Wild-type but not mutant p53 activates the hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor promoter.

p53 transactivates the expression of a variety of genes by binding to specific DNA sequences within the promoter. We have investigated the ability of wild-type p53 and a non-DNA binding p53 mutant to activate the hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor (HGF/SF) promoter using chloramphenicol acetyltransferase reporter constructs. We also used deletion sequences of the HGF/SF promoter to identify which regions, if any, were responsible for p53 binding. Our results show that wild-type but not mutant p53 activates the HGF/SF promoter when using -3000 and -755 bp upstream of the HGF/SF gene. This activation is lost when promoter sequences covering -365 and -239 bp are used. Analysis of the DNA sequence between -365 and -755 bp shows one putative p53 half-site with 80% homology to the consensus sequence and another half-site 3 bases downstream of this with 100% homology to the consensus sequence. In contrast to previously identified p53 binding DNA sequences, the downstream half-site is inverted. We propose that the HGF/SF promoter can be activated by wild-type p53 in vivo and that this could be as a result of a novel form of sequence-specific DNA binding.     

Role of the spacer between the -35 and -10 regions in sigmas promoter selectivity in Escherichia coli

In vitro, the sigma(s) subunit of RNA polymerase (RNAP), RpoS, recognizes nearly identical -35 and -10 promoter consensus sequences as the vegetative sigma70. In vivo, promoter selectivity of RNAP holoenzyme containing either sigma(s) (Esigma(s)) or sigma70 (Esigma70) seems to be achieved by the differential ability of the two holoenzymes to tolerate deviations from the promoter consensus sequence. In this study, we suggest that many natural sigma(s)-dependent promoters possess a -35 element, a feature that has been considered as not conserved among sigma(s)-dependent promoters. These -35 hexamers are mostly non-optimally spaced from the -10 region, but nevertheless functional. A +/- 2 bp deviation from the optimal spacer length of 17 bp or the complete absence of a -35 consensus sequence decreases overall promoter activity, but at the same time favours Esigma(s) in its competition with Esigma70 for promoter recognition. On the other hand, the reduction of promoter activity due to shifting of the -35 element can be counterbalanced by an activity-stimulating feature such as A/T-richness of the spacer region without compromising Esigma(s) selectivity. Based on mutational analysis of sigma(s), we suggest a role of regions 2.5 and 4 of sigma(s) in sensing sub-optimally located -35 elements.