The Estimation of the Segregation Parameter when Ascertainment is not Complete

Procedures to estimate the genetic segregation parameter when ascertainment of families is incomplete, have previously relied on iterative computer algorithms since estimators with closed form are lacking. We now present the Minimum Variance Unbiased Estimator for the segregation parameter under any ascertainment probability. This estimator assumes a simple form when ascertainment is complete. We also present a simple estimator, akin to Li and Mantel's (1968) estimator, but without the restriction that ascertainment be complete. The performance of these estimators is compared with respect to asymptotic efficiency. We also provide tables that define the required number of families of a given size that need to be sampled to achieve a specific power for testing simple hypothesis on the segregation parameter.     

Interval Estimation of Simple Difference under Independent Negative Binomial Sampling

When the sample size is not large or when the underlying disease is rare, to assure collection of an appropriate number of cases and to control the relative error of estimation, one may employ inverse sampling, in which one continues sampling subjects until one obtains exactly the desired number of cases. This paper focuses discussion on interval estimation of the simple difference between two proportions under independent inverse sampling. This paper develops three asymptotic interval estimators on the basis of the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE), the uniformly minimum variance unbiased estimator (UMVUE), and the asymptotic likelihood ratio test (ALRT). To compare the performance of these three estimators, this paper calculates the coverage probability and the expected length of the resulting confidence intervals on the basis of the exact distribution. This paper finds that when the underlying proportions of cases in both two comparison populations are small or moderate (≤0.20), all three asymptotic interval estimators developed here perform reasonably well even for the pre-determined number of cases as small as 5. When the pre-determined number of cases is moderate or large (≥50), all three estimators are essentially equivalent in all the situations considered here. Because application of the two interval estimators derived from the MLE and the UMVUE does not involve any numerical iterative procedure needed in the ALRT, for simplicity we may use these two estimators without losing efficiency.     

Shrinkage and Pretest Nonparametric Estimation of Regression Parameters from Censored Data with Multiple Observations at Each Level of Covariate

A simple linear regression model is considered where the independent variable assumes only a finite number of values and the response variable is randomly right censored. However, the censoring distribution may depend on the covariate values. A class of noniterative estimators for the slope parameter, namely, the noniterative unrestricted estimator, noniterative restricted estimator and noniterative improved pretest estimator are proposed. The asymptotic bias and mean squared errors of the proposed estimators are derived and compared. The relative dominance picture of the estimators is investigated. A simulation study is also performed to asses the properties of the various estimators for small samples.     

Nonparametric and semiparametric estimation with sequentially truncated survival data

In observational cohort studies with complex sampling schemes, truncation arises when the time to event of interest is observed only when it falls below or exceeds another random time, that is, the truncation time. In more complex settings, observation may require a particular ordering of event times; we refer to this as sequential truncation. Estimators of the event time distribution have been developed for simple left-truncated or right-truncated data. However, these estimators may be inconsistent under sequential truncation. We propose nonparametric and semiparametric maximum likelihood estimators for the distribution of the event time of interest in the presence of sequential truncation, under two truncation models. We show the equivalence of an inverse probability weighted estimator and a product limit estimator under one of these models. We study the large sample properties of the proposed estimators and derive their asymptotic variance estimators. We evaluate the proposed methods through simulation studies and apply the methods to an Alzheimer's disease study. We have developed an R package, seqTrun , for implementation of our method.     

Comparison of recent estimators of interclass correlation from familial data

The asymptotic and finite-sample properties of several recent estimators of interclass correlation are compared to more traditional estimators in the case of a variable number of siblings per family. It is shown that Karlin's family-weighted pairwise estimator (Karlin, Cameron, and Williams, 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 78, 2664-2668) is virtually equivalent to the ensemble estimator (Rosner, Donner, and Hennekens, 1977, Applied Statistics 26, 179-187), thus suggesting an estimator of the former's asymptotic variance. Further, an estimator proposed by Srivastava (1984, Biometrika 71, 177-185) is shown to be identical to the modified sib-mean estimator (Konishi, 1982, Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics 34, 505-515) when the sib-sib correlation is estimated by the method of unweighted group means. Although the estimator due to Srivastava has smaller asymptotic variance than the other two, the gain in efficiency is slight, for familial data, both asymptotically and in finite samples.     

Closed Form Estimators of Latent Cell Frequencies

One-stage and two-stage closed form estimators of latent cell frequencies in multidimensional contingency tables are derived from the weighted least squares criterion. The first stage estimator is asymptotically equivalent to the conditional maximum likelihood estimator and does not necessarily have minimum asymptotic variance. The second stage estimator does have minimum asymptotic variance relative to any other existing estimator. The closed form estimators are defined for any number of latent cells in contingency tables of any order under exact general linear constraints on the logarithms of the nonlatent and latent cell frequencies.     

Estimation of the size of an open population from capture-recapture data using weighted martingale methods

A weighted martingale method, akin to a moving average, is proposed to allow the use of modified closed-population methods in the estimation of the size of a smoothly changing open population when there are frequent capture occasions. We concentrate here on modifications to martingale estimating functions for model Mt, but a wide range of closed-population estimators may be modified in this fashion. The method is motivated by and applied to weekly capture-recapture data from the Mai Po bird sanctuary in Hong Kong. Simulations show that the weighted martingale estimator compared well with the Jolly-Seber estimator when the conditions for the latter to be valid are met, and it performed far better when individuals were allowed to leave and reenter the population. Expressions are derived for the asymptotic bias and variance of the estimator in an appendix.     

An estimator for pairwise relatedness using molecular markers

I propose a new estimator for jointly estimating two-gene and four-gene coefficients of relatedness between individuals from an outbreeding population with data on codominant genetic markers and compare it, by Monte Carlo simulations, to previous ones in precision and accuracy for different distributions of population allele frequencies, numbers of alleles per locus, actual relationships, sample sizes, and proportions of relatives included in samples. In contrast to several previous estimators, the new estimator is well behaved and applies to any number of alleles per locus and any allele frequency distribution. The estimates for two- and four-gene coefficients of relatedness from the new estimator are unbiased irrespective of the sample size and have sampling variances decreasing consistently with an increasing number of alleles per locus to the minimum asymptotic values determined by the variation in identity-by-descent among loci per se, regardless of the actual relationship. The new estimator is also robust for small sample sizes and for unknown relatives being included in samples for estimating allele frequencies. Compared to previous estimators, the new one is generally advantageous, especially for highly polymorphic loci and/or small sample sizes.     

A Note on Variance Estimation of the Aalen–Johansen Estimator of the Cumulative Incidence Function in Competing Risks,with a View towards Left‐Truncated Data

The Aalen–Johansen estimator is the standard nonparametric estimator of the cumulative incidence function in competing risks. Estimating its variance in small samples has attracted some interest recently, together with a critique of the usual martingale‐based estimators. We show that the preferred estimator equals a Greenwood‐type estimator that has been derived as a recursion formula using counting processes and martingales in a more general multistate framework. We also extend previous simulation studies on estimating the variance of the Aalen–Johansen estimator in small samples to left‐truncated observation schemes, which may conveniently be handled within the counting processes framework. This investigation is motivated by a real data example on spontaneous abortion in pregnancies exposed to coumarin derivatives, where both competing risks and left‐truncation have recently been shown to be crucial methodological issues (Meister and Schaefer (2008), Reproductive Toxicology 26 , 31–35). Multistate‐type software and data are available online to perform the analyses. The Greenwood‐type estimator is recommended for use in practice.     

Multiple Imputation Methods for Estimating Regression Coefficients in the Competing Risks Model with Missing Cause of Failure

We propose a method to estimate the regression coefficients in a competing risks model where the cause-specific hazard for the cause of interest is related to covariates through a proportional hazards relationship and when cause of failure is missing for some individuals. We use multiple imputation procedures to impute missing cause of failure, where the probability that a missing cause is the cause of interest may depend on auxiliary covariates, and combine the maximum partial likelihood estimators computed from several imputed data sets into an estimator that is consistent and asymptotically normal. A consistent estimator for the asymptotic variance is also derived. Simulation results suggest the relevance of the theory in finite samples. Results are also illustrated with data from a breast cancer study.     

Detecting the undetected: estimating the total number of loci underlying a quantitative trait

Recent studies have begun to reveal the genes underlying quantitative trait differences between closely related populations. Not all quantitative trait loci (QTL) are, however, equally likely to be detected. QTL studies involve a limited number of crosses, individuals, and genetic markers and, as a result, often have little power to detect genetic factors of small to moderate effects. In this article, we develop an estimator for the total number of fixed genetic differences between two parental lines. Like the Castle-Wright estimator, which is based on the observed segregation variance in classical crossbreeding experiments, our QTL-based estimator requires that a distribution be specified for the expected effect sizes of the underlying loci. We use this expected distribution and the observed mean and minimum effect size of the detected QTL in a likelihood model to estimate the total number of loci underlying the trait difference. We then test the QTL-based estimator and the Castle-Wright estimator in Monte Carlo simulations. When the assumptions of the simulations match those of the model, both estimators perform well on average. The 95% confidence limits of the Castle-Wright estimator, however, often excluded the true number of underlying loci, while the confidence limits for the QTL-based estimator typically included the true value approximately 95% of the time. Furthermore, we found that the QTL-based estimator was less sensitive to dominance and to allelic effects of opposite sign than the Castle-Wright estimator. We therefore suggest that the QTL-based estimator be used to assess how many loci may have been missed in QTL studies.     

Small Sample Bias and Variance of Lincoln-Petersen and Bailey Estimators

The Lincoln-Petersen and Bailey estimators of an unknown population size were compared in a computer simulation of capture-recapture sampling with replacement from small populations. The Bailey estimator was negatively biased and had smaller variance than the Petersen estimator. The Petersen estimator tended to be positively biased. The Lincoln-Petersen variance estimator tended to be positively biased while the Bailey variance estimator was negatively biased.     

Nonparametric analysis of recurrent events and death

This article is concerned with the analysis of recurrent events in the presence of a terminal event such as death. We consider the mean frequency function, defined as the marginal mean of the cumulative number of recurrent events over time. A simple nonparametric estimator for this quantity is presented. It is shown that the estimator, properly normalized, converges weakly to a zero-mean Gaussian process with an easily estimable covariance function. Nonparametric statistics for comparing two mean frequency functions and for combining data on recurrent events and death are also developed. The asymptotic null distributions of these statistics, together with consistent variance estimators, are derived. The small-sample properties of the proposed estimators and test statistics are examined through simulation studies. An application to a cancer clinical trial is provided.     

Estimating standardized risk differences from odds ratios

Holland (1989, Biometrics 45, 1009-1016) gave simple formulas for an "adjusted" risk difference based on the Mantel-Haenszel odds ratio estimator and its variance. This "adjusted" risk difference is, in general, inconsistent, but Holland's variance formula is an immediate corollary of a more general formula by Greenland (1987, Journal of Chronic Diseases 40, 1087-1094). We show how, under a large-stratum limiting model, one can derive consistent estimators of standardized risk differences from any consistent odds ratio estimator. We also show how one can derive nonparametric standardized estimators under a sparse-data limiting model.     

Incomplete generalized U-statistics for food risk assessment

This article proposes statistical tools for quantitative evaluation of the risk due to the presence of some particular contaminants in food. We focus on the estimation of the probability of the exposure to exceed the so-called provisional tolerable weekly intake (PTWI), when both consumption data and contamination data are independently available. A Monte Carlo approximation of the plug-in estimator, which may be seen as an incomplete generalized U-statistic, is investigated. We obtain the asymptotic properties of this estimator and propose several confidence intervals, based on two estimators of the asymptotic variance: (i) a bootstrap type estimator and (ii) an approximate jackknife estimator relying on the Hoeffding decomposition of the original U-statistics. As an illustration, we present an evaluation of the exposure to Ochratoxin A in France.     

Comparative evaluation of a new effective population size estimator based on approximate bayesian computation

We describe and evaluate a new estimator of the effective population size (N(e)), a critical parameter in evolutionary and conservation biology. This new "SummStat" N(e) estimator is based upon the use of summary statistics in an approximate Bayesian computation framework to infer N(e). Simulations of a Wright-Fisher population with known N(e) show that the SummStat estimator is useful across a realistic range of individuals and loci sampled, generations between samples, and N(e) values. We also address the paucity of information about the relative performance of N(e) estimators by comparing the SummStat estimator to two recently developed likelihood-based estimators and a traditional moment-based estimator. The SummStat estimator is the least biased of the four estimators compared. In 32 of 36 parameter combinations investigated using initial allele frequencies drawn from a Dirichlet distribution, it has the lowest bias. The relative mean square error (RMSE) of the SummStat estimator was generally intermediate to the others. All of the estimators had RMSE > 1 when small samples (n = 20, five loci) were collected a generation apart. In contrast, when samples were separated by three or more generations and N(e) < or = 50, the SummStat and likelihood-based estimators all had greatly reduced RMSE. Under the conditions simulated, SummStat confidence intervals were more conservative than the likelihood-based estimators and more likely to include true N(e). The greatest strength of the SummStat estimator is its flexible structure. This flexibility allows it to incorporate any potentially informative summary statistic from population genetic data.     

Shrinkage Estimators for Covariance Matrices

Estimation of covariance matrices in small samples has been studied by many authors. Standard estimators, like the unstructured maximum likelihood estimator (ML) or restricted maximum likelihood (REML) estimator, can be very unstable with the smallest estimated eigenvalues being too small and the largest too big. A standard approach to more stably estimating the matrix in small samples is to compute the ML or REML estimator under some simple structure that involves estimation of fewer parameters, such as compound symmetry or independence. However, these estimators will not be consistent unless the hypothesized structure is correct. If interest focuses on estimation of regression coefficients with correlated (or longitudinal) data, a sandwich estimator of the covariance matrix may be used to provide standard errors for the estimated coefficients that are robust in the sense that they remain consistent under misspecification of the covariance structure. With large matrices, however, the inefficiency of the sandwich estimator becomes worrisome. We consider here two general shrinkage approaches to estimating the covariance matrix and regression coefficients. The first involves shrinking the eigenvalues of the unstructured ML or REML estimator. The second involves shrinking an unstructured estimator toward a structured estimator. For both cases, the data determine the amount of shrinkage. These estimators are consistent and give consistent and asymptotically efficient estimates for regression coefficients. Simulations show the improved operating characteristics of the shrinkage estimators of the covariance matrix and the regression coefficients in finite samples. The final estimator chosen includes a combination of both shrinkage approaches, i.e., shrinking the eigenvalues and then shrinking toward structure. We illustrate our approach on a sleep EEG study that requires estimation of a 24 x 24 covariance matrix and for which inferences on mean parameters critically depend on the covariance estimator chosen. We recommend making inference using a particular shrinkage estimator that provides a reasonable compromise between structured and unstructured estimators.     

Model misspecification and bias for inverse probability weighting estimators of average causal effects

Commonly used semiparametric estimators of causal effects specify parametric models for the propensity score (PS) and the conditional outcome. An example is an augmented inverse probability weighting (IPW) estimator, frequently referred to as a doubly robust estimator, because it is consistent if at least one of the two models is correctly specified. However, in many observational studies, the role of the parametric models is often not to provide a representation of the data-generating process but rather to facilitate the adjustment for confounding, making the assumption of at least one true model unlikely to hold. In this paper, we propose a crude analytical approach to study the large-sample bias of estimators when the models are assumed to be approximations of the data-generating process, namely, when all models are misspecified. We apply our approach to three prototypical estimators of the average causal effect, two IPW estimators, using a misspecified PS model, and an augmented IPW (AIPW) estimator, using misspecified models for the outcome regression (OR) and the PS. For the two IPW estimators, we show that normalization, in addition to having a smaller variance, also offers some protection against bias due to model misspecification. To analyze the question of when the use of two misspecified models is better than one we derive necessary and sufficient conditions for when the AIPW estimator has a smaller bias than a simple IPW estimator and when it has a smaller bias than an IPW estimator with normalized weights. If the misspecification of the outcome model is moderate, the comparisons of the biases of the IPW and AIPW estimators show that the AIPW estimator has a smaller bias than the IPW estimators. However, all biases include a scaling with the PS-model error and we suggest caution in modeling the PS whenever such a model is involved. For numerical and finite sample illustrations, we include three simulation studies and corresponding approximations of the large-sample biases. In a dataset from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, we estimate the effect of smoking on blood lead levels.     

On the asymptotics of penalized splines

We study the asymptotic behaviour of penalized spline estimatorsin the univariate case. We use B-splines and a penalty is placedon mth-order differences of the coefficients. The number ofknots is assumed to converge to infinity as the sample sizeincreases. We show that penalized splines behave similarly toNadaraya--Watson kernel estimators with ‘equivalent’kernels depending upon m. The equivalent kernels we obtain forpenalized splines are the same as those found by Silverman forsmoothing splines. The asymptotic distribution of the penalizedspline estimator is Gaussian and we give simple expressionsfor the asymptotic mean and variance. Provided that it is fastenough, the rate at which the number of knots converges to infinitydoes not affect the asymptotic distribution. The optimal rateof convergence of the penalty parameter is given. Penalizedsplines are not design-adaptive.     

Asymptotically efficient two-step estimators of the hazards ratio for follow-up studies and survival data

Asymptotically efficient estimators of a common hazard rate ratio (for follow-up studies) and the proportional hazards ratio (for survival studies) are obtained by a single iteration of the "Mantel-Haenszel" estimator appropriate for each setting. Estimators of their variance are also developed. The two-step estimator for survival data and its variance estimator are shown by simulation to be minimally biased and the estimator is shown to be efficient relative to the Cox partial likelihood estimator in small samples.