Molecular analysis of the prokaryotic ubiquitin‐like protein (Pup) conjugation pathway in Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Proteins targeted for degradation by the Mycobacterium proteasome are post‐translationally tagged with prokaryotic ubiquitin‐like protein (Pup), an intrinsically disordered protein of 64 residues. In a process termed ‘pupylation’, Pup is synthesized with a terminal glutamine, which is deamidated to glutamate by Dop (deamidase of Pup) prior to attachment to substrate lysines by proteasome accessory factor A (PafA). Importantly, PafA was previously shown to be essential to cause lethal infections by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) in mice. In this study we show that Dop, like PafA, is required for the full virulence of Mtb. Additionally, we show that Dop is not only involved in the deamidation of Pup, but also needed to maintain wild‐type steady state levels of pupylated proteins in Mtb. Finally, using structural models and site‐directed mutagenesis our data suggest that Dop and PafA are members of the glutamine synthetase fold family of proteins.     

The mycobacterial Mpa–proteasome unfolds and degrades pupylated substrates by engaging Pup's N‐terminus

Mycobacterium tuberculosis, along with other actinobacteria, harbours proteasomes in addition to members of the general bacterial repertoire of degradation complexes. In analogy to ubiquitination in eukaryotes, substrates are tagged for proteasomal degradation with prokaryotic ubiquitin‐like protein (Pup) that is recognized by the N‐terminal coiled‐coil domain of the ATPase Mpa (also called ARC). Here, we reconstitute the entire mycobacterial proteasome degradation system for pupylated substrates and establish its mechanistic features with respect to substrate recruitment, unfolding and degradation. We show that the Mpa–proteasome complex unfolds and degrades Pup‐tagged proteins and that this activity requires physical interaction of the ATPase with the proteasome. Furthermore, we establish the N‐terminal region of Pup as the structural element required for engagement of pupylated substrates into the Mpa pore. In this process, Mpa pulls on Pup to initiate unfolding of substrate proteins and to drag them toward the proteasome chamber. Unlike the eukaryotic ubiquitin, Pup is not recycled but degraded with the substrate. This assigns a dual function to Pup as both the Mpa recognition element as well as the threading determinant.     

Pupylation as a signal for proteasomal degradation in bacteria

Posttranslational modifications in the form of covalently attached proteins like ubiquitin (Ub), were long considered an exclusive feature of eukaryotic organisms. The discovery of pupylation, the modification of lysine residues with a prokaryotic, ubiquitin-like protein (Pup), demonstrated that certain bacteria use a tagging pathway functionally related to ubiquitination in order to target proteins for proteasomal degradation. However, functional analogies do not translate into structural or mechanistic relatedness. Bacterial Pup, unlike eukaryotic Ub, does not adopt a β-grasp fold, but is intrinsically disordered. Furthermore, isopeptide bond formation in the pupylation process is carried out by enzymes evolutionary descendent from glutamine synthetases. While in eukaryotes, the proteasome is the main energy-dependent protein degradation machine, bacterial proteasomes exist in addition to other architecturally related degradation complexes, and their specific role along with the role of pupylation is still poorly understood. In Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb), the Pup–proteasome system contributes to pathogenicity by supporting the bacterium's persistence within host macrophages. Here, we describe the mechanism and structural framework of pupylation and the targeting of pupylated proteins to the proteasome complex. Particular attention is given to the comparison of the bacterial Pup–proteasome system and the eukaryotic ubiquitin–proteasome system. Furthermore, the involvement of pupylation and proteasomal degradation in Mtb pathogenesis is discussed together with efforts to establish the Pup–proteasome system as a drug target. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Ubiquitin–Proteasome System. Guest Editors: Thomas Sommer and Dieter H. Wolf.     

Dop functions as a depupylase in the prokaryotic ubiquitin‐like modification pathway

Post‐translational modification of proteins with prokaryotic ubiquitin‐like protein (Pup) is the bacterial equivalent of ubiquitination in eukaryotes. Mycobacterial pupylation is a two‐step process in which the carboxy‐terminal glutamine of Pup is first deamidated by Dop (deamidase of Pup) before ligation of the generated γ‐carboxylate to substrate lysines by the Pup ligase PafA. In this study, we identify a new feature of the pupylation system by demonstrating that Dop also acts as a depupylase in the Pup proteasome system in vivo and in vitro. Dop removes Pup from substrates by specific cleavage of the isopeptide bond. Depupylation can be enhanced by the unfolding activity of the mycobacterial proteasomal ATPase Mpa.     

Survival of mycobacteria depends on proteasome‐mediated amino acid recycling under nutrient limitation

Intracellular protein degradation is an essential process in all life domains. While in all eukaryotes regulated protein degradation involves ubiquitin tagging and the 26S‐proteasome, bacterial prokaryotic ubiquitin‐like protein (Pup) tagging and proteasomes are conserved only in species belonging to the phyla Actinobacteria and Nitrospira. In Mycobacterium tuberculosis, the Pup‐proteasome system (PPS) is important for virulence, yet its physiological role in non‐pathogenic species has remained an enigma. We now report, using Mycobacterium smegmatis as a model organism, that the PPS is essential for survival under starvation. Upon nitrogen limitation, PPS activity is induced, leading to accelerated tagging and degradation of many cytoplasmic proteins. We suggest a model in which the PPS functions to recycle amino acids under nitrogen starvation, thereby enabling the cell to maintain basal metabolic activities. We also find that the PPS auto‐regulates its own activity via pupylation and degradation of its components in a manner that promotes the oscillatory expression of PPS components. As such, the destructive activity of the PPS is carefully balanced to maintain cellular functions during starvation.     

Prokaryotic ubiquitin-like protein remains intrinsically disordered when covalently attached to proteasomal target proteins

Background

The post-translational modification pathway referred to as pupylation marks proteins for proteasomal degradation in Mycobacterium tuberculosis and other actinobacteria by covalently attaching the small protein Pup (prokaryotic ubiquitin-like protein) to target lysine residues. In contrast to the functionally analogous eukaryotic ubiquitin, Pup is intrinsically disordered in its free form. Its unfolded state allows Pup to adopt different structures upon interaction with different binding partners like the Pup ligase PafA and the proteasomal ATPase Mpa. While the disordered behavior of free Pup has been well characterized, it remained unknown whether Pup adopts a distinct structure when attached to a substrate.

Results

Using a combination of NMR experiments and biochemical analysis we demonstrate that Pup remains unstructured when ligated to two well-established pupylation substrates targeted for proteasomal degradation in Mycobacterium tuberculosis, malonyl transacylase (FabD) and ketopantoyl hydroxylmethyltransferase (PanB). Isotopically labeled Pup was linked to FabD and PanB by in vitro pupylation to generate homogeneously pupylated substrates suitable for NMR analysis. The single target lysine of PanB was identified by a combination of mass spectroscopy and mutational analysis. Chemical shift comparison between Pup in its free form and ligated to substrate reveals intrinsic disorder of Pup in the conjugate.

Conclusion

When linked to the proteasomal substrates FabD and PanB, Pup is unstructured and retains the ability to interact with its different binding partners. This suggests that it is not the conformation of Pup attached to these two substrates which determines their delivery to the proteasome, but the availability of the degradation complex and the depupylase.

     

Deletion of dop in Mycobacterium smegmatis abolishes pupylation of protein substrates in vivo

Proteasome‐bearing bacteria make use of a ubiquitin‐like modification pathway to target proteins for proteasomal turnover. In a process termed pupylation, proteasomal substrates are covalently modified with the small protein Pup that serves as a degradation signal. Pup is attached to substrate proteins by action of PafA. Prior to its attachment, Pup needs to undergo deamidation at its C‐terminal residue, converting glutamine to glutamate. This step is catalysed in vitro by Dop. In order to characterize Dop activity in vivo, we generated a dop deletion mutant in Mycobacterium smegmatis. In the Δdop strain, pupylation is severely impaired and the steady‐state levels of two known proteasomal substrates are drastically increased. Pupylation can be re‐established by complementing the mutant with either DopWt or a Pup variant carrying a glutamate at its ultimate C‐terminal position (PupGGE). Our data show that Pup is deamidated by Dop in vivo and that likely Dop alone is responsible for this activity. Furthermore, we demonstrate that a putative N‐terminal ATP‐binding motif is crucial for catalysis, as a single point mutation (E10A) in this motif abolishes Dop activity both in vivo and in vitro.     

Activity of the mycobacterial proteasomal ATPase Mpa is reversibly regulated by pupylation

Pupylation is a bacterial post-translational modification of target proteins on lysine residues with prokaryotic ubiquitin-like protein Pup. Pup-tagged substrates are recognized by a proteasome-interacting ATPase termed Mpa in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Mpa unfolds pupylated substrates and threads them into the proteasome core particle for degradation. Interestingly, Mpa itself is also a pupylation target. Here, we show that the Pup ligase PafA predominantly produces monopupylated Mpa modified homogeneously on a single lysine residue within its C-terminal region. We demonstrate that this modification renders Mpa functionally inactive. Pupylated Mpa can no longer support Pup-mediated proteasomal degradation due to its inability to associate with the proteasome core. Mpa is further inactivated by rapid Pup- and ATPase-driven deoligomerization of the hexameric Mpa ring. We show that pupylation of Mpa is chemically and functionally reversible. Mpa regains its enzymatic activity upon depupylation by the depupylase Dop, affording a rapid and reversible activity control over Mpa function.     

A further case of Dop‐ing in bacterial pupylation

Two recent studies, one in this issue of EMBO reports and one in Molecular Cell, identify Dop as a depupylase, ascribing a novel function to Dop and providing further evidence for the functional similarity of the prokaryotic Pup-modification system and the eukaryotic ubiquitin system.EMBO Rep (2010) advance online publication. doi: 10.1038/embor.2010.119Protein homeostasis is fundamental to the function of all cellular systems. In eukaryotes, the ubiquitin–proteasome pathway mediates regulated protein degradation. Intensive studies of the eukaryotic proteasome over the past decades have unravelled the complexity of this multi-subunit, ATP-dependent protease, and proteasome inhibitors are now established anticancer drugs (Finley, 2009). Prokaryotes use ATP-dependent proteases—such as Lon, ClpP and FtsH—for protein degradation. In addition, some bacteria in the class of Actinomycetes have acquired a proteasome which shares sequence and structural homology with its eukaryotic counterpart (Darwin, 2009). The function of the prokaryotic proteasome and its implication in pathogenesis is the subject of ongoing research. In Mycobacterium tuberculosis, proteasome activity is essential for the pathogen to persist in macrophages of the lung epithelium and could therefore be a target for antimicrobial treatment (Darwin, 2009).Labelling substrates for proteasomal degradation is well understood in eukaryotes, in which ubiquitin is attached to proteins that are subsequently recognized by proteasomal subunits and degraded (Finley, 2009). A similar tagging system has recently been identified in M. tuberculosis, in which the prokaryotic ubiquitin-like protein (Pup) serves as a ubiquitin analogue (Pearce et al, 2008). Subsequent proteome-wide studies have identified hundreds of Pup-tagged substrates in different mycobacteria, defining the ‘pupylome'' (Festa et al, 2010; Poulsen et al, 2010). Pupylated proteins are recognized by the proteasome-associated ATPase Mpa, that unfolds proteins before they are degraded in the proteolytic core (Darwin, 2009).Ubiquitination is reversed by specific deubiquitinases, but whether pupylation is also reversible was previously unknown. Two studies by Darwin and colleagues and—in this issue of EMBO reports—by Weber-Ban and colleagues have now demonstrated that Pup is removed from substrates when incubated with mycobacterial lysates (Burns et al, 2010; Imkamp et al, 2010). This suggests the presence of one or more ‘depupylases'', and indicates that pupylation is a complex and versatile process, much like ubiquitination.Pup and ubiquitin conjugation are mechanistically unrelated; ubiquitin is ligated by its carboxy-terminal glycine residue to lysine residues of target proteins by an enzymatic cascade, comprising E1, E2 and E3 enzymes (Dye & Schulman, 2007). By contrast, the pupylation machinery seems to be simpler; a single ligating enzyme, proteasome accessory factor A (PafA), mediates isopeptide bond formation between the C-terminal glutamic acid side-chain carboxyl group of Pup and a substrate lysine residue (Sutter et al, 2010).Only about half of the Pup-containing bacteria encode a glutamic acid residue at the C-terminus (Striebel et al, 2009). In the remaining species, including M. tuberculosis, the Pup gene encodes a C-terminal glutamine, which requires deamidation to glutamic acid before conjugation to substrates can occur. This activating deamidation step is carried out by the deamidase of Pup (Dop; Striebel et al, 2009). Curiously, the dop gene is conserved in all Pup-containing bacterial species (with the exception of Plesiocystis pacifica), including those in which initial deamidation is unnecessary.Imkamp et al and Burns et al now identify Dop as a depupylase in the Pup-modification pathway. Hydrolysis of Pup from model substrates in vitro is abolished in a dop-deficient bacterial lysate, or in lysate expressing a mutant form of dop, but can be restored by complementation with dop. Dop is able to depupylate many proteins when tested against the pupylome, suggesting a broad substrate spectrum. By contrast, without Dop the pupylome is unchanged over time, indicating that Dop might be the main depupylase in Mycobacteria. Purified Dop from M. tuberculosis shows depupylase activity against model substrates. Finally, Imkamp et al analyse a Dop homologue from Corynebacterium glutamicum that encodes Pup^Glu and hence does not depend on deamidation. This Dop homologue is expressed recombinantly and purified from Escherichia coli—which does not harbour the Pup-proteasome system—and shown to be an active depupylase in vitro.Both groups then investigated the functional relationship between Pup/Dop and the proteasomal ATPase Mpa. Burns et al found that Mpa is required in vivo for depupylation of a proteasome substrate. Imkamp et al found that Mpa significantly increases depupylation activity in vitro. The mechanism for this remains unclear, but full-length Pup seems to be essential for Mpa-mediated activation, as depupylation is not enhanced with an amino-terminally truncated Pup. Previous work has indicated that the N-terminus of Pup is required to initiate substrate unfolding (Striebel et al, 2010), and Imkamp et al speculated that unfolding makes the isopeptide bond more accessible for interaction with Dop. Evidence for this comes from the observation that Dop can cleave a peptide substrate with an accessible isopeptide bond at the same rate in the presence or absence of Mpa. It is intriguing that Dop co-purifies with the pupylome (Burns et al, 2010), this suggests that Dop has significant affinity but low activity for pupylated substrates. This might, however, prime the system for depupylation after Mpa interaction.Corynebacteria do not have a proteasome, but maintain the pupylation machinery comprising Pup, PafA, Dop and the proteasomal ATPase ARC (a homologue of Mpa). Here, the fate of Pup-tagged proteins cannot be proteasomal degradation, although substrate unfolding by ARC could initiate degradation by other proteases. However, pupylation in proteasome-deficient bacteria might suggest additional non-degradative functions for pupylation.Both studies demonstrate that Dop acts as a depupylase in Pup-containing bacteria, in addition to the previously reported deamidation role of Dop in mycobacteria. In fact, the chemical reactions underlying depupylation and deamidation are mechanistically similar. The key functional question that remains is whether Dop protects substrates from proteasomal degradation. Alternative explanations are that Dop acts in conjunction with Mpa or the proteasome to recycle Pup, or that it reverses non-degradative roles of pupylation (Fig 1).Open in a separate windowFigure 1Emerging roles for Dop. (A) The pupylation system. (1) Dop functions as a deamidase, converting Pup^Gln to Pup^Glu. PafA ligates Pup^Glu to substrates, which are targeted to Mpa and the proteasome and are degraded. (2) Dop can reverse pupylation on substrates and might rescue substrates from degradation. (B) Dop might act to recycle Pup, either (3a) at the Mpa/proteasome level or (3b) by binding to pupylated substrates, where Mpa-mediated substrate unfolding activates Dop. (C) (4) The existence of Dop in proteasome deficient bacteria might indicate that Dop antagonizes non-degradational roles for Pup. Dop, deamidase of Pup; Mpa, Mycobacterium proteasome-associated ATPase; PafA, proteasome accessory factor A; Pup, prokaryotic ubiquitin-like protein.So far, nothing is known about the regulation of Dop. It will be interesting to analyse expression profiles to determine whether Dop is regulated independently of other proteins in this system. Other open questions remain about the existence of co-factors and binding partners, and the organization of the Pup–Dop–Mpa network. Structural studies of the Dop enzyme will hopefully increase our understanding of its roles in depupylation.In conclusion, Dop in the pupylation system has the potential to combine all known functions of deubiquitinases in the ubiquitin system: processing of precursors, rescuing substrates from degradation, recycling the modifier and reversing potential non-degradative roles of pupylation. The identification of the first depupylase opens an exciting new research field to unravel the functional consequences of depupylation.     

Prokayrotic Ubiquitin-Like Protein (Pup) Proteome of Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Prokaryotic ubiquitin-like protein (Pup) in Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) is the first known post-translational small protein modifier in prokaryotes, and targets several proteins for degradation by a bacterial proteasome in a manner akin to ubiquitin (Ub) mediated proteolysis in eukaryotes. To determine the extent of pupylation in Mtb, we used tandem affinity purification to identify its “pupylome”. Mass spectrometry identified 55 out of 604 purified proteins with confirmed pupylation sites. Forty-four proteins, including those with and without identified pupylation sites, were tested as substrates of proteolysis in Mtb. Under steady state conditions, the majority of the test proteins did not accumulate in degradation mutants, suggesting not all targets of pupylation are necessarily substrates of the proteasome under steady state conditions. Four proteins implicated in Mtb pathogenesis, Icl (isocitrate lyase), Ino1 (inositol-1-phosphate synthase), MtrA (Mtb response regulator A) and PhoP (phosphate response regulator P), showed altered levels in degradation defective Mtb. Icl, Ino1 and MtrA accumulated in Mtb degradation mutants, suggesting these proteins are targeted to the proteasome. Unexpectedly, PhoP was present in wild type Mtb but undetectable in the degradation mutants. Taken together, these data demonstrate that pupylation regulates numerous proteins in Mtb and may not always lead to degradation.     

Pup-蛋白酶体系统的作用机制和生物学功能

Pup-蛋白酶体系统（Pup-proteasome system,PPS）是原核生物的一种翻译后蛋白质修饰降解体系,在去酰胺酶（deamidase of Pup,Dop）和蛋白酶体辅助因子A (proteasome accessory factorA,PafA)两种酶的作用下,原核生物类泛素蛋白（prokaryotic ubiquitin-like protein,Pup）可以标记靶蛋白,并介导靶蛋白经蛋白酶体降解。在分枝杆菌中PPS参与氧化应激、营养缺乏、热激、DNA损伤等多种应激反应,并在金属离子稳态调控、毒素-抗毒素系统（toxin-antitoxin system,TA system）的调节以及抵抗宿主免疫等过程中发挥作用。PPS与结核分枝杆菌（Mycobacterium tuberculosis,Mtb）的持留性和致病性直接相关,因此PPS中的PafA、Dop和蛋白酶体均是抗结核药物开发的新靶点,筛选针对PPS的小分子抑制剂将成为新型抗结核药物研发的一个新途径。此外,Paf A催化的蛋白质Pup化被应用于生物技术的研发,形成了一种新的邻近标记技术——基于Pup化的邻近标记技术...     

Reconstitution of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis pupylation pathway in Escherichia coli

Prokaryotic ubiquitin-like protein (Pup) is a post-translational modifier that attaches to more than 50 proteins in Mycobacteria. Proteasome accessory factor A (PafA) is responsible for Pup conjugation to substrates, but the manner in which proteins are selected for pupylation is unknown. To address this issue, we reconstituted the pupylation of model Mycobacterium proteasome substrates in Escherichia coli, which does not encode Pup or PafA. Surprisingly, Pup and PafA were sufficient to pupylate at least 51 E. coli proteins in addition to the mycobacterial proteins. These data suggest that pupylation signals are intrinsic to targeted proteins and might not require Mycobacterium-specific cofactors for substrate recognition by PafA in vivo.     

Computational Identification of Protein Pupylation Sites by Using Profile-Based Composition of k-Spaced Amino Acid Pairs

Prokaryotic proteins are regulated by pupylation, a type of post-translational modification that contributes to cellular function in bacterial organisms. In pupylation process, the prokaryotic ubiquitin-like protein (Pup) tagging is functionally analogous to ubiquitination in order to tag target proteins for proteasomal degradation. To date, several experimental methods have been developed to identify pupylated proteins and their pupylation sites, but these experimental methods are generally laborious and costly. Therefore, computational methods that can accurately predict potential pupylation sites based on protein sequence information are highly desirable. In this paper, a novel predictor termed as pbPUP has been developed for accurate prediction of pupylation sites. In particular, a sophisticated sequence encoding scheme [i.e. the profile-based composition of k-spaced amino acid pairs (pbCKSAAP)] is used to represent the sequence patterns and evolutionary information of the sequence fragments surrounding pupylation sites. Then, a Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifier is trained using the pbCKSAAP encoding scheme. The final pbPUP predictor achieves an AUC value of 0.849 in10-fold cross-validation tests and outperforms other existing predictors on a comprehensive independent test dataset. The proposed method is anticipated to be a helpful computational resource for the prediction of pupylation sites. The web server and curated datasets in this study are freely available at http://protein.cau.edu.cn/pbPUP/.     

The Mechanism of Mycobacterium smegmatis PafA Self-Pupylation

PafA, the prokaryotic ubiquitin-like protein (Pup) ligase, catalyzes the Pup modification of bacterial proteins and targets the substrates for proteasomal degradation. It has been reported that that M. smegmatis PafA can be poly-pupylated. In this study, the mechanism of PafA self-pupylation is explored. We found that K320 is the major target residue for the pupylation of PafA. During the self-pupylation of PafA, the attachment of the first Pup to PafA is catalyzed by the other PafA molecule through an intermolecular reaction, while the formation of the polymeric Pup chain is carried out in an intramolecular manner through the internal ligase activity of the already pupylated PafA. Among the three lysine residues, K7, K31 and K61, in M. smegmatis Pup, K7 and K31 are involved in the formation of the poly-Pup chain in PafA poly-pupylation. Poly-pupylation of PafA can be reversibly regulated by depupylase Dop. The polymeric Pup chain formed through K7/K31 linkage is much more sensitive to Dop than the mono-Pup directly attached to PafA. Moreover, self-pupylation of PafA is involved in the regulation of its stability in vivo in a proteasome-dependent manner, suggesting that PafA self-pupylation functions as a mechanism in the auto-regulation of the Pup-proteasome system.     

Ubiquitin‐like domains can target to the proteasome but proteolysis requires a disordered region

Ubiquitin and some of its homologues target proteins to the proteasome for degradation. Other ubiquitin‐like domains are involved in cellular processes unrelated to the proteasome, and proteins containing these domains remain stable in the cell. We find that the 10 yeast ubiquitin‐like domains tested bind to the proteasome, and that all 11 identified domains can target proteins for degradation. Their apparent proteasome affinities are not directly related to their stabilities or functions. That is, ubiquitin‐like domains in proteins not part of the ubiquitin proteasome system may bind the proteasome more tightly than domains in proteins that are bona fide components. We propose that proteins with ubiquitin‐like domains have properties other than proteasome binding that confer stability. We show that one of these properties is the absence of accessible disordered regions that allow the proteasome to initiate degradation. In support of this model, we find that Mdy2 is degraded in yeast when a disordered region in the protein becomes exposed and that the attachment of a disordered region to Ubp6 leads to its degradation.     

The pupylation pathway and its role in mycobacteria

Pupylation is a post-translational protein modification occurring in actinobacteria through which the small, intrinsically disordered protein Pup (prokaryotic ubiquitin-like protein) is conjugated to lysine residues of proteins, marking them for proteasomal degradation. Although functionally related to ubiquitination, pupylation is carried out by different enzymes that are evolutionarily linked to bacterial carboxylate-amine ligases. Here, we compare the mechanism of Pup-conjugation to target proteins with ubiquitination, describe the evolutionary emergence of pupylation and discuss the importance of this pathway for survival of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in the host.     

Prokaryotic Ubiquitin-Like Protein Pup Is Intrinsically Disordered

The prokaryotic ubiquitin-like protein Pup targets substrates for degradation by the Mycobacterium tuberculosis proteasome through its interaction with Mpa, an ATPase that is thought to abut the 20S catalytic subunit. Ubiquitin, which is assembled into a polymer to similarly signal for proteasomal degradation in eukaryotes, adopts a stable and compact structural fold that is adapted into other proteins for diverse biological functions. We used NMR spectroscopy to demonstrate that, unlike ubiquitin, the 64-amino-acid protein Pup is intrinsically disordered with small helical propensity in the C-terminal region. We found that the Pup:Mpa interaction involves an extensive contact surface that spans S21-K61 and that the binding is in the “slow exchange” regime on the NMR time scale, thus demonstrating higher affinity than most ubiquitin:ubiquitin receptor pairs. Interestingly, during the titration experiment, intermediate Pup species were observable, suggesting the formation of one or more transient state(s) upon binding. Moreover, Mpa selected one configuration for a region undergoing chemical exchange in the free protein. These findings provide mechanistic insights into Pup's functional role as a degradation signal.