Structure of membrane‐associated neuronal SNARE complex: implication in neurotransmitter release

To enable fusion between biological membranes, t‐SNAREs and v‐SNARE present in opposing bilayers, interact and assemble in a circular configuration forming ring‐complexes, which establish continuity between the opposing membranes, in presence of calcium ions. The size of a t‐/v‐SNARE ring complex is dictated by the curvature of the opposing membrane. Hence smaller vesicles form small SNARE‐ring complexes, as opposed to large vesicles. Neuronal communication depends on the fusion of 40–50 nm in diameter membrane‐bound synaptic vesicles containing neurotransmitters at the nerve terminal. At the presynaptic membrane, 12–17 nm in diameter cup‐shaped neuronal porosomes are present where synaptic vesicles transiently dock and fuse. Studies demonstrate the presence of SNAREs at the porosome base. Atomic force microscopy (AFM), electron microscopy (EM), and electron density measurement studies demonstrate that at the porosome base, where synaptic vesicles dock and transiently fuse, proteins, possibly comprised of t‐SNAREs, are found assembled in a ring conformation. To further determine the structure and arrangement of the neuronal t‐/v‐SNARE complex, 50 nm t‐and v‐SNARE proteoliposomes were mixed, allowing t‐SNARE‐vesicles to interact with v‐SNARE vesicles, followed by detergent solubilization and imaging of the resultant t‐/v‐SNARE complexes formed using both AFM and EM. Our results demonstrate formation of 6–7 nm membrane‐directed self‐assembled t‐/v‐SNARE ring complexes, similar to, but twice as large as the ring structures present at the base of neuronal porosomes. The smaller SNARE ring at the porosome base may reflect the 3–4 nm base diameter, where 40–50 nm in diameter v‐SNARE‐associated synaptic vesicle transiently dock and fuse to release neurotransmitters.     

HOPS prevents the disassembly of trans‐SNARE complexes by Sec17p/Sec18p during membrane fusion

SNARE‐dependent membrane fusion requires the disassembly of cis‐SNARE complexes (formed by SNAREs anchored to one membrane) followed by the assembly of trans‐SNARE complexes (SNAREs anchored to two apposed membranes). Although SNARE complex disassembly and assembly might be thought to be opposing reactions, the proteins promoting disassembly (Sec17p/Sec18p) and assembly (the HOPS complex) work synergistically to support fusion. We now report that trans‐SNARE complexes formed during vacuole fusion are largely associated with Sec17p. Using a reconstituted proteoliposome fusion system, we show that trans‐SNARE complex, like cis‐SNARE complex, is sensitive to Sec17p/Sec18p mediated disassembly. Strikingly, HOPS inhibits the disassembly of SNARE complexes in the trans‐, but not in the cis‐, configuration. This selective HOPS preservation of trans‐SNARE complexes requires HOPS:SNARE recognition and is lost when the apposed bilayers are dissolved in Triton X‐100; it is also observed during fusion of isolated vacuoles. HOPS thus directs the Sec17p/Sec18p chaperone system to maximize functional trans‐SNARE complex for membrane fusion, a new role of tethering factors during membrane traffic.     

SNARE assembly and membrane fusion, a kinetic analysis

SNARE (soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptor) assembly may promote intracellular membrane fusion, an essential process for vesicular transport in cells. Core complex formation between vesicle-associated SNARE and target membrane SNARE perhaps drives the merging of two membranes into a single bilayer. Using spin-labeling EPR, trans-SNARE complex formation was monitored "locally" at four different core locations of recombinant yeast SNAREs, which are individually reconstituted into phospholipid vesicles. The results indicate that the time scales of core formation are virtually the same at all four locations throughout the core region, indicating the possibility of a single step core assembly, which appears to be somewhat different from what has been postulated by the "zipper" model. The EPR data were then compared with the kinetics of the lipid mixing measured with the fluorescence assay. The analysis suggests that SNARE core assembly occurs on a much faster time scale than the lipid mixing, providing a new insight into the timing of individual events in SNARE-induced membrane fusion.     

Calcium drives fusion of SNARE-apposed bilayers

N-ethylmalemide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptor (SNARE) has been proposed to play a critical role in the membrane fusion process. The SNARE complex was suggested to be the minimal fusion machinery. However, there is mounting evidence for a major role of calcium in membrane fusion. Hence, the role of calcium in SNARE-induced membrane fusion was the focus of this study. It revealed that recombinant v-SNARE and t-SNARE, reconstituted into separate liposomes, interact to bring lipid vesicles into close proximity, enabling calcium to drive fusion of opposing bilayers. Exposure to calcium triggered vesicle fusion at both, high potency and efficacy. The half-time for calcium-induced fusion of SNARE-reconstituted vesicles was determined to be approximately 10 s, which is two orders of magnitude faster than in its absence. Calcium acts downstream of SNAREs, since the presence of SNAREs in bilayers increases the potency of calcium-induced vesicle fusion, without significantly influencing its efficacy. Hence, this study suggests that in the physiological state in cells, both SNAREs and calcium operate as the minimal fusion machinery.     

Constitutive versus regulated SNARE assembly: a structural basis

SNARE complex formation is essential for intracellular membrane fusion. Vesicle-associated (v-) SNARE intertwines with target membrane (t-) SNARE to form a coiled coil that bridges two membranes and facilitates fusion. For the SNARE family involved in neuronal communications, complex formation is tightly regulated by the v-SNARE-membrane interactions. However, it was found using EPR that complex formation is spontaneous for a different SNARE family that is involved in protein trafficking in yeast. Further, reconstituted yeast SNAREs promoted membrane fusion, different from the inhibited fusion for reconstituted neuronal SNAREs. The EPR structural analysis showed that none of the coiled-coil residues of yeast v-SNARE is buried in the hydrophobic layer of the membrane, making the entire coiled-coil motif accessible, again different from the deep insertion of the membrane-proximal region of neuronal v-SNARE into the bilayer. Importantly, yeast membrane fusion is constitutively active, while synaptic membrane fusion is regulated, consistent with the present results for two SNARE families. Thus, the v-SNARE-membrane interaction may be a major molecular determinant for regulated versus constitutive membrane fusion in cells.     

Determinants of synaptobrevin regulation in membranes

Neuronal exocytosis is driven by the formation of SNARE complexes between synaptobrevin 2 on synaptic vesicles and SNAP-25/syntaxin 1 on the plasma membrane. It has remained controversial, however, whether SNAREs are constitutively active or whether they are down-regulated until fusion is triggered. We now show that synaptobrevin in proteoliposomes as well as in purified synaptic vesicles is constitutively active. Potential regulators such as calmodulin or synaptophysin do not affect SNARE activity. Substitution or deletion of residues in the linker connecting the SNARE motif and transmembrane region did not alter the kinetics of SNARE complex assembly or of SNARE-mediated fusion of liposomes. Remarkably, deletion of C-terminal residues of the SNARE motif strongly reduced fusion activity, although the overall stability of the complexes was not affected. We conclude that although complete zippering of the SNARE complex is essential for membrane fusion, the structure of the adjacent linker domain is less critical, suggesting that complete SNARE complex assembly not only connects membranes but also drives fusion.     

A partially zipped SNARE complex stabilized by the membrane

The SNARE complex acts centrally for intracellular membrane fusion, an essential process for vesicular transport in cells. Association between vesicle-associated (v-) SNARE and target membrane (t-) SNARE results in the coiled coil core that bridges two membranes. Here, the structure of the SNARE complex assembled by recombinant t-SNARE Sso1p/Sec9 and v-SNARE Snc2p, which are involved in post-Golgi trafficking in yeast, was investigated using EPR. In detergent solutions, SNAREs formed a fully assembled core. However, when t-SNAREs were reconstituted into the proteoliposome and mixed with the soluble SNARE motif of Snc2p, a partially zipped core in which the N-terminal region is structured, whereas the C-terminal region is frayed, was detected. The partially zipped and fully assembled complexes coexisted with little free energy difference between them. Thus, the core complex formation of yeast SNAREs might not serve as the energy source for the fusion, which is different from what has been known for neuronal SNAREs. On the other hand, the results from the proteoliposome fusion assay, employing cysteine- and nitroxide-scanning mutants of Sso1p, suggested that the formation of the complete core is required for membrane fusion. This implies that core SNARE assembly plays an essential role in setting up the proper geometry of the lipid-protein complex for the successful fusion.     

‘Porosome’ discovered nearly 20 years ago provides molecular insights into the kiss‐and‐run mechanism of cell secretion

Secretion is a fundamental cellular process in living organisms, from yeast to cells in humans. Since the 1950s, it was believed that secretory vesicles completely merged with the cell plasma membrane during secretion. While this may occur, the observation of partially empty vesicles in cells following secretion suggests the presence of an additional mechanism that allows partial discharge of intra‐vesicular contents during secretion. This proposed mechanism requires the involvement of a plasma membrane structure called ‘porosome’, which serves to prevent the collapse of secretory vesicles, and to transiently fuse with the plasma membrane (Kiss‐and‐run), expel a portion of its contents and disengage. Porosomes are cup‐shaped supramolecular lipoprotein structures at the cell plasma membrane ranging in size from 15 nm in neurons and astrocytes to 100–180 nm in endocrine and exocrine cells. Neuronal porosomes are composed of nearly 40 proteins. In comparison, the 120 nm nuclear pore complex is composed of >500 protein molecules. Elucidation of the porosome structure, its chemical composition and functional reconstitution into artificial lipid membrane, and the molecular assembly of membrane‐associated t‐SNARE and v‐SNARE proteins in a ring or rosette complex resulting in the establishment of membrane continuity to form a fusion pore at the porosome base, has been demonstrated. Additionally, the molecular mechanism of secretory vesicle swelling, and its requirement for intra‐vesicular content release during cell secretion has also been elucidated. Collectively, these observations provide a molecular understanding of cell secretion, resulting in a paradigm shift in our understanding of the secretory process.     

Munc13 homology domain-1 in CAPS/UNC31 mediates SNARE binding required for priming vesicle exocytosis

Neuropeptide and peptide hormone secretion from neural and endocrine cells occurs by Ca(2+)-triggered dense-core vesicle exocytosis. The membrane fusion machinery consisting of vesicle and plasma membrane SNARE proteins needs to be assembled for Ca(2+)-triggered vesicle exocytosis. The related Munc13 and CAPS/UNC31 proteins that prime vesicle exocytosis are proposed to promote SNARE complex assembly. CAPS binds SNARE proteins and stimulates SNARE complex formation on liposomes, but the relevance of SNARE binding to CAPS function in cells had not been determined. Here we identify a core SNARE-binding domain in CAPS as corresponding to Munc13 homology domain-1 (MHD1). CAPS lacking a single helix in MHD1 was unable to bind SNARE proteins or to support the Ca(2+)-triggered exocytosis of either docked or newly arrived dense-core vesicles. The results show that MHD1 is a SNARE-binding domain and that SNARE protein binding is essential for CAPS function in dense-core vesicle exocytosis.     

α-SNAP Interferes with the Zippering of the SNARE Protein Membrane Fusion Machinery

Neuronal exocytosis is mediated by soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptor (SNARE) proteins. Before fusion, SNARE proteins form complexes bridging the membrane followed by assembly toward the C-terminal membrane anchors, thus initiating membrane fusion. After fusion, the SNARE complex is disassembled by the AAA-ATPase N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor that requires the cofactor α-SNAP to first bind to the assembled SNARE complex. Using chromaffin granules and liposomes we now show that α-SNAP on its own interferes with the zippering of membrane-anchored SNARE complexes midway through the zippering reaction, arresting SNAREs in a partially assembled trans-complex and preventing fusion. Intriguingly, the interference does not result in an inhibitory effect on synaptic vesicles, suggesting that membrane properties also influence the final outcome of α-SNAP interference with SNARE zippering. We suggest that binding of α-SNAP to the SNARE complex affects the ability of the SNARE complex to harness energy or transmit force to the membrane.     

A search for synthetic peptides that inhibit soluble N-ethylmaleimide sensitive-factor attachment receptor-mediated membrane fusion

Soluble N-ethylmaleimide sensitive-factor attachment receptor (SNARE) proteins have crucial roles in driving exocytic membrane fusion. Molecular recognition between vesicle-associated (v)-SNARE and target membrane (t)-SNARE leads to the formation of a four-helix bundle, which facilitates the merging of two apposing membranes. Synthetic peptides patterned after the SNARE motifs are predicted to block SNARE complex formation by competing with the parental SNAREs, inhibiting neuronal exocytosis. As an initial attempt to identify the peptide sequences that block SNARE assembly and membrane fusion, we created thirteen 17-residue synthetic peptides derived from the SNARE motifs of v- and t-SNAREs. The effects of these peptides on SNARE-mediated membrane fusion were investigated using an in vitro lipid-mixing assay, in vivo neurotransmitter release and SNARE complex formation assays in PC12 cells. Peptides derived from the N-terminal region of SNARE motifs had significant inhibitory effects on neuroexocytosis, whereas middle- and C-terminal-mimicking peptides did not exhibit much inhibitory function. N-terminal mimicking peptides blocked N-terminal zippering of SNAREs, a rate-limiting step in SNARE-driven membrane fusion. Therefore, the results suggest that the N-terminal regions of SNARE motifs are excellent targets for the development of drugs to block SNARE-mediated membrane fusion and neurotransmitter release.     

神经递质释放过程中的可溶性NSF附着蛋白受体(SNARE)和相关蛋白

近年来,对突触小泡释放神经递质分子机制的研究迅速发展,发现了大量位于神经末梢的蛋白质.它们之间的相互作用与突触小泡释放神经递质相关,特别是位于突触小泡膜上的突触小泡蛋白/突触小泡相关膜蛋白(synaptobrevin/VAMP),位于突触前膜上的syntaxin和突触小体相关蛋白(synaptosome-associated protein of 25 ku),三者聚合形成的可溶性NSF附着蛋白受体(SNARE)核心复合体在突触小泡的胞裂外排、释放递质过程中有重要作用.而一些已知及未知的与SNARE蛋白有相互作用的蛋白质,可通过调节SNARE核心复合体的形成与解离来影响突触小泡的胞裂外排,从而可以调节突触信号传递的效率及强度,在突触可塑性的形成中起重要作用.     

SNARE Complex Zipping as a Driving Force in the Dilation of Proteinaceous Fusion Pores

The assembly of SNARE proteins into a tight complex has been hypothesized to drive membrane fusion. A model of the initial fusion pore as a proteinaceous channel formed by SNARE proteins places their membrane anchors in separate membranes. This leaves the possibility of a final assembly step that brings the membrane anchors together and drives fusion pore expansion. The present study develops a model for expansion in which the final SNARE complex zipping step drives a transition from a proteinaceous fusion pore to a lipidic fusion pore. An estimate of the energy released upon merger of the helical segments of the SNARE motifs with the helical segments of the membrane anchors indicates that completing the assembly of a few SNARE complexes can overcome the elastic energy that opposes lipid bilayer deformation into a narrow fusion pore. The angle between the helical axes of the membrane anchor and SNARE motif serves as a useful reaction coordinate for this transition. Energy was calculated as a function of this angle, incorporating contributions from membrane bending, SNARE complex assembly, membrane anchor flexing and hydrophobic interactions. The rate of this transition was evaluated as a process of diffusion over the barrier imposed by these combined energies, and the rates estimated were consistent with experimental measurements.     

Single SNARE-mediated vesicle fusion observed in vitro by polarized TIRFM

Single-vesicle fusion assays in vitro are useful tools for examining mechanisms of membrane fusion at the molecular level mediated by soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptors (SNAREs). This approach allows the experimentalist to define the lipid and protein composition of the two fusing membranes and perform experiments under highly controlled conditions. In previous experiments, in which we reconstituted a SNARE acceptor complex into supported membranes and observed the docking and fusion of fluorescently labeled synaptobrevin proteoliposomes by total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy with millisecond time resolution, we were able to determine the optimal number of SNARE complexes needed for fast fusion. Here, we utilize this assay in combination with polarized total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy to investigate topology changes that vesicles undergo after the onset of fusion. The theory that describes the fluorescence intensity during the transformation of a single vesicle from a spherical particle to a flat membrane patch is developed and confirmed by experiments with three different fluorescent probes. Our results show that on average, the fusing vesicles flatten and merge into the planar membrane within 8 ms after fusion starts.     

Synip Arrests Soluble N-Ethylmaleimide-sensitive Factor Attachment Protein Receptor (SNARE)-dependent Membrane Fusion as a Selective Target Membrane SNARE-binding Inhibitor

The vesicle fusion reaction in regulated exocytosis requires the concerted action of soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptor (SNARE) core fusion engine and a group of SNARE-binding regulatory factors. The regulatory mechanisms of vesicle fusion remain poorly understood in most exocytic pathways. Here, we reconstituted the SNARE-dependent vesicle fusion reaction of GLUT4 exocytosis in vitro using purified components. Using this defined fusion system, we discovered that the regulatory factor synip binds to GLUT4 exocytic SNAREs and inhibits the docking, lipid mixing, and content mixing of the fusion reaction. Synip arrests fusion by binding the target membrane SNARE (t-SNARE) complex and preventing the initiation of ternary SNARE complex assembly. Although synip also interacts with the syntaxin-4 monomer, it does not inhibit the pairing of syntaxin-4 with SNAP-23. Interestingly, synip selectively arrests the fusion reactions reconstituted with its cognate SNAREs, suggesting that the defined system recapitulates the biological functions of the vesicle fusion proteins. We further showed that the inhibitory function of synip is dominant over the stimulatory activity of Sec1/Munc18 proteins. Importantly, the inhibitory function of synip is distinct from how other fusion inhibitors arrest SNARE-dependent membrane fusion and therefore likely represents a novel regulatory mechanism of vesicle fusion.     

SNAREs and the specificity of membrane fusion

A major problem of intracellular membrane traffic concerns the way in which transport vesicles find and fuse with their target organelles. SNARE proteins are involved in fusion, and their mutual recognition could in principle provide the necessary specificity. Alternatively, the preliminary tethering of vesicles, mediated by peripheral membrane proteins, could hold the key. Previous studies of SNARE complex assembly in solution have suggested little specificity, but recent experiments with yeast SNAREs anchored in liposomes show that their interactions can be highly selective. It is likely that both tethering and SNARE engagement contribute to the accuracy of membrane transport.     

Subunit structure of a mammalian ER/Golgi SNARE complex

SNAP receptor (SNARE) complexes bridge opposing membranes to promote membrane fusion within the secretory and endosomal pathways. Because only the exocytic SNARE complexes have been characterized in detail, the structural features shared by SNARE complexes from different fusion steps are not known. We now describe the subunit structure, assembly, and regulation of a quaternary SNARE complex, which appears to mediate an early step in endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to Golgi transport. Purified recombinant syntaxin 5, membrin, and rbet1, three Q-SNAREs, assemble cooperatively to create a high affinity binding site for sec22b, an R-SNARE. The syntaxin 5 amino-terminal domain potently inhibits SNARE complex assembly. The ER/Golgi quaternary complex is remarkably similar to the synaptic complex, suggesting that a common pattern is followed at all transport steps, where three Q-helices assemble to form a high affinity binding site for a fourth R-helix on an opposing membrane. Interestingly, although sec22b binds to the combination of syntaxin 5, membrin, and rbet1, it can only bind if it is present while the others assemble; sec22b cannot bind to a pre-assembled ternary complex of syntaxin 5, membrin, and rbet1. Finally, we demonstrate that the quaternary complex containing sec22b is not an in vitro entity only, but is a bona fide species in living cells.     

Mixed and non-cognate SNARE complexes. Characterization of assembly and biophysical properties.

Assembly of soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive fusion attachment protein receptor (SNARE) proteins between two opposing membranes is thought to be the key event that initiates membrane fusion. Many new SNARE proteins have recently been localized to distinct intracellular compartments, supporting the view that sets of specific SNAREs are specialized for distinct trafficking steps. We have now investigated whether other SNAREs can form complexes with components of the synaptic SNARE complex including synaptobrevin/VAMP 2, SNAP-25, and syntaxin 1. When the Q-SNAREs syntaxin 2, 3, and 4, and the R-SNARE endobrevin/VAMP 8 were used in various combinations, heat-resistant complexes were formed. Limited proteolysis revealed that these complexes contained a protease-resistant core similar to that of the synaptic complex. All complexes were disassembled by the ATPase N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive fusion protein and its cofactor alpha-SNAP. Circular dichroism spectroscopy showed that major conformational changes occur during assembly, which are associated with induction of structure from unstructured monomers. Furthermore, no preference for synaptobrevin was observed during the assembly of the synaptic complex when endobrevin/VAMP 8 was present in equal concentrations. We conclude that cognate and non-cognate SNARE complexes are very similar with respect to biophysical properties, assembly, and disassembly, suggesting that specificity of membrane fusion in intracellular membrane traffic is not due to intrinsic specificity of SNARE pairing.     

Two Disease-Causing SNAP-25B Mutations Selectively Impair SNARE C-terminal Assembly

Synaptic exocytosis relies on assembly of three soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment receptor (SNARE) proteins into a parallel four-helix bundle to drive membrane fusion. SNARE assembly occurs by stepwise zippering of the vesicle-associated SNARE (v-SNARE) onto a binary SNARE complex on the target plasma membrane (t-SNARE). Zippering begins with slow N-terminal association followed by rapid C-terminal zippering, which serves as a power stroke to drive membrane fusion. SNARE mutations have been associated with numerous diseases, especially neurological disorders. It remains unclear how these mutations affect SNARE zippering, partly due to difficulties to quantify the energetics and kinetics of SNARE assembly. Here, we used single-molecule optical tweezers to measure the assembly energy and kinetics of SNARE complexes containing single mutations I67T/N in neuronal SNARE synaptosomal-associated protein of 25 kDa (SNAP-25B), which disrupt neurotransmitter release and have been implicated in neurological disorders. We found that both mutations significantly reduced the energy of C-terminal zippering by ~ 10 k_BT, but did not affect N-terminal assembly. In addition, we observed that both mutations lead to unfolding of the C-terminal region in the t-SNARE complex. Our findings suggest that both SNAP-25B mutations impair synaptic exocytosis by destabilizing SNARE assembly, rather than stabilizing SNARE assembly as previously proposed. Therefore, our measurements provide insights into the molecular mechanism of the disease caused by SNARE mutations.     

Escherichia coli Exposure Inhibits Exocytic SNARE‐Mediated Membrane Fusion in Mast Cells

Mast cells orchestrate the allergic response through the release of proinflammatory mediators, which is driven by the fusion of cytoplasmic secretory granules with the plasma membrane. During this process, SNARE proteins including Syntaxin4, SNAP23 and VAMP8 play a key role. Following stimulation, the kinase IKKβ interacts with and phosphorylates the t‐SNARE SNAP23. Phosphorylated SNAP23 then associates with Syntaxin4 and the v‐SNARE VAMP8 to form a ternary SNARE complex, which drives membrane fusion and mediator release. Interestingly, mast cell degranulation is impaired following exposure to bacteria such as Escherichia coli. However, the molecular mechanism(s) by which this occurs is unknown. Here, we show that E. coli exposure rapidly and additively inhibits degranulation in the RBL‐2H3 rat mast cell line. Following co‐culture with E. coli, the interaction between IKKβ and SNAP23 is disrupted, resulting in the hypophosphorylation of SNAP23. Subsequent formation of the ternary SNARE complex between SNAP23, Syntaxin4 and VAMP8 is strongly reduced. Collectively, these results demonstrate that E. coli exposure inhibits the formation of VAMP8‐containing exocytic SNARE complexes and thus the release of VAMP8‐dependent granules by interfering with SNAP23 phosphorylation.