Estimating linkage disequilibrium between a polymorphic marker locus and a trait locus in natural populations.

Positional cloning of gene(s) underlying a complex trait requires a high-resolution linkage map between the trait locus and genetic marker loci. Recent research has shown that this may be achieved through appropriately modeling and screening linkage disequilibrium between the candidate marker locus and the major trait locus. A quantitative genetics model was developed in the present study to estimate the coefficient of linkage disequilibrium between a polymorphic genetic marker locus and a locus underlying a quantitative trait as well as the relevant genetic parameters using the sample from randomly mating populations. Asymptotic covariances of the maximum-likelihood estimates of the parameters were formulated. Convergence of the EM-based statistical algorithm for calculating the maximum-likelihood estimates was confirmed and its utility to analyze practical data was exploited by use of extensive Monte-Carlo simulations. Appropriateness of calculating the asymptotic covariance matrix in the present model was investigated for three different approaches. Numerical analyses based on simulation data indicated that accurate estimation of the genetic parameters may be achieved if a sample size of 500 is used and if segregation at the trait locus explains not less than a quarter of phenotypic variation of the trait, but the study reveals difficulties in predicting the asymptotic variances of these maximum-likelihood estimates. A comparison was made between the statistical powers of the maximum-likelihood analysis and the previously proposed regression analysis for detecting the disequilibrium.     

Transmission-disequilibrium tests for quantitative traits.

The transmission-disequilibrium test (TDT) of Spielman et al. is a family-based linkage-disequilibrium test that offers a powerful way to test for linkage between alleles and phenotypes that is either causal (i.e., the marker locus is the disease/trait allele) or due to linkage disequilibrium. The TDT is equivalent to a randomized experiment and, therefore, is resistant to confounding. When the marker is extremely close to the disease locus or is the disease locus itself, tests such as the TDT can be far more powerful than conventional linkage tests. To date, the TDT and most other family-based association tests have been applied only to dichotomous traits. This paper develops five TDT-type tests for use with quantitative traits. These tests accommodate either unselected sampling or sampling based on selection of phenotypically extreme offspring. Power calculations are provided and show that, when a candidate gene is available (1) these TDT-type tests are at least an order of magnitude more efficient than two common sib-pair tests of linkage; (2) extreme sampling results in substantial increases in power; and (3) if the most extreme 20% of the phenotypic distribution is selectively sampled, across a wide variety of plausible genetic models, quantitative-trait loci explaining as little as 5% of the phenotypic variation can be detected at the .0001 alpha level with <300 observations.     

Comparison of linkage-disequilibrium methods for localization of genes influencing quantitative traits in humans

Linkage disequilibrium has been used to help in the identification of genes predisposing to certain qualitative diseases. Although several linkage-disequilibrium tests have been developed for localization of genes influencing quantitative traits, these tests have not been thoroughly compared with one another. In this report we compare, under a variety of conditions, several different linkage-disequilibrium tests for identification of loci affecting quantitative traits. These tests use either single individuals or parent-child trios. When we compared tests with equal samples, we found that the truncated measured allele (TMA) test was the most powerful. The trait allele frequencies, the stringency of sample ascertainment, the number of marker alleles, and the linked genetic variance affected the power, but the presence of polygenes did not. When there were more than two trait alleles at a locus in the population, power to detect disequilibrium was greatly diminished. The presence of unlinked disequilibrium (D'*) increased the false-positive error rates of disequilibrium tests involving single individuals but did not affect the error rates of tests using family trios. The increase in error rates was affected by the stringency of selection, the trait allele frequency, and the linked genetic variance but not by polygenic factors. In an equilibrium population, the TMA test is most powerful, but, when adjusted for the presence of admixture, Allison test 3 becomes the most powerful whenever D'*>.15.     

Modeling linkage disequilibrium between a polymorphic marker locus and a locus affecting complex dichotomous traits in natural populations

Linkage disequilibrium is an important topic in evolutionary and population genetics. An issue yet to be settled is the theory required to extend the linkage disequilibrium analysis to complex traits. In this study, we present theoretical analysis and methods for detecting or estimating linkage disequilibrium (LD) between a polymorphic marker locus and any one of the loci affecting a complex dichotomous trait on the basis of samples randomly or selectively collected from natural populations. Statistical properties of these methods were investigated and their powers were compared analytically or by use of Monte Carlo simulations. The results show that the disequilibrium may be detected with a power of 80% by using phenotypic records and marker genotype when both the trait and marker variants are common (30%) and the LD is relatively high (40-100% of the theoretical maximum). The maximum-likelihood approach provides accurate estimates of the model parameters as well as detection of linkage disequilibrium. The likelihood method is preferred for its higher power and reliability in parameter estimation. The approaches developed in this article are also compared to those for analyzing a continuously distributed quantitative trait. It is shown that a larger sample size is required for the dichotomous trait model to obtain the same level of power in detecting linkage disequilibrium as the continuous trait analysis. Potential use of these estimates in mapping the trait locus is also discussed.     

Identifying quantitative trait locus by genetic background interactions in association studies

Association studies are designed to identify main effects of alleles across a potentially wide range of genetic backgrounds. To control for spurious associations, effects of the genetic background itself are often incorporated into the linear model, either in the form of subpopulation effects in the case of structure or in the form of genetic relationship matrices in the case of complex pedigrees. In this context epistatic interactions between loci can be captured as an interaction effect between the associated locus and the genetic background. In this study I developed genetic and statistical models to tie the locus by genetic background interaction idea back to more standard concepts of epistasis when genetic background is modeled using an additive relationship matrix. I also simulated epistatic interactions in four-generation randomly mating pedigrees and evaluated the ability of the statistical models to identify when a biallelic associated locus was epistatic to other loci. Under additive-by-additive epistasis, when interaction effects of the associated locus were quite large (explaining 20% of the phenotypic variance), epistasis was detected in 79% of pedigrees containing 320 individuals. The epistatic model also predicted the genotypic value of progeny better than a standard additive model in 78% of simulations. When interaction effects were smaller (although still fairly large, explaining 5% of the phenotypic variance), epistasis was detected in only 9% of pedigrees containing 320 individuals and the epistatic and additive models were equally effective at predicting the genotypic values of progeny. Epistasis was detected with the same power whether the overall epistatic effect was the result of a single pairwise interaction or the sum of nine pairwise interactions, each generating one ninth of the epistatic variance. The power to detect epistasis was highest (94%) at low QTL minor allele frequency, fell to a minimum (60%) at minor allele frequency of about 0.2, and then plateaued at about 80% as alleles reached intermediate frequencies. The power to detect epistasis declined when the linkage disequilibrium between the DNA marker and the functional polymorphism was not complete.     

A test of transmission/disequilibrium for quantitative traits in pedigree data, by multiple regression.

The transmission/disequilibrium (TD) test (TDT), proposed, by Spielman et al., for binary traits is a powerful method for detection of linkage between a marker locus and a disease locus, in the presence of allelic association. As a test for linkage disequilibrium, the TDT makes the assumption that any allelic association present is due to linkage. Allison proposed a series of TD-type tests for quantitative traits and calculated their power, assuming that the marker locus is the disease locus. All these tests assume that the observations are independent, and therefore they are applicable, as a test for linkage, only for nuclear-family data. In this report, we propose a regression-based TD-type test for linkage between a marker locus and a quantitative trait locus, using information on the parent-to-offspring transmission status of the associated allele at the marker locus. This method does not require independence of observations, thus allowing for analysis of pedigree data as well, and allows adjustment for covariates. We investigate the statistical power and validity of the test by simulating markers at various recombination fractions from the disease locus.     

Association analysis of population-based quantitative trait data: an assessment of ANOVA

The classical analysis of variance (ANOVA) compares the means of different groups under the assumption that the variances within each of the groups are equal. However, for genetic studies of complex disorders, it is not reasonable to assume that variance of a quantitative trait within each genotype at the trait locus will be equal. Thus, the use of ANOVA may lead to misleading association inferences. In this article, we perform a simulation-based study to assess the rate of false positives and the power of ANOVA under various probability distributions of the quantitative trait and different genetic parameters such as allele frequencies and coefficient of linkage disequilibrium.     

Models and tests of linkage and association studies of quantitative trait locus for multi-allele marker Loci

In this paper, we explore models and tests for association and linkage studies of a quantitative trait locus (QTL) linked to a multi-allele marker locus. Based on the difference between an offspring's conditional trait means of receiving and not receiving an allele from a parent at marker locus, we propose three statistics T(m), T(m,row) and T(m,col) to test association or linkage disequilibrium between the marker locus and the QTL. These tests are composite tests, and use the offspring marginal sample means including offspring data of both homozygous and heterozygous parents. For the linkage study, we calculate the offspring's conditional trait mean given the allele transmission status of a heterozygous parent at the marker locus. Based on the difference between the conditional means of a transmitted and a nontransmitted allele from a heterozygous parent, we propose statistics T(parsi), T(satur), T(gen) and T(m,het) to perform composite tests of linkage between the marker locus and the quantitative trait locus in the presence of association. These tests only use the offspring data that are related to the heterozygous parents at the marker locus. T(parsi) is a parsimonious or allele-wise statistic, T(satur) and T(gen )are satured or genotype-wise statistics, and T(m,het) compares the row and column sample means for offspring data of heterozygous parents. After comparing the powers and the sample sizes, we conclude that T(parsi) has higher power than those of the bi-allele tests, T(satur), T(gen), and T(m,het). If there is tight linkage between the marker and the trait locus, T(parsi) is powerful in detecting linkage between the marker and the trait locus in the presence of association. By investigating the goodness-of-fit of T(parsi), we find that T(satur) does not gain much power compared to that of T(parsi). Moreover, T(parsi) takes into account the pattern of the data that is consistent with linkage and linkage disequilibrium. As the number of alleles at the marker locus increases, T(parsi) is very conservative, and can be useful even for sparse data. To illustrate the usefulness and the power of the methods proposed in this paper, we analyze the chromosome 6 data of the Oxford asthma data, Genetic Analysis Workshop 12.     

Disequilibrium mapping of a quantitative-trait locus in an expanding population.

Linkage disequilibrium (LD) mapping can be successful if there is strong nonrandom association between marker alleles and an allele affecting a trait of interest. The principles of LD mapping of dichotomous traits are well understood, but less is known about LD mapping of a quantitative-trait locus (QTL). It is shown in this report that selective genotyping can increase the power to detect and map a rare allele of large effect at a QTL. Two statistical tests of the association between an allele and a quantitative character are proposed. These tests are approximately independent, so information from them can be combined. Analytic theory is developed to show that these two tests are effective in detecting the presence of a low-frequency allele with a relatively large effect on the character when the QTL is either already a candidate locus or closely linked to a marker locus that is in strong LD with the QTL. The latter situation is expected in a rapidly growing population in which the allele of large effect was present initially in one copy. Therefore, the proposed tests are useful under the same conditions as those for successful LD mapping of a dichotomous trait or disease. Simulations show that, for detection of the presence of a QTL, these tests are more powerful than a simple t-test. The tests also provide a basis for defining a measure of association, gamma, between a low-frequency allele at a putative QTL and a low-frequency allele at a marker locus.     

Linkage and association studies of QTL for nuclear families by mixed models

The transmission disequilibrium test (TDT) has been utilized to test the linkage and association between a genetic trait locus and a marker. Spielman et al. (1993) introduced TDT to test linkage between a qualitative trait and a marker in the presence of association. In the presence of linkage, TDT can be applied to test for association for fine mapping (Martin et al., 1997; Spielman and Ewens, 1996). In recent years, extensive research has been carried out on the TDT between a quantitative trait and a marker locus (Allison, 1997; Fan et al., 2002; George et al., 1999; Rabinowitz, 1997; Xiong et al., 1998; Zhu and Elston, 2000, 2001). The original TDT for both qualitative and quantitative traits requires unrelated offspring of heterozygous parents for analysis, and much research has been carried out to extend it to fit for different settings. For nuclear families with multiple offspring, one approach is to treat each child independently for analysis. Obviously, this may not be a valid method since offspring of one family are related to each other. Another approach is to select one offspring randomly from each family for analysis. However, with this method much information may be lost. Martin et al. (1997, 2000) constructed useful statistical tests to analyse the data for qualitative traits. In this paper, we propose to use mixed models to analyse sample data of nuclear families with multiple offspring for quantitative traits according to the models in Amos (1994). The method uses data of all offspring by taking into account their trait mean and variance-covariance structures, which contain all the effects of major gene locus, polygenic loci and environment. A test statistic based on mixed models is shown to be more powerful than the test statistic proposed by George et al. (1999) under moderate disequilibrium for nuclear families. Moreover, it has higher power than the TDT statistic which is constructed by randomly choosing a single offspring from each nuclear family.     

Power calculations for the transmission/disequilibrium and affected sib pair tests using elementary probability methods

The transmission/disequilibrium test (TDT) and the affected sib pair test (ASP) both test for the association of a marker allele with some conditions. Here, we present methods for calculating the probability of detecting the association (power) for a study examining a fixed number of families for suitability for the study and for calculating the number of such families to be examined. Both calculations use a genetic model for the association. The model considered posits a bi-allelic marker locus that is linked to a bi-allelic disease locus with a possibly nonzero recombination fraction between the loci. The penetrance of the disease is an increasing function of the number of disease alleles. The TDT tests whether the transmission by a heterozygous parent of a particular allele at a marker locus to an affected offspring occurs with probability greater than 0.5. The ASP tests whether transmission of the same allele to two affected sibs occurs with probability greater than 0.5. In either case, evidence that the probability is greater than 0.5 is evidence for association between the marker and the disease. Study inclusion criteria (IC) can greatly affect the necessary sample size of a TDT or ASP study. IC considered by us include a randomly selected parent at least one parent or both parents required to be heterozygous. It also allows a specified minimum number of affected offspring to be required (TDT only). We use elementary probability calculations rather than complex mathematical manipulations or asymptotic methods (large sample size approximations) to compute power and requisite sample size for a proposed study. The advantages of these methods are simplicity and generality.     

Transmission disequilibrium test with discordant sib pairs when parents are available

The transmission disequilibrium test (TDT) has been employed to map disease susceptibility loci (DSL), while being immune to the problem of population admixture. The customary TDT test (TDT(D)) was developed for affected child(ren) and their parents and was most often applied to case-parent trios. Recently, the TDT has been extended to the situations when (1) parents are not available but affected and nonaffected sibs from each family are available, (2) unrelated control-parent trios are available for combined analyses with case-parent trios (TDT(DC)), and (3) large pedigrees. For many diseases, affected children in the case-parent trios enlisted into the TDT(D) have unaffected sibs who can be recruited. We present an extension of the TDT by effectively incorporating one unaffected sib of each of the affected children in the case-parent trios into a single analysis (TDT(DS), where DS denotes discordant sib pairs). We have developed a general analytical method for computing the statistical power of the TDT(DS) under any genetic model, the accuracy of which is validated by computer simulations. We compare the power of the TDT(D), TDT(DC), and TDT(DS) under a range of parameter space and genetic models. We find that the TDT(DS) is generally more powerful than the TDT(DC) and TDT(D), particularly when the disease is prevalent (>30%) in the population. The relative power of the TDT(D) and the TDT(DS) largely depends upon the allele frequencies and genetic effects at the DSL, whereas the recombination rate, the degree of linkage disequilibrium, and the marker allele frequencies have little effect. Importantly, the TDT(DS) not only may be more powerful, it also has the advantage of being able to test for segregation distortion that may yield false linkage/association in the TDT(D).     

Power and sample size calculations for genetic case/control studies using gene-centric SNP maps: application to human chromosomes 6, 21, and 22 in three populations

Power and sample size calculations are critical parts of any research design for genetic association. We present a method that utilizes haplotype frequency information and average marker-marker linkage disequilibrium on SNPs typed in and around all genes on a chromosome. The test statistic used is the classic likelihood ratio test applied to haplotypes in case/control populations. Haplotype frequencies are computed through specification of genetic model parameters. Power is determined by computation of the test's non-centrality parameter. Power per gene is computed as a weighted average of the power assuming each haplotype is associated with the trait. We apply our method to genotype data from dense SNP maps across three entire chromosomes (6, 21, and 22) for three different human populations (African-American, Caucasian, Chinese), three different models of disease (additive, dominant, and multiplicative) and two trait allele frequencies (rare, common). We perform a regression analysis using these factors, average marker-marker disequilibrium, and the haplotype diversity across the gene region to determine which factors most significantly affect average power for a gene in our data. Also, as a 'proof of principle' calculation, we perform power and sample size calculations for all genes within 100 kb of the PSORS1 locus (chromosome 6) for a previously published association study of psoriasis. Results of our regression analysis indicate that four highly significant factors that determine average power to detect association are: disease model, average marker-marker disequilibrium, haplotype diversity, and the trait allele frequency. These findings may have important implications for the design of well-powered candidate gene association studies. Our power and sample size calculations for the PSORS1 gene appear consistent with published findings, namely that there is substantial power (>0.99) for most genes within 100 kb of the PSORS1 locus at the 0.01 significance level.     

Linkage disequilibrium mapping of quantitative trait loci under truncation selection

As a dense map of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers are available, population-based linkage disequilibrium (LD) mapping or association study is becoming one of the major tools for identifying quantitative trait loci (QTL) and for fine gene mapping. However, in many cases, LD between the marker and trait locus is not very strong. Approaches that maximize the potential of detecting LD will be essential for the success of LD mapping of QTL. In this paper, we propose two strategies for increasing the probability of detecting LD: (1) phenotypic selection and (2) haplotype LD mapping. To provide the foundations for LD mapping of QTL under selection, we develop analytic tools for assessing the impact of phenotypic selection on allele and haplotype frequencies, and LD under three trait models: single trait locus, two unlinked trait loci, and two linked trait loci with or without epistasis. In addition to a traditional chi(2) test, which compares the difference in allele or haplotype frequencies in the selected sample and population sample, we present multiple regression methods for LD mapping of QTL, and investigate which methods are effective in employing phenotypic selection for QTL mapping. We also develop a statistical framework for investigating and comparing the power of the single marker and multilocus haplotype test for LD mapping of QTL. Finally, the proposed methods are applied to mapping QTL influencing variation in systolic blood pressure in an isolated Chinese population.     

How do homozygous parents affect TDT as a test for association?

The traditional transmission disequilibrium test (TDT) (Spielman et al., 1993) is a powerful test for association only in the presence of linkage. Since allele transmissions from homozygous parents do not carry any information on linkage, the TDT statistic uses data only on heterozygous parents. However, homozygous parents carry information on association between alleles at a marker locus and a disease locus. In this article, we explore whether inclusion of homozygous parents increases the power to detect association. The resultant test statistic follows a chi(2) distribution with 2 degrees of freedom. Monte-Carlo simulations are included to compare the performance of this test with the traditional TDT under different disease models.     

The effects of selected sampling on the transmission disequilibrium test of a quantitative trait locus

We investigate how sampling of parents or children based on their extreme phenotypic values selected from clinical databases would affect the power of identification of quantitative trait loci (QTL) by a transmission disequilibrium test (TDT). We consider three selective sampling schemes based on the selection of phenotypic values of parents or children in nuclear families: (1) two children, one of extreme value, the other random; (2) two children extremely discordant; (3) one parent of extreme value. Other family members not specified will be recruited randomly with regard to phenotypic values. Our study shows that the second sampling scheme can always enhance the power for QTL identification, sometimes dramatically so. The increase in the statistical power of the TDT is particularly dramatic when h2 at the QTL under test is small or intermediate (e.g. 0.05 or 0.10). For the other two sampling schemes, under dominant effects at the QTL, the power is always increased relative to random sampling; however, under recessive or additive genetic effects, the power gain is generally minor or even decreased a little sometimes. Allele frequencies at the QTL and the selection stringency are important for determining the effect of selective sampling on the power of QTL identification. Our study is useful as a practical guideline on how to perform the TDT efficiently in practice by taking advantage of the extensive databases accumulated that are enriched with people of extreme phenotypic values.     

Contribution of an additive locus to genetic variance when inheritance is multi-factorial with implications on interpretation of GWAS

Although the effects of linkage disequilibrium (LD) on partition of genetic variance have received attention in quantitative genetics, there has been little discussion on how this phenomenon affects attribution of variance to a given locus. This paper reinforces the point that standard metrics used for assessing the contribution of a locus to variance can be misleading when there is linkage LD and that factors such as distribution of effects and of allelic frequencies over loci, or existence of frequency-dependent effects, play a role as well. An apparently new metric is proposed for measuring how much of the variability is contributed by a locus when LD exists. Effects of intervening factors, such as type and extent of LD, number of loci, distribution of effects, and of allelic frequencies over loci, as well as a model for generating frequency-dependent effects, are illustrated via hypothetical simulation scenarios. Implications on the interpretation of genome-wide association studies (GWAS), as typically carried out in human genetics, where single marker regression and the assumption of a sole quantitative trait locus (QTL) are common, are discussed. It is concluded that the standard attributions to variance contributed by a single QTL from a GWAS analysis may be misleading, conceptually and statistically, when a trait is complex and affected by sets of many genes in linkage disequilibrium. Yet another factor to consider in the “missing heritability” saga?.     

一个基于熵的精细定位数量性状位点的指数

针对数量性状位点的精细定位,本文采用群体的极端样本,利用稠密的标记位点,通过比较标记的熵和条件熵,给出了一个基于熵的指数。该指数是标记基因和性状位点间连锁不平衡系数的函数,它不依赖于标记基因的频率。该指数对应我们之前提出的数量性状位点精细定位的哈迪-温伯格不平衡(HWD)指数,但在精细定位数量性状位点时,本文提出的指数的效能要高于哈迪-温伯格不平衡(HWD)指数。通过计算机模拟,文章调查了不同遗传参数下该指数的性质。模拟结果表明该指数用作精细定位是有效的。     

Marker selection for the transmission/disequilibrium test, in recently admixed populations.

Recent admixture between genetically differentiated populations can result in high levels of association between alleles at loci that are <=10 cM apart. The transmission/disequilibrium test (TDT) proposed by Spielman et al. (1993) can be a powerful test of linkage between disease and marker loci in the presence of association and therefore could be a useful test of linkage in admixed populations. The degree of association between alleles at two loci depends on the differences in allele frequencies, at the two loci, in the founding populations; therefore, the choice of marker is important. For a multiallelic marker, one strategy that may improve the power of the TDT is to group marker alleles within a locus, on the basis of information about the founding populations and the admixed population, thereby collapsing the marker into one with fewer alleles. We have examined the consequences of collapsing a microsatellite into a two-allele marker, when two founding populations are assumed for the admixed population, and have found that if there is random mating in the admixed population, then typically there is a collapsing for which the power of the TDT is greater than that for the original microsatellite marker. A method is presented for finding the optimal collapsing that has minimal dependence on the disease and that uses estimates either of marker allele frequencies in the two founding populations or of marker allele frequencies in the current, admixed population and in one of the founding populations. Furthermore, this optimal collapsing is not always the collapsing with the largest difference in allele frequencies in the founding populations. To demonstrate this strategy, we considered a recent data set, published previously, that provides frequency estimates for 30 microsatellites in 13 populations.     

Robust indices of Hardy-Weinberg disequilibrium for QTL fine mapping

Hardy-Weinberg disequilibrium (HWD) measures have been proposed using dense markers to fine map a quantitative trait locus (QTL) to regions < approximately 1 cM. Earlier HWD measures may introduce bias in the fine mapping because they are dependent on marker allele frequencies across loci. Hence, HWD indices that do not depend on marker allele frequencies are desired for fine mapping. Based on our earlier work, here we present four new HWD indices that do not depend on marker allele frequencies. Two are for use when marker allele frequencies in a study population are known, and two are for use when marker allele frequencies in a study population are not known and are only known in the extreme samples. The new measures are a function of the genetic distance between the marker locus and a QTL. Through simulations, we investigated and compared the fine mapping performance of the new HWD measures with that of the earlier ones. Our results show that when marker allele frequencies vary across loci, the new measures presented here are more robust and powerful.