The deviated nose: optimizing results using a simplified classification and algorithmic approach

The deviated nose presents a particular challenge to the rhinoplasty surgeon because, frequently, both a functional problem (airway obstruction) and an aesthetic problem must be addressed. An approach to the deviated nose is presented that relies on accurate preoperative planning and precise intraoperative execution of corrective measures to return the nasal dorsum to midline, restore dorsal aesthetic lines, and maintain airway patency. The principles of correction include wide exposure through the open approach, release of all deforming forces to the septum, straightening of the septum while maintaining an adequate dorsal and caudal strut, restoring long-term support, reducing the hypertrophied turbinates, and performing controlled stable percutaneous osteotomies. An operative algorithm is described that emphasizes simplicity and reproducibility, and case studies demonstrate the results that can be achieved with this approach.     

Lengthening the nose with a tongue-and-groove technique

Lengthening the short nose is often a major task. The ability to maintain proper alignment between the nasal base and dorsum may prove difficult without sacrificing the suppleness of the former. In this article, the authors introduce a technique of nose lengthening that ensures alignment of the tip with the rest of the nose yet avoids tip rigidity, unless a significant increase in tip projection is also planned. Two spreader grafts are placed, one on either side of the septum, and are extended beyond the caudal septal angle proportional to the planned nasal lengthening. A columella strut, with the cephalocaudal dimension equaling the combination of the width of the existing medial crura plus the amount of planned nasal lengthening, is placed between the medial crura in continuity with the caudal septum and is fixed to the medial crura using 5-0 clear nylon or polydioxanone suture. If additional projection beyond what is achievable by mere placement of a columella strut is required, the strut is fixed to the spreader grafts in a more projected position. Otherwise, the columella strut is simply positioned between the extensions of the spreader grafts. It is necessary to mobilize the lower lateral cartilages to prevent excessive columella show. This procedure has been performed on 23 patients over the past 12.5 years, with 20 patients enjoying good-to-excellent results. The advantages of this technique include its predictability and reproducibility, and the ability to elongate the nose with a mobile nasal base that is in line with the rest of the nose. If suture fixation is used to gain more projection, the technique proves dependable but the nose will become more rigid than is optimal. The requirement of three pieces of properly shaped septal cartilage, which might not be available when a secondary rhinoplasty is performed, is the major disadvantage of this operation. Furthermore, the procedure is, to some degree, labor-intensive.     

Redefining the Septal L-Strut to Prevent Collapse

During septorhinoplasty, septal cartilage is frequently resected for various purposes but the L-strut is preserved. Numerous materials are inserted into the nasal dorsum during dorsal augmenation rhinoplasty without considering nasal structural safety. This study used a finite element method (FEM) to redefine the septal L-strut, to prevent collapse as pressure moved from the rhinion to the supratip breakpoint on the nasal dorsum and as the contact percentage between the caudal L-strut and the maxillary crest changed. We designed a 1-cm-wide L-strut model based on computed tomography data. At least 45% of the width of the L-strut in the inferior portion of the caudal strut must be preserved during septoplasty to stabilize the septum. In augmentation rhinoplasty, the caudal L-strut must either be preserved perfectly or reinforced to prevent collapse or distortion of the L-strut. The dorsal augmentation material must be fixed in an augmentation pocket to prevent movement of graft material toward the supratip breakpoint, which can disrupt the L-strut. We conducted a numerical analysis using a FEM to predict tissue/organ behavior and to help clinicians understand the reasons for target tissue/organ collapse and deformation.     

Segmental bone and cartilage reconstruction of major nasal dorsal defects

This article describes the results of segmental bone and cartilage reconstruction of significant nasal dorsal defects. Solid bone graft reconstructions frequently lead to an unnatural hardness of the nasal tip. Rib cartilage reconstructions are pliable and soft but are a problem because they easily undergo warpage. The operation is performed using the open approach. Outer cranial bone graft is used for the bone component and extends at least two-thirds of the length of the dorsum. It is secured in place with a compression screw and a Kirschner wire. The cartilage component consists of an abbreviated L strut constructed of septal or conchal cartilage. It is slotted into the cranial bone in a tongue-in-groove manner and is sutured to it through a drill hole in the bone. The dorsal profile is completed with a single cartilage onlay graft or multiple sagittal cartilage grafts secured to the sides of the L strut. Twelve patients underwent segmental reconstruction of nasal deformities. Within this group, five patients underwent secondary rhinoplasty, five underwent posttraumatic rhinoplasty, and two underwent nose augmentation for Oriental features. There were seven men and five women. In all cases, good nasal tip mobility was maintained, and the nasal tips were soft. The interface between the bone graft and cartilage graftwas well camouflaged. The two did not separate. This procedure follows the principle of replacing lost tissue with like materials.     

Surgical correction of the nose and midface in maxillonasal dysplasia (Binder's syndrome)

In 48 patients with maxillonasal dysplasia the retruded nasal base was corrected with onlay cancellous bone grafts after subperiosteal dissection using an oral vestibular approach. Support for the nasal dorsum was achieved in 39 patients with an L-shaped bone graft from the iliac crest introduced through the same approach. The advancement of the nose was found stable on lateral cephalograms; i.e., resorption did not occur. However, the grafts showed considerable remodeling. Half the patients found the stiffness of the nose to be disturbing. In nine patients, the cartilaginous septum was used instead as a support for the nasal dorsum and tip. At operation, the entire cartilaginous septum was mobilized after subperichondrial dissection and rotated forward either pedicled at the nasal dorsum or completely released. Cartilage regenerated in the periochondrial pocket left behind the advanced septum. The anterior transfer of the nose was 6 to 10 mm. The use of septal advancement is preferred over bone implants in the correction of maxillonasal dysplasia in patients in whom the bony nasal dorsum is of adequate height because it results in a soft and flexible nose and the risk of traumatic fracture and resorption is eliminated. The technique has been used in adolescents with promising results.     

Nasal reconstruction based on aesthetic subunits in Orientals

Reconstruction based on the aesthetic subunit principle has yielded good aesthetic outcomes in patients with moderate to severe nasal defects caused by trauma or tumor resection. However, the topographic subunits previously proposed are often unsuitable for Orientals. Compared with the nose in white patients, the nose in Orientals is low, lacks nasal muscle, and has a flat glabella; the structural features of the underlying cartilage and bone are not distinctly reflected in outward appearance. The authors devised aesthetic subunits suitable for Orientals, and they used these units to reconstruct various parts of the nose. The major difference between these units and those presented previously is the lack of soft triangles and the addition of the glabella as an independent unit. The authors divided the nose into the following five topographic units: the glabella, the nasal dorsum, the nasal tip, and the two alae. The border of the nasal dorsum unit was extended to above the maxillonasal suture. The basic reconstruction techniques use a V-Y advancement flap from the forehead to reconstruct the glabella, an island flap from the forehead to reconstruct the nasal dorsum and nasal tip, a nasolabial flap to reconstruct an ala, and a malar flap to reconstruct the cheek. A combination of flaps was used when the defect involved more than one unit. This concept was used for nasal reconstruction in 24 patients. In one patient undergoing reconstruction of the nasal dorsum and in one undergoing reconstruction of the nasal tip, the texture of the forearm flap did not match well, which resulted in a slightly unsatisfactory aesthetic outcome. In one patient in whom the glabella, nasal dorsum, and part of the cheek were reconstructed simultaneously, a web was formed at the medial ocular angle, and a secondary operation was subsequently performed using Z-plasty. In one patient undergoing reconstruction with a forehead flap, defatting was required to reduce the bulk of the subcutaneous flap pedicle at the glabella. However, suture lines were placed in the most inconspicuous sites in all patients, and the use of a trapdoor contraction emphasized the three-dimensional appearance of the nose. The use of these aesthetic subunits for reconstruction offers several advantages, particularly in Oriental patients. Because the nasal dorsum is reconstructed together with the side walls, tenting of the nasal dorsum is avoided, which prevents a flat appearance of the nose. A forehead flap is useful in the repair of complex defects. Defects of the alae should be separately reconstructed with a nasolabial flap to enhance the effect of the trapdoor contraction and to highlight the three-dimensional appearance of the nose. Candidates for reconstruction should be selected on the basis of nasal structure. The results suggest that these units can also be used in some white patients.     

The Turkish delight: a pliable graft for rhinoplasty

In nose surgery, carved or crushed cartilage used as a graft has some disadvantages, chiefly that it may be perceptible through the nasal skin after tissue resolution is complete. To overcome these problems and to obtain a smoother surface, the authors initiated the use of Surgicel-wrapped diced cartilage. This innovative technique has been used by the authors on 2365 patients over the past 10 years: in 165 patients with traumatic nasal deformity, in 350 patients with postrhinoplasty deformity, and in 1850 patients during primary rhinoplasty. The highlights of the surgical procedure include harvested cartilage (septal, alar, conchal, and sometimes costal) cut in pieces of 0.5 to 1 mm using a no. 11 blade. The fine-textured cartilage mass is then wrapped in one layer of Surgicel and moistened with an antibiotic (rifamycin). The graft is then molded into a cylindrical form and inserted under the dorsal nasal skin. In the lateral wall and tip of the nose, some overcorrection is performed depending on the type of deformity. When the mucosal stitching is complete, this graft can be externally molded, like plasticine, under the dorsal skin. In cases of mild-to-moderate nasal depression, septal and conchal cartilages are used in the same manner to augment the nasal dorsum with consistently effective and durable results. In cases with more severe defects of the nose, costal cartilage is necessary to correct both the length of the nose and the projection of the columella. In patients with recurrent deviation of the nasal bridge, this technique provided a simple solution to the problem. After overexcision of the dorsal part of deviated septal cartilage and insertion of Surgicel-wrapped diced cartilage, a straight nose was obtained in all patients with no recurrence (follow-up of 1 to 10 years). The technique also proved to be highly effective in primary rhinoplasties to camouflage bone irregularities after hump removal in patients with thin nasal skin and/or in cases when excessive hump removal was performed. As a complication, in six patients early postoperative swelling was more than usual. In 16 patients, overcorrection was persistent owing to fibrosis, and in 11 patients resorption was excessive beyond the expected amount. A histologic evaluation was possible in 16 patients, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, by removing thin slices of excess cartilage from the dorsum of the nose during touch-up surgery. This graft showed a mosaic-type alignment of graft cartilage with fibrous tissue connection among the fragments. In conclusion, this type of graft is very easy to apply, because a plasticine-like material is obtained that can be molded with the fingers, giving a smooth surface with desirable form and long-lasting results in all cases. The favorable results obtained by this technique have led the authors to use Surgicel-wrapped diced cartilage routinely in all types of rhinoplasty.     

Hispanic rhinoplasty in the United States,with emphasis on the Mexican American nose

Because an increasing number of Hispanic patients are seeking nasal surgical treatment, a critical analysis of 25 consecutive Hispanic rhinoplasties was performed. After a review of the patient data and preoperative photographs, a new classification was developed, based on the type of deformity rather than geographical origins (as previously used). A treatment paradigm is offered for each type of deformity. Type I involves a high radix, a high dorsum, and a nearly normal tip and is often referred to as a Castilian nose. Treatment consists of a closed functional reduction rhinoplasty, with dorsal reduction and minor tip changes. Type II involves a low radix, a normal dorsum, and a dependent tip and is a new designation. Treatment consists of a finesse rhinoplasty with a radix graft, minimal dorsal changes, use of a columellar strut for support, and open tip suturing. Type III involves a broad base, thick skin, and a wide tip deformity, with its worst expression in the mestizo nose. Treatment consists of a balanced rhinoplasty with minimal dorsal alteration but maximal lobular reduction and an open-structure tip graft. The following conclusions with respect to Hispanic rhinoplasty in the United States are important: (1) an enormous anatomical diversity of deformities is present, in contrast to Asian and black noses; (2) three distinct types of deformities have been identified, each of which requires a different surgical approach; (3) a wide variety of surgical techniques are necessary, in contrast to other ethnic noses; (4) conservative dorsal reduction is essential for type II and III noses; and (5) limitations imposed by the skin envelope are far less than presupposed, and the results are better than generally recognized. As the Hispanic population grows and becomes more prosperous, plastic surgeons in the United States can expect to encounter an increasing number of Hispanic patients requesting rhinoplasty.     

The subunit principle in nasal reconstruction

The nasal surface is made up of several concave and convex surfaces separated from one another by ridges and valleys. Gonzalez-Ulloa has designated the nose an aesthetic unit of the face. These smaller parts (tip, dorsum, sidewalls, alar lobules, and soft triangles) may be called topographic subunits. When a large part of a subunit has been lost, replacing the entire subunit rather than simply patching the defect often gives a superior result. This subunit approach to nasal reconstruction causes unsatisfactory border scars of flaps to mimic the normal shadowed valleys and lighted ridges of the nasal surface. Furthermore, as trapdoor contraction occurs, the entire reconstructed subunit bulges in a way that simulates the normal contour of a nasal tip, dorsal hump, or alar lobule. Photographs show five patients in whom this principle was followed and one in whom it was not.     

Refinements in extracorporal septoplasty

Septal deviations interfere with nasal airflow and contribute to deformities in the external appearance of the nose. An aesthetically and functionally satisfactory correction of severe septal deformities or "crippled" septal plates often requires a temporary intraoperative removal of the septal cartilage for appropriate remodeling. This article describes refinements to the previously described technique of extracorporal septoplasty; these refinements have proven useful and have made the procedure safer in the hands of less experienced surgeons. The refinements simplify the straightening methods for the explanted septal plate, achieving a stable and median fixation of the replanted septum while maintaining a satisfactory contour of the nasal dorsum. A milling cutter is used to straighten the irregularities of the explanted septal plate and to thin broadly based anterior nasal spines. When necessary, microplates are added to stabilize the osteotomized and medialized anterior nasal spine. The final positioning of the replanted septal plate is greatly enhanced by a rein stitch, transosseous sutures, and multiple quilt stitches. Additionally, direct fixation of the replanted septum to the edges of the upper lateral cartilages further improves the stability of the reconstruction. Finally, particular care should be taken to avoid residual irregularities of the nasal dorsum; it they occur, these irregularities can be covered with a thin cartilaginous splint or a layer of dehydrated fascia lata or autologous temporal fascia. A total of 436 patients who underwent rhinoseptoplasties at the authors' department during a 1-year period were reviewed. Of these patients, 108 presented with severe septal deviations and underwent an extracorporal septoplasty using the refined techniques described herein. Despite the complexity of the procedure, the patients' satisfaction rates were high, independent of the operating surgeon.     

Redefining the Septal L-Strut in Septal Surgery

In septal surgery, the surgeon preserves the L-strut, the portion anterior to a vertical line drawn from the rhinion to the anterior nasal spine (ANS) and at least a 1-cm width of the dorsal and caudal septal segment, to decrease the potential for loss of the tip and dorsal nasal support. However, nasal tip collapse and saddle deformities occur occasionally. We utilized a mechanical approach to determine the safe width size for the L-strut in contact with the maxillary crest. Five L-strut models were designed based on computed tomography data (80 patients) and previous studies (55 patients). All L-strut models connected the perpendicular plate of the ethmoid bone (PPE) and the maxillary crest and were assumed to be fixed to the PPE and maxillary crest. An approximated daily load was applied to the dorsal portion of the L-strut. Finite element analyses were performed to compare the stress, strain, and displacement distribution of all L-strut models. According to the differences in the contact area between the caudal L-strut and maxillary crest, there are significant differences in terms of the stress, strain, and displacement distribution in the L-strut. High stresses occurred at the inner corner of the L-strut when 60 - 100% of the strut was in contact with the maxillary crest. High stresses also occurred at the inferior portion of the caudal L-strut when 20 - 40% of the caudal strut was in contact with maxillary crest. We conclude that it is important to preserve the 1-cm width L-strut caudal segment, which corresponds to the portion posterior to a vertical line drawn from the rhinion to the ANS. In particular, we must maintain more than 40% of the contact area between the L-strut and the maxillary crest when the septal cartilage in the caudal portion of the L-strut is harvested.     

Component dorsal hump reduction: the importance of maintaining dorsal aesthetic lines in rhinoplasty

Dorsal hump reduction can create both functional and aesthetic problems if performed incorrectly. Component dorsal hump reduction allows a graduated approach to the correction of the nasal dorsum by emphasizing the integrity of the upper lateral cartilages when performing dorsal reduction. Use of this approach can minimize the need for spreader grafts in primary rhinoplasty patients. Possible untoward sequelae of dorsal hump reduction include long-term dorsal irregularities caused by uneven resection or overresection or underresection of the osseocartilaginous hump irregularity; the inverted-V deformity; and excessive narrowing of the midvault. The component dorsal hump reduction technique is a five-step method: (1) separation of the upper lateral cartilages from the septum, (2) incremental reduction of the septum proper, (3) dorsal bony reduction, (4) verification by palpation, and (5) final modifications (spreader grafts, suturing techniques, osteotomies). A graduated approach is described that offers control and precision at each interval. Fundamental to the final outcome is the protection and formation of strong dorsal aesthetic lines that define the appearance of the dorsum on frontal view. Furthermore, preservation of the transverse portions of the upper lateral cartilages is essential to maintain patency of the internal nasal valve, maintain the shape of the dorsal aesthetic lines, and avoid the inverted-V deformity. Finally, if needed, spreader grafts are enormously adaptable and can be customized for any deformity (unilateral or bilateral, visible or invisible) to handle functional or aesthetic problems.     

The role of septal surgery in management of the deviated nose

The deviated nose represents a complex cosmetic and functional problem. Septal surgery plays a central role in the successful management of the externally deviated nose. This study included 260 patients seeking rhinoplasty to correct external nasal deviations; 75 percent of them had various degrees of nasal obstruction. Septal surgery was necessary in 232 patients (89 percent), not only to improve breathing but also to achieve a straight, symmetrical, external nose as well. A graduated surgical approach was adopted to allow correction of the dorsal and caudal deviations of the nasal septum without weakening its structural support to the dorsum or nasal tip. The approach depended on full mobilization of deviated cartilage, followed by straightening of the cartilage and its fixation in the corrected position by using bony splinting grafts through an external rhinoplasty approach.     

Nasal support and lining: the marriage of beauty and blood supply

Assured of a robust blood supply by its narrow pedicle centered on the septal branch of the superior labial artery, the pivoting septal flap provides nasal support from the radix to the most distal nasal tip and from the tip to the columella base--plus a large bonus of lining tissues for the nasal vault and vestibules. Lining flaps from such intranasal tissues are thin, vascular, and flexible. They allow the use of primary cartilage grafts and the establishment of a subsurface architecture in the shape of a nose. When visualized through a conforming forehead flap, the normal landmarks and highlights are restored. In cases of total nasal amputation, a pivoting septal flap permits the fabrication of dorsal nasal support weeks before lining and cover flaps are assembled.     

AlloDerm for dorsal nasal irregularities

After nasal surgery, thinning of the nasal skin, bony irregularities, or adhesions of dorsal skin to underlying bone can all occur. These problems can be solved by using either alloplastic materials or various autogenous tissues. In this study, AlloDerm, a dermal replacement derived from cadaveric skin, has been used to cover the osseocartilaginous framework of the nose in an attempt to achieve a smooth contour and a natural feel in secondary rhinoplasties. Fifteen patients were treated and observed for a minimum of 24 months. Clinically palpable or visible bony irregularities were successfully covered, and adhesions of dorsal skin to nasal bones were diminished. Prolonged but not socially unacceptable dorsal nasal swelling, which resolved during the first 4 months, seemed to be the only problem related to its use. With this limited experience, AlloDerm was found to be useful in secondary nasal surgery to cover osseocartilaginous irregularities, to eliminate the adhesions between nasal bones and overlying skin, and to create a smooth nasal dorsum.     

Nasal reconstruction with a forehead flap in children younger than 10 years of age

Nasal reconstruction has been analyzed extensively in adults but not in children. The purpose of this article is to review the authors' experience with the forehead flap for nasal reconstruction in 10 children under the age of 10 during a 10-year period. Outcomes were assessed by an objective grading system for cosmetic surgical results. Subjective criteria were also applied by an assistant surgeon and by the patients' relatives. Appropriate results were obtained by the following principles: (1) A modified approach that considers three subunits consisting of the dorsum, tip, and ala was used; (2) a forehead flap is the best option for an entire subunit or a full-thickness defect repair; (3) the forehead flap design should be paramedian, oblique, and opposite to the major defect to avoid the hairline and allow better caudal advancement; (4) ear or costal cartilages are good options for structural support (the septum is a nasal growth center that should not be touched); (5) infundibular undermining of vestibular mucosa, turnover flaps, and skin grafts are good options for internal lining; (6) reconstruction is a three-stage procedure (an intermediate operation is added to thin the flap and perform secondary revisions for lining and support); (7) reconstruction should be completed before the child is school aged, to achieve good aesthetic results immediately and avoid psychosocial repercussions; and (8) the reconstructed nose, with skin, lining, and support, will grow with the child (no final surgery should be planned at the age of 18, other than revisions of late complications).     

An alternate strategy for reducing the large nasal base

The position of the dorsum directly influences the apparent size of the nasal base: the higher the bridge, the smaller the nasal base seems. This powerful optical illusion provides the surgeon with an alternate strategy for creating harmony in the nose with a low, straight dorsum and a disproportionately large nasal base. Instead of reducing the lower nose, the surgeon can augment the upper nose (and make whatever nasal base changes are independently necessary). This alternate strategy limits the amount of nasal skeletal reduction necessary, thereby limiting the potential for postoperative change and soft-tissue distortion and directly increasing the surgeon's control over the result.     

Distant effects of dorsal and tip grafting in rhinoplasty.

Grafts to the nasal dorsum and tip, whose local effects are well known, also have distant effects that may not be as readily obvious but that nevertheless are just as real. Dorsal and tip grafts can shorten or lengthen the nose (relatively and absolutely), affect nasal symmetry, preserve or alter nasal ethnic characteristics, and alter dorsum/tip relationships. Each of these properties increases the utility of cartilage and bone grafts in treating a variety of nasal configurations.     

Augmentation rhinoplasty: dorsal onlay grafting using shaped autogenous septal cartilage

We describe our experience with autogenous septal cartilage onlay grafts for augmentation of the nasal dorsum in primary and secondary rhinoplasty cases. After careful nasofacial analysis, the grafts are custom-shaped into inverted-V-frame, A-frame, or inverted-U-frame grafts, depending on the type and degree of augmentation desired. The dorsal elevation is thus tailored to fit the imperfection at hand, resulting in a smooth, natural-looking nasal contour. The indications for each type of graft are reviewed, and the surgical technique of graft harvesting and carving is detailed and illustrated.     

Rhinoplasty and endoscopic surgery for functional and inflammatory nasal/sinus disorders

The rhinoplastic surgeon when faced with nasal sinusitis has traditionally delayed aesthetic treatment of the nose, referring the patient to the ear, nose, and throat consultant until complete resolution of the inflammatory condition. Often, under such a scenario, the patient found the ear, nose, and throat procedure to be a traumatic experience that discouraged further surgery of an aesthetic nature. The advent of functional endoscopic sinus surgery has significantly modified the management of paranasal sinus disorders. This minimally invasive, sophisticated procedure can easily be combined with rhinoplasty. More recently, an endoscopic approach has been advocated for management of the septum and lower/middle turbinates. The authors call this functional endoscopic nasal surgery. Functional endoscopic nasal surgery allows a clearer view of the operative field (septum and turbinates), a more accurate correction of nasal obstruction, and better control of bleeding. Thus, endoscopic techniques permit the treatment of functional and inflammatory nasal disorders in a single stage, along with aesthetic improvement. Only the patient with severe sinusitis is unsuitable for combined therapy. The authors present their experience based on 72 consecutive cases of combined functional endoscopic sinus surgery/functional endoscopic nasal surgery with aesthetic rhinoplasty. Complications were minimal and functional failures were limited to 4 percent, whereas aesthetic outcomes remained uncompromised.