共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 53 毫秒
1.
2.
1 植物名称蓝蓟(Echium VUlgare L.).
2 材料类别茎段和茎尖.
3 培养条件基本培养基为MS.(1)诱导芽萌发培养基:MS+6-BA 0.5 mg·L-1(单位下同)+NAA 0.1.(2)增殖培养基:MS+6-BA 1.0+NAA 0.1;(3)生根培养基:MS+IBA 0.5+NAA 0.05. 相似文献
3.
4.
5.
6.
圆叶蒙桑的组织培养与快速繁殖 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
1植物名称圆叶蒙桑(Morus mongolica var.rotundifolia)。2材料类别茎及茎尖。3培养条件以MS为基本培养基。(1)诱导及增殖培养基:MS+6-BA1mg·L-1(单位下同)+NAA0.1。(2)生根培养基:1/2MS+IBA1。以上培养基中均加入3%的蔗糖和0.8%琼脂,pH5.8。培养温度为(24±2)℃,光照时间12h·d-1,光强40μmol·m-2·s-1左右。4生长与分化情况4.1芽的诱导采集无病虫害、生长健壮的圆叶蒙桑枝条,剪掉叶片后用流水冲洗干净,在超净台上,剪成0.5~1.0cm的茎段和茎尖,放置在75%的酒精中浸泡20s,无菌水冲洗3~4遍,用次氯酸钠灭菌10min,再用无菌水冲洗3~4… 相似文献
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
白牛槭的组织培养与快速繁殖 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
1植物名称白牛槭(Acer mandshuricum Maxim.)。
2材料类别未成熟胚。
3培养条件(1)愈伤组织诱导及分化培养基:改良MS+6-BA1.0mg.L^-1(单位下同)+TDZ1.0+NAA0.5+2,4-D0.2(改良MS培养基减少了一些大量元素用量,加倍了一些微量元素用量); 相似文献
13.
吊石苣苔的组织培养与快速繁殖 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
1植物名称吊石苣苔(Lysionotus pauciflorus Maxim.),别名石矼豆、石吊兰。2材料类别幼嫩叶片。3培养条件(1)愈伤组织和不定芽诱导培养基:MS+6-BA3.0mg·L-1(单位下同);(2)增殖与继代培养基:MS+6-BA3.0+NAA0.1; 相似文献
14.
山嵛菜是一种重要的经济植物,用于医药、食品加工等领域。取山嵛菜带腋芽茎段作为外植体进行组织培养,利用长出的新芽直接诱导生成丛生芽。结果表明:MS+BA2.0mg/L+NAA0.05mg/L为最佳的丛生芽诱导和增殖培养基;生根较适宜的培养基为1/2MS+NAA0.05mg/L。 相似文献
15.
16.
17.
18.
五角枫种群表型多样性 总被引:6,自引:2,他引:6
为揭示五角枫种群的表型分化程度、变异模式及地理变异规律,以山西19个种群为研究对象,采用巢式方差分析、相关分析、聚类分析等方法从形态学角度对五角枫种群的叶片、果实、种子等23个表型性状进行了系统分析。结果表明:(1)五角枫23个表型性状中除果柄长、着生痕、种子长/宽以外,其余20个表型性状在种群间和种群内均存在显著和极显著差异。(2)19个种群的平均变异系数为18.07。叶片、果实、种子的平均表型变异系数依次为:果实19.78%叶片18.77%种子10.25%。(3)五角枫种群间表型分化系数(VST)均值为48.82%,种群内变异(51.18%)与种群间变异(48.82%)基本相当。叶片、果实、种子表型分化系数的平均值为:叶片58.08%果实41.24%种子25.87%。(4)五角枫叶片、果实和种子的信息多样性指数(H)为:叶片6.1079果实5.9118种子5.2855;多样性指数平均值(D)分别为:果实0.9967叶片0.9961种子0.9948。(5)主成分分析结果显示:五角枫种群表型多样性基本来源为:叶片贡献率果实贡献率种子贡献率。(6)五角枫表型变异呈现出以经度和纬度变异并存的趋势,少数表型性状与经度和纬度呈现显著或极显著相关。(7)利用欧氏距离对五角枫种群进行UPGMA聚类分析,将五角枫19个种群划分为两大类群。五角枫种群具有较高的表型多样性,种群间和种群内均存在丰富的表型变异,与其遗传特点和分布生境等密切相关,研究结果为今后五角枫种质资源的保护和利用奠定了基础。 相似文献
19.
Although cavitation is common in plants, it is unknown whether the cavitation resistance of xylem is seasonally constant or variable. We tested the changes in cavitation resistance of Acer mono before and after a controlled cavitation–refilling and freeze–thaw cycles for a whole year. Cavitation resistance was determined from ‘vulnerability curves’ showing the percent loss of conductivity versus xylem tension. Cavitation fatigue was defined as a reduction of cavitation resistance following a cavitation–refilling cycle, whereas frost fatigue was caused by a freeze–thaw cycle. A. mono developed seasonal changes in native embolisms; values were relatively high during winter but relatively low and constant throughout the growing season. Cavitation fatigue occurred and changed seasonally during the 12‐month cycle; the greatest fatigue response occurred during summer and the weakest during winter, and the transitions occurred during spring and autumn. A. mono was highly resistant to frost damage during the relatively mild winter months; however, a quite different situation occurred during the growing season, as the seasonal trend of frost fatigue was strikingly similar to that of cavitation fatigue. Seasonality changes in cavitation resistance may be caused by seasonal changes in the mechanical properties of the pit membranes. 相似文献