-terminal domain-containing protein Rtt107/Esc4 is required for restart of DNA replication after successful repair of DNA damage and for cellular resistance to DNA-damaging agents. Rtt107 and its interaction partner Slx4 are phosphorylated during the initial phase of DNA damage response by the checkpoint kinases Mec1 and Tel1. Because the natural chromatin template plays an important role during the DNA damage response, we tested whether chromatin modifications affected the requirement for Rtt107 and Slx4 during DNA damage repair. Here, we report that the sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents of rtt107Δ and slx4Δ mutants was rescued by inactivation of the chromatin regulatory pathway leading to H3 K79 trimethylation. Further analysis revealed that lack of Dot1, the H3 K79 methyltransferase, led to activation of the translesion synthesis pathway, thereby allowing the survival in the presence of DNA damage. The DNA damage-induced phosphorylation of Rtt107 and Slx4, which was mutually dependent, was not restored in the absence of Dot1. The antagonistic relationship between Rtt107 and Dot1 was specific for DNA damage-induced phenotypes, whereas the genomic instability caused by loss of Rtt107 was not rescued. These data revealed a multifaceted functional relationship between Rtt107 and Dot1 in the DNA damage response and maintenance of genome integrity.     

MLK4 regulates DNA damage response and promotes triple-negative breast cancer chemoresistance

Chemoresistance constitutes a major challenge in the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Mixed-Lineage Kinase 4 (MLK4) is frequently amplified or overexpressed in TNBC where it facilitates the aggressive growth and migratory potential of breast cancer cells. However, the functional role of MLK4 in resistance to chemotherapy has not been investigated so far. Here, we demonstrate that MLK4 promotes TNBC chemoresistance by regulating the pro-survival response to DNA-damaging therapies. We observed that MLK4 knock-down or inhibition sensitized TNBC cell lines to chemotherapeutic agents in vitro. Similarly, MLK4-deficient cells displayed enhanced sensitivity towards doxorubicin treatment in vivo. MLK4 silencing induced persistent DNA damage accumulation and apoptosis in TNBC cells upon treatment with chemotherapeutics. Using phosphoproteomic profiling and reporter assays, we demonstrated that loss of MLK4 reduced phosphorylation of key DNA damage response factors, including ATM and CHK2, and compromised DNA repair via non-homologous end-joining pathway. Moreover, our mRNA-seq analysis revealed that MLK4 is required for DNA damage-induced expression of several NF-кB-associated cytokines, which facilitate TNBC cells survival. Lastly, we found that high MLK4 expression is associated with worse overall survival of TNBC patients receiving anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Collectively, these results identify a novel function of MLK4 in the regulation of DNA damage response signaling and indicate that inhibition of this kinase could be an effective strategy to overcome TNBC chemoresistance.Subject terms: Chemotherapy, Oncogenes, Cell signalling, Breast cancer     

BRCA1 role in the mitigation of radiotoxicity and chromosomal instability through repair of clustered DNA lesions

Oxidatively-induced clustered DNA lesions are considered the signature of any ionizing radiation like the ones human beings are exposed daily from various environmental sources (medical X-rays, radon, etc.). To evaluate the role of BRCA1 deficiencies in the mitigation of radiation-induced toxicity and chromosomal instability we have used two human breast cancer cell lines, the BRCA1 deficient HCC1937 cells and as a control the BRCA1 wild-type MCF-7 cells. As an additional control for the DNA damage repair measurements, the HCC1937 cells with partially reconstituted BRCA1 expression were used. Since clustered DNA damage is considered the signature of ionizing radiation, we have measured the repair of double strand breaks (DSBs), non-DSB bistranded oxidative clustered DNA lesions (OCDLs) as well as single strand breaks (SSBs) in cells exposed to radiotherapy-relevant γ-ray doses. Parallel measurements were performed in the accumulation of chromatid and isochromatid breaks. For the measurement of OCDL repair, we have used a novel adaptation of the denaturing single cell gel electrophoresis (Comet assay) and pulsed field gel electrophoresis with Escherichia coli repair enzymes as DNA damage probes. Independent monitoring of the γ-H2AX foci was also performed while metaphase chromatid lesions were measured as an indicator of chromosomal instability. HCC1937 cells showed a significant accumulation of all types of DNA damage and chromatid breaks compared to MCF-7 while BRCA1 partial expression contributed significantly in the overall repair of OCDLs. These results further support the biological significance of repair resistant clustered DNA damage leading to chromosomal instability. The current results combined with previous findings on the minimized ability of base clusters to induce cell death (mainly induced by DSBs), enhance the potential association of OCDLs with breast cancer development especially in the case of a BRCA1 deficiency leading to the survival of breast cells carrying a high load of unrepaired DNA damage clusters.