A single residue (arg46) located within the N-terminus of the V1a vasopressin receptor is critical for binding vasopressin but not peptide or nonpeptide antagonists

A fundamental issue in molecular endocrinology is to define how agonist:receptor interaction differs from antagonist:receptor interaction. The vasopressin V1a receptor (V1aR) is a member of a subfamily of related G protein-coupled receptors that are activated by the hormone AVP or related peptides. The N-terminus of the V1aR has recently been shown to be critical for binding agonists but not antagonists. Using a combination of N-terminally truncated constructs and alanine-scanning mutagenesis, individual residues that provide these agonist-specific binding epitopes have now been identified in this study. Our data establish that a single residue, Arg46, is critical for AVP binding to the V1aR. Systematic substitution revealed that Arg was required at this locus and could not be substituted by Lys, Glu, Leu, or Ala. In contrast, antagonist binding (cyclic or linear, peptide or nonpeptide) was unaffected. Disruption of Arg46 also resulted in defective intracellular signaling. Arginine is conserved at this locus in all members of the neurohypophysial peptide hormone receptor family cloned to date, indicative of a fundamental role in receptor function. In addition to Arg46, the residues Leu42, Gly43, Asp45 form a patch contributing to AVP binding. This study provides molecular insight into the role of the V1aR N-terminus and key differences between agonist and antagonist binding requirements.     

The N-terminal juxtamembrane segment of the V1a vasopressin receptor provides two independent epitopes required for high-affinity agonist binding and signaling

It is fundamentally important to define how agonist-receptor interaction differs from antagonist-receptor interaction. The V1a vasopressin receptor (V1aR) is a member of the neurohypophysial hormone subfamily of G protein-coupled receptors. Using alanine-scanning mutagenesis of the N-terminal juxtamembrane segment of the V1aR, we now establish that Glu54 (1.35) is critical for arginine vasopressin binding. The mutant [E54A]V1aR exhibited decreased arginine vasopressin affinity (1700-fold) and disrupted signaling, but antagonist binding was unaffected. Mutation of Glu54 had an almost identical pharmacological effect as mutation of Arg46, raising the possibility that agonist binding required a mutual interaction between Glu54 and Arg46. The role of these two charged residues was investigated by 1) substituting Glu54; 2) inserting additional Glu/Arg in transmembrane helix (TM) 1; 3) repositioning the Glu/Arg in TM1; and 4) characterizing the reciprocal mutant [R46E/E54R]V1aR. We conclude that 1) the positive/negative charges need to be precisely positioned in this N terminus/TM1 segment; and 2) Glu54 and Arg46 function independently, providing two discrete epitopes required for high-affinity agonist binding and signaling. This study explains why Glu and Arg, part of an -R(X3)L/V(X3)E(X3)L- motif, are conserved at these loci throughout this G protein-coupled receptor subfamily and provides molecular insight into key differences between agonist and antagonist binding requirements.     

Tyr115 is the key residue for determining agonist selectivity in the V1a vasopressin receptor.

Using a three-dimensional model of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR), we have previously succeeded in docking the neurohypophysial hormone arginine-vasopressin (AVP) into the V1a receptor. According to this model, the hormone is completely embedded in the transmembrane part of the receptor. Only the side chain of the Arg residue at position 8 projects outside the transmembrane core of the receptor and possibly interacts with a Tyr residue located in the first extracellular loop at position 115. Residue 8 varies in the two natural neurohypophysial hormones, AVP and oxytocin (OT); similarly, different residues are present at position 115 in the different members of the AVP/OT receptor family. Here we show that Arg8 is crucial for high affinity binding of AVP to the rat V1a receptor. Moreover, when Tyr115 is replaced by an Asp and a Phe, the amino acids naturally occurring in the V2 and in the OT receptor subtypes, the agonist selectivity of the V1a receptor switches accordingly. Our results indicate that the interaction between peptide residue 8 and the receptor residue at position 115 is not only crucial for agonist high affinity binding but also for receptor selectivity.     

Critical role of a subdomain of the N-terminus of the V1a vasopressin receptor for binding agonists but not antagonists; functional rescue by the oxytocin receptor N-terminus

A fundamental issue in molecular pharmacology is to define how agonist:receptor interaction differs from that of antagonist:receptor. The V(1a) receptor (V(1a)R) is a member of a family of related G-protein-coupled receptors that are activated by the neurohypophysial peptide hormone arginine-vasopressin (AVP). Here we define a short subdomain of the N-terminus of the V(1a)R from Glu(37) to Asn(47) that is an absolute requirement for binding AVP and other agonists. In marked contrast to the situation for agonists, deleting this segment has little or no effect on the binding of either peptide or non-peptide antagonists. In addition, we established that this subdomain was crucial for receptor activation and second messenger generation. The oxytocin receptor (OTR) also binds AVP with high affinity but exhibits a different pharmacological profile to the V(1a)R. Substitution of the N-terminus of the V(1a)R with the corresponding sequence from the OTR generated a chimeric receptor (OTR(N)-V(1a)R). The presence of the OTR N-terminus recovered high affinity agonist binding such that the OTR(N)-V(1a)R possessed almost wild-type V(1a)R pharmacology and signaling. Consequently, a domain within the N-terminus is required for agonist binding but it does not provide the molecular discriminator for subtype-selective agonist recognition. Cotransfection and peptide mimetic studies demonstrated that this N-terminal subdomain had to be contiguous with the receptor polypeptide to be functional. This study establishes that a segment of the V(1a)R N-terminus has a pivotal role in the mechanism of agonist binding and provides molecular insight into key differences between the interaction of agonists and antagonists with a peptide receptor family.     

Analysis of interactions responsible for vasopressin binding to human neurohypophyseal hormone receptors-molecular dynamics study of the activated receptor-vasopressin-G(alpha) systems.

Vasopressin (CYFQNCPRG-NH(2), AVP) is a semicyclic endogenous peptide, which exerts a variety of biological effects in mammals. The main physiological roles of AVP are the regulation of water balance and the control of blood pressure and adrenocorticotropin hormone (ACTH) secretion, mediated via three different subtypes of vasopressin receptors: V1a, V1b and V2 receptors (V1aR, V1bR and V2R, respectively). They are the members of the class A, G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). AVP also modulates several behavioral and social functions. In this study, the interactions responsible for AVP binding to vasopressin V1a and V2 receptors versus the closely related oxytocin ([I3,L8]AVP, OT) receptor (OTR) have been investigated. Three-dimensional models of the activated receptors were constructed using multiple sequence alignment, followed by homology modeling using the complex of activated rhodopsin with Gt(alpha) C-terminal peptide of transducin MII-Gt(338-350) prototype as a template. AVP was docked into the receptor-G(alpha) systems. The three lowest-energy pairs of receptor-AVP-G(alpha) (two complexes per each receptor) were selected. The 1-ns unconstrained molecular dynamics (MD) of complexes embedded into the fully hydrated 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphatidylcholine (POPC) lipid bilayer was conducted in the AMBER 7.0 force field. Six relaxed receptor-AVP-G(alpha) models were obtained. The residues responsible for AVP binding to vasopressin receptors have been identified and a different mechanism of AVP binding to V2R than to V1aR has been proposed.     

Vasopressin V2 Receptor/Bioligand Interactions

We predict some essential interactions between the V2 vasopressin renal receptor (V2R) and its agonists [Arg⁸]vasopressin (AVP) and [D-Arg⁸]vasopressin (DAVP), and the non-peptide antagonist OPC-31260. V2R controls antidiuresis and belongs to the superfamily of heptahelical transmembrane (7TM) G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). The receptor was built, the ligands were docked and the structures relaxed using advanced molecular modeling techniques. Docked agonists and antagonists appear to prefer similar V2R compartments. A number of receptor amino acid residues are indicated, mainly in the TM3–TM7 helices, as potentially important in ligand binding. Many of these residues are invariant for either the GPCR superfamily or the subfamily of related (vasopressin V2R, V1aR and V1bR and oxytocin OR) receptors. Moreover, some of the equivalent residues in V1aR have already been found critical for ligand affinity [Mouillac et al., J. Biol. Chem., 270 (1995) 25771].     

Vasopressin V2 Receptor/Bioligand Interactions

Summary We predict some essential interactions between the V2 vasopressin renal receptor (V2R) and its agonists [Arg⁸]vasopressin (AVP) and [D-Arg⁸]vasopressin (DAVP), and the non-peptide antagonist OPC-31260. V2R controls antidiuresis and belongs to the superfamily of heptahelical transmembrane (7TM) G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). The receptor was built, the ligands were docked and the structures relaxed using advanced molecular modeling techniques. Docked agonists and antagonists appear to prefer similar V2R compartments. A number of receptor amino acid residues are indicated, mainly in the TM3-TM7 helices, as potentially important in ligand binding. Many of these residues are invariant for either the GPCR superfamily or the subfamily of related (vasopressin V2R, V1aR and V1bR and oxytocin OR) receptors. Moreover, some of the equivalent residues in V1aR have already been found critical for ligand affinity [Mouillac et al., J. Biol. Chem., 270 (1995) 25771].     

Palmitoylation of the vasopressin V1a receptor reveals different conformational requirements for signaling, agonist-induced receptor phosphorylation, and sequestration

In this study, we establish that the V1a vasopressin receptor (V1aR) is palmitoylated, and we show that this modification has an important functional role. Palmitoylation of the V1aR occurs within the Cys371/Cys372 couplet located in the proximal C-terminal tail domain. Substitution of these residues in a [C371G/C372G]V1aR construct effectively disrupted receptor palmitoylation. Our data also indicate an additional palmitoylation site at another locus in the receptor, as yet undefined. [3H]Palmitate incorporation was agonist-sensitive and increased following exposure to [Arg8]vasopressin (AVP). Given the hydrophobic nature of the acyl chain, palmitoylation of the C terminus of G-protein-coupled receptors has been proposed to form an additional intracellular loop. Consequently, palmitoylation/depalmitoylation will have a profound effect on the local conformation of this domain. The V1aR palmitoylation status regulated both phosphorylation and sequestration of the receptor, and furthermore, palmitoylation, phosphorylation, and sequestration were all regulated by AVP. The palmitoylation-defective construct [C371G/C372G]V1aR exhibited decreased phosphorylation compared to wild-type V1aR, under both basal and AVP-stimulated conditions, and was sequestered at a faster rate. In contrast, the binding of four different classes of ligand and intracellular signaling were not affected by palmitoylation. This study therefore establishes that there are different conformational requirements for signaling, agonist-induced phosphorylation, and sequestration of the V1aR.     

Characterization of rodent liver and kidney AVP receptors: pharmacologic evidence for species differences.

Radioligand binding studies with [3H]vasopressin (AVP) were used to determine the affinities of AVP receptor agonists and antagonists for mouse liver and kidney plasma membrane preparations. Both membrane preparations exhibited one class of high-affinity binding site. AVP ligand binding inhibition studies confirmed that mouse liver binding sites belong to the V1A subtype while kidney binding sites belong to the V2 receptor subtype. The affinity of each ligand for mouse V1A receptors was very similar to that for rat V1A receptors, showing differences in Ki values of less than 3-fold. In contrast, several peptide (d(CH2)5Tyr(Me)AVP) and nonpeptide (OPC-21268 and SR 49059) ligands had different affinities for mouse and rat kidney V2 receptors, with differences in Ki values ranging from 14- to 17-fold. These results indicate that mouse and rat kidney V2 receptors show significant pharmacologic differences.     

Agonist-specific, high-affinity binding epitopes are contributed by an arginine in the N-terminus of the human oxytocin receptor

The effects of the peptide hormone oxytocin (OT) are mediated by the oxytocin receptor, which is a member of the G-protein-coupled receptor family. Defining differences between the binding of agonists and antagonists to the OTR, at the molecular level, is of fundamental importance to understanding OTR activation and to rational drug design. Previous reports have indicated that the N-terminus of the OTR is required for OT binding. The aim of this study was to identify which individual residues within the N-terminal domain of the human OTR provided these OT binding epitopes. A series of truncated OTRs and mutant receptor constructs with systematic alanine substitution were characterized with respect to their pharmacological profile and intracellular signaling capability. Although a number of residues within the OTR will be required for optimal OT-OTR interaction, our data establish that Arg(34) within the N-terminal domain contributes to high-affinity OT binding. Removal of Arg(34) by truncation or substitution resulted in a 2000-fold decrease in OT affinity. In addition, we show that the arginyl at this locus is required for high-affinity binding of agonists in general. However, the importance of Arg(34) is restricted to agonist interaction with the OTR, as it was not required for binding peptide antagonist or non-peptide antagonist. It is noteworthy that the corresponding Arg in the related rat V(1a) vasopressin receptor is also required for high-affinity agonist binding. This study defines, at the molecular level, the role of the N-terminus of the OTR in high-affinity agonist binding and identifies a key residue for this function.     

Conserved aromatic residues in the transmembrane region VI of the V1a vasopressin receptor differentiate agonist vs. antagonist ligand binding.

Despite their opposite effects on signal transduction, the nonapeptide hormone arginine-vasopressin (AVP) and its V1a receptor-selective cyclic peptide antagonist d(CH2)5[Tyr(Me)2]AVP display homologous primary structures, differing only at residues 1 and 2. These structural similarities led us to hypothesize that both ligands could interact with the same binding pocket in the V1a receptor. To determine receptor residues responsible for discriminating binding of agonist and antagonist ligands, we performed site-directed mutagenesis of conserved aromatic and hydrophilic residues as well as nonconserved residues, all located in the transmembrane binding pocket of the V1a receptor. Mutation of aromatic residues of transmembrane region VI (W304, F307, F308) reduced affinity for the d(CH2)5[Tyr(Me)2]AVP and markedly decreased affinity for the unrelated strongly hydrophobic V1a-selective nonpeptide antagonist SR 49059. Replacement of these aromatic residues had no effect on AVP binding, but increased AVP-induced coupling efficacy of the receptor for its G protein. Mutating hydrophilic residues Q108, K128 and Q185 in transmembrane regions II, III and IV, respectively, led to a decrease in affinity for both agonists and antagonists. Finally, the nonconserved residues T333 and A334 in transmembrane region VII, controlled the V1a/V2 binding selectivity for both nonpeptide and cyclic peptide antagonists. Thus, because conserved aromatic residues of the V1a receptor binding pocket seem essential for antagonists and do not contribute at all to the binding of agonists, we propose that these residues differentiate agonist vs. antagonist ligand binding.     

Comparative agonist/antagonist responses in mutant human C5a receptors define the ligand binding site

The C terminus is responsible for all of the agonist activity of C5a at human C5a receptors (C5aRs). In this report we have mapped the ligand binding site on the C5aR using a series of agonist and antagonist peptide mimics of the C terminus of C5a as well as receptors mutated at putative interaction sites (Ile(116), Arg(175,) Arg(206), Glu(199), Asp(282), and Val(286)). Agonist peptide 1 (Phe-Lys-Pro-d-cyclohexylalanine-cyclohexylalanine-d-Arg) can be converted to an antagonist by substituting the bulkier Trp for cyclohexylalanine at position 5 (peptide 2). Conversely, mutation of C5aR transmembrane residue Ile(116) to the smaller Ala (I116A) makes the receptor respond to peptide 2 as an agonist (Gerber, B. O., Meng, E. C., Dotsch, V., Baranski, T. J., and Bourne, H. R. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 3394-3400). However, a potent cyclic hexapeptide antagonist, Phe-cyclo-[Orn-Pro-d-cyclohexylalanine-Trp-Arg] (peptide 3), derived from peptide 2 and which binds to the same receptor site, remains a full antagonist at I116AC5aR. This suggests that although the residue at position 5 might bind near to Ile(116), the latter is not essential for either activation or antagonism. Arg(206) and Arg(175) both appear to interact with the C-terminal carboxylate of C5a agonist peptides, suggesting a dynamic binding mechanism that may be a part of a receptor activation switch. Asp(282) has been previously shown to interact with the side chain of the C-terminal Arg residue, and Glu(199) may also interact with this side chain in both C5a and peptide mimics. Using these interactions to orient NMR-derived ligand structures in the binding site of C5aR, a new model of the interaction between peptide antagonists and the C5aR is presented.     

Desensitization of vasopressin sensitive adenylate cyclase by vasopressin and phorbol esters

Desensitization of vasopressin V2 receptor-mediated adenylate cyclase was studied in canine kidney cell line, MDCK cells. Overnight treatment of MDCK cells with arginine vasopressin (AVP) resulted in a loss of vasopressin receptors and an inhibition of cAMP accumulation in response to AVP. Both the loss of receptor and reduction in cAMP accumulation were time- and AVP concentration-dependent. Desensitization was selective for AVP because cAMP formation in response to isoproterenol, prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) and forskolin was not affected by AVP pre-treatment. Pre-treatment of MDCK cells with phorbol dibutyrate (PDBu) also caused a dose-dependent inhibition of AVP mediated cAMP accumulation, but not of isoproterenol-, PGE1- and forskolin-induced cAMP accumulation. PDBu pre-treatment did not cause loss of vasopressin receptors. Instead, the affinity for vasopressin was changed by PDBu treatment. Pre-treatment of the cells with pertussis toxin (PT) had no effect on the desensitization and downregulation of vasopressin (V2) receptors, suggesting that the desensitization may not be mediated by pertussis toxin sensitive G-protein. Our data suggest that pre-treatment of MDCK cells with AVP or PDBu caused desensitization of AVP-mediated cAMP accumulation and that downregulation of V2 receptors required agonist occupancy of the receptors, whereas the affinity of the receptors was changed by phorbol ester treatment.     

AVP and Glu systems interact to regulate levels of anxiety in BALB/cJ mice

While the roles of glutamic acid(Glu), arginine vasopressin(AVP) and their respective receptors in anxiety have been thoroughly investigated, the effects of interactions among Glu, N-methyl-D-aspartic acid(NMDA) receptor, AVP and a-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-4-propionic acid(AMPA) receptor on anxiety are still unclear. In the present study, the agonist and antagonist of the NMDA receptor and AMPA receptor, as well as the antagonist of AVP V1 receptor(V1aR) were introduced into BALB/cJ mice by intracerebroventricular microinjection, and the anxiety-like behaviors of the mice were evaluated by open field and elevated plus-maze tests. Compared with C57BL/6 mice, BALB/cJ mice displayed higher levels of anxiety-like behavior. Significant anxiolytic effects were found in the NMDA receptor antagonist(MK-801) and the AMPA receptor or V1 aR antagonist(SSRI49415), as well as combinations of AVP/MK-801 and SSRI49415/DNQX. These results indicated that anxiety-like behaviors expressed in BALB/CJ mice may be due to a coordination disorder among glutamate, NMDA receptor, AMPA receptor, AVP and V1 aR, resulting in the up-regulation of the NMDA receptor and V1 aR and down-regulation of the AMPA receptor. However, because the AMPA receptor can execute its anxiolytic function by suppressing AVP and V1 aR, we cannot exclude the possibility of the NMDA receptor being activated by AVP acting on V1 aR.     

Identification of a novel V1-type AVP receptor based on the molecular recognition theory.

BACKGROUND: The molecular recognition theory predicts that binding domains of peptide hormones and their corresponding receptor binding domains evolved from complementary strands of genomic DNA, and that a process of selective evolutionary mutational events within these primordial domains gave rise to the high affinity and high specificity of peptide hormone-receptor interactions observed today in different peptide hormone-receptor systems. Moreover, this theory has been broadened as a general hypothesis that could explain the evolution of intermolecular protein-protein and intramolecular peptide interactions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Applying a molecular cloning strategy based on the molecular recognition theory, we screened a rat kidney cDNA library with a vasopressin (AVP) antisense oligonucleotide probe, expecting to isolate potential AVP receptors. RESULTS: We isolated a rat kidney cDNA encoding a functional V1-type vasopressin receptor. Structural analysis identified a 135 amino acid-long polypeptide with a single transmembrane domain, quite distinct from the rhodopsin-based G protein-coupled receptor superfamily. Functional analysis of the expressed V1-type receptor in Cos-1 cells revealed AVP-specific binding, AVP-specific coupling to Ca2+ mobilizing transduction system, and characteristic V1-type antagonist inhibition. CONCLUSIONS: This is the second AVP receptor cDNA isolated using AVP antipeptide-based oligonucleotide screening, thus providing compelling evidence in support of the molecular recognition theory as the basis of the evolution of this peptide hormone-receptor system, as well as adds molecular complexity and diversity to AVP receptor systems.     

Vasopressin antisense peptide interactions with the V1 receptor

The molecular recognition hypothesis, that peptide ligands and their receptor binding sites are encoded by complementary nucleotide sequences, was tested for arginine vasopressin (AVP) and its V1 receptor. Binding of [125I] [d(CH2)5,Sar7]AVP (a selective V1 vasopressin antagonist radioligand) or [3H]AVP to rat liver plasma membranes was inhibited by peptides known to bind to V1 receptors but not by the AVP complementary peptide (Ser-Ser-Trp-Ala-Val-Leu-Glu-Val-Ala) (PVA). Rabbit anti-PVA antibodies were nonimmunoreactive with any protein in rat liver membranes or in a partially purified preparation from rat liver containing reconstitutable vasopressin binding activity. Furthermore, there was no suppression of the AVP pressor effect by PVA in vivo using a rat blood pressure bioassay. These findings do not support the hypothesis that the V1 receptor binding site is encoded by the antisense DNA strand to AVP.     

Iodinated photoreactive vasopressin antagonists: labelling of hepatic vasopressin receptor subunits

To identify and characterize V1 vasopressin receptors, photoreactive antagonists of the glycogenolytic and vasoconstrictor activity of vasopressin have been synthesized. The following analogues with 3-mercapto-3,3-cyclopentamethylene-propionic acid (Mca) and N-methylalanine (MeAla) in position 1 and 7 of vasopressin (VP) were effective V1 antagonists: [Mca1, D-Tyr2, MeAla7, Lys8]VP (1), [Mca1, MeAla7, Arg8, Lys9]VP (2), [Mca1, MeAla7, Arg8, D-Lys9]VP (3). Introduction of the photoreactive 4-azidophenylamidino group into the side-chain of Lys8 in analogue 1 or into Lys9 in analogues 2 and 3 increased the potency (for analogue 1 a tenfold increase in the antiglycogenolytic effect and a fivefold increase in the antivasopressor effect) and binding affinity for the rat hepatic V1 receptor. Mono-iodination at Tyr2 with 125I resulted in photoreactive antagonists of high specific radioactivity, which had roughly the same binding affinity as vasopressin for the rat hepatic V1 receptor (Kd = 0.9-1.8 nM). In photoaffinity labelling experiments with purified rat liver membranes, containing 2--3 pmol V1 receptor/mg protein, the analogues labelled specifically two proteins with the relative molecular masses (Mr) of 30,000 and 38,000. These results and the results of a recent study using 3H-labelled photoreactive vasopressin agonists [Boer, R. and Fahrenholz, F. (1985) J. Biol. Chem. 260, 15051-15054] provide evidence that both vasopressin agonists and antagonists can interact with the same two subunits of the heterodimeric hepatic V1 receptor. Furthermore the radioiodinated photoreactive V1 antagonists should be helpful to identify V1 receptor proteins in membranes of other cell types.     

Derivatives of somatic cell hybrids which carry the human gene locus for nephrogenic diabetes insipidus (NDI) express functional vasopressin renal V2-type receptors

The gene responsible for familial vasopressin-resistant nephrogenic diabetes insipidus (NDI) has been localized to a small region of the human X-chromosome (Xq28). A series of hamster lung fibroblast and mouse lymphocyte cell lines carrying fragments of the wild type human X-chromosome was analyzed for vasopressin renal-type V2 receptor expression, to test the hypothesis that the NDI locus may have identity with the V2 receptor gene. V2 receptor binding activity and induction of cAMP production in response to [Arg8] vasopressin (AVP) were exhibited by all cell lines carrying the wild type NDI locus, in contrast to control cell lines. AVP stimulation of cAMP production was concentration-dependent and could be almost completely inhibited by co-incubation with a V2-V1 receptor-specific antagonist. The V2-specific agonist [Mpa1,Val4,Sar7]AVP was as potent as AVP in inducing cAMP production by NDI-DNA-carrying cells, whereas no response was shown to other hormones such as calcitonin, oxytocin (less than 10(-8) M), isoproterenol, or an oxytocin-specific agonist. All results were consistent with the hypothesis that the V2 receptor gene co-localized with the NDI locus, supporting the view that the loci are one and the same.     

Mapping the binding site of arginine vasopressin to V1a and V1b vasopressin receptors

Starting from the 2.8-A resolution x-ray structure of bovine rhodopsin, three-dimensional molecular models of the complexes between arginine vasopressin and two receptor subtypes (V1a, V1b) have been built. Amino acid sequence alignment and docking studies suggest that four key residues (1.35, 2.65, 4.61, and 5.35) fine tune the binding of vasopressin and related peptide agonists to both receptor subtypes. To validate these predictions, a series of single or double mutants were engineered at V1a and V1b receptor subtypes and tested for their binding and functional properties. Two negatively charged amino acids at positions 1.35 and 2.65 are key anchoring residues to the Arg8 residue of arginine vasopressin. Moreover, two amino acids (V(4.61) and P(5.35)) delineating a hydrophobic subsite at the human V1b receptor are responsible for the recognition of V1b selective peptide agonists. Last, one of the latter positions (5.35) is hypothesized to explain the pharmacological species differences between rat and human vasopressin receptors for a V1b peptide agonist. Altogether these refined three-dimensional models of V1a and V1b human receptors should enable the identification of further new selective V1a and V1b agonists as pharmacological but also therapeutic tools.     

Investigation of mechanism of desmopressin binding in vasopressin V2 receptor versus vasopressin V1a and oxytocin receptors: molecular dynamics simulation of the agonist-bound state in the membrane-aqueous system

The vasopressin V2 receptor (V2R) belongs to the Class A G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). V2R is expressed in the renal collecting duct (CD), where it mediates the antidiuretic action of the neurohypophyseal hormone arginine vasopressin (CYFQNCPRG-NH2, AVP). Desmopressin ([1-deamino, 8-D]AVP, dDAVP) is strong selective V2R agonist with negligible pressor and uterotonic activity. In this paper, the interactions responsible for binding of dDAVP to vasopressin V2 receptor versus vasopressin V1a and oxytocin receptors has been examined. Three-dimensional activated models of the receptors were constructed using the multiple sequence alignment and the complex of activated rhodopsin with Gt(alpha) C-terminal peptide of transducin MII-Gt(alpha) (338-350) prototype (Slusarz, R.; Ciarkowski, J. Acta Biochim Pol 2004 51, 129-136) as a template. The 1-ns unconstrained molecular dynamics (MD) of receptor-dDAVP complexes immersed in the fully hydrated 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphatidylcholine (POPC) membrane model was conducted in an Amber 7.0 force field. Highly conserved transmembrane residues have been proposed as being responsible for V2R activation and G protein coupling. Molecular mechanism of the dDAVP binding has been suggested. The internal water molecules involved in an intricate network of the hydrogen bonds inside the receptor cavity have been identified and their role in the stabilization of the agonist-bound state proposed.