Neuronal polarity in C. elegans

Neuronal polarity sets the foundation for information processing and signal transmission within neural networks. However, fundamental question of how a neuron develops and maintains structurally and functionally distinct processes, axons and dendrites, is still an unclear. The simplicity and availability of practical genetic tools makes C. elegans as an ideal model to study neuronal polarity in vivo. In recent years, new studies have identified critical polarity molecules that function at different stages of neuronal polarization in C. elegans. This review focuses on how neurons guided by extrinsic cues, break symmetry, and subsequently recruit intracellular molecules to establish and maintain axon-dendrite polarity in vivo.     

Neuronal polarity and trafficking

Among the most morphologically complex cells, neurons are masters of membrane specialization. Nowhere is this more striking than in the division of cellular labor between the axon and the dendrites. In morphology, signaling properties, cytoskeletal organization, and physiological function, axons and dendrites (or more properly, the somatodendritic compartment) are radically different. Such polarization of neurons into domains specialized for either receiving (dendrites) or transmitting (axons) cellular signals provides the underpinning for all neural circuitry. The initial specification of axonal and dendritic identity occurs early in neuronal life, persists for decades, and is manifested by the presence of very different sets of cell surface proteins. Yet, how neuronal polarity is established, how distinct axonal and somatodendritic domains are maintained, and how integral membrane proteins are directed to dendrites or accumulate in axons remain enduring and formidable questions in neuronal cell biology.     

Neuronal polarity: remodeling microtubule organization

1. Download : Download high-res image (117KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

     

Neuronal polarity: demarcation, growth and commitment

In a biological sense, polarity refers to the extremity of the main axis of an organelle, cell, or organism. In neurons, morphological polarity begins with the appearance of the first neurite from the cell body. In multipolar neurons, a second phase of polarization occurs when a single neurite initiates a phase of rapid growth to become the neuron's axon, while the others later differentiate as dendrites. Finally, during a third phase, axons and dendrites develop an elaborate architecture, acquiring special morphological and molecular features that commit them to their final identities. Mechanistically, each phase must be preceded by spatial restriction of growth activity. We will review recent work on the mechanisms underlying the polarized growth of neurons.     

Neuronal polarity: until GSK-3 do us part

Specification of the axon and dendrites is a critical step in the development of a neuron. Two new studies have shed light on the molecular pathway that controls the establishment of neuronal polarity.     

Neuronal polarity: from extracellular signals to intracellular mechanisms

After they are born and differentiate, neurons break their previous symmetry, dramatically change their shape, and establish two structurally and functionally distinct compartments - axons and dendrites - within one cell. How do neurons develop their morphologically and molecularly distinct compartments? Recent studies have implicated several signalling pathways evoked by extracellular signals as having essential roles in a number of aspects of neuronal polarization.     

Neuronal polarity in Drosophila: sorting out axons and dendrites

Drosophila neurons have identifiable axons and dendrites based on cell shape, but it is only just starting to become clear how Drosophila neurons are polarized at the molecular level. Dendrite-specific components including the Golgi complex, GABA receptors, neurotransmitter receptor scaffolding proteins, and cell adhesion molecules have been described. Proteins involved in constructing presynaptic specializations are concentrated in axons of some neurons. A very simple model for how these components are distributed to axons and dendrites can be constructed based on the opposite polarity of microtubules in axons and dendrites: dynein carries cargo into dendrites, and kinesins carry cargo into axons. The simple model works well for multipolar neurons, but will likely need refinement for unipolar neurons, which are common in Drosophila.     

Neuronal polarity: targeting of microtubule components into axons and dendrites

The functional polarity of nerve cells depends on the outgrowth of both axons and dendrites. These processes, which were distinguished by morphological and physiological criteria, have been shown in recent years to differ in molecular composition, including their cytoskeleton. The asymmetric distribution of cytoskeletal elements and, particularly, the segregation of microtubule-associated proteins by their differential transport, may play an important role in the assembly of distinct microtubules in the two neuronal domains. An additional mechanism to achieve this subcellular localization is the transport of specific mRNAs to allow the local synthesis of specific proteins close to their functional site. This may endow the cell with a rapid mechanism for the regulation of synthesis under special conditions, which may be important during neuronal development and plasticity.     

Neuronal (bi)polarity as a self-organized process enhanced by growing membrane

Early in vitro and recent in vivo studies demonstrated that neuronal polarization occurs by the sequential formation of two oppositely located neurites. This early bipolar phenotype is of crucial relevance in brain organization, determining neuronal migration and brain layering. It is currently considered that the place of formation of the first neurite is dictated by extrinsic cues, through the induction of localized changes in membrane and cytoskeleton dynamics leading to deformation of the cells' curvature followed by the growth of a cylindrical extension (neurite). It is unknown if the appearance of the second neurite at the opposite pole, thus the formation of a bipolar cell axis and capacity to undergo migration, is defined by the growth at the first place, therefore intrinsic, or requires external determinants. We addressed this question by using a mathematical model based on the induction of dynamic changes in one pole of a round cell. The model anticipates that a second area of growth can spontaneously form at the opposite pole. Hence, through mathematical modeling we prove that neuronal bipolar axis of growth can be due to an intrinsic mechanism.     

Neuronal specification.

Cell fate specification, a central problem in developmental biology, presents an intriguing challenge in the studies of neural development. How are certain cells in the embryonic ectoderm selected to be neuronal precursors? How do individual neuronal precursors and their progeny cells acquire their own identity? These are just some of the questions that recent developments have begun to elucidate.     

Neuronal migration.

Like other motile cells, neurons migrate in three schematic steps, namely leading edge extension, nuclear translocation or nucleokinesis, and retraction of the trailing process. In addition, neurons are ordered into architectonic patterns at the end of migration. Leading edge extension can proceed at the extremity of the axon, by growth cone formation, or from the dendrites, by formation of dendritic tips. Among both categories of leading edges, variation seems to be related to the rate of extension of the leading process. Leading edge extension is directed by microfilament polymerization following integration of extracellular cues and is regulated by Rho-type small GTPases. In humans, mutations of filamin, an actin-associated protein, result in heterotopic neurons, probably due to defective leading edge extension. The second event in neuron migration is nucleokinesis, a process which is critically dependent on the microtubule network, as shown in many cell types, from slime molds to vertebrates. In humans, mutations in the PAFAH1B1 gene (more commonly called LIS1) or in the doublecortin (DCX) gene result in type 1 lissencephalies that are most probably due to defective nucleokinesis. Both the Lis1 and doublecortin proteins interact with microtubules, and two Lis1-interacting proteins, Nudel and mammalian NudE, are components of the dynein motor complex and of microtubule organizing centers. In mice, mutations of Cdk5 or of its activators p35 and p39 result in a migration phenotype compatible with defective nucleokinesis, although an effect on leading edge formation is also likely. The formation of architectonic patterns at the end of migration requires the integrity of the Reelin signalling pathway. Other known components of the pathway include members of the lipoprotein receptor family, the intracellular adaptor Dab1, and possibly integrin alpha 3 beta 1. Defective Reelin leads to poor lamination and, in humans, to a lissencephaly phenotype different from type 1 lissencephaly. Although the action of Reelin is unknown, it may trigger some recognition-adhesion among target neurons. Finally, pattern formation requires the integrity of the external limiting membrane, defects of which lead to overmigration of neurons in meninges and to human type 2 lissencephaly.     

Neuronal responses are differentially affected by the polarity of tectal DC stimulation in the toad Bufo bufo

Male toads were tested behaviourally for their prey catching responses to worm-like stimuli before being prepared for visual unit and slow potential shift (SPS) recording from the optic tectum. The neuronal responses of toads to a prey-like visual stimulus reflected their motivational tendency prior to operations. One second of DC stimulation to the tectum was followed by an SPS of reversed polarity during which time a visual prey-like stimulus was presented. A negative SPS following positive DC stimulation was associated with enhanced neuronal responses to a visual stimulus. The positive SPS that followed negative stimulation was associated with a decline in neural responses below background when a visual stimulus was additionally given. The SPS was largely a result of DC stimulation that interacted with the motivational tendency to produce enhanced neuronal responses, while the potential was negative and vice versa.     

Neuronal membrane lipid asymmetry.

The outer surface of intact synaptosomes was covalently labelled with trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid prior to isolation of the synaptic plasma membrane. Analysis of the membrane lipid demonstrated an asymmetric distribution of phospholipids across the synaptosomal plasma membrane. In addition, the fatty acyl composition of phosphatidylethanolamine from this neuronal membrane fraction was also distributed asymmetrically. The data are consistent with a $\text{de novo}$ generation of phospholipid asymmetry independent of serum lipid exchange processes. This structural asymmetry may have important consequences for neurotransmission.