Histone Gene Multiplicity and Position Effect Variegation in DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER

The histone genes of wild-type Drosophila melanogaster are reiterated 100–150 times per haploid genome and are located in the segment of chromosome 2 that corresponds to polytene bands 39D2-3 to E1-2. The influence of altered histone gene multiplicity on chromatin structure has been assayed by measuring modification of the gene inactivation associated with position effect variegation in genotypes bearing deletions of the 39D-E segment. The proportion of cells in which a variegating gene is active is increased in genotypes that are heterozygous for a deficiency that removes the histone gene complex. Deletions that remove segments adjacent to the histone gene complex have no effect on the expression of variegating genes. Suppression of position effect variegation associated with reduction of histone gene multiplicity applies to both X-linked and autosomal variegating genes. Position effects exerted by both autosomal and sex-chromosome heterochromatin were suppressible by deletions of the histone gene complex. The suppression was independent of the presence of the Y chromosome. A deficiency that deletes only the distal portion of the histone gene complex also has the ability to suppress position effect variegation. Duplication of the histone gene complex did not enhance position effect variegation. Deletion or duplication of the histone gene complex in the maternal genome had no effect on the extent of variegation in progeny whose histone gene multiplicity was normal. These results are discussed with respect to current knowledge of the organization of the histone gene complex and control of its expression.     

Genetically directed preferential X-activation seen in mice

The nature of the O^hv mutation of the X chromosome of the mouse is defined. This locus exerts a cis position effect upon the expression of genes Tfm and Blo mapping in the same region; genes on the same chromosome as the O^hv mutation are preferentially activated and genes on the other X chromosome are usually inactive. Following the proportion of Tfm cells in the kidneys of heterozygotes confirms that the variegation seen of the locus Blo in the coat is matched in inner tissues. By introducing the sex reversal gene Sxr into these stocks, a situation can be created in which wildtype kidney cells have a selective advantage over Tfm cells in the embryonic Wolfflan duct and urogenital sinus. In spite of this difference in cell advantages, Blo coat variegation and Tfm Wolffian duct cell preponderance continue to exhibit a good correlation. This excludes the possibility that the variegation depends upon a selective advantage of cells carrying Tfm alleles after random X-inactivation and therefore reinforces the conclusion that the O^hv mutation is directly concerned in the X-activation process. A model is presented in which this locus acts as a receptor site recognized by molecules which activate one X chromosome.     

Position Effects and Variegation Enhancers in an Autosomal Region of DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER

A dominant eye color mutation was found associated with a third chromosome inversion broken distally at or near the karmoisin (kar) locus in 87C and proximally within centric heterochromatin. Suppressibility of the mutant phenotype by an extra Y chromosome indicated that this was an example of dominant position-effect variegation. When heterozygous with deficiencies uncovering the kar locus, this inversion chromosome was found to be lethal unless a region in 87EF was also deleted. Extra Y chromosomes rescued inversion/deletion heterozygotes, while removal of the Y chromosome from heterozygous males deficient for the region in 87EF was lethal. Thus, a variegating lethal lies near the breakpoint in 87C, and a wild-type gene that enhances its variegation lies in 87EF. Furthermore, deletion of the region in 87EF was found to strongly suppress white-mottled-4 (w^m4) variegation, while deletion of another region in 87BC suppressed less strongly. These results indicate that essential genes on autosomes are sensitive to position effects, and loci that enhance variegation, as defined by deficiency mapping, are very common.     

Modifier Genes of the Sex Ratio Trait in Drosophila pseudoobscura

The msr trait of Drosophila pseudoobscura occurs when "sex-ratio" males produce a very high frequency of null-X sperm which give rise to sterile male (X/O) progeny. The trait involves dramatically lowered fecundity due to spermiogenic failure. The msr trait is multigenic and the genes are located on autosomes II, III and IV of the L116 laboratory stock. This stock also carries genes on the Y chromosome that lower the level of msr. When the genes on the L116 autosomes are present together or with those on the Y chromosome of other stocks, they interact cooperatively to produce very high levels of msr. The msr genes require the presence of a sex-ratio X chromosome to have any effect and thus may be regarded as modifiers of the "sex-ratio" phenotype. Crosses show that the genes causing msr are primarily recessive but have some expression when heterozygous. Sex chromosome nondisjunction is proposed as the mechanism underlying the msr trait.     

X-Y Exchange and the Coevolution of the X and Y Rdna Arrays in Drosophila melanogaster

The nucleolus organizers on the X and Y chromosomes of Drosophila melanogaster are the sites of 200-250 tandemly repeated genes for ribosomal RNA. As there is no meiotic crossing over in male Drosophila, the X and Y chromosomal rDNA arrays should be evolutionarily independent, and therefore divergent. The rRNAs produced by X and Y are, however, very similar, if not identical. Molecular, genetic and cytological analyses of a series of X chromosome rDNA deletions (bb alleles) showed that they arose by unequal exchange through the nucleolus organizers of the X and Y chromosomes. Three separate exchange events generated compound X·Y ^L chromosomes carrying mainly Y-specific rDNA. This led to the hypothesis that X-Y exchange is responsible for the coevolution of X and Y chromosomal rDNA. We have tested and confirmed several of the predictions of this hypothesis: First, X· Y^L chromosomes must be found in wild populations. We have found such a chromosome. Second, the X·Y^L chromosome must lose the Y^L arm, and/or be at a selective disadvantage to normal X⁺ chromosomes, to retain the normal morphology of the X chromosome. Six of seventeen sublines founded from homozygous X·Y^Lbb stocks have become fixed for chromosomes with spontaneous loss of part or all of the appended Y^L. Third, rDNA variants on the X chromosome are expected to be clustered within the X⁺ nucleolus organizer, recently donated (" Y") forms being proximal, and X-specific forms distal. We present evidence for clustering of rRNA genes containing Type 1 insertions. Consequently, X-Y exchange is probably responsible for the coevolution of X and Y rDNA arrays.     

Minichromosomes inDrosophila melanogaster derived from the transposing elementTE1

A minichromosome has originated from the transposing elementTE1. This autonomously replicating chromosome contains the structural genes white and roughest, from theDrosophila X chromosome. It arose within a stock carryingTE1 at 45F on chromosome2. In addition to thew andrst genes, the minichromosome may carry section 45C–45F from chromosome2. It is inherited by 33%–47% of the offspring. By this criterion it carries a centromere, although the origin of the centromere is unknown. From this minichromosome a still smaller one has originated, probably through the loss of all material from chromosome2 together with some heterochromatin. At the same time a duplication of white and roughest could have taken place. This chromosome has a strange morphology and is more frequently lost in meiosis than the larger one, but is still transmitted to about 29%–37% of the progeny of one parent heterozygous for the minichromosome. In both cases the flies have variegated eyes, probably as a result of position-effect variegation. The variegation pattern is influenced by factors in theX chromosome. The size of the smaller minichromosome is little more than 1 Mb as determined by pulsed field gel electrophoresis.     

Preferential Breakpoints in the Recovery of Broken Dicentric Chromosomes in Drosophila melanogaster

We designed a system to determine whether dicentric chromosomes in Drosophila melanogaster break at random or at preferred sites. Sister chromatid exchange in a Ring-X chromosome produced dicentric chromosomes with two bridging arms connecting segregating centromeres as cells divide. This double bridge can break in mitosis. A genetic screen recovered chromosomes that were linearized by breakage in the male germline. Because the screen required viability of males with this X chromosome, the breakpoints in each arm of the double bridge must be closely matched to produce a nearly euploid chromosome. We expected that most linear chromosomes would be broken in heterochromatin because there are no vital genes in heterochromatin, and breakpoint distribution would be relatively unconstrained. Surprisingly, approximately half the breakpoints are found in euchromatin, and the breakpoints are clustered in just a few regions of the chromosome that closely match regions identified as intercalary heterochromatin. The results support the Laird hypothesis that intercalary heterochromatin can explain fragile sites in mitotic chromosomes, including fragile X. Opened rings also were recovered after male larvae were exposed to X-rays. This method was much less efficient and produced chromosomes with a strikingly different array of breakpoints, with almost all located in heterochromatin. A series of circularly permuted linear X chromosomes was generated that may be useful for investigating aspects of chromosome behavior, such as crossover distribution and interference in meiosis, or questions of nuclear organization and function.     

Male-Sterilizing Interactions between Duplications and Deficiencies for Proximal X-Chromosome Material in DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER

The genetic limits of sixty-four deficiencies in the vicinity of the euchromatic-heterochromatic junction of the X chromosome were mapped with respect to a number of proximal recessive lethal mutations. They were also tested for male fertility in combination with three Y chromosomes carrying different amounts of proximal X-chromosome-derived material (B^SYy⁺, y⁺Ymal¹²⁶ and y⁺Ymal⁺). All deficiencies that did not include the locus of bb and a few that did were male-fertile in all male-viable Df(1)/Dp(1;Y) combinations. Nineteen bb deficiencies fell into six different classes by virtue of their male-fertility phenotypes when combined with the duplicated Y chromosomes. The six categories of deficiencies are consistent with a formalism that invokes three factors or regions at the base of the X, one distal and two proximal to bb, which bind a substance critical for precocious inactivation of the X chromosome in the primary spermatocyte. Free duplications carrying these regions or factors compete for the substance in such a way that, in the presence of such duplications, proximally deficient X chromosomes are unable to command sufficient substance for proper control of X-chromosome gene activity preparatory to spermatogenesis. We conclude that there is no single factor at the base of the X that is required for the fertility of males whose genotype is otherwise normal.     

Pleiotropic effects associated with the deletion of heterochromatin surrounding rDNA on the X chromosome of Drosophila

In Drosophila melanogaster X chromosome heterochromatin (Xh) constitutes the proximal 40% of the X chromosome DNA and contains a number of genetic elements with homologous sites on the Y chromosome, one of which is well defined, namely, the bobbed locus, the repetitive structural locus for the 18S and 28S rRNAs. This report presents the localisation of specific repeated DNA sequences within Xh and the employment of this sequence map in constructing new chromosomes to analyse the nature of the heterochromatin surrounding the rDNA region. Repeated sequences were located relative to inversion breakpoints which differentiate Xh cytogenetically. When the rDNA region was manipulated to be in a position in the chromosome so that it was without the Xh which normally surrounds it, the following obser-vations were made, (i) The rDNA region of Xh is intrinsically hetero-chromatic, remaining genetically active and yet possessing major heterochromatic properties even in the absence of the flanking heterochromatin regions, (ii) The size of the deletion removing the portion of Xh normally located distal to the rDNA region affected the dominance relationship between the X and Y nucleolar organizers (activity/endoreduplication assayed in male salivary glands). The X rDNA without any flanking heterochromatin was dominant over Y rDNA while the presence of some Xh allowed both the X and Y rDNA to be utilized, (iii) Enhancement of the position effect variegation on the white locus was demonstrated to occur as a result of the Xh deletions generated. EMS mutagenesis studies argue that the regions of Xh flanking the rDNA region contain no vital loci despite the fact that they strongly effect gene expression in some genotypes. This is consistent with early studies using X-ray mutagenesis (Lindsley et al., 1960). The pleiotropic effects of deleting specific regions of Xh is discussed in relation to the possible influence of heterochromatin on the organisation of the functional interphase nucleus.     

Perturbation Analysis of Heterochromatin-Mediated Gene Silencing and Somatic Inheritance

Repetitive sequences in eukaryotic genomes induce chromatin-mediated gene-silencing of juxtaposed genes. Many components that promote or antagonize silencing have been identified, but how heterochromatin causes variegated and heritable changes in gene expression remains mysterious. We have used inducible mis-expression in the Drosophila eye to recover new factors that alter silencing caused by the bw^D allele, an insertion of repetitive satellite DNA that silences a bw⁺ allele on the homologous chromosome. Inducible modifiers allow perturbation of silencing at different times in development, and distinguish factors that affect establishment or maintenance of silencing. We find that diverse chromatin and RNA processing factors can de-repress silencing. Most factors are effective even in differentiated cells, implying that silent chromatin remains plastic. However, over-expression of the bantam microRNA or the crooked-legs (crol) zinc-finger protein only de-repress silencing when expressed in cycling cells. Over-expression of crol accelerates the cell cycle, and this is required for de-repression of silencing. Strikingly, continual over-expression of crol converts the speckled variegation pattern of bw^D into sectored variegation, where de-repression is stably inherited through mitotic divisions. Over-expression of crol establishes an open chromatin state, but the factor is not needed to maintain this state. Our analysis reveals that active chromatin states can be efficiently inherited through cell divisions, with implications for the stable maintenance of gene expression patterns through development.     

Chromosomal segregational mechanisms in ant-lions (Myrmeleontidae,Neuroptera)

In a single male specimen of Myrmeleon mexicanum Banks the sex chromosomes, normally X and Y, were replaced by what appeared to be X¹X² and Y. These segregated as expected on that interpretation in only half of the spermatocytes — in the other half, one X and the Y segregated from the other X. This atypical segregation is explicable on the assumption that one of the supposed Xs is a supernumerary, not a sex chromosome, and the diploid complement of the male comprises six pairs of autosomes plus a supernumerary and the X and Y sex chromosomes. The orientation of the X chromosomes at first metaphase was variable: kinetochoric activity may be localized midway the length of the chromosome, as in gonial mitosis, or terminally. Comparative study of three congeneric species, seven of Brachynemurus, one of Psammoleon, and one of Vella showed normal segregation in all, and no evidence for secondary kinetochoric activity. In nine of the species studied one pair of autosomes was unconjoined at first metaphase in 0.3%–1.2% of primary spermatocytes. These autosomes segregated precociously with the sex chromosomes in the central unit of the spindle. In one exceptional male of Brachynemurus hubbardi Currie all first meiotic metaphases showed this behavior, and a compound X¹X²/Y¹Y² system was thus simulated. Bivalent formation replaced distance segregation of sex chromosomes in 0.4%–3.2% of the spermatocytes in seven of the thirteen species studied. These sex-bivalents frequently displayed partial or complete failure in congression.     

Fine-Structure Analysis and Genetic Organization at the Base of the X Chromosome in DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER

Genetic organization at the base of the X chromosome was studied through the analysis of X-ray-induced deficiencies. Deficiencies were recovered so as to have a preselected right end "anchored" in the centric heterochromatin to the right of the su(f) locus. "Free" ends of deficiencies occurred at any of 22 intervals in Section 20 and in the proximal portion of Section 19 of Bridges' (1938) polytene chromosome map. The distribution of 130 such free ends of deficiencies induced in normal, In(1)sc ⁸, and In(1)w^m4 chromosomes suggests that on the single section level, genes are flanked by "hot" or "cold" sites for X-ray-induced breaks, and that occurrence of the hot spots is dependent on their interaction with the fixed-end sites in the centric heterochromatin. In the light of these results, it is argued that long heterochromatic sequences separate the relatively few genes in Section 20, and thus endow it with several characteristics typical of heterochromatic regions. Section 20 is considered to be a transition region between the mostly heterochromatic and mostly euchromatic regions of the X chromosome; the differences between them are suggested as being merely quantitative.     

Dynamic organization of the β-heterochromatin in the Drosophila melanogaster polytene X chromosome

Region 20 of the polytene X chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster was studied in salivary glands (SG) and pseudonurse cells (PNC) of otu mutants. In SG chromosomes the morphology of the region strongly depends on two modifiers of position effect variegation: temperature and amount of heterochromatin. It is banded in XYY males at 25°?C and β-heterochromatic in X0 males at 14°?C, i.e. it shows dynamic transitions. In PNC chromosomes region 20 is not heterochromatic, but demonstrates a clear banding pattern. Some molecular markers of mitotic heterochromatin were localized by means of in situ hybridization on PNC chromosomes: DNA of the gene su(f) in section 20C, the nucleolar organizer and 359-bp satellite in 20F. The 359-bp satellite, which has been considered to be specific for heterochromatin of the mitotic X chromosome, was found at two additional sites on chromosome 3L, proximally to 80C. The right arm of the X chromosome in SG chromosomes was localized in the inversion In(1LR)pn2b: the telomeric HeT-A DNA and AAGAG satellite from the right arm are polytenized, having been relocated from heterochromatin to euchromatin.     

X-4 Translocations and Meiotic Drive in Drosophila melanogaster Males: Role of Sex Chromosome Pairing

Males carrying certain X-4 translocations exhibit strongly skewed sperm recovery ratios. The X^P4^D half of the translocation disjoins regularly from the Y chromosome and the 4^PX^D half disjoins regularly from the normal 4. Yet the smaller member of each bivalent is recovered in excess of its pairing partner, apparently due to differential gametic lethality. Chromosome recovery probabilities are multiplicative; the viability of each genotype is the product of the recovery probability of its component chromosomes. Meiotic drive can also be caused by deficiency for X heterochromatin. In(1)sc^4Lsc^8R males show the same size dependent chromosome recoveries and multiplicative recovery probabilities found in T(1;4)B^S males. Meiotic drive in In(1)sc^4Lsc^8R males has been shown to be due to X-Y pairing failure. Although pairing is regular in the T(X;4) males, the striking phenotypic parallels suggest a common explanation. The experiments described below show that the two phenomena are, in fact, one and the same. X-4 translocations are shown to have the same effect on recovery of independently assorting chromosomes as does In(1)sc^4Lsc^8R. Addition of pairing sites to the 4^PX^D half of the translocation eliminates drive. A common explanation—failure of the distal euchromatic portion of the X chromosome to participate in X:Y meiotic pairing—is suggested as the cause for drive. The effect of X chromosome breakpoint on X-4 translocation induced meiotic drive is investigated. It is found that translocations with breakpoints distal to 13C on the salivary map do not cause drive while translocations broken proximal to 13C cause drive. The level of drive is related to the position of the breakpoint—the more proximal the breakpoint the greater the drive.     

Cytogenetic Analysis of a Segment of the Y Chromosome of DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER

Males carrying a large deficiency in the long arm of the Y chromosome known to delete the fertility gene kl-2 are sterile and exhibit a complex phenotype: (1) First metaphase chromosomes are irregular in outline and appear sticky; (2) spermatids contain micronuclei; (3) the nebenkerns of the spermatids are nonuniform in size; (4) a high molecular weight protein ordinarily present in sperm is absent; and (5) crystals appear in the nucleus and cytoplasm of spermatocytes and spermatids. In such males that carry Ste⁺ on their X chromosome the crystals appear long and needle shaped; in Ste males the needles are much shorter and assemble into star-shaped aggregates. The large deficiency may be subdivided into two shorter component deficiencies. The more distal is male sterile and lacks the high molecular weight polypeptide; the more proximal is responsible for the remainder of the phenotype. Ste males carrying the more proximal component deficiency are sterile, but Ste ⁺ males are fertile. Genetic studies of chromosome segregation in such males reveal that (1) both the sex chromosomes and the large autosomes undergo nondisjunction, (2) the fourth chromosomes disjoin regularly, (3) sex chromosome nondisjunction is more frequent in cells in which the second or third chromosomes nondisjoin than in cells in which autosomal disjunction is regular, (4) in doubly exceptional cells, the sex chromosomes tend to segregate to the opposite pole from the autosomes and (5) there is meiotic drive; i.e., reciprocal meiotic products are not recovered with equal frequencies, complements with fewer chromosomes being recovered more frequently than those with more chromosomes. The proximal component deficiency can itself be further subdivided into two smaller component deficiencies, both of which have nearly normal spermatogenic phenotypes as observed in the light microscope. Meiosis in Ste ⁺ males carrying either of these small Y deficiencies is normal; Ste males, however, exhibit low levels of sex chromosome nondisjunction with either deficient Y. The meiotic phenotype is apparently sensitive to the amount of Y chromosome missing and to the Ste constitution of the X chromosome.     

Cytological identification of two X-chromosome types in the wood lemming (Myopus schisticolor)

In the wood lemming (Myopus schisticolor) three genetic types of sex chromosome constitution in females are postulated: XX, X^*X and X^*Y (X^*=X with a mutation inactivating the male determining effect of the Y chromosome). Males are all XY. It is shown in the present paper that the two types of X chromosomes, X and X^*, exhibit differences in the G-band patterns of their short arms. In addition, it was demonstrated in unbanded chromosomes that the short arm in X^* is shorter than in X. The origin of these differences is still obscure; but they allow to identify and to distinguish the individual types of sex chromosome constitution, as of XX versus X^*X females and of X^*Y females versus XY males, on the basis of G-banded chromosome preparations from somatic cells.