The alpha v beta 1 integrin functions as a fibronectin receptor but does not support fibronectin matrix assembly and cell migration on fibronectin

The fibronectin receptor, alpha 5 beta 1, has been shown to be required for fibronectin matrix assembly and plays an important role in cell migration on fibronectin. However, it is not clear whether other fibronectin binding integrins can take the place of alpha 5 beta 1 during matrix assembly and cell migration. To test this, we expressed the human alpha v subunit in the CHO cell line CHO-B2 that lacks the alpha 5 subunit. We found that the human alpha v combined with CHO cell beta 1 to form the integrin alpha v beta 1. Cells that expressed alpha v beta 1 attached to and spread well on fibronectin-coated dishes, but did so less well on vitronectin-coated dishes. This, along with other data, indicated that alpha v beta 1 functions as a fibronectin receptor in CHO-B2 cells. The alpha v beta 1-expressing cells failed to produce a fibronectin matrix or to migrate on fibronectin, although the same cells transfected with alpha 5 do produce a matrix and migrate on fibronectin. The affinity of the alpha v beta 1-expressing cells for fibronectin was fourfold lower than that of the alpha 5 beta 1- expressing cells. In addition, alpha v beta 1 was distributed diffusely throughout the cell surface, whereas alpha 5 beta 1 was localized to focal adhesions when cells were seeded onto fibronectin-coated surfaces. Thus, of the two fibronectin receptors, alpha v beta 1 and alpha 5 beta 1, only alpha 5 beta 1 supports fibronectin matrix assembly and promotes cell migration on fibronectin in the CHO-B2 cells. Possible reasons for this difference in the activities of alpha v beta 1 and alpha 5 beta 1 include the lower affinity of alpha v beta 1 for fibronectin and the failure of this integrin to localize in adhesion plaques on a fibronectin substrate. These results show that two integrins with similar ligand specificities and cell attachment functions may be quite different in their ability to support fibronectin matrix assembly and cell motility on fibronectin.     

Different integrins mediate cell spreading,haptotaxis and lateral migration of HaCaT keratinocytes on fibronectin

Collaborative role of various fibronectin-binding integrins (α5β1, αvβ1 and αvβ6) as mediators of cell adhesion and migration on fibronectin was studied using cultured HaCaT keratinocytes. This cell line spontaneously expressed all three fibronectin-binding integrins. In addition, the expression of αvβ6 integrin was strongly and specifically upregulated by transforming growth factor-β1 (TGFβ1) whereas the amount of other integrins remained practically unchanged on the cell surface. Adhesion, spreading and motility of HaCaT keratinocytes on fibronectin were promoted by TGFβ1. Based on antibody blocking experiments, both untreated and TGFβ1-treated HaCaT cells used αvβ6 integrin as their main fibronectin receptor for cell spreading. In contrast to TGFβ1-treated cells, the untreated cells also needed α5β1 integrin for maximal cell spreading on fibronectin. Combinations of antibodies blocking both of these receptors totally prevented spreading of both untreated and TGFβ1-treated cells. Haptotactic motility of individual HaCaT cells through fibronectin-coated membranes was again mainly dependent on αvβ6 integrin, while αvβ1 and α5β1 integrins played a lesser role both in untreated and TGFβ1-treated HaCaT cells. However, unlike haptotaxis, lateral migration of HaCaT cell sheet was mainly mediated by β1 integrins, and αvβ6 integrin showed a minor role. The migration process appeared to involve a number of β1 integrins that could adaptively replace each other when blocking antibodies were present. Thus, keratinocytes appear to use different fibronectin receptors for different functions, such as cell spreading, haptotaxis and lateral migration. The cells can also adapt to a situation where one receptor is unfunctional by switching to another receptor of the same ligand.     

Endothelial cell migration on fibronectin is regulated by syntaxin 6-mediated alpha5beta1 integrin recycling

The α5β1 integrin heterodimer regulates many processes that contribute to embryonic development and angiogenesis, in both physiological and pathological contexts. As one of the major adhesion complexes on endothelial cells, it plays a vital role in adhesion and migration along the extracellular matrix. We recently showed that angiogenesis is modulated by syntaxin 6, a Golgi- and endosome-localized t-SNARE, and that it does so by regulating the post-Golgi trafficking of VEGFR2. Here we show that syntaxin 6 is also required for α5β1 integrin-mediated adhesion of endothelial cells to, and migration along, fibronectin. We demonstrate that syntaxin 6 and α5β1 integrin colocalize in EEA1-containing early endosomes, and that functional inhibition of syntaxin 6 leads to misrouting of β1 integrin to the degradation pathway (late endosomes and lysosomes) rather transport along recycling pathway from early endosomes; an increase in the pool of ubiquitinylated α5 integrin and its lysosome-dependent degradation; reduced cell spreading on fibronectin; decreased Rac1 activation; and altered Rac1 localization. Collectively, our data show that functional syntaxin 6 is required for the regulation of α5β1-mediated endothelial cell movement on fibronectin. These syntaxin 6-regulated membrane trafficking events control outside-in signaling via haptotactic and chemotactic mechanisms.     

Localization of Urokinase Type Plasminogen Activator to Focal Adhesions Requires Ligation of Vitronectin Integrin Receptors

Previous studies have shown that the adhesion protein, vitronectin, directs the localization of urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) to areas of cell-substrate adhesion, where uPA is thought to regulate cell migration as well as pericellular proteolysis. In the present study, HT-1080 cell lines expressing either wild-type vitronectin or vitronectin containing a single amino-acid substitution in the integrin binding domain were used to assess whether ligation of the α_vβT₅ integrin was required for uPA localization to focal adhesions. The synthesis of wild-type vitronectin by HT-1080 cells adherent to either collagen or fibronectin resulted in the redistribution of both the α_vβT₅ integrin as well as uPA to focal adhesion structures. In contrast, cells synthesizing mutant vitronectin, containing the amino-acid substitution in the integrin binding domain, were unable to direct the redistribution of either α_vβT₅ or uPA to focal adhesions. Recombinant forms of wild-type and mutant vitronectin were prepared in a baculovirus system and compared for their ability to direct the redistribution of vitronectin integrin receptors as well as uPA on human skin fibroblasts. In the absence of vitronectin, fibroblast cells adherent to fibronectin assemble focal adhesions which contain the βT₁ integrin but do not contain uPA. Addition of recombinant wild-type, but not mutant, vitronectin to fibroblasts adherent to fibronectin resulted in the redistribution of α_vβT₃, α_vβT₅, and uPA into focal adhesions. However, when cells were plated directly onto antibodies directed against either the α_vβT₃ or α_vβT₅ integrins, uPA was not localized on the cell surface. These data indicate that ligation of vitronectin integrin receptors is necessary but not sufficient for the localization of uPA to areas of cell-matrix adhesion, and suggest that vitronectin may promote cell migration by recruiting vitronectin integrin receptors and components of the plasminogen activator system to areas of cell matrix contact.     

α9β1 Integrin in melanoma cells can signal different adhesion states for migration and anchorage

Cell surface integrins are the primary receptors for cell migration on extracellular matrix, and exist in several activation states regulated in part by ectodomain conformation. The α9 integrin subunit, which pairs only with β1, has specific roles in the immune system and may regulate cell migration. Melanoma cells express abundant α9β1 integrin, and its role in cell migration was assessed. Ligands derived from Tenascin-C and ADAM12 supported α9β1 integrin-mediated cell attachment and GTP-Rac dependent migration, but not focal adhesion formation. Manganese ions induced α9β1 integrin- and Rho kinase-dependent focal adhesion and stress fibre formation, suggesting that the activation status of α9β1 integrin was altered. The effect of manganese ions in promoting focal adhesion formation was reproduced by β1 integrin activating antibody. The α9β1 integrin translocated to focal adhesions, where active β1 integrin was also detected by conformation-specific antibodies. Focal adhesion assembly was commensurate with reduced cell migration. Endogenous α9β1 integrin-mediated adhesion was sensitive to the PP1 chemical inhibitor and an inhibitor of endosomal vesicle recycling, but not inhibitors of protein kinase C or the small GTPase Rho. Our results demonstrated that although α9β1 integrin can induce and localise to focal adhesions in a high activation state, its intermediate activity state normally supports cell adhesion consistent with migration.     

CCN6 enhances ICAM-1 expression and cell motility in human chondrosarcoma cells

Chondrosarcoma is a type of highly malignant tumor with a potent capacity to invade locally and cause distant metastasis. Chondrosarcoma shows a predilection for metastasis to the lungs. CCN6 is a cysteine-rich protein that belongs to the CCN (Cyr61, CTGF, and Nov) family of matricellular proteins. However, the effects of CCN6 on human chondrosarcoma cells are largely unknown. In this study, we found that CCN6 increased the migration and the expression of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) in human chondrosarcoma cells. αvβ3 and αvβ5 integrin monoclonal antibody and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MEK) inhibitors (PD98059 and U0126) inhibited the CCN6-induced increase of the migration and ICAM-1 up-regulation of chondrosarcoma cells. CCN6 stimulation increased the phosphorylation of focal adhesion kinase (FAK), MEK, and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK). In addition, activator protein-1 (AP-1) inhibitors suppressed the cell migration and ICAM-1 expression enhanced by CCN6. Moreover, CCN6 increased AP-1 luciferase activity and binding of c-Jun to the AP-1 element on the ICAM-1 promoter. Taken together, our results indicate that CCN6 enhances the migration of chondrosarcoma cells by increasing ICAM-1 expression through the αvβ3 and αvβ5 integrin receptor, FAK, MEK, ERK, c-Jun, and AP-1 signal transduction pathway.     

NEDD9 stabilizes focal adhesions, increases binding to the extra-cellular matrix and differentially effects 2D versus 3D cell migration

The speed of cell migration on 2-dimensional (2D) surfaces is determined by the rate of assembly and disassembly of clustered integrin receptors known as focal adhesions. Different modes of cell migration that have been described in 3D environments are distinguished by their dependence on integrin-mediated interactions with the extra-cellular matrix. In particular, the mesenchymal invasion mode is the most dependent on focal adhesion dynamics. The focal adhesion protein NEDD9 is a key signalling intermediary in mesenchymal cell migration, however whether NEDD9 plays a role in regulating focal adhesion dynamics has not previously been reported. As NEDD9 effects on 2D migration speed appear to depend on the cell type examined, in the present study we have used mouse embryo fibroblasts (MEFs) from mice in which the NEDD9 gene has been depleted (NEDD9 -/- MEFs). This allows comparison with effects of other focal adhesion proteins that have previously been demonstrated using MEFs. We show that focal adhesion disassembly rates are increased in the absence of NEDD9 expression and this is correlated with increased paxillin phosphorylation at focal adhesions. NEDD9-/- MEFs have increased rates of migration on 2D surfaces, but conversely, migration of these cells is significantly reduced in 3D collagen gels. Importantly we show that myosin light chain kinase is activated in 3D in the absence of NEDD9 and is conversely inhibited in 2D cultures. Measurement of adhesion strength reveals that NEDD9-/- MEFs have decreased adhesion to fibronectin, despite upregulated α5β1 fibronectin receptor expression. We find that β1 integrin activation is significantly suppressed in the NEDD9-/-, suggesting that in the absence of NEDD9 there is decreased integrin receptor activation. Collectively our data suggest that NEDD9 may promote 3D cell migration by slowing focal adhesion disassembly, promoting integrin receptor activation and increasing adhesion force to the ECM.     

Single cell tracking assay reveals an opposite effect of selective small non-peptidic α5β1 or αvβ3/β5 integrin antagonists in U87MG glioma cells

BackgroundIntegrins are extracellular matrix receptors involved in several pathologies. Despite homologies between the RGD-binding α5β1 and αvβ3 integrins, selective small antagonists for each heterodimer have been proposed. Herein, we evaluated the effects of such small antagonists in a cellular context, the U87MG cell line, which express both integrins. The aim of the study was to determine if fibronectin-binding integrin antagonists are able to impact on cell adhesion and migration in relationships with their defined affinity and selectivity for α5β1 and αvβ3/β5 purified integrins.MethodsSmall antagonists were either selective for α5β1 integrin, for αvβ3/β5 integrin or non-selective. U87MG cell adhesion was evaluated on fibronectin or vitronectin. Migration assays included wound healing recovery and single cell tracking experiments. U87MG cells stably manipulated for the expression of α5 integrin subunit were used to explore the impact of α5β1 integrin in the biological assays.ResultsU87MG cell adhesion on fibronectin or vitronectin was respectively dependent on α5β1 or αvβ3/β5 integrin. Wound healing migration was dependent on both integrins. However U87MG single cell migration was highly dependent on α5β1 integrin and was inhibited selectively by α5β1 integrin antagonists but increased by αvβ3/β5 integrin antagonists.ConclusionsWe provide a rationale for testing new integrin ligands in a cell-based assay to characterize more directly their potential inhibitory effects on integrin cellular functions.General significanceOur data highlight a single cell tracking assay as a powerful cell-based test which may help to characterize true functional integrin antagonists that block α5β1 integrin-dependent cell migration.     

Vinculin activates inside-out signaling of integrin αIIbβ3 in Chinese hamster ovary cells

Although vinculin is used frequently as a marker for integrin-mediated focal adhesion complexes, how it regulates the activation of integrin is mostly unknown. In this study, we examined whether vinculin would activate integrin in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells expressing human integrin αIIbβ3. Silencing of vinculin by lentiviral transduction with a short hairpin RNA sequence affected the binding of PAC-1 (an antibody recognizing activated human αIIbβ3) to a constitutively active form of αIIbβ3 (α6Bβ3) expressed on CHO cells, while its inhibitory effects were much weaker than those of talin-1. Overexpression of an active form of vinculin without intramolecular interactions, but not the full length one, induced PAC-1 binding to native αIIbβ3 expressed on CHO cells in a manner dependent on talin-1. On the other hand, silencing of talin-1, but not vinculin, failed to induce cell spreading of α6Bβ3-CHO cells on fibrinogen, even in the presence of PT 25-2, a monoclonal antibody that activates αIIbβ3. Thus, an active form of vinculin could induce αIIbβ3 inside-out signaling through the actions of talin-1, while vinculin was dispensable for outside-in signaling.     

Ligand density and integrin repertoire regulate cellular response to LPA

Engagement of integrin receptors by the extracellular matrix (ECM) protein fibronectin (FN) activates intracellular signaling, cytoskeletal reorganization and cellular tension. The soluble factor lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) acts through Rho GTPase and its effector Rho kinase (ROCK) to enhance α5β1 integrin-mediated cell spreading on the Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) cell-binding domain of FN. A second cell-binding site for α4 integrins resides in the CS1 segment of the alternatively spliced V region of FN. We show here that LPA treatment of α4β1-expressing CHOα4 cells on FN induced a significant decrease in spread cell area. LPA also decreased apoptosis induced by serum-deprivation in CHOα4 and human A375 melanoma cells in an α4β1-dependent manner. Improvement in cell viability and changes in cell morphology were dependent on ROCK and on the number of substrate binding sites for α4β1. LPA signaling combined with α4β1-mediated adhesion appears to sustain cell viability in situations where FN matrix is limiting. Such cooperation may impact dynamic cellular events such as wound healing, fibrosis, and metastasis.     

Vesicle-associated membrane protein 2 mediates trafficking of α5β1 integrin to the plasma membrane

Integrins are major receptors for cell adhesion to the extracellular matrix (ECM). As transmembrane proteins, the levels of integrins at the plasma membrane or the cell surface are ultimately determined by the balance between two vesicle trafficking events: endocytosis of integrins at the plasma membrane and exocytosis of the vesicles that transport integrins. Here, we report that vesicle-associated membrane protein 2 (VAMP2), a SNARE protein that mediates vesicle fusion with the plasma membrane, is involved in the trafficking of α5β1 integrin. VAMP2 was present on vesicles containing endocytosed β1 integrin. Small interfering RNA (siRNA) silencing of VAMP2 markedly reduced cell surface α5β1 and inhibited cell adhesion and chemotactic migration to fibronectin, the ECM ligand of α5β1, without altering cell surface expression of α2β1 integrin or α3β1 integrin. By contrast, silencing of VAMP8, another SNARE protein, had no effect on cell surface expression of the integrins or cell adhesion to fibronectin. In addition, VAMP2-mediated trafficking is involved in cell adhesion to collagen but not to laminin. Consistent with disruption of integrin functions in cell proliferation and survival, VAMP2 silencing diminished proliferation and triggered apoptosis. Collectively, these data indicate that VAMP2 mediates the trafficking of α5β1 integrin to the plasma membrane and VAMP2-dependent integrin trafficking is critical in cell adhesion, migration and survival.     

Integrin α7β1 is a redox-regulated target of hydrogen peroxide in vascular smooth muscle cell adhesion

Upon adhesion to laminin-111, aortic smooth muscle cells initially form membrane protrusions with an average diameter of 2.9μm. We identified these protrusions also as subcellular areas of increased redox potential and protein oxidation by detecting cysteine sulfenic acid groups with dimedone. Hence, we termed these areas oxidative hot spots. They are spatially and temporally transient during an early stage of adhesion and depend on the activity of the H(2)O(2)-generating NADPH oxidase 4. Presumably located on cellular protrusions, integrin α7β1 mediates adhesion and migration of vascular smooth muscle cells to laminins of their surrounding basement membrane. Using protein chemistry and mass spectrometry, two specific oxidation sites within the integrin α7 subunit were identified: one located in its genu region and another within its calf 2 domain. Upon H(2)O(2) treatment, two cysteine residues are oxidized thereby unlocking a disulfide bridge. The genu region is a hinge, around which the integrin domains pivot between a bent/inactive and an upright/active conformation. Also, cysteine oxidation within the calf 2 domain permits conformational changes related to integrin activation. H(2)O(2) treatment of α7β1 integrin in concentrations of up to 100μM increases integrin binding activity to laminin-111, suggesting a physiological redox regulation of α7β1 integrin.     

Cross-talk between integrins alpha1beta1 and alpha2beta1 in renal epithelial cells

The collagen-binding integrins α1β1 and α2β1 have profoundly different functions, yet they are often co-expressed in epithelial cells. When both integrins are expressed in the same cell, it has been suggested that α1β1 negatively regulates integrin α2β1-dependent functions. In this study we utilized murine ureteric bud (UB) epithelial cells, which express no functionally detectable levels of endogenous integrins α1β1 and α2β1, to determine the mechanism whereby this regulation occurs. We demonstrate that UB cells expressing integrin α2β1, but not α1β1 adhere, migrate and proliferate on collagen I as well as form cellular cords in 3D collagen I gels. Substitution of the transmembrane domain of the integrin α2 subunit with that of α1 results in decreased cell adhesion, migration and cord formation. In contrast, substitution of the integrin α2 cytoplasmic tail with that of α1, decreases cell migration and cord formation, but increases proliferation. When integrin α1 and α2 subunits are co-expressed in UB cells, the α1 subunit negatively regulates integrin α2β1-dependent cord formation, adhesion and migration and this inhibition requires expression of both α1 and α2 tails. Thus, we provide evidence that the transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains of the α2 integrin subunit, as well as the α1 integrin subunit, regulate integrin α2β1 cell function.     

Selective binding and lateral clustering of α5β1 and αvβ3 integrins: Unraveling the spatial requirements for cell spreading and focal adhesion assembly

ABSTRACT

Coordination of the specific functions of α5β1 and αvβ3 integrins is crucial for the precise regulation of cell adhesion, spreading and migration, yet the contribution of differential integrin-specific crosstalk to these processes remains unclear. To determine the specific functions of αvβ3 and α5β1 integrins, we used nanoarrays of gold particles presenting immobilized, integrin-selective peptidomimetic ligands. Integrin binding to the peptidomimetics is highly selective, and cells can spread on both ligands. However, spreading is faster and the projected cell area is greater on α5β1 ligand; both depend on ligand spacing. Quantitative analysis of adhesion plaques shows that focal adhesion size is increased in cells adhering to αvβ3 ligand at 30 and 60 nm spacings. Analysis of αvβ3 and α5β1 integrin clusters indicates that fibrillar adhesions are more prominent in cells adhering to α5β1 ligand, while clusters are mostly localized at the cell margins in cells adhering to αvβ3 ligand. αvβ3 integrin clusters are more pronounced on αvβ3 ligand, though they can also be detected in cells adhering to α5β1 ligand. Furthermore, α5β1 integrin clusters are present in cells adhering to α5β1 ligand, and often colocalize with αvβ3 clusters. Taken together, these findings indicate that the activation of αvβ3 integrin by ligand binding is dispensable for initial adhesion and spreading, but essential to formation of stable focal adhesions.     

N-cadherin cell-cell adhesion complexes are regulated by fibronectin matrix assembly

Fibronectin is a principal component of the extracellular matrix. Soluble fibronectin molecules are assembled into the extracellular matrix as insoluble, fibrillar strands via a cell-dependent process. In turn, the interaction of cells with the extracellular matrix form of fibronectin stimulates cell functions critical for tissue repair. Cross-talk between cell-cell and cell-extracellular matrix adhesion complexes is essential for the organization of cells into complex, functional tissue during embryonic development and tissue remodeling. Here, we demonstrate that fibronectin matrix assembly affects the organization, composition, and function of N-cadherin-based adherens junctions. Using fibronectin-null mouse embryonic myofibroblasts, we identified a novel quaternary complex composed of N-cadherin, β-catenin, tensin, and actin that exists in the absence of a fibronectin matrix. In the absence of fibronectin, homophilic N-cadherin ligation recruited both tensin and α5β1 integrins into nascent cell-cell adhesions. Initiation of fibronectin matrix assembly disrupted the association of tensin and actin with N-cadherin, released α5β1 integrins and tensin from cell-cell contacts, stimulated N-cadherin reorganization into thin cellular protrusions, and decreased N-cadherin adhesion. Fibronectin matrix assembly has been shown to recruit α5β1 integrins and tensin into fibrillar adhesions. Taken together, these studies suggest that tensin serves as a common cytoskeletal link for integrin- and cadherin-based adhesions and that the translocation of α5β1 integrins from cell-cell contacts into fibrillar adhesions during fibronectin matrix assembly is a novel mechanism by which cell-cell and cell-matrix adhesions are coordinated.     

The α4β1 Fibronectin Ligands CS-19 HEP II,and RGD Induce Different Intracellular Events in B Lymphoid Cells. Comparison with the Effects of the Endothelial Ligand V CAM-1

The lymphocyte integrin α4β1 is the receptor for the Hep II domain and CS-1 site in fibronectin (Fn) as well as for VCAM-1. We recently showed that upon activation with anti-β1 mAb TS2/16, α4β1 also recognizes the RGD Fn sequence. To determine the physiological role of these multiple interactions, we have now studied some intracellular events induced by “resting” and activated α4β1 binding to its different ligands. Analyses of actin and tubulin reorganization upon adhesion of B lymphoid cells to Fn fragments or VCAM-1 showed that VCAM-1, a 38 kDa fragment (Hep II+CS-1), and the CS-1 synthetic peptide induced formation of transient cytoplasmic projections; however, cells attached to a 58 kDa (Hep II) or 80 kDa (RGD) fragments remained rounded. Using transfilter assays, we showed that VCAM-1, 38 kDa and CS-1 also induced dose-dependent B cell migration mediated by α4β1. Furthermore, these three ligands, but not the 80 kDa fragment or a synthetic peptide (H1) containing a sequence from Hep II shown to bind α4β1, induced tyrosine phosphorylation of a 110 kDa protein. Activation of α4β1 with TS2/16 inhibited the cytoplasmic protrusions and cell migration but did not affect the pattern of phosphorylation. Our results indicate that the various α4β1 ligands induce different cellular responses. Most importantly they show that α4β1 interaction with CS-1 is sufficient to trigger intracellular events in B cells. Furthermore, they suggest a regulation by the activation form of the receptor as well as by the ligand in events involving lymphocyte adhesion and migration.     

Signal-dependent slow leukocyte rolling does not require cytoskeletal anchorage of P-selectin glycoprotein ligand-1 (PSGL-1) or integrin αLβ2

In inflamed venules, neutrophils roll on P- or E-selectin, engage P-selectin glycoprotein ligand-1 (PSGL-1), and signal extension of integrin α(L)β(2) in a low affinity state to slow rolling on intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1). Cytoskeleton-dependent receptor clustering often triggers signaling, and it has been hypothesized that the cytoplasmic domain links PSGL-1 to the cytoskeleton. Chemokines cause rolling neutrophils to fully activate α(L)β(2), leading to arrest on ICAM-1. Cytoskeletal anchorage of α(L)β(2) has been linked to chemokine-triggered extension and force-regulated conversion to the high affinity state. We asked whether PSGL-1 must interact with the cytoskeleton to initiate signaling and whether α(L)β(2) must interact with the cytoskeleton to extend. Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching of transfected cells documented cytoskeletal restraint of PSGL-1. The lateral mobility of PSGL-1 similarly increased by depolymerizing actin filaments with latrunculin B or by mutating the cytoplasmic tail to impair binding to the cytoskeleton. Converting dimeric PSGL-1 to a monomer by replacing its transmembrane domain did not alter its mobility. By transducing retroviruses expressing WT or mutant PSGL-1 into bone marrow-derived macrophages from PSGL-1-deficient mice, we show that PSGL-1 required neither dimerization nor cytoskeletal anchorage to signal β(2) integrin-dependent slow rolling on P-selectin and ICAM-1. Depolymerizing actin filaments or decreasing actomyosin tension in neutrophils did not impair PSGL-1- or chemokine-mediated integrin extension. Unlike chemokines, PSGL-1 did not signal cytoskeleton-dependent swing out of the β(2)-hybrid domain associated with the high affinity state. The cytoskeletal independence of PSGL-1-initiated, α(L)β(2)-mediated slow rolling differs markedly from the cytoskeletal dependence of chemokine-initiated, α(L)β(2)-mediated arrest.     

Negative Cooperativity between α3β1and α2β1Integrins in Human Mammary Carcinoma MDA MB 231 Cells

The α₃β₁integrin has been implicated as a receptor for several matrix components, including collagen, fibronectin, and laminins. The function of α₃β₁seems to be very versatile involving cell adhesion to or migration on ECM, establishment of cell–cell contacts in aggregates, as well as linkage to intracellular tyrosine phosphorylation cascades. Here we report a strong induction of attachment of α₃β₁integrin expressing human breast carcinoma cell line MDA MB 231 to matrix proteins by two α₃integrin subunit function-blocking monoclonal antibodies (P1B5 and ASC-1). In contrast, stimulation of adhesion to ECM by inhibitory α₃integrin-specific antibodies was not observed in the α₃β₁integrin-expressing nonmalignant human mammary epithelial cell line MCF-10A or the human breast carcinoma cell line MDA MB 468 that expressed relatively low amounts of α₃β₁integrin at the cell surface. This increase was specific for collagens and not observed on fibronectin or laminin. Physiological concentrations of bivalent cations were not required. MAb P1B5 did not induce homotypic aggregation of MDA MB 231 cells. The P1B5-induced increase in cell attachment to collagens could be prevented but not reduced below control levels by blocking mAb to the α₂integrin subunit. Function blocking anti-α₅integrin subunit mAb was without effect while anti-β₁-mAb completely abolished adhesion. Our data indicate that negative cooperativity between integrins results in transdominant inhibition of α₂β₁function by α₃β₁in human MDA MB 231 but not MDA MB 468 tumor cells or nonmalignant MCF-10A cells.     

Localization of urokinase type plasminogen activator to focal adhesions requires ligation of vitronectin integrin receptors

Previous studies have shown that the adhesion protein, vitronectin, directs the localization of urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) to areas of cell-substrate adhesion, where uPA is thought to regulate cell migration as well as pericellular proteolysis. In the present study, HT-1080 cell lines expressing either wild-type vitronectin or vitronectin containing a single amino-acid substitution in the integrin binding domain were used to assess whether ligation of the alphavbeta5 integrin was required for uPA localization to focal adhesions. The synthesis of wild-type vitronectin by HT-1080 cells adherent to either collagen or fibronectin resulted in the redistribution of both the alphavbeta5 integrin as well as uPA to focal adhesion structures. In contrast, cells synthesizing mutant vitronectin, containing the amino-acid substitution in the integrin binding domain, were unable to direct the redistribution of either alphavbeta5 or uPA to focal adhesions. Recombinant forms of wild-type and mutant vitronectin were prepared in a baculovirus system and compared for their ability to direct the redistribution of vitronectin integrin receptors as well as uPA on human skin fibroblasts. In the absence of vitronectin, fibroblast cells adherent to fibronectin assemble focal adhesions which contain the beta1 integrin but do not contain uPA. Addition of recombinant wild-type, but not mutant, vitronectin to fibroblasts adherent to fibronectin resulted in the redistribution of alphavbeta3, alphavbeta5, and uPA into focal adhesions. However, when cells were plated directly onto antibodies directed against either the alphavbeta3 or alphavbeta5 integrins, uPA was not localized on the cell surface. These data indicate that ligation of vitronectin integrin receptors is necessary but not sufficient for the localization of uPA to areas of cell matrix adhesion, and suggest that vitronectin may promote cell migration by recruiting vitronectin integrin receptors and components of the plasminogen activator system to areas of cell matrix contact.     

Distinct Structural Requirements for Interaction of the Integrins α5β1, αvβ5, and αvβ6 with the Central Cell Binding Domain in Fibronectin

At least 10 different members of the integrin family have been reported to bind to fibronectin, and eight of these interact with the arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGD) site in the tenth type III repeat. However, studies utilizing recombinant fibronectin fragments have shown that for three of these, α5β1, αIIbβ3, and αvβ3, the structural requirements for binding to fibronectin differ. In the present study. we report that two additional integrins, αvβ6. and αvβ5 also demonstrate unique requirements for interaction with recombinant fibronectin fragments. αvβ5, like αvβ3, can support cell adhesion to the RGD-containing tenth repeat alone, and does not require the presence of a synergy site in the adjacent ninth repeat. In the cells used in this study. αvβ5 only minimally supported adhesion to intact fibronectin. but did support adhesion to fragments composed of the eighth, ninth and tenth repeats or the tenth repeat. alone. Mutant fragments in which the eighth and tenth repeats were adjacent to one another enhanced adhesion mediated by αvβ5, as well as adhesion mediated by αvβ6. αvβ5 and αvβ6-mediated adhesion to all fibronectin fragments required interaction with the RGD site, as inferred by inhibition of adhesion with an RGD-containing peptide. These data suggest that each integrin that interacts with the RGD site in fibronectin has unique structural requirements for this interaction.