Molecular modeling of human MT2 melatonin receptor: the role of Val204, Leu272 and Tyr298 in ligand binding

A model of the helical part of the human MT2 melatonin (hMT2) receptor, a member of the G protein-coupled receptors superfamily has been generated, based on the structure of bovine rhodopsin. Modeling has been combined with site-directed mutagenesis to investigate the role of the specific amino acid residues within the transmembrane domains (TM) numbers V, VI and VII of hMT2 receptor in the interaction with 2-iodomelatonin. Saturation binding assays with 2-iodomelatonin demonstrated that the substitution V204A (TMV) resulted in total loss of binding while the mutation V205A had no effect. The replacement of F209 with alanine led to a significant decrease in the Bmax value of receptor binding while mutations V205A and F209A also within TM V did not significantly change binding properties of the hMT2 receptor. In the case of TM VI, the substitution G271T caused substantial decrease in 2-iodomelatonin binding to the hMT2 receptor. The change L272A (TM VI) as well as mutation Y298A within TM VII completely abolished ligand binding to the receptor. These data suggest that several new amino acid residues within TM V, VI and VII are involved in ligand-MT2 receptor interaction.     

Use of Cysteine Trapping to Map Spatial Approximations between Residues Contributing to the Helix N-capping Motif of Secretin and Distinct Residues within Each of the Extracellular Loops of Its Receptor

Amino-terminal regions of secretin-family peptides contain key determinants for biological activity and binding specificity, although the nature of interactions with receptors is unclear. A helix N-capping motif within this region has been postulated to directly contribute to agonist activity while also stabilizing formation of a helix extending toward the peptide carboxyl terminus and docking within the receptor amino terminus. We used cysteine trapping to systematically explore spatial approximations between cysteines replacing each residue in this motif of secretin (sec), Phe⁶, Thr⁷, and Leu¹⁰, and cysteines incorporated into the extracellular face of the receptor. Each peptide was a full agonist for cAMP, but had a lower binding affinity than natural hormone. These bound to COS cells expressing 61 receptor constructs incorporating cysteines in every position along each extracellular loop (ECL) and adjacent parts of transmembrane (TM) segments. Patterns of covalent labeling were distinct for each probe, with Cys⁶-sec labeling multiple residues in the carboxyl-terminal half of ECL2 and throughout ECL3, Cys⁷-sec predominantly labeling only single residues in the carboxyl-terminal end of ECL2 and the amino-terminal end of ECL3, and Cys¹⁰-sec not efficiently labeling any of these residues. These spatial constraints were used to refine our model of secretin bound to its receptor, now bringing ECL3 above the amino terminus of the ligand and revealing possible charge-charge interactions between this part of secretin and receptor residues in TM5, TM6, ECL2, and ECL3, which can orient and stabilize the peptide-receptor complex. This was validated by testing predicted approximations by mutagenesis and residue-residue complementation studies.     

Interactions of the Melanocortin-4 Receptor with the Peptide Agonist NDP-MSH

Melanocortin-4 receptor (MC4R) has an important regulatory role in energy homeostasis and food intake. Peptide agonists of the MC4R are characterized by the conserved sequence His₆-Phe₇-Arg₈-Trp₉, which is crucial for their interaction with the receptor. This investigation utilized the covalent attachment approach to identify receptor residues in close proximity to the bound ligand [Nle₄,d-Phe₇]melanocyte-stimulating hormone (NDP-MSH), thereby differentiating between residues directly involved in ligand binding and those mutations that compromise ligand binding by inducing conformational changes in the receptor. Also, recent X-ray structures of G-protein-coupled receptors were utilized to refine a model of human MC4R in the active state (R^?), which was used to generate a better understanding of the binding mode of the ligand NDP-MSH at the atomic level.The mutation of residues in the human MC4R—such as Leu106 of extracellular loop 1, and Asp122, Ile125, and Asp126 of transmembrane (TM) helix 3, His264 (TM6), and Met292 (TM7)—to Cys residues produced definitive indications of proximity to the side chains of residues in the core region of the peptide ligand. Of particular interest was the contact between d-Phe₇ on the ligand and Ile125 of TM3 on the MC4R. Additionally, Met292 (TM7) equivalent to Lys(7.45) (Ballesteros numbering scheme) involved in covalently attaching retinal in rhodopsin is shown to be in close proximity to Trp₉.For the first time, the interactions between the terminal regions of NDP-MSH and the receptor are described. The amino-terminus appears to be adjacent to a series of hydrophilic residues with novel interactions at Cys196 (TM5) and Asp189 (extracellular loop 2). These interactions are reminiscent of sequential ligand binding exhibited by the β₂-adrenergic receptor, with the former interaction being equivalent to the known interaction involving Ser204 of the β₂-adrenergic receptor.     

Vasopressin V2 Receptor/Bioligand Interactions

We predict some essential interactions between the V2 vasopressin renal receptor (V2R) and its agonists [Arg⁸]vasopressin (AVP) and [D-Arg⁸]vasopressin (DAVP), and the non-peptide antagonist OPC-31260. V2R controls antidiuresis and belongs to the superfamily of heptahelical transmembrane (7TM) G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). The receptor was built, the ligands were docked and the structures relaxed using advanced molecular modeling techniques. Docked agonists and antagonists appear to prefer similar V2R compartments. A number of receptor amino acid residues are indicated, mainly in the TM3–TM7 helices, as potentially important in ligand binding. Many of these residues are invariant for either the GPCR superfamily or the subfamily of related (vasopressin V2R, V1aR and V1bR and oxytocin OR) receptors. Moreover, some of the equivalent residues in V1aR have already been found critical for ligand affinity [Mouillac et al., J. Biol. Chem., 270 (1995) 25771].     

Identification of the binding pocket for the TRH peptide in the melanocortin 1 receptor

Summary We found recently that thyrotropin-relasing hormone (TRH) acts as a selective agonist on the melanocortin MC₁ receptor. While the TRH was capable of fully activating the MC₁ receptor, it did not interact with any of the other MSH peptide binding G-protein coupled melanocortin receptor subtypes MC_3–5. The MC₁ receptor is a promising target for the development of anti-inflammatory and immuno-modulatory drugs, and it was of wide interest to explore the binding site of the TRH in this receptor. Here we have investigated the binding of TRH to MC₁/MC₃ chimeric receptors and used a partial least squares (PLS) modelling approach for the data evaluation. Statistically valid PLS models (R²=0.80; Q²=0.66) were obtained explaining the contribution of the amino acid sequence parts of the receptor chimeras for the binding of TRH. By using the variable importances in the projection (VIPs) deduced from the PLS-model, it was revealed that the trnsmembrane (TM) regions TM1 and TM2/TM3 contribute the most to the TRH binding. The TM6/TM7 also had a significant influence on the binding. Moreover, it was revealed that an interaction between TM1 and TM6/TM7 of the receptor contributed to the binding of TRH. The data are in full agreement with a 3D model of a TRH peptide and MC₁ receptor complex and validates the location of the TRH ligand binding pocket between the TM1, TM2 and TM7 of the receptor.     

Identification of the binding pocket for the TRH peptide in the melanocortin 1 receptor

We found recently that thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) acts as a selective agonist on the melanocortin MC₁ receptor. While the TRH was capable of fully activating the MC₁ receptor, it did not interact with any of the other MSH peptide binding G-protein coupled melanocortin receptor subtypes MC_3-5. The MC₁ receptor is a promising target for the development of anti-inflammatory and immuno-modulatory drugs, and it was of wide interest to explore the binding site of the TRH in this receptor. Here we have investigated the binding of TRH to MC₁/MC₃ chimeric receptors and used a partial least squares (PLS) modelling approach for the data evaluation. Statistically valid PLS models (R² = 0.80; Q² = 0.66) were obtained explaining the contribution of the amino acid sequence parts of the receptor chimeras for the binding of TRH. By using the variable importances in the projection (VIPs) deduced from the PLS-model, it was revealed that the transmembrane (TM) regions TM1 and TM2/TM3 contribute the most to the TRH binding. The TM6/TM7 also had a significant influence on the binding. Moreover, it was revealed that an interaction between TM1 and TM6/TM7 of the receptor contributed to the binding of TRH. The data are in full agreement with a 3D model of a TRH peptide and MC₁ receptor complex and validates the location of the TRH ligand binding pocket between the TM1, TM2 and TM7 of the receptor.     

Molecular modeling of the oxytocin receptor/bioligand interactions

Oxytocin is a nonapeptide hormone (CYIQNCPLG-NH2, OT), controlling labor and lactation in mammalian females, via interactions with specific cellular membrane receptors (OTRs). The native hormone is cyclized via a 1-6 disulfide and its receptor belongs to the GTP-binding (G) protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) family, also known as heptahelical transmembrane (7TM) or serpentine receptors. Using a technique combining multiple sequence alignments with available experimental constraints, a reliable OTR model was built. Subsequently, the OTR complexes with a selective agonist [Thr4,Gly7]OT, a selective cyclohexapeptide antagonist L-366,948 and oxytocin itself were modeled and relaxed using a constrained simulated annealing (CSA) protocol. All three ligands seem to prefer similar modes of binding to the receptor, manifested by repeating receptor residues which directly interact with the ligands. Those involved in the three complexes are putative helices: TM3: R113, K116, Q119, M123; TM4: Q171, and TM5: I201 and T205. Most of them are the equivalent residues/positions to those found in our earlier studies, regarding related vasopressin V2 receptor/bioligand interactions.     

Vasopressin V2 Receptor/Bioligand Interactions

Summary We predict some essential interactions between the V2 vasopressin renal receptor (V2R) and its agonists [Arg⁸]vasopressin (AVP) and [D-Arg⁸]vasopressin (DAVP), and the non-peptide antagonist OPC-31260. V2R controls antidiuresis and belongs to the superfamily of heptahelical transmembrane (7TM) G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). The receptor was built, the ligands were docked and the structures relaxed using advanced molecular modeling techniques. Docked agonists and antagonists appear to prefer similar V2R compartments. A number of receptor amino acid residues are indicated, mainly in the TM3-TM7 helices, as potentially important in ligand binding. Many of these residues are invariant for either the GPCR superfamily or the subfamily of related (vasopressin V2R, V1aR and V1bR and oxytocin OR) receptors. Moreover, some of the equivalent residues in V1aR have already been found critical for ligand affinity [Mouillac et al., J. Biol. Chem., 270 (1995) 25771].     

Preliminary mutational analysis of the human kinin B2 receptor for nonpeptide antagonist ligands recognition

FR173657, LF16,0335, and LF16,0687 are nonpeptide antagonists, endowed with high affinity and selectivity for the human kinin B2 receptor. The kinin B2 receptor belongs to the family of G-protein-coupled receptors with seven transmembrane (TM) helices. In the present study, we aimed, through computer-assisted modeling and mutagenesis, to identify residues in the human B2 receptor (hB2R) amino acid sequence that are involved in nonpeptide antagonist binding in order to build up experimental data as a first step towards a molecular model of nonpeptide ligands binding site. Fourteen amino acid residues within the TM segments were mutated to alanine. The wild type and mutant receptors were stably expressed in Chinese hamster ovary (dhfr-) cells and tested for their ability to bind agonist ([3H]bradykinin) and peptide antagonist ([3H]MENI 1270) radioligands. The affinity of nonpeptide ligands was determined by heterologous competition experiments using the above radioligands. We found that some mutations in TM2 (W86A) and TM7 (Y295A, N297A) impair the binding affinity of the three nonpeptide antagonists. On the other hand, some mutated residues in TM3 (S1 17A) and TM6 (W256A) reduce the affinity of LF16,0335 and LF16,0687 only. Results are discussed in order to build up a hypothesis for the likely different interactions of various nonpeptide ligands with the B2 receptor.     

Comparison of the amino acid residues in the sixth transmembrane domains accessible in the binding-site crevices of mu, delta, and kappa opioid receptors.

We have mapped the residues in the sixth transmembrane domains (TMs 6) of the mu, delta, and kappa opioid receptors that are accessible in the binding-site crevices by the substituted cysteine accessibility method (SCAM). We previously showed that ligand binding to the C7.38S mutants of the mu and kappa receptors and the wild-type delta receptor was relatively insensitive to methanethiosulfonate ethylammonium (MTSEA), a positively charged sulfhydryl-specific reagent. These MTSEA-insensitive constructs were used as the templates, and 22 consecutive residues in TM6 (excluding C6.47) of each receptor were mutated to cysteine, 1 at a time. Most mutants retained binding affinities for [3H]diprenorphine, a nonselective opioid antagonist, similar to that of the template receptors. Treatment with MTSEA significantly inhibited [3H]diprenorphine binding to 11 of 22 mutants of the rat mu receptor and 9 of 22 mutants of the human delta receptor and 10 of 22 mutants of the human kappa receptor. Naloxone or diprenorphine protected all sensitive mutants, except the A6.42(287)C mu mutant. Thus, V6.40, F6.44, W6.48, I6.51, Y6.54, V6.55, I6.56, I6.57, K6.58, and A6.59 of the mu receptor; F6.44, I6.51, F6.54, V6.55, I6.56, V6.57, W6.58, T6.59, and L6.60 of the delta receptor; and F6.44, W6.48, I6.51, F6.54, I6.55, L6.56, V6.57, E6.58, A6.59, and L6.60 of the kappa receptor are on the water-accessible surface of the binding-site crevices. The accessibility patterns of residues in the TMs 6 of the mu, delta, and kappa opioid receptors are consistent with the notion that the TMs 6 are in alpha-helical conformations with a narrow strip of accessibility on the intracellular side of 6.54 and a wider area of accessibility on the extracellular side of 6.54, likely due to a proline kink at 6.50 that bends the helix in toward the binding pocket and enables considerable motion in this region. The wider exposure of residues 6.55-6.60 to the binding-site crevice, combined with the divergent amino acid sequences, is consistent with the inferred role of residues in this region in determining ligand binding selectivity. The conservation of the accessibility pattern on the cytoplasmic side of 6.54 suggests that this region may be important for receptor activation. This accessibility pattern is similar to that of the D2 dopamine receptor, the only other GPCR in which TM6 has been mapped by SCAM. That opioid receptors and the remotely related D2 dopamine receptor have similar accessibility patterns in TM6 suggest that these segments of GPCRs in the rhodopsin-like subfamily not only share secondary structure but also are packed similarly into the transmembrane bundle and thus have similar tertiary structure.     

Extracellular loops 1 and 3 and their associated transmembrane regions of the calcitonin receptor-like receptor are needed for CGRP receptor function

The first and third extracellular loops (ECL) of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have been implicated in ligand binding and receptor function. This study describes the results of an alanine/leucine scan of ECLs 1 and 3 and loop-associated transmembrane (TM) domains of the secretin-like GPCR calcitonin receptor-like receptor which associates with receptor activity modifying protein 1 to form the CGRP receptor. Leu195Ala, Val198Ala and Ala199Leu at the top of TM2 all reduced αCGRP-mediated cAMP production and internalization; Leu195Ala and Ala199Leu also reduced αCGRP binding. These residues form a hydrophobic cluster within an area defined as the “minor groove” of rhodopsin-like GPCRs. Within ECL1, Ala203Leu and Ala206Leu influenced the ability of αCGRP to stimulate adenylate cyclase. In TM3, His219Ala, Leu220Ala and Leu222Ala have influences on αCGRP binding and cAMP production; they are likely to indirectly influence the binding site for αCGRP as well as having an involvement in signal transduction. On the exofacial surfaces of TMs 6 and 7, a number of residues were identified that reduced cell surface receptor expression, most noticeably Leu351Ala and Glu357Ala in TM6. The residues may contribute to the RAMP1 binding interface. Ile360Ala impaired αCGRP-mediated cAMP production. Ile360 is predicted to be located close to ECL2 and may facilitate receptor activation. Identification of several crucial functional loci gives further insight into the activation mechanism of this complex receptor system and may aid rational drug design.     

Constitutive activation of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor alters the spatial proximity of transmembrane 7 to the ligand-binding pocket

Activation of G protein-coupled receptors by agonists involves significant movement of transmembrane domains (TM) following binding of agonist. The underlying structural mechanism by which receptor activation takes place is largely unknown but can be inferred by detecting variability within the environment of the ligand-binding pocket, which constitutes a water-accessible crevice surrounded by the seven TM helices. Using the substituted cysteine accessibility method, we initially identified those residues within the seventh transmembrane domain (TM7) of wild type angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor that contribute to forming the binding site pocket. We have substituted successively TM7 residues ranging from Ile276 to Tyr302 to cysteine. Treatment of A277C, V280C, T282C, A283C, I286C, A291C, and F301C mutant receptors with the charged sulfhydryl-specific alkylating agent MTSEA significantly inhibited ligand binding, which suggests that these residues orient themselves within the water-accessible binding pocket of the AT1 receptor. Interestingly, this pattern of acquired MTSEA sensitivity was greatly reduced for TM7 reporter cysteines engineered in a constitutively active mutant of the AT1 receptor. Our data suggest that upon activation, TM7 of the AT1 receptor goes through a pattern of helical movements that results in its distancing from the binding pocket per se. These studies support accumulating evidence whereby elements of TM7 of class A GPCRs promote activation of the receptor through structural rearrangements.     

High affinity agonistic metal ion binding sites within the melanocortin 4 receptor illustrate conformational change of transmembrane region 3

We created a molecular model of the human melanocortin 4 receptor (MC4R) and introduced a series of His residues into the receptor protein to form metal ion binding sites. We were able to insert micromolar affinity binding sites for zinc between transmembrane region (TM) 2 and TM3 where the metal ion alone was able to activate this peptide binding G-protein-coupled receptor. The exact conformation of the metal ion interactions allowed us to predict the orientation of the helices, and remodeling of the receptor protein indicated that Glu100 and Ile104 in TM2 and Asp122 and Ile125 in TM3 are directed toward a putative area of activation of the receptor. The molecular model suggests that a rotation of TM3 may be important for activation of the MC4R. Previous models of G-protein-coupled receptors have suggested that unlocking of a stabilizing interaction between the DRY motif, in the cytosolic part of TM3, and TM6 is important for the activation process. We suggest that this unlocking process may be facilitated through creation of a new interaction between TM3 and TM2 in the MC4R.     

Molecular modeling of the dopamine D2 and serotonin 5-HT1A receptor binding modes of the enantiomers of 5-OMe-BPAT.

Molecular modeling studies were undertaken in order to elucidate the possible dopamine D2 and serotonin 5-HT1A receptor binding modes of the enantiomers of 5-methoxy-2-[N-(2-benzamidoethyl)-N-n-propylamino]tetralin (5-OMe-BPAT, 1). For this purpose, a combination of indirect molecular modeling and direct construction of the seven transmembrane (7TM) domains of the receptors was employed in a stepwise, objective manner. Pharmacophore models and corresponding receptor maps were identified by superimposing selected sets of receptor agonists in their presumed pharmacologically active conformations, while taking the conformational freedom of the ligands into account. The 7TM models were then constructed around the agonist pharmacophore models, by adding the TM domains one-by-one. Initially, the relative positions of TM3, TM4, and TM5 were determined using the three-dimensional structure of bacteriorhodopsin, but subsequently the orientations of all TM domains were adjusted in order to mimic the topology of the TM domains of rhodopsin. The presumed dopamine D2 receptor binding conformations of (S)- and (R)-1 were determined by using the semirigid dopamine D2 receptor antagonist N-benzylpiquindone as a template for superposition. Similarly, the selective serotonin 5-HT1A receptor agonist flesinoxan was employed for identifying the serotonin 5-HT1A receptor binding conformations of the enantiomers of 1. After docking of the presumed pharmacologically active conformations in the 7TM models and subsequent optimization of the binding sites, specific interactions between the ligands and the surrounding amino acid residues, consistent with the structure-activity relationships, were observed. Thus, both enantiomers of 1 bound to the dopamine D2 receptor model in a similar fashion: a reinforced electrostatic interaction was present between the protonated nitrogen atoms and Asp114 in TM3; their carbonyl groups accepted a H-bond from Ser121 in TM3; their amide NH groups acted as H-bond donor to Tyr416 in TM7; and their benzamide phenyl rings were involved in a hydrophobic edge-to-face interaction with Trp386 in TM6. Differences were observed in the orientations of the 2-aminotetralin moieties, which occupied the agonist binding site. Whereas the (S)-enantiomer could form a H-bond between its 5-methoxy substituent and Ser193 in TM5, the (R)-enantiomer could not, which may account for the differences in their intrinsic efficacies at the dopamine D2 receptor. In the serotonin 5-HT1A receptor model, the benzamide phenyl rings of both enantiomers were involved in hydrophobic face-to-face interactions with Phe112 in TM3, while their protonated nitrogen atoms formed a reinforced electrostatic interaction with Asp116 in TM3. Consistent with the structure-affinity relationships of 1, the amide moieties were not involved in specific interactions. Both enantiomers of 1 could form a hydrogen bond between their 5-methoxy substituent and Thr200 in TM5, which may account for their full serotonin 5-HT1A receptor agonist properties.     

Binding modes of dihydroquinoxalinones in a homology model of bradykinin receptor 1

We report the first homology model of human bradykinin receptor B1 generated from the crystal structure of bovine rhodopsin as a template. Using an automated docking procedure, two B1 receptor antagonists of the dihydroquinoxalinone structural class were docked into the receptor model. Site-directed mutagenesis data of the amino acid residues in TM1, TM3, TM6, and TM7 were incorporated to place the compounds in the binding site of the homology model of the human B1 bradykinin receptor. The best pose in agreement with the mutation data was selected for detailed study of the receptor-antagonist interaction. To test the model, the calculated antagonist-receptor binding energy was correlated with the experimentally measured binding affinity (K(i)) for nine dihydroquinoxalinone analogs. The model was used to gain insight into the molecular mechanism for receptor function and to optimize the dihydroquinoxalinone analogs.     

Conformational Clamping by a Membrane Ligand Activates the EphA2 Receptor

The EphA2 receptor is a promising drug target for cancer treatment, since EphA2 activation can inhibit metastasis and tumor progression. It has been recently described that the TYPE7 peptide activates EphA2 using a novel mechanism that involves binding to the single transmembrane domain of the receptor. TYPE7 is a conditional transmembrane (TM) ligand, which only inserts into membranes at neutral pH in the presence of the TM region of EphA2. However, how membrane interactions can activate EphA2 is not known. We systematically altered the sequence of TYPE7 to identify the binding motif used to activate EphA2. With the resulting six peptides, we performed biophysical and cell migration assays that identified a new potent peptide variant. We also performed a mutational screen that determined the helical interface that mediates dimerization of the TM domain of EphA2 in cells. These results, together with molecular dynamic simulations, allowed to elucidate the molecular mechanism that TYPE7 uses to activate EphA2, where the membrane peptide acts as a molecular clamp that wraps around the TM dimer of the receptor. We propose that this binding mode stabilizes the active conformation of EphA2. Our data, additionally, provide clues into the properties that TM ligands need to have in order to achieve activation of membrane receptors.     

Asn229 in the third helix of VPAC1 receptor is essential for receptor activation but not for receptor phosphorylation and internalization: comparison with Asn216 in VPAC2 receptor

After stimulation with agonist, G protein coupled receptors (GPCR) undergo conformational changes that allow activation of G proteins to transduce the signal, followed by phosphorylation by kinases and arrestin binding to promote receptor internalization. Actual paradigm, based on a study of GPCR-A/rhodopsin family, suggests that a network of interactions between conserved residues located in transmembrane (TM) domains (mainly TM3, TM6 and TM7) is involved in the molecular switch leading to GPCR activation.

We evaluated in CHO cells expressing the VPAC₁ receptor the role of the third transmembrane helix in agonist signalling by point mutation into Ala of the residues highly conserved in the secretin-family of receptors: Y²²⁴, N²²⁹, F²³⁰, W²³², E²³⁶, G²³⁷, Y²³⁹, L²⁴⁰. N²²⁹A VPAC₁ mutant was characterized by a decrease in both potency and efficacy of VIP stimulated adenylate cyclase activity, by the absence of agonist stimulated [Ca²⁺]_i increase, by a preserved receptor recognition of agonists and antagonist and by a preserved sensitivity to GTP suggesting the importance of that residue for efficient G protein activation. N²²⁹D mutant was not expressed at the membrane, and the N²²⁹Q with a conserved mutation was less affected than the A mutant. Agonist stimulated phosphorylation and internalization of N²²⁹A and N²²⁹Q VPAC₁ were unaffected. However, the re-expression of internalized mutant receptors, but not that of the wild type receptor, was rapidly reversed after VIP washing. Receptor phosphorylation, internalization and re-expression may be thus dissociated from G protein activation and linked to another active conformation that may influence its trafficking.

Mutation of that conserved amino acid in VPAC₂ could be investigated only by a conservative mutation (N²¹⁶Q) and led to a receptor with a low VIP stimulation of adenylate cyclase, receptor phosphorylation and internalization. This indicated the importance of the conserved N residue in the TM3 of that family of receptors.     

Molecular characterization of the ligand binding site of the human galanin receptor type 2, identifying subtype selective interactions

To define the specific role of the galanin receptors when mediating the effect of galanin, effective tools for distinct activation and inhibition of the different receptor subtypes are required. Several of the physiological effects modulated by galanin are implicated to be mediated via the GalR2 subtype and have been distinguished from GalR1 effects by utilizing the Gal(2–11) peptide, recognizing only GalR2 and GalR3. In this study, we have performed a mutagenesis approach on the GalR2 subtype and present, for the first time, a molecular characterization of the interactions responsible for ligand binding and receptor activation at this receptor subtype. Our results identify four residues, His²⁵² and His²⁵³ located in transmembrane domain 6 and Phe²⁶⁴ and Tyr²⁷¹ in the extracellular loop 3, to be of great significance. We show evidence for the N-terminal tail of GalR2 to participate in ligand binding and that selective binding of Gal(2–11) includes interaction with the Ile²⁵⁶ residue, located at the very top of TM 6. In conclusion, we present a mutagenesis study on GalR2 and confer interactions responsible for ligand binding and receptor activation as well as selective recognition of the Gal(2–11) peptide at this receptor subtype. The presented observations could be of major importance for the design and development of new and improved peptide and non-peptide ligands, selectively activating the GalR2 subtype.     

Flow cytometric analysis of the calcitonin receptor-like receptor domains responsible for cell-surface translocation of receptor activity-modifying proteins

The three receptor activity-modifying proteins (RAMPs1, -2, and -3) associate with a wide variety of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), including calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CRLR). In this study, we used flow cytometry to measure RAMP translocation to the cell surface as a marker of RAMP-receptor interaction. Because VPAC2 does not interact with RAMPs, although, like CRLR, it is a Family B peptide hormone receptor, we constructed a set of chimeric CRLR/VPAC2 receptors to evaluate the trafficking interactions between CRLR domains and each RAMP. We found that CRLR regions extending from transmembrane domain 1 (TM1) through TM5 are necessary and sufficient for the transport of RAMPs to the plasma membrane. In addition, the extracellular N-terminal domain of CRLR, its 3rd intracellular loop and/or TM6 were also important for the cell-surface translocation of RAMP2, but not RAMP1 or RAMP3. Other regions within CRLR were not involved in trafficking interactions with RAMPs. These findings provide new insight into the trafficking interactions between accessory proteins such as RAMPs and their receptor partners.