Interaction of neurochondrin with the melanin-concentrating hormone receptor 1 interferes with G protein-coupled signal transduction but not agonist-mediated internalization

Screening of a human brain cDNA library using the C-terminal tail of the melanin-concentrating hormone receptor 1 (MCHR1) as bait in a yeast two-hybrid assay resulted in the identification of the neurite-outgrowth related factor, neurochondrin. This interaction was verified in overlay, pulldown, and co-immunoprecipitation assays. Deletion mapping confined the binding to the C terminus of neurochondrin and to the proximal C terminus of MCHR1, a region known to be involved in G protein binding and signal transduction. This region of the MCHR1 is also able to interact with the actin- and intermediate filament-binding protein, periplakin. Interactions of MCHR1 with neurochondrin and periplakin were competitive, indicating that these two proteins bind to overlapping regions of MCHR1. Although neurochondrin did not interfere with melanin-concentrating hormone-mediated internalization of the receptor, it did inhibit G protein-coupled signal transduction via both Galpha(i/o) and Galpha(q/11) family G proteins as measured by each of melanin-concentrating hormone-induced G protein-activated inwardly rectifying K(+) channel activity of voltage-clamped amphibian oocytes, by calcium mobilization in transfected mammalian cells, and by reduction in the capacity of melanin-concentrating hormone to promote binding of [(35)S]guanosine 5'-3-O-(thio)triphosphate to both Galpha(o1) and Galpha(11). Immunohistochemistry revealed co-expression of neurochondrin and MCHR1 within the rodent brain, suggesting that neurochondrin may be involved in the regulation of MCHR1 signaling and play a role in modulating melanin-concentrating hormone-mediated functions in vivo.     

Selective interactions between helix VIII of the human mu-opioid receptors and the C terminus of periplakin disrupt G protein activation

Analysis of interactions between the C-terminal tail of the MOP-1 and MOP-1A variants of the human mu-opioid receptor with proteins derived from a human brain cDNA library resulted in identification of the actin and intermediate filament-binding protein periplakin. Mapping of this interaction indicated that the predicted fourth intracellular loop/helix VIII of the receptor interacts with the C-terminal rod and linker region of periplakin. Periplakin is widely expressed in the central nervous system of both man and rat and demonstrated an overlapping but not identical distribution with mu-opioid (MOP) receptors. Co-expression of periplakin with MOP-1 or a MOP-1-eYFP fusion construct in HEK293 cells did not interfere with agonist-mediated internalization of the receptor. When co-expressed with a MOP-1-Gi1 alpha fusion protein periplakin significantly reduced the capacity of the agonist to stimulate binding of 35S-labeled guanosine 5'-3-O-(thio)triphosphate ([35S]GTP gamma S) to the receptor-associated G protein. By contrast, periplakin did not interfere with agonist-stimulation of [35S]GTP gamma S binding to either an alpha 2A-adrenoreceptor-Gi1 alpha fusion protein or a beta2-adrenoreceptor-Gs alpha fusion protein, indicating its selectivity of function. This represents the first example of an opioid receptor-interacting protein that functions to disrupt agonist-mediated G protein activation.     

Functional interactions between the alpha1b-adrenoceptor and Galpha11 are compromised by de-palmitoylation of the G protein but not of the receptor

Both the alpha1b-adrenoceptor and Galpha11 are targets for post-translational thio-acylation that is regulated by agonist occupancy of the receptor [P.A. Stevens, J. Pediani, J.J. Carrillo, G. Milligan, J. Biol. Chem. 276 (2001) 35883]. In co-expression studies mutation of the sites of thio-acylation in the G protein or treatment of cell membranes with hydroxylamine greatly reduced agonist stimulation of guanosine 5'-[gamma-[35S]thio]triphosphate ([35S]GTPgammaS) binding. In alpha1b-adrenoceptor-Galpha11 fusion proteins mutation of thio-acylation sites in receptor or G protein did not alter the binding affinity of the antagonist [3H]prazosin or the agonist phenylephrine. Although the potency of phenylephrine to stimulate binding of [35S]GTPgammaS to alpha1b-adrenoceptor-Galpha11 fusion proteins was unaffected by the thio-acylation potential of either element, the maximal effect was reduced by some 50% when the G protein but not the receptor was mutated to prevent thio-acylation. This reflected lack of thio-acylation of the G protein rather than mutation of Cys9 and Cys10 to Ser because treatment with hydroxylamine mimicked this in fusions containing the wild type G protein but was without effect in those mutated to prevent thio-acylation. Mutation to reduce binding of beta/gamma to Galpha11 markedly reduced phenylephrine stimulation of [35S]GTPgammaS binding. Combination of mutations to prevent thio-acylation and beta/gamma binding did not, however, have an additive effect on [35S]GTPgammaS binding. These results indicate that the thio-acylation status of the alpha1b-adrenoceptor does not regulate G protein activation whereas thio-acylation of Galpha11 plays a key role in activation by the receptor beyond providing membrane association and proximity.     

Effective information transfer from the alpha 1b-adrenoceptor to Galpha 11 requires both beta/gamma interactions and an aromatic group four amino acids from the C terminus of the G protein

Co-expression of the alpha(1b)-adrenoreceptor and Galpha(11) in cells derived from a Galpha(q)/Galpha(11) knock-out mouse allows agonist-mediated elevation of intracellular Ca(2+) levels that is transduced by beta/gamma released from the G protein alpha subunit. Mutation of Tyr(356) of Galpha(11) to Phe, within a receptor contact domain, had little effect on function but this was reduced greatly by alteration to Ser and virtually eliminated by conversion to Asp. This pattern was replicated following incorporation of each form of Galpha(11) into fusion proteins with the alpha(1b)-adrenoreceptor. Following a [(35)S]guanosine 5'-O-(3-thiotriphosphate) (GTPgammaS) binding assay, immunoprecipitation of the wild type alpha(1b)-adrenoreceptor-Galpha(11) fusion protein indicated that the agonist phenylephrine stimulated guanine nucleotide exchange on Galpha(11) more than 30-fold. Information transfer by agonist was controlled in residue 356 Galpha(11) mutants with rank order Tyr > Phe > Trp > Ile > Ala = Gln = Arg > Ser > Asp, although these alterations did not alter the binding affinity of either phenylephrine or an antagonist ligand. Mutation of a beta/gamma contact interface in the alpha(1b)-adrenoreceptor-Tyr(356) Galpha(11) fusion protein did not alter ligand binding affinity but did reduce greatly beta/gamma binding and phenylephrine stimulation of [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding. It also prevented agonist elevation of intracellular Ca(2+) levels, as did a mutation in Galpha(11) that prevents G protein subunit dissociation. These results indicate that a bulky aromatic group is required four amino acids from the C terminus of Galpha(11) to maximize information transfer from an agonist-occupied receptor and disprove the hypothesis that tyrosine phosphorylation of this residue is required for G protein activation (Umemori, H., Inoue, T., Kume, S., Sekiyama, N., Nagao, M., Itoh, H., Nakanishi, S., Mikoshiba, K., and Yamamoto, T. (1997) Science 276, 1878-1881). This is distinct from Galpha(i1), where hydrophobicity of the amino acid is the key determinant at this location. They also further demonstrate a key role for the beta/gamma complex in enhancing receptor to G protein alpha subunit information transfer.     

Coordinated agonist regulation of receptor and G protein palmitoylation and functional rescue of palmitoylation-deficient mutants of the G protein G11alpha following fusion to the alpha1b-adrenoreceptor: palmitoylation of G11alpha is not required for interaction with beta*gamma complex.

Transfection of either the alpha(1b)-adrenoreceptor or Galpha(11) into a fibroblast cell line derived from a Galpha(q)/Galpha(11) double knockout mouse failed to produce elevation of intracellular [Ca(2+)] upon the addition of agonist. Co-expression of these two polypeptides, however, produced a significant stimulation. Co-transfection of the alpha(1b)-adrenoreceptor with the palmitoylation-resistant C9S,C10S Galpha(11) also failed to produce a signal, and much reduced and kinetically delayed signals were obtained using either C9S Galpha(11) or C10S Galpha(11). Expression of a fusion protein between the alpha(1b)-adrenoreceptor and Galpha(11) allowed [Ca(2+)](i) elevation, and this was also true for a fusion protein between the alpha(1b)-adrenoreceptor and C9S,C10S Galpha(11), since this strategy ensures proximity of the two polypeptides at the cell membrane. For both fusion proteins, co-expression of transducin alpha, as a beta.gamma-sequestering agent, fully attenuated the Ca(2+) signal. Both of these fusion proteins and one in which an acylation-resistant form of the receptor was linked to wild type Galpha(11) were also targets for agonist-regulated [(3)H]palmitoylation and bound [(35)S]guanosine 5'-3-O-(thio)triphosphate (GTPgammaS) in an agonist concentration-dependent manner. The potency of agonist to stimulate [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding was unaffected by the palmitoylation potential of either receptor or G protein. These studies provide clear evidence for coordinated, agonist-mediated regulation of the post-translational acylation of both a receptor and partner G protein and demonstrate the capacity of such fusions to bind and then release beta.gamma complex upon agonist stimulation whether or not the G protein can be palmitoylated. They also demonstrate that Ca(2+) signaling in EF88 cells by such fusion proteins is mediated via release of the G protein beta.gamma complex.     

Stimulated D(1) dopamine receptors couple to multiple Galpha proteins in different brain regions

Previous studies have revealed that activation of rat striatal D(1) dopamine receptors stimulates both adenylyl cyclase and phospholipase C via G(s) and G(q), respectively. The differential distribution of these systems in brain supports the existence of distinct receptor systems. The present communication extends the study by examining other brain regions: hippocampus, amygdala, and frontal cortex. In membrane preparations of these brain regions, selective stimulation of D(1) dopamine receptors increases the hydrolysis of phosphatidylinositol/phosphatidylinositol 4,5-biphosphate. In these brain regions, D(1) dopamine receptors couple differentially to multiple Galpha protein subunits. Antisera against Galpha(q) blocks dopamine-stimulated PIP(2) hydrolysis in hippocampal and in striatal membranes. The binding of [(35)S]GTPgammaS or [alpha-(32)P]GTP to Galpha(i) was enhanced in all brain regions. Dopamine also increased the binding of [(35)S]GTPgammaS or [alpha-(32)P]GTP to Galpha(q) in these brain regions: hippocampus = amygdala > frontal cortex. However, dopamine-stimulated binding of [(35)S]GTPgammaS to Galphas only in the frontal cortex and striatum. This differential coupling profile in the brain regions was not related to a differential regional distribution of the Galpha proteins. Dopamine induced increases in GTPgammaS binding to Galpha(s) and Galpha(q) was blocked by the D(1) antagonist SCH23390 but not by D(2) receptor antagonist l-sulpiride, suggesting that D(1) dopamine receptors couple to both Galpha(s) and Galpha(q) proteins. Co-immunoprecipitation of Galpha proteins with receptor-binding sites indicate that in the frontal cortex, D(1) dopamine-binding sites are associated with both Galpha(s) and Galpha(q) and, in hippocampus or amygdala, D(1) dopamine receptors couple solely to Galpha(q). The results indicate that in addition to the D(1)/G(s)/adenylyl cyclase system, brain D(1)-like dopamine receptor sites activate phospholipase C through Galpha(q) protein.     

The [35S]GTPgammaS binding assay: approaches and applications in pharmacology

Receptors of the of seven transmembrane spanning, heterotrimeric G protein coupled family (GPCR) play crucial roles in regulating physiological functions and consequently are targets for the action of many classes of drugs. Activation of receptor by agonist leads to the dissociation of GDP from Galpha of the Galphabetagamma heterotrimer, followed by the binding of GTP to Galpha and subsequent modulation of downstream effectors. The G protein heterotrimer is reformed by GTPase activity of the Galpha subunit, forming Galpha-GDP and so allowing Galpha and Gbetagamma to recombine. The [35S]GTPgammaS assay measures the level of G protein activation following agonist occupation of a GPCR, by determining the binding of the non-hydrolyzable analog [35S]GTPgammaS to Galpha subunits. Thus, the assay measures a functional consequence of receptor occupancy at one of the earliest receptor-mediated events. The assay allows for traditional pharmacological parameters of potency, efficacy and antagonist affinity, with the advantage that agonist measures are not subjected to amplification or other modulation that may occur when analyzing parameters further downstream of the receptor. In general the assay is experimentally more feasible for receptors coupled to the abundant G(i/o) proteins. Nevertheless, [35S]GTPgammaS binding assays are used with GPCRs that couple to the G(s) and G(q) families of G proteins, especially in artificial expression systems, or using receptor-Galpha constructs or immunoprecipitation of [35S]GTPgammaS-labeled Galpha. The relative simplicity of the assay has made it very popular and its use is providing insights into contemporary pharmacological topics including the roles of accessory proteins in signaling, constitutive activity of receptors and agonist specific signaling.     

Dimers of class A G protein-coupled receptors function via agonist-mediated trans-activation of associated G proteins

The histamine H1 receptor and the alpha1b-adrenoreceptor are G protein-coupled receptors that elevate intracellular [Ca2+] via activation of Gq/G11. Assessed by co-immunoprecipitation and time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer they both exist as homo-dimers. The addition of the G protein G11alpha to the C terminus of these receptors did not prevent dimerization. Agonists produced a large stimulation of guanosine 5'-3-O-([35S]thio)triphosphate ([35S]GTPgammaS) binding to receptor-G protein fusions containing wild type forms of both polypeptides. For both receptors this was abolished by incorporation of G208AG11alpha into the fusions. Mutation of a highly conserved leucine in intracellular loop 2 of each receptor also eliminated agonist function but not binding. Co-expression of the two non-functional but complementary fusion constructs reconstituted agonist-mediated binding of [35S]GTPgammaS in membranes of HEK293 cells and elevation of [Ca2+]i in mouse embryo fibroblasts lacking both Gq and G11. Co-expression of the histamine H1 receptor- and the alpha1b-adrenoreceptor-G11alpha fusions allowed detection of functional hetero-dimeric complexes, whereas co-expression of histamine H1 receptor-G11alpha with increasing amounts of L151Dalpha1b-adrenoreceptor resulted in decreasing levels of histamine-stimulated [35S]GTPgammaS binding. Co-expression of the alpha1b-adrenoreceptor with a fusion protein incorporating the N-terminal domain and transmembrane helix 1 of the alpha1b-adrenoreceptor and G11alpha did not result in agonist activation of the G protein but did indicate a role for transmembrane helix 1 in dimerization. These data demonstrate that dimers of these class A receptors function via trans-activation of associated G proteins.     

Comparative analysis of the efficacy of A1 adenosine receptor activation of Gi/o alpha G proteins following coexpression of receptor and G protein and expression of A1 adenosine receptor-Gi/o alpha fusion proteins

HEK293T cells were transiently transfected to express either the human A1 adenosine receptor together with pertussis toxin-resistant cysteine-to-glycine forms of the alpha subunits of Gi1 (C351G), Gi2 (C352G), and Gi3 (C351G) and wild-type Go1alpha or fusion proteins comprising the A1 adenosine receptor and these Gi/o G proteins to compare A1 adenosine receptor agonist-mediated activation of these Gi family G proteins upon coexpression of individual Gi/o G proteins and receptor versus expression as receptor-G protein fusion proteins. Addition of the adenosine receptor agonist 5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (NECA) to membranes of pertussis toxin-treated cells resulted in a concentration-dependent stimulation of [35S]GTPgammaS binding with comparable amounts of NECA required to produce half-maximal stimulation following transfection of A1 adenosine receptor and Gi/o G proteins either as fusion proteins or as separate polypeptides. However, the magnitude of agonist-mediated activation of GTPgammaS binding was greatly enhanced by expressing the A1 adenosine receptor and Gi family G proteins from chimaeric open reading frames. This observation was consistent following the study of more than 40 agonists. No preferential activation of any G protein was observed with more than 40 A1 receptor agonists following cotransfection of receptor with G protein or transfection of receptor-G protein fusion proteins. These studies demonstrate the utility of using fusion proteins to study receptor-G protein interaction, show that the A1 adenosine receptor couples equally well to the Gi/o G proteins Gi1alpha, G i2alpha, Gi3alpha, and Go1alpha, and demonstrate that for a range of agonists there is no selectivity for activation of any particular A1 adenosine receptor-Gi/o G protein combination.     

Pertussis toxin-insensitive activation of the heterotrimeric G-proteins Gi/Go by the NG108-15 G-protein activator

A ligand-independent activator of heterotrimeric brain G-protein was partially purified from detergent-solubilized extracts of the neuroblastoma-glioma cell hybrid NG108-15. The G-protein activator (NG108-15 G-protein activator (NG-GPA)) increased [(35)S]guanosine 5'-O-(thiotriphosphate) ([(35)S]GTPgammaS) to purified brain G-protein in a magnesium-dependent manner and promoted GDP dissociation from Galpha(o). The NG-GPA also increased GTPgammaS binding to purified, recombinant Galpha(i2), Galpha(i3), and Galpha(o), but minimally altered nucleotide binding to purified transducin. The NG-GPA increased GTPgammaS binding to membrane-bound G-proteins and inhibited basal, forskolin- and hormone-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity in DDT(1)-MF-2 cell membranes. In contrast to G-protein coupled receptor-mediated activation of heterotrimeric G-proteins in DDT(1)-MF-2 cell membrane preparations, the action of the NG-GPA was not altered by treatment of the cells with pertussis toxin. ADP-ribosylation of purified brain G-protein also failed to alter the increase in GTPgammaS binding elicited by the NG-GPA. Thus, the NG-GPA acts in a manner distinct from that of a G-protein coupled receptor and other recently described receptor-independent activators of G-protein signaling. These data indicate the presence of unexpected regulatory domains on G(i)/G(o) proteins and suggest the existence of pertussis toxin-insensitive modes of signal input to G(i)/G(o) signaling systems.     

Coupling efficacy and selectivity of the human mu-opioid receptor expressed as receptor-Galpha fusion proteins in Escherichia coli

Two constructs encoding the human micro-opioid receptor (hMOR) fused at its C terminus to either one of two Galpha subunits, Galpha(o1) (hMOR-Galpha(o1)) and Galpha(i2) (hMOR-Galpha(i2)), were expressed in Escherichia coli at levels suitable for pharmacological studies (0.4-0.5 pmol/mg). Receptors fused to Galpha(o1) or to Galpha(i2) maintained high-affinity binding of the antagonist diprenorphine. Affinities of the micro-selective agonists morphine, [D-Ala(2),N-Me-Phe(4),Gly(5)-ol]enkephalin (DAMGO), and endomorphins as well as their potencies and intrinsic activities in stimulating guanosine 5'-O-(3-[(35)S]thiotriphosphate) ([(35)S]GTPgammaS) binding were assessed in the presence of added purified Gbetagamma subunits. Both fusion proteins displayed high-affinity agonist binding and agonist-stimulated [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding. In the presence of Gbetagamma dimers, the affinities of DAMGO and endomorphin-1 and -2 were higher at hMOR-Galpha(i2) than at hMOR-Galpha(o1), whereas morphine displayed similar affinities at the two chimeras. Potencies of the four agonists in stimulating [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding at hMOR-Galpha(o1) were similar, whereas at hMOR-Galpha(i2), endomorphin-1 and morphine were more potent than DAMGO and endomorphin-2. The intrinsic activities of the four agonists at the two fusion constructs were similar. The results confirm hMOR coupling to Galpha(o1) and Galpha(i2) and support the hypothesis of the existence of multiple receptor conformational states, depending on the nature of the G protein to which it is coupled.     

Receptor-mediated changes at the myristoylated amino terminus of Galpha(il) proteins

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) catalyze nucleotide release in heterotrimeric G proteins, the slow step in G protein activation. G i/o family proteins are permanently, cotranslationally myristoylated at the extreme amino terminus. While myristoylation of the amino terminus has long been known to aid in anchoring G i proteins to the membrane, the role of myristoylation with regard to interaction with activated receptors is not known. Previous studies have characterized activation-dependent changes in the amino terminus of Galpha proteins in solution [Medkova, M. (2002) Biochemistry 41, 9963-9972; Preininger, A. M. (2003) Biochemistry 42, 7931-7941], but changes in the environment of specific residues within the Galpha i1 amino terminus during receptor-mediated G i activation have not been reported. Using site-specific fluorescence labeling of individual residues along a stretch of the Galpha il amino terminus, we found specific changes in the environment of these residues upon interaction with the activated receptor and following GTPgammaS binding. These changes map to a distinct surface of the amino-terminal helix opposite the Gbetagamma binding interface. The receptor-dependent fluorescence changes are consistent with a myristoylated amino terminus in the proximity of the membrane and/or receptor. Myristoylation affects both the rate and intensity of receptor activation-dependent changes detected at several residues along the amino terminus (with no significant effect on the rate of receptor-mediated GTPgammaS binding). This work demonstrates that the myristoylated amino terminus of Galpha il proteins undergoes receptor-mediated changes during the dynamic process of G protein signaling.     

Regulation of the coupling to different G proteins of rat corticotropin-releasing factor receptor type 1 in human embryonic kidney 293 cells

The regulation of G protein activation by the rat corticotropin-releasing factor receptor type 1 (rCRFR1) in human embryonic kidney (HEK)293 (HEK-rCRFR1) cell membranes was studied. Corresponding to a high and low affinity ligand binding site, sauvagine and other peptidic CRFR1 ligands evoked high and low potency responses of G protein activation, differing by 64-fold in their EC(50) values as measured by stimulation of [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding. Contrary to the low potency response, the high potency response was of lower GTPgammaS affinity, pertussis toxin (PTX)-insensitive, and homologously desensitized. Distinct desensitization was also observed in the adenylate cyclase activity, when its high potency stimulation was abolished and the activity became low potently inhibited by sauvagine. From these results and immunoprecipitation of [(35)S]GTPgammaS-bound Galpha(s) and Galpha(i) subunits it is concluded that the high and low potency [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding stimulation reflected coupling to G(s) and G(i) proteins, respectively, only G(s) coupling being homologously desensitized. Immunoprecipitation of [(35)S]GTPgammaS-bound Galpha(q/11) revealed additional coupling to G(q/11), which also was homologously desensitized. Although Galpha(q/11) coupling was PTX-insensitive, half of the sauvagine-stimulated accumulation of inositol phosphates in the cells was PTX-sensitive, suggesting involvement of G(i) in addition to G(q/11)in the stimulation of inositol metabolism. It is concluded that CRFR1 signals through at least two different ways, one leading to G(s)- and G(q/11)-mediated signaling steps and desensitization and another leading to G(i) -mediated signals without being desensitized. Furthermore, the concentrations of the stimulating ligand and GTP and desensitization may be part of a regulatory mechanism determining the actual ratio of the coupling of CRFR1 to different G proteins.     

Dehydroepiandrosterone activates endothelial cell nitric-oxide synthase by a specific plasma membrane receptor coupled to Galpha(i2,3)

The adrenal steroid dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) has no known cellular receptor or unifying mechanism of action, despite evidence suggesting beneficial vascular effects in humans. Based on previous data from our laboratory, we hypothesized that DHEA binds to specific cell-surface receptors to activate intracellular G-proteins and endothelial nitric-oxide synthase (eNOS). We now pharmacologically characterize a putative plasma membrane DHEA receptor and define its associated G-proteins. The [3H]DHEA binding to isolated plasma membranes from bovine aortic endothelial cells was of high affinity (K(d) = 48.7 pm) and saturable (B(max) = 500 fmol/mg protein). Structurally related steroids failed to compete with DHEA for binding. The putative DHEA receptor was functionally coupled to G-proteins, because guanosine 5'-O-(3-thio)triphosphate (GTPgammaS) inhibited [3H]DHEA binding to plasma membranes by 69%, and DHEA increased [35S]GTPgammaS binding by 157%. DHEA stimulated [35S]GTPgammaS binding to Galpha(i2) and Galpha(i3), but not to Galpha(i1) or Galpha(o). Pretreatment of plasma membranes with antibody to Galpha(i2) or Galpha(i3), but not to Galpha(i1), inhibited the DHEA activation of eNOS. Thus, DHEA receptors are expressed on endothelial cell plasma membranes and are coupled to eNOS activity through Galpha(i2) and Galpha(i3). These novel findings should allow us to isolate the putative receptor and reevaluate the physiological role of DHEA activity.     

Copper and zinc inhibit Galphas function: a nucleotide-free state of Galphas induced by Cu2+ and Zn2+

The stimulatory GTP-binding protein of adenylyl cyclase (AC) regulates hormone-stimulated production of cAMP. Here, we demonstrate that Cu(2+) and Zn(2+) inhibit the steady-state GTPase activity of the alpha subunit of GTP-binding protein (Galpha(s)) but do not alter its intrinsic GTPase activity. Cu(2+) and Zn(2+) decrease steady-state GTPase activity by inhibiting the binding of GTP to Galpha(s). Moreover, Cu(2+) and Zn(2+) increase GDP dissociation from Galpha(s) and render the G protein in a nucleotide-free state. However, these cations do not alter the dissociation of the guanosine 5'-3-O-(thio)triphosphate (GTPgammaS) that is already bound to the Galpha(s). Because of their ability to inhibit GTPgammaS binding, preincubation of Cu(2+) or Zn(2+) with Galpha(s) does not permit GTPgammaS to activate Galpha(s) and stimulate AC activity. However, preincubation of Galpha(s) with GTPgammaS followed by addition of Cu(2+) or Zn(2+) did not alter the ability of Galpha(s) to stimulate AC activity. Interestingly, AlF(4)(-) partially restored the ability of Galpha(s), which had been preincubated with Cu(2+) or Zn(2+), to stimulate AC; AlF(4)(-) does not permit the re-association of unbound GDP with Galpha(s). Thus, the interaction of AlF(4)(-) with the nucleotide-free Galpha(s) is sufficient to activate AC. Using antibodies to the N and C termini of Galpha(s), we show that the Cu(2+) interaction site on the G protein is in the C terminus. We conclude that Cu(2+) and Zn(2+) generate a nucleotide-free state of Galpha(s) and that, in the absence of any nucleotide, the gamma-phosphate mimic of GTP, AlF(4)(-), alters Galpha(s) structure sufficiently to permit stimulation of AC activity. Moreover, our finding that isoproterenol-stimulated AC activity was more sensitive to inhibition by Cu(2+) and Zn(2+) as compared with forskolin-stimulated activity is consistent with Galpha(s) being a primary target of these cations in regulating the signaling from receptor to AC.     

Galphaq-coupled receptor internalization specifically induced by Galphaq signaling. Regulation by EBP50

In the present report, we investigated the effect of ezrin-radixin-moesin-binding phosphoprotein 50 (EBP50) expression on the agonist-induced internalization of the thromboxane A(2) beta receptor (TPbeta receptor). Interestingly, we found that EBP50 almost completely blocked TPbeta receptor internalization, which could not be reversed by overexpression of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) kinases and arrestins. Because we recently demonstrated that EBP50 can bind to and inhibit Galpha(q), we next studied whether Galpha(q) signaling could induce TPbeta receptor internalization, addressing the long standing question about the relationship between GPCR signaling and their internalization. Expression of a constitutively active Galpha(q) mutant (Galpha(q)-R183C) resulted in a robust internalization of the TPbeta receptor, which was unaffected by expression of dominant negative mutants of arrestin-2 and -3, but inhibited by expression of EBP50 or dynamin-K44A, a dominant negative mutant of dynamin. Phospholipase Cbeta and protein kinase C did not appear to significantly contribute to internalization of the TPbeta receptor, suggesting that Galpha(q) induces receptor internalization through a phospholipase Cbeta- and protein kinase C-independent pathway. Surprisingly, there appears to be specificity in Galpha protein-mediated GPCR internalization. Galpha(q)-R183C also induced the internalization of CXCR4 (Galpha(q)-coupled), whereas it failed to do so for the beta(2)-adrenergic receptor (Galpha(s)-coupled). Moreover, Galpha(s)-R201C, a constitutively active form of Galpha(s), had no effect on internalization of the TPbeta, CXCR4, and beta(2)-adrenergic receptors. Thus, we showed that Galpha protein signaling can lead to internalization of GPCRs, with specificity in both the Galpha proteins and GPCRs that are involved. Furthermore, a new function has been described for EBP50 in its capacity to inhibit receptor endocytosis.     

Up-regulation of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor by the MAS proto-oncogene is due to constitutive activation of Gq/G11 by MAS

Coexpression of the MAS proto-oncogene with the angiotensin II type 1 (AT(1)) receptor in CHO-K1 cells has been reported to increase the number of [(3)H]angiotensin II-binding sites, although MAS does not bind [(3)H]angiotensin II. In HEK293 cells stably expressing AT(1) receptor-cyan fluorescent protein (CFP), MAS-yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) expression from an inducible locus caused strong up-regulation of AT(1) receptor-CFP amounts and [(3)H]angiotensin II binding levels. The time course of AT(1) receptor-CFP up-regulation was also markedly slower than that of induction of MAS expression. These effects were not mimicked by induced expression of I138D MAS-YFP, a mutant unable to cause constitutive loading of [(35)S]guanosine 5'-O-(thiotriphosphate) onto the phospholipase Cbeta-linked G protein Galpha(11). Protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitors and the selective Galpha(q)/Galpha(11) inhibitor YM-254890 fully blocked MAS-induced up-regulation of AT(1) receptor-CFP amounts, whereas the PKC activator phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate produced strong up-regulation of AT(1) receptor-CFP without induction of MAS-YFP expression and in the presence of I138D MAS-YFP. The C-terminal tail of the AT(1) receptor is a known target for PKC-mediated phosphorylation. In cells stably expressing a C-terminally truncated version of the AT receptor, induction of MAS expression did not up-regulate the truncated construct levels. These data demonstrate that the ability of MAS to up-regulate AT(1) receptor levels reflects the constitutive capacity of MAS to activate Galpha(q)/Galpha(11) and hence stimulate PKC-dependent phosphorylation of the AT(1) receptor.     

Sphingosylphosphorylcholine-induced contraction of feline ileal smooth muscle cells is mediated by Galphai3 protein and MAPK

We studied the mechanism of sphingosylphosphorylcholine (SPC)-induced contraction in feline ileal smooth muscle cells. Western blotting revealed that G protein subtypes of Galpha(i1), Galpha(i3) and Galpha(o) existed in feline ileum. Galpha(i3) antibody penetration into permeabilized cells decreased SPC-induced contraction. In addition, incubation of [35S]guanosine 5'-O-(3-thiotriphosphate) ([35S]GTPgammaS) with membrane fraction increased its binding to Galpha(i3) subtype after SPC treatment, suggesting that the signalling pathways invoked by SPC were mediated by Galpha(i3) protein. MAPK kinase (MEK) inhibitor PD98059 blocked the contraction significantly, but p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) inhibitor SB202190 did not. Chelerythrine and neomycin also inhibited the contraction. However, cotreatment of PD98059 and chelerythrine showed no significant difference. Phosphorylation of p44/42 MAPK was increased by SPC treatment, which was reversed by pretreatment of inhibitors of signalling molecules that decreased SPC-induced contraction previously. The same result was obtained in the assay of MAPK activity.     

Defect of receptor-G protein coupling in human gallbladder with cholesterol stones

Human gallbladders with cholesterol stones (ChS) exhibit an impaired muscle contraction and relaxation and a lower CCK receptor-binding capacity compared with those with pigment stones (PS). This study was designed to determine whether there is an abnormal receptor-G protein coupling in human gallbladders with ChS using (35)S-labeled guanosine 5'-O-(3-thiotriphosphate) ([(35)S]GTPgammaS) binding, (125)I-labeled CCK-8 autoradiography, immunoblotting, and G protein quantitation. CCK and vasoactive intestinal peptide caused significant increases in [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding to Galpha(i-3) and G(s)alpha, respectively. The binding was lower in ChS than in PS (P < 0.01). The reduced [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding in ChS was normalized after the muscles were treated with cholesterol-free liposomes (P < 0.01). Autoradiography and immunoblots showed a decreased optical density (OD) for CCK receptors, an even lower OD value for receptor-G protein coupling, and a higher OD for uncoupled receptors or Galpha(i-3) protein in ChS compared with PS (P < 0.001). G protein quantitation also showed that there were no significant differences in the Galpha(i-3) and G(s)alpha content in ChS and PS. We conclude that, in addition to an impaired CCK receptor-binding capacity, there is a defect in receptor-G protein coupling in muscle cells from gallbladder with ChS. These changes may be normalized after removal of excess cholesterol from the plasma membrane.     

Characterization of the Arabidopsis heterotrimeric G protein

We have used fluorescence resonance energy transfer and co-immunoprecipitation to analyze the interactions among the alpha, beta, and gamma1 subunits of the Arabidopsis heterotrimeric G protein. Using cyan and yellow fluorescent protein fusion constructs, we show that overexpressed Ggamma1 localizes to protoplast membranes, but Gbeta exhibits membrane localization only when the Ggamma1 protein is co-overexpressed. Overexpressed Galpha shows membrane localization unaccompanied by overexpression of either Gbeta or Ggamma1. We detect fluorescence resonance energy transfer between Gbeta and Ggamma1 in the absence of Galpha overexpression and between Galpha and Ggamma1 but only when all three subunits are co-overexpressed. Both Galpha and Gbeta are associated with large macromolecular complexes of approximately 700 kDa in the plasma membrane. Galpha is present in both large complexes and as free Galpha in plasma membranes from wild type plants. In plants homozygous for a null allele of the Gbeta gene, Galpha is associated with smaller complexes in the 200-400-kDa range, indicating that its presence in the large complex depends on association with Gbetagamma. Activation of the Galpha subunit with guanosine 5'-3-O-(thio)triphosphate (GTPgammaS) results in partial dissociation of Galpha from the complex. Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) promotes extensive dissociation of the Galpha complex but does not interfere with binding of GTPgammaS to purified recombinant Galpha, suggesting that reactive oxygen species affect the stability of the large complex but not the activity of Galpha itself.