Modulation of induction properties of glucocorticoid receptor-agonist and -antagonist complexes by coactivators involves binding to receptors but is independent of ability of coactivators to augment transactivation

Coactivators such as TIF2 and SRC-1 modulate the positioning of the dose-response curve for agonist-bound glucocorticoid receptors (GRs) and the partial agonist activity of antiglucocorticoid complexes. These properties of coactivators differ from their initially defined activities of binding to, and increasing the total levels of transactivation by, agonist-bound steroid receptors. We now report that constructs of TIF2 and SRC-1 lacking the two activation domains (AD1 and AD2) have significantly less ability to increase transactivation but retain most of the activity for modulating the dose-response curve and partial agonist activity. Mammalian two-hybrid experiments show that the minimum TIF2 segment with modulatory activity (TIF2.4) does not interact with p300, CREB-binding protein, or PCAF, which also modulates GR activities. DRIP150 and DRIP205 have been implicated in coactivator actions but are unable to modulate GR activities. The absence of synergism by PCAF or DRIP150 with SRC-1 or TIF2, respectively, further suggests that these other factors are not involved. The ability of a TIF2.4 fragment (i.e. TIF2.37), which is not known to interact with proteins, to block the actions of TIF2.4 suggests that an unidentified binder mediates the modulatory activity of TIF2. Pull-down experiments with GST/TIF2.4 demonstrate a direct interaction of TIF2 with GR in a hormone-dependent fashion that requires the receptor interaction domains of TIF2 and is equally robust with agonists and most antiglucocorticoids. These observations, which are confirmed in mammalian two-hybrid assays, suggest that the capacity of coactivators such as TIF2 to modulate the partial agonist activity of antisteroids is mediated by the binding of coactivators to GR-antagonist complexes. In conclusion, the modulatory activity of coactivators with GR-agonist and -antagonist complexes is mechanistically distinct from the ability of coactivators to augment the total levels of transactivation and appears to involve the binding to both GR-steroid complexes and an unidentified TIF2-associated factor(s).     

Differential role of two VDR coactivators, DRIP205 and SRC-3, in keratinocyte proliferation and differentiation

Cell programs such as proliferation and differentiation involve the selective activation and repression of gene expression. The vitamin D receptor (VDR), through 1,25(OH)(2)D(3), controls the proliferation and differentiation of keratinocytes. Previously, we have identified two VDR binding coactivator complexes. In proliferating keratinocytes VDR bound preferentially to the DRIP complex, whereas in differentiated keratinocytes the SRC complex was preferred. We proposed that different coactivators are required for sequential gene regulation in the transition from proliferation to differentiation. Here we examined the roles of DRIP205 and SRC-3 in this transition. Silencing of DRIP205 and VDR caused hyperproliferation of keratinocytes, demonstrated by increased XTT and BrdU incorporation. SRC-3 silencing, on the other hand, did not have an effect on proliferation. In contrast, SRC-3 as well as DRIP205 and VDR silencing blocked keratinocyte differentiation as shown by decreased expression of keratin 1 and filaggrin. These results are consistent with the differential localization of DRIP205 and SRC-3 in skin. These results indicate that DRIP205 is required for keratinocyte proliferation. Both DRIP205 and SRC-3 are required for the keratinocyte differentiation. These results support the concept that the selective use of coactivators by VDR underlies the selective regulation of gene expression in keratinocyte proliferation and differentiation.     

The vitamin D receptor interacts preferentially with DRIP205-like LxxLL motifs

The vitamin D receptor (VDR) mediates the biological actions of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25(OH)2D3) through its capacity to recruit coregulatory proteins. This interaction is mediated via a coregulatory LxxLL motif. We screened a combinatorial (x)7LxxLL(x)7 phage library with purified VDR to identify peptides that displayed high affinity and selectivity for VDR. These peptides contained the consensus sequence Lx E/H x H/F P L/M/I LxxLL and exhibited significant sequence similarity to the active LxxLL box found in DRIP205. Nearly all LxxLL peptides interacted in a ligand-dependent manner directly with human VDR. However, a pattern of selectivity of the peptides for other members of the nuclear receptor family was also observed. Interestingly, the interaction between the VDR and many of the peptides was differentially sensitive to a broad assortment of VDR ligands. Finally, several of these peptides were shown to inhibit activation of a 1,25(OH)2D3-sensitive reporter gene. These studies suggest that the LxxLL motif can interact directly with the VDR and that this interaction is regulated by chemically diverse vitamin D ligands.     

Discrete roles for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma and retinoid X receptor in recruiting nuclear receptor coactivators

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma) plays a major role in adipogenesis. PPARgamma binds to DNA as a heterodimer with retinoid X receptor (RXR), and PPARgamma-RXR can be activated by ligands specific for either receptor; the presence of both ligands can result in a cooperative effect on the transactivation of target genes. How these ligands mediate transactivation, however, remains unclear. PPARgamma is known to interact with both the p160/SRC-1 family of coactivators and the distinct, multisubunit coactivator complex called DRIP. A single DRIP subunit, DRIP205 (TRAP220, PBP), binds directly to PPARgamma. Here we report that PPARgamma and RXR selectively interacted with DRIP205 and p160 proteins in a ligand-dependent manner. At physiological concentrations, RXR-specific ligands only induced p160 binding to RXR, and PPARgamma-specific ligands exclusively recruited DRIP205 but not p160 coactivators to PPARgamma. This selectivity was not observed in interaction assays off DNA, implying that the specificity of coactivator binding in response to ligand is strongly influenced by the allosteric effects of DNA-bound heterodimers. These coactivator-selective effects were also observed in transient-transfection assays in the presence of overexpressed p160 or DRIP coactivators. The results suggest that the cooperative effects of PPARgamma- and RXR-specific ligands may occur at the level of selective coactivator recruitment.